As many of you know,
Signs of the Times is not supported by major funding like
many other news sites, and is not affiliated with any
government, political group, corporation, or news agency.
SOTT is financed by any donations we receive as well as
money out of our own pockets. The benefit of this setup
is that we do not have any sponsors that might introduce
unwanted bias into our work. The
obvious and major drawback is that we do not have the
funding to do all the things we would like to do for our
readers.
Almost one year ago, SOTT created the P3nt4gon Str!ke presentation, which has now been viewed by
well over 300,000,000 people worldwide, and is available
in nine different languages. Recently, we wrote and produced
the song You
Lied, performed by Away
With the Fairys. We also recorded our first ever podcast,
beginning a project which we had been trying to get off
the ground for over a year.
A
SOTT editor poses next to his computer
To produce the Signs page, we work very long days (often
upwards of 14-16 hours) without pay. We do it because
we love it, and because our readers often write to tell
us how they have benefited from our work. In order to
continue expanding our work and deepen our analysis and
understanding of our world, we need to enlarge our library.
There are many books we would like to have that we cannot
afford. With our increasing use of sound files and our
future projects that include video, we have and will continue
to incur higher bandwidth costs. As well, the Signs page
and related projects are created on several computers
which are each upwards of five years old. They are very
slow, increasingly unreliable, and won't support regular
podcasts and videos.
Unfortunately, we do not have the financial means to
purchase the books we need, much less new equipment. Current
donations only support our basic needs and living expenses.
In order to continue producing the Signs page, the podcast,
Flash presentations, and expand our operations further,
we need your support.
At the moment, we are preparing six Signs of the
Times Commentary books. These books are collections
of SOTT commentary grouped according to theme. They will
be available for sale soon, and any proceeds will go towards
helping to cover our increasing operating costs.
Our target, based on estimated costs for all the necessary
materials, upgrades, and operating costs for the coming
year is 28,000 euros.
--
Here's How You Can Help Signs of the Times --
Any donation you
can make will help us to continue to produce and improve
the Signs page.
If you donate 50 euros
(approximately US$60; click
here for current exchange rate), you will be a Bronze
Supporter.
Bronze
Supporters will receive a complementary
copy of the 911 Conspiracy Signs
Commentary book.
If you donate 100
euros, you will be a Silver
Supporter.
Silver
Supporters will receive a complementary copy
of 911 Conspiracy, US Freedom, and The
Media.
Donations
of 175 euros will qualify you as a Gold
Supporter.
Gold
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work.
Donations of 250 euros will
qualify you as a Platinum Supporter.
Platinum
Supporters will receive the entire set of
six commentary books: 911 Conspiracy, The
Human Condition, The Media, Religion,
US Freedom, and The Work. In addition,
they will receive one other book of their choice free
from our bookstore.
We have more projects like our podcast in
the works - but we need your
help to make them a reality!
Thank
you in advance from the editors and the rest of the team
at Signs of the Times!
Are we truly responsible for
our own actions? One writer's exploration of 'parentalism'
-- the fear of personal freedom -- and learning how
to celebrate our choices, both good and bad.
I recently went out for a bout of activist carousing
with Ban the Ban, a group opposed to the District of
Columbia's proposed ban on smoking in bars and restaurants.
I had expected to see plenty of heated arguments about
the merits of the ban between smokers and non-smokers,
and I did. I had not expected to see non-smokers attacking
the ban on principle locked in debate with smokers who,
between languorous puffs and grey exhalations, welcomed
it as a means of reducing their own smoking.
If the argument--one I heard more than once from D.C.
barflies--sounds strange, it is not, at any rate, rare.
When New York City was mulling its own smoking ban,
one young "man on the street" interviewee
told the Village Voice: "I'd actually be all for
it, which is odd since I am a smoker myself. I think
it might make me smoke less. The increase in the cost
of a pack of cigarettes hasn't stopped me from smoking.
I just have friends who come up to visit from Florida
bring cartons for me."
If we ignore for a moment the morality of endorsing
a public restriction as a means to a personal self-help
project, this is in one sense a perfectly ordinary thought.
We are all, sometimes, afflicted with akrasia, those
attacks of weak will that lead us to satisfy fleeting
desires at the expense of our own acknowledged long-term
interests.
Like Ulysses lashed to the mast, we empty the pantry
of sweets, hire pricey personal trainers, join rehab
groups, or loudly announce an intention to start working
on that novel, knowing how embarrassed we'll feel if
there's no progress to report when a friend asks how
it's coming. Markets duly respond
to our demand for self-restraint: Virgin Mobile recently
introduced an anti-drunk dialing feature that allows
users embarking on a pub crawl to block themselves from
calling up that ex until the following morning.
There may even be ways for government to help us combat
akrasia without overly restricting our freedoms. In
his recent book The Ethics of Identity, philosopher
Kwame Anthony Appiah offers (as a thought experiment
more than a serious policy proposal) the example of
the "self management card." When we go shopping
for smokes or fatty foods or alcohol or a dose of heroin,
Appiah imagines, the store is required to swipe our
cards to ensure we haven't gone over a self-imposed
limit, set by logging on to a special website set up
for that purpose. An actual card of that sort would,
of course, be a privacy nightmare, but it shows that
attempts to help people make sound decisions need not
be paternalistic.
Normal and necessary as these akrasia-countering mechanisms
may be, though, they may also be symptoms of what Nobel
laureate economist James Buchanan has dubbed "parentalism."
Buchanan's term is not to be confused with paternalism,
the familiar idea that sometimes people--other people--need
to be restrained for their own protection from making
poor choices. (In some cases, as with children or the
severely mentally handicapped, this may well be right.)
Parentalism is in a sense more
insidious: It emerges when we begin to suspect that
we ourselves are not competent to make our own choices,
to yearn for someone to relieve us of the burden of
choice. As Buchanan puts it:
[Economists and political theorists] have assumed
that, other things being equal, persons want to be
at liberty to make their own choices, to be free from
coercion by others, including indirect coercion through
means of persuasion. They have failed to emphasize
sufficiently, and to examine the implications of,
the fact that liberty carries with it responsibility.
And it seems evident that many
persons do not want to shoulder the final responsibility
for their own actions..[They] want to be told what
to do and when to do it; they seek order rather than
uncertainty, and order comes at an opportunity cost
they seem willing to bear.
The thought is not novel to Buchanan. Jean-Paul Sartre
described the "anguish" that comes with our
realization that we are "condemned to be free."
Marxist psychologist Erich Fromm
diagnosed the totalitarian movements of the 20th century
as symptoms of an urge to "escape from freedom,"
from the displacement of a feudal world in which identities
were given--a place for everyone, and everyone in his
place--with a capitalist order that made who we were
and what we were to become seem dizzyingly contingent.
How much more true is that when the lodestones by which
we navigated that sea of choices--religious communities,
or localities with their own longstanding mores--are
themselves objects of choice on the market, in an increasingly
interconnected and mobile world that arrays communities
and faiths before us like so many cans of soup on a
Whole Foods shelf.
Contemporary theorists of choice paralysis sometimes
talk as though the problem with abundant freedom of
choice were merely that the cognitive demands of navigating
modern markets' plenitude are uncomfortably high. Yet
if that were so, then adaptive mechanisms to filter
our choices--and, as described above, winnow out some
of the tempting but destructive ones--would be the simple
solution.
For the true parentalist, though,
this will be unsatisfying, for the true parentalist
wants to escape not just the burdens of the act of choosing,
but the responsibility for making a poor choice.
Voluntary market mechanisms for filtering or restraining
choice will always, ultimately, have an escape clause:
We can fire the personal trainer or tell our friends
we've changed our minds about that diet or quitting
smoking after all. And, in the final analysis, they
allow us only to defer responsibility, not avoid it.
The expert I consulted may have given me bad advice,
yet I may still blame myself for a poor choice of experts.
There are plenty of practical problems with the parentalist
impulse. As economist Glen Whitman notes in a forthcoming
Cato Institute paper, we cannot assume we always help
people by giving preference to their "long term"
over their "short term" interests. Imagine
an aging man in ill-health lamenting his sybaritic youth.
We are tempted to say that his younger self, seeing
the pleasures immediately available to him and giving
short shrift to their long term consequences, exhibited
a foolish bias toward the present. But surely it's also
possible that his older self, faced with the proximate
pains and inconveniences of poor health, discounts the
pleasures past he'd have forsaken had he been more health-conscious.
If we're prone to the first form of cognitive bias,
why not the second?
Whitman also argues that, just as simple Pigovian taxes
on pollution may be less efficient than allowing market
negotiation to determine how much pollution will be
produced in what location, sin taxes, smoking bans,
and other parentalist attempts to spare our future selves
the costs of our present choices may displace a rich
variety of mechanisms for self-restraint that would
match the rich variety of risk profiles and time-discount
rates we find among members of a pluralistic society.
And as the young man interviewed by the Village Voice
demonstrated, we can be ingenious at outwitting imposed
restraints--even those we welcome in principle. We may
find ourselves running up bigger credit card bills to
buy more sin-taxed Twinkies and cigarettes, or traveling
inconvenient distances to find a smoke friendly bar.
But perhaps a more important
problem with parentalism is that it licenses what Sartre
called "bad faith," the attempt to avoid the
burdens of responsibility by denying our own freedom.
Classical liberals may even inadvertently encourage
this by speaking of responsibility as "the other
side" of freedom, as though it were the spinach
that had to be cleared away before getting to desert.
But is that really so?
When we make trivial choices--what to have for dinner,
what movie to see, which CD to buy--what we most value
is the freedom to select without constraint from many
options. Yet when it comes to our most central choices--what
kind of person am I to be, what work will I find rewarding?--we
may take as least as much satisfaction in the feeling
of responsibility for our choices, in knowing that we
have shaped a life that is ours even when we have chosen
badly.
Classical liberals have become good at explaining how
the market order they favor promotes freedom and happiness.
They have been less adept at
explaining why--at least past a certain point--people
ought to want that freedom, which when genuine is always
at least a little frightening. In the face of
the parentalist impulse, we may need to develop the
case that our bad choices, the choices that make us
unhappy, are as vital and precious as the ones that
bring us joy.
