|
"You get America out of Iraq and
Israel out of Palestine and you'll stop the terrorism."
- Cindy Sheehan
|
P I C T U R E
O F T H E D A Y
Gasconny Fog
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
For
the first time, the Signs Team's most popular and discerning
essays have been compiled into book form and thematically
organized.
These books contain hard hitting exposés into
human nature, propaganda, psyop activities and insights
into the world events that shape our future and our
understanding of the world.
The six new books, available now at our bookstore,
are entitled:
- 911 Conspiracy
- The Human Condition
- The Media
- Religion
- The Work
- U.S. Freedom
Read
them today - before the book burning starts! |
One year ago today, Darren Williams
released the Signs of the Times Production P3nt4gon Str!ke to the world. A year later, the little tyke
has been seen by close to 500 million people. It already
speaks ten languages and will soon be speaking Polish.
To hear more about the animation and what inspired
him to create it, check out our exclusive Signs Podcast
interview
with Darren.
The P3nt4gon Str!ke is the single most successful piece
in bringing the serious questions about the truth of
9/11 to a large public. |
Religious
broadcaster Pat Robertson called on Monday for the assassination
of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, calling him a "terrific
danger" to the United States.
Robertson, founder of the Christian Coalition of America
and a former presidential candidate, said on "The
700 Club" it was the United States' duty to stop
Chavez from making Venezuela a "launching
pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism."
Chavez has emerged as one of the most outspoken critics
of President Bush, accusing the United States of conspiring
to topple his government and possibly backing plots to
assassinate him. U.S. officials have called the accusations
ridiculous.
"You know, I don't know about this
doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying
to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go
ahead and do it," Robertson said. "It's a whole
lot cheaper than starting a war ... and I don't think
any oil shipments will stop."
Electronic pages and a message to a Robertson spokeswoman
were not immediately returned Monday evening.
Venezuela is the fifth largest oil exporter and a major
supplier of oil to the United States. The CIA estimates
that U.S. markets absorb almost 59 percent of Venezuela's
total exports.
Venezuela's government has demanded in the past that
the United States crack down on Cuban and Venezuelan "terrorists"
in Florida who they say are conspiring against Chavez.
Robertson accused the United States of failing to act
when Chavez was briefly overthrown in 2002.
"We have the ability to take him
out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that
ability," Robertson said.
"We don't need another $200 billion
war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator,"
he continued. "It's a whole lot easier to have some
of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over
with." |
WASHINGTON –
Islam is on the move in Mexico and throughout Latin America,
making dramatic gains in converting the native population,
increasing immigration, establishing businesses and charities
and attracting attention from U.S. government officials
who have asked their neighbors to the south to keep an
eye on foreign Muslim groups. [...]
Pentagon officials have confirmed human smuggling rings
in Latin America are attempting to sneak al-Qaida operatives
into the U.S.
In a Defense Department briefing in February 2004 about
National Guardsman Ryan Anderson, suspected of trying
to give al-Qaida information about U.S. capabilities and
weaponry, reporters were also told to expect Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld to provide details on two other subjects:
Guantanamo Bay prisoners freed only to rejoin al-Qaida
and Taliban cells in Afghanistan and al-Qaida's Latin
America connection.
No further announcements were ever forthcoming from the
Pentagon, prompting some sources to wonder whether the
administration was conflicted over this news – given
President Bush's political problems with his illegal immigration
across a porous Mexican border.
Before the U.S.-led coalition attacked Iraq, the U.S.
State Department offered congressional testimony that
both al-Qaida and the Shiite terrorist group Hezbollah
were taking firm hold in "America's backyard."
Mark F. Wong, the State Department's acting coordinator
for counterterrorism, told the House International Relations
Committee about the threat posed by both groups in Latin
America.
Anti-terrorism experts say extremist cells tied to Hezbollah,
Islamic Jihad and al-Qaida network are operating in Argentina,
Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay and Uruguay.
Although cooperation between al-Qaida and Hezbollah has
been known for some time, the two groups have formed a
much closer relationship since al-Qaida was evicted from
its base in Afghanistan.
Both al-Qaida and Hezbollah were active in the common
border area of Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, according to
an earlier statement of Deputy Secretary of State Richard
Armitage in hearings before the Foreign Appropriations
Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, cited
in a report from Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. [...]
Tens of millions of Muslims, mostly of Arabic descent,
live in Latin America.
The terrorists even get some official support in Latin
America, according to sources. As WorldNetDaily reported,
a Venezuelan military defector claims President Hugo Chavez
developed ties to terrorist groups such as al-Qaida –
even providing it with $1 million in cash after Sept.
11, 2001.
Air Force Maj. Juan Diaz Castillo, who was Chavez's pilot,
told WorldNetDaily through an interpreter that "the
American people should awaken and be aware of the enemy
they have just three hours' flight from the United States."
Diaz said he was part of an operation in which Chavez
gave $1 million to al-Qaida for relocation costs, shortly
after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United
States. |
Karl
Rove's War Against Cindy Sheehan
To slander opponents so their political positions are
discredited -- Karl Rove's doctrine has been immensely
effective in defeating Bush's challengers; will it now
be effective in defeating grieving mother Cindy Sheehan? |
By Stewart Nusbaumer
Intervention Magazine |
Dirty
fighting is in their political blood. It’s their
modus operandi. It’s their crème de menthe.
By slandering and lying and thrashing they decimate enemies
and capture political office -- they win, which means
everything to them. Now they are eyeing Cindy Sheehan,
the mother of a soldier tragically killed in Iraq, a grieving
mother protesting the war from a ditch near George Bush’s
ranch. They want to slaughter the mother lamb to destroy
her resonating antiwar message. They want to win again.
Henry Kissinger once joked seriously that “90 percent
of politicians give the other 10 percent a bad reputation.”
Hunter Thompson once said that Richard Nixon, although
this could have been about the 90 percent of politicians,
“could shake your hand and stab you in the back
at the same time.”
But George Bush and Karl Rove are
not just back-stabbers -- they make Richard Nixon look
like an angel. Rove and Bush are unique. Their vulgarity
is wrenching, their lies are outrageous, their maliciousness
is extreme, and their morality is nonexistent.
All of which is evident in their sordid thrashing of three
honorable military veterans.
Campaigns of Sleaze & Malice toward
Three
1) John McCain
In the 2000 presidential primary, shadowy forces spread
rumors that John McCain, who had spent six years in a
North Vietnamese prisoner of war camp, was mentally unfit
to be president. The Bush-Rove attack machine spread stories
of McCain’s out-of-control temper and his so-called
outrageous behavior; they worked up outrageous stories
that McCain had been a stoolie when imprisoned in Vietnam.
Innuendoes circulated and vicious attacks cut, leaving
McCain dazed and fuming. The Bush-Rove team perpetrated
a sleazy e-mail campaign alleging that he had fathered
an illegitimate black daughter, alienating conservatives
in the crucial state of South Carolina.
A former Enron marketing executive,
Karl Rove, discreetly spewed propaganda that crawled
and seeped into the media, his attacks were sneaky and
relentless, vicious, and his lies mean, all intended to
plant in the public’s mind that John McCain’s
mind wobbled unstably and his morals had foundered. The
cumulative effect of the vicious Rove “marketing
campaign,” although impossible to quantify, was
a major contribution in the undermining of John McCain’s
personal and political credibility.
George Bush won the Republican nomination, John McCain
returned to the Senate bitter, and then the Supreme Court
appointed Bush to be president. Rove
obviously learned some great marketing tricks during his
top management tenure at Enron, now the icon for corporate
corruption, if not slime.
What Karl Rove started back in Texas, developed in South
Carolina, refined in Georgia, and perfected nationally
was how to conduct a well coordinated clandestine campaign
to discredit an opponent’s integrity in order to
destroy his candidacy. Attack the person, then their ideas
won’t matter; trash their reputation, then their
policies are dead. That is the way to win elections the
Enron way.
So politics is character assassination,
and everything else is commentary -- or secondary.
And Karl Rove directs these malicious, odious personal
attacks on honorable people to destroy their politics
from behind an iron façade of cowardly secrecy.
The Texas style of politics is sneaky and dastardly.
2) Max Cleland
The next noteworthy battle was
the 2002 Senatorial race in Georgia. The target was the
triple-amputee Vietnam veteran Max Cleland -- a man who
certainly sacrificed for his country. But the vile Bush-Rove
directed propaganda claimed Cleland never sacrificed for
America, giving credibility to the incredulous that his
own grenade ripped his three limbs off -- not true, but
it didn’t matter. The Cleland campaign was
off keel and vulnerable. Again, Rove used the tactics
he learned at Enron, our corporate symbol of deceit and
fraud. [...]
The conventional political wisdom
advised candidates to attack their opponent’s weakest
point; Rove disagreed with this central tactic. He said
go after your opponent’s strongest attribute.
When Vietnam veterans were the opponents, discredit their
military record -- McCain was a stoolie for the communists,
Cleland blew himself up -- then you will discredit their
candidacy. At the same time, Rove was defending his candidate’s
greatest vulnerability, a candidate who insisted he was
tough and a straight talker-- Bush’s military record.
George Bush joined the Air National
Guard to avoid fighting in Vietnam, a war he strongly
supported but refused to fight in. In the Guard, he had
a shabby record that pointed toward drug abuse and even
going AWOL. By immediately lambasting an opponent’s
honorable war record, Karl Rove transferred attention
away from Bush’s miserable military record, and
by continuing to lambaste the honorable veteran, he discredited
the candidate. It defeated John McCain and Max Cleland.
