|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
The price of oil closed at 67.57
dollars a barrel, up 2.2% from last Friday's close of
$66.13. The U.S. dollar closed at 0.7954 euros, down
2.3% from 0.8140 euros a week earlier, continuing a
negative trend for the dollar. The euro, then, would
buy 1.2573 dollars at Friday's close, up from $1.2285
the week before. The price of oil in euros was virtually
unchanged at 53.74 euros a barrel compared to 53.83
euros a barrel the previous Friday (down 0.2%). Gold
closed at 447.80 dollars an ounce, up 1.4% from last
week's close of $441.80. Gold in euros would be 356.16
euros an ounce, down 1% from last week's close of 359.63
euros an ounce. The gold/oil (the number of barrels
of oil an ounce of gold would buy) ratio closed at 6.63
down 0.8% from 6.68 a week earlier. In the U.S. stock
market, the Dow closed at 10,447.37 up 0.4% from the
previous week's close of 10,406.20. The NASDAQ closed
at 2141.07 on Friday, up 0.8% from the previous Friday's
close of 2123.99. The yield on the ten-year U.S. Treasury
note closed at 4.03 percent, down 15 basis points 4.18
the week before.
Hurricane Katrina, of course, dwarfed all other news
last week, and for good reason. The political, economic
and human repercussions of this event may prove decisive
in the months and years to come.
Economically, the disaster struck the United States
at a time when its economy was teetering on the brink
of collapse. Oil prices were already rising sharply,
the citizens and governments of the United States were
already drowning in debt, and consumer spending was
threatening to fall from the debt and higher energy
prices. The immediate effect of Katrina for U.S. citizens
was more than a dollar a gallon rise in the price of
gasoline. The previous rises in the price of gasoline
were blamed on too few refineries. Then Katrina took
four more refineries off-line. Add to that the damage
to 20
oil rigs and platforms and the importance of the
port of New Orleans for oil supertanker shipping and
you have an energy crisis in the United States which
has shaken the confidence of the citizenry. Steven Lagavulin
of the Deconsumption
blog sees high inflation and economic collapse as
likely results:
[8/31/05] Katrina is looking more and more like the
kind of "outside" event that could set the
whole house of cards tumbling down on us. The (not
really) Federal Reserve's damage control team was
out in force yesterday hammering gold and supporting
the dollar. The reports on the disruptions to the
oil industry--drilling, import-shipping, refining--just
look worse and worse. The Port of Louisiana is effectively
closed, halting all import / export traffic up the
Mississippi. And the insurance industry, which has
been hammered almost every year since 9/11, is going
to get hit with another doozy of a bill...I can't
even guess how it will survive this (oh, wait, yes
I can--the public will foot the bill for their underfunded
policies...).
And:
"Katrina is no 9/11. It may be much worse."
Good piece in Slate about the inflationary
aspects of the Katrina tragedy beyond just oil
& gas prices. Here's the gist:
"Economically speaking, Katrina is no 9/11.
It may be much worse. In the months after 9/11, stocks
rallied. The Federal Reserve slashed interest rates,
unleashing a wave of liquidity and paving the way
for economy-boosting gimmicks like zero-percent financing.
The airlines suffered a grievous blow. But prices
didn't jump; there were no shortages of anything.
Looking back, the catastrophe of 9/11 had a relatively
minor impact on the broad economy.
"And the consensus thus far seems to be that
Katrina will be much the same....But because of the
nature of the damage, the industries it affected,
the role the Gulf Coast plays in the national economy,
and the place we're at in the business cycle, Katrina
could prove to be inflationary. And as a result, the
damage it causes could ripple far beyond the Mississippi
Delta."
[...]
"The problem is that New Orleans lies at the
heavily trafficked intersection of the Old and New
Economies. The region's economy is based on agriculture,
water transport, and natural resources. But moving
and selling goods requires an intricate web of supply
chains, pipelines, and commercial arteries that connect
producers to consumers. The networked economy isn't
just about bytes and fiber-optic cable, it's about
oil, grain, and sugar. And when the infrastructure
of these networks gets damaged, it can't be replaced
easily or cheaply.
"If New Orleans were pure Old Economy - if,
for example, it simply grew wheat - its devastation
would not cost that much, because other wheat and
grain growers would replace it. If it were pure New
Economy, like Wall Street, it could bounce back instantly,
because its real assets (information and people) would
not be irretrievably lost. But because it's right
in the middle, the damage will be enormous."
[...]
"Energy isn't the only valuable commodity that
flows through New Orleans. As the Wall Street Journal
notes, New Orleans ports "handle roughly half
of the corn, wheat and soybeans exported from the
U.S., much of which reaches the city on barges traveling
on the Mississippi River."
Katrina has already screwed up the vital supply chains
that funnel goods from the Midwest to global markets
and from global markets to the Midwest. Farmers have
been floating grain to external markets on river barges
since the 18th century not because it offers speed,
but because it is the most economically efficient
means of doing so. As the Associated Press notes,
"The Mississippi River is the cheapest route
for shipping many crops and other commodities destined
for overseas markets." So, farmers looking to
get their goods to market will now have to rely on
more expensive modes of transport. And importers will
either have to eat higher costs or pass them along
to consumers. Until yesterday, about 25 percent of
Chiquita's banana imports arrived in the United States
at the company's Gulfport, Miss., facility. No longer.
The company, and many others, will have to scramble
to find alternate (and likely, more expensive) arrangements.
Finally, consider the agricultural staples that are
produced in huge volume in the Gulf Coast region and
that are used in a wide range of products in the United
States and overseas: oysters, chickens, cotton, and
sugar, to name a few. Katrina will have the effect
of making them more expensive and setting off a scramble
among the companies that need steady supplies to find
new sources. The shortages will drive up prices here
and make our exports more expensive - and less competitive
- abroad.
Beyond the immediate economic consequences, the confidence
of Americans and the confidence of the rest of the world
in the United States has been broken, perhaps beyond
repair. The value of the dollar was propped up for decades
by the world's basic confidence in the competence of
the United States as symbolized by U.S. Treasury bonds.
Even after the $6 billion a month disaster of the Iraq
War, many people still thought the United States was
"the sole remaining superpower." Now it is
clear that that power was little more than an empty
shell. The Iraq War has stretched governmental resources
so thin that it could not provide the most basic relief
services in the aftermath of the hurricane. Decades
of looting the resources of the republic, the "common
thing," for the benefit of the super-rich and well-connected
has finally caught up with the United States in an embarrassingly
public way. Here are the editors of the World Socialist
Web Site:
Hurricane
Katrina's aftermath: from natural disaster to national
humiliation
2 September 2005
The catastrophe that is unfolding
in New Orleans and on the Gulf coast of Mississippi
has been transformed into a national humiliation without
parallel in the history of the United States.
The scenes of intense human suffering, hopelessness,
squalor, and neglect amidst the wreckage of what was
once New Orleans have exposed the rotten core of American
capitalist society before the eyes of the entire world
- and, most significantly, before those of its own
stunned people.
The reactionary mythology of America as the "Greatest
Country in the World" has suffered a shattering
blow.
Hurricane Katrina has laid bare the awful truths
of contemporary America - a country torn by the most
intense class divisions, ruled by a corrupt plutocracy
that possesses no sense either of social reality or
public responsibility, in which millions of its citizens
are deemed expendable and cannot depend on any social
safety net or public assistance if disaster, in whatever
form, strikes.
Washington's response to this human tragedy has been
one of gross incompetence and criminal indifference.
People have been left to literally die in the streets
of a major American city without any assistance for
four days. Images of suffering and degradation that
resemble the conditions in the most impoverished Third
World countries are broadcast daily with virtually
no visible response from the government of a country
that concentrates the greatest share of wealth in
the world.
The storm that breached the levees of New Orleans
has also revealed all of the horrific implications
of 25 years' worth of uninterrupted social and political
reaction. The real results of the destruction of essential
social services, the dismantling of government agencies
entrusted with alleviating poverty and coping with
disasters, and the ceaseless nostrums about the "free
market" magically resolving the problems of modern
society have been exposed before millions.
With at least 100,000 people trapped in a city without
power, water or food and threatened with the spread
of disease and death, the government has proven incapable
of establishing the most elementary framework of logistical
organization. It has failed to even evacuate the critically
ill from public hospitals, much less provide basic
medical assistance to the many thousands placed in
harm's way by the disaster.
What was the government's response to the natural
catastrophe that threatened New Orleans? It amounted
to betting that the storm would go the other way,
followed by a policy of "every man for himself."
Residents of the city were told to evacuate, while
the tens of thousands without transportation or too
poor to travel were left to their fate.
Now crowds of thousands of hungry and homeless people
have been reduced to chanting "we need help"
as bodies accumulate in the streets. Washington's
inability to mount and coordinate basic rescue operations
will unquestionably add to a death toll that is already
estimated in the thousands.
The government's callous disregard for the human
suffering, its negligence in failing to prepare for
this disaster and, above all, its utter incompetence
have staggered even the compliant American media.
Patriotic blather about the country coming together
to deal with the crisis combined with efforts to poison
public opinion by vilifying those without food or
water for "looting" have fallen flat in
face of the undeniable and monumental debacle that
constitutes the official response to the disaster.
Reporters sent into the devastated region have been
reduced to tears by the masses of people crying out
for help with no response. Television announcers cannot
help but wonder aloud why the authorities have failed
so miserably to alleviate such massive human suffering.
The presidency, the Congress and both the Republican
and Democratic parties - all have displayed an astounding
lack of concern for the hundreds of thousands of people
whose lives have been shattered and who face the most
daunting and uncertain future, not to mention the
tens of millions more who will be hard hit by the
economic aftershocks of Katrina.
In the figure of the president,
George W. Bush, the incompetence, stupidity, and sheer
inhumanity that characterize so much of America's
money-mad corporate elite find their quintessentially
repulsive expression.
As the hurricane developed over two weeks in the
Caribbean and slowly approached the coast of New Orleans
and Mississippi, Bush amused himself at his ranch
retreat in Crawford, Texas. It is now clear that his
administration made no serious preparations to deal
with the dangers posed by the approaching storm.
In an interview Thursday on the "Good Morning
America" television program, Bush reprised his
miserable performance of the previous day, adding
to Wednesday's banalities the declaration that there
would be "zero tolerance" for looters.
The president blanched when ABC
interviewer Dianne Sawyer asked about a suggestion
that the major oil companies be forced to cede a share
of the immense windfall profits they have reaped from
rising prices over the past six months to fund disaster
relief. He responded by counseling the American people
to "send cash" to charitable organizations.
In other words, there will be no
serious financial commitment from the government to
save lives, care for the sick and needy, and help
the displaced and bereft restore their lives. Nor
will there be any national, centrally financed and
organized program to rebuild one of the country's
most important cities - a city that is uniquely associated
with some of the most critical cultural achievements
in music and the arts of the American people.
Above all, the suffering of millions
will not be allowed to impinge on the profit interests
of a tiny elite of multi-millionaires whose interests
the government defends.
Later in the day, Bush described the aftermath of
the flood as a "temporary disturbance."
The ruthless attitude of those in power toward the
average poor and working class residents of New Orleans
was summed up Thursday by Republican House Speaker
Dennis Hastert, who declared "it doesn't make
sense" to spend tax dollars to rebuild New Orleans.
"It looks like a lot of that place could be bulldozed,"
he said.
While Hastert was forced to backtrack from these
chilling remarks, they have a definite political logic.
To rebuild the lives that have been ravaged by Hurricane
Katrina would require mounting a massive government
effort that would run counter to the entire thrust
of a national policy based upon privatization and
the transfer of wealth to the rich that has for decades
been pursued by both major parties.
