|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
TONY Blair last
night issued a clear threat to Iran and suggested that
military action against the Islamic republic could
no longer be ruled out by the international community.
Departing sharply from Britain's previous cautious
stance, the Prime Minister expressed his fury at
the president of Iran's call for Israel to be "wiped
from the face of the Earth".
The president's comments, following growing unease
over Iran's continued nuclear programme, its defiance
of a UN inspection regime and its alleged interference
in Iraq, have sharply increased international tensions.
Speaking after the European Union leaders' meeting
at Hampton Court outside London yesterday, Mr Blair
declared that Iran would be making "a very big
mistake" if it believed Iraq will distract European
and US leaders.
Admitting that he has previously
come under pressure to rule out military action against
Iran, Mr Blair predicted that in the wake of the Iranian
president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's comments on Israel,
he will now face calls to consider that very option.
"If they carry on like this,
people are going to believe they are a real threat
to world stability," Mr Blair said. "If they
carry on like this, the question people are going to
ask me is, 'When are you going to do something about
this?'"
Describing himself as "very angry" and Mr
Ahmadinejad's comments as "a disgrace," the
Prime Minister said he held very little hope of Iran
changing course without some form of international
intervention. [...] |
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
has caused a political storm by calling for Israel
to be "wiped off the map". The hardline authoritarian
President was speaking in front of 3,000 students at
a conference in Tehran entitled "The World without
Zionism".
The west reacted angrily to Ahmadinejad's statement.
The British Foreign Office described it as "sickening".
The White House said that it "underscores the
concerns we have about Iran's nuclear operations".
Israel's Vice-Prime Minister Shimon Peres called
for Iran's expulsion from the UN, saying that the
remark "contravenes the United Nations charter
and is tantamount to a crime against humanity".
Whilst this reaction might sound like moral outrage,
it can hardly be described as such. The term 'moral
outrage' describes anger provoked by the violation
of some ethical principle. To
allow ourselves to be morally offended by one nation's
president calling for another country to be "wiped
off the map" we must first have ensured that our
own actions do not contravene the same operative ethical
principles. In this respect, every citizen of the UK,
the US and Israel has a very long road to travel.
In 1947, the UN decreed that historic Palestine should
be partitioned, with 56 percent of the land going to
the 600,000 strong Jewish population and the remaining
44 percent going to the 1.2 million strong Arab population.
Earlier, in 1938, the Zionist leader David Ben-Gurion,
later the first Prime Minister of Israel, wrote, "[I
am] satisfied with part of the country, but on the
basis of the assumption that after we build up a strong
force following the establishment of the state -- we
will abolish the partition of the country, and we will
expand to the whole Land of Israel". In the 1947-49
Arab-Israeli war, around 800,000 Palestinians were
ethnically cleansed from their historic homeland by
Israeli forces subjecting them to assasinations, rapes
and massacres. Israel seized about 78 percent of the
British 'Mandate' Palestine by force of arms, with
Egypt and Jordan taking the remainder. The
Palestinian state decreed by the international community
had been forcibly 'wiped off the map', to use Ahmadinejad's
phrase. Successive Israeli governments ensured that
it was never to emerge.
Does calling for the elimination of a state constitute "a
crime against humanity", as Shimon Peres contends?
If so, then Ahmadinejad would be joined in the dock
by every Israeli official who has not only advocated
but effected the policy of expansionism that continues
to prevent a Palestinian nation state from emerging.
The list would be long and illustrious. [...]
Since 1967 Israel has held further occupied territory
in open defiance of international law. It has built
vast settlements on that land and repressed the occupied
population with a ferocity that has been savage in
the extreme (more of which in a moment). In spite of
this Shimon Peres has, with considerable self-restraint,
never described Israel's actions as crimes against
humanity, or conceded its right to be a part of the
United Nations, whose laws it treats with utter contempt.
The outrage displayed by western
politicians at Ahmadinejad's denial of Israel's right
to exist was nowhere to be seen when Dov Weisglass,
one of the principal advisers to Israeli premier
Ariel Sharon, set out his government's strategy to
prevent the creation of a Palestinian state in an
interview last year. [...]
In the interview, Weisglass left very little to the
imagination: "[...] Effectively, this whole package
that is called the Palestinian state, with all that
it entails, has been removed from our agenda indefinitely".
Did the stated intention of keeping Palestine off
the map "indefinitely"
cause the White House any of the "concern" it
expressed this week at the remarks of the Iranian President?
Hardly. Weisglass boasted that he had achieved "all
this with authority and permission. All with a presidential
blessing and the ratification of both houses of Congress." [...]
Despite Israel's continued expansionism, open dismissal
of Palestinian self- determination, brutal treatment
of civilians in the occupied territories and total
rejection of international law, the Blair government's
self-declared "admiration" for Sharon's "courage" extends
far beyond mere warm words. The historian Mark Curtis,
formerly of Chatham House and a specialist in British
foreign policy, notes that "[UK] arms exports
[to Israel] doubled from 2000 to 2001, reaching £22.5
million as Israel stepped up aggression in the occupied
territories. Supplies included small arms, grenade-making
kits and components for equipment such as armoured
fighting vehicles, tanks and combat aircraft. [The
UK] has recently supplied Israel with machine guns,
rifles, ammunition, components for tanks and helicopters,
leg irons, electric shock belts, tear gas and categories
covering mortars, rocket launchers, anti-tank weapons
and military explosives".
The contribution of Britain's principal ally, the
United States, hardly requires any review. By one estimate,
US support for Israel between 1973 and 2002, military
and otherwise, totalled $1.6 trillion, over $5,700
per head of population, more than twice the cost of
the Vietnam War.
Moral outrage on the part of Britain and the US was
conspicuously absent, as the weapons they had sold
to Israel were put into murderous effect during the
early years of the second intifada. US historian Norman
G. Finkelstein describes the conduct of our Israeli
ally: "To repress Palestinian
resistance, a senior Israeli officer in early 2002
urged the army to "analyze and internalize the
lessons of…how the German army fought in the
Warsaw ghetto." Judging by Israeli carnage
in the West Bank culminating in Operation Defensive
Shield - the targeting of Palestinian ambulances and
medical personnel, the targeting of journalists, the
killing of Palestinian children "for sport" (Chris
Hedges, New York Times former Cairo bureau chief),
the rounding up, handcuffing and blindfolding of all
Palestinian males between the ages of 15 and 50, and
affixing of numbers on their wrists, the indiscriminate
torture of Palestinian detainees, the denial of food,
water, electricity, and medical assistance to the Palestinian
civilian population, the indiscriminate air assaults
on Palestinian neighborhoods, the use of Palestinian
civilians as human shields, the bulldozing of Palestinian
homes with the occupants huddled inside - it appears
that the Israeli army followed the officer's advice.
When the operation, supported by fully 90 percent of
Israelis, was finally over, 500 Palestinians were dead
and 1500 wounded."