Julian Sanchez is an assistant editor at Reason.
He lives in Washington, D.C.
Comment: Reread
the following excerpt:
Marxist psychologist Erich Fromm
diagnosed the totalitarian movements of the 20th century
as symptoms of an urge to "escape from freedom,"
from the displacement of a feudal world in which identities
were given--a place for everyone, and everyone in
his place--with a capitalist order that made who we
were and what we were to become seem dizzyingly contingent.
Today, we see the inhabitants of many nations trying
to escape from freedom. While we often point out the
absurdity of the creeping fascism promoted in the war
on terror by our psychopathic leaders, the fact remains
that many people seem to want that very fascism
to bloom. The idea of terrorists crashing airliners
into buildings terrifies people. The idea of terrorists
bombing public transportation terrifies people. Losing
our material comforts terrifies people. The simple act
of dying terrifies people.
The simple solution - the one which requires no effort
on our part - is to go along with the implementation
of fascist governments. We think that our leaders wouldn't
lie to us, so we can trust them to protect us and our
families. If those governments believe that the removal
of civil liberties and the use of torture is what it
is going to take to keep us all safe, well so be it
- as long as we don't have to take responsibility. If
something goes wrong, we can blame the authorities.
"The torture of prisoners by US forces wasn't
my fault! I was lied to by the government!"
The problem is, it doesn't seem to work that way. If
we refuse to accept responsibility for our own actions
and choices, someone else will act and choose for us.
The refusal to make a choice and to allow Big Brother
to do all the work for us is an explicit statement that
we are handing over the responsibility to choose to
our leaders. In giving up our choice - our free will
- we are siding with our leaders. As such, we are just
as guilty of whatever crimes they commit because they
have acted in our name and with our explicit consent.
By Dominic Kennedy, Adam Luck
and Daniel McGrory
Times Online
July 26, 2005
DETECTIVES leading Britain's biggest
manhunt made a desperate plea for public help last night
as it emerged that there have been no sightings of the
four suicide bombers since they fled five days ago.
Police named two of the men and released new pictures.
Five people are being questioned but none is believed
to figure strongly in the investigation.
None of the four main suspects has been seen since
1.05pm on Thursday, minutes after the bungled attacks.
It emerged last night that the four attended Finsbury
Park mosque, North London and that two received benefits
to rent a council flat.
A Populus poll for The Times showed that 74 per cent
of the public believe that terrorist bombings and scares
are likely to be part of life in London in future. There
is support for deporting foreign Muslims who encourage
extremism while 70 per cent favour police powers to
hold terrorist suspects for up to 90 days without charge.
Police know that three of the bombers assembled at
Stockwell Underground station before 12.25pm last Thursday.
Scotland Yard released a remarkable photograph of an
unnamed suspect staring up as he stands on a Tube train
waiting for his bomb to blow up.
The device made a harmless pop like a champagne cork
before the train pulled into Oval station. At 12.35pm
the man ran towards the exit, pursued by members of
the public.
He ran towards the centre of Brixton, throwing away
his top with the "New York" logo in Gosling
Way, and was last seen in Tindall Street at 12.45pm.
Hundreds of officers have been checking the bombers'
known addresses and questioning associates.
Police believe that they are at a prearranged safe house
in London and fear that they could be preparing more
attacks.
Officers spent last night searching the flat at Curtis
House, a 13-storey block on a council estate in Bounds
Green, North London, used by two of the bombers.
Police believe that this is where the devices were
assembled. They were packed in clear plastic 6.25-litre
food canisters made in India, which are sold at only
100 outlets in Britain.
Scotland Yard named two of the suspects after previous
appeals for help drew a disappointing response.
They are the bus bomber, Muktar Said-Ibrahim, 27, thought
to be Eritrean and who also uses the name Muktar Mohammed-Said,
and Yasin Hassan Omar, a Somali, the Warren Street bomber.
Both are thought to be asylum-seekers.
Omar, who was last seen vaulting a barrier at Warren
Street station, has been the registered occupant of
the flat since 1999.
Ibrahim, who was last seen in Hackney Road, East London,
after his failed attempt to blow up a No 26 bus, shared
it with him for the past two years.
Omar, received £88 a week in housing benefit
to pay for the council property and also received income
support, immigration officials say. Police are close
to confirming the identity of the other two suspects
and are trying to discover whether any of them attended
any overseas training camps.
Officers were also understood last night to be interviewing
Ibrahim's father, who lives in Stanmore, North London.
Sammy Jones, a mother of two, said that she recognised
the men from photographs shown to her by detectives.
"The man who I now know is called Muktar used to
have a big bushy beard but he then shaved that off,"
she said.
Mrs Jones, 33, said that the
group were seen carrying heavy cardboard boxes into
Flat 58 on the ninth floor. Police are understood
to have removed a fridge, possibly used to store the
explosives.
Another neighbour, Vance Noor, 18, said that the bombers
used to play for a Sunday football team of fellow Somalis.
Comment: Oh
no! Not heavy cardboard boxes!! They could have contained...well...anything,
really.
BOSTON - A flight from Los Angeles
to London was diverted to Boston early Tuesday after
three Pakistani passengers were
reported acting suspiciously, but nothing amiss
was found and the three were released after questioning,
authorities said.
Comment: Maybe
they were carrying a heavy cardboard box?
Flight 934 landed at Logan International Airport at
2:52 a.m. The three Pakistani
citizens were taken into custody and questioned after
other passengers complained that they were moving about
the cabin, an FBI spokeswoman said.
Comment: Okay,
so far this week we have:
Don't run from the police
Don't wear baggy clothing
Don't keep anything large in
your pockets that could be mistaken for a bomb, a
boxcutter, or a nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic
missile
Don't carry heavy cardboard
boxes into your residence
When flying, never move about
the cabin
"Some of the individuals were
in first class and another was in coach," spokeswoman
Gail Marcinkiewicz said, and they were walking between
the two sections of the plane.
Comment: Gee,
do you think they might have been friends or relatives
who wanted to talk to each other? Nah! Terrorists, for
sure...
All three were later released and no
charges were filed, she said.
"It's all being resolved," she said.
The three passengers were cleared
to continue on to London's Heathrow Airport.
Flight 934 was to depart Logan around 11 a.m., airport
spokesman Phil Orlandella said.
Comment: What
a surprise... Actually, it is kind of surprising.
After all, the CIA could have just shipped them off
to Egypt to be tortured to death in order to save face.
He said police searched the aircraft
and found nothing suspicious.
State trooper Veronica Dalton said the three passengers
had been "acting suspiciously and making the passengers
nervous."
"The crew made the determination that they were
going to land the plane in Boston," she said.
The three passengers were not identified.
A call to a United Airlines spokesman was not immediately
returned.
Comment: It's
good to know that the fear conditioning is working as
planned...
Last Updated Mon, 25 Jul 2005
13:54:29 EDT
CBC News
An
Italian court has issued arrest warrants for six more
alleged CIA agents, accusing them of helping kidnap an
Egyptian Muslim cleric in 2003, a court official says.
In June, a judge issued warrants for 13 alleged CIA operatives,
but turned down the requests for six others accused of
involvement in the abduction of Osama Mustafa Hassan Nasr.
Prosecutors appealed last week.
On Monday, a three-judge panel in Milan granted the warrants,
a court official told the Associated Press, requesting
anonymity.
The prosecutors allege that CIA agents snatched the radical
cleric, also known as Abu Omar, from a Milan street in
February 2003 and sent him to Egypt, where he says he
was tortured.
The cleric was already being investigated in Italy as
part of a terrorism inquiry.
The abduction was reportedly part of the Central Intelligence
Agency's "extraordinary rendition" program that
transfers suspects without any court approval to a third
country, where they could be questioned and possibly tortured.
A report published in the Washington Post on June 30
said CIA chiefs in Rome briefed Italian officials prior
to the purported operation. Italian and American officials
agreed to deny any knowledge of the operation if it were
ever made public, said the report.
Italy's government has denied any knowledge of the alleged
operation.
Italian prosecutors have asked Interpol to help find
the suspects and are preparing extradition requests.
After the July 7 bombings, much was made of London's
defiance towards the terrorists. But today, following
another anxious week, the capital's mood seems less sure.
Can things ever return to normal, wonders Tim Dowling.
I can pretty well pinpoint
the moment when my own spirit of defiance started to fade.
It was on Saturday morning. I was with the dog in the
park opposite our house, chatting to a woman with a boxer
while watching two uniformed policeman comb the undergrowth.
It's not unusual to see police in Little Wormwood Scrubs;
the place has of late become something of a centre of
excellence for delinquents. It is unusual, however, to
be ordered to leave the area by a plainclothes officer
citing the presence of a suspicious device. It is strange
to watch the whole park being festooned in police tape,
to see cops with machine-guns and earpieces standing on
the corner. A huge security cordon was thrown up, with
our house inside it. At this point I was still feeling
rather reassured by what I assumed was a ridiculous, if
understandable, overreaction on the part of the police.
People set fire to stolen scooters in our park, but they
do not plants bombs there. We stood out on the front step
in order to see what was happening, only to be told by
a policeman that we must remain indoors. He was clearly
looking for a phrase to describe the seriousness of the
situation without telling us any more than he needed to.
The words he chose were: "It's got nails in." That was
when my defiance evaporated.
The spirit of the Blitz was invoked shortly after the
bombings of Thursday July 7, and it seemed to resonate
immediately. Those directly affected by the attacks -
the injured, the emergency services, the families of those
killed or hurt - did indeed behave with courageous stoicism,
and Londoners took a little reflected pride in their dignity.
Mayor Ken Livingstone, a divisive figure at the best of
times, made an emotional statement which perfectly captured
the mood of the capital, even though he was in Singapore.
"Londoners will not be divided by the cowardly attack,"
he said, his voice angry and raw. "They will stand together
in solidarity ... and that is why I'm proud to be the
mayor of that city."
