|
Check out Fintan Dunne's interview with John
Kaminski at Break
for News: Fri 10 June 56k
DSL
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Moonrise
Copyright 2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
Building on simulations of traditional precepts of
liberal democracy, neoliberalism has forged a new
synthesis or hybrid that effectively rationalizes,
celebrates, and promotes the globalization process
and the increasing globality of industrial production,
commercial trade, financial integration, and information
flow. It has brought to the fore a new global class
of economic and political entrepreneurs who operate
not only transnationally but also at the national,
regional, metropolitan, and local scales to foster
those conditions that facilitate the freedoms of global
capitalism: increasing privatization
of the public sphere, deregulation in every economic
sector, the breakdown of all barriers to trade and
the free flow of capital, attacks on the welfare state
and labor unions, and other … And it
is carried forward in a series of familiar spin-doctoring
slogans having to do with the magic of the market,
the ineffectiveness of Big Government, the triumph
of capitalism, the emergence of a borderless world,
and a whole slew of "end-ofs" - of history
and geography, of socialism and the welfare state,
of ideology itself. (from Edward W. Soja, Postmetropolis:
Critical Studies of Cities and Regions, Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publising, 2000, p. 216)
Ordinary working Bolivians are fighting to get rid
of the stranglehold that transnational corporations
have on Bolivia's economy. They are also fighting
to strip power away from a political elite who they
view as in bed with the transnationals--as vendepatrias
(corrupt officials willing to sell off Bolivia's patrimony
on the cheap).
Ever since the popular victory achieved during Cochabamba's
Water War in April 2000--when mass struggle defeated
a plan to privatize the city's water system--the struggle
of the Bolivian people has focused mainly on reclaiming
workers' and citizens' control of Bolivia's natural
resources. The experience of throwing U.S.-based Bechtel
out of Cochabamba--and of then turning the city's
water service over to the elected representatives
of a citizens' and workers' self-management team--inspired
the confidence and determination of Bolivia's disenfranchised
majority.
There is hardly any need for an outside spark to
ignite the social powder keg existing in Bolivia,
South America's most impoverished country. According
to Bolivia's National Institute of Statistics, 64
percent of the urban population lives in poverty,
while in the countryside conditions are even worse,
with 80 percent in poverty. More than one-third of
the country lives on less than two dollars a day,
while the infant mortality rate - 95 for every 1,000
births - is worse than much of Africa.
The conception that the country's wealth should be
utilized to benefit its people rather than fatten
the profits of foreign oil conglomerates has gripped
the masses. This is not - to use the words of George
W. Bush at his speech at the OAS this week - the product
of a "false ideology," but rather a conclusion
drawn from intensely bitter experience with free-market
policies and wholesale privatization.
The conception that the struggles that have shaken
Bolivia in recent weeks are the product of "outside
agitation" by Chávez is an echo of the
longstanding US view that every movement against social
oppression and every challenge to the interests of
US-based multinationals represents a "communist
conspiracy." This police-state ideology guided
a US policy of support for military dictatorships
and savage repression in Latin America for over 50
years. Noriega's comment is a warning that the Bush
administration is prepared to resort to these methods
once again.
Jean Luc Dehaene, a former Belgian PM, exhibited
comparable contempt for popular opinion: In a BBC
interview last Monday, Mr Dehaene made the extraordinary
remark that the results in France were meaningless
because the electorate was not voting against the
constitution, but against the French government. Common
sense suggests that on the contrary, they were voting
precisely against the constitution, a project of politicians
such as Dehaene who are determined to pursue an unpopular
agenda with or without popular consent. This notion
also appears to be confirmed by the British newsmagazine,
The Economist, which noted that five of the top 10
best-selling non-fiction books in France were about
the Constitution. Millions of people watched television
shows discussing it. A huge percentage of respondents
in public opinion polls were familiar with its content.
There was huge voter turnout (70 per cent) and people
had a very good idea of what the issues were.
This obliviousness to public opinion has been the
flaw at the heart of the whole "European Project"
right from the start. It is scarcely remembered now
that France only barely ratified the introduction
of the euro in a vote so tight that its adoption by
a few tenths of a percentage point gives lie to the
word, "democracy" that lifts so carelessly
off the lips of the most undemocratic of politicians.
The dirty little secret of European Monetary Union
is that there has never been a proper debate on the
pros and cons of the single currency union within
the member states. Like so much else in regard to
the EU, it was imposed from above. Yet this is a debate
that must occur because the European Monetary Union
and its attendant institutions, such as the European
Central Bank, ultimately cannot succeed in the absence
of open, public discussion and acceptance, in lieu
of bureaucratic imposition.
It is said that politicians in particular and the
democratic process in general cannot be trusted with
economic policy formulation because they lead to decisions
that have stimulating short-term effects (for example,
reducing unemployment via higher government spending)
but are detrimental in the longer term (a notable
example is a rise in inflation). But comprehensive
rejection of the constitution has proved to be an
outlet for discontent extending well beyond this particular
issue; French and Dutch voters have now shown us the
limits of pure technocratic economic management in
an environment divorced from political reality.
On the other hand, to debate the appropriateness
of a single currency union at this juncture may engender
unintended results. It is extraordinary to consider,
for example, that the German people never had the
opportunity to express their views in a referendum
as to whether they ought to abandon one of the most
successful post-war monetary regimes in favour of
an untried and untested currency. Even if one makes
allowances for Germany's traditional post-war phobia
of being perceived as "bad Europeans", it
is almost certain that most would have voted to retain
the D-mark, had they been given the opportunity to
express themselves in a proper democratic forum.
Already, there are stirrings of euro discontent emerging
at the margins in Germany as well as Italy. The referendum
results in France and the Netherlands appear to have
lit a match on a tinder box of huge continent-wide
disenchantment. Consider what is happening to the
now discredited EU constitution in the wake of the
French and Dutch referendum results: Four separate
polls in Denmark and a survey in the Czech Republic
indicated the two countries could both vote No in
referendums on the constitution. Bild, a leading German
tabloid, showed overwhelming hostility in Germany
to the constitution. Of the 390,694 readers who responded,
96.9% said they would vote no if a referendum were
held there.
The interest rate conundrum is challenging enough.
But now the dollar is springing back to life in the
face of America's record current account deficit.
In my view, this defies both the history and the analytics
of the classic current account adjustment. Is this
just another example of a world turned inside out,
or is it a head-fake likely to be reversed?
Despite rebounding nearly
3% from its low this January, the broad dollar index
is still down about 13% from peak levels hit in early
2002. The dollar's descent is a logical outgrowth
of America's massive current account deficit. The
only problem is that it hasn't fallen nearly enough
to make a dent in the US external imbalance.
A comparison with trends in the late 1980s underscores
this conclusion: During that earlier period, America's
current account deficit peaked out at 3.4% of GDP
and the broad dollar index fell nearly 30% over the
three-year period, 1985-88. With our estimates placing
the US current account deficit at about 6.5% in 1Q05,
it is hardly a stretch of the imagination to see the
external shortfall rise into the 7-7.5% range over
the next year. In other words,
today's current account problem is easily twice as
bad as it was back in the 1980s but the US currency
has fallen by less than half as much as it did back
then. On that simple basis, alone, the dollar
has plenty more to go on the downside.
I have long maintained that
the dollar can't do the job alone in correcting America's
current account imbalance. Two reasons come to mind
-- the first being that the impact of currency fluctuations
on real trade flows and inflation seems to have diminished
over the past decade. Trends over the past
three years underscore this observation: The US trade
deficit has continued to widen fully three years into
what had been a 15% dollar depreciation, whereas inflation
has remained generally subdued over this same period.
By this time in the dollar's downtrend of the late
1980s, both trade and inflationary impacts were evident.
I suspect that the diminished impact of currency swings
in the current climate stems importantly from the
increasingly powerful forces of globalization, as
low-cost offshore price setters (i.e., China) constrain
domestic pricing leverage -- even in the face of currency
swings and concomitant fluctuations in import prices.
That suggests, of course, the impacts of currency
fluctuations could show up more in corporate profit
margins than in generalized inflation.
But the second and far more
important reason that the dollar can't solve America's
trade and current account problem is that it doesn't
get directly at the most critical ingredient of the
imbalance -- excess imports, which are, in turn, an
outgrowth of excess US domestic demand. One
number says it all:
In March 2005, US imports were fully 54% larger than
exports. In my view, there is no conceivable dollar
adjustment -- or should I say no politically acceptable
dollar adjustment -- that would eliminate America's
excess import problem. The
only effective way to temper an import overhang of
this magnitude lies in a real interest rate adjustment
that would squeeze excess consumption -- and its import
content -- out of the system. At a minimum, this would
entail a normalization of real US interest rates --
both short and long. Specifically, I believe that
would require the term structure of real rates to
move upward by about two percentage points from present
rock-bottom levels. Not only would that hit
the interest-sensitive components of domestic demand
-- consumer durables, capital spending, and residential
construction -- but it would also cool off frothy
asset markets and the wealth-dependent consumption
(and imports) such market excesses are fostering.
In this context, America's current account adjust
requires a combination of currency and real interest
rate adjustments -- both a weaker dollar and a normalization
of real interest rates. This underscores an important
tradeoff: To the extent that
one of the ingredients in this external adjustment
equation doesn't deliver its fair share, the burden
of rebalancing should then be transferred to the other
part of the equation. Therein lies the case for a
significant further weakening in the US dollar.
In my recently revised view of US interest rate prospects,
America's long overdue normalization of real rates
is likely to be aborted (see my 30 May dispatch, "Rethinking
Bonds"). In the face of the coming China-led
slowdown in global growth and its collateral impacts
on reduced inflationary expectations, a decidedly
pro-growth and market-friendly Fed is unlikely to
have much of an appetite for additional monetary tightening.
Moreover, the combined impacts of a global growth
shortfall and further declines in commodity prices
point to a likely compression in the inflationary
premium embedded at the long end of the yield curve.
As I now see it, given the urgency of a US current
account adjustment, further dollar depreciation is
a logical outgrowth of such a benign climate in the
bond market.
Of course, precisely the opposite
is now happening. After an orderly three-year descent
of about 5% per year, the broad dollar index has been
edging higher over the past four months. This
momentum has accelerated in the days immediately after
the French and Dutch rejection of the EU constitution.
Market participants have taken this political verdict
as negative feedback on the future of European integration
and the reforms and efficiency enhancement such convergence
was long thought to deliver… However, given
my concerns over the US current account deficit and
my reassessment of the US interest rate prognosis,
I do not agree with Stephen that the dollar's structural
decline is over. By my count, this is the fourth trading
rally in the dollar's recent 39-month downtrend. Like
the first three, I believe this one will also fade
as the power of the US current account adjustment
regains its prominence as the dominant macro theme
shaping foreign exchange markets. In the absence of
an upward adjustment to US real interest rates, I
believe this possibility is even more compelling than
might have otherwise been the case.
The next downleg of the dollar
should be very different from the first one. The euro
has borne the brunt of the dollar's decline over the
three years ending January 2005. Most Asian currencies
-- especially the yen and renminbi -- were completely
unscathed. If the dollar resumes its downward descent,
as I suspect, that will have to change. Not only do
I look for a politically driven change in Chinese
currency policy that would allow for an RMB revaluation,
but I also suspect that the yen-dollar cross-rate
could move into the mid-90s. The Japanese currency
has been virtually unchanged on a broad trade-weighted
basis over the entire span of the dollar's adjustment.
If the Japanese recovery is finally for real, as official
Japan seems to be signaling, then yen appreciation
should be a natural outgrowth of that healing. If
the Chinese and Japanese currencies strengthen, most
other Asian currencies should follow suit -- with
the possible exception of the Korean won, which has
already moved a lot. I've said it from the start:
Global rebalancing is a shared responsibility. It
is high time that Asia participate in the adjustment
process.
…Of course, currency markets are also highly
sensitive to swings in investor sentiment. And with
the benefit of hindsight, we should have known that
the dollar was about to surprise on the upside. …Nevertheless,
I think this counter-trend rally will be short-lived.
The imperatives of global rebalancing -- underscored
by America's massive current account deficit in conjunction
with an aborted adjustment in US real interest rates
-- points to nothing less. If I'm wrong and the dollar
continues to defy gravity in a low interest rate climate,
you can forget about global rebalancing. In that case,
global imbalances will continue to mount and asset
markets could become all the frothier. Sadly, the
endgame would then be ever more treacherous.