Finkelstein quotes a Human Rights Watch report on
the Israeli assault on the Jenin refugee camp in April
2002. According to the report, a "thirty-seven-
year-old paralyzed man was killed when the IDF [Israel
Defense Forces] bulldozed his home on top of him, refusing
to allow his relatives the time to remove him from
the home"; a "fifty-seven-year-old wheelchair-bound
man…was shot and run over by a tank on a major
road outside the camp…even though he had a white
flag attached to his wheelchair"; "IDF soldiers
forced a sixty-five-year-old woman to stand on a rooftop
in front of an IDF position in the middle of a helicopter
battle."
An Israeli soldier who operated a
bulldozer in the assault on Jenin breathlessly described
the experience: "I wanted to destroy everything.
I begged the officers…to let me knock it all
down, from top to bottom. To level everything….
For three days, I just destroyed and destroyed….
I found joy with every house that came down, because
I knew that they didn't mind dying, but they cared
for their homes. If you knocked down a house, you buried
40 or 50 people for generations. If I am sorry for
anything, it is for not tearing the whole camp down.…I
had plenty of satisfaction. I really enjoyed it."
As pressure builds on Iran over its nuclear weapons
programme, the remarks made by President Ahmadinejad
will be seized upon as evidence of Iran's pathological
depravity, and justification for the increasingly menacing
stance the US and the UK are taking towards it. Tony
Blair expressed his "revulsion" at the Iranian
President's statement. Saying
that he had never heard of the president of a country
saying they wanted to wipe out another country, Blair
added: "Can you imagine a state like that with
an attitude like that having a nuclear weapon?".
The Prime Minister is of course
well aware that he has no need to use his imagination.
His government arms and otherwise backs just such
a country: Israel. [...] |
A British member of Parliament
suggested trade sanctions against Israel, which
she blamed for Arab violence that is their "only
outlet" because of military checkpoints and "the
so-called security wall." |
MOSCOW - Russia is ready to continue
its political dialogue with Iran and expand cooperation
in all areas, Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov said at
a Wednesday meeting with Iranian First Vice President
Parviz Dadwoodi in Moscow.
"We are convinced that under the new Iranian
leadership, we will maintain and advance our friendly
relations," he said.
"Relations with Iran rely on a solid legal groundwork
and have developed into a multifaceted partnership," he
said. [...] |
MOSCOW - Russia, Syria's close
ally since Cold War times, will do all it takes to
block any attempt to slap economic sanctions against
Damascus, a Foreign Ministry spokesman was quoted as
saying on Wednesday.
The United States and France threatened Syria with
economic sanctions earlier this week if Damascus
did not cooperate fully with a U.N. probe into the
assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik
Hariri. [...] |
On the eve of the day that is
expected to bring indictments against current and former
members of the Bush White House, there are rumors circulating
in the media and around the punditocracy of DC about
what will occur tomorrow.
I spoke to a well known TV journalist yesterday
outside the US Court House in DC and we agreed that
this prosecutor's prevention of leaks from his legal
team was unprecedented in a city that thrives on
leaks. The rumors are mainly emanating from the defense
side of the house. But here's the latest from the
rumor mill (all very speculative but all from "insiders"):
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald will seek a
Leakgate Grand Jury extension and possibly another
separate Grand Jury to look into criminal matters not
directly associated with the CIA leak...
Karl Rove may not be indicted tomorrow but will remain
under investigation by an extended Grand Jury...
Others report that Rove may still be trying to negotiate
a deal with the prosecutor in return for his cooperation...
Judith Miller of the New York Times remains under
investigation for inconsistent statements before the
Grand Jury...
I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby is facing "problems" on
the domestic home front as well as from the Special
Prosecutor...
The names of John Bolton, David Wurmser, and CIA officer
Frederick Fleitz have been added to the list of potential
targets of the prosecutor for engaging in a criminal
conspiracy to divulge the covert identity of Valerie
Plame to Libby and other White House officials . .
.
The Bush White House is gripped in panic with an increasingly
volatile George W. Bush, using the saltiest of language,
accusing his closest aides of betrayal and disloyalty
. . .
Younger White House staffers are appalled at how fast
the White House, which operated on strict organizational
discipline, is unraveling in the midst of the biggest
scandal to hit Washington since Watergate. Stay tuned. |
Vice President Cheney and his
chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby,
overruling advice from some White House political staffers
and lawyers, decided to withhold crucial documents
from the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2004 when
the panel was investigating the use of pre-war intelligence
that erroneously concluded Saddam Hussein had weapons
of mass destruction, according to Bush administration
and congressional sources. [...]
The new information that Cheney and Libby blocked
information to the Senate Intelligence Committee
further underscores the central role played by the
vice president's office in trying to blunt criticism
that the Bush administration exaggerated intelligence
data to make the case to go to war. [...]
In recent weeks Fitzgerald's investigation has zeroed
in on the activities of Libby, who is Cheney's top
national security and foreign policy advisor, as well
as the conflict between the vice president's office
on one side and the CIA and State Department on the
other over the use of intelligence on Iraq. The New
York Times reported this week, for example, that Libby
first learned about Plame and her covert CIA status
from Cheney in a conversation with the vice president
weeks before Plame's cover was blown in a July 2003
newspaper column by Robert Novak.
The Intelligence Committee at the time was trying
to determine whether the CIA and other intelligence
agencies provided faulty or erroneous intelligence
on Iraq to President Bush and other government officials. But
the committee deferred the much more politically sensitive
issue as to whether the president and the vice president
themselves, or other administration officials, misrepresented
intelligence information to bolster the case to go
to war. An Intelligence Committee spokesperson
says the panel is still working on this second phase
of the investigation.
Had the withheld information been
turned over, according to administration and congressional
sources, it likely would have shifted a portion of
the blame away from the intelligence agencies to the
Bush administration as to who was responsible for the
erroneous information being presented to the American
public, Congress, and the international community.
In April 2004, the Intelligence Committee released
a report that concluded that "much of the information
provided or cleared by the Central Intelligence Agency
for inclusion in Secretary Powell's [United Nation's]
speech was overstated, misleading, or incorrect."
Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee say
that their investigation was hampered by the refusal
of the White House to turn over key documents, although
Republicans said the documents were not as central
to the investigation.
In addition to withholding drafts of Powell's speech
-- which included passages written by Libby -- the
administration also refused to turn over to the committee
contents of the president's morning intelligence briefings
on Iraq, sources say. These documents, known as the
Presidential Daily Brief, or PDB, are a written summary
of intelligence information and analysis provided by
the CIA to the president.
One congressional source said, for example, that senators
wanted to review the PDBs to determine whether dissenting
views from the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence
and Research, the Department of Energy, and other agencies
that often disagreed with the CIA on the question of
Iraq's programs to develop weapons of mass destruction
were being presented to the president.