The next day people made their way to work, an act that
was to become imbued with meaning. In different circumstances
a business-as-usual approach to such a tragedy might have
seemed callous, but those deeply affected by the bombings
and those who were merely inconvenienced (I count myself
firmly among the latter; I was in Paris) were united behind
the idea that getting on with life sent the terrorists
the right message. The buses filled up again. On Monday,
Livingstone took the tube to work as normal, elevating
the grim grind of the daily commute into a provocative
political statement.
At the same time, the hastily set-up website Werenotafraid.com
became a clearinghouse for various expressions of defiance,
an almost direct response to the terrorists' online claim
of responsibility, which asserted that "Britain is now
burning with fear". Some of the postings on werenotafraid.com
were moving, some were mawkish, a few strayed into reckless
bravado, but the overall tone was one of simple solidarity,
amplified by the huge number of respondents.
And in London things certainly seemed to be getting back
to normal. Tourist numbers began to recover. Some 20,000
people turned up to the National Gallery's Stubbs exhibition
last Wednesday. Despite stern warnings from the security
services about the possibility of more attacks, it seemed
like it would be a good long while before terrorists dared
to test our vigilance again.
The second attack changed all that. While the display
of defiance probably peaked at the impromptu street party
in Shepherds Bush Green, which was brought to a halt after
a bomb failed to go off on a nearby tube train, in retrospect
this seemed like a slightly giddy reaction to what turned
out to be an extremely close call. The
half-certainties we had let ourselves adopt were shattered.
We had hoped that Britain contained a fairly limited supply
of home-grown suicide bombers; it was even possible that
the first four had been tricked into sacrificing their
lives. We can discount that idea now.
Since Thursday, carrying on as
normal has become rather more difficult. No one was injured
in the attacks, but I know people in Shepherds Bush who
weren't allowed to go home for two days. In Kilburn, in
Tulse Hill and Stockwell - parts of London previously
enveloped in the safety of shaggy anonymity - residents
found the anti-terrorist operation had arrived on their
doorsteps. If most of us have thus far escaped
tragedy, few Londoners remain untouched by fear. On Friday,
the police shot an innocent Brazilian man in Stockwell
station, and the potential for disaster expanded. It's
not enough to spot terrorists on the tube, you must take
active steps to avoid looking like one. Watching events
unfold on television (interspersed with long, defiant
stretches of cricket) I had the sense of things getting
unpleasantly close to home, and that was before someone
left a nail bomb in the park where my children play. I
know this hardly compares to the Blitz, in which 43,000
Londoners perished, but I still find the idea of exhibiting
pluck in the circumstances oddly draining. I feel lucky,
but I don't feel plucky.
When Inter Milan tried to cancel its UK tour last week,
Livingstone's outraged response rang curiously hollow.
"The terrorists, I am sure, will be celebrating their
decision," he said. "We cannot allow the terrorists to
change the way we live or they will be very close to their
aim." Who in London hasn't changed the way they live,
or had it changed for them? I don't know about you, but
yesterday I had to go through a police checkpoint to buy
milk. People have stopped taking rucksacks out with them.
They've stopped riding on the top deck of the bus. When
it was first reported that bicycle sales had doubled in
the capital, the statistic was interpreted as a plucky
response to a badly damaged transport network - people
were getting to and from work any way they could - but
it may well turn out that a certain percentage of commuters
have forsaken the tube permanently.
On Sunday morning, we were woken by the muffled crump
of a controlled explosion. Although the bomb has been
taken away, as I write this the police are still here
and the park is still closed. I don't know whether I want
them to stay or not. For the moment
I live in unprecedented safety - a veritable gated community
- but I must admit I'm now afraid; afraid that another
attack is imminent, afraid of the idea of 3,000 armed
police on the streets, afraid that London will never quite
be the same again, afraid that my children will find out
how afraid I am (don't worry, they'll never read this
far). Carrying on as normal seems less politically freighted
than it did two weeks ago, not least because it's no longer
really possible, but you can't say that the terrorists
have won just because the cops won't let the postman deliver
my Amazon order.
'People even think pie-and-mash shops are a potential
target'.
Londoners recount the many small ways in which their lives
have been changed.
I haven't been into London since it happened. I'm not
going to for two years. That's enough time for it to calm
down. Rodney Odai, 17, sports science student
My great aunt - with whom I never speak - called me from
up north. She said, "Is everyone in the family still alive?"
I said, "Yes". She said, "Grand", and put the phone down.
Lisa Morgan, 31, legal secretary
I'm a cyclist and the roads are a lot more crowded. The
traffic's gone a bit mad. A friend of mine owns a bike
shop and he's advertising bikes on Thursday and they're
gone by Friday. Alex Constantina, 42, carpenter and joiner
We have been where we intended but we have kept away
from dark environments and we look for where your policemen
are. Mirko and partner, German tourists
An Indian friend of mine - English, but Indian parentage
- always carries a rucksack and won't use the tube now.
He says it's been the first time in years he's felt really
aware of his colour. Pippa Leech, social worker
This morning I travelled from Waterloo to Canary Wharf
in the rush hour with 10 days' worth of clothes in a large
rucksack. Nobody gave me a funny look or asked to search
my bag, but I felt very self-conscious. I didn't do what
I would normally do on the tube - abandon my bag at the
end of the line of seats and sit in the nearest free one.
Instead, I stood up for the five stops in order not to
cause panicky "Whose bag is this?" type questions - and
to avoid summary execution. I also find myself doing that
awful bien-pensant thing of smiling reassuringly at all
head-scarfed Muslims, so they know I don't blame them,
extending the patronising white woman's hand of friendship
across the racial and religious divide. Or something.
Grace Drummond, 30, doctor
I'm getting buses not tubes when travelling alone, getting
cabs if I'm in a group and regularly - almost too regularly
- checking the news. And I'm feeling irrational anger
with people who I feel aren't playing by the rules - playing
music loudly out of car stereos, shouting in the street
and generally being a non-specific nuisance. Alan, actor
I won't go in the front carriage of a tube train. Lisa McEvoy, 42
I'm doing my best to carry on exactly as before. From
what I've seen of people's reactions within London, they
are the ones who are most determined to carry on as normal,
whereas those who live outside London are the ones who
are most concerned - so, ironically, those most directly
affected are the most resilient, while those furthest
away seem to be most fearful. But that's typical of all
such scenarios - my brother spent five years living in
Jerusalem with little fear of attacks, while all those
outside the country assume it is a 24 hour warzone. Adam Hoffman, 31, investment banker
I went shopping in yucky Brent Cross rather than Oxford
Street today. I want my husband to leave in the morning
so he's at work by 8.30, whereas before I'd want him to
see the baby more in the morning as she's in bed when
he gets home. Emily Smith, 38, teacher
My housemate got off a train at London Bridge and took
a cab home last week as there was someone acting strangely
in his carriage. He was furious with himself, but what
can you do? Tom James
People even think that pie-and-mash shops are potential
targets. I had lunch in one in Greenwich and a builder
left his bag behind. People in the queue stopped talking
and looked at it. The builder came back 20 seconds later
looking red-faced. I heard people muttering, "Well, you
just don't know, do you?" and "You can't be too careful."
And that's a pie-and-mash shop. Ben Farey, 28, journalist
This morning, I found myself walking on the inside of
the pavement rather than on the roadside edge, to put
some distance between myself and the buses. How ridiculous
is that? Jennifer Stone, 30, stylist
· Interviews by Lucy Mangan
Comment:
The psychological effects of the bombs are seen here.
It is affecting people even if they don't want to be affected.
For some people, it may take another bomb, and yet another,
but the fear will come and settle. That is the goal of
the real "terrorists", the one's in power in
the US, in the UK, in Israel, to cow the population, to
prepare them for any sacrifice necessary for "security".
Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have thought about leaving
Britain after the London bombings, according to a new
Guardian/ICM poll.
The figure illustrates how widespread fears are of an
anti-Muslim backlash following the July 7 bombings which
were carried out by British born suicide bombers.
The poll also shows that tens of thousands of Muslims
have suffered from increased Islamophobia, with one in
five saying they or a family member have faced abuse or
hostility since the attacks.
Police have recorded more than 1,200
suspected Islamophobic incidents across the country ranging
from verbal abuse to one murder in the past three weeks.
The poll suggests the headline figure is a large underestimate.
The poll came as British Islamic leaders and police met
to try to boost recruitment of Muslim officers, improve
efforts to protect Muslims from a backlash, and improve
the flow of information from Muslims to the police about
suspected terrorist activity.
Nearly two-thirds of Muslims told pollsters
that they had thought about their future in Britain after
the attacks, with 63% saying they had considered whether
they wanted to remain in the UK. Older Muslims were more
uneasy about their future, with 67% of those 35 or over
having contemplated their future home country compared
to 61% among those 34 or under.
Britain's Muslim population is estimated at 1.6 million,
with 1.1 million over 18, meaning more than half a million
may have considered the possibility of leaving.
Three in 10 are pessimistic about their children's future
in Britain, while 56% said they were optimistic.
Nearly eight in 10 Muslims believe Britain's
participation in invading Iraq was a factor leading to
the bombings, compared to nearly two-thirds of all Britons
surveyed for the Guardian earlier this month. Tony Blair
has repeatedly denied such a link.
Muslim clerics' and leaders' failure to root out extremists
is a factor behind the attacks identified by 57% of Muslims,
compared to 68% of all Britons, and nearly two-thirds
of Muslims identify racist and Islamophobic behaviour
as a cause compared to 57% of all Britons.
The general population and Muslims apportion virtually
the same amount of blame to the bombers and their handlers,
with eight in 10 or more citing these as factors.
The poll finds a huge rejection of violence by Muslims
with nine in 10 believing it has no place in a political
struggle. Nearly nine out of 10 said they should help
the police tackle extremists in the Islamic communities
in Britain.
A small rump, potentially running into
thousands, told ICM of their support for the attacks on
July 7 which killed 56 and left hundreds wounded - and
5% said that more attacks would be justified. Those findings
are troubling for those urgently trying to assess the
pool of potential suicide bombers.
One in five polled said Muslim communities had integrated
with society too much already, while 40% said more was
needed and a third said the level was about right.
