|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Fundamentalist
Christianity and Torture: A Long and 'FruitFul' Relationship
Even as the young
Afghan man was dying before them, his American jailers
continued to torment him.
The prisoner, a slight, 22-year-old taxi driver known
only as Dilawar, was hauled from his cell at the detention
center in Bagram, Afghanistan, at around 2 a.m. to answer
questions about a rocket attack on an American base.
When he arrived in the interrogation room, an interpreter
who was present said, his legs were bouncing uncontrollably
in the plastic chair and his hands were numb. He had
been chained by the wrists to the top of his cell for
much of the previous four days.
Mr. Dilawar asked for a drink of water, and one of
the two interrogators, Specialist Joshua R. Claus, 21,
picked up a large plastic bottle. But first he punched
a hole in the bottom, the interpreter said, so as the
prisoner fumbled weakly with the cap, the water poured
out over his orange prison scrubs. The soldier then
grabbed the bottle back and began squirting the water
forcefully into Mr. Dilawar's face.
"Come on, drink!" the interpreter said Specialist
Claus had shouted, as the prisoner gagged on the spray.
"Drink!"
At the interrogators' behest, a guard tried to force
the young man to his knees. But his legs, which had
been pummeled by guards for several days, could no longer
bend. An interrogator told Mr. Dilawar that he could
see a doctor after they finished with him. When he was
finally sent back to his cell, though, the guards were
instructed only to chain the prisoner back to the ceiling.
"Leave him up," one of the guards quoted
Specialist Claus as saying.
Several hours passed before an emergency
room doctor finally saw Mr. Dilawar. By then he was
dead, his body beginning to stiffen. It would be many
months before Army investigators learned a final horrific
detail: Most of the interrogators
had believed Mr. Dilawar was an innocent man who simply
drove his taxi past the American base at the wrong time.
The story of Mr. Dilawar's brutal death at the Bagram
Collection Point - and that of another detainee, Habibullah,
who died there six days earlier in December 2002 - emerge
from a nearly 2,000-page confidential file of the Army's
criminal investigation into the case, a copy of which
was obtained by The New York Times.
Like a narrative counterpart to the digital images
from Abu Ghraib, the Bagram file depicts young, poorly
trained soldiers in repeated incidents of abuse. The
harsh treatment, which has resulted in criminal charges
against seven soldiers, went well beyond the two deaths.
In some instances, testimony shows, it was directed
or carried out by interrogators to extract information.
In others, it was punishment meted out by military police
guards. Sometimes, the torment
seems to have been driven by little more than boredom
or cruelty, or both.
In sworn statements to Army investigators, soldiers
describe one female interrogator with a taste for humiliation
stepping on the neck of one prostrate detainee and kicking
another in the genitals. They tell of a shackled prisoner
being forced to roll back and forth on the floor of
a cell, kissing the boots of his two interrogators as
he went. Yet another prisoner is made to pick plastic
bottle caps out of a drum mixed with excrement and water
as part of a strategy to soften him up for questioning.
The Times obtained a copy of the file from a person
involved in the investigation who was critical of the
methods used at Bagram and the military's response to
the deaths.
Although incidents of prisoner abuse at Bagram in 2002,
including some details of the two men's deaths, have
been previously reported, American officials have characterized
them as isolated problems that were thoroughly investigated.
And many of the officers and soldiers interviewed in
the Dilawar investigation said the large majority of
detainees at Bagram were compliant and reasonably well
treated.
"What we have learned through the course of all
these investigations is that there were people who clearly
violated anyone's standard for humane treatment,"
said the Pentagon's chief spokesman, Larry Di Rita.
"We're finding some cases that were not close calls."
Yet the Bagram file includes ample testimony that harsh
treatment by some interrogators was routine and that
guards could strike shackled detainees with virtual
impunity. Prisoners considered important or troublesome
were also handcuffed and chained to the ceilings and
doors of their cells, sometimes for long periods, an
action Army prosecutors recently classified as criminal
assault.
Some of the mistreatment was quite obvious, the file
suggests. Senior officers frequently toured the detention
center, and several of them acknowledged seeing prisoners
chained up for punishment or to deprive them of sleep.