Sure, there were other reasons
for their defeat, but the underlying character assassination
of both candidates was crucial.
A veterans’ honorable military service had always
been above partisan politics and would have never ended
up as campaign fodder; a repugnant public would have given
the offending candidate a crushing election defeat. That
is the way it has always been in America, but not anymore.
Karl Rove and George Bush are different, and they have
been central in making repugnancy mainstream in America.
They have been crucial in moving the ethics of Enron into
the political mainstream.
3) John Kerry
The showcase for Karl Rove’s underhanded prowess
to win through slander and lies was the 2004 presidential
election. On the floor of the Republican Convention, official
delegates held a parade mocking John Kerry’s Purple
Heart decorations -- given for combat wounds in Vietnam.
The “Swift Boat Veterans for Truth” trashed
not only Kerry’s medals but everything related to
his military experience: his motive for going to Vietnam,
his actions in Vietnam, his behavior after the war. He
was accused of being a liar and a fake, an untrustworthy
candidate, even an unpatriotic American. Not merely accused,
but bashed for months up to the election.
Immediately after the Democratic Convention, Kerry was
shoved on the defensive and he never recovered as the
Swift Boat Veterans did the dirty work that benefited
George Bush-- they smeared a veteran with false accusations
and outright lies. The combat vet Kerry was destroyed,
the candidate Kerry was limping. [...]
4) The Media
From John McCain to Max Cleland to John
Kerry, there is a clear pattern that Karl Rove’s
strategy is to smear a candidate’s military service
and his sacrifices for country to create doubt in voters
and to hide the truth that George Bush is the unworthy
candidate. The linchpin for dissimilating Rove’s
smear campaign is the 4th Estate.
Rich Lowry, admirer and friend of Karl Rove, and editor
of the conservative National Review, smugly said that
John McCain, Max Cleland and John Kerry “make the
smallest caucus in American politics -- Thin-Skinned Vietnam
War Veterans Adored by the Media (TSVWVAM).” In
fact, the media does not “adore” these veterans;
in fact, the media made possible the repulsive, historical
thrashing of McCain’s, Cleland’s, and Kerry’s
military careers.
Black has now become white, slander is fact, and disservice
is adornment -- that is the political world of Enron carried
out by unpatriotic Republicans.
But without the compliance of the mainstream
media, there would not be the endless repetition of unsubstantiatedl
charges that grind the truth down, that eventually make
the truth irrelevant in our political campaigns. With
the refusal of the media to investigate and report the
truth, with history and context shunned for flashy outrageous
statements, the bogus took center stage and unsubstantiated
accusations replaced facts. The media is Rove’s
megaphone to slander character and discredit candidates.
Without the media Karl Rove would be ineffective; with
the media he is highly effective.
None -- absolute none -- of the Swift Boat Veterans charges
have ever been substantiated. Not one. Yet, these charges
were crucial in the election defeat of a man running for
the presidency. The role of the media as watchdog of government
and guardian of the truth is an utter sham today. The
media is silly putty in the hands of Rove-type sleaze
balls committed to saying the lie to destroy the credible.
Few American institutions have fallen as far and fast
as the 4th Estate. It makes all the Enron politics possible.
Campaign of Sleaze and Malice toward
Cindy
An angry, yet gentle, broken-hearted mother of a dead
soldier killed in Iraq, Cindy Sheehan protests the war
just down the road from George Bush’s Texas ranch.
She has now returned to California to tend to her ailing
mother, but Cindy remains committed to her cause. She
stands tall as a courageous American, while Americans
watch in fascination. But Karl Rove is not fascinated;
he is looking for his weapons to smear her all the way
to ill repute.
“You don’t need a weatherman to know which
way the wind is blowing,” Bob Dylan sang. And we
don’t need a mind reader to know what Karl Rove
is thinking.
Already there has been a so-called uncoordinated
“citizen outrage” counter-demonstration, just
like Rove organized in Florida during the disastrous vote
recount. Legal action is being discussed to restrict if
not prohibit the mother’s protest -- a rifle shot
was fired -- a truck ran over the sacred crosses of our
war dead. The humid Texas air is thick with tension and
anger. Karl Rove and George Bush are smiling.
There are charges that Cindy is disgracing her dead son’s
legacy “by serving as a pawn for well-organized,
anti-American activist groups … is a willing poster
child for radical left-wing America haters … is
using her son’s death ... is cruelly robbing our
fallen soldiers of the high honor that they deserve …”
-- this in Cindy’s hometown newspaper. The Republican
letters brigades are preparing to roast Cindy in public.
The Republican troops are coming together and the guns
to smear are being prepared. Some activists are under
General Rove’s command, while others are jumping
on the bandwagon propelled by the Bush-Rove attack machine.
The dirty war has started. Last night the Fox News “fair
and balanced” commentators lit into Cindy Sheehan
claiming she is running a circus that is dangerous for
the U.S. soldiers in Iraq. This is a central Rove tactic.
Hide behind the well-being of our troops, even when our
troops are dying; honor the troops while denigrating the
veterans. That is the voice of a moral vacuum without
limits.
There are charges that Cindy receives
finances from left organizations, which supposedly taints
her message. But those in left-wing organizations are
also Americans, and plenty of Americans contribute to
right-wing causes and candidates. Yet, the media carries
the message, allowing the implication to stand, and the
planting in the public’s mind that somehow Cindy
is hiding something awful.
There are rumors that Cindy’s husband is divorcing
her because she was unfaithful, repeatedly unfaithful
the more enthusiastic propagandists claim. Her sexual
orientation is questioned; it’s whispered she’s
a radical lesbian -- she is mentally unbalanced and getting
more unbalanced. Members of her extended family “spontaneously”
line up as Republican sheep, denouncing this whacked out
woman disgracing America and her own dead son. The dirty
war has begun; Enron “reality” is real.
And soon it will happen, the wheels are already turning.
I assure you, a “Soldiers Mothers for Truth”
type organization will claim that Cindy is a miserable
fake and an outlandish liar. It will be the Swift Boating
of Cindy Sheehan. The Rove Doctrine is as predictably
as it is gutter sleazy.
A Campaign for America?
The question is not what Karl Rove and George Bush want
to do about the mother with the potent antiwar message;
they want to discredit her reputation and make her anti-Iraq
War message impotent. But will they succeed? If Cindy’s
personal message -- the Iraq War is wrong so bring the
troops home -- is crushed, then the antiwar movement will
probably slip back into the doldrums, liberals and concerned
citizens will return to their sports and shopping or whatever.
And there will be more war, more dead, more grieving mothers
-- but grieving in private.
To a large extent, what actually happens depends not
on Karl Rove and George Bush, but on us. On students who
have been in a deep coma of indifference. On liberal activists
who have succumbed to inaction because the antiwar movement
is inactive. On sensible citizens who have avoided the
effort to think and act upon their thoughtful decisions.
The outcome of this historical battle depends much more
on whether we change than on what we know the Bush-Rove
attack machine does.
Upon exiting the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin
Franklin was approached by a group of anxious citizens
who asked what kind of government the delegates had created
for the new country. Franklin replied: “A republic,
if you can keep it.”
We can’t keep our democratic republic
if Karl Rove and George Bush define our politics -- bring
down soldiers who sacrificed for America and disrespect
mothers whose sons died in the name of America. We can’t
keep America if we are ruled by the Enron philosophy that
says immoral attacks are patriotic. More than ever, we
need courageous citizens. We need Cindy Sheehan. It’s
time to fight. |
Sometime in late 1980,
then-Col. Paul E. Vallely, the Commander of the 7th Psychological
Operations Group, United States Army Reserve, Presidio
of San Francisco, Ca., co-authored a discussion paper,
which received wide and controversial attention within
the U.S. military, particularly within the Special Operations
community. The paper was titled "From PSYOP to MindWar:
The Psychology of Victory," and it presented a Nietzschean
scheme for waging perpetual psychological warfare against
friend and enemy populations alike, and even against the
American people.
The "MindWar" paper was provoked by an article
by Lt. Col. John Alexander, which appeared in the December
1980 edition of Military Review, advocating the introduction
of ESP (extra-sensory perception), "tele-pathetic
behavior modification," para-psychology, psychokinesis
("mind over matter"), remote viewing, out of
body experiences, and other New Age and occult practices
into U.S. military intelligence. Alexander's paper was
titled "The New Mental Battlefield: Beam Me Up, Spock."
But the subsequent paper co-authored by Vallely went
way beyond ESP and the other paranormal techniques advocated
by Alexander: "Strategic MindWar must begin the moment
war is considered to be inevitable," the document
stated. "It must seek out
the attention of the enemy nation through every available
medium, and it must strike at the nation's potential soldiers
before they put on their uniforms. It is in their homes
and their communities that they are most vulnerable to
MindWar....
"To this end," Vallely and co-author continued,
"MindWar must be strategic in emphasis, with tactical
applications playing a reinforcing, supplementary role.
In its strategic context, MindWar
must reach out to friends, enemies, and neutrals alike
across the globe—neither through primitive
'battlefield' leaflets and loudspeakers of PSYOP nor through
the weak, imprecise, and narrow effort of psychotronics—but
through the media possessed by the United States which
have the capabilities to reach virtually all people on
the face of the Earth. These media are, of course the
electronic media—television and radio. State of
the art developments in satellite communication, video
recording techniques, and laser and optical transmission
of broadcasts make possible a penetration of the minds
of the world such as would have been inconceivable just
a few years ago. Like the sword Excalibur [King Arthur's
magical sword—ed.], we have but to reach out and
seize this tool; and it can transform the world for us
if we have the courage and the integrity to enhance civilization
with it. If we do not accept Excalibur, then we relinquish
our ability to inspire foreign cultures with our morality.