More than half wanted foreign Muslim clerics barred or
thrown out of Britain, but a very sizeable minority, 38%,
opposed that.
Half of Muslims thought that they needed to do more to
prevent extremists infiltrating their community.
· ICM interviewed a random sample of 1,005 adults
aged 18 by telephone on July 15-17 2005. Interviews were
conducted across the country and the results have been
weighted to the profile of all adults. ICM is a member
of the British Polling Council and abides by its rules.
Comment:
Talking about whether or not the bombings are related
to British involvement in the occupation of Iraq is difficult
because the assumption behind it is that it was "Islamic
terrorists" who planned and carried out the bombings.
So if you say yes, then you are falling into the trap
of believing the "Muslim = terrorist" lie. If
you answer "No, they aren't related", then you
fall into a trap because the polls don't hae a answer
"It was the intelligence service of one of three
countries: the US, the UK, or Israel". And the bombings
are related to the war in Iraq because it is part of an
international campaign of terror being unleashed upon
the Muslin world and now the Western world by the real
power that guides the planet towards ever greater chaos.
But we somehow doubt that there is a question or answer
on the poll sheet that touches this aspect.
The polls exist to shape public opinion. The questions
they ask and the answers they permit define the issues.
They can even create an issue by asking a poll about it
in order to plant it into people's minds.
LONDON, July 25 (AFP)
- Britain and France are to co-operate more closely on
anti-terrorism following the London bombings, exchanging
names of suspected Islamic extremists and other information,
the countries' prime ministers said Monday.
"I think there was a great deal of common ground
both in how we analyse and perceive this problem and also
how we can best deal with it," British Prime Minister
Tony Blair said following talks with French counterpart
Dominique de Villepin.
The world was facing "difficult times", the
French prime minister told a joint press conference at
Downing Street with Blair.
France stood together with Britain following the July
7 London bombings in which 56 people died, and a botched
follow up attack last Thursday, he added.
"I want to express to you, Tony, and to all the
British people, the solidarity and the friendship of the
French people," Villepin told reporters.
One part of the co-operation would be to "exchange
the names of people we believe, in either of our countries,
have been trying to incite or foment this type of extremism,"
Blair said.
Additionally, telecommunications records would be kept
for longer and the countries would swap data on protecting
vulnerable targets such as public transport and on combating
radicalisation among young Muslims
British police are desperately hunting for four men --
two of whom they named on Monday -- suspected of trying
to blow up three London subway trains and a bus on Thursday.
The men fled after their rucksack-carried bombs appeared
to not detonate fully, causing no injuries.
"There will be people who know information about
those that have participated or we believed have participated
in this attack...," Blair said.
"There will be people who know something. It's part
of our duty in order to protect our country that people
come forward and give the police the information that
they can," he said.
JERUSALEM, July 25
(AFP) - Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon will look
to open a new chapter in frequently troubled ties with
France during a visit to Paris this week, with President
Jacques Chirac eager to help advance Middle East peace.
Relations have been blighted by past Israeli claims that
Paris is pro-Palestinian and France anti-Semitic, and
most recently by French medical care given to the late
Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat before his death.
But Sharon aides were confident Monday that oil was being
poured on troubled waters.
In what will be his first meeting with the French president
in four years, Sharon's stay in Paris from Tuesday to
Friday heralds a better dawn just weeks before Israel
is to end its occupation of the Gaza Strip.
One aide was sufficiently upbeat to talk about "fresh
air blowing through the Elysee", even going so far
as to welcome "a much more active French role in
solving the (Israeli-Palestinian) conflict".
"The time has come to turn a new chapter with Paris...
We want to strengthen bilateral relations," said
the official.
Improvements have been brewing since the March visit
by Jean-Pierre Raffarin, when the then French prime minister
called for both countries to "breathe new life"
into their relationship.
It is a far cry from a July 2004 nadir when Sharon encouraged
French Jews to flee "the wildest anti-Semitism".
An icy Chirac said the Israeli premier was not welcome
in France until Paris received an explanation.
Faced with a ban and speculation that he was merely trying
to sideline a country often seen as sympathetic to the
Palestinians, Sharon has since hailed Chirac's efforts
to combat anti-Semitism as an example to others.
Tensions lingered on until later in the year when Israel
criticised the French welcome and send-off laid on for
Arafat who was rushed to a top Paris hospital for treatment
before his death last November.
"France is no longer seen as the most hostile European
country to Israel," said political analyst Akiva
Eldar.
Instead he said such dubious honour has passed to Ireland,
which officials saw as unduly critical during its rotating
EU presidency last year.
In France, Chirac used an interview last week with Israel's
leading liberal newspaper, Haaretz, to hail Sharon's "courageous"
decision to disengage from the Gaza Strip and France's
"strong relationship" with the Jewish state.
"In welcoming the prime minister to Paris, France
sends a message of confidence to its friend, the conviction
that peace is possible and the willingness to contribute,"
Chirac was quoted as saying.
Israel also welcomed the French- and US-sponsored UN
Security Council resolution 1559 that called for the departure
of all foreign troops, namely Syrian, and the disarming
of militias groups, namely Hezbollah, in neighbouring
Lebanon.
The Jewish state has also been publicly appreciative
of an unequivocal denunciation by the French government
of anti-Semitism in France.
A senior official at the Israeli foreign ministry said
this week's visit would coincide with the publication
of a French report detailing a dramatic drop in instances
of anti-Semitism.
"Sharon is very sensitive about needing to recognise
and thank Chirac's accomplishments on this matter,"
said the source close to Sharon.
Meanwhile the French interior ministry said that attacks
and insults directed at Jewish targets in France fell
by nearly 50 percent over the last year.
In the six months to June, 290 anti-Semitic acts were
recorded in France compared with 561 in the same period
in 2004 -- for a drop of 48.31 percent, the ministry said.
However three youths were arrested after bottles of acid
were thrown against the wall of a Jewish school in Paris
on Saturday, police said.
"There is no such thing as an anti-Semitic or racist
act of minor importance. Whether it is a word or a gesture,
whether or not there are victims, it is always serious,"
Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said on a visit to the
scene Monday.
FAIRFIELD, Ohio - Vandals tore
American flags out of the yard of a dead soldier's family
the day after his funeral, then set a car on fire, authorities
said.
Army Pfc. Tim Hines died July 14 of complications of
injuries he suffered last month in a roadside bombing
in Baghdad. His funeral was Friday.
On Saturday, someone pulled the flags out of the family's
yard, stuffed them under a car in the driveway and set
the whole thing on fire. Firefighters doused the blaze
and no one was injured, but the car was destroyed.
No arrests had been made by early Tuesday. Authorities
offered a $5,000 reward for tips.
"As we get into this, we feel it was more of a
crime of opportunity as opposed to a planned act,"
Police Chief Mike Dickey told CNN Tuesday morning.
Lt. Ken Colburn, a police spokesman, said authorities
hope "that anyone stupid enough to do something
like this will be stupid enough to talk about it and
someone else will come forward."
Neighbors bought the family new flags. "I went
by later that morning, Saturday morning, and there must
have been 200 flags that had been brought in and reposted,"
Dickey said.
The car belonged to the sister-in-law of Hines. Fairfield
is in Butler County, 13 miles north of Cincinnati.
BAGHDAD - Sunni Arabs ended their
boycott of a panel drafting
Iraq's constitution as a Baghdad newspaper published
an early draft of the charter suggesting Islam will
play a key role in the country's basic law.
Sunni Arabs said they could return to work on the constitution
as early as Tuesday after ending a boycott called in
protest at the killing of two of their colleagues last
week.
Iraqi government leaders Monday agreed to several of
their demands -- including allowing them to monitor
a judicial investigation into the murders -- in an effort
to get them back on board ahead of an August 1 deadline
for the committee to hand over the draft to parliament.
The boycott had threatened to derail the constitutional
talks and undermine their credibility with Iraq's Sunni
minority which accounts for about one-fifth of the 27-million
population.
The community, dominant under Saddam Hussein's regime
and all previous Iraqi governments, is also under-represented
in parliament as many of them boycotted the January
elections.
Meanwhile, the Iraqi section of Al-Qaeda slammed as
un-Islamic the drafting of Iraq's constitution.
"Drawing up the constitution is the worst of the
initiatives against Islam," said a statement put
out by an Islamist website.
"To say that the elections are the best solution
to save Sunnis from the current crisis is an unfounded
lie," said an unauthenticated statement from the
judicial commission of Al-Qaeda's Iraq branch.
The government mouthpiece, Al-Sabah, published what
it described as an early draft of the proposed constitution
which specifies that: "Islam
is the official religion of the State" and "the
main source of legislation".
"No law that contradicts the
universally agreed tenets of Islam may be enacted,"
specifies the draft text, which is still under discussion.
The draft's article 11 asserts that "fundamentalist"
and "terrorist" ideology will be banned, along
with the former Baath party of ousted dictator Saddam
Hussein.
Under the current transitional legislation,
put in place by US forces in March 2004, Islam was to
be considered only "a source of legislation",
and laws could not contradict "the principles of
democracy" and civil rights.
But there was no reference in the new draft to having
to take account of democracy or civil rights.
The Iraqi parliament is due to vote on a draft constitution
by August 15, before it is put to a national referendum
in October.
The present draft specifies that while "Islam
defines the identity of the Iraqi people ... other religions
must be respected".
"The Iraqi state belongs to two worlds -- Arab
and Muslim," the draft also says, to take account
of the non-Arab Kurdish minority.
Arabic is to be the country's official language, while
Kurdish and Arabic will be the official languages spoken
in the Kurdish north of the country and the two official
languages used by the federal administration.
The name of the state would either be the "Republic
of Iraq", or "Islamic Republic of Iraq"
or "Federal Republic of Iraq", according to
the draft.
Meanwhile, Polish Prime Minister Marek Belka and several
of his ministers visited Baghdad Tuesday for talks with
Iraqi premier Ibrahim Jaafari.
Poland has the third largest military
contingent in the US-led coalition in Iraq, with 1,400
troops and commands a multinational force of around
4,000.