Shortly before the two deaths, observers from the International
Committee of the Red Cross specifically complained to
the military authorities at Bagram about the shackling
of prisoners in "fixed positions," documents
show.
Even though military investigators
learned soon after Mr. Dilawar's death that he had been
abused by at least two interrogators, the Army's criminal
inquiry moved slowly. Meanwhile, many of the
Bagram interrogators, led by the same operations officer,
Capt. Carolyn A. Wood, were redeployed to Iraq and in
July 2003 took charge of interrogations at the Abu Ghraib
prison. According to a high-level Army inquiry last
year, Captain Wood applied techniques there that were
"remarkably similar" to those used at Bagram.
Last October, the Army's Criminal Investigation Command
concluded that there was probable cause to charge 27
officers and enlisted personnel with criminal offenses
in the Dilawar case ranging from dereliction of duty
to maiming and involuntary manslaughter. Fifteen of
the same soldiers were also cited for probable criminal
responsibility in the Habibullah case.
So far, only the seven soldiers have been charged,
including four last week. No one has been convicted
in either death. Two Army interrogators were also reprimanded,
a military spokesman said. Most of those who could still
face legal action have denied wrongdoing, either in
statements to investigators or in comments to a reporter.
"The whole situation is unfair," Sgt. Selena
M. Salcedo, a former Bagram interrogator who was charged
with assaulting Mr. Dilawar, dereliction of duty and
lying to investigators, said in a telephone interview.
"It's all going to come out when everything is
said and done."
With most of the legal action pending, the story of
abuses at Bagram remains incomplete. But documents and
interviews reveal a striking disparity between the findings
of Army investigators and what military officials said
in the aftermath of the deaths.
Military spokesmen maintained
that both men had died of natural causes, even after
military coroners had ruled the deaths homicides.
Two months after those autopsies,
the American commander in Afghanistan, then-Lt. Gen.
Daniel K. McNeill, said he had no indication that abuse
by soldiers had contributed to the two deaths. The methods
used at Bagram, he said, were "in accordance with
what is generally accepted as interrogation techniques."
The Interrogators
In the summer of 2002, the military detention center
at Bagram, about 40 miles north of Kabul, stood as a
hulking reminder of the Americans' improvised hold over
Afghanistan.
Built by the Soviets as an aircraft machine shop for
the operations base they established after their intervention
in the country in 1979, the building had survived the
ensuing wars as a battered relic - a long, squat, concrete
block with rusted metal sheets where the windows had
once been.
Retrofitted with five large wire pens and a half dozen
plywood isolation cells, the building became the Bagram
Collection Point, a clearinghouse for prisoners captured
in Afghanistan and elsewhere. The B.C.P., as soldiers
called it, typically held between 40 and 80 detainees
while they were interrogated and screened for possible
shipment to the Pentagon's longer-term detention center
at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
The new interrogation unit that arrived in July 2002
had been improvised as well. Captain Wood, then a 32-year-old
lieutenant, came with 13 soldiers from the 525th Military
Intelligence Brigade at Fort Bragg, N.C.; six Arabic-speaking
reservists were added from the Utah National Guard.
Part of the new group, which was consolidated under
Company A of the 519th Military Intelligence Battalion,
was made up of counterintelligence specialists with
no background in interrogation. Only two of the soldiers
had ever questioned actual prisoners.
What specialized training the unit received came on
the job, in sessions with two interrogators who had
worked in the prison for a few months. "There was
nothing that prepared us for running an interrogation
operation" like the one at Bagram, the noncommissioned
officer in charge of the interrogators, Staff Sgt. Steven
W. Loring, later told investigators.
Nor were the rules of engagement very clear. The platoon
had the standard interrogations guide, Army Field Manual
34-52, and an order from the secretary of defense, Donald
H. Rumsfeld, to treat prisoners "humanely,"
and when possible, in accordance with the Geneva Conventions.