If they can then desire moralities unsatisfactory to us,
we have no choice but to fight them on a more brutish
level.
"MindWar must target all
participants to be effective. It must not only weaken
the enemy; it must strengthen the United States. It strengthens
the United States by denying enemy propaganda access to
our people, and by explaining and emphasizing to our people
the rationale for our national interest in a specific
war."
Leaving nothing
to the imagination, the document concluded by emphasizing
that MindWar should employ subliminal brainwashing technologies,
and weapons that directly attack the targetted population's
central nervous system and brain functioning: "There
are some purely natural conditions under which minds may
become more or less receptive to ideas, and MindWar should
take full advantage of such phenomena as atmospheric electromagnetic
activity, air ionization, and extremely low frequency
waves," the paper concluded. [...]
|
Israeli troops have
completed the evacuation of settlers from Gaza and West
Bank in line with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's withdrawal
plan. |
** Israeli activist
Susan Nathan who recently visited Ireland was interviewed
by the Irish Times July 28. On August 2, the foreign editor
of the paper gave permission to post the following article:
The most accurate description of Susan Nathan comes from
herself: "What I do is that I live what comes out
of my mouth." She is the only Jew among 25,000 Arabs
in the northern Israeli town of Tamra and has taken up
the cause of the Palestinians who remained inside the
borders of Israel after the state was set up in 1948.
Her harshest critics could not say she has chosen a comfortable
path. Friends and even some relatives have turned against
her, she says, but she is standing by her controversial
claim that the Palestinians in Israel are victims of apartheid-style
discrimination and mistreatment.
Now she’s written a book to tell her story and
make her case, The Other Side of Israel: My Journey Across
the Jewish-Arab Divide (HarperCollins). The writing style
is direct and simple: she wanted "Joe Bloggs on the
street" to be able to read it and say, "I didn’t
understand that it was like that". In person, too,
Nathan is direct and to the point. As far as she is concerned,
the issue itself is a simple one. Her Jewish co-religionists
took the land from the Palestinians, who have been severely
oppressed and treated as second-class citizens ever since.
She only came to this conclusion in her 50s, having been
an ardent Zionist all her life. It took a long time for
the penny to drop but there is now no self-doubt or hesitation.
Nathan says that initially she was "brainwashed
and in love with the Zionist narrative". Very few
non-Jewish people understood the power of Zionist propaganda.
"You are brought up to believe that you are outside
of society, that you are forever persecuted, that Israel
is your safe haven . . . It is like being part of a cult."
The Zionist claim that Israel exists for the salvation
of the Jews in case of another Holocaust was "a very
cynical misuse of people’s fears and the Holocaust".
She is the daughter of a Harley Street physician. Her
father, Samuel Levy, studied in South Africa and then
Trinity College Dublin in the late 1920s and early 1930s.
"He used to spend Friday night and all Saturday with
the family of Chaim Herzog [future president of Israel,
whose father was Ireland’s chief rabbi]."
The family came from the Baltic region. Fleeing anti-Semitic
pogroms, they made their way to Odessa on the Black Sea.
Family lore has it that they wanted to go to Hamburg but
the ship was full so they had to sail for South Africa
instead. "And that’s how we escaped the Holocaust."
Born in 1949, she grew up in South Africa and England.
She got married, reared a family and got divorced when
she was 50. Initially she was an avid supporter of the
Israeli state. Having worked as a teacher and HIV/Aids
therapist, Nathan decided at last to realise her lifelong
Zionist dream of emigrating to Israel. "I applied
under the Right of Return," she says. Under Israeli
law, anyone with a Jewish grandparent can emigrate to
Israel and become a citizen.
"It was a wonderful homecoming. I believed the Zionist
ideology, I really believed this was ’a land without
a people for a people without a land’. Palestinians
were not on the map for me in any shape or form."
She was offered "a very good job" teaching business
English in Tel Aviv. Around the time of her arrival, the
latest intifada rebellion erupted at the end of 2000.
She saw "the wonderful achievements of our forces"
being extolled on Israeli television.
"I really fell for that line," she says. But
then she became very ill and had to be hospitalized and
this brought her into close regular contact with Palestinians.
She began to ask herself, "Where am I in this society,
what is my role?" She became involved with a Palestinian-Jewish
NGO dealing with deprived communities, and worked on a
project in Tamra. "I started to understand the enormous
similarities between Arab-Israeli society and black society
during the apartheid years in South Africa."
But it’s not as if Israel adopts petty measures
such as having separate Arab and Jewish toilets the way
South Africa had separate toilets for blacks and whites.
"In Israel it’s far more sophisticated than
that, because it’s all heavily veiled. It’s
very important for Israel to be seen to be democratic,
Western, accepted by the US and Europe." But as far
as she is concerned: "Israeli society in its current
form really equals a half democracy, a democracy for Jews
only."
Nathan’s version of Israeli history would not find
favour in Zionist circles: "The major form of discrimination
comes in the confiscation and appropriation of Arab land.
All of the state of Israel is built on Palestinian land.
Around 480 to 500 villages were totally destroyed during
the battle of Israeli independence in 1948. And this discrimination
and dispossession goes on and on and on.
"Israel is the only country in the world where you
can be an eternal refugee, where you can be present but
absent by law from your property, being deprived of the
right of return to your property and your land, even though
you own the deeds for that property and that land, and
to be without compensation. It is appalling.
"And once I had seen the comparison with South Africa,
I decided that I could no longer keep my mouth closed."
Nathan decided to go and live among the Arabs in Israel
and "help to activate change".
She vigorously rejects any allegation that she is an
anti-Semitic or "self-hating" Jew. "One
is not called anti-British if one criticizes the policies
of the British government." This is "just a
rather nasty political ploy".
But she knows there is a price to be paid for the stand
she has taken. "Everything in life comes with a price."
Taking a phrase from the late Edward Said, she says: "What
I do with my life is the politics of embarrassment."
Predicting there will be another intifada uprising soon,
she adds: "Israel should have been the safest place
in the world for Jews to be and actually . . . now, ironically,
it has turned out to be the most dangerous." Nathan’s
"personal dream" is that Israel will ultimately
be a bi-national state."
Her sympathy for the Palestinians is largely unqualified
and she sharply rebukes a member of the audience at a
Dublin meeting who raises a question about the rights
of gays and lesbians in the Palestinian Territories. The
question is "incredibly offensive", she says,
warning of the "moral superiority of the West".
"As far as I know, you’re not a Muslim, you
don’t live in the Muslim world. The Arab world is
perfectly capable of dealing with those issues in its
own time and in its own way."
Speaking to her afterwards, I said many people would
regard gay and lesbian rights as universal human rights,
so why couldn’t outsiders raise them? "Because
I don’t think people from other cultures should
interfere."
As for suicide bombing, she says: "I don’t
condone it. I don’t say it’s right. But I
think we have to say, ’How does this come about?
Why do we have this phenomenon?’" When I put
it to her that the Irish were oppressed but didn’t
use suicide bombers, she responds: "Yes, but did
you have the entire army unleashed on you? Did you have
jet-fighters bombing your homes? Did you have your homes
demolished while you were in them? Did you have 40 years
of brutal occupation and conniving to come to some sort
of artificial peace process? Did you have that?" |
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Supporters
of President Bush clashed with anti-war activists as
they wound their way through California after rallying
in the hometown of Cindy Sheehan, the mother who started
a protest camp outside Bush's Texas ranch.
Conservative activists and military families embarked
on the tour Monday, calling it "You don't speak
for me, Cindy!" A verbal confrontation erupted
when the caravan arrived in Sacramento and was met by
anti-war protesters chanting for Bush to bring home
the troops.
Sheehan supporter Dan Elliott, 71, confronted caravan
members by waving a sign reading "Death is not
support" and heckling one of the tour's organizers
as she addressed the crowd.
"You are ruining the morale over there,"
responded Greg Parkinson, a Bush supporter.
Sheehan began her protest vigil Aug. 6 on the road
leading to Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, an act that
has encouraged anti-war activists to join her and prompted
peace vigils nationwide. Sheehan's 24-year-old son,
Army Spc. Casey Sheehan, was killed last year in
Iraq.
The pro-Bush caravan planned rallies in several California
cities before heading to Crawford, where Sheehan opponents
have formed their own camp.
"It's time to lay down the anger. We need to continue
to uphold those people over there, to uphold those men
and women with their boots on the ground," said
Deborah Johns of the Northern California Marine Moms,
who helped organize the caravan and addressed supporters
outside the Vacaville Reporter newspaper in Sheehan's
hometown.
Some caravan members called the
anti-war protesters communists and said they were "aiding
and abetting the enemy." Those comments
enraged Sheehan supporter Dee Ann Heath, who said she
has two sons serving in Iraq and another preparing to
leave.
"I don't support the war, but I support my sons,"
she said. "I simply want them to come home."
In Vacaville, Toni Colip, 50, said her son, David,
went to high school with Casey Sheehan and is now in
the Marines, although not in Iraq. She said her son
opposes Sheehan's activities and has asked her to support
his military service even if he is injured or killed.
"He said, 'Don't dishonor me, don't walk on my
grave,'" Colip said.