Belka's visit comes a day after Australian
Prime Minister John Howard made a surprise landing in
the Iraqi capital and promised to keep the 900 Australian
soldiers in Iraq as long as Baghdad needed them.
In a violent incident late Monday, Pakistani truck
driver Farman Allah was killed when his truck hit a
roadside bomb near Balad, north of Baghdad, police said.
BAGHDAD - Visiting Polish Prime
Minister Marek Belka said his country was determined
to keep its military contingent of around 1,400 troops
in Iraq.
"We are determined to maintain our military contingent
in Iraq," Belka told reporters in Baghdad after
meeting with Iraqi premier Ibrahim Jaafari.
He said in the future troops might focus on training
missions, once stability returns to the war-torn country.
"The characterisation of the military may change
from the present stabilisation mission to a training
mission," he said.
Poland has the third largest contingent in the US-led
coalition, with 1,400 troops in Iraq, and commands a
multinational force of some 4,000.
Jaafari, who also addressed reporters, said he wanted
Polish forces to stay in Iraq.
"We emphasised the need for Polish forces to be
here ... to train our forces though we are progressing
in handling security in various provinces without help
from the multinational forces," Jaafari said.
Belka, who is accompanied by a Polish
ministerial delegation, said his talks also touched
on bilateral issues, including "economic development"
of Iraq and other defence-related issues.
"We in Poland know what challenges are ahead in
Iraq and we are proud to contribute (to the) stabilisation
of Iraq," Belka said.
"We are determined to participate
in the economic development of Iraq and our meeting
today was mostly devoted to this issue."
He said the two leaders discussed a need to set up
a mechanism between the two countries' defence ministries.
"As far as weapon sales or purchases
are concerned, we discussed how our defence ministries
can exchange information and coordinate and clear up
any misunderstandings that may happen in inter-state
relations," Belka added.
"We discussed a need to set up a mechanism between
the two ministries to clear up any problems that may
appear."
There have been reports of trouble involving the recent
sale of Polish helicopters to Iraq.
Jaafari said he briefed Balek on the previous military
contracts that Iraq had with Poland under ousted dictator
Saddam Hussein.
"We also asked Poland to help support our services
sector," the Iraqi premier said.
Belka said the two also discussed debt-related issues.
"We would not like to bring up this issue as Poland
is in the middle of an electoral campaign, but we will
recommend to the upcoming government to help Iraq as
per international standards," he said.
Pope Benedict has yet to address the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict
BBC
Monday, 25 July, 2005, 18:01 GMT 19:01 UK
Israel has summoned the Vatican's
ambassador to explain why the Pope left the country
off a list of those recently hit by terrorism.
Pope Benedict XVI on Sunday deplored attacks in "countries
including Egypt, Turkey, Iraq and Britain".
Israel said he had failed to mention a 12 July suicide
bombing in Netanya that killed five Israelis.
The foreign ministry said it would be interpreted as
"granting legitimacy to... terrorist attacks against
Jews".
"We expected that the new Pope, who on taking
office emphasised the importance he places on relations
between the Church and the Jewish people, would behave
differently," the ministry said in a statement.
The Vatican embassy declined to comment.
Pope Benedict has accepted an invitation to visit Israel
but has yet to comment on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
in public since taking office in April.
Less than a week after President
Bush chose a little-known federal appeals judge for
the Supreme Court, nominee John Roberts can claim favorability
ratings that many politicians would savor.
Bush strategist Karl Rove might envy them, too.
A USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup Poll taken Friday through Sunday
finds that 51% of Americans expect "a major fight"
over Roberts in the Senate. But by 59% to 22%, those
surveyed say he should be confirmed for the job.
Roberts' favorable-unfavorable ratings are a muscular
46%-13%; 19% haven't heard of him.
In contrast, by 34% to 25%,
Americans have an unfavorable view of Rove;25%
have never heard of him. Seen by many as Bush's
most powerful White House adviser, Rove has been in
the news lately because of an investigation into whether
administration officials illegally leaked the name of
a CIA operative to reporters.
The controversy hasn't gripped the public's attention.
Just half of those surveyed say they are following the
story closely; one in five aren't following it at all.
Even so, 25% think Rove broke the law in the case.
An additional 37% suspect that he did something unethical
but not illegal. Just 15% say they think he didn't do
anything seriously wrong.
Those surveyed are split almost evenly, 40%-39%, over
whether Bush should fire him. By 49% to 31%, a plurality
says he should resign. [...]
By JESSE J. HOLLAND
Associated Press
Tue Jul 26, 2:25 AM ET
WASHINGTON - The White House won't
release documents that Supreme Court nominee John Roberts
prepared while working in the solicitor general's office
from 1989-1993, even if senators who will judge his
nomination request them, a senior administration official
said.
Some documents from Roberts' work for two previous
Republican presidents were being released Tuesday by
the National Archives, and at the urging of Senate Judiciary
Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the White House was asking
the Reagan presidential library to expedite the review
of other Roberts records to determine what can be released.
But the White House will claim privilege for the work
Roberts performed while serving as principal deputy
solicitor general in the administration of former President
George H.W. Bush.
"The Department of Justice will retain the confidentiality
of those internal memos," said the official, who
was not authorized to speak on the record.
With President Bush's first chance to shape the Supreme
Court at stake, the White House is hoping to avoid the
kind of showdown with Democrats over document requests
that has stymied Senate confirmation of some of the
president's other high-profile nominees.
Asked repeatedly to say whether the administration
was open to making Roberts' writings as a former administration
lawyer available, White House press secretary Scott
McClellan avoided saying "no" outright on
Monday.
"We want to work with the members of the Senate
to make sure that they have the appropriate information
so that they can do their job," McClellan said.
The documents issue could be critical as the Senate
prepares to decide whether to confirm Roberts as Bush's
replacement for retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
The documents being released Tuesday were from Roberts'
tenure as special assistant to Attorney General William
French Smith during the Reagan administration. For the
first President Bush, Roberts held a key position in
the solicitor general's office, which argues cases before
the Supreme Court on behalf of the administration.
Some of Roberts' records already are publicly available
at the Reagan library. Others still need clearance from
representatives of the current president and former
administrations, as required by law, and archivists.
Democrats have offered no indication that they plan
an all-out battle against Roberts. But since his two-year
tenure on the federal bench has left him with a limited
public record, they have hinted they may seek memos,
briefs and other documents he wrote while working for
Reagan and the first President Bush to shed more light
on his stands on such issues as abortion, the environment
and federal jurisdiction.
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., one of the centrists
who stopped an earlier Senate fight over Bush's judicial
nominees, urged the White House to be flexible with
document requests.
"I'd hate to see us get into a battle over whether
the administration was going to share documents instead
of the basic question of is Judge Roberts deserving
of confirmation to be a justice of the United States
Supreme Court," Lieberman said Monday after meeting
with the nominee.
No Democrats have said publicly they will fight the
Roberts nomination. But Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., last
week called for the White House to release all of Roberts'
working papers from his time during the Reagan and George
H.W. Bush years.
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee have not
yet revealed which documents they will ask for. Sen.
Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., suggested Monday she didn't
think his solicitor general memos would be very important
"unless it relates to confirming something that
becomes a major question."
Sen. Patrick Leahy, top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee,
said material written in confidence while serving in
an administration has been provided in the past - for
instance by Reagan when he nominated William H. Rehnquist
for chief justice.
The Senate's majority Republicans are expected to support
the White House's decision. "I don't think it is
appropriate for a lawyer to release documents they've
produced for their clients," Sen. Sam Brownback,
R-Kan., said Monday.
By LIZ SIDOTI
Associated Press
Mon Jul 25,11:29 PM ET
WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans
pushed ahead Monday with legislation that would set
rules for the treatment and interrogation of terrorism
suspects in U.S. custody, despite a White House veto
threat.
The Bush administration, led by Vice
President Dick Cheney, is working to kill the amendments
that GOP Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham
of South Carolina want to tack onto a bill setting Defense
Department policy for next year.
McCain, a former prisoner of war in Vietnam, and Graham,
who spent 20 years as an Air Force lawyer, introduced
the legislation Monday.
Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Warner,
R-Va., has endorsed the effort.
"What we're trying to do here is make sure there
are clear and exact standards set for interrogation
of prisoners," McCain said on the Senate floor.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., shot back, "I reject
the idea that this Defense Department and our Army and
our military is out of control, is confused about what
their powers and duties and responsibilities are."
Republicans said the measures were not toned down even
though White House lobbying against them intensified
late last week.
Cheney met with the three Republican lawmakers just
off the Senate floor for about 30 minutes Thursday evening
to object to detainee legislation. McCain
said the meeting was the second in as many weeks between
Cheney and top Armed Services members over administration
concerns about the defense bill.
The administration said in a statement last week that
President Bush's advisers would recommend a veto of
the overall bill if amendments were added that restricted
the president's ability to conduct the war on terrorism
and protect Americans.
"They don't think congressional
involvement is necessary," McCain said in an interview.
Senate aides estimate that nearly a dozen Republicans
could be on board - which would be more than enough
for the amendments to pass if Democrats support them
as well.
Democrats have long criticized the administration on
detainee treatment and have put forth their own amendments,
including one by Sen. Carl Levin, the top Democrat on
Armed Services, that would set up an independent commission
to review detention and interrogation practices.
The White House opposes it, and Senate Republicans
say they are pushing their detainee legislation in part
as an alternative to the creation of such an independent
panel.
"I think it's important to those who want to consider
that commission to see that some members are taking
very affirmative steps" on the detainee issue,
Warner told reporters.
Talk of legislation regulating U.S. treatment of terror
suspects has percolated on Capitol Hill since last year,
when the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal in Iraq surfaced.
But the effort by leading Republicans to standardize
treatment of terror suspects has gained steam over the
past few months. Criticism by human-rights groups and
lawmakers over the military's detainee camp in Guantanamo
Bay, Cuba, reached a fever pitch this spring amid fresh
allegations of abuse and torture there.
One of McCain's amendments would make interrogation
techniques outlined in the Army field manual - and any
future versions of it - the standard for treatment of
all detainees in the Defense Department's custody. The
United States also would have to register all detainees
in Defense Department facilities with the Red Cross
to ensure all are accounted for.