Can anyone truly believe that the
current administration and its Democratic accomplices
in Congress are going to launch a serious program
to construct low-cost housing, rebuild schools and
provide jobs for the hundreds of thousands left unemployed
by the destruction?
Congress has been virtually silent on the catastrophe
in the south. It has nothing to say, having voted
to support Bush's extreme right-wing agenda of massive
tax cuts for the rich, huge outlays for war in Iraq
and Afghanistan and an ever-expanding Pentagon budget,
and billions to finance the Homeland Security Department.
The millionaires club in the Capitol is well aware
that it voted to slash funding for elementary infrastructure
needs - including urgently recommended improvements
in outmoded and inadequate Gulf Coast anti-hurricane
and anti-flood systems.
The Democratic Party has, as always, offered no opposition.
Indeed, the president was gratified to be able to
announce that former Democratic president Bill Clinton
would resume his road show with the president's father,
the former Republican president, touring the stricken
regions and drumming up support for charitable donations.
In this way the Democratic Party has signaled its
solidarity with the White House and the Republican
policy against any serious federal financial commitment
to help the victims and rebuild the devastated regions.
The decisive components of the present
tragedy are social and political, not natural. The
American ruling elite has for the past three decades
been dismantling whatever forms of government regulation
and social welfare had been instituted in the preceding
period. The present catastrophe is the terrible product
of this social and political retrogression.
The lessons derived from past natural
and economic calamities - from the deadly floods of
the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, to the
dust bowl and Depression of the 1930s - have been
repudiated and derided by a ruling elite driven by
the crisis of its profit system to subordinate ever
more ruthlessly all social concerns to the extraction
of profit and accumulation of personal wealth.
Franklin Roosevelt - an astute and relatively far-sighted
representative of his class - had to drag the American
ruling elite as a whole kicking and screaming behind
a program of social reforms whose basic purpose was
to save the capitalist system from the threat of social
revolution. Even during his presidency, the large-scale
projects in government-funded and controlled social
development, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority,
never became a model for broader measures to alleviate
poverty and social inequality. The contradictions
and requirements of an economic system based on private
ownership of the means of production and production
for profit resulted in any further projects being
shelved.
From the 1970s onward, as the crisis of American
capitalism has deepened, the US ruling elite has attacked
the entire concept of social reform and dismantled
the previously established restrictions on corporate
activities.
The result has been a non-stop process
of social plunder, producing an unprecedented concentration
of wealth at the apex of society and a level of social
inequality exceeding that which prevailed in the days
of the Robber Barons.
Fraud, the worst forms of speculation and criminality
have become pervasive within the upper echelons of
American society. This is the underlying reality that
has suddenly revealed itself, precipitated by a hurricane,
in the form of a collapse of the most elementary forms
of social life.
The political establishment and the corporate elite
have been exposed as bankrupt, together with their
ceaseless insistence that the unfettered development
of capitalism is the solution to all of society's
problems.
The catastrophe unleashed by Katrina has unmistakably
revealed that America is two countries, one for the
wealthy and privileged and another in which the vast
majority of working people stand on the edge of a
social precipice.
All of the claims that the war on
Iraq, the "global war on terrorism" and
the supposed concern for "homeland security"
are aimed at protecting the American people stand
revealed as lies. The utter failure to protect the
residents of New Orleans exposes all of these claims
as propaganda designed to mask the criminality of
the American ruling elite and the diversion of resources
away from the most essential needs of the people.
Here's Cynthia
Bogard on why so many people "chose" to
remain behind and not evacuate the city before the hurricane
hit:
With a horrible decisiveness, Hurricane Katrina has
sheared off the front of the American doll house,
leaving our decimated national infrastructure for
all the world to see. It's not a pretty sight, especially
given the current administration's propensity to bluster
about America as "the greatest nation on earth"
and the "world's superpower."
The consequences of a generation of looting the funding
for public works projects, anti-poverty programs,
and local and national administrative capacity coupled
with rollbacks of federal energy and environmental
regulation have been revealed in all their stark reality
by this epic storm. Relentless Republican-led but
Democratic Leadership Council-supported attacks on
"big government" (by which they meant programs
of no immediate use to global corporations) in the
past two decades have been remarkably successful.
"The era of big government," as DLC poster
boy Bill Clinton famously declared in the mid 1990s,
"is over."
He was talking about what other wealthy democratic
nations refer to as their "welfare state"--that
constellation of tax-financed regulations and services
that provide citizen security on "quality of
life" issues such as housing, education, healthcare,
safety, a healthy environment and economic stability
in times of unemployment. Included also in other nation's
welfare states is public infrastructure that can be
counted on in such areas as transportation, communication,
electricity, and clean water. In other wealthy democracies,
that's what government is largely for; these are the
kinds of citizen protections those living in poor
nations dream about.
Now that Katrina's come to town, it's become all
too apparent how far down the road to the wholesale
giveaway of America's collective wealth to its wealthy
we have traveled. And the consequences of purposely
destroying our modest welfare state have become devastatingly
clear--well, at least to some.
A few days ago, Louisiana Governor Kathleen Babineaux
Blanco ordered the evacuation of New Orleans, an event
which proceeded, according to many accounts, in a
remarkably orderly fashion. As it turned out, however,
about 20% of residents did not "choose"
to leave town--a fact that the governor publicly grumbled
about after the levees were compromised, the city
inundated and those "left behind" put at
risk for their lives in the floodwaters and sweltering
heat.
One observant commentator noted that the evacuation
was indeed very efficiently run "if you had a
car." Those left behind were drawn disproportionately
from the 30% of the city's residents who are chronically
poor. They had no cars, Governor.
An astute downtown New Orleans attorney interviewed
on National Public Radio noted from the safety of
a friend's house a safe distance from town that Katrina
had happened at the end of the month, "when many
of the poor have run out of funds." Put these
facts of no cars and no cash together with some typical
coping strategies for surviving chronic poverty and
gaping holes in public services and infrastructure
and it becomes all too clear why many impoverished
and disproportionately Black citizens of New Orleans
didn't "choose" to evacuate.
It's harrowing enough to leave town in one's reliable
vehicle armed with luggage, credit cards and cash,
bound for some well-heeled friend or relative who
lives at a higher elevation. It's quite another thing
to leave with no cash, no car, no credit and no out
of town relatives with room to spare. Poor people
without employment typically depend on very local
resources for their survival, especially when money
and food stamps run out. Even in the most generous
northern states, public assistance checks usually
run out in the middle of the third week of the month
no matter how good at budgeting a mother may be. The
last ten days of the month are spent trading what
resources you have for what you need, calling on those
who owe you a favor, asking for leniency in paying
for necessities and pawning the few worthy possessions
you own. And waiting for the check.
All of these coping strategies require that poor
people remain in close proximity to those on whom
they must depend for survival. Katrina caught New
Orleans' poor just in the most desperate phase of
this depressing monthly struggle for survival. As
someone who has spent a dozen years listening to the
stories of people who have become homeless in less
dramatic fashion than the citizens of New Orleans
just did, it was no surprise to me that the poor mostly
remained home or made their way to the local shelter--the
Superdome. Where was the government before the levees
broke with buses and trains, assurances about shelters
far away, food and cash vouchers for necessities?
For many poor people the risk of leaving far outweighed
the risk of staying--at least until the levees broke
and water poured into their neighborhoods. And by
then it was too late.
I've seen footage of people huddled on their rooftops,
waving sheets and homemade "help us" posters.
I saw hundreds, elderly folks and babies included,
left to bake in the ninety degree sun on an unprotected
overpass. Where was the evacuation plan and resources
to help those who couldn't help themselves?
Some of these people will die. Indeed, some already
have, from nothing more than the neglect made more
likely because the emergency services infrastructure
in many local communities never existed in the first
place or has been scaled back due to falling tax revenues
and "no big government" attitudes.
The last line of protection in disasters such as
this is the National Guard. Only two thirds of these
public servants were in the local area and available
for deployment. The rest are in Iraq. The communities
hit by Katrina, especially the larger, more urban,
more impoverished communities simply lacked adequate
numbers of trained and ready personnel and equipment
to do the job.
In the past few years, an increasingly bold Congress
has made matters even worse. Funding for the crucial
public works project that could have prevented the
loss of New Orleans--the improvement of the levee
system--was drastically cut. Wetlands, a natural barrier
to storm surges that once characterized the Mississippi
Delta, have been given over to developers to fill
in and build on. Global warming deniers have also
muffled any national conversation about how we should
live differently now that dramatic weather events
will become more common. In
perhaps the most callous example of what occurs when
government becomes the tool of capitalism rather than
the servant of the citizens, New Orleans Mayor Ray
Nagin now has ordered the police force to abandon
their search and rescue mission in favor of halting
looters. In other words, police officers are being
told they're in the business of protecting property
instead of people.
In a disaster of these proportions, there's always
the tendency to look for someone to blame. This time
we're all to blame, for allowing our collective system
of protection, our government, to be hijacked by corporate
interests and their politician lackeys. Katrina will
take the lives of many. Some of those deaths "big
government" could have saved.
Many are arguing that the neglect of public services
and infrastructure was deliberate, that the right-wing
power structure in the United States wanted to make
the public feel abandoned.
A
Can't-Do Government
Paul Krugman
September 2, 2005
Before 9/11 the Federal Emergency Management Agency
listed the three most likely catastrophic disasters
facing America: a terrorist attack on New York, a
major earthquake in San Francisco and a hurricane
strike on New Orleans. "The New Orleans hurricane
scenario," The Houston Chronicle wrote in December
2001, "may be the deadliest of all." It
described a potential catastrophe very much like the
one now happening.
So why were New Orleans and the nation so unprepared?
After 9/11, hard questions were deferred in the name
of national unity, then buried under a thick coat
of whitewash. This time, we need accountability.
First question: Why have aid and security taken so
long to arrive? Katrina hit five days ago - and it
was already clear by last Friday that Katrina could
do immense damage along the Gulf Coast. Yet the response
you'd expect from an advanced country never happened.
Thousands of Americans are dead or dying, not because
they refused to evacuate, but because they were too
poor or too sick to get out without help - and help
wasn't provided. Many have yet to receive any help
at all.
There will and should be many questions about the
response of state and local governments; in particular,
couldn't they have done more to help the poor and
sick escape? But the evidence points, above all, to
a stunning lack of both preparation and urgency in
the federal government's response.
Even military resources in the right place weren't
ordered into action. "On Wednesday," said
an editorial in The Sun Herald in Biloxi, Miss., "reporters
listening to horrific stories of death and survival
at the Biloxi Junior High School shelter looked north
across Irish Hill Road and saw Air Force personnel
playing basketball and performing calisthenics. Playing
basketball and performing calisthenics!"
Maybe administration officials believed that the
local National Guard could keep order and deliver
relief. But many members of the National Guard and
much of its equipment - including high-water vehicles
- are in Iraq. "The National Guard needs that
equipment back home to support the homeland security
mission," a Louisiana Guard officer told reporters
several weeks ago.
Second question: Why wasn't more preventive action
taken? After 2003 the Army Corps of Engineers sharply
slowed its flood-control work, including work on sinking
levees. "The corps," an Editor and Publisher
article says, citing a series of articles in The Times-Picayune
in New Orleans, "never tried to hide the fact
that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as
well as homeland security - coming at the same time
as federal tax cuts - was the reason for the strain."
In 2002 the corps' chief resigned, reportedly under
threat of being fired, after he criticized the administration's
proposed cuts in the corps' budget, including flood-control
spending.
Third question: Did the Bush administration destroy
FEMA's effectiveness? The administration has, by all
accounts, treated the emergency management agency
like an unwanted stepchild, leading to a mass exodus
of experienced professionals.