In the past we have described the problems of the
US economy ad nauseum. We have also highlighted the
problems of the yen and the structural problems inherent
in the existing European Monetary Union. Although
the euro zone as a whole suffers less from the debt
disease prevalent in both the US and Japan, it has
largely "earned" its spurs on the foreign
exchange markets as a consequence of being the least
bad major paper currency alternative. Its acceptance
has, until recently, continued unabated, largely by
virtue of not being the dollar, as opposed to any
intrinsic merits.
Generally speaking, most currency choices faced by
market practitioners today are comparable to Keynes's
notion of market speculation: to paraphrase Keynes,
one is not seeking to adjudge the most beautiful currency
in absolute terms, but merely seeking to guess what
the market's will judge to have the best relative
merits . In other words, paper currencies are only
"relatively" attractive vis a vis each other
and not genuinely attractive as ultimate stores of
value. The current problems of the euro (as well as
the longstanding problems of the dollar) illustrate
that phenomenon.
This points the way toward a potential major paradigm
shift in relation to gold, long viewed simply as another
variant of the "anti-dollar" theme. Symptomatic
of this shift in thinking is the Financial Times,
a publication which has usually been viscerally hostile
to gold as a legitimate reserve currency asset. In
an editorial last April, however, the FT came to a
fairly stunning conclusion:
"In truth, there are good
reasons for selling all three of the world's main
currencies. But could they all fall? Yes, against
either gold or the Chinese renminbi. In recent years,
gold has been a useful hedge against the dollar, but
not against the euro or yen. Meanwhile, the
U.S., Japan, and the EU would all like to see the
renminbi revalue, but so far, the Chinese are not
playing."
The current travails of the euro
may change the perception of gold as a barbarous relic
from a bygone era For the FT, which has been known
as a very anti-gold publication, to come to this conclusion
means that many people who have long viewed bullion
as economically irrelevant are likely reassessing
their viewpoint. This could well point the way forward
for gold, notwithstanding the many travails its holders
have experienced over the past two decades. Often,
seismic shifts in thinking unfold in slow-motion,
and are often masked by other "noisier"
events, such as the French and Dutch referendums.
The "noisier events", however, could well
be catalysing a far more profound change in financial
thinking. The rejection of the EU's constitution in
France and the Netherlands, therefore, may well have
initiated something well beyond the control of today's
paper currency custodians, much to their ultimate
horror no doubt.
Buying
into 'virtual realty'
Investors go online to buy into hot housing markets
By Scott Cohn
Correspondent
CNBC June 9, 2005
Location is the most important thing in real estate,
they say, but if you're looking to invest in real
estate, but don't want to travel to any of the hot
markets, the Internet has created a "virtual
realty" just in time for the housing boom.
Take Mike Bozzo, for example. He owns a successful
welding business in Dayton, Ohio. But every day, when
he gets to his office, the first place he goes to
is Florida.
"I like to spend about an hour looking at different
properties," Bozzo says, adding that he visits
a number of different real estate sites every day.
"This is something I'm looking to do for the
future of my family."
Bozzo says his Florida Web surfing is pay off. Over
the last four years, he has made well into six figures
by buying and selling Florida real estate online,
and almost all of it has been sight unseen.
Indeed, a condominium Bozzo bought four years ago
for about $220,000 is now selling for two and a half
time that amount. One he bought earlier this year
for $279,000 is on the market today for $379,000.
Mike Bozzo isn't alone. With the housing market booming,
22 million people are visiting real estate Web sites
every month. But before you jump on the Internet and
start buying, beware - this is still a risky business,
and it's made even riskier by doing it on the Internet.
Bozzo confines his surfing to Naples, Fla. Not just
because housing has appreciated 93 percent there in
the last five years, but also because he's been going
there since he was a teenager and he knows the area.
"I'm a very detail-oriented person, and that's
the way I approach it," said Bozzo. "I think
that's important - that you understand the area that
you're getting involved with."
And Bozzo doesn't only use the Internet to find properties
through the Web sites of several local realtors. He
also uses it to research tax assessments and recent
sales - information that's readily available online.
And he always gets a properties inspected, and has
a realtor he trusts in Naples who'll check out the
property in person if necessary.
Real estate expert John Reed says that's important.
"The due diligence still has to be done,"
said Reed of Real Estate Investor's Monthly. "And
if you're going to trust somebody else to do it, you
better know that person really, really well."
Bozzo hopes to retire on his
real estate profits, which may be another benefit
to investing this way…
|
In 1876, William Kingdon
Clifford wrote two essays entitled "Ethics of Belief"
and "Ethics of Religion", both of which were
fiercely critical of religious thought and practice.
The first of these two essays caused repercussions because
it contained Clifford's famous conclusion:
"It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone,
to believe anything on insufficient evidence."
Clifford placed, without compromise, the responsibility
for what we believe on each and every one of us. In
his essay, Clifford introduces the topic of "The
Duty of Inquiry" with a parable:
A shipowner was about to send to sea an emigrant-ship.
He knew that she was old, and not over-well built
at first; and that she had seem many seas and climes,
and often needed repairs. Doubts had been suggested
to him that possibly she was not seaworthy. These
doubts preyed upon his mind, and made him unhappy;
he thought that perhaps he ought to have her thoroughly
overhauled and refitted, even though this would put
him to great expense. Before the ship sailed, however,
he succeeded in overcoming these melancholy reflections.
He said to himself that she had gone safely through
so many voyages and had weathered so many storms that
it was idle to suppose that she would not come home
safely from this trip also. He would put his trust
in Providence, which could hardly fail to protect
all these unhappy families that were leaving their
fatherland to seek for better times elsewhere. He
would dismiss from his mind all ungenerous suspicions
about the honesty of builders and contractors. In
such ways he acquired a sincere and comfortable conviction
that his vessel was thoroughly safe and seaworthy;
he watched her departure with a light heart, and benevolent
wished for the success of the exiles in their strange
new home that was to be; and he got his insurance
money when she went down in mid-ocean and told no
tales. What shall we say of him? Surely this, that
he was verily guilty of the death of those men. It
is admitted that he did sincerely believe in the soundness
of his ship; but the sincerity of his conviction can
in no way help him, because ha had no right to believe
on such evidence that was before him.
Clifford goes on to state that we do wrong to ourselves
and to Man by allowing ourselves to be credulous when
there is the possibility for us to question further
and seek truth.
Bertrand Russell read Clifford's published papers:
Common Sense of the Exact Sciences when he
was just fifteen. He later wrote that:
Clifford was much more than a mathematician: he was
a philosopher of considerable merit in what concerned
the foundations of mathematical knowledge ... he saw
all knowledge, even the most abstract, as part of
the general life of mankind, and as concerned in the
endeavour to make human existence less petty, less
superstitious, and less miserable.
|
"See in my line of work you got to keep repeating
things over and over and over again for the truth to sink
in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."
George W. Bush
In this essay, we'll explore how the embodiment of the
Perennial Tradition 1 called philosophy overcomes indoctrination,
brainwashing, and conditioning. Every advanced teacher
within the Perennial Tradition has provided insight into
how false communication--propaganda, lies, deception,
and mind-control-- can be defeated.
Of all the varied embodiments of the Perennial Tradition--the
Hermetic Writings, Hinduism, Buddhism, the Jewish Wisdom
Tradition, the Pythagorean System, Esoteric Christianity,
Neo-Platonism, Sufism, European Gothic Cathedrals, the
Cambridge Platonists, the 18th Century Enlightenment--
Plato's writings constitute the most potent, comprehensive,
and detailed exposition of the Perennial Tradition still
extant. It is through study of Plato's works that we will
explore the domain of communication. [...]
Plato's writings help us to understand that the chasm
between us and arcane reality is not entirely bridgeable
by ordinary sensation. Naive realism assumes that we see,
hear, feel, touch, or taste this reality and thereby know
its true and complete essence. This view fails to take
into cognizance the many "filters" between us
and the enigmatic reality.
Part of what each of Plato's dialogues reveals is how
widespread ignorance of reality actually is, how extensive
and common the delusion is that we understand reality
because we sense something we call "the external
world" and act on it in ways which seem to prove
our complete grasp of its essence. We fail to recognize
the myriad distorting elements between us and reality,
assuming that our naive grasp of the external world brings
complete comprehension.
Plato's dialogues only make sense to persons who have
committed themselves to the search for wisdom (philosophy),
because they've recognized that there are vast continents
of ignorance within their psyche which they need to illuminate.
Only if they have an intense desire to understand the
veiled aspects of reality will Plato's philosophy have
any appeal for them. [...]
"This morning my good friend and confidant . . .
alerted me to your document on Plato's philosophical struggle
against tyranny. Like everyone else I am suffering from
the insanity of the present system and the way you presented
the theme of the struggle for truth helps me better understand
the overall situation and my little place in the food
chain."
"Thank you for your excellent article----it now
explains the reason why Plato's Republic is quiety being
pulled from library shelves. God forbid, we the masses,
should be taught virture and goodness. That is not in
keeping with the takeover of our Republic and the moral
decay which is happening, every day, from this evil cabal,
in the form of 'entertainment.'" [...]
At a time when millions of Americans fail to see the
evil of the criminal cabal and its Bush II puppet junta,
rediscovery of the insights of the Platonic philosophy--enabling
us to overcome propaganda and brainwashing--is of crucial
importance: our personal and social lives depend on it.
In an era of mass propaganda, deception, and murder--of
American soldiers and Afghans and Iraqis--what might appear
mere "philosophical" issues, such as truth and
dialectic, can now be seen to be critical powers of discernment
we must develop if we're to survive. [...]
We begin the dialectical process by relating these issues
to present difficulties. We can legitimately call George
W. Bush's statement in his State of the Union speech a
LIE when he said: "There are weapons of mass destru
ction in Iraq." There were no weapons of mass destruction--as
determined by American weapons inspectors themselves.
So Bush lied.
The issues can become clouded only if we allow the Bush
junta propagandists to operate without challenge. We must
set the terms of discourse, not allowing the Bush indoctrinators
to define the issues or the concepts. The terms we're
investigating possess commonly acknowledged meanings:
1. To lie: 5
* to express an innacurate or false statement
* to convey an untruth
* to make an untrue statement which may or may not
be believed by the speaker
2. A lie:
* an untrue or innacurate statment that may or may
not be believed true by the speaker
* something that misleads or deceives
* something intended or serving to convey a falsehood
3. Truth: 6
* conformity to fact or actuality
* reality, actuality
* that which is considered to be the supreme reality
and to have the ultimate meaning and value of existence
Karl Rove and his legion of falsifiers and deceivers
(throughout the mainstream media outlets, all owned by
right-wing extremists) make such statements as these:
* "A statement is not a lie if it was caused
by incomplete or false
information.
* "I don't believe Bush lied."
* "Bush mispoke--but he didn't lie."
* "Bush didn't intend to deceive, so what he
said wasn't a lie."
The purpose of all these Bush junta obfuscations is
to redefine a lie as the truth. The statement Bush II
made in his State of the Union address was untrue: there
were no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). Bush lied.
It doesn't matter if there were--or weren't--innacurate
or false intelligence reports about the WMDs; Bush's statement
was still a lie.
It is of no significance what Bill O'Reilly and Sean
Hannity feel about whether or not Bush lied; their feelings
don't change the fact that Bush lied. Lying doesn't necessarily
involved the intent to deceive; if a statement served
to convey a falsehood it is a lie. We can't know what
Dubya's intentions were, since those are subjective (and
he doesn't have the moral fibre to admit them), but from
his track record the most compelling hypothesis would
be that he knew he was lying and intended to deceive the
American people into an unnecessary, murderous war.
Any person interested in being honest has the responsibility
of determining if what he says is true. If you don't know
whether something is true or false, then you indicate
that you don't know and make it clear that you're merely
putting forward a likely hypothesis (as in the paragraph
above). That is not what Dubya did. He deliberately and
expressly made a statement which was false. [...]
In the twenty-first century, we must make certain to
set the field of inquiry and controvert the criminal
cabal's deliberate prevarications and dissimulations:
* Bush is a great leader
* Bush started the Iraq war to bring democracy to
the Iraqi people
* Americans must sacrifice their freedom for security
* The criminal cabal had no complicity in 9/11
* Spending over $1 trillion on the Iraq war is good
for America
* Social Security is in genuine difficulty and Bush
has only good intentions in trying to solve the problems
* Bush did not lie about weapons of mass destruction
The present enemies of truth and justice believe they
can call a lie a truth; an aggressive, senseless, unnecessary
war a struggle against terrorism; an illiterate moron
a great leader; and the destruction of America through
fascism, deficit spending and militarism, sound policies.