Warner introduced a watered-down version
of McCain's amendment that would give the defense secretary
the authority to set standardized rules over detention
and interrogation of terror suspects, but he denied
that he offered the alternative because of administration
pressure.
Another McCain amendment would expressly
prohibit cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment of
prisoners in U.S. custody no matter where they are held.
Graham's amendment would define
"enemy combatant" and put into law the procedures
the Bush administration already has in place for prosecuting
detainees at Guantanamo. That framework includes
the existance of military tribunals to determine who
qualifies as an "enemy combatant" and parole-like
boards to judge annually whether detainees continue
to pose threats to the United States.
The amendment would, in effect, provide
a congressional stamp of approval to the Bush administration's
legal policies, including those for holding detainees
indefinitely.
"This legitimizes what the courts have been telling
us to do," Graham said.
McCain's amendments have the support of 14 retired
military officers, including former Rep. Douglas "Pete"
Peterson, D-Fla., a Vietnam veteran and prisoner of
war.
Comment: Historically,
Bush and gang haven't needed Congress' approval to do
anything, but it seems they're going to get it anyway.
It's fascism and it's perfectly legal, just like in
Nazi Germany.
Conspiracy theories implicating president aired at 8-hour
hearing
By Bob Kemper
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:13:37 -0700
The eight-hour hearing, timed
to mark the first anniversary of the release of the
Sept. 11 commission's report on the attacks, drew dozens
of contrarians and conspiracy theorists who suggest
President Bush purposely ignored warnings or may even
have had a hand in the attack - claims participants
said the commission ignored.
Washington - Revisiting the issue that helped spur her
ouster from Congress three years ago, Rep. Cynthia McKinney
led a Capitol Hill hearing Friday on whether the Bush
administration was involved in the terrorist attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001.
The eight-hour hearing, timed to mark the first anniversary
of the release of the Sept. 11 commission's report on
the attacks, drew dozens of contrarians and conspiracy
theorists who suggest President Bush purposely ignored
warnings or may even have had a hand in the attack -
claims participants said the commission ignored.
"The commission's report
was not a rush to judgment, it was a rush to exoneration,"
said John Judge, a member of McKinney's staff and
a representative of a Web site dedicated to raising
questions about the Sept. 11 commission's report.
The White House and the commission have dismissed such
questions as unfounded conspiracy theories.
McKinney first raised questions about Bush's involvement
shortly after the attacks in New York, Washington and
Pennsylvania, generating a furious response from fellow
Democrats in Washington and voters in Georgia, who ousted
her in 2002.
"What we are doing is asking
the unanswered questions of the 9/11 families,"
McKinney, a DeKalb County Democrat who won back her
seat in 2004, said during the proceedings.
She rebuffed a reporter's repeated attempts to ask
her why she would so boldly embrace the same claims
that led to her downfall.
"Congresswoman McKinney is viewed
as a contrarian," panelist Melvin Goodman, a former
CIA official, said. "And I hope someday her views
will be considered conventional wisdom."
Though she left the testimony and questioning of panelists
to others, McKinney was the main attraction, presiding
over more than two dozen participants, including
the author of a book that claims the U.S. government
had advance knowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack and
allowed it to happen, and Peter Dale Scott, who
wrote three books on President John F. Kennedy's assassination.
Georgia peanuts, Cokes and coffee were available to
more than 50 attendees, whose casual dress was a decided
change from the gangs of blue-suited lobbyists who usually
crowd Capitol Hill hearings.
McKinney herself offered witnesses bottled water and
found additional trash cans to place around the room.
Nearly a dozen 9/11 enthusiasts lined one side of the
room, camcorders at the ready, broadcasting the hearing
live over the Internet or recording it for later release.
C-SPAN cameras documented the hearing, and a DVD recording
of the proceedings will soon be available.
Ten peoplesat
in a section reserved for family members of 9/11 victims.
"Nine-eleven could have been prevented,"
said Marilyn Rosenthal, a University of Michigan professor
who lost a son in the attacks, echoing the premise of
the hearing.
Panelists maintained that Bush ignored numerous warnings
from the CIA, the Federal Aviation Administration, foreign
governments and others who told him before 9/11 that
Osama bin Laden was planning to attack the United States
and that terrorists were likely to use hijacked airliners
as weapons.
But why would the president or his
administration want the 9/11 attacks to occur? Power,
the panelists agreed.
In the wake of the attacks,
the administration was able to greatly expand the president's
power and the reach of the federal government,
they said, but whistle-blowers and other potential witnesses
who could have testified to the Sept. 11 commission
about such things were either prevented from speaking
or ignored in the commission's final report. Panelists
called the commission's report "a cover-up."
"The American people have been
seriously misled," said Scott.
McCarthy-style witch hunts are
coming back, and the first place we'll be seeing them
is at Pennsylvania's public colleges and universities.
Under the innocent-sounding name "Academic
Bill of Rights," a gaggle of right-wing "culture
warriors" in the Republican-led Pennsylvania House
recently passed HR 177, a resolution authorizing them
to invade public colleges and universities armed with
subpoenas to grill faculty on curricula, reading lists,
exams, homework assignments, grading and teaching styles,
and to take testimony from students, allegedly to determine
whether their professors are fair or "biased."
The underlying assumption of the resolution--part
of a nationwide campaign spearheaded by one-time SDS
lefty and now rabid right-wing activist David Horowitz--is
that America's colleges and universities have been overrun
by leftist fanatics intent on banishing conservative
ideas and punishing conservative or Christian students
who dare to speak out.
The notion that leftists are
in charge in academia, is as bogus as the notion that
the media are dominated by liberals. The political
mix on most campus faculties across the country is not
much different from what you'd find in the broader community.
Moreover, leftist teachers are no more likely to impose
their ideas on students or to punish those who disagree
than are rightists (maybe less), and in either case
such behavior should and would likely be roundly condemned.
(Any decent school has a mechanism for students to challenge
political bias by a professor, and indeed Horowitz
and his minions have been hard-pressed to show any hard
evidence of such abuses.) Add to this the reality
that at the higher you look in university administrations,
through chairs to deans and provosts on up to presidents,
the more conservative officials tend to be politically.
At Pennsylvania's Temple University, for example, the
University Senate voted resoundingly to oppose HR177
as a threat to academic freedom and free speech, yet
the university president, David Adamany-technically
an ex-officio member of the Senate--was quoted publicly
as not seeing anything troubling about the legislative
intrusion into academic affairs.
In my own limited experience
in academia (which has included teaching at Alfred
University, a small liberal arts institution, Ithaca
College, a rather mainstream private institution with
an emphasis on the arts, and Ivy League Cornell University),
being overtly on the left was
seen as a bit edgy, and perhaps even dangerous to one's
tenure aspirations.
The Horowitzniks and Pennsylvania's HR177 backers also
misunderstand, or deliberately misrepresent, the role
of a university professor, particularly in the liberal
arts fields like literature, political science, philosophy,
sociology, etc., which is where their attention is focused.
University teaching, unlike elementary
and high school instruction, should not be so much a
"covering of the field" as an introduction
to the idea of self-instruction and independent thinking.
At its best, a college course should teach students
how to pursue knowledge on their own, how to research
and express their own ideas, and how to defend and,
as needed, amend or even reject those ideas on the basis
of free intellectual debate.
There is nothing wrong with having a teacher who presents
a point of view, as long as that teacher is honest about
it, and open to challenge. My favorite teachers when
I was an undergraduate in the late '60s were precisely
those professors who held strong views with which I
disagreed vehemently, because they forced me to clarify
my own thinking and to defend my own contrarian positions.
What Howoritz and the HR177 resolution backers seek
is a bland, neutral academy where everyone keeps her
or his ideas to her or himself. By bringing a legislative
inquisition to campus, these people are really pursuing
an agenda of intimidation and conformity, hoping to
silence those in academe who may hold views out of synch
with the national consensus. I taught once at a school
that was like that: Fudan University in the People's
Republic of China.
Pennsylvania is the first state
where they've succeeded in passing a version of Howoritz's
insidious redbaiting legislation. The anti-intellectual
crew in Harrisburg was aided in its efforts by a state
media that ignored their campaign until the measure
had already passed. Pennsylvania's main newspaper,
the Philadelphia Inquirer, ran no reports on House hearings
on the resolution or even on the final vote. In fact,
the Inquirer's first mention of the resolution-run after
the measure had already passed--was an op-ed rant by
a right-wing Penn State education professor who claimed,
with no supporting evidence, that the state's public
higher education institutions were under the tyrannical
grip of minority and feminist professors.
In the 1950s, academics were attacked
by Sen. Joe McCarthy and a gang of right-wing zealots
who equated liberals and free thinkers with Communist
fifth columnists and hounded many honorable teachers
out of their jobs. Most Americans now recall that era
in embarrassment. Horowitz and a bunch of right-wing
legislative yahoos in Harrisburg, PA seem hell-bent
on reviving that anti-intellectual witch-hunt.
Comment: The
fact that Horowitz is pushing for penalties for those
university professors who aren't conservative enough
is obvious evidence that he does not seek a balance,
but rather the implementation of a new form of McCarthyism
that associates "liberals" with "terrorists".
In true psychopathic fashion, he is accusing his opponents
of committing the very acts that he himself is promoting.
HAVANA, July 25 (Xinhuanet)
-- Only 13 percent of eligible voters in Haiti have registered
for the country's general elections due at the end of
this year, official reports reaching here said on Monday.
To date, only 600,000 people have signed up for the
vote, out of a total of 4.5 million eligible voters, due
to the prevailing violence in large cities across Haiti,
the reports said.
The low percentage of registrations has made the Haitian
acting government consider the possibility of extending
until September the deadline for registrations, originally
scheduled for completion by August 9.
However, sympathizers of ex-president Jean-Bertrand
Aristide, who is living in exile in South Africa after
being ousted in 2004, said many citizens are not interested
in voting.
Since the ouster of Aristide, over 1,000 people have
died due to violence and clashes between police and followers
of Aristide.