But with President Bush's final determination in February
2002 that the Conventions did not apply to the conflict
with Al Qaeda and that Taliban fighters would not be
accorded the rights of prisoners of war,
the interrogators believed they "could deviate
slightly from the rules," said one of the Utah
reservists, Sgt. James A. Leahy. [...]
|
I pledge allegiance to the flag, of the United
States of America and the Republic for which it stands.
ONE NATION UNDER GOD, indivisible with liberty and
justice for all!
~ Pledge of Allegiance
"One nation under God". Contained in this
oft-repeated, slavishy-hypnotizing and semantically-loaded
phrase are two of the most pervasive and insidious programs
that infect the minds of most American citizens, as
well as pretty much every other person around the globe,
since the day we were born.
Nationality and Religion; the currency of politicians,
priests and psychopaths; the shackles which mentally
bind us to limiting and divisive belief systems. They
are conditioned programs, largely responsible for the
madness and chaos which has become the reality of our
world.
"For God and Country". That which separates"us"
from "them". That which creates the "other",
our enemies, lesser, sub-human, expendable. These ideas
which drive us to maim, rape, torture and kill. Filled
with the self-righteousness of our own delusional narcissism,
we inflict unspeakable horrors upon our brethren, because
we only see differences based on illusions and lies.
We are blind to the truth.
The cycle continues, passed on from generation to generation.
The blood of our ancestors that once stained the battlefield
now flows in our veins. And above it all, the power-brokers
lord over us, unafflicted by reason, empathy and conscience.
They gleefully plant these ideas of God and Country
in our minds, our hearts, our culture. There is no escape
from the lies of this world.
Each of us has a choice to make.
To continue to believe in the lies of Nationality and
Religion, to believe that we are somehow "special"
because we were born in a certain place, or that our
God's skin is a different colour than our enemies' God's
skin. To continue to participate in the horrors of this
third density reality with it's physical trappings of
fear, sex and hunger.
Or to stop. To SEE what is real. That our enemy lives
within us, inside our minds, in our programs and belief
systems. This is the choice that we all must make, the
choice that separates the wheat from the chaff. The
choice to throw off the chains of illusion and see what's
real.
To continue to act as if we are somehow special or
"chosen" by virtue of where we live or what
we believe is to propagate the lies of nationality and
religion and ultimately add to the horror and chaos
so prevalent in the world today.
To sit on the fence is no choice at all.
So, which side are you on? |
I cannot get out of my mind the
recent news photos of ordinary Americans sitting on
chairs, guns on laps, standing unofficial guard on the
Arizona border, to make sure no Mexicans cross over
into the United States. There was something horrifying
in the realization that, in this twenty-first century
of what we call "civilization," we have carved
up what we claim is one world into 200 artificially
created entities we call "nations" and armed
to apprehend or kill anyone who crosses a boundary.
Is not nationalism--that devotion
to a flag, an anthem, a boundary so fierce it engenders
mass murder--one of the great evils of our time, along
with racism, along with religious hatred? These
ways of thinking--cultivated, nurtured, indoctrinated
from childhood on--have been useful to those in power,
and deadly for those out of power.
National spirit can be benign in a country that is
small and lacking both in military power and a hunger
for expansion (Switzerland, Norway, Costa Rica, and
many more). But in a nation like ours--huge, possessing
thousands of weapons of mass destruction--what
might have been harmless pride becomes an arrogant nationalism
dangerous to others and to ourselves.
Our citizenry has been brought up to see our nation
as different from others, an exception in the world,
uniquely moral, expanding into other lands in order
to bring civilization, liberty, democracy.
That self-deception started early. When the first
English settlers moved into Indian land in Massachusetts
Bay and were resisted, the violence escalated into war
with the Pequot Indians. The
killing of Indians was seen as approved by God, the
taking of land as commanded by the Bible. The Puritans
cited one of the Psalms, which says: "Ask of me,
and I shall give thee, the heathen for thine inheritance,
and the uttermost parts of the Earth for thy possession."
When the English set fire to a Pequot village and
massacred men, women, and children, the Puritan theologian
Cotton Mather said: "It was supposed that no less
than 600 Pequot souls were brought down to hell that
day."