They believe they can call anything whatever they want
to and the American people will accept it. [...]
When trying to dialogue with persons in the present era,
we must limit our efforts to persons committed to honesty
and truth, asking the same question Socrates did in the
Cratylus:
"Is there anything which you call speaking the
truth and speaking falsehood--is there true speech and
false speech?"
Dialogue is only possible with those persons who genuinely
believe there is objective Truth--beyond personal belief,
feeling, or desire. [...]
At present, it would be impossible to dialogue with Bush
junta members or any of their fellow-travelers (media
propagandists and brain-dead, reactionary citizens), since
they simply have no commitment to truth whatsoever. They
will tell any lie and commit any atrocity which leads
to their goals: power and wealth. Even if one were the
host of a radio or TV interview program, trying to dialogue
with a person such as George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald
Rumsfield, Condoleeza Rice, or Karl Rove would be a total
waste of time. Their entire output would be nothing but
sophistry and propaganda: lies, obfuscations, and posturings.
A person like Hermogenes can believe that truth can
be expressed in words without knowing how to express truth
in words. But if a person doesn't believe there is a reality
named "truth," then there is no purpose in engaging
in dialectic--searching for truth--when they don't believe
there is truth.
Some people say they believe there is truth, when what
they really believe is that each person's beliefs express
an individual, subjective truth. This is the denial of
the reality of Truth, which is invariable, not subjective,
possessing a fixed reality of its own, as Socrates explains.
"It is clear that things have some fixed reality
of their own, not in relation to us nor caused by us;
they do not vary, swaying one way and another in accordance
with our fancy, but exist of themselves in relation to
their own reality imposed by nature." [386e] [...]
Entities and actions have a fixed nature and are not
subjective in the sense of having a reality relative to
a person's beliefs. A name is, Socrates explains, an instrument
for separating one kind of reality from another, a horse
from a human, for example. Each name refers to a fixed
reality. Even if we change a name referring to a specific
reality, the reality is the same.
If a propagandist such as Dubya, with the clear intention
of deceiving, gives the false name of democracy to the
forms of government in America and Iraq, he's still referring
to the same, objective realities: American plutocracy
(the rule of the wealthy) and Iraqi puppet government.
False and deceptive names are used by indoctrinators to
try to fool heedless people into believing they're referring
to a reality (true democracy: a government for the people)
when they're not. [...]
The search for truth is a serious matter, and Socrates
is engaged in an earnest investigation into questions
of critical importance--then and now. It's possible for
a society to become so relativistic and intellectually
bewildered that people lose the ability to comprehend
reality. War is seen as peace. Tyranny is seen as sound
government. An illiterate, degenerate President is seen
as a great leader. Ignorance becomes suicidal. Intentional
unawareness becomes lethal. [...]
Part of what Socrates is investigating is the phenomenon
of our possessing a knowledge of reality in our very being.
Entities have a definite, unique composition; one thing
is not another thing. We know, primordially, when we are
in our right mind, whether a name correctly or incorrectly
refers to a particular reality. Mind control, propaganda,
and social conditioning can so corrupt the human mind
that it does not function correctly; then lies are taken
for truth, our destroyers are taken for beneficent leaders.
But even when programmed by an oppressive regime, humans
retain some connection to their primordial awareness of
reality.
The American mind is very far gone: people suffer from
generalized possession 9 and hysteria 10-- the loss of
the ability to use our senses and our minds. But there
is still a preexistent, ineradicable power of understanding
in even the most subverted personality that can be awakened.
There has to be this primordial ability to understand
reality because we recognize when a name correctly or
incorrectly refers to a particular entity. If we required
a name in order to recognize a reality, then we would
never have been able to know realities and know when names
are correct. [...]
As we examine instances of government, for example--America,
Britain, fifth century BCE Athens, the 1776 Constitution
of Pennsylvania--we find that none of them contains the
total reality which we primordially know to be Good Government.
Intuitively, we recognize that Good Government does
not involve a leader lying to the people, a regime supporting
only the rich and impoverishing the poor. With each investigation
of a particular government, we find a specific aspect
of the reality--Good Government--we apprehend in our inner
being. Thus there must a complete totality, a wholeness--Good
Government--to which the particulars point and which they
embody partially. There must be Forms of which Plato spoke.
Unless there were Forms, we could not name, since naming
presupposes the existence of unchanging natures by reference
to which names are meaningful and correct.
We recognize that the form, Good Government, is embodied
partially in each of these particular instances of government.
What we experience are partial and ever-changing embodiments
of Good Government only. But this very actuality implies
a changeless, eduring reality embodied in all the instances
and containing the perfection of the Idea or Form. [...]
When we use the words "Good Government" in
speaking to people, they intuitively know what those words
mean. That implies, as we've seen, that they have a primordial
knowledge of the reality of Good Government. If humans
didn't possess a preexistent awareness of realities--including
Forms-- then we could not communicate, since human communication
presupposes meaning. [...]
With Socrates' enlightened use of dialectic the dangers
of everyday discourse are countered. In common verbal
interchange a word such as "Democracy" can cease
to serve its natural function of pointing to a reality
we all know. The word "Democracy" is uttered
by Bush continually, but is no longer used to make manifest
a specific nature. It is simply tossed back and forth
between people who have a vague feeling that it means
something posit ive but have no genuine grasp of the reality
to which it refers. Bush propagandists deliberately misidentify
the word "Democracy" so that it ceases to serve
the function of referring to genuine Democracy.
Even a reality such as "right speech" is known
by people intuitively. So someone who uses words in any
way he pleases is not speaking correctly. A person must
speak according to the way in which things are correctly
spoken of, in the way that words refer to a specific reality
that we know.
We must regain the understanding, taught by Perennialist
sages throughout the ages, that there is a magic in language
which contributes to human evolution. Language in some
way creates the very world in which we live. Words and
concepts point to realities beyond the sensory world and
assist us in making contact with a higher dimension.
Intangible Ideas, in Plato's conception--supersensible
realities beyond human thought--are appropriated through
words, as birds in our hands, and released by the act
of discernment, setting the birds free. These Ideas reside
in the words independent of the books or the sounds in
which the words are encased.
Humans today are rapidly losing the intellectual ability
to realize or be concerned that their very lives are threatened
by the loss of the ability to use language to understand
and communicate. As Thomas Jefferson made clear, "no
people can be both ignorant and free." [...]
Contemporary Bush junta propagandists do not even feel
the need to disguise their deliberate lies and deceptions.
In a recent speech to a captive audience (people screened
to ensure Republican sympathies), Bush indicated that
his job was "catapulting the propaganda" about
Social Security. The Bush junta now broadcasts propaganda
disguised as "news stories," witholds vital
information from members of Congress, and lies with impunity
at every turn.
Even though many Americans have been taken in by this
propaganda, we can be sure--as Plato's dialogues demonstrate--that
there is still some primordial understanding of enduring
realities in all humans. A heartening example of this
awareness is now manifesting in the increasing number
of Americans who are seeing Bush's war on Iraq as a war
crime perpetrated for oil, American corporate profits,
and the restructuring of the Middle East. Their awakening
to this reality means that the Bush military is now having
immense difficulty in recruiting men and women as cannon
fodder for their senseless wars of aggression.
The awareness of the essence of Good Government is also
reawakening in Americans in increasing numbers. Ultimately,
this preexisstent knowledge of reality will make it clear
to Americans that the criminal cabal that has seized their
government is working against the best interests of U.S.
citizens. In our arsenal against the current tyranny,
one of our most potent weapons is a penetrating understanding
of the wisdom embodied in Plato's dialogues. |
WASHINGTON, June 10
(UPI) -- The U.S. Justice Department says a CIA official
blocked a memo warning the FBI two Sept. 11 hijackers
had entered the country before the attacks.
The memo, prepared by an FBI agent on the CIA's special
Osama bin Laden unit, was meant to be transmitted in
January 2000, the Los Angeles Times reported Friday.
The information could have helped
agents track down the al-Qaida operatives before the
attacks took place, the Times quoted U.S. intelligence
officials familiar with the Justice Department report
as saying.
Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine released
the report after winning a court battle against officials
involved with the case of alleged would-be hijacker
Zacarias Moussaoui. The officials had attempted to block
release of the report, claiming it could compromise
the outcome of his case. The section on Moussaoui was
deleted from the released report.
The report said it was not known
why the CIA official, identified by the fictitious name
"John," put a hold on the warning.
|
Some really scary
things are happening around here these days.
Congress has become a place of great incivility and
rancor, which threaten to undermine any hope of legislative
remedy to a myriad of problems, from Social Security
to soaring health-care costs to immigration to a steadily
crumbling manufacturing base once the envy of the world.
But perhaps the most frightening
prospect for Americans is an unfettered national police
force with the sole discretion to determine who can
be investigated as a potential terrorist. That's
the impact of little-known proposals to greatly expand
the powers of the FBI, permitting its agents to seize
business records without a warrant and to track the
mail of those in terrorist inquiries without regard
to Postal Service concerns.
Because the government can label almost any group or
individual a terrorist threat, the potential for abuse
by not having to show probable cause is enormous, prompting
civil libertarians to correctly speculate about who
will guard against the guardians. Up until now the answer
was the Constitution as interpreted by the judiciary.
But it is clear that sidestepping
any such restriction is the real and present danger
of the post-9-11 era.
A wise man, the late Sen. John Williams of Delaware,
once counseled that any proposed legislation should
be regarded in the light of its worst potential consequence,
particularly when it came to laws that enhance the investigative
and prosecutorial powers of the government at the expense
of civil rights. This is most likely to occur in times
of national stress, when the Constitution is always
vulnerable to assault _ i.e., the internment of Japanese-Americans
during World War II. The scenario Williams warned about
runs something like this.
You are innocently standing on a street corner waiting
to cross when you are approached by a complete stranger
who politely, but in a low voice, asks directions to
a certain address or area. You, of course, are utterly
unaware that the person is under surveillance in a terrorist
investigation. You respond in a friendly manner. And
although the exchange takes only a few seconds, it is
enough to make those following the suspect curious about
you. You are identified and a background check reveals
that you or your spouse has a relative of Middle Eastern
extraction or that you recently traveled to a Middle
Eastern country or that you contributed to a charity
bazaar sponsored by a church or group under suspicion
of passing money through to a terrorist cause.
Suddenly, you are caught in a major inquiry, your personal
business records are seized and your mail is tracked.
It doesn't take long for your friends and neighbors
to learn that you are being investigated, and the result
of that is predictable. You and your family are shunned.
Your business begins to dwindle and before the nightmare
has ended, which can take months, your life is in shambles.
The truth never catches up with the fiction and the
bureau, which has difficulty in saying the word "sorry,"
leaves you high and dry, twisting slowly in the wind.
Think it can't happen that way? Well,
it does all the time. Ask the lawyer in Oregon whom
the FBI misidentified as having taken part in the terrorist
bombing of the Spanish railway. Ask any number of persons
since Sept. 11, 2001, arrested and detained for months
without charges or counsel before they were released.
If that isn't enough to satisfy you about the inadvisability
of these proposals, think back to the Cold War days
when the most casual acquaintance with a group or person
on J. Edgar Hoover's anti-communist watch list could
land one in water hot enough to make life miserable
for a long time _ maybe even put him or her on one of
the infamous blacklists.
If you weren't around in those times, read about them.
One thing you will learn quickly is that the sole determination
of who or what had communist inclinations belonged to
the FBI. Even then, however, Congress was smart enough
not to rescind the checks and balances that protect
our civil liberties. Federal law-enforcement officers
outside the FBI have complained of late about the bureau's
penchant for seizing jurisdiction over almost any crime
by relating it to terrorism.
Both of these over-reactive proposals are as fearsome
as the threat of another al Qaeda attack, for they accomplish
the same thing: the intrusion on and disruption of the
rights of Americans. Like portions of the Patriot Act,
which are rightly being challenged by conservatives
as well as liberals, they are medicine worse than the
cancer.
|
SACRAMENTO, Calif.
(Reuters) - The FBI has arrested a Pakistani-American
father and son living in California after the son admitted
to attending an al Qaeda training camp in Pakistan,
U.S. officials said Wednesday.
Hamid Hayat, 23, and his father, Umer, 45, of Lodi,
35 miles south of state capital Sacramento, were taken
into custody over the weekend. Both men are being held
in Sacramento on charges of lying to federal authorities.
"We believe through our
investigation that various individuals connected to
al Qaeda have been operating in the Lodi area in various
capacities," Keith Slotter, special agent
in charge of the FBI office in Sacramento, told reporters.