Former ruling Lavalas Party has refused to participate
in the elections unless Aristide is allowed to return
to Haiti before the elections.
In spite of the existing chaos, Gerard Latortue, acting
prime minister of Haiti, said that the elections will
take place in October or November as planned.
Comment:
Ever since the US-backed coup in Haiti that overthrw the
democratically elected Aristide, you don't hear much about
Haiti in the mainstream news: the deaths of Aristide supporters,
the dire poverty. Remember this figure of how many Haitians
are registered to vote when the media circus procleims
that democracy has been restored there.
STOCKHOLM, July 25
(Xinhuanet) -- Deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who
faces trial on charges of crimes against humanity, will
not be permitted to stand trial or serve his sentence
in Sweden, Radio Sweden reported on Monday.
An official from the justice ministry said that Sweden
has turned down a request by one of Hussein's lawyers
for him to come here, and for the time being, Swedish
authorities were unlikely to change their minds.
"We have said 'no'," justice ministry director
Ann Marie Bolin Pennegaard said, referring to a request
from one of Hussein's lawyers for him to either await
trial, stand trial or serve his sentence in Sweden.
Pennegaard has sent the Swedish government's answer
to Hussein's attorney Giovanni di Stefano, according to
Radio Sweden.
"Sweden has no intention of filing a request to
the competent authorities in Iraq for a transfer of Saddam
Hussein to Sweden before his trial," Pennegaard said.
Giovanni di Stefano has said that Iraq's insurgency
has made Baghdad far too dangerous a venue for the former
leader's trial, and that the proceeding should be moved
to another country.
"Baghdad couldn't even prevent the recent kidnapping
and killing of the Egyptian ambassador. There are also
many Iraqis whowant to see Saddam executed and many others
who want to see him freed. That means the defense and
prosecution would both be in danger there," di Stefano
said.
He said Saddam's defense team has contacted the Swedish
government about the possibility of holding such a trial
in Sweden
NEW YORK, July 25
(Xinhuanet) --A day after two terror scares caused disruptions
at Penn Station and Times Square, a suspicious package
in downtown Brooklyn led to some real tense moment Monday.
Eyewitnesses say a black canvas attach case was found
chained to a fire hydrant at the corner of Montague and
Court streets across from Borough Hall Monday morning,
and a police bomb unit was immediately called in to investigate
the package.
An officer with the New York Police Department said
the case was detonated by the bomb squad, and witnesses
reported hearing what sounded like firecrackers and seeing
smoke. However, police will not confirm the bag was exploded.
Law enforcement officials would only say the bag contained
personal belongings.
According to people who work in the area, several buildings
along Court Street were evacuated and a nearby court house
was cordoned off while the investigation was being conducted.
Subway service was also temporarily shut down at the Court
Street station.
The incident comes just one day after there was a large
police response to two separate terror scares in Times
Square and at PennStation Sunday that turned out to be
false alarms.
In the first event, a man put a suitcase on the counter
of the station and claimed he had a bomb inside. The bomb
threat forced the evacuation of the station, the Amtrak,
commuter rails and subway trains were all stopped for
about an hour.
Prosecutors said on Monday that the man, identified
as Raul Claudio of the Bronx, was arraigned on charges
of making a terrorist threat and falsely reporting an
incident.
In another instance, police swarmed a double-decker
tour bus inTimes Square when its driver reported that
several passengers withbackpacks on board were acting
suspiciously.
The passengers were all checked out, and the men in
question were handcuffed, but no threat was found and
the men were released.
WASHINGTON, July 25
(Xinhuanet) -- A young US soldier admitted on Monday that
he was guilty of killing an Iraqi officer two years ago
in Iraq and had tried to cover up the case by injuring
himself.
Dustin Berg, a member of the Indiana National Guard,
told the court at the military base of Fort Knox, Kentucky,
that he felt guilty about shooting Hussein Kamel Hadi
Dawood al-Zubeidi, a Iraqi security officer while they
were on patrol together in November 2003.
A young US soldier Dustin Berg is facing court martial
July 25 in the fatal shooting of an Iraqi police officer.
Berg admitted that he shot the Iraqi officer, but said
the November 2003 shooting was in self-defense.
The 22-year old corporal is facing a 18-month jail term
and will be expelled by the Army for bad conduct.
In earlier investigations of the case, Berg had insisted
that he shot Zubeidi in self defense, saying the Iraqi
had pointed a rifle towards him and warned him not to
report insurgent activities to the superiors.
In a hearing in May, the US soldier said he thought
his life was threatened by Zubeidi at the time and denied
any wrongdoing.
But on Monday, Berg pleaded guilty, admitting that he
had invented the whole story and may have "acted
too quickly".
After killing the Iraqi officer, Berg confessed, he
shot himself with the dead man's rifle in an attempt to
cover up the crime.
He was then sent to a hospital and was even awarded
a Purple Heart medal from the military for "heroic
acts" in Iraq.
Eventually, prosecutors found loopholes in his story
and began the investigation.
The case is the latest of over a dozen court-martials
of US soldiers for killing innocent Iraqis.
So far, at least eight US soldiers have been convicted
or have pleaded guilty to charges related to deaths of
Iraqis.
CAIRO, July 26 (Xinhuanet)
-- A third group on Tuesday claimed in an Internet statement
deadly bombings that rocked the Egyptian Red Sea resort
of Sharm el-Sheikh.
The group, calling itself Egyptian Tawhid and Jihad,
said the attacks were in response to US military operations
in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Three bombings hit a luxury hotel and a shopping area
in Sharm el-Sheikh last Saturday, killing at least 64
people and injuring more than 100.
Soon after the attacks, an al-Qaida linked group claimed
responsibility in an Internet statement. The group, calling
itself the al-Qaida Organization in the Levant and Egypt,
said the attacks were against "crimes committed against
Muslims."
A second militant group, Mujahedeen Egypt, said it had
carried out the attacks to drive Jews and Christians out
of the country.
The authenticity of all three claims could not be verified.
Comment:
More proof those Muslim terrorists are just plain crazy.
They can't even get straight which of them were responsible.
In case you haven't the least idea
what the heck it means for China to "float"
its currency, let me put it in the language we economists
use: China's float don't mean squat.
Yet our President, a guy whose marks in Economics 101
are too embarrassing to publish here, ran out to hail
the fact that buying Chinese money will now cost more
dollars.
The White House line to the media,
swallowed whole, is that by making Chinese money (yuan)
more expensive to buy with dollars, Americans will buy
fewer computers and toys from China - and US employment
will rise.
This will happen when we find Saddam's
Weapons of Mass Destruction.
Economics Lesson #1:
You can't change the value of goods by changing the
value of the currency on the price tag. As my comrade
Art Laffer wrote me, "If cheap currency makes your
products more competitive, all automobiles would be
made in Russia." Driven a Lada lately?
Economics Lesson #2:
Don't take economics lessons from George Bush. Or Milton
Friedman. Or Thomas Friedman. What that means, class,
is don't believe the big, hot pile of hype that China's
zooming economy is the result of that Red nation's adopting
free market economic policies.
If China is now a capitalist free-market state, then
I'm Mariah Carey. China's economy has soared because
it stubbornly refused the Free and Friedman-Market mumbo-jumbo
that government should stop controlling, owning and
regulating the industry.
China's announcement that it
would raise the cost of the yuan covered over a more
important notice: China would bar foreign control of
its steel sector. China's leaders have built
a powerhouse steel industry larger than ours by directing
the funding, output, location and ownership of all factories.
And rather than "freeing" the industry through
opening their borders to foreign competition, the Chinese,
for steel and every other product, have shut their borders
tight to foreigners except as it suits China's own industries.
China won't join NAFTA or CAFTA or any of those free-trade
clubs. In China, Chinese industry comes first. And it's
still, Mssrs. Friedman, the Peoples' republic. Those
Wal-Mart fashion designs called, chillingly, "New
Order," are made in factories owned by the PLA,
the Chinese Peoples' Liberation Army.
In an interview just before he won the Nobel Prize
in economics, Joe Stiglitz explained to me that China's
huge financial surge - a stunning 9.5% jump in GDP this
year - began with the government's funding and nurturing
rural cooperatives, fledgling agricultural and industry
protected behind high, high trade barriers.
It is true that China's growth got a boost from ending
the bloodsoaked self-flagellating madness of Mao's Cultural
Revolution. And China, when it chooses, makes use of
markets and market pricing to distribute resources.
The truth is, Chinese markets are as free as my kids:
they can do whatever they want unless I say they can't.
Yes, China is adopting elements of "capitalism."
And that's the ugly part: real estate speculation in
Shanghai making millionaires of Communist party boss
relatives and bank shenanigans worthy of a Neil Bush.
It is not the Guangdong skyscrapers and speculative
bubble which allows China to sell us $162 billion more
goods a year than we sell them. It is that China's government,
by rejecting free-market fundamentalism, can easily
conquer American markets where protection is now deemed
passé.
And that is why the yuan has kicked the dollar's butt.
America's only response is to have
Alan Greenspan push up real interest rates so we can
buy back our own dollars the Chinese won in the export
game. The domestic result: US wages drifting down to
Mexican maquiladora levels.
Am I praising China? Forget about it. This is one evil
dictatorship which jails union organizers and beats,
shackles and tortures those who don't kowtow to the
wishes of Chairman Rob - Wal-Mart chief Robson Walton.
(Funny how Mr. Bush never mentions the D-word, Democracy,
to our Chinese suppliers.)
Class dismissed.
GNN contributor Greg Palast, winner of the Financial
Times David Thomas Prize for his writings on regulation,
is author of The New York Times bestseller, The Best
Democracy Money Can Buy. Read and watch his interview
with Nobelist Joseph Stiglitz for BBC Television at
www.GregPalast.com.
Flu viruses can swap
many genes rapidly to make new resistant strains, US researchers
have found.
Scientists previously believed that gene swapping progressed
gradually from season to season.
The National Institutes of Health team found instead,
influenza A exchanged several genes at once, causing sudden
and major changes to the virus.
The findings in PLOS Biology suggest strains could vary
widely each season, making it potentially harder to treat.