Last year James Lee Witt, who won bipartisan praise
for his leadership of the agency during the Clinton
years, said at a Congressional hearing: "I am
extremely concerned that the ability of our nation
to prepare for and respond to disasters has been sharply
eroded. I hear from emergency managers, local and
state leaders, and first responders nearly every day
that the FEMA they knew and worked well with has now
disappeared."
I don't think this is a simple tale
of incompetence. The reason the military wasn't rushed
in to help along the Gulf Coast is, I believe, the
same reason nothing was done to stop looting after
the fall of Baghdad. Flood control was neglected for
the same reason our troops in Iraq didn't get adequate
armor.
At a fundamental level, I'd argue,
our current leaders just aren't serious about some
of the essential functions of government. They like
waging war, but they don't like providing security,
rescuing those in need or spending on preventive measures.
And they never, ever ask for shared sacrifice.
Yesterday Mr. Bush made an utterly fantastic claim:
that nobody expected the breach of the levees. In
fact, there had been repeated warnings about exactly
that risk.
So America, once famous for its can-do attitude,
now has a can't-do government that makes excuses instead
of doing its job. And while it makes those excuses,
Americans are dying.
Chris Floyd:
Where were the resources - the money, manpower, materiel,
transport - that could have removed all those forced
to stay behind, and given them someplace safe and
sustaining to take shelter? Where, indeed, were the
resources that could have bolstered the city's defenses
and shored up its levees? Where were the National
Guard troops that could have secured the streets and
directed survivors to food and aid? Where were the
public resources - the physical manifestation of the
citizenry's commitment to the common good - that could
have greatly mitigated the brutal effects of this
natural disaster?
"President Coolidge came down here in a
railroad train,
With a little fat man with a notebook in his hand.
The president say, "Little fat man, isn't it
a shame
What the river has done to this poor cracker's land?"
Well, we all know what happened
to those vital resources. They had been cut back,
stripped down, gutted, pilfered - looted - to pay
for a war of aggression, to pay for a tax cut for
the wealthiest, safest, most protected Americans,
to gorge the coffers of a small number of private
and corporate fortunes, while letting the public sector
- the common good - wither and die on the vine.
These were all specific actions of the Bush Administration
- including the devastating budget cuts on projects
specifically designed to bolster New Orleans' defenses
against a catastrophic hurricane. Bush even cut money
for strengthening the very levees that broke and delivered
the deathblow to the city. All this, in the face of
specific warnings of what would happen if these measures
were neglected: the city would go down "under
20 feet of water," one expert predicted just
a few weeks ago.
But Bush said there was no money for this kind of
folderol anymore. The federal budget had been busted
by his tax cuts and his war. And
this was a deliberate policy: as Bush's mentor Grover
Norquist famously put it, the whole Bushist ethos
was to starve the federal government of funds, shrinking
it down so "we can drown it in the bathtub."
As it turned out, the bathtub wasn't quite big enough
-- so they drowned it in the streets of New Orleans
instead.
But as culpable, criminal and loathsome
as the Bush Administration is, it is only the apotheosis
of an overarching trend in American society that has
been gathering force for decades: the destruction
of the idea of a common good, a public sector whose
benefits and responsibilities are shared by all, and
directed by the consent of the governed. For more
than 30 years, the corporate Right has waged a relentless
and highly focused campaign against the common good,
seeking to atomize individuals into isolated "consumer
units" whose political energies - kept deliberately
underinformed by the ubiquitous corporate media -
can be diverted into emotionalized "hot button"
issues (gay marriage, school prayer, intelligent design,
flag burning, welfare queens, drugs, porn, abortion,
teen sex, commie subversion, terrorist threats, etc.,
etc.) that never threaten Big Money's bottom line.
Again deliberately, with smear, spin and sham, they
have sought - and succeeded - in poisoning the well
of the democratic process, turning it into a tabloid
melee where only "character counts" while
the rapacious policies of Big Money's bought-and-sold
candidates are completely ignored. As Big Money solidified
its ascendancy over government, pouring billions -
over and under the table - into campaign coffers,
politicians could ignore larger and larger swathes
of the people. If you can't hook yourself up to a
well-funded, coffer-filling interest group, if you
can't hire a big-time Beltway player to lobby your
cause and get you "a seat at the table,"
then your voice goes unheard, your concerns are shunted
aside. (Apart from a few cynical gestures around election-time,
of course.) The poor, the sick, the weak, the vulnerable
have become invisible - in the media, in the corporate
boardroom, "at the table" of the power players
in national, state and local governments. The increasingly
marginalized and unstable middle class is also fading
from the consciousness of the rulers, whose servicing
of the elite goes more brazen and frantic all the
time.
When unbridled commercial development
of delicately balanced environments like the Mississippi
Delta is bruited "at the table," whose voice
is heard? Not the poor, who, as we have seen this
week, will overwhelmingly bear the brunt of the overstressed
environment. And not the middle class, who might opt
for the security of safer, saner development policies
to protect their hard-won homes and businesses. No,
the only voice that matters is that of the developers
themselves, and the elite investors who stand behind
them.
The only hope is that the United States may be able
finally to face reality – but I would not bet
on it.
|
WASHINGTON, Sept. 3 - Faced with
one of the worst political crises of his administration,
President Bush abruptly overhauled his September schedule
on Saturday as the White House scrambled to gain control
of a situation that Republicans said threatened to undermine
Mr. Bush's second-term agenda and the party's long-term
ambitions.
In a sign of the mounting anxiety
at the White House, Mr. Bush made a rare Saturday appearance
in the Rose Garden before live television cameras to
announce that he was dispatching additional active-duty
troops to the Gulf Coast. He
struck a more somber tone than he had at times on Friday
during a daylong tour of the disaster region, when he
had joked at the airport in New Orleans about the fun
he had had in his younger days in Houston. His
demeanor on Saturday was similar to that of his most
somber speeches after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"The magnitude of responding to a crisis over
a disaster area that is larger than the size of Great
Britain has created tremendous problems that have strained
state and local capabilities," said Mr. Bush, slightly
exaggerating the stricken land area. "The result
is that many of our citizens simply are not getting
the help they need, especially in New Orleans. And that
is unacceptable."
The president was flanked by his high military and
emergency command: Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld,
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Gen.
Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
As Mr. Bush spoke, Vice President Dick Cheney and Karl
Rove, the president's senior political adviser, listened
on the sidelines, as did Dan Bartlett, the counselor
to the president and Mr. Bush's overseer of communications
strategy. Their presence underscored
how seriously the White House is reacting to the political
crisis it faces.
"Where our response is not working, we'll make
it right," Mr. Bush said, as Mr. Bartlett, with
a script in his hand, followed closely.
His speech came as analysts and some Republicans warned
that the White House's response to the crisis in New
Orleans, which has been widely seen as slow and ineffectual,
could further undermine Mr. Bush's authority at a time
when he was already under fire, endangering his Congressional
agenda.
Mr. Chertoff said Saturday: "Not an hour goes
by that we do not spend a lot of time thinking about
the people who are actively suffering. The United States,
as the president has said, is going to move heaven and
earth to rescue, feed, shelter" victims of the
storm.
The White House said Mr. Bush would return to Louisiana
and Mississippi on Monday, scrapping his plans for a
Labor Day address in Maryland. The rest of Mr. Bush's
schedule next week was in flux.
The White House also postponed a major visit to Washington
next week by President Hu Jintao of China. In a statement
issued on Saturday, the White House said both Mr. Hu
and Mr. Bush had agreed that "in the present circumstances,
it was best not to have" the meeting, which would
have demanded much of the president's attention over
the next days on growing difficulties between the United
States and China over trade frictions, North Korea's
nuclear program and China's military buildup.
The last-minute overhaul of the president's plans reflected
what analysts and some Republicans said was a long-term
threat to Mr. Bush's presidency created by the perception
that the White House had failed to respond to the crisis.
Several said the political fallout over the hurricane
could complicate a second-term agenda that includes
major changes to Social Security, the tax code and the
immigration system.
"This is very much going to divert the agenda,"
said Tom Rath, a New Hampshire Republican with ties
to the White House. "Some of this is momentary.
I think the Bush capital will be rapidly replenished
if they begin to respond here."
Donald P. Green, a professor of political
science at Yale University, said: "The possibility
for very serious damage to the administration exists.
The unmistakable conclusion one would draw from this
was this was a massive administration failure."
And Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker, urged
Mr. Bush to quickly propose a rebuilding plan for New
Orleans and the rest of the Gulf Coast, arguing that
an ambitious gesture could restore his power in Congress.
[...]
The silence of many prominent Democrats
reflects their conclusion that the president is on treacherous
political ground and that attacking him would permit
the White House to dismiss the criticism as partisan
politics-as-usual, a senior Democratic aide said.
Scott McClellan, the White House press secretary, disputed
the notion that Mr. Bush's long-term political viability
was endangered and said Saturday that he was confident
the administration would be able to push ahead successfully
with its second-term agenda. "There are a number
of priorities, and we will address all of them,"
he said.
For all the enormity of the destruction and the lingering
uncertainty about how many years it will take to "rebuild
the great city of New Orleans," as Mr. Bush said
in his remarks on Saturday, some
Republicans suggested that the impact could prove fleeting
in this age of fast-moving events, and that Mr.
Bush's visit to the region on Friday had helped some
in addressing concerns about his response.
"Next Tuesday the Roberts
hearings start, and that's going to occupy a significant
part of the daily coverage," said Richard
N. Bond, a former Republican chairman, referring to
the Supreme Court confirmation hearings of Judge John
G. Roberts Jr. [...]
But Mr. Bush, reflecting concern within the White House
about the president's standing among blacks, notably
said in his radio address that "we have a responsibility
to our brothers and sisters all along the Gulf Coast,
and we will not rest until we get this right and the
job is done."
Both Republicans and Democrats noted
that the reaction to the crisis has been nothing like
what happened after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,
2001, when both parties joined in a bipartisan show
of unity in the face of a clear and identifiable outside
threat.
Hurricane Katrina struck at a time, they said, when
Mr. Bush was already in a weakened state, with his approval
rating in many national polls at the lowest level of
his presidency and his political capital in Washington
diminishing. [...]
|
WASHINGTON - President George W.
Bush promised to quickly nominate a successor to Supreme
Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist, whose death has
given the president a chance to put a conservative stamp
on the court for decades to come.
Rehnquist, who had been chief justice for 19 years
and presided over cases ranging from the impeachment
of President Bill Clinton to Bush's controversial election
win, died on Saturday night from thyroid cancer at his
home in the Washington suburbs, the Supreme Court said
in a statement.
The 80-year-old was diagnosed with cancer in October
but despite several hospital stays had carried on working
on court papers up to the final days before his death,
officials said.
Bush, who now has two vacancies
on the Supreme Court, which has a huge influence
on US society through its decisions, paid tribute to
Rehnquist who had been at the centre of the conservative
camp within the nine justices. [...]
Rehnquist's death follows the announcement by justice
Sandra Day O'Connor in July that she would retire. Bush
has already nominated John Roberts, a conservative federal
appeals court judge, to take her place.
"There are now two vacancies
on the Supreme Court. And it will serve the best interests
of the nation to fill those vacancies promptly,"
Bush said.
"I will choose, in a timely manner,
a highly-qualified nominee to succeed chief justice
Rehnquist."
Rehnquist had been on the court for 33 years in all.
His death, along with O'Connor's retirement, broaden
the political fight over the makeup of the Supreme Court.
Confirmation hearings for John Roberts, a conservative,
were to start on Tuesday. Democrats had been expected
to closely question Roberts, who was once a clerk to
Rehnquist, but some senators said the process should
be delayed out of respect for the chief justice.
Roberts is expected to face a tough questioning on
his positions on issues ranging from abortion to the
role of government.
The most mentioned name to become chief
justice is
Antonin Scalia, a pillar of the Supreme Court's conservative
faction. Appeals court Judge Michael Luttig or Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales are seen as candidates to take
Scalia's place.