These involve "individuals who have received terrorist
training abroad with the specific intent to initiate
a terrorist attack in the United States and to harm
Americans and our institutions."
The United States has launched numerous terrorism prosecutions
with great fanfare since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks,
although many cases later fizzled out.
Two other men were arrested
in Lodi for violating terms of their visas, said
Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman Dean Boyd.
The men have been identified as Muhammad Adil Khan --
an imam at Farooqia Islamic Center -- and Shabbir Ahmed,
also an imam in Lodi, an administration source said.
"We are a peace-loving people; we have never done
anything to violate the laws of the United States,"
a fellow Islamic leader, Taj Khan, told reporters in
Lodi. "We love this country as much as anyone else."
PAKISTAN TRAINING
According to an FBI affidavit,
Hamid Hayat told agents he attended an al Qaeda training
camp in Pakistan for about six months in 2003 and 2004.
"Hamid further stated that he and others at the
camp were being trained on how to kill Americans,"
the affidavit said.
"Hamid advised that he specifically requested
to come to the United States to carry out his jihad
mission," the document said. "Potential targets
for attack would include hospitals and large food stores.
During weapons training, photos of President Bush
and other high-ranking U.S. political figures were pasted
onto targets.
Neighbor Leslie Korb, who lives across the street,
said Umer Hayat, who called himself Michael, drove an
ice cream truck and had recently completed a course
to become a welder. He said Umer
had said the family went to Pakistan because the mother
needed a liver transplant. "He
was very cordial," he said. "I've never seen
anything unusual."
|
Re: GOP
Chairmain Walks Out of Meeting
WASHINGTON -- The Republican chairman walked off
with the gavel, leaving Democrats shouting into turned-off
microphones at a raucous hearing Friday on the Patriot
Act.
Video of the above event may be found here
(Quicktime, 17MB).
It is as depressing as MP Galloway's recent testimony
was invigorating.
If history books ever get written about this "time"
and place, the above scene will merit some mention I
think; any semblence of an opposition to Bush Reich's
Patriot Act II uttering its last words in the hallowed
halls of congress. |
WASHINGTON - A closed-door vote
by the Senate Intelligence Committee last week to expand
law enforcement powers under the USA Patriot Act is
prompting sharp criticism from
some conservative leaders who are otherwise among the
most vocal allies of President Bush and the Republican
leadership in Congress.
The conservative leaders - who have formed a coalition
with critics on the left, including the American Civil
Liberties Union - vowed to press their concerns in coming
days with public statements, rallies and radio advertisements
in key congressional districts.
The conservatives, including former U.S. Rep. Bob
Barr (R-Ga.) and political activists who have been long-standing
critics of the anti-terrorism law, lashed out with particular
force last week against the White House, members of
Congress and Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales. They said
they had expected a more open review of the Patriot
Act in which lawmakers considered some limits in order
to safeguard civil liberties.
The conservatives complained
that the Senate panel had moved in secret to expand
the act. They are particularly upset about proposed
"administrative subpoenas" that would let
the FBI obtain a person's medical, financial and other
records in terrorism cases without seeking a judge's
approval.
Their criticism gathered force as Bush devoted two
public events last week to pressing Congress to renew
parts of the act due to expire at the end of this year.
The White House and the congressional leadership generally
enjoy enthusiastic support from conservative activist
organizations, though the Republican base has experienced
profound disagreements over the decision to add a prescription
drug benefit to Medicare and over the general expansion
of government under President Bush.
But now, said conservative activist
Grover Norquist, every major conservative grass-roots
organization has expressed concern about expanding the
Patriot Act. He emphasized
that his concern was directed not at the White House
but at Congress. Other conservative leaders, however,
are aiming their criticism at both ends of Pennsylvania
Avenue.
"It is a slap in the face to the Constitution,"
said Barr, who leads a bipartisan coalition calling
for limits on the act.
Passed six weeks after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001,
the Patriot Act was intended to give law enforcement
more power to fight terrorism. But Barr and other critics
say the law goes too far and gives federal investigators
unbridled power that endangers civil rights. The proposed
"administrative subpoenas" approved by the
intelligence panel last week would "wipe away the
4th Amendment" protection against unreasonable
searches, Barr said.
Barr also accused the president of giving "the
back of his hand" to concerns about constitutional
protections "that so many have fought and died
for." [...]
Although Barr, Keene and a handful of other well-known
conservatives are working with groups on the political
left to limit the Patriot Act, Keene
rejected arguments from the left that "there is
a Republican plot to deprive of us of our rights. The
fact is, this is what governments do," regardless
of who is in power, particularly in time of war. [...]
Barr voted for the bill when he was in Congress and,
like Keene, he insists he wants most of the 16 expiring
sections renewed. In testimony on Capitol Hill, Barr
said his coalition sought modest modifications of the
law, such as limiting the length of time and number
of targets covered by a roving wiretap. [...] |
WASHINGTON (AP) - Howard Dean said
Saturday that positive responses from key supporters
have reinforced his determination to keep talking tough.
Some congressional Democrats have suggested that the
party chairman should tone down his rhetoric.
"People want us to fight,"
Dean told the national party's executive committee.
"We are here to fight."
Over the past week, Dean described Republicans as "pretty
much a white, Christian party" and said many in
the GOP "never made an honest living."
Several Democratic lawmakers distanced themselves from
their chairman. Republican officials called on him to
apologize. After weathering the criticism, Dean forged
ahead with the GOP scolding at the meeting of Democratic
National Committee leaders.
Yet some Democrats say the former Vermont governor
should not remain the center of attention.
"Privately, people have said they don't want Howard
Dean to become the story because we have more important
issues to talk about," said Donna Brazile, who
managed Al Gore's presidential campaign in 2000.
"But publicly we will continue to give Howard
Dean our strong support," she said.
One of Dean's predecessors at the DNC, Don Fowler said,
"The controversy over this statement or that statement
is a blip and only a blip." But Fowler complained
about leading Democrats who aired their gripes last
week. "Even if they don't like it, they should
have enough sense not to make those comments,"
Fowler said.
At the session in a downtown hotel,
Dean accused Republicans of trying to suppress the vote,
selling access to the White House for lobbyists and
basically being dishonest with the public.
"The reason the Republicans are in trouble is
because there are so many cases where they say one thing
and do something else," Dean said.
He said President Bush's education
initiative, the "No Child Left Behind" program,
cuts school spending and a clean environment plan, the
"Clear Skies Initiative," permits more pollution.
A spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee
said Dean would rather sling mud than discuss serious
matters.
"Dean's inflammatory rhetoric makes it clear that
Democrats have no vision and would rather pander to
the maniacal fringe than talk about the important issues
facing our country," Tracey Schmitt said.
On political fundraising, the
DNC trails the Republican Party by more than 2-to-1
despite Dean's reputation as a potent fundraiser.
The Democrats have raised almost $19 million so far
this year. [...] |
Ministers
were warned in July 2002 that Britain was committed
to taking part in an American-led invasion of Iraq and
they had no choice but to find a way of making it legal.
The warning, in a leaked Cabinet Office briefing paper,
said Tony Blair had already agreed to back military
action to get rid of Saddam Hussein at a summit at the
Texas ranch of President George W Bush three months
earlier.
The briefing paper, for participants at a meeting of
Blair's inner circle on July 23, 2002, said that since
regime change was illegal it was "necessary to
create the conditions" which would make it legal.
This was required because, even if ministers decided
Britain should not take part in an invasion, the American
military would be using British bases. This would automatically
make Britain complicit in any illegal US action.
"US plans assume, as a minimum, the use of British
bases in Cyprus and Diego Garcia," the briefing
paper warned. This meant that issues of legality "would
arise virtually whatever option ministers choose with
regard to UK participation".
The paper was circulated to those present at the meeting,
among whom were Blair, Geoff Hoon, then defence secretary,
Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, and Sir Richard Dearlove,
then chief of MI6. The full minutes of the meeting were
published last month in The Sunday Times.
The document said the only way the allies could justify
military action was to place Saddam Hussein in a position
where he ignored or rejected a United Nations ultimatum
ordering him to co-operate with the weapons inspectors.
But it warned this would be difficult.
"It is just possible that an ultimatum could be
cast in terms which Saddam would reject," the document
says. But if he accepted it and did not attack the allies,
they would be "most unlikely" to obtain the
legal justification they needed.
The suggestions that the allies use the UN to justify
war contradicts claims by Blair and Bush, repeated during
their Washington summit last week, that they turned
to the UN in order to avoid having to go to war. The
attack on Iraq finally began in March 2003.
The briefing paper is certain to add to the pressure,
particularly on the American president, because of the
damaging revelation that Bush
and Blair agreed on regime change in April 2002
and then looked for a way to justify
it.
There has been a growing storm of protest in America,
created by last month's publication of the minutes in
The Sunday Times. A host of citizens, including many
internet bloggers, have demanded to know why the Downing
Street memo (often shortened to "the DSM"
on websites) has been largely ignored by the US mainstream
media.
The White House has declined to respond to a letter
from 89 Democratic congressmen asking if it was true
- as Dearlove told the July meeting - that "the
intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy"
in Washington.
The Downing Street memo burst into the mainstream American
media only last week after it was raised at a joint
Bush-Blair press conference, forcing the prime minister
to insist that "the facts were not fixed in any
shape or form at all".
John Conyers, the Democratic congressman who drafted
the letter to Bush, has now written to Dearlove asking
him to say whether or not it was accurate that he believed
the intelligence was being "fixed" around
the policy. He also asked the former MI6 chief precisely
when Bush and Blair had agreed to invade Iraq and whether
it is true they agreed to "manufacture" the
UN ultimatum in order to justify the war.
He and other Democratic congressmen plan to hold their
own inquiry this Thursday with witnesses including Joe
Wilson, the American former ambassador who went to Niger
to investigate claims that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium
ore for its nuclear weapons programme.
Frustrated at the refusal by
the White House to respond to their letter, the congressmen
have set up a website - www.downingstreetmemo.com
- to collect signatures on a
petition demanding the same answers.
Conyers promised to deliver it to
Bush once it reached 250,000 signatures. By Friday morning
it already had more than 500,000 with as many as 1m
expected to have been obtained when he delivers it to
the White House on Thursday.
AfterDowningStreet.org, another website set up as a
result of the memo, is calling for a congressional committee
to consider whether Bush's actions as depicted in the
memo constitute grounds for impeachment.
It has been flooded with visits from
people angry at what they see as media self-censorship
in ignoring the memo. It claims to have attracted more
than 1m hits a day.
Democrats.com, another website, even offered $1,000
to any journalist who quizzed Bush about the memo's
contents, although the Reuters reporter who asked the
question last Tuesday was not aware of the reward and
has no intention of claiming it.
The complaints of media self-censorship have been backed
up by the ombudsmen of The Washington Post, The New
York Times and National Public Radio, who have questioned
the lack of attention the minutes have received from
their organisations.
|
PARIS -- In July 2002, the head
of MI-6, Britain's secret intelligence service, briefed
Prime Minister Tony Blair and his cabinet on U.S. plans
to attack Iraq.
Sir Richard Dearlove ("M" to James Bond
fans) reported that U.S. President George Bush had decided
to invade oil-rich Iraq in March 2003, in a war "to
be justified by the conjunction of terrorism and weapons
of mass destruction. The intelligence and facts are
being fixed around the policy."
Translation: The U.S. and British governments would
concoct charges against Iraq to justify war.
After Britain's attorney general
warned that unprovoked invasion of Iraq would violate
international law, Dearlove opined with oily cynicism,
"If the political context were right, people would
support regime change." Translation:
Use propaganda and scare tactics to whip up war fever.
British and U.S. intelligence agencies
were ordered to produce "evidence" to justify
a war. In the U.S., faked "evidence" and grotesque
lies were fed to the frightened public by pro-war neo-conservatives
and frenzied national media. The U.S. Congress clapped
for war like trained seals.
In October 2002, Bush actually claimed in a national
speech that Iraqi "drone" aircraft were poised
to shower germs and poison gas on America. Vice-President
Dick Cheney insisted this absurd allegation was the
"smoking gun" that justified invading Iraq.
Blair ordered his cabinet to support the invasion.
Bush, in his subsequent State of the Union speech,
warned that Iraq was importing uranium from Niger to
build nuclear weapons aimed at the U.S. This ludicrous
claim was based on a forged document. The forgery was
back-channelled to the Pentagon through neo-fascists
in Italian military intelligence.