It was our "Manifest Destiny to overspread the
continent allotted by Providence," an American
journalist declared on the eve of the Mexican War. After
the invasion of Mexico began, the New York Herald announced:
"We believe it is a part of our destiny to civilize
that beautiful country."
It was always supposedly for benign purposes that
our country went to war. We invaded Cuba in 1898 to
liberate the Cubans, and went to war in the Philippines
shortly after, as President McKinley put it, "to
civilize and Christianize" the Filipino people.
As our armies were committing massacres in the Philippines
(at least 600,000 Filipinos died in a few years of conflict),
Elihu Root, our Secretary of War, was saying: "The
American soldier is different from all other soldiers
of all other countries since the war began. He is the
advance guard of liberty and justice, of law and order,
and of peace and happiness."
Nationalism is given a special virulence when it is
blessed by Providence. Today we have a President, invading
two countries in four years, who believes he gets messages
from God. Our culture is permeated by a Christian fundamentalism
as poisonous as that of Cotton Mather. It permits the
mass murder of "the other" with the same confidence
as it accepts the death penalty for individuals convicted
of crimes. A Supreme Court justice, Antonin Scalia,
told an audience at the University of Chicago Divinity
School, speaking of capital punishment: "For the
believing Christian, death is no big deal."
How many times have we heard Bush and Rumsfeld talk
to the troops in Iraq, victims themselves, but also
perpetrators of the deaths of thousands of Iraqis, telling
them that if they die, if they return without arms or
legs, or blinded, it is for "liberty," for
"democracy"?
Nationalist super-patriotism is not confined to Republicans.
When Richard Hofstadter analyzed American presidents
in his book The American Political Tradition, he found
that Democratic leaders as well
as Republicans, liberals as well as conservatives, invaded
other countries, sought to expand U.S. power across
the globe.
Liberal imperialists have been among the most fervent
of expansionists, more effective in their claim to moral
rectitude precisely because they are liberal on issues
other than foreign policy. Theodore Roosevelt, a lover
of war, and an enthusiastic supporter of the war in
Spain and the conquest of the Philippines, is still
seen as a Progressive because he supported certain domestic
reforms and was concerned with the national environment.
Indeed, he ran as President on the Progressive ticket
in 1912.
Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, was the epitome of the
liberal apologist for violent actions abroad. In April
of 1914, he ordered the bombardment of the Mexican coast,
and the occupation of the city of Vera Cruz, in retaliation
for the arrest of several U.S. sailors. He sent Marines
into Haiti in 1915, killing thousands of Haitians who
resisted, beginning a long military occupation of that
tiny country. He sent Marines to occupy the Dominican
Republic in 1916. And, after running in 1916 on a platform
of peace, he brought the nation into the slaughter that
was taking place in Europe in World War I, saying it
was a war to "make the world safe for democracy."
In our time, it was the liberal Bill Clinton who sent
bombers over Baghdad as soon as he came into office,
who first raised the specter of "weapons of mass
destruction" as a justification for a series of
bombing attacks on Iraq. Liberals today criticize George
Bush's unilateralism. But it was Clinton's Secretary
of State, Madeleine Albright, who told the United Nations
Security Council that the U.S. would act "multilaterally
when we can, unilaterally when we must."
One of the effects of nationalist
thinking is a loss of a sense of proportion. The killing
of 2,300 people at Pearl Harbor becomes the justification
for killing 240,000 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The killing
of 3,000 people on September 11 becomes the justification
for killing tens of thousands of people in Afghanistan
and Iraq.
What makes our nation immune from the normal standards
of human decency?
Surely, we must renounce nationalism
and all its symbols: its flags, its pledges of allegiance,
its anthems, its insistence in song that God must single
out America to be blessed.
We need to assert our allegiance to the human race,
and not to any one nation. We need to refute the idea
that our nation is different from, morally superior
to, the other imperial powers of world history.
The poets and artists among us seem to have a clearer
understanding of the limits of nationalism.
Langston Hughes (no wonder he was called before the
Committee on Un-American Activities) addressed his country
as follows:
You really haven't been a virgin for so long
It's ludicrous to keep up the pretext . . .