Sheehan vowed to remain in Texas until Bush agreed
to meet with her or until his monthlong vacation ended
Sept. 3, but she flew to Los Angeles last week after
her 74-year-old mother had a stroke. She is expected
to return to Texas in a few days.
On Monday, Bush was in Salt Lake City, where he spoke
to a national veterans group to rally support for the
war. Bush has said he sympathizes
with Sheehan, but a White House spokeswoman said he
did not plan to change his schedule and meet with her. |
"ICH" -- The media are
wrong. The people who have come out to Camp Casey to
help coordinate the press and events with me are not
putting words in my mouth, they are taking words out
of my mouth. I have been known for sometime as a person
who speaks the truth and speaks it strongly. I have
always called a liar a liar and a hypocrite a hypocrite.
Now I am urged to use softer language to appeal to a
wider audience. Why do my friends at Camp Casey think
they are there? Why did such a big movement occur from
such a small action on August 6, 2005?
I haven't had much time to analyze the Camp Casey phenomena.
I just read that I gave 250 interviews in less than
a week's time. I believe it. I would go to bed with
a raw throat every night. I got pretty tired of answering
some questions, like: "What do you want to say
to the President?" and "Do you really think
he will meet with you?" However, since my mom has
been sick I have had a chance to step back and ponder
the flood gates that I opened in Crawford, Tx.
I just read an article posted today on LewRockwell.com
by artist Robert Shetterly who painted my portrait.
The article reminded me of something I said at the Veteran's
for Peace Convention the night before I set out to Bush's
ranch in my probably futile quest for the truth. This
is what I said:
I got an email the other day and it
said, "Cindy if you didn't use so much profanity
... there's people on the fence that get offended. And
you know what I said? "You know what? You know
what, god damn it? How in the world is anybody still
sitting on that fence?
If you fall on the side that is pro-George
and pro-war, you get your ass over to Iraq, and take
the place of somebody who wants to come home. And if
you fall on the side that is against this war and against
George Bush, stand up and speak out.
This is what the Camp Casey miracle is all about. American
citizens who oppose the war but never had a conduit
for their disgust and dismay are dropping everything
and traveling to Crawford to stand in solidarity with
us who have made a commitment to sit outside of George's
ranch for the duration of the miserable Texan August.
If they can't come to Texas, they are attending vigils,
writing letters to their elected officials and to their
local newspapers; they are setting up Camp Casey branches
in their hometowns; they are sending flowers, cards,
letters, gifts, and donations here to us at Camp Casey.
We are so grateful for all of the support, but I think
pro-peace Americans are grateful for something to do,
finally.
One thing I haven't noticed or become aware of though
is an increased number of pro-war, pro-Bush people on
the other side of the fence enlisting to go and fight
George Bush's war for imperialism and insatiable greed.
The pro-peace side has gotten off their apathetic butts
to be warriors for peace and justice. Where are the
pro-war people? Everyday at Camp Casey we have a couple
of anti-peace people on the other side of the road holding
up signs that remind me that "Freedom isn't Free"
but I don't see them putting their money where their
mouths are. I don't think they
are willing to pay even a small down payment for freedom
by sacrificing their own blood or the flesh of their
children. I still challenge
them to go to Iraq and let another soldier come home.
Perhaps a soldier that is on his/her third tour of duty,
or one that has been stop-lossed after serving his/her
country nobly and selflessly, only to be held hostage
in Iraq by power mad hypocrites who have a long history
of avoiding putting their own skin in the game.
Contrary to what the main stream media thinks, I did
not just fall off a pumpkin truck in Crawford, Tx. on
that scorchingly hot day two weeks ago. I
have been writing, speaking, testifying in front of
Congressional committees, lobbying Congress, and doing
interviews for over a year now. I have been pretty
well known in the progressive, peace community and I
had many, many supporters before I even left California.
The people who supported me did so because they know
that I uncompromisingly tell the truth about this war.
I have stood up and said: "My son died for NOTHING,
and George Bush and his evil cabal and their reckless
policies killed him. My son was sent to fight in a war
that had no basis in reality and was killed for it."
I have never said "pretty
please" or "thank you." I have never
said anything wishy-washy like he uses "Patriotic
Rhetoric." I say my
son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew
he was LYING. The Downing Street Memos dated 23 July,
2002 prove that he knew that Saddam didn't have WMD's
or any ties to Al Qaeda. I believe that George
lied and he knew he was lying. He didn't use patriotic
rhetoric. He lied and made us afraid of ghosts that
weren't there. Now he is using patriotic rhetoric to
keep the US military presence in Iraq: Patriotic rhetoric
that is based on greed and nothing else.
Now I am being vilified and dragged through the mud
by the righties and so-called "fair and balanced"
main stream media who are afraid of the truth and can't
face someone who tells it by telling any truth of their
own. Now they have to twist, distort,
lie, and scrutinize anything I have ever said when they
never scrutinize anything that George Bush said or is
saying. Instead of asking George or Scotty McClellan
if he will meet with me, why aren't they asking the
questions they should have been asking all along: "Why
are our young people fighting, dying, and killing in
Iraq? What is this noble cause you are sending our young
people to Iraq for? What do you hope to accomplish there?
Why did you tell us there were WMD's and ties to Al
Qaeda when you knew there weren't? Why did you lie to
us? Why did you lie to the American people? Why did
you lie to the world? Why are
our nation's children still in harm's way and dying
everyday when we all know you lied? Why do you continually
say we have to "complete the mission" when
you know damn well you have no idea what that mission
is and you can change it at will like you change your
cowboy shirts?"
Camp Casey has grown and prospered and survived all
attacks and challenges because America is sick and tired
of liars and hypocrites and we want the answers to the
tough questions that I was the first to dare ask. THIS
is George Bush's accountability moment and he is failing
... miserably. George Bush and his advisers seriously
"misunderestimated" me when they thought they
could intimidate me into leaving before I had the answers,
or before the end of August. I can take anything they
throw at me, or Camp Casey. If it shortens the war by
a minute or saves one life, it is worth it. I think
they seriously "misunderestimated" all mothers.
I wonder if any of them had authentic mother-child relationships
and if they are surprised that there are so many mothers
in this country who are bear-like when it comes to wanting
the truth and who want to make meaning of their child's
needless and seemingly meaningless deaths?
The Camp Casey movement will not die until we have
a genuine accounting of the truth and until our troops
are brought home. Get used to
it George, we are not going away. |
Iraq's al-Qaeda claimed responsibility
Tuesday for last week's rocket attack on U.S. Navy ships
in Jordan's Red Sea port of Aqaba. On Friday, three
rockets were fired in Aqaba, a usually quiet Red Sea
resort frequented by Western and Israeli tourists.
A Jordanian soldier was killed when one rocket flew
across the bow of a U.S. Navy amphibious assault ship
and crashed into a warehouse.
Two other missiles flew in another direction, toward
Israel. One landed near a Jordanian hospital, the other
on the outskirts of an Israeli airport in the city of
Eilat.
According to an internet statement,
Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi said those who
carried out the strike had fled to safety.
"Your brothers in the al-Qaeda organization in
Iraq have been planning the Aqaba raid for a while,"
the group said in a statement posted on an Islamist
Internet site.
"The rockets were fired at their targets -- a
group of ships belonging to the crusader American forces
-- in Aqaba and Eliat.
"We would like to tell you that
we delayed claiming this attack so that our brothers
could complete their withdrawal ... and they returned
safely to their base."
Jordanian television said three attackers had escaped
across the border into Iraq but that police had arrested
a Syrian who is accused of helping them.
Zarqawi, has threatened to punish Jordan's rulers for
"aiding the treacherous enemy America." |
"ICH" -- "We consider
that it would be counter-productive and dangerous to
use force, the serious consequences of which would be
barely predictable." - warning from the Russian
Foreign Ministry to the Bush Administration about prospective
plans to attack Iran
There's only one thing that Americans need to remember
when they read about the standoff between the Bush administration
and Iran. There is no evidence
whatsoever that Iran has a nuclear weapons program.
But, don't take my word for it. That is the conclusion
of Mohammed El Baradei, the chief of the UN's watchdog
agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency; the
most respected nuclear investigative agency in the world
today.
After conducting 2 years of the most
rigorous "go anywhere, see anything" investigations,
the agency gave Iran a clean bill of health.
No nukes! Not now, not ever!
We should recall that it was the IAEA headed by El
Baradei that warned the US that Saddam did not have
a nuclear weapons program, and tried to save the Bush
administration the embarrassment of attacking an unarmed
country. That didn't work. As we know now the intelligence
was "fixed" to fit the policy, and the policy
was aggression.
With that tragedy in mind, we
should not allow ourselves to be duped by the propaganda
that passes as news in the US. We must continue
to remind ourselves over and over again; there is no
evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapons program.
None, Nada, Zippo!
This is not a detail that you should expect to see
in the western media. Of the
hundreds of articles I've combed through on Iran only
1% to 2% even casually mention this salient fact.
The reasons for this are fairly obvious to those who
watched the media carefully build the case for war with
Iraq based entirely on false information. We don't need
to go over that appalling story here. We simply need
to recognize that the media to large extent has been
successfully "embedded" into the political
establishment and operates in the interests of ownership.
If the elites who control our "privately"
owned media want war, you can bet that there will be
a torrent of cleverly-written articles supporting that
effort.
That, in fact, is what is happening with Iran today.