An administration spokesperson said that the White
House was justified in turning down the document demand
from the Senate, saying that the papers reflected "deliberative
discussions" among "executive branch principals" and
were thus covered under longstanding precedent and
executive privilege rules. Throughout the president's
five years in office, the Bush administration has been
consistently adamant about not turning internal documents
over to Congress and other outside bodies. [...] |
Karl Rove's only full-time foreign-policy
advisor is Michael Ledeen, a rabid anti-Arab, pro-Israel
activist. The FBI is investigating Ledeen for procuring
forged documents on nonexistent WMD, which George Bush
used to justify his war on Iraq. When Joseph Wilson
exposed the farce, Rove helped "out" Wilson's
CIA wife. Did Ledeen procure the documents for Rove,
and how might he have done that? The story includes
multinational stool pigeon Rocco Martino, Italian spy
Francesco Pazienza, wanted CIA spy Robert Seldon Lady,
and Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin, who's under charges
of giving US secrets to Israel. Karl Rove's foreign-policy
advisor, Michael Ledeen, proclaimed "the rightness
of the fascist cause" in 1972. In 1984 he got
George Bush Sr to appoint Iranian arms merchant and
Iranian/Israeli double-agent Manucher Ghorbanifar as
a middleman in the scandalous Iran-Contra affair. Ledeen
has been a fixture in Washington and Israel ever since,
advocating a modern version of the Crusades against
Islamic nations. Based on what he has said and written,
I believe Ledeen is insane.
Michael Ledeen, Rove's "brain," is
one of the leading advocates for a US attack on
Iran. The Washington Post quoted Ledeen
as saying that Rove told him, "Anytime you
have a good idea, tell me." I guess that means
we can look forward to the Bush team drumming up
a war with Iran. [For more, see articles by Dan
Froomkin of the Washington Post -- the main man
of the mainstream media pursuing the Rove Scandal.]
George Bush Jr., when he assumed the presidency in
2000, already knew that he was going to settle the
family score with Saddam Hussein. His "brain," Rove,
quickly enlisted Ledeen to trump up a causus belli.
EARLY 2000: ROCCO MARTINO AND THE FRENCH CONNECTION
Rocco Martino is a 66-year-old Italian gentleman who
worked on and off for the Italian SISMI (analogous
to the CIA) for many years and who also peddled the
same information to various spy organizations and publications
-- a convicted felon and international stool pigeon,
just the kind of person Ledeen's associates needed.
After being fired by SISMI (for receiving stolen checks,
among other things), he convinced the French intelligence
in 2000 that he knew all about Africa and the trafficking
of conventional and nonconventional arms. To avoid
stepping on the toes of Italian intelligence, the French
gave him a contact, or handler, in Brussels. Martino's
handler in Brussels asked him to obtain every type
of news or reference to contraband uranium from Niger
("NYE-jer) -- a former French colony in the Sahara
desert (not to be confused with ex-British Nigeria
in W. Africa), where mining was under the jurisdiction
of two companies controlled by the gigantic French
mining company Cogema.
Martino soon was knocking at the door of the embassy
of Niger in Rome, where he met an Italian functionary
(a "lady," by most reports -- but this was
no lady, but rather ROBERT SELDON LADY, a CIA operative).
Martino provided the French with documents showing
that Iraq may have been planning to expand trade with
Niger. In fact, the first set of documents did not
refer to uranium, and the trade plans were probably
the typical sort of relationship Arab oil states had
with a whole range of third-world countries.
Martino was surprised when he saw that the French
immediately jumped to the wrong conclusion and thought
that the documents indicated an Iraqi interest in uranium.
(We now know that Iraq had no nuclear program.) "We
need additional confirmation and more detailed information," said
the French secret service. Martino set out to satisfy
his French patrons with additional documents.
JANUARY 2001 BREAK-IN
AT NIGER EMBASSY
At night, between the first and second of the January
2001, a mysterious thief came to the embassy of Niger
in Rome and into the residence of the counselor in
charge. It turned out that some letterhead and seals
(see photocopy) were missing. A second dossier on Niger-Iraq
trade soon came into Martino's hands, one that included
references to uranium trafficking. Martino claims he
got it from embassy personnel and that he thought it
was authentic.
Martino passed it on to the French secret service,
who had paid for it, and also to Panorama [a magazine
owned by Bush ally and Italian president Silvio Berlusconi],
which assessed it by dispatching a female reporter
to Niger. Panorama also turned the file over to the
US Embassy in Rome for cross-checking in the US.
The female journalist soon told Martino that the trip
to Niger had not produced any real confirmation, and
also the French confirmed to Martino that the reports
he had passed on to them were groundless. In other
words, Bush's war rationale was debunked way back in
2001 by amateur and professional sleuths.
Furthermore, it was a very amateurish forgery, not
likely produced through official channels by any state
intelligence agency with their vast resources. However,
it was soon resuscitated as the Bush administration,
in its first year, ramped up its public relations campaign
for war.
ROME MEETING IN DECEMBER 2001
Michael Ledeen organized a meeting in Rome to gather
evidence to support the planned war. Present were:
1. Michael Ledeen, Karl Rove's foreign policy advisor
and organizer of the meeting 2. Nicolo Pollari, head
of the the Italian equivalent of the CIA, the SISMI
3. Italy's Minister of Defense, Antonio Martino (no
relation apparently to the spy Rocco Martino), Pollari's
boss 4. Larry Franklin, an American who presently is
being prosecuted in the US for giving classified information
to an Israeli front group, AIPAC (American Israel Public
Affairs Committee) -- which some would call "spying," even
though he has not been charged with espionage 5. Harold
Rhode: member of Dick Cheney's Office of Special Plans,
protege of Ledeen, go-between with Iraqi exile and
CIA asset (at the time) Ahmed Chalabi.
This little group dusted off Martino's discredited
second dossier on Iraq-Niger trade, with the uranium
references. The Bush administration now had its causus
belli.
CAUSUS BELLI: A PIECE OF CRAP
The accompanying figure shows a bit of the cobbled-up
intelligence report on stolen letterheads, forged by
amateurs -- most likely Ledeen's friend, Francesco
Panzienza. This document, which can be viewed at the
Israeli site http://www.4law.co.il/Le838k.html, is
the "evidence" on which George Bush sent
almost two thousand young Americans and untold thousands
of Iraqi civilians to their deaths.
SPRING 2002: JOE WILSON TO NIGER
Former US Ambassador (to Gabon) Joseph Wilson made
the trip, apparently at the behest of the CIA, to determine
the authenticity of the charges in Martino's documents,
even though the CIA already could see they were forgeries.
Even the Panorama reporter could have saved him the
trouble. Wilson reported back to the CIA that there
was no proof that Iraq had sought uranium in Niger.
The US government knew there was no proof.
FALL 2002: USING THE CRAP
In London, Tony Blair spoke on September 24, 2002,
for the first time on the attempts of Saddam Hussein
to obtain uranium from Africa. Bush soon began to drive
in the nail using the same argument. Remember, Martino
had delivered the phony dossier this was based on to
the US embassy in Rome over a year before. The US State
Department and CIA rejected it and even Panorama had
debunked it. The Pentagon, too, knew it was false,
of course, but the Wolfowitz-Feith-Perle Defense Policy
Board axis plus Bush and Cheney and their respective
aides, Karl Rove and I. Lewis Libby (both now subjects
of interest to US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and his
grand jury in Washington, DC), went with it anyway.