And so it went. Lie after lie. Scare
upon scare. Fakery after fakery, trumpeted by the tame
media that came to resemble the lickspittle press of
the old Soviet Union. Ironically, in the end, horrid
Saddam Hussein turned out to be telling the truth all
along, while Bush and Blair were not.
MI-6's smoking-gun memo, revealed for the first time
last month in London by the Sunday Times, would have
forced any of Europe's democratic governments to resign
in disgrace. But not Bush and Blair. Far from it. Though
hounded over his Iraq lies by Britain's media, Blair
squeaked through a tight election thanks only to the
pathetically inept opposition Conservatives, who also
backed the Iraq war.
By contrast, U.S. mass media amply confirmed charges
of bias and politicization levelled against them by
first ignoring the MI-6 memo story, then grudgingly
devoting a few low-key stories to the dramatic revelation.
Front pages, meanwhile, featured outing of the Nixon
era's "Deep Throat," who, it turned out, was
part of a cabal of Nixon-haters rather than a selfless
patriot.
In retrospect, former president Richard
Nixon's misdeeds appear trivial compared to Bush's illegal,
unnecessary and catastrophic war against Iraq, which
has so far killed some 100,000 Iraqis and Americans,
cost $275 billion US, and made America's name mud around
the globe.
But as Nazi bigwig Herman Goering
observed correctly, a government can get away with anything
provided it scares its citizens enough.
France and Germany both knew from their own intelligence
services that the Anglo-U.S. accusations against Iraq
were nonsense and Saddam was no threat to anyone save
his own miserable people.
That is why they refused to join the war in spite
of U.S. threats and tempting offers of oil concessions
in postwar Iraq. Britain readily accepted.
The U.S. ordered its intelligence services to shut
their eyes, toe the White House party line and accept
as genuine patently false reports about the Mideast
from known disinformers and self-serving sources that
wanted to see Iraq destroyed.
But don't just blame Bush and Blair. VP Cheney, CIA
boss George Tenet (aka "Dr. Yes"), Colin Powell,
Condoleezza Rice and other senior administration officials
who promoted falsehoods over Iraq and war fever were
just as guilty of deceiving and misleading the American
people and Congress.
Kudos go to Blair's former foreign secretary, Robin
Cook, who refused to be party to the lies and resigned.
No senior U.S. official had the guts or ethics to follow
Cook's admirable example. |
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A
former oil industry lobbyist who changed government reports
on global warming has resigned in a long-planned departure,
the White House said Saturday.
Philip Cooney, who was chief of staff
of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, left
Friday, two days after it was revealed that he had edited
administration reports on climate change in 2002 and 2003.
His departure was "completely
unrelated" to the disclosure, White House spokeswoman
Dana Perino said.[...]
Based on documents provided to the Government Accountability
Project, a nonprofit group that helps whistle-blowers,
The New York Times first reported Wednesday that Cooney
made changes in several federal environmental reports.
The changes tended to emphasize the uncertainty of evidence
that greenhouse-gas emissions are causing global temperatures
to rise.
Cooney, a lawyer without a background
in science, once headed the oil industry's lobbying on
climate change.
The White House defended the changes, saying they were
part of the normal, wide-ranging review process and did
not violate an administration pledge to rely on sound
science. |
A
pro-Iraq war US congressman who campaigned for French
fries to be renamed "freedom fries" is now calling
for US troops to return home from Iraq.
Republican Representative Walter Jones is to introduce
legislation demanding a timetable for the withdrawal.
The renaming of fries in Capitol Hill's cafeterias in
March 2003 expressed disapproval among some US lawmakers
with France's opposition to the war.
French toast was also re-branded "freedom toast".
"I voted for the resolution to commit the troops,
and I feel that we've done about as much as we can do,"
Mr Jones said on US network ABC.
"I just feel that the reason of
going in for weapons of mass destruction, the ability
of the Iraqis to make a nuclear weapon, that's all been
proven that it was never there."
He said his change of heart about the war came after
he attended the funeral of a US sergeant killed in Nasiriya,
Iraq, in April 2003. Mr Jones said he was moved by the
soldier's widow who read out her husband's last letter.
"And that really has been on my mind and my heart
ever since," he said.
Mr Jones, who represents North Carolina, has written
condolences letters to the families of more than 1,300
servicemen killed in Iraq, and photographs of those killed
in action are posted outside his congressional office.
|
(UK) - The more we learn about
the Government's plan for pay-per-mile motoring, the
more shocking and frightening it becomes.
This project will involve the most
intrusive system for spying on the citizens ever proposed
in a civilised state. Hitler and Stalin would have relished
such a scheme.
High overhead, 24 hours a day, satellites will monitor
the movements of all 30 million vehicles in Britain.
We will be unable to make the shortest journey without
the trip being seen, logged and duly billed.
Britain's speed-trap cameras will become redundant
overnight. Any breaches of the speed limit could be
detected from thousands of miles in space and duly punished
by computer-generated fines.
You may wish to see a new church,
join a social club or visit the headquarters of a political
party. All will be known. All will be logged.
This is an Orwellian nightmare. It is astonishing
and deeply depressing that politicians who were raised
in a liberal, freedom-loving society could even contemplate
such a thing.
And yet where is the opposition to it? Where are the
MPs defending British liberties?
We are told that all the major political parties support
this spy-in-the-sky scheme. The BBC, slavishly toeing
the Downing Street line, describes the project as requiring
"political courage".
Poor, bemused Joe Public is left as uninformed and
powerless as ever.
How did such a scheme come to be? Did it appear in
any party election manifesto? Was it mentioned in a
single pre-election speech?
Of course not. This draconian affront to our civil
liberties has simply gone through on the nod. The right
of the state to know every detail of our private lives
is taken for granted.
This state-spy project has been launched in the guise
of protecting the environment and reducing gridlock.
And if you believe that, you'll believe anything.
[...] |
Blood
Group |
Global Eye
By Chris Floyd
Published: June 10, 2005 |
The history of politics is the
history of factions jostling for power, by methods seldom
peaceful and rarely, if ever, honest. War is by far
the preferred means of obtaining and augmenting domination
of the political landscape and the enrichment of the
ruling clique.
Sometimes this means violent civil strife within the
state itself. At other times, the political tool of
war is directed outwards, at some demonized enemy who
poses a "threat" -- which is almost always
exaggerated or illusory -- to national survival. Without
fail, the warmongering faction's political opponents
are identified with the enemy, either as direct agents
or, more often, as unpatriotic abettors whose criticism
of the rulers gives "aid and comfort" to the
foe.
Blood is an excellent sealant for factional unity.
Once lives have been taken in pursuit of the faction's
interests, which are invariably dressed up in the rhetoric
of moral purpose, it becomes much harder for the faction's
members to question or quit the cause. To do so means
confessing not just to error but to complicity in murder.
Few are those who can face such a stark unmasking. Self-deception
is vital coin in the economy of factional partisanship.
Of course, some factions are more venal, more violent
and more ambitious than others. Many factions are content
with a mere piece of the action, a cut of the spoils.
Although occasionally they might win through to the
top rank of power, they don't seek to eliminate all
their rivals and establish permanent rule. But history
provides many examples of ruthless factions whose thirst
for control is unlimited. They seek and will accept
no less than a profound transformation of state and
society into the image of the faction itself, using
any method to achieve this goal. They will begin with
peaceful means but will not balk at bloodshed if required.
And of course, to impose a narrow partisan vision on
an entire society inevitably requires mass bloodletting
in the end.
By no means are such towering ambitions always unsuccessful.
This is one of the great unspoken
truths of history: In many different places and times,
empires, caliphates, dynasties and other systems of
factional dominion have been established through enormous
evil -- and then persisted in power for centuries, lauded
as honorable, legitimate governments. In time,
their domination comes to be seen as a fact of nature,
the way things are. There is no other way to think,
to operate, to exist outside the parameters imposed
by the ruling worldview.
Western civilization is founded upon this kind of
enduring factional triumph. Octavian, the teenage adventurer
adopted by his distant kinsman Julius Caesar, parlayed
the chaos of Rome's partisan strife into supreme power,
using corruption, deceit, betrayal, murder, civil war
and foreign conquest as his political instruments. With
a bloody single-mindedness and a scope that would not
be seen in Europe again until the 20th century, he subsumed
the entire state into his faction, merging and equating
the two, leaving nothing outside the new reality created
by his violent success.
There was no ideological, moral or even genuine political
content at the heart of his faction. Its only goal was
power, Octavian's personal power, from which his adherents
hoped to obtain offices, land, loot and prestige --
or protection from the ravages of other factions. Only
later, on the razed ground of total victory, was this
remorseless, murderous game mythologized into a selfless
crusade for national security, for order, liberty, prosperity
and, yes, for "family values." Only then,
when the dead lay rotting by the hundreds of thousands,
was the young man accorded the lofty title that carried
him into history as a beacon of civilization: Augustus.
The system he established so brutally was maintained
-- with equal brutality for all who opposed it -- for
more than 1,400 years.
At first glance, it might seem absurd to compare this
grand figure of world history to the gang of apish,
third-rate poltroons now camped out along the Potomac.
But although Octavian's faction contained a handful
of remarkably able figures, for the most part it was
a collection of schemers, time-servers, cynical money-men,
stunted ideologues, bootlickers, propagandists and thugs.
Through bribes, threats and the reflected glory of Caesar's
name, Octavian was able to augment his tawdry crew with
the fearsome military power of many legions.
Armed might -- and the willingness to use it without
remorse or moral compunction -- is always the decisive
factor in politics.
The brutal system of torture,
corruption, lawlessness and war established in Washington
by the faction of President George W. Bush is now backed
by the greatest military power in history, able to wipe
whole nations from the face of the earth in minutes.
With the illegal invasion of Iraq and the illegal imprisonment
of thousands of people in its global gulag, this faction
has shown its willingness to use military force without
remorse or moral compunction in pursuit of its openly-stated
totalitarian vision: "full-spectrum dominance"
over geopolitical affairs coupled with a radical "transformation"
of domestic government into a centralized, militarized
"instrument of national power" that breaks
down "the old, rigid divisions between war, peace,
diplomacy, conflict and reconstruction," as Pentagon
chief Donald Rumsfeld outlined last month. This
"instrument" is designed not for the people's
benefit but to provide "maximum flexibility"
for the commander-in-chief -- whose powers are not subject
to U.S. or international law, says Bush's legal
team.
Is such a faction, so steeped in blood and lies, so
ravenous for domination, ever likely to resign its power
voluntarily through free, unfixed elections? Or will
it not seek to extend its rule, by any means necessary,
into the years and centuries beyond? |
ELEANOR HALL: Civil liberty groups
in New South Wales are warning today that proposed new
counter-terrorism laws could turn New South Wales into
a police state.
They're raising the alarm about legislation that the
Carr Government has introduced into the State's parliament,
which would allow police to secretly search homes and
offices to target terrorists.
The civil libertarians say they're
concerned that the laws could be misused, with one of
their biggest fears being that secret searches could
be used to plant false evidence.
In Sydney, Brendan Trembath reports.
BRENDAN TREMBATH: The New South
Wales Government wants to give police the power to
search any premises secretly
so as not to tip-off suspected terrorists they're investigating.
The Government argues terrorist groups are especially
secretive, more so than other criminals.
But it's not a strong enough argument for civil libertarians,
who worry covert searches could be wide open to abuse.
CAMERON MURPHY: I don't think that this provides any
further assistance in any effort to combat terrorism.
What it does do is open up the way for further police
corruption.
BRENDAN TREMBATH: Cameron Murphy is the President
of the Council for Civil Liberties.
So-called "sneak and peak" warrants have
not been used in Australia, but have overseas, from
time to time in the United States, especially to investigate
drug dealing.
Law enforcement researchers say the warrants are attractive
to law enforcement groups, but menacing to the courts.
Cameron Murphy from the Civil Liberties Council says
the US experience discredits their use.
CAMERON MURPHY: The first line
of defence against police corruption is knowing that
the police have a warrant, and that they're in your
premises, and knowing what they're searching for. Otherwise,
what's to stop a police officer planting something,
then going and obtaining a warrant based on the outcome
of the sneak-and-peek warrant to seize that and prosecute
somebody.
BRENDAN TREMBATH: The secret search warrants proposed
in New South Wales would be issued by the Supreme Court.
The court would be closed for such applications so media
scrutiny is hampered.
Police or Crime Commission officers would have to
report back to the court on the result of the search.
The occupant would be informed of
the search eventually, though it may be as long as two
years later.