Two major stories appeared this week connecting Iran
to the IED (roadside bombs) that are killing American
servicemen in Iraq. One story was in Time magazine by
Michael Ware and seemed reasonably credible except that
none of the information could be reliably proved.
Is this simply more disinformation used to pave the
way for war? It certainly merges nicely with Rumsfeld's
claims that Iran is involved in the insurgency, but
it, in many respects, it completely defies logic.
Why would Iranian Shi'ites support
Sunnis in their quest to retake power?
Iran already has "their guy" al Jaffari in
the top spot so why rock the boat?
This question is never seriously addressed in either
article, which leads us to suspect that there may be
ulterior motives.
The Bush Administration has never backed away from
its original goal of "regime change" in Iran,
so we must assume that the reports of ethnic disturbances
in Iran's Ahwaz province are probably instigated by
either the CIA or surrogates in the various Iranian
dissident groups acting on behalf of the Bush administration.
The Iranian government claims to have captured suspects
of these regional uprisings and have said that they
have solid proof that they are supported by the US.
The most prominent of these
groups is the Mujahidin Klaq (MEK) a group that is still
on the US State Depts. list of terrorist organizations
even though they receive direct funding and support
from the US government. According to Seymour
Hersh the MEK and other organizations have been sent
back into Iran to foment revolution or carry out covert
operations.
Certainly no one is surprised by this given the administration's
open hostility towards the current Islamic regime. The
fact that the "ethnic strife" is taking place
in oil-rich Ahwaz province, however, is interesting.
We can be reasonably certain that the US does not plan
to occupy all of Iran if there is a war.
Can we be equally certain that the
administration strategy isn't simply to annex the primary
oil producing region and bomb the main chemical, biological
and conventional weapons sites across the country at
the same time?
That way, the US would control the
oil, eliminate Iran as a regional-military rival to
Israel, and avoid the pitfalls of a massive occupation.
There are potential hazards to Washington's prospective
plan. For one thing, Iran has violated none of its agreements
under the current NPT (Nuclear Nonproliferation treaty)
so, there is no reason for the IAEA to refer the case
to the UN Security Council and no cause for punitive
action. Iran is allowed to convert uranium under the
NPT if it is carefully monitored by the watchdog agency
and if it is used strictly for peaceful purposes. The
conversion process does not produce weapons-grade enriched
uranium, which can be used in nuclear weapons, but a
milder form that can be used in nuclear power plants.
If there are any violations to this regimen, the IAEA
is required to report them immediately to the Security
Council.
So, we can see that the US is just ratcheting up the
pressure in the media to make it appear as though the
EU supports the hard-line policies of the Bush administration
and is willing to support their position before the
UNSC.
The EU, of course, is simply being bullied by the administration
and trying to avoid the impending conflict.
Another possible drawback to the Bush strategy is the
sudden and unexpected insertion of Russia into the standoff.
Last week Russia cautioned the US against considering
the use of force with Iran. The Russian foreign ministry
issued a statement saying, "We consider that it
would be counter-productive and dangerous to use force,
the serious consequences of which would be barely predictable."
Russia's statement was predictably
oblique, but the message is clear; Russia
will not allow Iran to go the way of Iraq. Not
surprisingly, this veiled-threat of Russian retaliation
did not appear in any newspaper in the United States.
It simply wouldn't due to have the American public know
that the administration was risking nuclear holocaust
to further its interests in the region.
When I wrote my first article on this topic 2 weeks
ago ("Why Iran will lead to World War 3) very few
readers took the possibility seriously. Since then,
the more-insightful political analyst Paul
Craig Roberts added his voice to the fray with his article
"Get Ready for WW 3". This
new statement from the Russian foreign ministry should
demonstrate that we may be closer to the brink then
anyone had imagined.
The UN and the EU need to convene meetings immediately
on the likelihood of an American attack on Iran and
issue an unambiguous statement that any military action
taken on the part of the United States or Israel without
Security Council approval will be taken as a direct
assault on the rest of the international community an
a tacit declaration of world war. This is no time for
equivocating or backpedaling. World leaders need to
rise to the occasion and perform their duties. As we
know from Iraq, if Washington is planning for war, it
won't be easily deterred. |
Michael Graham's suspension by
management at ABC Radio's WMAL/Washington for recent
on-air comments in which he characterized
Islam as a terrorist organization has turned
into a permanent furlough for the controversial midday
talker. The Council on American-Islamic Relations have
continued to denounce Graham's comments as "hate-filled"
and have called for the talk host's ouster ever since
he made the comments on his program in late July.
In a statement released by Graham regarding his firing,
the talk host said, "The First Amendment and I
have been evicted from ABC Radio in Washington, DC.
It appears that ABC Radio has
caved to an organization that condemns Talk radio hosts
like me but has never condemned Hamas, Hezbollah and
wouldn't specifically condemn Al Qaeda for three months
after 9/11. As a fan of Talk radio, I find it absolutely
outrageous that pressure from a special interest group
like CAIR can result in the abandonment of free speech
and open discourse on a talk radio show."
Asked to comment on Graham's accusations, WMAL President/GM
Chris Berry told R&R, "Typically we don't comment
on personnel matters, but given the misstatements being
communicated, I want to set the record straight. Some
of Michael's statements about Islam went over the line
- and this isn't the first time that he has been reprimanded
for insensitive language and comments. I asked Michael
for an on-air acknowledgement that some of his remarks
were overly broad and inexplicably he refused. Michael
has also tried to position this by saying that we were
pressured into taking disciplinary action against him.
For the record, we make our decisions independent of
external pressures or third parties. We will not permit
an employee to willfully violate our policies or disregard
management direction."
Berry also noted that although WMAL PD Randall Bloomquist
was out of the station this week on a long-planned vacation,
he was "in the loop" on the decision to terminate
Graham. |
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. - An online
thesaurus struck a listing Monday for the word "Arab"
after Arab-American groups complained the entry listed
derogatory synonyms.
The entry, which appeared on thesaurus.com,
listed the word ["Arab"] as a noun meaning
"beggar," and gave 16 pejorative synonyms
including "homeless person" and "welfare
bum."
The American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee contacted
the synonym book's online publisher Friday to complain
about the entry; the American Arab Forum also criticized
the listing on Monday.
"I looked it up and I couldn't believe what I
was seeing," said Aref Assaf, president of the
American Arab Forum, which is based in Paterson.
Several hours after Roget's Thesaurus
was called by The Associated Press, all entries for
"Arab" had been pulled from the site.
Barbara Ann Kipfer, editor of the
third edition of Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus, said
the entry had likely been on the site for years, but
never made it into printed versions of the thesaurus.
"We're simply going to take it out," she
said on Monday. "The last thing you want with a
thesaurus is to offend anyone."
Kipfer said an 18th-century term "street arab"
had appeared in other thesauruses, referring to a homeless
child who has been abandoned and roams through the streets.
The Internet publishing group that produces the thesaurus.com
Web site also said it was surprised to learn of the
entry.
"We got together and tried to resolve it as soon
as possible," said Jasper Chou, director for marketing
for Lexico Group.
Assaf said he was satisfied that the listing had been
removed.
"We look forward to working with
them, should they need a proper definition of the word.
The easier definition is 'anyone who is Arabic,' which
would have been more than sufficient," he said.
|
WASHINGTON - Asking for increased
vigilance in the wake of the London bombings, the government
is warning that terrorists may pose as vagrants to conduct
surveillance of buildings and mass transit stations
to plot future attacks.
"In light of the recent bombings in London, it
is crucial that police, fire and emergency medical personnel
take notice of their surroundings, and be aware of 'vagrants'
who seem out of place or unfamiliar," said the
message, distributed via e-mail to some federal employees
in Washington by the U.S. Attorney's office.
It is based on a State Department report that was issued
last week. The State Department had no immediate comment
Monday.
The warning is similar to one issued by the FBI before
July 4, 2004 that said terrorists may attempt surveillance
disguised as homeless people,
shoe shiners, street vendors or street sweepers.
The e-mail stresses that there is no
threat of an attack and that it is intended to be "informative,
not alarming."
Homeless people easily blend into urban landscapes,
the message said.
"This is particularly true of our mass transit
systems, where homeless people tend to loiter unnoticed,"
the e-mail said.
It referred to a recent incident in Somerville, Mass.,
in which a police officer became suspicious about someone
dressed as a street person. The officer questioned the
man, discovered he had a passport from a "country
of interest" - typically a Middle Eastern or South
Asian nation - and a checkbook with a questionable address,
the e-mail said. The investigation is continuing, it
said.
The incident happened in early July, Somerville city
spokesman Mark Horan said, when the man walked back
and forth in front of the
Social Security office in Somerville's Davis Square
and kept looking in the windows.
"This was right after one of the London bombings,"
Horan said. "There was an even higher degree of
sensitivity."
The man was evasive about what he was doing but wasn't
arrested. Somerville police didn't investigate further
but passed the information on to the FBI, Horan said.
There haven't been any similar incidents in Somerville,
he said.
FBI spokeswoman Gail Marcinkiewicz would not comment
on whether an investigation is ongoing.
Three British citizens were indicted
in the United States earlier this year on charges they
conducted surveillance of the New York Stock Exchange
and other East Coast financial institutions in 2000
and 2001.
Discovery of the alleged terrorist plan last year prompted
the
Homeland Security Department to raise the terror alert
for the targeted buildings, located in New York, Washington
and Newark, N.J. Security in those cities also was tightened.
Homeland Security also raised the terror alert for
mass transit following the July 7 bombings in London.