The Rest is History: "The British Government
has learned that Saddam Hussein...
...recently sought significant quantities of uranium
from Africa." Sixteen little words in Bush's January
2003 State of the Union message that will be remembered
in history with more honorable presidential words like, "The
only thing we have to fear is fear itself" (FDR).
Bush was going on the forged documents procured by
Rocco Martino, debunked by all pertinent experts, and
debunked by Joseph Wilson. The US overcame Iraqi opposition
-- temporarily (resistance became "suicide," now
wonders, for whom?) -- mainly by bombing civilian structures
rather than fighting, beginning on March 19, 2003 [...] |
WASHINGTON (AP) - Karl Rove won't
be indicted Friday as prosecutors and his lawyers try
to resolve questions in the CIA leak investigation,
two people close to Rove told The Associated Press.
The White House still braced for an indictment against
another top aide.
In discussions Thursday, Rove's
lawyer was told by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's
office that investigators had not completed their
investigation into Rove's conduct in the case and
they would continue investigating, the people
said, speaking only on condition of anonymity because
of grand jury secrecy.
Fitzgerald scheduled a 2 p.m. EDT news conference
in Washington, along with an FBI investigator in the
case.
The decision means Rove is not out of legal jeopardy
but will continue working at the White House and cooperating
with prosecutors. He has already testified four times
before the grand jury investigating who leaked Valerie
Plame's CIA identity.
The news wasn't expected to be as favorable for Vice
President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
White House colleagues expected an indictment charging
Libby with false statements in the probe.[...] |
The Vice President
of the United States is actively lobbying for torture
right now. Not in the 1800's. Not in the 1950's. Right
now. And the sick thing is -- he has an excellent chance
of winning.
We look back at things like the McCarthy Hearings
or Japanese internment camps and shake our heads
in disbelief.
Can you believe what happened in America back then?
After seeing what's happening right now, the answer
is -- absolutely, I see exactly how it happened.
There is a defense spending bill that is in conference
committee right now with an amendment attached to it
that says the US must follow the Army Field Manual
when dealing with detainees and must not treat people
it captures with "cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment." Can you imagine anything less debatable?
Of course, we are now debating it. And we might lose.
The Vice President went down personally to the Senate
to try to kill this amendment earlier in the process.
The Senate showed rare courage and independence by
voting against him 90-9. The nine Senators who voted
in favor of "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" should
never be allowed to walk into our Congress again. They
soil the ground they walk on. That is hallowed ground.
All those patriots didn't die so these men could say
America stands for darkness.
These men are traitors to the idea and principles
of America. And now one of them is leading the conference
committee that will decide whether the amendment will
be in the final bill. Ted "Bridge to Nowhere" Stevens
(R- Alaska) is one of the Republicans who voted for
torture and he is charged with representing the Senate
on this bill. Of course, the House has already voiced
their opinion in favor of torture (there was no formal
vote in the House, but their representatives are lobbying
to kill the amendment in conference).
As I write this, I think, what kind
of a world do we live in? What have we become?
I still can't believe this is the America I love and
cherish. The America that was supposed to bring freedom
and enlightenment to the rest of the world. The beacon
of light.
I continue ... the President
has threatened to veto the entire defense spending
bill if he is not allowed to continue torturing people. Just
yesterday there was another report of at least 21
homicides of detainees under our supervision. We
beat and strangled some of these people to death. I
guess this is the type of thing Rush Limbaugh would
call a frat house prank.
What have we become?
The House and the Senate are trying to decide whether
we should continue to torture people or leave bad enough
alone. The thought of holding the people who ordered
and condoned these actions accountable hasn't even
crossed anyone's mind yet.
How can this administration argue
that it was a few rogue soldiers who committed the
abuses at Abu Ghraib (and all of the other prisons
all over Iraq and Afghanistan), when they are arguing
for the right to treat detainees with "cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment" right now?
These are the people who said they were going to bring
dignity and morality back into the White House. I know
a lot of people voted for this President because they
thought he is a good Christian, just like them. Let
me ask you, is this what Christianity is all about?
Do good Christians argue for cruelty, degradation and
inhumanity?
Either Christianity is twisted or Bush has twisted
Christianity. Either way, if you claim to be a moral
person proud of being a Christian, stand up against
this barbarity or never speak of morality again.
This is not some long past error that is too late
to correct. The final vote on this bill still hasn't
taken place. We can make a difference. We can stand
up for the real America.
Or we can admit to ourselves that we have become a
country of cruel and degrading inhumanity -- a country
of torturers. Jesus, what have we become? |
GENEVA, Oct 25 (IPS) - U.S.
human rights groups have denounced before the U.N.
Human Rights Committee that there are perhaps dozens
of secret detention centres around the world where
Washington is holding an unknown number of prisoners
as part of its "war on terror".
This week in Geneva, the Committee began to examine
the United States' compliance with the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, particularly
with regard to its anti-terrorism activities.
On Monday, the members of the Committee, made up of
18 independent experts with recognised competence in
the field of human rights, heard presentations from
U.S. non-governmental organisations that accuse Washington
of grave rights violations.
Priti Patel, an attorney and representative of the
New-York based group Human Rights First, reported to
the Committee members on the secret detention centres
for individuals allegedly linked to terrorism.
"There are locations you know
about, like Guantánamo, Abu Ghraib, and Bagram
in Afghanistan," commented Patel, "but there
are other locations which you know exist, but you don't
know exactly how many or where they are."
According to Patel, these are transient facilities
in Iraq and Afghanistan that are close to conflict
zones, but move around, to wherever the United States
decides.
"There are around 20 of them in Afghanistan,
but you don't know how many people are being held there,
and you don't know how they are being treated," Patel
told IPS.
"And then there is the worst case scenario, which
is you don't know even their location," she added.
For example, Patel remarked, "we don't know if
people have been held in Diego Garcia (a small island
in the Indian Ocean, home to a U.S. military base),
but we have enough credible reports to make us believe
it."
And while the United States refuses to deny or confirm
the existence of these secret detention centres, "we
know that at least 36 people have been held in secret
locations," she stressed. [...] |
TOLEDO, Ohio - A coin dealer
and major GOP donor at the center of a scandal in Ohio
state government was charged Thursday with illegally
funneling $45,400 in contributions to President Bush's
re-election bid.
Tom Noe was accused in a federal
indictment of giving money to 24 friends and associates,
who then made the campaign contributions in their
own names. In that way, he skirted the $2,000 limit
on individual contributions, prosecutors said.
"It's one of the most blatant and excessive finance
schemes we have encountered," said Noel Hillman,
section chief of the U.S. Department of Justice's public
integrity section.
Calls to the White House and Noe's attorneys were
not immediately returned. Prosecutors said the Bush
campaign has cooperated with their investigation.
Noe also is under investigation over an ill-fated
$50 million investment in rare coins he managed for
the state workers' compensation fund. Noe has acknowledged
that up to $13 million is missing, and Ohio's attorney
general has accused him of stealing as much as $6 million.