The main proponent, New South Wales Attorney General
Bob Debus, says police need wider powers to preserve
the element of surprise.
BOB DEBUS: I just want to emphasise in this context,
Mr Speaker, that these powers have got nothing to do
with secret policing.
Secret policing involves the exercise of powers by
police without independent oversight, without accountability,
and those sorts of powers might involve the surveillance
of law abiding members of the community who are considered
suspect in some way due to their social or their political
leanings. Indeed, that term secret
policing evokes the fear of the knock on the door in
the middle of the night that has been known in totalitarian
societies like Hitler's Germany or Stalin's Soviet Union.
These powers are not secret policing powers.
BRENDAN TREMBATH: David Vaile from the Australian
Privacy Foundation says if the law passes, the real
test of its fairness will be how closely the use of
the warrants is supervised by the courts.
DAVID VAILE: So that it's not just somebody gets a
suspicion about something and decides that without much
further scrutiny they'll just go off and order these
activities, which start to sound,
I must say, very much like the sort of thing you'd expect
in a traditional police state. |
OTTAWA (CP) - Canada's
secret eavesdropping agency is undergoing its biggest
expansion in decades as it takes on a greater role in
the fight against terrorism.
The clandestine Communications Security Establishment,
a wing of the Defence Department that snoops on foreign
conversations and messages, has made its primary mission
the countering of dangerous extremists.
Staff levels at the Ottawa-based CSE are expected
to jump to 1,650 from about 950 before the Sept. 11,
2001, attacks on the United States by Osama bin Laden's
al-Qaida network.
The spy agency's annual budget will reach $220 million
by 2007-08, a 57 per cent increase over pre-9/11 levels.
"Over the past year, CSE has significantly expanded
its security intelligence focus and collection capabilities,"
says a recent federal report on national security projects.
At CSE's unassuming headquarters, computer whizzes,
mathematicians and language specialists sift and sort
intercepted data to help analysts create reports for
other government security agencies.
Military listening posts across the
country assist CSE's efforts to eavesdrop on suspected
spies, terrorists and other criminals as well as process
information helpful to Canada's foreign policy interests
and soldiers posted abroad.
Intelligence provided by CSE "has been directly
responsible for helping to protect Canadian troops in
Afghanistan from terrorist attack," agency chief
Keith Coulter recently told a Commons committee.
"I can also say that CSE has provided intelligence
on foreign terrorist targets used to protect the safety
and interest of Canadians and our closest allies."
Coulter credits new powers in the Anti-Terrorism Act,
ushered in following Sept. 11, that give CSE more flexibility.
As a foreign intelligence agency,
CSE is still forbidden from focusing its spy efforts
specifically on Canadians. However, the act permits
the defence minister to authorize CSE operations even
if doing so risks intercepting some communications,
such as a phone call, involving Canadians.
Should this happen, the law allows CSE to use information
deemed essential to international affairs, defence or
security. [...] |
A French journalist
and her Iraqi assistant have been released after being
held hostage for five months.
Florence Aubenas, a reporter for the daily Libération,
and her interpreter and guide, Hussein Hanoun, are in
good health, France's foreign minister said.
Aubenas, 44, arrived at an airstrip west of Paris Sunday
aboard a plane chartered by the French government.
President Jacques Chirac greeted Aubenas with a kiss
on the cheek after she landed in Villacoublay.
She hugged her family then told reporters that she had
been tied up and blindfolded in a cellar for months.
The journalist, who appeared relaxed and made jokes,
said her captors had untied her recently and let her watch
French television networks. She said she was very moved
to see that a ticker on the news program was still counting
off her days of captivity – then at 140.
"You're so happy to see that, when you're all crouched
over on the ground," she said. "That's why it
was so important to me to thank absolutely everybody here."
In Baghdad, more than 60 friends and relatives gathered
to hug and kiss Hanoun, throwing a huge feast in his honour.
The two went missing after leaving their Baghdad hotel
on the morning of Jan. 5.
There had been little word of their fate, just a video
of the journalist released in March by the group claiming
to hold the pair. Looking distraught, Aubenas pleaded
for help.
Before Aubenas landed, French Ambassador Bernard Bajolet
described her as "thinner but surprisingly vivacious
and smiling."
"She got through this ordeal with exceptional courage,"
he said.
About 150 foreigners have been kidnapped in Iraq, but
many more Iraqis have been held captive. |
DAKAR (Reuters) -
One thousand military experts
from the United States are training soldiers from nine
West African countries as U.S. fears grow that an Algerian
militant group allied to al Qaeda is broadening its
base in the region.
The exercise, meant to help stem weapons smuggling
and stop militants finding havens around the Sahara
desert, began this week in Mali, Niger, Chad, Algeria
and Mauritania, where an Islamic fundamentalist group
killed 15 soldiers last week.
A posting on an Islamist Web site said Algeria's Salafist
Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC) carried out the
dawn raid on a remote Mauritanian military post, the
first time the GSPC has claimed responsibility for an
attack outside its homeland.
The attack near Mauritania's border with Mali and Algeria
surprised some U.S. military observers who believed
the GSPC had been largely contained and raised fears
the group was increasingly ready to strike out into
new territory.
"Now they've added Mauritania to their list, so
this is another notch on the belt. They're broadening
their base... they've got more bona fide as a trans-national
organization," said a U.S. military official who
closely follows the region.
"We've stood up and said we're going to fix the
problem and they've stood up and said we are the problem.
So it's going to be an interesting race to see who comes
out on top."
The U.S. European Command (EUCOM) is running the joint
military training, known as Operation Flintlock and
planned before the Mauritania attack. It aims to help
countries plan and execute their own counter-terrorism
strategies as well as peacekeeping, humanitarian and
disaster relief operations.
Around 3,000 African soldiers will be schooled in basics
such as marksmanship, small-unit tactics and land navigation
as well as airborne operations and human rights law.
OIL AND COUNTER-TERRORISM
The Sahara is infamous for banditry but the world's
top energy consumer also fears Islamic extremists, civil
war, political anarchy and piracy near the Gulf of Guinea,
which it hopes will supply a
quarter of its oil imports within a decade.
As part of Flintlock, Senegal will host an exercise
with soldiers from nine countries, including Nigeria,
Morocco and Tunisia, in which they will jointly solve
a terrorism scenario.
"In the past the focus has been within their own
borders. Now the focus is much more regional,"
EUCOM's Major Holly Silkman said on Friday.
Flintlock aims to build on training by U.S. Marines
and Special Forces last year in the deserts of Niger,
Chad, Mali and Mauritania, part of a Trans-Sahara Counter
Terrorist Initiative (TSCTI) expected to cost the United
States $100 million over five years.
Some U.S. officials privately acknowledge the main
concern is protecting Nigeria, the continent's biggest
oil producer, the region's only OPEC member and the
main destination for U.S. investment in sub-Saharan
Africa after South Africa.
But critics say Washington's increasingly
high-profile involvement in security in West Africa
risks fueling a growing resentment of U.S. foreign policy
and radicalizing some in a region largely known for
moderate forms of Islam. Think-tank International Crisis
Group has cautioned that a military policy which offers
no alternative livelihoods to already marginalized nomadic
populations in countries around the Sahara risks exacerbating
the threat Washington wants to curb. |
According to Ephraim
Halevy, former chief of Israel's Mossad intelligence
service and current national security adviser to Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, plans have been made for
a substantial U.S. military presence in the Middle East
lasting decades.
"The U.S. campaign in Iraq
was perceived [in the Middle East and Washington] as
a signal of long-term American commitment to do whatever
is required and to 'stay in the neighborhood' for as
long as needed," commented Halevy in a lengthy
op-ed column carried by the April 24 issue of Ha'aretz.
High-ranking U.S. policymakers have "raised the
idea of establishing an American trusteeship regime
in the areas of the Palestinian Authority, if it should
turn out that the Palestinians are not ripe for self-rule.
That arrangement would require an American operational
military presence along Israel's border with the Palestinian
territories."
"Speaking in a semi-closed forum during a visit
to Israel a few months ago," continued Halevy,
"Bill Kristol, one of the
most influential 'neocons' [neoconservatives] in the
United States, noted in this connection that the American
presence in Europe after World War II lasted for nearly
60 years. Israelis who
are trying to promote a role for NATO in the region,
in one form or another, are actually promoting a generation-long
American presence."
U.S. entanglement in the Middle
East in the name of "democracy" has further
destabilized the region and made violent fundamentalist
revolution more likely, especially in Saudi Arabia.
"In [an early April] visit to the United States,"
comments Halevy, "I was told by several well-informed
observers that should one of
the more severe scenarios come to pass, the United
States will have no choice but to deepen its presence
in the Middle East. To that end,
it will have to renew the draft, to ensure that there
are enough forces to deal with developing situations
in countries like Saudi Arabia."
|
RAMIT PLUSHNICK-MASTIJERUSALEM
(AP) - Jewish extremists could open fire on troops during
this summer's withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, or even
carry out a suicide attack to kill the prime minister,
the outgoing chief of the Shin Bet security service
warned in interviews published Friday.
Avi Dichter, who last month ended a five-year term
as head of the Shin Bet, said Jewish extremists who
have no qualms about firing on Israeli soldiers and
police are currently holed up in a Gaza Strip hotel,
which he predicted would be the final stronghold of
resistance to the evacuation.
"Suicide attacks are not limited to the Palestinians.
There can be Jewish suicide attackers. Their first target
is the prime minister," Dichter told the Yediot
Ahronot newspaper.
"We have no experience dealing with such extremists,"
said Dichter, who wielded great power in Israel during
his tenure. He told the newspapers he was seriously
considering entering politics.
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to withdraw from
Gaza and four West Bank settlements is set to begin
in August.
An opinion poll published in Yediot Friday showed
Israeli support for the Gaza withdrawal has dropped
to 53 per cent from a high of 69 per cent in February.
Opposition to the plan has risen from 27 per cent to
38 per cent, according to the poll. The survey, taken
Thursday, questioned 501 people and had a margin of
error of 4.4 per cent. [...]
Even if there is no Israeli-Palestinian violence during
the pullout, Dichter forecasted massive looting in the
settlements if Israel doesn't either sell the homes
to the Palestinians or destroy them.
The army recently said the homes should be left intact
despite a Cabinet decision to demolish them, but Dichter
said he disagrees with the military's position.
"If it's a matter of Jewish property at the time
of the exit, it has to be razed to the foundations.
Otherwise, there will be a festival of looting .†.†.
masses will swarm in to take the roof tiles and the
faucets from the Jews," Dichter told the Haaretz
daily.
"The Palestinian policeman who will stop them
has yet to be born, and the idea of putting in an international
force is simply a joke" because it wouldn't be
able to "stop the wave," Dichter said. |
PAUL GARWOODBAGHDAD (AP) - Iraqi
police Sunday found the bullet-riddled bodies of 28
people - many thought to be Sunni Arabs - buried in
shallow graves or dumped streetside in Baghdad. Also
on Sunday, the U.S. military announced the killing of
four more soldiers Sunday, pushing the American death
toll past 1,700.
The bodies were discovered as the Shiite-led government
pressed to open disarmament talks with insurgents responsible
for a relentless campaign of violence, which has taken
on ominous sectarian overtones with recurring tit-for-tat
killings.
A crackdown by Iraqi security forces in Baghdad and
offensives carried out by U.S. forces in western Iraq
have had only had a temporary effect in blunting the
cycle of carnage in which at least 940 people have died
since Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari announced his
government six weeks ago. [...]
Lieut. Ayad Othman said a shepherd found the bodies
of 20 men on Friday in the Nahrawan desert, 30 kilometres
east of Baghdad.
"All were blindfolded and their
hands were tied behind their backs and shot from behind,"
Othman said. "The assassins excavated a hole and
buried them inside it and seven were found naked."
Witnesses claimed the slain men were Sunnis, according
to a statement from the influential Sunni organization,
the Association of Muslim Scholars. No details were
provided to support the claim, but the association said
it had begun an investigation.
Eight other slain men were found shot in the head
Sunday in two different locations in Baghdad's predominatly
Shiite northern suburb of Shula, police Capt. Majed
Abdul Aziz said. The bodies could not immediately be
identified.
"The interior minister
keeps saying security is getting better, but everyday
we hear of 20 bodies killed here and other 20 bodies
found there," said Salih al-Mutlak, head
of the prominent umbrella Sunni body, the National Dialogue
Council.
The grisly discoveries were announced two days after
21 men were found slain Friday near Qaim, on the lawless
Syrian frontier about 320 kilometres west of Baghdad.