The alert was lowered on Aug. 12. |
Air Force officials are busy notifying
more than 33,000 airmen that a security breach has occurred
with the Air Force's online assignment and career management
system. Officials with the Air Force Personnel Center
noticed "unusually high activity on a single user's
Assignment Management System account in June,"
according to an Air Force announcement released on Friday.
The attacker accessed and downloaded such personal information
as birthdates and social security numbers via a user's
legitimate log-in information.
The incident occurred at the Randolph Air Force Base
in Texas. Officials at the base have contacted the Air
Force and federal investigators and an investigation
is ongoing, according to a military spokeswoman. |
None of the cameras at the scene
of the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes at Stockwell
Tube station on 22 July were working, a police document
revealed.
Cameras on the platform and the train were not operational,
officers told the Independent Police Complaints Commission
(IPCC). The submission by the
Metropolitan Police, obtained by ITV News, puts officers
at odds with a statement from Tube Lines, the company
operating the station.
The police document says: "Stockwell
station and environs has been surveyed and all existing
CCTV has been seized.
"During the course of this it has been established
that although there was onboard CCTV in the train, due
to previous incidents the harddrive has been removed
and not replaced.
"It has also been established
that there has been a technical problem with the CCTV
equipment on the relevant platform and no footage exists."
However in a statement to The Mail
on Sunday, Tube Lines said: "We are not aware of
any faults on CCTV cameras at that station on that day.
Nothing of that nature has been reported to us."
Yesterday the company refused to elaborate.
While some sources denied police had deliberately wiped
the tapes, others remained convinced there was a cover-up.
One union official argued however that the on-board
cameras may have been empty.
Employees' representatives said Met officers emptied
the cameras the day before police killed Mr de Menezes
as part of their investigation into the failed bombings
on 21 July.
According to a report he would
have passed eight cameras, two in the station
entrance pointing at the barriers, another aimed at
the Northern Line escalator and another on the way down.
When Mr de Menezes reached the bottom of the escalator,
another camera would have captured him. And as he turned
on to the platform one above the track and three more
at each end of the platform would have caught him on
film, the reports say.
This information should have been sent to a control
room and passed to video tape. Yet there is apparently
no footage of him in and around the platform.
The source, who is close to
the investigation, said reports of a cover-up were "absolute
rubbish''. The source said reports that the tapes
had been handed back to London Underground staff were
"nonsense'' because such material would have been
kept as evidence in the ongoing inquiry.
A spokesman for the IPCC said: "We are not willing
to comment about every story that comes up.''
But confusion still surrounds the contents of surveillance
tapes taken from Stockwell station. Sources have suggested
that the tapes had been recovered from the station booking
hall, which had shown images of Mr de Menezes and that
there was limited footage from cameras inside the carriage
where the shooting took place.
All Northern Line Tube trains are
equipped with CCTV - at either end of the carriages,
but the only photograph published of the incident seems
to have been taken from a doorway.
The confusion deepened as two senior
Brazilian officials flew into London to examine the
background to Mr de Menezes' death. The officials will
want to know if CCTV footage of the incident exists.
The Brazilian government has expressed "shock and
bewilderment" over the death and has said it wants
answers to "a number of matters".
Wagner Goncalves, of the federal prosecutor's office,
and Marcio Pereira Pinto Garcia, of the ministry of
justice, went from Heathrow airport to Scotland Yard,
where they met senior officers led by deputy assistant
commissioner John Yates. They are also due to meet members
of the IPCC tomorrow.
Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner,
has faced unrelenting pressure since it emerged last
week that initial police accounts of the killing were
at variance with the facts.
Members of the Metropolitan Police Authority yesterday
said Sir Ian still had their full confidence, but admitted
that a public inquiry into the death appeared inevitable.
For the second time in two days, Downing Street issued
a statement declaring the Prime Minister's complete
confidence in the Commissioner.
A spokeswoman said Mr Blair, who is on holiday in Barbados,
had been kept fully up to speed with the matter. She
added: "The Prime Minister recognises that the
Metropolitan Police, led by Sir Ian Blair, do a very
difficult job and they do it very well."
Clare Short, the former Cabinet Minister,
said it was now clear that the public had been misled
over the death of Mr de Menezes. She told ITV News:
"We've been lied to. This should be bigger than
just calling for Sir Ian Blair to go. We need to find
out exactly what happened. Who was telling the lies?"
As relatives and supporters of Mr de Menezes began
a vigil outside Downing Street, his mother, Maria de
Menezes, demanded justice for her son.
She said of the officers who shot: "They took
my son's life. I am suffering because of that."
Speaking from Brazil, she told the BBC: "I want
the policeman who did that punished. They ended not
only my son's life but mine as well."
Mr de Menezes' cousin, Alessandro Pereira, handed a
letter to Downing Street demanding a public inquiry.
The unanswered questions
* If the CCTV cameras showed Mr de Menezes using his
Oyster card to open the ticket barrier, why did police
sources suggest he vaulted it?
* Were cameras trained on the platform in full working
order? Police and Tube sources contradict each other.
* How could all four cameras around the platform have
failed at the same time?
* If the cameras had failed,
why did the station log book contain no details of the
fault?
* Why had CCTV onboard the train been removed? |
BEIJING - A pig-borne disease has
claimed a 40th human life in China, and the first in
southern Guangdong province, days after the government
said it had brought the disease under control elsewhere.
Three other people in Guangdong were also found to
be infected with the streptococosis suis bacteria, provincial
health bureau Wei Jiafen said.
"The lone fatality occurred in Yangjiang (city),"
he told AFP.
All the other fatalities from the disease were recorded
in Sichuan province, further west, which also has about
200 infections.
The latest announcement came two days after the nation's
health and agricultural ministries said the outbreak
in Sichuan province had been brought under control.
All the victims from Sichuan were found to have had
direct contact with sick or dead pigs or infected pork.
It was not clear how the Guangdong infections were spread.
Medical teams have been sent to the affected areas
in the province to investigate the cases and help locals
take protective measures, Xinhua news agency reported.
The provincial government also mobilized health and
agriculture departments to take emergency measures to
prevent the disease from spreading, it said.
No new human cases have been reported in Sichuan province
since August 6. Twenty people there remain hospitalised
with the disease.
Nowhere in the world have more people been struck down
by the streptococcus suis bacteria -- which usually
affects pigs, not humans -- since the first human case
was recorded in Denmark in 1968.
China's central government has ordered local governments
across the country to tighten supervision of pork markets
and has banned the butchering, transport and sale of
dead or sick pigs to prevent the disease from spreading.
At least eight government officials were sacked for
failing to prevent farmers from butchering sick pigs
or fabricating reports saying infected pigs had been
disposed of hygienically, Xinhua said. |
European farmers on Monday began
taking action to prevent the spread of a deadly strain
of bird flu from Asia, amid fears it could devastate
the poultry sector and infect humans.
Dutch farmers were ordered to bring all 5.5m free-range
poultry indoors and the German government said it might
take similar action within days. The moves came amid
renewed calls for an international effort to contain
the disease as concern grew that it could be spread
by wild birds migrating from Siberia.
“All countries of the world must unite in the
struggle against bird flu,” said Yevgeny Nepokhlonov,
a senior Russian government veterinary official.
The discovery of the H5N1 virus in
Siberia in July has prompted fears the lethal flu strain
which has killed more than 60 people in south-east Asia
and ravaged the region's poultry industry could spread
across the Ural mountains into Europe.
Veterinary experts from the 25 European Union member
states meet on Thursday to discuss what further action,
if any, should be taken. The European Commission said
yesterday it saw no need at the moment for other European
countries to follow the Dutch lead. The EU has already
banned live poultry and feather imports from Russia
and Kazakhstan.
“Our assessment of the risk is that it is relatively
low but not non-existent,” said a spokesman.
The commission argues that Australia and New Zealand
also receive migratory birds from Asian countries affected
by the virus, but that neither country had reported
cases of bird flu in the last two years.
The UK also played down the threat posed by migratory
birds. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural
Affairs said it was not planning any measures to keep
poultry indoors. However, fears of a global epidemic
have prompted calls for a cull of migratory birds in
areas like Siberia, south-east Asia and South Africa.
Mr Nepokhlonov warned that since flying
birds were thought to be susceptible to the virus “the
disease could now crop up in any corner of the planet”.
Russian authorities said yesterday the outbreak of
bird flu had been contained and that no big industrial
poultry farms had been contaminated.
Some 120,000 birds have been culled in Russia since
the disease broke out in July. Bird flu has killed more
than 11,000 more, but there have been no reported human
cases.
Japanese authorities yesterday said
they had detected another outbreak of bird flu at a
poultry farm near Tokyo, although the strain involved
is less virulent that the H5N1 variety. |
ALBANY, N.Y. -- A New York state
assemblyman is launching an inquiry into the state-run
water playground that may have spread more than 2,000
cases of gastrointestinal illnesses.
"All visitors to New York State Parks should be
confident that they will have a healthy and safe experience,"
State Assemblyman Joseph Morelle said in a statement.
The number of reported gastrointestinal illnesses possibly
spread by the water playground at Seneca Lake Park has
grown to 2,202 cases across 24 counties in western and
central New York as of Monday.
So far, 13 cases in four different counties have been
confirmed as cryptosporidiosis, a common waterborne
disease.
Tests conducted by the Health Department have found
the presence of cryptosporidium in two storage tanks
that supply water for the spray park.
The Health Department initially shut down the Sprayground
temporarily last week after receiving more than 100
reported cases of illness dating back to early July.