But no charges have been filed in that case.
The coin dealer contributed more than $105,000 to
Republicans, including Bush and Gov. Bob Taft, during
the last campaign. [...]
U.S. Attorney Gregory White said prosecutors were
negotiating Noe's surrender with his lawyer. If convicted,
Noe faces up to 15 years in prison and fines up to
$950,000. |
The
Miers Fiasco
White House in Meltdown |
By ALEXANDER COCKBURN and
JEFFREY ST. CLAIR
Counterpunch.org
October 27, 2005 |
Maybe for a moment George Bush
thought Bill Frist was calling late Wednesday evening
to tell him he was quitting as Senate majority leader
on account of his own deepening legal problems, stemming
from insider stock deals.
But no, Frist was phoning about problems not his
own. He told Bush that the conservative Republican
mutiny over the Miers nomination had carried the
day. The votes for Miers just weren't there.
Thursday morning Bush called it quits, using executive
privilege as the excuse. Supposedly at issue were disclosure
requests for legal memos Miers had written as part
her job as White House counsel.
At least, since night had fallen, Bush could be confident
it wasn't a call to tell him that the federal grand
jury assembled at the US District Court had issued
indictments against top White House aides Rove, Libby,
Hadley, Hanna and Wurmser, with Cheney as unindicted
coconspirator.
That treat, or portions of it, awaits Bush on Friday.
If he has time for any political counsel Rove may have
advised Bush it was better to throw the Miers bone
to the Republican ultras today. Then to rally them
to the President's side over the weekend, when indictments
may dominate the headlines and the Sunday talk shows.
[...]
Bush, after five years, is now at the point Clinton
reached in the early summer of his first year in office:
a total collapse in political credibility. Clinton
reached out to a Republican fixer, David Gergen, and
to Jesse Helms' campaign strategist, Dickie Morris,
plus the most squalid denizens of his own party.
Who can Bush turn to?
The first lifeline would be a dishonorable mention
of Dick Cheney in the grand jury's indictment, prompting
the all-powerful vice president to resign.
The path would then be clear for a
return of the old guard, with James Baker the
man who fixed Florida for Bush in 2001, as the Renovator.
The corporate sponsorship of the White House would
shift from Halliburton to the Carlyle Group.
It would be the Revenge of
Bush 1, already heralded by the recent onslaughts
on Cheney's neocons by Brent Scowcroft and Powell's
number two, Lawrence Wilkerson. It's a theme
worthy of the great classical tragedians. |
As a legal noose appears to be
tightening around the Bush/Cheney/Rove inner circle,
a shocking government report shows the floor under
the legitimacy of their alleged election to the White
House is crumbling.
The latest critical confirmation
of key indicators that the election of 2004 was stolen
comes in an extremely powerful, penetrating report
from the General Accounting Office that has gotten
virtually no mainstream media coverage.
The government's lead investigative agency is known
for its general incorruptibility and its through, in-depth
analyses. Its concurrence with
assertions widely dismissed as "conspiracy theories" adds
crucial new weight to the case that Team Bush has no
legitimate business being in the White House.
Nearly a year ago, senior Judiciary Committee Democrat
John Conyers (D-MI) asked the GAO to investigate electronic
voting machines as they were used during the November
2, 2004 presidential election. [...]
The non-partisan
GAO report has now found that, "some of [the]
concerns about electronic voting machines have been
realized and have caused problems with recent elections,
resulting in the loss and miscount of votes." [...]
Among other things, the GAO confirms that:
1. Some electronic voting machines "did
not encrypt cast ballots or system audit logs, thus
making it possible to alter them without detection." [...]
3. "Falsifying election
results without leaving any evidence of such an action
by using altered memory cards" can easily be
done, according to the GAO.
4. The GAO also confirms that "access to the
voting network was easily compromised because not all
digital recording electronic voting systems (DREs)
had supervisory functions password-protected, so access
to one machine provided access to the whole network." This
critical finding confirms that rigging the 2004 vote
did not require a "widespread conspiracy" but
rather the cooperation of a very small number of operatives
with the power to tap into the networked machines and
thus change large numbers of votes at will. With
800,000 votes cast on electronic machines in Ohio,
flipping the number needed to give Bush 118,775 could
be easily done by just one programmer. [...]
In essence, the GAO study makes
it clear that no bank, grocery store or mom & pop
chop shop would dare operate its business on a computer
system as flimsy, fragile and easily manipulated
as the one on which the 2004 election turned. [...] |
"Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first
we practice to deceive!"
--Walter Scott
The conspiracy that bubbles around Judith Miller
protecting a source -- whose name she couldn't remember
-- and Robert Novak using his column to out undercover
CIA operative Valerie Plame should soon evaporate.
The next step should lead Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald
to the heart of the matter: a much more pernicious
conspiracy designed to mislead the United States
into war with Iraq. The crime
to name a covert CIA official pales in comparison
with conspiring to lead the nation to war under false
pretenses. [...]
Now, it begins to emerge that the White House undertook
a major effort to mislead and manipulate the media
and U.S. public opinion in general in order to get
support for an unjust war. [...]
The unraveling of the Valerie Plame affair is but
a step toward exposing this truly epic scam. Beyond
compromising the identity of a CIA officer, the Bush
administration had carried out what former intelligence
official Larry Johnson called "a classic 'covert
action' program against the citizens of the United
States." [...]
Thanks to the prolonged investigation over the Plame
case, some members of the media and the rest of the
public have regained their bearings. Some
reporters might even recall that right after Novak
published Plame's name, Bush promised publicly that
he would fire any staff involved.
In July, he weakened that threat to: "If someone
committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration." [...]
Bush continues to act as if none of this concerns
him and the justice of his war effort. The
next time he says we're going to "stay the course" in
Iraq, the Democrats should respond by claiming that
Bush wants to stay the course of total failure and
pay for it with the lives and maimed bodies of young
men and women. [...]
Saul Landau is a fellow of the Institute for Policy
Studies. |
WASHINGTON - The grand jury probe
into the leak of a covert CIA officer's name has opened
a new window into how the Bush administration used
intelligence from dubious sources to make a case for
a pre-emptive war and discarded information that undercut
its rationale for attacking Iraq. [...]
A Knight Ridder review of the administration's arguments,
its own reporting at the time and the Senate Intelligence
Committee's 2004 report shows that the White House
followed a pattern of using questionable intelligence,
even documents that turned out to be forgeries, to
support its case - often leaking classified information
to receptive journalists - and dismissing information
that undermined the case for war.
The State of the Union speech was one of a number
of instances in which Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney
and their aides ignored the qualms of intelligence
professionals and instead relied on the claims of Iraqi
defectors and other suspect sources or, in the case
of Niger, the crudely forged documents. [...]
U.S. intelligence had no evidence of any alliance
between Iraq and al-Qaida, and many analysts doubted
that Saddam would give such weapons to Islamic extremists.
[...]