[...] |
TEHRAN, June 12 (Xinhuanet) --
Five bomb explosions took place in Iran on Sunday, killing
ten people and injuring nearly 40, five days ahead of
the presidential elections.
The latest explosion occurred at the Shohada-Safa
juncture near the Imam Hussein Square in central Tehran
at about 20:20 local time (1550 GMT) when a small bomb
went off, killing at least two people and wounding four
others, state media said.
The official IRNA news agency quoted residents as
saying that shortly after the blast police and fire
fighters arrived at the scene and there might be another
bomb set nearby.
"Police are trying to defuse a bomb," a
witness said.
Tehran's explosion came just several hours after four
bombs blew up in the southwestern Iranian city of Ahvaz,
killing eight people and injuring scores.
The explosions in Ahvaz, capital of the oil-rich Khuzestan
province bordering Iraq, took place near four crowded
locations separately, including the governor's office,
a civilian residence center, a public service agglomerate
with some financial institutions and a governmental
organizations' center, a source told Xinhua by phone.
Rescue workers are moving body of a victim in the explosion
into the ambulance.
It has not been proven yet that the Tehran explosion
is related to those in Ahvaz.
The serial explosions happened just five days ahead
of Iran's ninth presidential elections.
Gholam Reza Shariati, deputy governor of Khuzestan,
told state television after the four explosions in Ahvaz
that the explosions were aimed to damage the country's
integrity and undermine the elections.
"We cannot say for now who were behind the attacks,
and it is still under investigation, but certainly they
cannot reach their aim of spoiling the elections,"
Shariati said. |
NEW YORK - North Korea and Iran
are reportedly in secret talks to build underground
bunkers to hide Iranian clandestine nuclear weapons
project.
Britain's Sunday Telegraph quoted Japan's Kyodo news
agency as saying that Pyongyang and Tehran are discussing
whether the North Koreans will build the bunkers for
the Iranians or act as advisers to Iranian construction
companies. Construction experts had arrived in Tehran
to survey Iranian requirements, the report said.
The experts include a senior North Korean specialist
in underground construction who helped to design the
bunkers that contain Pyongyang's nuclear weapons programmes.
Iran has tried to build its own underground facilities
but these were quickly discovered by International Atomic
Energy Agency inspectors.
Now, Tehran wants help to build a large new network
of tunnels and caves at a secret location in central
Iran. |
CARACAS, June 12 (Xinhuanet) --
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez on Sunday blamed his
US counterpart George W. Bush for the crisis in Bolivia,
saying Bush's "poisoned medicine" of free-market
democracy has been rejected by Latin America.
Chavez said the protests in the Andean nation were
sparked by popular opposition to capitalist free-trade
policies advocated by Bush.
He condemned as "poisoned medicine" Bush's
speech to the Organization of American States last week,
in which he recommended a mix of representative democracy,
integration of world markets and individual freedoms.
"That is what is killing the peoples of Latin
America ... This is the path of destabilization, of
violence, of war between brothers," Chavez said
in a "Hello President" weekly television and
radio program.
Calling Bush "Mr. Danger,"
Chavez added, "We, the people of Latin America
are saying 'No Sir, Mr. Danger,' your poisoned medicine
has failed."
Also in the broadcast, Chavez said Venezuela will
take the United States to an international court if
it does not extradite an exile with Cuban origin wanted
by Caracas for the 1976 bombing of a Cuban airliner.
Chavez said the US authorities had no excuse not to
grant the extradition of Luis Posada Carriles, who was
indicted in Venezuelain the 1970s for involvement in
the 1976 terrorist attack on a Cubana de Aviacion airliner
which killed 73.
Posada, with Venezuelan citizenship, escaped from
prison in 1985. He was arrested in Miami, southern US,
in mid May, for having entered the US territory illegally. |
MOSCOW, - Many Russians view the
eastward advance of NATO and "color" revolutions
in former Soviet countries of the CIS as interconnected
events. Is there a conspiracy against Russia?
Writer Alexander Prokhanov and Alexander Yakovlev,
head of the Democracy foundation, shared their opinions
on this score in a weekly, Argumenty i Fakty, in the
run-up to Russia Day on June 12.
The West's geostrategic objective
is to weaken Russia, to prevent it from becoming a superpower
again, and to turn it into a compliant donor. This is
why Russia is being surrounded by security cordons and
"hostile regimes" are being established around
it. "So, there are all the elements of a conspiracy,"
Prokhanov said.
According to him, the attack against Russia includes
the introduction of foreign standards and values in
Russian society. "Hollywood is as important as
the CIA in this attack, and the eastward advance of
NATO is as important as young Russian men wearing T-shirts
with the American flag," the writer said. "And
the consequences of this attack are unpredictable."
Yakovlev said there was certainly a conspiracy against
Russia, but it involved Russian bureaucrats who were
"greedy, corrupt and despised their own people."
He said the goal of this collusion was personal power
and enrichment.
"In the past, we blamed everything on the Jews,
[but] now it is the turn of Americans," said Yakovlev,
a "hero" of Mikhail Gorbachev's perestroika.
"If you watch Russian television regularly, you
get the impression that the U.S. has nothing to do other
than plot against Russia."
Yakovlev was shocked by the
results of a poll according to which 80% of Russians
view America as the country's main enemy. "Russia
and the Soviet Union never fought the U.S. Not a single
Russian soldier was killed by an American and vice versa,"
he said. "And now this shocking result. But if
you ask anyone what the U.S. did to him or her personally,
they will have no answer."
On the whole, if there is a conspiracy against Russia,
"the main conspirators are we ourselves,"
Yakovlev said. |
A Russian passenger train travelling
from the Chechen capital to Moscow has been derailed
by an explosion, according to the Interfax news agency.
Emergencies Ministry spokesman Viktor Beltsov said
two carriages went off the track about 150km from Moscow,
causing injury to about 10 passengers - two of whom
needed hospital treatment.
"The train driver said that the explosion took
place in front of the engine," Beltsov said, adding
that the bomb had left a one-metre deep crater.
Earlier reports had said some passengers heard a loud
bang before the derailment. [...] |
MADRID, June 10 (Xinhuanet) --
Two grenades exploded near Spain's Zaragoza airport
on Friday after warning call in name of ETA, Spanish
media reported. |
McMINNVILLE, Ore.
(BP)--What is the difference between a prostitute and
a porn star? A porn star, it seems, can attend a fundraising
dinner hosted by the National Republican Congressional
Committee. The word is still out on the prostitute.
If all goes as planned, "adult film actress"
(can you say oxymoron?) Mary Carey will accompany her
boss, hardcore pornographer Mark Kulkis, at the 2005
President's Dinner and Salute to Freedom June 14.
While the purpose of the event is to raise money for
the NRCC which, according to its website, exists to
support the election of Republicans, one of the main
reasons guests are forking over $2,500 a plate is to
dine with President Bush.
In the case of Carey and Kulkis, the pair hopes their
$5,000 will also translate into positive public relations.
Carey describes herself as an aspiring politician.
She was one of 135 candidates who ran for governor of
California in the 2003 recall election. Her platform
included taxing breast enhancements, making lap dances
tax deductible, using porn stars as "goodwill ambassadors"
and installing web cameras throughout the governor's
mansion.
Prior to the dinner, Carey plans to officially announce
her candidacy for Lieutenant Governor of California.
"Since Arnold [Schwarzenegger] is a Republican,
I thought this dinner would be a great networking opportunity
for me."
Carey indicated she was looking forward to meeting
Karl Rove because, "Smart men like him are so sexy."
She also added she hopes to persuade Rove to support
"gay marriage."
Kulkis, president of Kick (expletive) Pictures, sees
the invitation as a way of gaining credibility for the
porn industry.
"Republicans bill themselves as the pro-business
party," Kulkis said, according to WorldNetDaily.
"Well you won't find a group of people more pro-business
than pornographers." He added, "We contributed
over $10 billion to the national economy last year."
Kulkis also sees the dinner as an opportunity to challenge
the stereotypes of porn workers. "We're not the
freakish demons people make us out to be," Kulkis
said. "I'm not a creep with a coke spoon around
his neck. I'm a regular guy."
Regular guy? Yes, of course, how silly of me to not
realize that all regular guys shamelessly exploit women
for profit.
What is going on with the Bush administration? Earlier
this year it was the First Lady cracking risque jokes
at the White House correspondents' dinner. Now
purveyors of degrading hardcore porn will be dining
with the party that champions family values.
What's next, mud wrestling on the White House lawn?
It is worth noting that Carey is known for more than
just her "acting." She also makes appearances
at "gentlemen clubs."
In April, Carey (real name: Mary Ellen Cook) was one
of five people arrested at a strip club in a suburb
of Tacoma, Wash. The Associated Press reported that
all were accused of violating an adult cabaret ordinance,
which included "getting too close to patrons and
others" as well as "touching themselves in
a sexual manner."
When asked about the presence of the porn peddlers,
NRCC spokesperson Carl Forti downplayed the situation.
"There are going to be about 6,000 in the ballroom,"
he told WorldNetDaily. "It's not like it's some
kind of one-on-one dinner."
Forti added, "They've paid their money. No matter
what they do, the money is going to help elect Republicans
to the House."
Thank you, Mr. Forti, for clearing things up for folks,
like myself, that voted for the president this past
November. If I understand the
explanation correctly, economics trumps ethics.
To put it another way, money talks -- even money gained
by prostituting the glorious gift of sex -- and everything
else walks.
"Lighten up," you might say. "After
all Jesus spent time among prostitutes." Yes, He
did. However, His purpose was to bring positive change
to their lives and empower them to walk away from a
degrading occupation. And, I might add, He did not charge
them $2,500 for the privilege of dining with Him.
The Bush administration should urge the NRCC to return
the pornographers' money and rescind the invitations.
It would send the message that while the porn industry
might be legal, it is not credible or ethical.
If the porn star shows up at the President's dinner,
I think we will have the answer concerning the presence
of prostitutes.
|
McCOMB, Miss. - Authorities say
a disagreement over a frozen snack led a McComb teenager
to fatally shoot his father and threaten his mother.
Curtis McCray Jr., 16, was arrested and charged with
murder last week after allegedly shooting Curtis McCray
Sr. with a shotgun from about 20 feet away, the Pike
County Sheriff's Department said.
Investigator David Haywood said the shooting occurred
after the teen was punished for being involved in a
minor wreck, and the boy became enraged when his parents
returned home eating Sno-Balls and there wasn't one
for him.
The teen then allegedly threatened his mother, Gloria,
with the gun before speeding away in the family's car
and leading authorities on a one-hour high-speed chase
through three counties, Haygood said. [...] |
An earthquake measuring
4.2 on the Richter Scale occurred five kilometers from
Matata and was felt throughout the Bay Of Plenty.
The Earthquake was shallow with a focal depth of 8
kilometers beneath the earth's surface.
|
Residents are shaken,
but there are no reports of serious injuries or damage.
A moderate earthquake with an epicenter about 20 miles
south of Palm Springs jolted residents from north of
the Mojave Desert to south of the Mexican border Sunday
morning, but officials said there were no reports of
serious injuries or damage.
"We're a two gas station town … and neither
one fell down," said Kalev Kulbin, a firefighter
with the Riverside County Fire Department's station
in Anza, a rural community about six miles northwest
of the quake's epicenter in a remote area of dry rolling
hills.
The magnitude 5.6 earthquake shook a normally quiet
section of the San Jacinto fault zone, Southern California's
most active, which runs from near San Bernardino to
the southeast near the Salton Sea, said Anthony Guarino,
a seismic analyst at Caltech. That placed it within
a few miles of a 5.1 magnitude quake that struck on
Oct. 30, 2001, and not far from the 6.6 magnitude Superstition
Hills quake of 1987, Guarino said.
|
In the United States, cattle producers
fear their beef could be shunned again by other countries.
US Agriculture Department (USDA) testing
of three suspect cows has returned a positive result
for mad cow disease for one of them, as Matt
Kaye reports.
"USDA says the possible second US case of mad
cow disease was in an older Texas cow that couldn't
walk, but they don't know if it was imported, as was
a cow of Canadian origin in Washington state confirmed
positive for mad cow disease in 2003.
"Brain samples from the latest animal will be
sent to the world's top mad cow lab in Weybridge, England,
for final testing.
"USDA secretary Mike Johanns told reporters:
"I feel very strongly that this information should
not impact our discussions with Japan, Korea or Canada."
Mr Johanns argues US beef is safe, though the greatest
fear is another global shutdown of markets to the US,
as in 2003. [...] |
Three new cases of the bird flu
have been reported in Vietnam. The number of cases since
December has now risen to 52. Eighteen of the patients
have died from the disease.