Morelle, a Democrat from Irondequoit, chairs the Assembly
Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development that
oversees the state park system and tourism attractions
in New York. |
A scientist who has long disagreed
with the dominant view that global warming stems mainly
from human activity has resigned from a panel that is
completing a report for the Bush administration on temperature
trends in the atmosphere.
The scientist, Roger A. Pielke Sr., a climatologist
at Colorado State University, said most of the other
scientists working on the report were too deeply wedded
to particular views and were discounting minority opinions
on the quality of climate records and possible causes
of warming.
"When you appoint people to a
committee who are experts in an area but evaluating
their own work," he said in an interview, "it's
very difficult for them to think outside the box of
their research."
Administration officials said the resignation would
not affect the quality or credibility of the report,
a draft of which is being finished in the next few weeks.
The report, the first product of President Bush's 10-year
climate change research program, is likely to be closely
scrutinized by climate scientists and environmental
and industry groups for any sign of bias or distortion.
Its main focus is to explore why thermometers at the
earth's surface, especially in the tropics, have measured
more warming than has been detected by satellites and
weather balloons in the troposphere, the layer of the
atmosphere up to where jetliners cruise.
Dr. Pielke contends that changes in landscapes like
the spread of agriculture and cities could explain many
of the surface climate trends, while most climate experts
now see a clear link to accumulating emissions of heat-trapping
gases like carbon dioxide.
James R. Mahoney, an assistant secretary
of commerce and the director of the federal climate
research program, said the scientists involved in generating
the report were "representative of the broad views"
on the questions.
Mr. Mahoney noted that drafts of the climate report
would be reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences
and were subject to public comment.
"I'm disappointed that Dr. Pielke has chosen to
resign over this," Mr. Mahoney said.
Dr. Pielke said he decided to resign after three papers
on the troposphere trends were published online on Aug.
11 by the journal Science. The papers said errors in
satellite and balloon studies in the tropics explained
why earlier analyses failed to find warming in the troposphere.
Several authors of those papers, who are also authors
of the coming government report, said at the time that
the new findings would be discussed in the report.
Dr. Pielke said those statements were an effort to
influence the shape of the final report.
Several authors of those papers denied this, saying
the process of creating the reports is intended to be
public, while the contents remain confidential for now.
John R. Christy, another author of the coming report
who like Dr. Pielke doubts that human-caused warming
poses a serious threat, said that while disagreements
were normal, the effort to generate the report was improving
understanding.
"This process is the worst way
to generate scientific information," said Dr. Christy,
who teaches at the University of Alabama, Huntsville.
"Except for all the others." |
WASHINGTON - Emissions of heat-trapping
carbon dioxide from U.S. cars and trucks soared 25 percent
between 1990 and 2003 as more vehicles hit the roads
and consumers flocked to gas-guzzling sport utility
vehicles, a U.S. environmental group said on Wednesday.
Despite efforts to introduce cleaner
hybrid vehicles, the biggest U.S. automakers have failed
to reverse growing greenhouse gas emissions, Environmental
Defense said.
"Emissions keep rising despite factors that many
people think should lower them," said John DeCicco
of the group.
Vehicles made by General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor
Co. led the increase in gases linked to global warming.
Carbon dioxide emissions from GM's 2003 model year vehicles
rose 6.3 percent to 6.4 million metric tons, while Ford's
increased 7.7 percent to 5 million metric tons, Environmental
Defense said.
In 2003, emissions from cars
and light trucks topped 317 million metric tons, up
25 percent from 1990, the group said, based on
federal government data.
Part of the 13-year increase is due to more vehicles
on the road. However, Americans also bought more sport
utility vehicles and mini-vans during that period, and
they get fewer miles per gallon of gasoline.
Automakers say they are doing their part by offering
consumers new high-tech vehicles powered by cleaner
hybrid, diesel and fuel cell engines.
"The auto industry is offering a vast array of
highly fuel-efficient, low-emission vehicles to the
public, and those are available on dealer lots today,"
said Eron Shosteck at the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers,
which represents Detroit automakers and some foreign
firms.
The United States is the world's largest
emitter of greenhouse gases, which are linked to rising
ocean tides, melting glaciers and wildlife extinction.
The majority of American carbon emissions
are from coal-fired utilities and plants, but cars and
light trucks accounted for about 20 percent of the total.
|
OSLO, Norway - Salmon swim north
into Arctic seas, locusts plague northern Italy and
two heat-loving bee-eater birds nest in a hedge in Britain.
Signs of global warming fed by greenhouse gases produced
by human activity, or just summertime oddities?
In the United States, some warblers are flying north
to Canada. In Costa Rica, toucans are moving higher
up into the mountains, apparently because of rising
temperatures.
In July, a Norwegian man fishing in a fjord had a shock
when he landed a John Dory, a fish more usually found
in temperate waters off southern Europe or Africa.
"There's a long list of migratory species ending
up further north. It's certainly a sign of warmer temperatures,"
said Steve Sawyer, climate policy director at the Greenpeace
environmental group.
He said salmon had been swimming through the Bering
Strait between Alaska and Russia into the Chukchi Sea,
apparently because the frigid water had warmed up.
Such shifts could have vast long-term implications
for farmers and fishing fleets.
However, some experts are skeptical that unusual sightings
of everything from bears to butterflies support theories
that temperatures are rising because of a build-up of
heat-trapping gases emitted by cars, factories and power
plants.
"If you want to measure temperatures, you use
a thermometer, not a bird," said Fred Singer, who
heads the U.S. Science and Environmental Policy Project.
"Birds have all sorts of reasons for moving north,
south, sideways or whatever."
Singer says people and creatures have adapted to unexplained
changes in temperature, linked to natural variation,
throughout history. Some species simply move in unexpected
directions or unwittingly stow away on trucks, planes
or ships.
ROBINS IN ARCTIC
However, U.N. data show that the warmest year since
records began in the 1860s was 1998, followed by 2002,
2003 and 2004. Most scientists link the rise in temperatures
to human emissions of carbon dioxide from burning fossil
fuels, rather than natural change.
The panel that advises the United Nations says that
rising temperatures may drive thousands of species to
extinction and cause more storms, floods and deserts
while raising sea levels, perhaps by 3 feet by 2100.
Inuit peoples have noted southerly
species of wildlife reaching the Arctic in summertime
in recent years, including robins, hornets and barn
owls.
Anecdotal evidence from further south is piling up.
Two yellow, green and brown bee-eater birds, usually
found in southern Europe, have nested in a hedge in
southern England -- the fourth time a bee-eater nest
has been found in Britain.
"It looks as if it's linked to climate change,"
John Lanchbery, head of climate policy at Britain's
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, said of a
general shift northwards of birds in Europe.
Growing seasons have extended and
seas have become warmer, he said.
However, some examples are misleading.
In the Piedmont region of northern Italy this summer,
residents were surprised by swarms of locusts, suspecting
they had flown over from Africa.
Insect experts said they were an Italian species and
did not migrate over long distances. Still, an exceptionally
hot summer in 2003 has meant more parched ground, ideal
conditions for the pests to lay their eggs.
"Global warming could also be a reason,"
said Vincenzo Girolami, an entomologist at Padua University.
If there were more hotter, drier summers, there were
likely to be more swarms of locusts in Italy, he said.
HEADACHE FOR RANGERS
In the United States, birds such as the Cape May warbler
and Blackburnian warbler are moving north into Canada,
causing a headache for forest rangers.
If the birds leave, spruce forests
in the United States could be vulnerable to attacks
by spruce budworm caterpillars, normally eaten by the
birds. If the caterpillars are left to thrive they will
eat, and dry out, the trees.
"The trees could be more
stressed which could lead to more fires,"
said Terry Root, a professor at Stanford University
in the United States. "We could really have a difficult
situation."
In Costa Rica's Monteverde cloud forest, toucans, with
their brightly-colored, banana-shaped bills, are threatening
another species, the spectacular green quetzal, by moving
to higher altitudes where the quetzals nest, she said. |
VIRGINIA BEACH —
Wildlife officials are investigating the mysterious deaths
of hundreds of sea birds that have washed up on beaches
along the Atlantic coast since mid-June, including south
of Sandbridge and on the Outer Banks.
Most of the birds have been greater shearwaters , which
are now migrating north from their breeding grounds in
the South Atlantic. The birds, while fairly common, are
rarely seen by beachgoers because they typically stay
30 to 100 miles offshore, where they feed on small fish
and squid.
Some of the birds have washed up alive, unable to fly
and appearing weak, and later died. The number of dead
birds has alarmed wildlife officials, who are scrambling
to pinpoint a cause.
More than 500 dead sea birds have been reported from
Maryland to Florida since June 12, said Emi Saito, a wildlife
disease specialist with the U.S. Geological Survey’s
National Wildlife Health Center in Madison, Wis.
Wildlife pathologists are examining the carcasses for
exposure to toxins, pollutants such as heavy metals and
infections that might indicate a broader environmental
concern, she said.
During the past week, staffers at the Back Bay National
Wildlife Refuge in Virginia Beach have found about a dozen
dead greater shearwaters on the beach, said Dorie Stolley,
a wildlife biologist.
Only a few remained in good enough condition to be examined,
and the others were incinerated by city animal control
officers, she said.
Staffers used rubber gloves and took other precautions
while collecting the birds. People are advised not to
touch dead birds they find on the beach.
Reports of dead birds also have come from Ocracoke and
Hatteras Island on the Outer Banks.