Sensing a sea change ahead, National Organization for
Women President Kim Gandy said that Rehnquist's
death gives Bush an opportunity to "not only upset
the delicate balance on this Supreme Court, but also
extend his right-wing ideology and disregard for individual
rights to the third branch of government -- the judiciary."
[...]
In 1999, he presided over the impeachment trial --
and acquittal -- of President Bill Clinton in the Senate
over charges of perjury and obstruction of justice stemming
from his affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
A year later, Rehnquist and
four other Republican-nominated justices, ordered the
end of a presidential election ballot recount in Florida,
giving the presidency to Bush.
Born October 1, 1924, William Hubbs Rehnquist grew
up in Shorewood, Wisconsin, and got his law degree from
Stanford University in California. |
WASHINGTON - President Bush on
Monday nominated John Roberts to succeed William H.
Rehnquist as chief justice, and called on the Senate
to confirm him before the Supreme Court opens its fall
term on Oct. 3.
The swift move would promote to the Supreme Court's
top job a newcomer who currently is being considered
as one of eight associate justices.
"I am honored and humbled by the confidence the
president has shown in me," Roberts said, standing
alongside Bush in the Oval Office. "I am very much
aware that if I am confirmed I would succeed a man I
deeply respect and admire, a man who has been very kind
to me for 25 years."
"He's a man of integrity and fairness and throughout
his life he's inspired the respect and loyalty of others,"
Bush said. "John Roberts built a record of excellence
and achievement and reputation for goodwill and decency
toward others in his extraordinary career."
The selection of Roberts, who
has drawn little criticism, helps Bush avoid
new political problems when he already is under fire
for the government's sluggish response to Hurricane
Katrina and his approval ratings in the polls are at
the lowest point of his presidency.
The president met with Roberts in the private residence
of the White House for about 35 to 40 minutes on Sunday
evening, then officially offered him the job at 7:15
a.m. Monday when Roberts arrived at the Oval Office.
"This had been something that had been in the
president's thinking for some time - in case the chief
justice retired or that there otherwise was a vacancy,"
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said. "The
president when he met with him, knew he was a natural
born leader. The president knew Judge Roberts had the
qualities to lead the court."
McClellan said the White House is confident
that Roberts can be confirmed by the Senate by Oct.
3.
Getting a new chief justice of Bush's
choosing in place quickly also avoids the scenario of
having liberal Justice John Paul Stevens making the
decisions about whom to assign cases to and making other
decisions that could influence court deliberations.
As the court's senior justice, Stevens would take over
Rehnquist's administrative duties until a new chief
is confirmed.
"The passing of Chief Justice William Rehnquist
leaves the center chair empty, just four weeks left
before the Supreme Court reconvenes," Bush said.
"It's in the interest of the court and the country
to have a chief justice on the bench on the first full
day of the fall term."
Bush said Roberts has been closely scrutinized since
he was nominated as an associate justice and that Americans
"like what they see. He is a gentleman. He is a
man of integrity and fairness." He said Roberts
has unusual experience, having argued 39 cases as a
lawyer before the Supreme Court. Bush also said Roberts
was a natural leader.
The last time a president chose a
chief justice outside the court was half a century ago,
when Earl Warren was selected by President Dwight D.
Eisenhower.
The move was engineered to have all nine seats on the
high court filled when the court opens its fall term.
The White House is not opposed to a delay in Roberts'
confirmation hearings as long as they vote on the confirmation
before the court session begins.
"We believe they have enough time to move forward
to meet that goal because of all the work that's already
been done and Justice O'Connor had previously indicated
that she was going to stay on the court until her position
was filled," McClellan said.
Bush already had nominated Roberts to fill the seat
of Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who is
retiring. It requires just take a little paper shuffling
to change the nomination for Rehnquist's seat. Bush
still must fill O'Connor's seat but she has promised
to stay on the court until a successor is named. [...]
Liberal groups have expressed
opposition to Roberts because of his conservative writings
as an attorney for the Reagan administration and his
rulings as an appeals court judge. However, it
does not appear that his opponents have enough votes
to block Roberts' confirmation.
That alone might have been impetus
for Bush to rename Roberts for chief justice. Bush,
with low standing in the polls, might not have the political
capital he would need to win a Senate battle over a
conservative ideologue who would draw intense opposition.
Rehnquist, 80 at his death, served on the Supreme Court
for 33 years and was its leader for 19 years. [...] |
Whenever U.S. officials wish to
demonize someone, they inevitably compare him to Adolf
Hitler. The message immediately resonates with people
because everyone knows that Hitler was a brutal dictator.
But how many people know how Hitler actually became
a dictator? My bet is, very few. I'd also bet that more
than a few people would be surprised at how he pulled
it off, especially given that after World War I Germany
had become a democratic republic.
The story of how Hitler became a dictator is set forth
in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, by
William Shirer, on which this article is based.
In the presidential election held on March 13, 1932,
there were four candidates: the incumbent, Field Marshall
Paul von Hindenburg, Hitler, and two minor candidates,
Ernst Thaelmann and Theodore Duesterberg. The results
were:
Hindenburg - 49.6 percent
Hitler - 30.1 percent
Thaelmann - 13.2 percent
Duesterberg - 6.8 percent
At the risk of belaboring the obvious, almost 70 percent
of the German people voted against Hitler, causing his
supporter Joseph Goebbels, who would later become Hitler's
minister of propaganda, to lament in his journal, "We're
beaten; terrible outlook. Party circles badly depressed
and dejected."
Since Hindenberg had not received a majority of the
vote, however, a runoff election had to be held among
the top three vote-getters. On April 19, 1932, the runoff
results were:
Hindenburg - 53.0 percent
Hitler - 36.8 percent
Thaelmann - 10.2 percent
Thus, even though Hitler's vote total
had risen, he still had been decisively rejected by
the German people.
On June 1, 1932, Hindenberg appointed Franz von Papen
as chancellor of Germany, whom Shirer described as an
"unexpected and ludicrous figure." Papen immediately
dissolved the Reichstag (the national congress) and
called for new elections, the third legislative election
in five months.
Hitler and his fellow members of the National Socialist
(Nazi) Party, who were determined to bring down the
republic and establish dictatorial rule in Germany,
did everything they could to create chaos in the streets,
including initiating political violence and murder.
The situation got so bad that martial law was proclaimed
in Berlin.
Even though Hitler had badly lost the presidential
election, he was drawing ever-larger crowds during the
congressional election. As Shirer points out,
In one day, July 27, he spoke to 60,000 persons
in Brandenburg, to nearly as many in Potsdam, and
that evening to 120,000 massed in the giant Grunewald
Stadium in Berlin while outside an additional 100,000
heard his voice by loudspeaker.
Hitler's rise to power
The July 31, 1932, election produced a major victory
for Hitler's National Socialist Party. The party won
230 seats in the Reichstag, making it Germany's largest
political party, but it still fell short of a majority
in the 608-member body.
On the basis of that victory, Hitler demanded that
President Hindenburg appoint him chancellor and place
him in complete control of the state. Otto von Meissner,
who worked for Hindenburg, later testified at Nuremberg,
Hindenburg replied that because of the tense situation
he could not in good conscience risk transferring
the power of government to a new party such as the
National Socialists, which did not command a majority
and which was intolerant, noisy and undisciplined.
Political deadlocks in the Reichstag soon brought a
new election, this one in November 6, 1932. In that
election, the Nazis lost two million votes and 34 seats.
Thus, even though the National Socialist Party was still
the largest political party, it had clearly lost ground
among the voters.
Attempting to remedy the chaos and the deadlocks, Hindenburg
fired Papen and appointed an army general named Kurt
von Schleicher as the new German chancellor. Unable
to secure a majority coalition in the Reichstag, however,
Schleicher finally tendered his resignation to Hindenburg,
57 days after he had been appointed.
On January 30, 1933, President Hindenburg appointed
Adolf Hitler chancellor of Germany. Although
the National Socialists never captured more than 37
percent of the national vote, and even though they still
held a minority of cabinet posts and fewer than 50 percent
of the seats in the Reichstag, Hitler and the Nazis
set out to to consolidate their power. With Hitler
as chancellor, that proved to be a fairly easy task.
The Reichstag fire
On February 27, Hitler was enjoying supper at the Goebbels
home when the telephone rang with an emergency message:
"The Reichstag is on fire!" Hitler and Goebbels
rushed to the fire, where they encountered Hermann Goering,
who would later become Hitler's air minister. Goering
was shouting at the top of his lungs,
This is the beginning of the Communist revolution!
We must not wait a minute. We will show no mercy.
Every Communist official must be shot, where he is
found. Every Communist deputy must this very day be
strung up.
The day after the fire, the Prussian government announced
that it had found communist publications stating,
Government buildings, museums, mansions and essential
plants were to be burned down... . Women and children
were to be sent in front of terrorist
groups.... The burning of the Reichstag was
to be the signal for a bloody insurrection and civil
war.... It has been ascertained that today was to
have seen throughout Germany terrorist
acts against individual persons, against private property,
and against the life and limb of the peaceful population,
and also the beginning of general civil war.
So how was Goering so certain that
the fire had been set by communist terrorists? Arrested
on the spot was a Dutch communist named Marinus van
der Lubbe. Most historians now believe that van der
Lubbe was actually duped by the Nazis into setting the
fire and probably was even assisted by them, without
his realizing it.
Why would Hitler and his associates turn a blind eye
to an impending terrorist attack on their national congressional
building or actually assist with such a horrific deed?
Because they knew what government
officials have known throughout history - that during
extreme national emergencies, people are most scared
and thus much more willing to surrender their liberties
in return for "security." And that's
exactly what happened during the Reichstag terrorist
crisis.
Suspending civil liberties
The day after the fire, Hitler persuaded President
Hindenburg to issue a decree entitled, "For the
Protection of the People and the State." Justified
as a "defensive measure against Communist acts
of violence endangering the state," the decree
suspended the constitutional guarantees pertaining to
civil liberties:
Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of
free expression of opinion, including freedom of the
press; on the rights of assembly and association;
and violations of the privacy
of postal, telegraphic and telephonic communications;
and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations
as well as restrictions on property, are also permissible
beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.
Two weeks after the Reichstag fire, Hitler requested
the Reichstag to temporarily delegate its powers to
him so that he could adequately deal with the crisis.
Denouncing opponents to his request, Hitler shouted,
"Germany will be free, but not through you!"
When the vote was taken, the result was 441 for and
84 against, giving Hitler the two-thirds majority he
needed to suspend the German constitution. On March
23, 1933, what has gone down in German history as the
"Enabling Act" made Hitler dictator of Germany,
freed of all legislative and constitutional constraints.
The judiciary under Hitler
One of the most dramatic consequences was in the judicial
arena. Shirer points out,
Under the Weimar Constitution judges were independent,
subject only to the law, protected from arbitrary
removal and bound at least in theory by Article 109
to safeguard equality before the law.
In fact, in the Reichstag terrorist case, while the
court convicted van der Lubbe of the crime (who was
executed), three other defendants, all communists, were
acquitted, which infuriated Hitler and Goering. Within
a month, the Nazis had transferred jurisdiction over
treason cases from the Supreme Court to a new People's
Court, which, as Shirer points out,
soon became the most dreaded tribunal in the land.
It consisted of two professional
judges and five others chosen from among party officials,
the S.S. and the armed forces, thus giving the latter
a majority vote. There
was no appeal from its decisions or sentences
and usually its sessions were held in camera. Occasionally,
however, for propaganda purposes when relatively light
sentences were to be given, the foreign correspondents
were invited to attend.