The White House, however, based its case on an analysis
by a secretive Pentagon unit formed by then Undersecretary
of Defense Douglas Feith, a proponent of attacking
Iraq. The Pentagon analysis concluded that Saddam and
al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden were working together.
The Pentagon and the CIA later disowned the findings.
[...] |
CHICAGO - The U.S. dollar, Treasurys
and American stocks could sell off if top White House
aides are indicted on charges they leaked the identity
of a CIA employee, analysts said Thursday. [...]
Any charges could create "political paralysis" at
the White House, said Brian Dolan, head of currency
research at New Jersey-based trading firm Gain Capital.
Charges would be "detrimental
to the dollar, a psychological blow," said Alex
Beuzelin, senior market analyst with Ruesch International
in Washington. They would distract Bush from
important economic issues like high energy prices,
patches of slower growth and deficit reduction, he
said. [...]
"A spike in interest rates
from current levels could potentially prick the housing
bubble, which Fed Chairman nominee Ben Bernanke
is convinced does not exist," said Peter Schiff,
president of Euro Pacific Capital. [...]
The best historical reference for investors may be
the fallout of the Watergate scandal, which
was limited to Nixon aides, although did ultimately
lead to the president's resignation, said Dolan.
But the U.S. was just coming off the gold standard
at that time, so currency markets behaved differently
than they do today. [...]
The greenback fell over several days
to a four-month low against the Japanese yen during
December 1998, when the House approved two articles
of impeachment against Clinton.
But that example differs from the current situation
somewhat, says Dolan, because it directly touched the
president.
If anything, investors are looking
for any excuse to lighten some dollar holdings; it's
made a six-week charge without much pause against
the yen, to two-year highs, driven almost exclusively
by bets for higher U.S. interest rates. The dollar
is just off three-month highs against the euro. [...]
This story was supplied by MarketWatch. For further information
see www.marketwatch.com. |
DALLAS - Exxon
Mobil Corp. rewrote the corporate record books Thursday
as the oil company's third-quarter earnings
soared to almost $10 billion and it
became the first public company ever with quarterly
sales topping $100 billion. Anglo-Dutch competitor
Royal Dutch Shell PLC wasn't far behind, posting
a profit of $9 billion for the quarter.
Those results led Democrats in Congress to demand
a new windfall profits tax. "Big
oil behemoths are making out like bandits, while
the average American family is getting killed by
high gas prices, and soon-to-be record heating oil
prices," Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in
a statement.
But Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said President
Bush opposes such a move and is instead considering
a wide range of proposals to help cushion consumers,
including the creation of an emergency reserve of gasoline
and other refined products. [...] |
WASHINGTON - Along with ebbing
public support for the Iraq War, US President George
W. Bush also faces diminishing backing for his domestic
agenda, from tax cuts to homeland security, according
to a poll published.
Forty-three percent of those asked by a Harris
Interactive survey for The Wall Street Journal supported
Bush's proposal to make tax cuts passed during his
first mandate permanent, down from 52 percent in
August.
Fifty percent disapproved of
Bush's position on homeland security, against
43 percent who approved, the poll showed.
Additionally, 53 percent disagreed with his environmental
policies with 34 percent backing them, while 53 percent
also disapproved of his efforts to provide hurricane
relief against 43 percent in favor.
On Bush's appointments to the US Supreme Court, 49
percent disapproved compared to 41 percent who approved.
Separate findings from the same
survey of 1,833 people from October 11-17, published
by the newspaper on Tuesday, found that for the first
time, a majority of respondents thought the Iraq war
was the "wrong thing to do". |
Let us never forget that "those who refuse
to learn from history are doomed to repeat it." -
George Santayana
228 years ago, a great experiment was undertaken
that has since shaped the world in a way never thought
possible by mankind. A small group of colonists decided
to break away from their king and empire and declare
themselves an independent nation and free from the
tyranny and unjust treatment of that empire. What
started out from most humble beginnings would eventually
encompass the globe with its power and influence.
Like all empires before it, it too will one day cease
to remain at the height of its glory and will eventually
succumb to its excesses and egocentric view. [...]
Like empires of the past, the United States is indeed
an empire in both scale and influence. Unlike any other
empires before it, however, the United States is one
that spans the globe and even reaches out into space.
The reasons that our nation has risen to such power
and influence in such a short time scale are many and
varied, but a few need to be noted in particular, as
they are some of the key elements of our nation that
have been the most changed.
The system of government in the United States was
born out of great deliberation and effort, borrowing
ideas and concepts from several previous systems of
governing and government that eventually culminated
into what we see today. A framework that denotes the
citizenry as the primary focus is one that is both
bold in concept and noble in principle. We enjoy a
system of economy that was meant to benefit and encourage
forward thinking, hard work, and freedom from most
governmental control. We were the first nation that
by our very design has encouraged not only a melting
pot of cultures, but a mix of ideas that would eventually
result in the world's greatest system in nearly every
aspect of how a civilization is measured.
Unlike the empires of Rome and the former Soviet Union,
the United States does not rely upon satellite states
for the purpose of buffering from invasion or as its
primary means of economic well being. However the United
States does most certainly have a de facto system of
host states. It should be noted that, according to
a publication from the Department of Defense [i], the
United States currently has a military presence in
192 nations and troops stationed in 135 of them. This
means the United States has a military presence in
just over 70% of the world's nations, making the United
States far more influential and widespread than any
empire before it.
The 2006 United States military budget is slated at
441.6 billion dollars which is as much as that of the
next 17 largest nations combined. This means that the
United States has spent nearly as much money as the
entire rest of the world on military expenditures and
six times as much as Russia, which is the world's second
largest military budget. This does not include the
additional "supplemental" monies already
requested by President Bush for Iraq and Afghanistan
to the tune of 81 billion dollars. Nor does it include
money in the budget devoted to military spending for
Defense/Civil programs ($44.5 billion);, Homeland Security
($33.3 billion);, and Veterans Affairs ($68.3 billion),
all pushing the total closer to 668.7 billion dollars.
In addition when we add in the fact that a good deal
of this money is borrowed and comes with interest,
which of course is rarely considered publicly in budget
requests, this adds approximately 130 billion to the
bill, making a round about figure of 799 billion dollars.
In essence the United States is realistically spending
about 30% of its total government funding on the military...
[...]
As the face of global warfare changes it seems that
for once the United States is lagging behind, not because
we have the world's largest military but in spite of
it. The future of global warfare is not one of bullets
but one of dollars. This is one commodity we are starting
to fall behind in as we are financially leveraged all
the way up to our grandchildren. As the economies of
the European Union, Russia and especially of China
are surging forward with greater and greater growth,
the United States is running up trade and budget deficits
that offset a greater portion of our own growth. Using
history as a guide, it becomes very clear that the
United States, like many empires before it, has turned
to militarism as a means to cling to its current hegemony.
[...]
Manufacturing jobs have decreased from 34% in 1950
to just 13% currently, in contrast, service based jobs
have increased from 59% to 82% during the same time
period.[iv] Industries hardest hit by this change in
our economic base have been the textile and steel manufacturing
sectors which have been traditional staples of the
US economy. Boeing has been surpassed by Airbus as
the worlds leading manufacture of aircraft. Ford and
Chevy stocks have been relegated to junk status as
Toyota now leads the world in the manufacture of automobiles.