Diane Duncan, an ecologist with the federal wildlife
agency’s Ecological Services Office in Charleston,
S.C., said the first reports came from Myrtle Beach, Hilton
Head and several nearby islands.
Nearly 200 birds have washed up since then in South Carolina,
Duncan said.
“In 20 years here, I have never seen this kind
of mortality event,” Duncan said. “It certainly
is a concern to us, and we’d like to know the cause.”
Tests on two of the birds ruled out toxins found in red
tide, a type of algal bloom that biologists initially
suspected as a culprit, Duncan said.
Will Post, an ornithologist and curator at The Charleston
Museum, said he had dissected six greater shearwaters
that had washed up alive, unable to fly, and later died.
The birds’ stomachs were empty, but they had varying
levels of fat reserves, suggesting that they did not die
of starvation, Post said.
“They were below normal weight, but that’s
normal when they’re in migration,” he said.
The shearwaters fly nearly 5,000 miles during their annual
migrations to and from their nesting grounds on Tristan
da Cunha, a chain of volcanic islands in the South Atlantic,
Post said. The cold-water birds breed in April and May
and then fly to their summer grounds off New England and
points north, he said.
Islanders in the South Atlantic are allowed to harvest
about 50,000 of the young birds a year for food, which
is controversial, Post said. There’s an estimated
5 million breeding pairs, he added.
The birds resemble gulls in appearance and size, with
brown to gray heads and white undersides. They have webbed
feet and dark, tube like bills.
Since they spend their lives at sea, Post said, they
are able to drink salt water, excreting excess salt through
special glands in their heads. |
OCEAN CITY -- Wildlife
officials are warning the public to avoid contact with
dead sea birds that have washed up on Maryland's Eastern
Shore recently, following reports of mystery deaths of
greater shearwaters that have washed ashore since mid-June
from Florida to Virginia.
Jack Kumer of the Assateague Island National Seashore
said Assateague employees have discovered an unusual amount
of the dead or dying birds on the park's shores starting
three weeks ago.
"So far there have been 12 birds, most of which
were dead and a couple living that we were monitoring.
There were two in the first week and eight the second
week," Kumer said.
Most of the dead birds are the pelagic -- or sea going
-- greater shearwater and the number of dead birds washed
ashore throughout the eastern seaboard is reported to
be approaching 1,000 during the past few weeks.
Kumer warned the public to avoid contact with the dead
birds.
"What I like to tell people when I see the public
interacting with an animal that is dead is that animal
died from something, there's a good chance it died from
a disease and they have diseases that humans can contract,"
he said.
"I want no visitor to Ocean City or Assateague to
touch any animal that has died because something killed
that animal and you don't want to find out what did it."
According to Maryland DNR associate director Mark Hoffman
the shearwaters are "very common visitors to Maryland
waters. They're fairly common summer visitors here with
peak months in May and June. They breed in the South Atlantic
and migrate to the North Atlantic off the coast of Newfoundland
most commonly."
Department of Natural Resources veterinarian, Dr. Cindy
Driscoll, said since the dead birds found on Assateague
"are pelagic, we rarely see them on shore so that
number is above normal."
Driscoll said she called Ocean City beach clean up last
week and they hadn't reported any dead shearwaters, but
said she had everyone alerted to the situation and had
them on the lookout with rehabilitators ready in the event
of any live cases.
As the situation worsened in Florida, Georgia and the
Carolinas weeks ago and cases climbed to the hundreds,
dead shearwaters were shipped for testing at the National
Wildlife Health Center in Madison, Wis., but diagnostic
tests still have not revealed an answer as to the cause
of the bird's deaths.
Kumer said theories include a possible bird virus, harmful
bacteria, harmful algal bloom such as the "red tide,"
a problem with the bird's food sources or something as
simple as a change in the birds migratory path.
"It could be something quite natural," Kumer
said. "The population of the birds is fairly sizeable
and there could be any number of the birds that die every
day. If the population shifted closer to North America
this year, it could explain the mortality because there
could have always been this many dying and we'd never
know because they were further out in the Atlantic."
Official word on the cause of the mass shearwater deaths
is expected in the coming weeks from diagnostic tests
performed in Madison. Until that time Driscoll and Kumer
said numbers of shearwater cases will continue to mount
in Maryland, but they do not predict the numbers will
reach into the hundreds of cases like in the Southern
states. |
SEATTLE - Scientists
suspect that rising ocean temperatures and dwindling plankton
populations are behind a growing number of seabird deaths,
reports of fewer salmon and other anomalies along the
West Coast.
Coastal ocean temperatures are 2 to 5 degrees above normal,
apparently caused by a lack of upwelling - a process that
brings cold, nutrient-rich water to the surface and jump-starts
the marine food chain.
Upwelling fuels algae and shrimplike krill populations
that feed small fish, which provide an important food
source for a variety of sea life, from salmon to sea birds
and marine mammals.
"Something big is going on out there," said
Julia Parrish, an associate professor in the School of
Aquatic Fisheries and Sciences at the University of Washington.
"I'm left with no obvious smoking gun, but birds
are a good signal because they feed high up on the food
chain."
This spring, scientists reported a record number of dead
seabirds washed up on beaches along the Pacific Coast,
from central California to British Columbia.
In Washington state, the highest numbers of dead seabirds
- particularly Brandt's cormorants and common murres -
were found along the southern coast at Ocean Shores.
Bird surveyors in May typically find an average of one
dead Brandt's cormorant every 34 miles of beach. But this
year, cormorant deaths averaged one every eight-tenths
of a mile, according to data gathered by volunteers with
the Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team, which
Parrish has directed since 2000.
"This is somewhere between five and 10 times the
highest number of bird deaths we've seen before,"
she said.
Parrish expects June figures to show a similar trend.
Upwelling is fueled by northerly winds that sweep out
near-shore waters and bring cold water to the surface.
"You can think of it like a cup of coffee,"
Parrish explained. "When you pour in cold cream and
then blow across the cup, the cream rises up from the
bottom."
But this spring's cool, wet weather brought southwesterly
winds to coastal areas and very little northerly winds,
said Nathan Mantua, a research scientist with the Climate
Impacts Group at the University of Washington.
And without upwelling, high-fat plankton such as krill
stay at lower depths.
"In 50 years, this has never happened," said
Bill Peterson, an oceanographer with the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Newport, Ore.
"If this continues, we will have a food chain that
is basically impoverished from the very lowest levels."
NOAA's June and July surveys of juvenile salmon off the
coasts of Oregon, Washington and British Columbia indicate
a 20 to 30 percent drop in populations, compared with
surveys from 1998-2004, especially coho and chinook.
"We don't really know that this will cause bad returns.
The runs this year haven't been horrible, but below average,"
said Ed Casillas, program manager of Estuarine and Ocean
Ecology at NOAA's Northwest Fisheries Science Center in
Seattle.
"The take-away message is that we are seeing unusual
conditions so we need to be cautious with returns for
the next one to four years," he said. "Managers
need to put enough time, people and money on the ocean
side of the question."
This spring, scientists began tracking anomalies along
Washington's coast, from the appearance of warm-water
plankton species to scores of jellyfish piling up on beaches.
A Guadalupe fur seal, native to South America, was found
dead in Ocean Shores.
Parrish is documenting unusual breeding behavior among
common murres on Tatoosh Island off the Olympic Peninsula.
In 15 years of monitoring the murre colony, this is the
latest the birds have initiated breeding.
"They are starting very, very late and then just
giving up," she said.
Seabirds are also showing signs of stress in California,
said Bill Sydeman, director of marine ecology at Point
Reyes Bird Observatory.
Sydeman monitors a colony of Cassin's auklets in the
Farallon Islands, west of San Francisco. This spring's
breeding season was a month late, Sydeman said. Less than
half the colony tried to nest in April and then abandoned
the colony by June.
"We have been monitoring this colony for 35 years.
Never before have we seen colony abandonment," he
said. "Nobody saw this coming."
Sydeman and Parrish point to starvation stress as the
cause for decreased breeding and increased bird deaths,
especially among the cormorants, murres and auklets.
Studies of dead birds in May on California beaches found
emaciated bodies, with atrophied muscles and empty stomachs,
said Hannah Nevins, a beached-bird survey coordinator
at the Moss Landing Marine Lab in Northern California.
"Spring is when the food comes in," Nevins
said. "When you have a really strong, persistent
upwelling wind, it creates a conveyor belt of food, but
the wind is slacking this year."
Mantua, the University of Washington research scientist,
tracks ocean temperatures and climate conditions to understand
changes in currents and wind patterns. This year he found
temperatures 2 to 5 degrees above normal - readings typically
seen during an El Nino. But this is not an El Nino year,
he said.
The trend toward warmer temperatures began in fall 2002,
said Peterson, the NOAA oceanographer. No one is pointing
to one direct cause for the warmer waters, but many scientists
suspect climate change may be involved.
While Peterson is concerned about the unusual ocean conditions,
he is more worried that people will not take notice.
"People have to realize that things are connected
- the state of coastal temperatures and plankton populations
are connected to larger issues like Pacific salmon populations,"
he said.
Scientists say animals along the Pacific Coast have managed
to overcome changing environmental conditions for many
years.
"All of these species are very long-lived,"
Parrish said. "They can die in big numbers for a
year or two without severe impact to the populations."
But, she cautioned, human activity could jeopardize the
survival of animals already stressed by environmental
changes.
"This, for instance, would be a truly bad year for
an oil spill." |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|