One of the Reichstag terrorist defendants, who had
angered Goering during the trial with a severe cross-examination
of Goering, did not benefit from his acquittal. Shirer
explains:
The German communist leader was immediately taken
into "protective custody," where he remained
until his death during the second war.
In addition to the People's
Court, which handled treason cases, the Nazis also set
up the Special Court, which handled cases of political
crimes or "insidious attacks against the government."
These courts
consisted of three judges, who invariably had to
be trusted party members, without a jury. A Nazi prosecutor
had the choice of bringing action in such cases before
either an ordinary court or the Special Court, and
invariably he chose the latter, for obvious reasons.
Defense lawyers before this court, as before the Volksgerichtshof,
had to be approved by Nazi officials. Sometimes even
if they were approved they fared badly. Thus the
lawyers who attempted to represent the widow of Dr.
Klausener, the Catholic Action leader murdered in
the Blood Purge, in her suit for damages against the
State were whisked off to Sachsenhausen concentration
camp, where they were kept until they formally withdrew
the action.
Even lenient treatment by the Special Court was no
guarantee for the defendant, however, as Pastor Martin
Niemoeller discovered when he was acquitted of major
political charges and sentenced to time served for minor
charges. Leaving the courtroom, Niemoeller was taken
into custody by the Gestapo and taken to a concentration
camp.
The Nazis also implemented a
legal concept called Schutzhaft or "protective
custody" which enabled them to arrest and incarcerate
people without charging them with a crime. As
Shirer put it,
Protective custody did not protect a man from possible
harm, as it did in more civilized countries. It punished
him by putting him behind barbed wire.
On August 2, 1934, Hindenburg died, and the title of
president was abolished. Hitler's title became Fuehrer
and Reich Chancellor. Not surprisingly, he used the
initial four-year "temporary" grant of emergency
powers that had been given to him by the Enabling Act
to consolidate his omnipotent control over the entire
country.
Accepting the new order
Oddly enough, even though his dictatorship
very quickly became complete, Hitler returned to the
Reichstag every four years to renew the "temporary"
delegation of emergency powers that it had given him
to deal with the Reichstag-arson crisis. Needless to
say, the Reichstag rubber-stamped each of his requests.
For their part, the German people quickly accepted
the new order of things. Keep
in mind that the average non-Jewish German was pretty
much unaffected by the new laws and decrees. As long
as a German citizen kept his head down, worked hard,
took care of his family, sent his children to the public
schools and the Hitler Youth organization, and, most
important, didn't involve himself in political dissent
against the government, a visit by the Gestapo was very
unlikely.
Keep in mind also that, while
the Nazis established concentration camps in the 1930s,
the number of inmates ranged in the thousands. It
wouldn't be until the 1940s that the death camps and
the gas chambers that killed millions would be implemented.
Describing how the average German adapted to
the new order, Shirer writes,
The overwhelming majority of Germans did not seem
to mind that their personal freedom had been taken away,
that so much of culture had been destroyed and replaced
with a mindless barbarism, or that their life and work
had become regimented to a degree never before experienced
even by a people accustomed for generations to a great
deal of regimentation.... The
Nazi terror in the early years affected the lives of
relatively few Germans and a newly arrived observer
was somewhat surprised to see that the people of this
country did not seem to feel that they were being cowed....
On the contrary, they supported it with genuine enthusiasm.
Somehow it imbued them with a
new hope and a new confidence and an astonishing faith
in the future of their country. |
Charities and
the federal government launched what aid agencies predicted
could be the longest and costliest relief effort in
U.S. history, as workers began arriving last night in
states devastated by Hurricane Katrina, and as the U.S.
military organized an intensive response by already
stretched National Guard and active duty forces.
The American Red Cross, working in concert with the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, called its plan
to house and feed tens of thousands of people its biggest
response to a single natural disaster in the organization's
124-year history. With deep flooding that may not recede
for weeks in areas across three states, charities said
thousands could remain homeless for more than a year
and that the rebuilding would probably take even longer.
"This disaster response is going to exceed our
response to last year's back-to-back four hurricanes"
in Florida, said Red Cross spokeswoman Devorah Goldburg.
That effort included serving 16.5 million meals and
providing the equivalent of 430,000 nights of shelter.
"We're anticipating that Katrina will exceed those
numbers."
The needs were as immense as they were varied, ranging
from urgent search-and-rescue requests to pressing demands
for shelter and clean water, and daunting longer-range
challenges that were barely coming into focus last night.
The Air Force, Navy and Army began
mobilizing troops and equipment to augment National
Guard units, including helicopters with night-search
gear and amphibious watercraft with civilian teams for
rescuing stranded citizens. The Navy and U.S. Merchant
Marine readied five ships in Norfolk and Baltimore:
the hospital ship USNS Comfort, as well as helicopter-carrying
vessels and ships that can carry landing craft, construction
equipment, Humvees, forklifts, food, fuel and water-purification
equipment.
'Sheer magnitude'
For the first time, the Pentagon yesterday created
a joint domestic task force -- headed by a three-star
general and based in Mississippi -- to coordinate emergency
operations by Guard and active-duty forces across four
states. Driving the U.S. military response was the realization
of the "sheer magnitude" of the catastrophe
once dawn broke, said Michael Kucharek, spokesman for
U.S. Northern Command in Colorado Springs.
The Red Cross had opened more
than 200 shelters yesterday in concert with FEMA,
which mobilized before the storm
when President Bush designated Louisiana and Mississippi
disaster areas. That allowed FEMA rescue workers to
bring in water, ice and ready-to-eat meals before Katrina
hit.
While rescue units pulled stranded residents from floodwater
yesterday, a 50-member FEMA team was in Louisiana, making
plans to buy, order and move hundreds of thousands of
mobile homes into the area. FEMA will reimburse flood
victims for rental housing, FEMA spokeswoman Natalie
Rule said. The need was made more urgent yesterday when
Louisiana officials decided to evacuate the Superdome,
a city-designated shelter damaged by wind and flooding
and made miserable for its inhabitants by a lack of
electricity and clean water. [...]
Floodwaters 'holding us back'
"We're getting phone calls asking for teams to
rescue people still trapped in their homes," especially
in New Orleans and the Mississippi cities of Biloxi
and Gulfport, said Maj. George Hood, national community
relations secretary for the Salvation Army. The charity
was feeding and housing storm victims on the perimeters
of the disaster. "We have
a team 400 or 500 people in Jackson, Mississippi, [waiting
for] the green light, but it's the floodwaters holding
us back," Hood said. Accurate
information about the disaster area was scarce, "because
nothing is working," he said. [...] |
NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - New Orleans
began the gruesome task of collecting its thousands
of dead on Sunday as the Bush administration tried to
save face after its botched rescue plans left the city
at the mercy of Hurricane Katrina.
Except for rescue workers and scattered groups of people,
streets in the once-vibrant capital of jazz and good
times were all but abandoned after a mass exodus of
hundreds of thousands of refugees into neighboring Texas
and other states.
Battered and sickened survivors made no attempt to
disguise their anger: "We have been abandoned by
our own country, " Aaron Broussard, president of
Jefferson Parish, just south of New Orleans, told NBC's
Meet the Press.
"It's not just Katrina that caused all these deaths
in New Orleans," Broussard said. "Bureaucracy
has committed murder here in the greater New Orleans
area, and bureaucracy has to stand trial before Congress
now."
After a nightmare confluence of natural disaster and
political ineptitude that al Qaeda-linked Web sites
called evidence of the "wrath of God" striking
America, National Guard troops and U.S. marshals patrolled
the city, stricken in the days after the hurricane by
anarchic violence and looting. [...]
President George W. Bush, who in a rare admission of
error, conceded on Friday that the results of his administration's
relief efforts were unacceptable, said on Saturday he
would send 7,200 more active-duty troops over three
days.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld toured a medical
facility at New Orleans' international airport on Sunday.
He spoke and shook hands with
military and rescue officials but walked right by a
dozen refugees lying on stretchers just feet away from
him, most of them extremely sick or handicapped.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was touring the
Mobile, Alabama, area, in her native state.
A further 10,000 National Guard troops were being sent
to storm-hit Louisiana and Mississippi, raising the
total to 40,000. A total of 54,000
military personnel are now committed to relief efforts.
Lawmakers promised to allocate more relief money in
coming weeks after Bush signed a $10.5 billion aid package
for Gulf Coast areas hit by Katrina. [...]
'TWO CATASTROPHES'
Defending the administration's response and disaster
planning, Chertoff said the hurricane and flood in New
Orleans were "two catastrophes" that presented
an unprecedented challenge.
"That perfect storm of combination of catastrophes
exceeded the foresight of the planners and maybe anybody's
foresight," the homeland security chief said.
Critics have said the Federal Emergency
Management Agency has lost its effectiveness since it
became part of the Homeland Security Department in a
post-September 11 reorganization.
Rice was slammed by critics on the
Internet after she attended a New York performance of
the Monty Python musical "Spamalot" on Wednesday,
a day after New Orleans flooded.
After returning to Washington, she defended the administration
against charges the slow government response and prolonged
suffering of New Orleans' predominantly black storm
victims were signs of racial neglect.
"That Americans would somehow
in a color-affected way decide who to help and who not
to help, I just don't believe it," said Rice, the
administration's highest-ranking black official.
The Washington Post reported
on Sunday that Bush administration officials were blaming
state and local authorities for the disaster response
problems. The newspaper
said the administration was rebuffed in an effort to
take control of police and National Guard units reporting
to Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco, a Democrat. |
Defending the U.S. government's
response to Hurricane Katrina, Homeland
Security Secretary Michael Chertoff argued Saturday
that government planners did not predict such a disaster
ever could occur.
But in fact, government officials,
scientists and journalists have warned of such a scenario
for years.
Chertoff, fielding questions from reporters, said government
officials did not expect both a powerful hurricane and
a breach of levees that would flood the city of New
Orleans.
"That 'perfect storm' of a combination
of catastrophes exceeded the foresight of the planners,
and maybe anybody's foresight," Chertoff said.
He called the disaster "breathtaking in its surprise."
But engineers say the levees preventing this below-sea-level
city from being turned into a swamp were built to withstand
only Category 3 hurricanes. And officials have warned
for years that a Category 4 could cause the levees to
fail.
Katrina was a Category 4 hurricane when it struck the
Gulf Coast on September 29.
Last week, Michael Brown, head of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, told CNN his agency
had recently planned for a Category 5 hurricane hitting
New Orleans.
Speaking to "Larry King Live" on August 31,
in the wake of Katrina, Brown said, "That Category
4 hurricane caused the same kind of damage that we anticipated.
So we planned for it two years ago. Last year, we exercised
it. And unfortunately this year, we're implementing
it."
Brown suggested FEMA -- part of the
Department of Homeland Security -- was carrying out
a prepared plan, rather than having to suddenly create
a new one.
Chertoff argued that authorities actually had assumed
that "there would be overflow from the levee, maybe
a small break in the levee. The collapse of a significant
portion of the levee leading to the very fast flooding
of the city was not envisioned."
He added: "There will be plenty of time to go
back and say we should hypothesize evermore apocalyptic
combinations of catastrophes. Be that as it may, I'm
telling you this is what the planners had in front of
them. They were confronted with a second wave that they
did not have built into the plan, but using the tools
they had, we have to move forward and adapt."
But New Orleans, state and federal officials have long
painted a very different picture.
"We certainly understood the potential
impact of a Category 4 or 5 hurricane" on New Orleans,
Lt. General Carl Strock, chief of engineers for the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, said Thursday, Cox News
Service reported.
Reuters reported that in 2004, more than 40 state,
local and volunteer organizations practiced a scenario
in which a massive hurricane struck and levees were
breached, allowing water to flood New Orleans. Under
the simulation, called "Hurricane Pam," the
officials "had to deal with an imaginary storm
that destroyed more than half a million buildings in
New Orleans and forced the evacuation of a million residents,"
the Reuters report said.