Sudden mutations
They also increase concerns about bird flu mutating to
spread readily between humans.
Each year, experts must predict which strains will be
most common and design new vaccines to fight them.
Dr David Lipman and colleagues looked at strains of influenza
A that had circulated between 1999 and 2004 in New York.
These strains had given rise to the so-called Fujian
strain H3N2 that caused a troublesome outbreak in the
2003-2004 flu season because the vaccine made that winter
was a poor match for the virus.
Dr Lipman's team found wide variations in the 156 strains
that they analysed.
Some of the strains had at least four gene swaps that
had occurred in a short time period.
"The genetic diversity of influenza A virus is therefore
not as restricted as previously suggested," said
the researchers.
This suggests that scientists need to study circulating
flu viruses more carefully because important mutations
can occur suddenly and without warning, they said.
Threat of an outbreak
Scientists have been particularly worried recently about
avian flu mutating and acquiring the ability to spread
from human to human.
If it does, it could kill millions worldwide.
Last week, the UK government announced it would stockpile
two million doses of vaccine to combat the H5N1 strain
of bird flu currently circulating in Asia to protect key
medical and emergency workers across Britain against a
possible global pandemic.
Dr Maria Zambon, flu expert at the Health Protection
Agency said: "This research confirms the genetic
diversity of influenza viruses and underscores potential
for reassortment."
BEIJING (AP) - Of
the 80 people infected with a pig-borne disease in southwestern
China in the past month, nearly a quarter have died and
another 17 are in critical condition, the Health Ministry
said Tuesday.
At least 19 people are now known to have died in Sichuan
province, the ministry said. None of the infections was
transmitted through human-human contact, it said. Victims
of the disease suffer high fever, bleeding under the skin
and poisoning-related shock, the ministry said.
"According to research and lab test results, experts
believe the disease is caused by streptococcus suis,"
a disease commonly carried by pigs, the ministry said
in a statement. "People were infected because they
slaughtered and processed sick and dead pigs."
The deaths sparked fears of another outbreak of SARS
or avian flu, or of a new sickness emerging from China's
south, which has been the breeding ground for diseases
that jump between animals and humans because of their
close proximity.
The latest infections were spread throughout 75 villages
and 40 towns near the cities of Ziyang and Neijiang, the
ministry said.
"We are looking at not just a bacteria being active
in one herd of pigs but over a fairly wide area, with
isolated villages," said Bob Dietz, a spokesman for
the World Health Organization's regional office in Manila.
"Gathering information in that sort of situation
is difficult."
While China has been open with information on the outbreak
so far, WHO was keeping watch on the situation.
"We see this as a serious situation which bears
close monitoring," Dietz said. "This is a disconcertingly
high mortality rate."
China and Hong Kong have seen similar outbreaks in the
past but the scales were unknown because surveillance
systems weren't as active before, he said.
"Our review of the literature says this appears
to be bigger than in the past," Dietz said.
Government officials have been "destroying infected
pigs, eradicating contagious channels and treating patients,"
the China Daily newspaper said.
Farmers have been forbidden to slaughter and process
infected pigs, the Health Ministry said.
State television showed masked doctors at a hospital
examining patients who were on intravenous drips.
On Tuesday, health officials in Sichuan wouldn't release
details about the outbreak beyond confirming the number
of dead and sick.
A woman who answered the telephone at the Ziyang No.1
People's Hospital, where most of the patients were being
treated, said they were not allowed to speak to the media.
China was criticized during its outbreak of severe acute
respiratory disease for its slow response to pleas for
information. The epidemic killed nearly 800 people worldwide
before subsiding in July 2003.
The government is also trying to contain an outbreak
of avian flu in its west, where thousands of migratory
birds have died in recent weeks.
(AP) - A large swath
of the U.S. suffered through another miserable day of
sizzling temperatures and steamy humidity Monday - a deadly
heat wave that had people cranking up air conditioners,
scrambling to cooling shelters and running through sprinklers
in the park.
Temperatures neared 40 C in several cities, and the National
Weather Service posted excessive heat warnings and advisories
from Illinois to Louisiana and from Nebraska to the District
of Columbia.
"It feels like basically just walking around in
an oven," said 20-year-old McDarren Paschal as he
mowed grass at Sinclair Community College in Dayton, Ohio.
The heat has caused numerous deaths. In the Phoenix area
alone, 24 people, most of them homeless, have died.
City workers in Chicago checked on elderly residents
and shuttled people to cooling centres Monday, hoping
to avoid a repeat of a disastrous 1995 heat wave that
killed 700 people. Wilmington, Del., set up sprinklers
in city parks so people could run through the spray to
cool off. A social service agency in Oklahoma City handed
out fans to elderly people who didn't have air conditioning.
Sherri Ball went to a cooling centre in Peoria, Ill.,
because her window air conditioner couldn't keep up with
the heat, a day after the mercury hit 38 C in the central
Illinois city for the first time in a decade.
"It's hot and I can't breathe when it's real hot
outside," said the 46-year-old Ball.
In other states, at least three deaths have been blamed
on the heat in Missouri this summer, and authorities were
looking into the death of a woman found Sunday in a home
without air conditioning. Four people have died of the
heat in Oklahoma, two of them young children left in cars,
and at least three heat deaths have been tallied in New
Jersey.
Some 200 cities in the West hit daily record highs last
week, including Las Vegas, Nev., at 117, and Death Valley
soared to 129, the weather service said.
A break in the heat was on the way, at least for the
Midwest.
A cold front brought rain Monday to parts of Iowa, Minnesota
and Wisconsin, and was on its way to crossing Illinois,
Missouri and Indiana on Tuesday, said Ed Shimmon, a weather
service meteorologist in Lincoln, Ill. He said rainfall
will likely be scattered, but still welcome in the drought-stricken
region.
Demand for electricity to run air conditioners has hit
near-record peaks from Southern California to the region
served by the Tennessee Valley Authority. The load on
generators caused a power outage in St. Louis County,
Ill., where more than 900 customers were still without
electricity Monday.
It may also have been
used to knap, or split, flints
A sculpted and polished phallus found in a German cave
is among the earliest representations of male sexuality
ever uncovered, researchers say.
The 20cm-long, 3cm-wide stone object, which is dated
to be about 28,000 years old, was buried in the famous
Hohle Fels Cave near Ulm in the Swabian Jura.
The prehistoric "tool" was reassembled from
14 fragments of siltstone.
Its life size suggests it may well have been used as
a sex aid by its Ice Age makers, scientists report.
"In addition to being a symbolic representation
of male genitalia, it was also at times used for knapping
flints," explained Professor Nicholas Conard, from
the department of Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology,
at Tübingen University.
"There are some areas where it has some very typical
scars from that," he told the BBC News website.
Researchers believe the object's distinctive form and
etched rings around one end mean there can be little doubt
as to its symbolic nature.
"It's highly polished; it's clearly recognisable,"
said Professor Conard.
The Tübingen team working Hohle Fels already had
13 fractured parts of the phallus in storage, but it was
only with the discovery of a 14th fragment last year that
the team was able finally to put the "jigsaw"
together.
The different stone sections were all recovered from
a well-dated ash layer in the cave complex associated
with the activities of modern humans (not their pre-historic
"cousins", the Neanderthals).
The dig site is one of the most remarkable in central
Europe. Hohle Fels stands more than 500m above sea level
in the Ach River Valley and has produced thousands of
Upper Palaeolithic items.
Some have been truly exquisite in their sophistication
and detail, such as a 30,000-year-old avian figurine crafted
from mammoth ivory. It is believed to be one of the earliest
representations of a bird in the archaeological record.
There are other stone objects known to science that are
obviously phallic symbols and are slightly older - from
France and Morocco, of particular note. But to have any
representation of male genitalia from this time period
is highly unusual.
"Female representations with highly accentuated
sexual attributes are very well documented at many sites,
but male representations are very, very rare," explained
Professor Conard.
Current evidence indicates that the Swabian Jura of southwestern
Germany was one of the central regions of cultural innovation
after the arrival of modern humans in Europe some 40,000
years ago.
The Hohle Fels phallus will go on show at Blaubeuren
prehistoric museum in an exhibition called Ice Art - Clearly
Male.
MIAMI - Tropical Storm Franklin
was continuing its slow, erratic path toward Bermuda
early Tuesday.
A tropical storm watch was issued for the western Atlantic
islands, where forecasters said Franklin could drop
2 to 4 inches of rain.
"The erratic motion is not unusual for a weak
and small tropical storm that is not very well organized,"
said Richard Knabb, a hurricane specialist at the
National Hurricane Center in Miami.
Franklin also could soon weaken to a tropical depression,
Knabb said.
At 5 a.m., the storm was about 200 miles west-southwest
of Bermuda, crawling north-northeast at 5 mph with top
sustained winds near 40 mph.
Tropical storms have top sustained winds of at least
39 mph.
On Monday, the National Hurricane Center discontinued
advisories on the former Tropical Storm Gert, which
had faded to a tropical depression as it moved over
Mexico.
Vardan Kushnir, notorious for sending
spam to each and every citizen of Russia who appeared
to have an e-mail, was found dead in his Moscow apartment
on Sunday, Interfax reported Monday. He died after suffering
repeated blows to the head.
Kushnir, 35, headed the English learning centers the
Center for American English, the New York English Centre
and the Centre for Spoken English, all known to have
aggressive Internet advertising policies in which millions
of e-mails were sent every day.
In the past angry Internet users have targeted the
American English centre by publishing the Center's telephone
numbers anywhere on the Web to provoke telephone calls.
The Center's telephone was advertised as a contact number
for cheap sex services, or bargain real estate sales.
Another attack involved hundreds of people making phone
calls to the American English Center and sending it
numerous e-mails back, but Vardan Kushnir remained sure
of his right to spam, saying it was what e-mails were
for.
Under Russian law, spamming is not considered illegal,
although lawmakers are working on legal projects that
could protect Russian Internet users like they do in
Europe and the U.S.
A moderate earthquake occurred
at 04:08:35 (UTC) on Tuesday, July 26, 2005. The magnitude
5.6 event has been located in WESTERN MONTANA. (This
event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)