The United States is once again poised to become a
net importer of food, something that has not been the
case for over 50 years.
Our consumption in relation to the rest of the world
is well documented. The United States, with less than
5% of the global population, uses about a quarter of
the world's fossil fuel resources - burning up nearly
25% of the coal, 26% of the oil, and 27% of the world's
natural gas. As of 2003, the U.S. had more private
cars than licensed drivers, and gas-guzzling sport
utility vehicles were among the best-selling vehicles.
New houses in the U.S. were 38 % bigger in 2002 than
in 1975, despite having fewer people per household
on average. According to an article in Scientific American,
if the rest of the world were to rise to the same level
of consumption as that of the United States it would
require the resources of four more planet Earths. |
When former First Lady Barbara
Bush was shown at the Houston Minute Maid Park for
the final game of the Chicago White Sox-Houston Astros
World Series, she was roundly booed at one watering
hole here in the nation's capital.
It was at the Houston Astrodome following Hurricane
Katrina that Mrs. Bush commented that "underprivileged" evacuees
from New Orleans had a pretty good deal -- "this
is working well for them." The editor suspects
that Mrs. Bush's appearance at the World Series was
booed in more places than Washington, DC. |
The Federal Opposition has accused
the Government of being "drunk with power" after
announcing it will present two major pieces of legislation
into Parliament on consecutive days.
The Government plans to introduce the anti-terrorism
laws on Melbourne Cup day and the workplace relations
package the day after.
Labor's Stephen Smith thinks it is proof the Government
is out of control.
"This whole process angers me because what we
find is a Government drunk with power, arrogantly ramming
things through the Parliament," he said. [...]
Mr Beazley believes Mr Howard is trying to hide behind
the famous horse race to avoid scrutiny of the legislation.
[...]
"Now we've seen them do some pretty low things
over the years but hiding behind
Australia's great national sporting event, the Melbourne
Cup, to have Parliament debate and pass through your
shoot-to-kill laws is as low as you can go," Mr
Beazley said. [...] |
Mars, Nasa/Space Science Institute
Mars will not be this close until 2018 Mars is set
for a close encounter with Earth, approaching to within
69.4 million km (43.1 million miles) of our planet
in the early hours of Sunday.
With good conditions and a lack of cloud, amateur
astronomers will be able to get an unusually good
look at Mars.
The Red Planet will not swing this close to Earth
for another 13 years. [...] |
For India's astrologers, even
at 69,4-million kilometers away, Mars is too close
for comfort.
The red planet, named after the Roman god of war,
will be at its closest to Earth since 2003 on Saturday
and won't come as near for another decade, prompting
some astrologers to predict trouble, destruction
and plain old bad luck.
"Mars influences Earth in a
big way and these days it is very close. This sort
of period is adverse for humanity as a whole. Various
places on Earth will see earthquakes, tornados, fires
and volcanic eruptions," said Ashok Kumar Joshi,
an Indian astrologer.
Astrology has been practiced in India
for thousands of years as part of a widely held belief
system that the future can be divined from planets'
movements in relation to the stars.
The previous Hindu nationalist-led government went
so far as to push for it as an area of scientific study
at the university level, despite
most scientists dismissing astrological predictions
as pure superstition.
But both astronomers and astrologers agree that Mars
is coming close and is sitting in one zodiac house,
a celestial section defined by star patterns as seen
from Earth, for six months instead of the usual 45
days.
Astrologers say this phenomenon explains why Earth
has been hit recently by a series of hurricanes and
earthquakes.
"Mars, which is known to be destructive, is sitting
on Aries. Two months are gone and we have four more
to go. Natural disasters related to fire, earth, air
and water might affect people the world over," leading
Indian astrologer Niraj Mancchanda said on his website.
Astrologer Joshi said the 7,6-magnitude earthquake
that hit northwestern Pakistan and parts of Indian-administered
Kashmir on October 8, was a direct result of a rare
combination of killer planetary forces and numerology.
"The worst is not yet over and bigger earthquakes
could follow," he said, adding hurricanes Katrina
and Wilma were also directly related to the planetary
alignment.
In the United States last week, CNN
journalist Wolf Blitzer raised eyebrows when he asked
evangelical Christian minister Jerry Falwell if recent
natural disasters meant the biblical end of days was
on the way. Falwell said he wasn't qualified to forecast
the end of the world. [...]
"Communities should hold special prayers as they
create positive vibes in the atmosphere. It will change
the energy equilibrium and it will become favourable
with the sound of mantras." |
Sun worshippers took to Brighton
beach in their hundreds yesterday, where the temperature
hit 18.1 C. In Kinlochewe on the far north-west coast
of Scotland, it was a balmy 22.4 C.
Just four days before Hallowe'en,
Britain was enjoying the warmest 27 October since
records began in 1880.
As the UK basked in the freakish heat, it seemed almost
churlish to seek an explanation. But these days, in
the shadow of global warming, extreme weather patterns
come with a health warning attached. Why was it so
warm?
The weather experts explained that the mini-heatwave
was the result of a large area of high pressure over
southeastern Europe and low pressure well to the west
of Ireland.
Sandwiched in between these two weather systems was
Britain, which happily found itself right in the way
of a warm southerly breeze blowing directly from the
hot sands of north Africa. The dryness of the air was
explained by it coming from the continent rather than
from the Atlantic. The Scottish glens enjoyed the added
benefit of a meteorological phenomenon known as the
Fone effect, when air warms even further after descending
from higher ground.
Is this yet more evidence of climate change? Was this
the sort of October day Britain might expect in a world
where global warming has become reality?
The Prince of Wales said yesterday
that climate change was one of the greatest problems
facing man. Meanwhile,
the chief scientist, Sir David King, reiterated his
belief that global warming was a greater threat than
terrorism. [...] |
BULLETIN:
TROPICAL STORM BETA INTERMEDIATE ADVISORY NUMBER 6A
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
8 AM EDT FRI OCT 28 2005
...TROPICAL STORM BETA GETTING CLOSER TO SAN ANDRES
AND PROVIDENCIA AS IT CONTINUES TO MOVE SLOWLY NORTHWARD...
A HURRICANE WARNING REMAINS IN EFFECT FOR THE ISLANDS
OF SAN ANDRES AND PROVIDENCIA.
A TROPICAL STORM WARNING AND A HURRICANE
WATCH REMAIN IN EFFECT FOR THE ENTIRE CARIBBEAN
COAST OF NICARAGUA FROM THE BORDER WITH COSTA RICA
NORTHWARD TO CABO GRACIAS A DIOS NEAR THE NICARAGUA/HONDURAS
BORDER...AND ADJACENT ISLANDS. HURRICANE
WARNINGS WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FOR PORTIONS OF
THE COAST OF NICARAGUA LATER TODAY.