In 2002 the New Orleans Times-Picayune ran a five-part
series exploring the vulnerability of the city. The
newspaper, and other news media as well, specifically
addressed the possibility of massive floods drowning
residents, destroying homes and releasing toxic chemicals
throughout the city. (Read: "Times-Picayune"
Special Report: Washing awayexternal link)
Scientists long have discussed this possibility as
a sort of doomsday scenario. [...]
But Chertoff seemed unaware of all the warnings. [...]
Chertoff also argued that authorities did not have
much notice that the storm would be so powerful and
could make a direct hit on New Orleans.
"It wasn't until comparatively
late, shortly before -- a day, maybe a day and a half,
before landfall -- that it became clear that this was
going to be a Category 4 or 5 hurricane headed for the
New Orleans area."
As far back as Friday, August
26, the National Hurricane Center was predicting the
storm could be a Category 4 hurricane at landfall, with
New Orleans directly in its path. Still, storms
do change paths, so the possibility existed that it
might not hit the city.
But the National Weather Service prediction proved
almost perfect. [...] |
The federal official in charge
of the bungled New Orleans rescue was fired from his
last private-sector job overseeing horse shows.
And before joining the Federal Emergency Management
Agency as a deputy director in 2001, GOP activist Mike
Brown had no significant experience that would have
qualified him for the position.
The Oklahoman got the job through an old college friend
who at the time was heading up FEMA.
The agency, run by Brown since 2003, is now at the
center of a growing fury over the handling of the New
Orleans disaster.
"I look at FEMA and I shake my head," said
a furious Gov. Mitt Romney yesterday, calling the response
"an embarrassment."
President Bush, after touring the Big Easy, said he
was "not satisfied" with the emergency response
to Hurricane Katrina's devastation.
And U.S. Rep. Stephen Lynch predicted there would be
hearings on Capitol Hill over the mishandled operation.
Brown - formerly an estates and family lawyer - this
week has has made several shocking public admissions,
including interviews where he suggested FEMA was unaware
of the misery and desperation of refugees stranded at
the New Orleans convention center.
Before joining the Bush administration in 2001, Brown
spent 11 years as the commissioner of judges and stewards
for the International Arabian Horse Association, a breeders'
and horse-show organization based in Colorado.
"We do disciplinary actions,
certification of (show trial) judges. We hold classes
to train people to become judges and stewards. And we
keep records," explained a spokeswoman for the
IAHA commissioner's office. "This was his full-time
job . . . for 11 years," she added.
Brown was forced out of the position
after a spate of lawsuits over alleged supervision failures.
"He was asked to resign,"
Bill Pennington, president of the IAHA at the time,
confirmed last night.
Soon after, Brown was invited to join the administration
by his old Oklahoma college roommate Joseph Allbaugh,
the previous head of FEMA until he quit in 2003 to work
for the president's re-election campaign.
The White House last night defended Brown's appointment.
A spokesman noted Brown served as FEMA deputy director
and general counsel before taking the top job, and that
he has now overseen the response to "more than
164 declared disasters and emergencies," including
last year's record-setting hurricane season. |
Les Evenchick, an independent Green
who lives in the French Quarter of New Orleans in a
3-story walkup, reports that 90 percent of the so-called
looters are simply grabbing water, food, diapers and
medicines, because the federal and state officials have
refused to provide these basic necessities.
Les says that "it's only because of the looters
that non-looters -- old people, sick people, small children
-- are able to survive."
Those people who stole televisions and large non-emergency
items have been selling them, Les reports (having witnessed
several of these "exchanges") so that they
could get enough money together to leave the area.
Think about it:
- People were told to leave, but all the bus stations
had closed down the night before and the personnel
sent packing.
- Many people couldn't afford tickets anyway.
- Many people are stranded, and others are refusing
to leave their homes, pets, etc. They don't have cars.
You want people to stop looting? Provide
the means for them to eat, and to leave the area.
Some tourists in the Monteleone Hotel
paid $25,000 for 10 buses. The buses were sent (I guess
there were many buses available, if you paid the price!)
but the military confiscated them to use not for transporting
people in the Dome but for the military. The tourists
were not allowed to leave. Instead, the military ordered
the tourists to the now-infamous Convention Center.
How simple it would have been for the State and/or
US government to have provided buses for people before
the hurricane hit, and throughout this week. Even evacuating
100,000 people trapped there -- that's 3,000 buses,
less than come into Washington D.C. for some of the
giant antiwar demonstrations there. Even at $2,500 a
pop -- highway robbery -- that would only be a total
of $7.5 million for transporting all of those who did
not have the means to leave.
Instead, look at the human and economic cost of not
doing that!
So why didn't they do that?
On Wednesday a number of Greens tried
to bring a large amount of water to the SuperDome. They
were prevented from doing so, as have many others. Why
have food and water been blocked from reaching tens
of thousands of poor people?
On Thursday, the government used the excuse that there
were some very scattered gunshots (two or three instances
only) -- around 1/50th of the number of gunshots that
occur in New York City on an average day -- to shut
down voluntary rescue operations and to scrounge for
5,000 National Guard troops fully armed, with "shoot
to kill" orders -- at a huge economic cost.
They even refused to allow voluntary workers who had
rescued over 1,000 people in boats over the previous
days to continue on Thursday, using the several gunshots
(and who knows who shot off those rounds?) to say "It's
too dangerous". The volunteers
didn't think the gunshots were dangerous to them and
wanted to continue their rescue operations and had to
be "convinced" at gunpoint to "cease
and desist."
There is something sinister going down
-- it's not just incompetence or negligence.
How could FEMA and Homeland
Security not have something so basic as bottled drinking
water in the SuperDome, which was long a part of the
hurricane plan? One police officer in charge
of his 120-person unit said yesterday that his squad
was provided with only 70 small bottles of water.
Two years ago, New Orleans residents -- the only area
in the entire state that voted in huge numbers against
the candidacy of George Bush -- also fought off attempts
to privatize the drinking water supply. There have also
been major battles to block Shell Oil's attempt to build
a Liquid Natural Gas facility, and to prevent the teardown
of public housing (which failed), with the Mayor lining
up in the latter two issues on the side of the oil companies
and the developers.
One of the first acts of Governor Kathleen Blanco (a
Democrat, by the way) during this crisis was to turn
off the drinking water, to force people to evacuate.
There was no health reason to turn it off, as the water
is drawn into a separate system from the Mississippi
River, not the polluted lake, and purified through self-powered
purification plants separate from the main electric
grid. If necessary, people could have been told to boil
their water -- strangely, the municipal natural gas
used in stoves was still functioning properly as of
Thursday night!
There are thousands of New Orleans residents who are
refusing to evacuate because they don't want to leave
their pets, their homes, or who have no money to do
so nor place to go. The government -- which could have
and should have provided water and food to residents
of New Orleans -- has not done so intentionally to force
people to evacuate by starving them out. This is a crime
of the gravest sort.
We need to understand that the capability
has been there from the start to drive water and food
right up to the convention center, as those roads have
been clear -- it's how the National Guard drove into
the city.
Let me say this again: The government is intentionally
not allowing food or water in.
This is for real.
MSNBC interviewed dozens of people
who had gotten out. Every single one of them was white.
The people who are poor (primarily Black but many poor
Whites as well) are finally being allowed to leave the
horrendous conditions in the SuperDome; many are being
bussed to the AstroDome in Houston.
Call them "People of the Dome."
If people resist the National Guard coming to remove
them against their will, will New Orleans become known
as the first battle in the new American revolution?
Mitchel Cohen is co-editor of "G", the
newspaper of the NY State Greens. He can be reached
at: mitchelcohen@mindspring.com |
NEW ORLEANS - People left homeless
by Hurricane Katrina told horrific stories of rape,
murder and trigger happy guards
in two New Orleans centers that were set up as shelters
but became places of violence and terror.
Police and National Guard troops on Saturday closed
down the two centers -- the Superdome arena and the
city's convention centre -- but then penned them in
outside in sweltering heat to keep them from trying
to walk out of the city.
Military helicopters and buses staged a massive evacuation
to take away thousands of people who waited in orderly
lines in stifling heat outside the flooded convention
centre.
The refugees, who were waiting to be taken to sports
stadiums and other huge shelters across Texas and northern
Louisiana, described how the convention centre and the
Superdome became lawless hellholes beset by rape and
murder.
Several residents of the impromptu
shantytown recounted two horrific incidents where those
charged with keeping people safe had killed them instead.
In one, a young man was run down and then shot by a
New Orleans police officer, in another a man seeking
help was gunned down by a National Guard soldier, witnesses
said.
Police here refused to discuss or confirm either incident.
National Guard spokesman Lt. Col Pete Schneider said
"I have not heard any information of a weapon being
discharged."
"They killed a man here last night,"
Steve Banka, 28, told Reuters. "A young lady was
being raped and stabbed. And the sounds of her screaming
got to this man and so he ran out into the street to
get help from troops, to try to flag down a passing
lorry of them, and he jumped up on the truck's windscreen
and they shot him dead."
Wade Batiste, 48, recounted another tale of horror.
"Last night at 8 p.m. they shot
a kid of just 16. He was just crossing the street. They
ran him over, the New Orleans police did, and then they
got out of the car and shot him in the head," Batiste
said.
The young man's body lay in the street
by the Convention Center's entrance on Saturday morning,
covered in a black blanket, a stream of congealed blood
staining the street around him. Nearby his family sat
in shock.
A member of that family, Africa
Brumfield, 32, confirmed the incident but declined
to be quoted about it, saying her family did not wish
to discuss it. But she spoke of general conditions here.
"There is rapes going on here. Women cannot go
to the bathroom without men. They are raping them and
slitting their throats. They keep telling us the buses
are coming but they never leave," she said through
tears.
People here
said there were now 22 bodies of adults and children
stored inside the building, but troops guarding
the building refused to confirm that and threatened
to beat reporters seeking access to the makeshift morgue.
People trying to walk out are forced back at gunpoint
- something troops said was for their own safety. "It's
sad, but how far do you think they would get,"
one soldier said.
"They have us living here like animals,"
said Wvonnette Grace-Jordan, here with five children,
the youngest only six weeks old. "We have only
had two meals, we have no medicine and now there are
thousands of people defecating in the streets. This
is wrong. This is the United States of America."
One National Guard soldier who asked
not to be named for fear of punishment from his commanding
officer said of the lack of medical attention at the
centre, "They (the Bush administration) care more
about Iraq and Afghanistan than here."
The Louisiana National Guard soldier said, "We
are doing the best we can with the resources we have,
but almost all of our guys are in Iraq."
Across town at the Superdome, where as many as 38,000
refugees camped out until Wednesday night when evacuation
buses first came, the 4,000 still there were corralled
outside, hoping to get on four waiting buses with seats
for only 200.
The scene at the sports stadium was one of abject filth.
Crammed into a small area after the building was shut
to them last night, those remaining sat amid heaps of
garbage, piled in places waist high. The stench of human
waste pervaded the interior of the now vacant stadium.
One police officer told Reuters
there were 100 people in a makeshift morgue at the Superdome,
mostly people who died of heat exhaustion, and
that six babies had been born there since last Saturday,
when people arrived to take shelter.
At the arena, too, there was much talk of bedlam after
dark.
"We found a young girl raped and
killed in the bathroom," one National Guard soldier
told Reuters. "Then the crowd got the man and they
beat him to death." |
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, California
-- Air-raid sirens, Frank Sinatra songs and Muhammad
Ali trash talk blared over the Southern California desert
in a demonstration of new acoustic technology for crowd
control and disaster communications.