You've slept with all the big powers
In military uniforms
And you've taken the sweet life
Of all the little brown fellows . . .
Being one of the world's big vampires
Why don't you come out and say so
Like Japan, and England, and France
And all the other nymphomaniacs of power.
Henry David Thoreau, provoked by the war in Mexico
and the nationalist fervor it produced, wrote: "Nations!
What are nations? . . . Like insects, they swarm. The
historian strives in vain to make them memorable."
In our time, Kurt Vonnegut (Cat's Cradle) places nations
among those unnatural abstractions he calls granfalloons,
which he defines as "a proud and meaningless association
of human beings."
There have always been men and women in this country
who have insisted that universal standards of decent
human conduct apply to our nation as to others. That
insistence continues today and reaches out to people
all over the world. It lets them know, like the balloons
sent over the countryside by the Paris Commune in 1871,
that "our interests are the same." |
WASHINGTON -- The International
Committee of the Red Cross documented what it called
credible information about U.S.
personnel disrespecting or mishandling Korans at the
Guantanamo Bay detention facility and pointed it out
to the Pentagon in confidential reports during 2002
and early 2003, an ICRC spokesman said Wednesday.
Representatives of the ICRC, who have played a key
role in investigating abuse allegations at the facility
in Cuba and other U.S. military prisons, never witnessed
such incidents firsthand during on-site visits, said
Simon Schorno, an ICRC spokesman in Washington.
But ICRC delegates, who have
been granted access to the secretive camp since January
2002, gathered and corroborated enough similar, independent
reports from detainees to raise the issue multiple times
with Guantanamo commanders and with Pentagon officials,
Schorno said in an interview Wednesday.
Following the ICRC's reports, the Defense Department
command in Guantanamo issued almost three pages of detailed,
written guidelines for treatment of Korans. Schorno
said ICRC representatives did not receive any other
complaints or document similar incidents following the
issuance of the guidelines on Jan. 19, 2003.
The issue of how Korans are handled by American personnel
guarding Muslim detainees moved into the spotlight after
protests in Muslim nations, including deadly riots in
Afghanistan, that followed a now-retracted report in
Newsweek magazine. That story said U.S. investigators
had confirmed that interrogators had flushed a Koran
down a toilet.
The Koran is Islam's holiest book,
and mistreating it is seen as an offense against God.
Following the firestorm over the report and the riots,
the ICRC declined Wednesday to discuss what kind of
alleged incidents were involved, how many there were
or how often it reported them to American officials
prior to the release of the 2003 Koran guidelines.
"We don't want to comment
specifically on specific instances of desecration, only
on the general level of how the Koran was disrespected,"
Schorno said.
Schorno did say, however, that
there were "multiple" instances involved and
that the ICRC made confidential reports about such incidents
"multiple" times to Guantanamo and Pentagon
officials.
In addition to the retracted Newsweek story, senior
Bush administration officials have repeatedly downplayed
other reports regarding alleged abuses of the Koran
at Guantanamo, largely dismissing them because they
came from current or former detainees.
Pentagon confirms reports
Asked about the ICRC's confidential reports Wednesday
night, Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, confirmed
their existence but sought to downplay the seriousness
of their content. He said they were forwarded "on
rare occasions" and called them "detainee
allegations which they [the ICRC] could not corroborate."
But that is not how Schorno, the ICRC spokesman, portrayed
the reports.
"All information we received
were corroborated allegations," he said, adding,
"We certainly corroborated mentions of the events
by detainees themselves."
`Not just one person'
Schorno also said: "Obviously, it is not just
one person telling us something happened and we just
fire up. We take it very seriously, and very carefully,
and document everything in our confidential reports."
It was not clear whether the ICRC's corroboration
went beyond statements made independently by detainees.
[...] |
The row over a retracted Newsweek
story that US interrogators at Guantanamo Bay desecrated
the Quran is overshadowing genuine incidents of religious
humiliation, according to Human Rights Watch. "Around
the world, the United States has been humiliating Muslim
detainees by offending their religious beliefs,"
said Reed Brody, special counsel for the New
York-based watchdog on Wednesday.