A HURRICANE WARNING MEANS THAT
HURRICANE CONDITIONS ARE EXPECTED WITHIN THE WARNING
AREA WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS. [...] |
NEW YORK - New York City has
many odors, but when the city began to smell a little
too good, New Yorkers became alarmed.
Residents from the southern tip of Manhattan to
the Upper West Side nearly 10 miles north called
a city hot line to report a
strong odor Thursday night that most compared to
maple syrup, The New York Times reported Friday.
There were so many calls that the city's Office of
Emergency Management coordinated efforts with the Police
and Fire Departments, the Coast Guard and the City
Department of Environmental Protection to find the
source of the mysterious smell.
Air tests haven't turned up anything harmful, but the
source was still a mystery.
"We are continuing to sample the air throughout
the affected area to make sure there's nothing hazardous," said
Jarrod Bernstein, an emergency management spokesman. "What
the actual cause of the smell is, we really don't know."
Although many compared the
smell to maple syrup, others said it reminded them
of vanilla coffee or freshly-baked cake. All
seemed to agree that it was a welcome change from
the usual city smells.
"It's like maple syrup. With Eggos (waffles).
Or pancakes," Arturo Padilla told The Times as
he walked in Lower Manhattan. "It's pleasant." |
Mysterious
blasts rattle Israelis
Dozens of readers tell Ynet about loud 'explosions'
heard overnight. Police: Likely sonic booms created by
Air Force planes. Army: It wasn't us |
Ynet reporters
10.28.05, 13:25 |
Late-night
mystery: Dozens of readers from across Israel
told Ynet about unusually loud "explosions" and
tremors throughout the night, but attempts to shed
light on the source of the blasts has been met with
uncertainty.
At least one possibility has been discounted, with the
country's seismological institute saying no earthquake
occurred.
Police officials estimated the loud sounds were a result
of sonic booms created by IDF fighter jets on their way
to attacking Gaza, but the army insisted there was no
unusual Air Force activity across the country overnight.
Central Police District Spokesman Yigal Haddad said police
received numerous calls overnight from concerned citizens
reporting explosions.
"The residents reported explosions heard from Netanya
(north of Tel Aviv) to Rishon Lezion (south of Tel Aviv.)
Many residents said the explosions came from the direction
of the sea," he said. "Police personnel who
heard the blasts themselves said they sounded like sonic
booms. We still don't know what caused the explosions. We
had similar reports during the week."
Meanwhile, police in Haifa also received calls regarding
a possible earthquake, but no damages were reported.
The nighttime explosions have apparently
become a routine occurrence throughout the Sharon region,
north of Tel Aviv. In recent nights there have been
other reported about blasts heard in the town of Herzliya,
but the source of them is unclear. [...]
|
CALIFORNIA - Bright twinklers
were nearby Mars and Venus, say astronomers -- or were
they?
Mysterious, bright lights in the night sky Wednesday
that alarmed or bemused scores of Bay Area residents
were not mysterious at all but most likely a pair
of planets whose orbits around the sun are carrying
them close to Earth right now.
Others are not so sure. [...]
Residents across California and people as far east
as Las Vegas reported seeing the lights in the sky
late Wednesday. Those who called space officials at
Vandenberg Air Force Base on the Central Coast and
the Federal Aviation Administration drew the usual
response Thursday: No, there were no missile launches,
no wandering airplane pilots had failed to file flight
plans, no military jets were aloft, and no one was
suggesting UFOs. [...] |
Belief in ghosts and the survival
of some immaterial essence beyond the span of human
life dates back thousands of years. Ancient Egyptians
would visit the family plots of departed relations
to provide food and clothing for the journey beyond,
and Enlightenment era-scientists conducted ghoulish
experiments to determine the precise location of the
soul. At the start of the 20th century, Duncan Macdougall,
a respected surgeon, thought he had determined the
precise weight of the soul by using an ornate Fairbanks
scale to track weight loss as people died.
Most religions tell us that the soul goes somewhere
after death - traveling to heaven, hell, or a pleasant
afterlife resort; reincarnating into a new body;
or remaining in the ground until the Second Coming.
Obviously, they can't all be right. But solid evidence
is tough to find, and despite some credible research
conducted by scientists, the results have been inconclusive
so far.
In a new book on attempts to settle the question,
Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife, author Mary Roach
ultimately concludes that although most accounts of
reincarnation and life after death aren't completely
convincing, not all can be easily explained away. After
a year on the road, visiting labs, observing supposedly
reincarnated children, and enrolling in a medium school,
she ends up by choosing to believe in the possibility
of an undefined "something" more.
My own research began in the 1970s, sparked by synchronicity
and an unexplainable "journey." After receiving
a book by Helena Blavatsky, the famous Russian occultist
and founder of the theosophical movement, published
in 1888 - the same year as a "lucky" silver
dollar I used to carry in my pocket and also the publication
date of an unusual antique book that had mysteriously "appeared" in
my apartment - I became curious about what such coincidences
might mean. That led to the discovery of a key turning
point in Blavatsky's life: her first encounter with
a psychic investigator named Henry Olcott in Vermont.
In 1874, Blavatsky followed Olcott to Chittenden,
a small town near Rutland, to see the "manifestations" of
William Eddy, an alleged medium. Their resulting alliance
led directly to the founding of theosophy, an impressive
synthesis of Buddhism, occultism, and Western philosophy
that became enormously influential in subsequent decades.
[...] |
On the fourth
anniversary of the September 11th attacks, Laura Knight-Jadczyk
announces the availability of her latest book:
In the years since the 9/11 attacks, dozens of books
have sought to explore the truth behind the official
version of events that day - yet to date, none of
these publications has provided a satisfactory answer
as to WHY the attacks occurred and who was ultimately
responsible for carrying them out.
Taking a broad, millennia-long perspective, Laura
Knight-Jadczyk's 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth uncovers the true nature of
the ruling elite on our planet and presents new and
ground-breaking insights into just how the 9/11 attacks
played out.
9/11: The Ultimate
Truth makes a strong case for the idea that September
11, 2001 marked the moment when our planet entered
the final phase of a diabolical plan that has been
many, many years in the making. It is a plan developed
and nurtured by successive generations of ruthless
individuals who relentlessly exploit the negative
aspects of basic human nature to entrap humanity as
a whole in endless wars and suffering in order to
keep us confused and distracted to the reality of
the man behind the curtain.
Drawing on historical and genealogical sources, Knight-Jadczyk
eloquently links the 9/11 event to the modern-day
Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also cites the clear
evidence that our planet undergoes periodic natural
cataclysms, a cycle that has arguably brought humanity
to the brink of destruction in the present day.
For its no nonsense style in cutting to the core
of the issue and its sheer audacity in refusing to
be swayed or distracted by the morass of disinformation
that has been employed by the Powers that Be to cover
their tracks, 9/11:
The Ultimate Truth can rightly claim to be THE
definitive book on 9/11 - and what that fateful day's
true implications are for the future of mankind.
Published by Red Pill Press
Scheduled for release in October
2005, readers can pre-order the book today at our bookstore. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|