In mid-90's morning heat at Edwards Air Force Base,
HPV Technologies and American Technology demonstrated
prototypes of non-lethal sonic devices for a group of
military and law enforcement guests, including representatives
of the U.K. Home Office.
Representatives of both companies
say that within days, they will ship some units of their
respective products to areas hit by Hurricane Katrina,
so authorities can use the tools for crowd control,
aid distribution and rescue operations.
Costa Mesa, California-based HPV showed off three sizes
of its Magnetic Acoustic Device, or MAD, a black square
panel composed of multiple speakers. The units on display
ranged from about 4 to 10 feet across.
The device uses magnets approximately 6 inches tall
and 9.25 inches wide to convert electrical pulses into
sound waves, and is capable of aiming sound precisely
for thousands of feet -- like the sonic equivalent of
a laser, or spotlight.
Its path and reach can be affected by environmental
factors such as nearby flat surfaces, hills, bodies
of water or strong bursts of wind.
A series of test sounds beamed out by MAD, including
gunfire, music and instructional commands, were audible
and intelligible at distances of up to a mile.
When a subject is at close range in
MAD's sonic path, and it is set to high volume, the
sound can be excruciating.
The ability to broadcast instructions or alerts at
great distances with minimal distortion could be useful
for authorities and rescue crews in areas where other
communications systems are unavailable.
American Technology is donating four devices -- three
MRADs (medium-range acoustic devices) and one LRAD (long-range
acoustic device). The four devices
will be shipped out Friday to a Marine military police
unit that is deploying to the Gulf States area for disaster-relief
efforts.
"We are donating the use of one
of our most powerful prototypes, LTPMS-2, for use in
Mississippi as soon as possible, because the governor
of that state said that the biggest problem they have
right now is the fact that they have no communications
infrastructure to get information or instructions out
to people," he said. "They can very easily
put this on a truck and send sound out for a minimum
of at least a mile in either direction."
The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, which hosted
the event as a guest of the Air Force base, is considering
using MAD to replace conventional public address systems
and as a non-lethal "area denial option" --
a way to clear crowds in civil unrest without using
chemical agents, rubber bullets or the like.
"You don't appreciate how powerful this stuff
is until you stand a mile away and can't see the transmitter
-- but can hear every word in a Queen song," said
Cmdr. Sid Heal, who heads the Los Angeles Sheriff's
Department technology exploration program. "At
a quarter mile, it sounds as clear as a car radio; at
a half a mile, you have to raise your voice to talk
to the guy next to you; at three quarters of a mile,
laborers raking up leaves were putting in music requests."
|
NEW ORLEANS - Reeling from the
chaos of this overwhelmed city, at
least 200 New Orleans police officers have walked away
from their jobs and two have committed suicide,
police officials said on Saturday.
Some officers told their superiors they were leaving,
police officials said. Others worked for a while and
then stopped showing up. Still others, for reasons not
always clear, never made it in after the storm.
The absences come during a period of extraordinary
stress for the New Orleans Police Department. For nearly
a week, many of its 1,500 members have had to work around
the clock, trying to cope with flooding, an overwhelming
crush of refugees, looters and occasional snipers.
P. Edwin Compass III, the superintendent of police,
said most of his officers were staying at their posts.
But in an unusual note of sympathy for a top police
official, he said it was understandable that many were
frustrated. He said morale was "not very good."
"If I put you out on the street and made you get
into gun battles all day with no place to urinate and
no place to defecate, I don't think you would be too
happy either," Mr. Compass said in an interview.
"Our vehicles can't get any gas. The water in the
street is contaminated. My officers are walking around
in wet shoes."
Fire Department officials said they did not know of
any firefighters who had quit. But they, too, were sympathetic
to struggling emergency workers.
W. J. Riley, the assistant superintendent of police,
said there were about 1,200 officers on duty on Saturday.
He said the department was not sure how many officers
had decided to abandon their posts and how many simply
could not get to work.
Mr. Riley said some of the officers
who left the force "couldn't handle the pressure"
and were "certainly not the people we need in this
department."
He said, "The others are not here because they
lost a spouse, or their family or their home was destroyed."
Police officials did not identify the
officers who took their lives, one on Saturday and the
other the day before. But they said one had been a patrol
officer, who a senior officer said "was absolutely
outstanding." The other was an aide to Mr. Compass.
The superintendent said his aide had lost his home in
the hurricane and had been unable to find his family.
Because of the hurricane, many police officers and
firefighters have been isolated and unable to report
for duty. Others evacuated their families and have been
unable to get back to New Orleans.
Still, some officers simply appear to have given up.
A Baton Rouge police officer said he had a friend on
the New Orleans force who told him he threw his badge
out a car window in disgust just after fleeing the city
into neighboring Jefferson Parish as the hurricane approached.
The Baton Rouge officer would not give his name, citing
a department policy banning comments to the news media.
The officer said he had also heard of an incident in
which two men in a New Orleans police cruiser were stopped
in Baton Rouge on suspicion of driving a stolen squad
car. The men were, in fact, New Orleans officers who
had ditched their uniforms and were trying to reach
a town in north Louisiana, the officer said.
"They were doing everything to get out of New
Orleans," he said. "They didn't have the resources
to do the job, or a plan, so they left."
The result is an even heavier burden on those who are
patrolling the street, rescuing flood victims and trying
to fight fires with no running water, no electricity,
no reliable telephones.
Police and fire officials have been begging federal
authorities for assistance and criticizing a lack of
federal response for several days.
"We need help," said Charles Parent, the
superintendent of the Fire Department. Mr. Parent again
appealed in an interview on Saturday for replacement
fire trucks and radio equipment from federal authorities.
And Mr. Compass again appealed for more federal help.
"When I have officers committing
suicide," Mr. Compass said, "I think we've
reached a point when I don't know what more it's going
to take to get the attention of those in control of
the response."
The National Guard has come under criticism for not
moving more quickly into New Orleans. Lt. Gen. H Steven
Blum, the head of the National Guard Bureau, told reporters
on Saturday that the Guard had not moved in sooner because
it had not anticipated the collapse of civilian law
enforcement. [...] |
Last September, a Category
5 hurricane battered the small island of Cuba
with 160-mile-per-hour winds. More
than 1.5 million Cubans were evacuated to higher ground
ahead of the storm. Although
the hurricane destroyed 20,000 houses, no one died.
What is Cuban President Fidel Castro's secret? According
to Dr. Nelson Valdes, a sociology professor at the University
of New Mexico, and specialist in Latin America, "the
whole civil defense is embedded in the community to
begin with. People know ahead of time where they are
to go."
"Cuba's leaders go on TV and take charge,"
said Valdes. Contrast this with George W. Bush's reaction
to Hurricane Katrina. The day after Katrina hit the
Gulf Coast, Bush was playing golf. He waited three days
to make a TV appearance and five days before visiting
the disaster site. In a scathing editorial on Thursday,
the New York Times said, "nothing about the president's
demeanor yesterday - which seemed casual to the point
of carelessness - suggested that he understood the depth
of the current crisis."
"Merely sticking people in a
stadium is unthinkable" in Cuba, Valdes said. "Shelters
all have medical personnel, from the neighborhood. They
have family doctors in Cuba, who evacuate together with
the neighborhood, and already know, for example, who
needs insulin."
They also evacuate animals and veterinarians,
TV sets and refrigerators, "so that people aren't
reluctant to leave because people might steal their
stuff," Valdes observed.
After Hurricane Ivan, the United
Nations International Secretariat for Disaster Reduction
cited Cuba as a model for hurricane preparation. ISDR
director Salvano Briceno said, "The Cuban way could
easily be applied to other countries with similar economic
conditions and even in countries with greater resources
that do not manage to protect their population as well
as Cuba does."
Our federal and local governments had more than ample
warning that hurricanes, which are growing in intensity
thanks to global warming, could destroy New Orleans.
Yet, instead of heeding those warnings, Bush set about
to prevent states from controlling global warming, weaken
FEMA, and cut the Army Corps of Engineers' budget for
levee construction in New Orleans by $71.2 million,
a 44 percent reduction.
Bush sent nearly half our National Guard troops and
high-water Humvees to fight in an unnecessary war in
Iraq. Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for
Jefferson Paris in New Orleans, noted a year ago, "It
appears that the money has been moved in the president's
budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq."
An Editor and Publisher article Wednesday said the
Army Corps of Engineers "never tried to hide the
fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq,
as well as homeland security - coming at the same time
as federal tax cuts - was the reason for the strain,"
which caused a slowdown of work on flood control and
sinking levees.
"This storm was much greater than protection we
were authorized to provide," said Alfred C. Naomi,
a senior project manager in the New Orleans district
of the corps.
Unlike in Cuba, where homeland
security means keeping the country secure from deadly
natural disasters as well as foreign invasions, Bush
has failed to keep our people safe. "On
a fundamental level," Paul Krugman wrote in yesterday's
New York Times, "our current leaders just aren't
serious about some of the essential functions of government.
They like waging war, but they don't like providing
security, rescuing those in need or spending on prevention
measures. And they never, ever ask for shared sacrifice."
During the 2004 election campaign, vice presidential
candidate John Edwards spoke of "the two Americas."
It seems unfathomable how people can shoot at rescue
workers. Yet, after the beating of Rodney King aired
on televisions across the country, poor, desperate,
hungry people in Watts took over their neighborhoods,
burning and looting. Their anger, which had seethed
below the surface for so long, erupted. That's what's
happening now in New Orleans. And we, mostly white,
people of privilege, rarely catch a glimpse of this
other America.
"I think a lot of it has to do with race and class,"
said Rev. Calvin O. Butts III, pastor of the Abyssinian
Baptist Church in Harlem. "The people affected
were largely poor people. Poor, black people."
New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin reached a breaking point
Thursday night. "You mean to tell me that a place
where you probably have thousands of people that have
died and thousands more that are dying every day, that
we can't figure out a way to authorize the resources
we need? Come on, man!"
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff had boasted
earlier in the day that FEMA and other federal agencies
have done a "magnificent job" under the circumstances.
But, said, Nagin, "They're feeding the people
a line of bull, and they are spinning and people are
dying. Get off your asses and let's do something!"
When asked about the looting, the mayor said that except
for a few "knuckleheads," it is the result
of desperate people trying to find food and water to
survive.
Nagin blamed the outbreak of violence and crime on
drug addicts who have been cut off from their drug supplies,
wandering the city, "looking to take the edge off
their jones."
When Hurricane Ivan hit Cuba, no curfew
was imposed; yet, no looting or violence took place.
Everyone was in the same boat.
Fidel Castro, who has compared his government's preparations
for Hurricane Ivan to the island's long-standing preparations
for an invasion by the United States, said, "We've
been preparing for this for 45 years."
On Thursday, Cuba's National Assembly sent a message
of solidarity to the victims of Hurricane Katrina. It
says the Cuban people have followed closely the news
of the hurricane damage in Louisiana, Mississippi and
Alabama, and the news has caused pain and sadness. The
message notes that the hardest hit are African-Americans,
Latino workers, and the poor, who still wait to be rescued
and taken to secure places, and who have suffered the
most fatalities and homelessness. The message concludes
by saying that the entire world must feel this tragedy
as its own.
Marjorie Cohn, a contributing editor to t r u t
h o u t, is a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of
Law, executive vice president of the National Lawyers
Guild, and the US representative to the executive committee
of the American Association of Jurists. |
WHITE HOUSE -- President Bush heads
back to America's Gulf Coast today (Monday) for an update
on efforts to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina.
It will be his second visit to the storm-ravaged area
in four days.
This is the Labor Day Holiday in the United States.
But there is no celebration along the Gulf Coast, where
many are focusing on surviving from one day to the next.
Soldiers and supplies have been pouring into the region,
and the chaos that plagued so many communities has begun
to ease.