One of the infected was described as a 30-year-old
man while the other two were women whose age was not
disclosed.
Trinh Quan Huan, head of the Health Ministry's Preventive
Medicine Department, told Reuters, 'All the three have
been infected in relation to sick poultry. Their condition
is not serious and by now the 30-year-old man has been
discharged.'
The two sick women were still being treated in a Hanoi
hospital. [...] |
BEIJING, Sunday, June 12 (AP) -
A torrential flood hit a school in northeast China and
swept 91 people - most of them children - to their deaths,
while a fire in the south raced through the top floors
of a hotel and killed 31 people, the state media reported
Sunday.
The authorities in Beijing were struggling to handle
the disasters thousands of miles apart, trying to overcome
faulty communication in the flood zone and vowing to
send an emergency team of investigators to the hotel
fire.
Friday's flood inundated a school in Shalan, in China's
northeastern province of Heilongjiang. Eighty-seven
of the victims were students and the rest were villagers,
the official New China News Agency said. Some 352 students
- all between 6 and 14 years old - and 31 teachers were
in the school, the agency said.
In China's far south, a fire engulfed the top three
floors of a hotel, killing 31 people, the state media
said. The fire broke out at noon on Friday at the Huanan
Hotel in Shantou, a city in Guangdong Province about
180 miles northeast of Hong Kong. It swept through the
top stories of the four-story building, the reports
said. |
A flood that swept through a primary
school in China's north-west may have killed as many
as 200 people.
Local resident Liu Zixia, whose own daughter drowned
in the flood, says there are
90 refrigerators at the local funeral home and most
of them contain the bodies of two children.
The official death toll is 92, including 88 children,
with 17 people missing.
The Shanghai Morning Post says villagers staged sit-ins
over the weekend and blocked major roads to protest
at the inefficiency of the rescue operation.
It says many villagers had already found their children's
bodies by the time the rescue teams arrived. |
BOGOTA, June 11 (Xinhuanet) --
At least 35 people have died in floods and mudslides
caused by winter weather in Colombia since April, the
local press reported Saturday.
The six latest deaths occurred in the coffee-producing
Axis region in the city of Manizales, and in Villa Maria,
which were hit by mudslides, official sources said.
The most serious case occurred in Manizalez, capital
of Caldas Department, where a mudslide buried two houses,
with four persons, including two children, inside.
In the rural area of Villa Maria, two people died
after a mudslide toppled two houses while 30 others
were evacuated.
In Manizales, two houses collapsed and 50 more were
evacuated because of a possible explosion of a vehicle
that carried gas tanks.
Weather experts forecast that the rain season in the
Andean country will last until late June. |
A dramatic rise in river levels
is threatening an endangered species of bird that nests
on the shores of Lake Diefenbaker in Saskatchewan.
There are an estimated 115 piping plover nests buried
in the sand at the Saskatoon-area lake, but more than
half of them could be wiped out by rising water levels
in the days ahead, said Glen McMaster of the Saskatchewan
Watershed Authority.Piping plovers scoot along the sand.
"This water is going to be rising so quickly
that many of these nests will be flooded," said
McMaster, an ecologist with the watershed authority's
habitat protection branch.
The problem stems from the recent torrential rainfalls
in Alberta, which are pushing water along the South
Saskatchewan River into the lake.
Earlier this week, forecasters predicted that lake
levels could rise as much as three metres by the end
of June. [...] |
Leading environmentalist Professor
Tim Flannery has warned that Australia is now entering
long-term climate change, which could cause longer and
more frequent droughts.
He also predicts that the ongoing drought could leave
Sydney's dams dry in just two years.
Professor Flannery, who is the director of the South
Australian Museum, has told ABC TV's Lateline that global
warming is threatening Australia's chance of returning
to a regular rainfall pattern.
"Three major phenomena are depriving Australia
of its rainfall," he said.
"One of them is just simply the shifting weather
patterns as the planet warms up, so the tropics are
expanding southwards and the winter rainfall zone is
sort of dropping off the southern edge of the continent."
He says the second phenomena is disturbances in the
ozone layer.
"That is causing wind speeds around Antarctica
to increase and, again, drawing that winter rainfall
to the south," he said.
The third phenomena, which Professor Flannery says
is the most worrying, is the recurring El Nino weather
pattern.
"That's occurring as the Pacific Ocean warms
up, and we're seeing much longer El Ninos than we've
seen before and often now back-to-back el Ninos with
very little of the La Nina cycle, the flood cycle, in
between," he said.
Professor Flannery says that all adds up to back-to-back
droughts, and if he had a say he would ration water
use.
"If you think there's only a 10 per cent chance
that this rainfall deficit's going to continue for another
few years, you'd be pulling out all stops to preserve
water," he said.
"Because every litre you use now on your car,
or your garden or whatever else, you might want to drink
in a year's time." [...] |
BHUBANESWAR, India - The death
toll due to the heatwave sweeping most of central and
southern India climbed to at least 65 on Sunday with
30 new deaths reported from eastern Orissa state, officials
said.
At least 54 people have died in Orissa where vast
swathes of the rural landscape have seen temperatures
soaring to 49 degrees Celsius (120.2 degrees Fahrenheit)
The worst affected districts were Titlagarh and Talcher
with the elderly and children making up most of the
dead, said a state government official who requested
anonymity.
He said authorities were investigating whether more
people may have died as unofficial reports have put
the death toll at over 100 in the state.
Forecasters say the heat wave is likely to last another
two days.
The other heat-related deaths were reported in western
Maharashtra and southern Andhra Pradesh states where
more than 1,400 people died due to severe heat conditions
in 2003.
India's seasonal monsoon rains hit the southernmost
state of Kerala last week but it would take another
fortnight for them to reach the sun-scorched central
and northern states, according to weather forecasters.
|
As people in Ontario and Quebec
suffer through the first heat wave of the season, Environment
Canada is projecting abnormally high temperatures this
summer across the country.
"The dice are loaded to give you a warmer summer,
so get used to it," said David Phillips, a spokesman
for the agency.The darker the colour on this map, the
more likely an area is to see above-average temperatures
this summer, according to Environment Canada.
"We're going to see a lot of this, this summer."
It's been more than five days since Southern Ontario
and parts of Quebec first faced temperatures that approached
or topped 30 C – which felt like 41 because of
the humidity.
That's about 10 degrees hotter than normal.
Environment Canada said that on Sunday, temperatures
reached 30 C in Toronto, 31 C in Ottawa and 32 C in
Montreal. [...] |
The construction of
the temples of Nickern, on the site that is now Dresden,
puts the first civilisations of Europe at the forefront
of early human endeavour to master nature.
Some two millennia before the first stones were laid
for the pyramids of Egypt, humanity's preoccupation, from
the forests of Germany to the plains of Pakistan, was
both literally and figuratively to place roots
in the soil.
Archaeological evidence suggests that
by the fifth millennium BC, tribes in regions such as
Baluchistan, on the site known as Mehrgarh, in the north-
western corner of the Indian sub-continent, and the Samarrans
in Mesopotamia were establishing farms and permanent communities.
In Egypt, crops such as flax, cotton and barley were
being grown from about 5000BC in villages where herds
of sheep and goats were also kept. The discovery of early
traces of agriculture in New Guinea from about the same
time indicate that across the globe humans were starting
to sculpt their landscape.
Dr John Robertson, a Washington University-based anthropologist,
said: "There is much of this period that we still
don't understand, but humanity was beyond the stage of
hunting down prey and smearing itself with the entrails."
[...]
Archaeologists have struggled
to pinpoint and outline the development of the first farming
communities, because the evidence that they left behind
is scanty at best. But the picture that is often
drawn of the European context is that an increasingly
sophisticated farming culture, with its base in Mesopotamia,
roughly the area occupied by present-day Iraq and Syria,
was radiating outwards across the Middle East towards
the outer reaches of Europe.
On the Orkney islands, complex stone structures such
as the Knap of Howar, the earliest standing dwellings
to be found in north-west Europe, date from about 3500BC.
Stone, however, is durable and tends to stay in place.
By contrast, it has been difficult for archaeologists
to establish the degree of sophistication of the civilisation
that built the Nickern temples more than a millennium
before the Orkney structures using timber and earth.[...]
In Nickern, the people who were building their own grand
places of worship manufactured ceramic statues of humans
and animals as did the inhabitants of Mehrgarh in
Baluchistan although there is as yet little evidence
of the beliefs that drove this practice. |
Archaeologists
have discovered Europe's oldest civilisation, a network
of dozens of temples, 2,000 years older than Stonehenge
and the Pyramids.
More than 150 gigantic monuments have been located beneath
the fields and cities of modern-day Germany, Austria and
Slovakia. They were built 7,000 years ago, between 4800BC
and 4600BC. Their discovery, revealed
today by The Independent, will revolutionise
the study of prehistoric Europe, where an appetite for
monumental architecture was thought to have developed
later than in Mesopotamia and Egypt.
In all, more than 150 temples have been identified. Constructed
of earth and wood, they had ramparts and palisades that
stretched for up to half a mile. They were built by a
religious people who lived in communal longhouses up to
50 metres long, grouped around substantial villages. Evidence
suggests their economy was based on cattle, sheep, goat
and pig farming.
Their civilisation seems to have died out after about
200 years and the recent archaeological discoveries are
so new that the temple building culture does not even
have a name yet.
Excavations have been taking place over the past few
years - and have triggered a re-evaluation of similar,
though hitherto mostly undated, complexes identified from
aerial photographs throughout central Europe.
Archaeologists are now beginning to
suspect that hundreds of these very early monumental religious
centres, each up to 150 metres across, were constructed
across a 400-mile swath of land in what is now Austria,
the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and eastern Germany.
The most complex excavated so far - located inside the
city of Dresden - consisted of an apparently sacred internal
space surrounded by two palisades, three earthen banks
and four ditches.
The monuments seem to be a phenomenon associated exclusively
with a period of consolidation and growth that followed
the initial establishment of farming cultures in the centre
of the continent.
It is possible that the newly revealed early Neolithic
monument phenomenon was the consequence of an increase
in the size of - and competition between - emerging Neolithic
tribal or pan-tribal groups, arguably Europe's earliest
mini-states.
After a relatively brief period - perhaps just one or
two hundred years - either the need or the socio-political
ability to build them disappeared, and monuments of this
scale were not built again until the Middle Bronze Age,
3,000 years later. Why this monumental
culture collapsed is a mystery.
The archaeological investigation into these vast Stone
Age temples over the past three years has also revealed
several other mysteries. First, each complex was only
used for a few generations - perhaps 100 years maximum.
Second, the central sacred area was nearly always the
same size, about a third of a hectare. Third, each circular
enclosure ditch - irrespective of diameter - involved
the removal of the same volume of earth. In other words,
the builders reduced the depth and/or width of each ditch
in inverse proportion to its diameter, so as to always
keep volume (and thus time spent) constant.
Archaeologists are speculating that this may have been
in order to allow each earthwork to be dug by a set number
of special status workers in a set number of days - perhaps
to satisfy the ritual requirements of some sort of religious
calendar.
The multiple bank, ditch and palisade systems "protecting"
the inner space seem not to have been built for defensive
purposes - and were instead probably designed to prevent
ordinary tribespeople from seeing the sacred and presumably
secret rituals which were performed in the "inner
sanctum" .
The investigation so far suggests that each religious
complex was ritually decommissioned at the end of its
life, with the ditches, each of which had been dug successively,
being deliberately filled in.
"Our excavations have revealed the degree of monumental
vision and sophistication used by these early farming
communities to create Europe's first truly large scale
earthwork complexes," said the senior archaeologist,
Harald Staeuble of the Saxony state government's heritage
department, who has been directing the archaeological
investigations. Scientific investigations into the recently
excavated material are taking place in Dresden.
The people who built the huge
circular temples were the descendants of migrants who
arrived many centuries earlier from the Danube plain in
what is now northern Serbia and Hungary. The temple-builders
were pastoralists, controlling large herds of cattle,
sheep and goats as well as pigs. They made tools of stone,
bone and wood, and small ceramic statues of humans and
animals. They manufactured substantial amounts of geometrically
decorated pottery, and they lived in large longhouses
in substantial villages.
One village complex and temple at Aythra, near Leipzig,
covers an area of 25 hectares. Two hundred longhouses
have been found there. The population would have been
up to 300 people living in a highly organised settlement
of 15 to 20 very large communal buildings. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|