But a week after the hurricane struck, search and rescue
efforts are continuing, with stranded storm victims
being plucked one by one off rooftops in the hard-hit
city of New Orleans. Hundreds-of-thousands of people
are displaced, and many towns are piles of rubble and
debris. [...] |
NEW ORLEANS - Police shot and killed
at least five people Sunday after gunmen opened fire
on a group of contractors traveling across a bridge
on their way to make repairs, authorities said.
Deputy Police Chief W.J. Riley said police shot at
eight people carrying guns, killing five or six.
Fourteen contractors were traveling
across the Danziger Bridge under police escort when
they came under fire, said John Hall, a spokesman for
the Army Corps of Engineers.
They were on their way to launch barges into Lake Pontchartrain
to help plug the breech in the 17th Street Canal, Hall
said.
None of the contractors was injured,
Mike Rogers, a disaster relief coordinator with the
Army Corps of Engineers, told reporters in Baton Rouge.
The bridge spans a canal connecting Lake Pontchartrain
and the Mississippi River.
No other details were immediately available. |
Associated Press reports that at
least five people shot dead by police as they walked
across a New Orleans bridge yesterday were contractors
working for the US Defence department.
A spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers said the
victims were contractors on their way to repair a canal.
The contractors were on their way across the bridge
to launch barges into Lake Pontchartrain, in an operation
to fix the 17th Street Canal, according to the spokesman.
The shootings took place on the Danziger Bridge, across
a canal connecting Lake Pontchartrain to the Mississippi
River.
Early on Sunday, Deputy Police Chief W.J. Riley of
New Orleans said police shot at eight people, killing
five or six.
No other details were immediately available. |
Oil prices fell Monday after industrialized
nations agreed to release 60 million barrels of crude
from their strategic stockpiles to help avert a severe
fuel shortage in the United States.
The U.S. refinery system was struggling to recover
from Hurricane Katrina. Two storm-shuttered facilities
restarted and flows of crude oil improved enough to
allow refineries in the Gulf Coast and Midwest to ramp
up production. But four damaged
Gulf Coast refiners look likely to remain shut for weeks
or even months, taking with them more than 5 percent
of U.S. capacity.
Still the decision by industrialized nations to alleviate
the hurricane-caused shortfall from their own stocks
appeared to calm the waters. Vienna's PV oil associates
said that by Monday about 30 cargoes of gasoline from
those countries to the United States had been arranged.
On London's International Petroleum Exchange, October
Brent was down $1.21 to $64.85 a barrel by midday in
Europe - close to what it had been fetching before Katrina
hit.
The New York Mercantile Exchange was closed for the
Labor Day holiday. Benchmark light, sweet crude had
closed Friday at $67.57 a barrel, down $1.90 after the
International Energy Agency on Friday announced its
26 members would release 2 million barrels daily for
30 days to meet shortfalls in world energy markets.
The International Energy Agency groups industrialized
nations under the Organization of Economic Cooperation
and Development umbrella. Its members began stockpiling
crude following the oil shocks of the 1970s.
The total release from the IEA includes 30 million
from the United States' own Strategic Petroleum Reserve,
which is near its capacity of around 700 million barrels
stored in salt caverns in Texas and Louisiana - the
state hardest hit by Katrina.
But analysts urged caution, despite
the respite.
"Be wary
of good news. The situation remains horrific and light
will be at the end of a very long tunnel," brokerage
Fimat Inc. said in a research note. [...]
Even before Katrina, markets were on edge because high
demand in the United States and China had whittled back
global excess capacity to just 1.5 million barrels of
the global daily diet of crude, which means there was
little left to offset any unplanned production snag. |
A
moderate earthquake occurred at 23:58:33 (UTC) on Sunday,
September 4, 2005. The magnitude 5.9 event has been
located in the CELEBES SEA. The hypocentral depth was
estimated to be 428 km (266 miles). (This event has
been reviewed by a seismologist.) |
PARIS - Two teenage girls confessed
Monday to starting a fire that killed sixteen people
over the weekend, including three children, and injured
more than 30 in an apartment block fire in a suburb
south of Paris early Sunday -- the third fatal fire
to hit the French capital in nine days.
The blaze broke out at around 1:00am in the hall of
an 18-storey highrise containing 110 local authority
flats at L'Hay-les-Roses near Orly airport. The casualties
-- including 11 who were seriously injured -- were all
caused by smoke inhalation.
According to a final official report on casualties,
11 people were seriously injured. Of those killed, three
were children about 10 years old, officials said. A
young man died died in hospital of severe smoke inhalation
late Sunday. Five people remain in critical condition,
doctors said.
The girls -- one aged 16 and the others 18 -- were
held for questioning on Sunday and admitted setting
light to letter-boxes in the hall of the 18-storey high-rise
in the working-class suburb of L'Hay-les-Roses near
Orly airport, police said.
"They said they did it for fun. They didn't mean
to kill but things got out of control," a police
officer said on condition of anonymity.
Two of the girls live in the high-rise, which contains
some 110 apartments, police said. A third girl was also
being held for questioning.
Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy told French television
that the fire was the result of a "criminal act"
which needed to be "punished as such".
He rejected suggestions by the local mayor that the
blaze was the consequence of an "anti-social act".
Residents told investigators that vandals had been spotted
setting light to letter-boxes on the ground floor of
the highrise. Low-level arson attacks on cars and property
are a regular problem in run-down housing estates that
surround many French cities.
Altogether 39 people have been killed in three fires
in Paris in little over a week, but authorities were
at pains to play down any similarity between the latest
disaster and the fires on August 26 and 29 that killed
24 African immigrants in two dilapidated Paris buildings.
"This is a block of flats. It's got nothing to
do with the fires in the Paris squats," said fire
service spokesman Captain Michel Cros. [...]
Police were working on the theory that one fire, which
killed 17 West Africans near Austerlitz station on August
26, may have been set deliberately, but last Monday's
at a squat in the fashionable Marais district was almost
certainly an accident.
Both of those buildings were run-down condition and
overcrowded, and lacked safety equipment. By contrast
the apartment bloc at L'Hay-les-Roses appeared to have
been properly maintained.
Thousands of protesters marched through
Paris on Saturday demanding urgent investment in low-cost
housing for immigrants, and condemning the forced evacuation
of two Paris squats late last week.
Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy ordered the evictions
as a safety measure, but the Socialist-controlled city
council said no long term alternative accommodation
had been found for the 150 residents, many of whom are
in France illegally.
He told French television he took full responsibility
for the evictions and did not regret them. |
Welcome to the fourth
dimension. And the fifth, and the sixth. A team of astrophysicists
claims to have identified evidence that space is six-dimensional.
Joseph Silk of the University of Oxford, UK, and his
co-workers say that these extra spatial dimensions can
be inferred from the perplexing behaviour of dark matter.
This mysterious stuff cannot be seen, but its presence
in galaxies is betrayed by the gravitational tug that
it exerts on visible stars.
Silk and his colleagues looked at how dark matter behaves
differently in small galaxies and large clusters of
galaxies. In the smaller ones, dark matter seems to
be attracted to itself quite strongly. But in the large
galactic clusters this doesn't seem to be the case:
strongly interacting dark matter should produce cores
of dark material bigger than those that are actually
there, as deduced from the way the cluster spins.
One explanation, they say, is that three extra dimensions,
in addition to the three spatial ones to which we are
accustomed, are altering the effects of gravity over
very short distances of about a nanometre.
The team argues that such astronomical observations
of dark matter provide the first potential evidence
for extra dimensions. Others are supportive, but unconvinced.
Lisa Randall, a Harvard physicist who has explored the
possibility of extra spatial dimensions, says "Even
if their idea works, which it probably does, it may
be an overstatement to use these observations as evidence
of extra dimensions."
Silk himself acknowledges that the proposal is "extremely
speculative".
Too small to see
Physicists have suspected for years
that 'hidden' dimensions exist, largely because they
seem to be predicted by string theory, the current favourite
for a theory of fundamental subatomic particles.
These extra dimensions are generally thought to be
tiny: many billions of times smaller than atoms. This
would make these dimensions very hard to detect, explaining
why the Universe looks as if it has just three. Physicists
such as Randall, however, have proposed that some extra
dimensions might be relatively big, but inaccessible
to us.
The extra dimensions that Silk and colleagues say they
have identified are likewise 'big', at about a nanometre
across. In other words, they say, the Universe is only
about a nanometre wide in these three 'directions'.
They argue that the force of gravity does not obey
Isaac Newton's famous laws over small distances, where
these dimensions come into play. This has never been
tested experimentally: no one has measured how gravity
behaves over distances below about a hundredth of a
millimetre.
Dark stranger
This variation in gravity, says Silk, could be why
dark matter behaves differently in different galactic
environments.
According to one interpretation of the astronomical
observations, dark matter, which is thought to account
for 85% of all the mass in the Universe but not to be
made from the known fundamental particles, seems to
attract itself through some unknown force. And this
attraction seems to be stronger in dwarf galaxies than
in galactic clusters. This is very odd: it is rather
as if apples were to fall faster from single trees than
from trees in an orchard.
But the attraction isn't due to an unknown force, argue
Silk and his colleagues, but to the effect of extra
dimensions on gravity. And because dark matter particles
are accelerated to higher speeds in massive galactic
clusters than in dwarf galaxies, they spend less time
close to each other, so the effects of these extra dimensions
are felt less.
Radical answer
There are other ways of explaining the puzzling dark-matter
distributions, admits Silk's colleague Ue-Li Pen of
the University of Toronto in Canada. For example, one
could assume that the rate at which stars explode, as
supernovae, was quite different in the past.
"Personally, I think changing the supernovae rate
is more conservative than changing the number of spatial
dimensions," Pen confesses. But he thinks that
invoking extra dimensions is such an exciting idea that
it is worth investigating, "even if it is a long
shot".
The most popular versions of string
theory suggest that there are as many as eight extra
dimensions, not just three. But thankfully this needn't
be a problem. There's no reason why, in addition to
the three large extra dimensions predicted by Silk and
colleagues, there might not be several other small ones
too. |
As featured on our
latest podcast page, Relic has written, produced, and
performed a new song called "Signs of the Times".
"Signs of the Times"
words & music by Relic
There are UFOs over Mexico
Hurricanes in Florida
You may be surprised to know
It's raining frogs in Serbia
Tornadoes over Texas
California quakes
The ring of fire is the next to blow
And all of Europe is left to bake
Refrain:
These are the Signs of the Times
The world is burning, yeah
These are the Signs of the Times
The tides are turning, yeah
See the signs
The weather's changed
Everything is strange, somehow
It's all connected
Our leaders lie
Our children die, somehow
It's all connected
Locust plagues and wildfires
Ice age follows climate change
What to do with the avian flu
And HAARP is turned on again
The beast of revelation
Is living in the states
Jesus seen in a grilled cheese
Virgin Mary's on the interstate
Refrain
Butterfly wings
Start so many things, somehow
It's all connected
Gravity waves
Change your DNA, somehow
It's all connected
There's drought in Australia
While China floods
Tsunami wash it all away
Persian rivers run with blood
The sun's dark companion
Comes around again
Auroras in the atmosphere
Meteors falling down like rain
Refrain
So raise your voice
Time to make a choice, somehow
It's all connected
Refrain
Copyright 2005 Relic
Download
MP3 (Right click and "Save link as...")
(6 MB)
Let us know what you think. |
For
the first time, the Signs Team's most popular and discerning
essays have been compiled into book form and thematically
organized.
These books contain hard hitting exposés into
human nature, propaganda, psyop activities and insights
into the world events that shape our future and our
understanding of the world.
The six new books, available now at our bookstore,
are entitled:
- 911 Conspiracy
- The Human Condition
- The Media
- Religion
- The Work
- U.S. Freedom
Read
them today - before the book burning starts! |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|