Newsweek on Monday retracted an article quoting an
unidentified US official as saying that a probe into
allegations of prisoner abuse at Guantanamo found that
interrogators had thrown a Quran into a toilet to rattle
Muslim prisoners.
The weekly magazine said the sole anonymous source had
"backed away" from the account.
Brody said condemnation of the Newsweek article, which
sparked anti-US protests in Afghanistan and other countries
that left at least 14 dead, had been so vocal as to
drown out documented complaints of similar mistreatment.
Wrong investigation?
He said Human Rights Watch (HRW)
had heard allegations that US interrogators disrespected
the Quran from several former detainees, including three
Briton and a Russian.
And Erik Saar, a former Army translator at Guantanamo,
has said that guards routinely
tossed the Quran on the ground, Brody said. Saar
also described a female interrogator wiping a detainee
with what the prisoner was made to believe was menstrual
blood.
HRW argued that the Newsweek story would not have resonated
had it not been for "extensive" US abuse of
Muslim detainees and the government's failure to fully
investigate all of those implicated.
"If the United States is to repair the public relations
damage caused by its mistreatment of detainees, it needs
to investigate those who ordered or condoned this abuse,
not attack those who have tried to report on it,"
said Brody. |
LOS ANGELES -- A
Muslim woman who said she ordered a Quran through Amazon.com
only to find profanity and religious slurs written inside
asked Wednesday for an apology and a full investigation
by the online retailer.
Azza Basarudin, 30, said she received the Quran by
mail on May 5 after ordering it through a used books
division of Amazon.com that allows customers to order
directly from third-party sellers approved by the company.
When she opened the Quaran, Basarudin
said she found profanity and the phrase "Death
to all Muslims" written in thick black marker on
the otherwise-blank first page.
"I dropped the book because I didn't know what
to do," she said at a news conference at the Islamic
Center of Southern California.
Salam Al-Marayati, executive director of the Muslim
Public Affairs Council, said his organization wants
a public apology and investigation from Amazon.com,
as well as the firing of those responsible for mailing
the desecrated book.
Patty Smith, a spokeswoman for the Seattle-based book
retailer, said the Quran was purchased directly from
Bellwether Books, a small book resale company in McKeesport,
Pa., through the "Marketplace" section of
Amazon's Web site.
"This was not our inventory, it was nowhere in
our order or fulfillment process," she said. "It
was a used book purchased through a third party."
Richard Roberts, owner of Bellwether, said he doubts
the book was defaced by his employees. The company buys
used books at bargain prices from individuals, other
book stores and libraries and then resells them through
Amazon.com and other outlets.
He said before this incident, his six employees gave
each book a cursory check before shipping and didn't
look inside the pages.
Roberts said Bellwether has since instituted a more
stringent quality control check. Bellwether is also
suspended indefinitely from selling Qurans through Amazon.com,
Smith said.
Bellwether apologized to Basarudin by e-mail and offered
to replace the book. Amazon.com also apologized, reimbursed
her for the Quran's cost and mailed Basarudin a gift
certificate, Smith said. |
WASHINGTON (AP) - Environmental
and animal-protection activists who have turned to arson
and explosives are the top U.S. domestic terrorism threat,
an FBI official told a Senate committee.
Some of the activists also target companies abroad
with whose policies they disagree. Groups such as the
Animal Liberation Front, the Earth Liberation Front
and the Britain-based SHAC, or Stop Huntingdon Animal
Cruelty, are "way out in front" in terms of
damage and number of crimes, said John Lewis, the FBI's
deputy assistant director for counter-terrorism.
"There is nothing else going on in this country
over the last several years that is racking up the high
number of violent crimes and terrorist actions,"
Lewis said.
Animal Liberation Front said on its website its small,
autonomous groups of people take "direct action"
against animal abuse by rescuing animals and causing
financial loss to animal exploiters, usually through
damage and destruction of property. Earth Liberation
Front is an underground movement with no public leadership,
membership or spokesperson.
SHAC describes itself as a worldwide campaign that
began in 1999 to rescue animals from research labs and
shut down the businesses that rely on their use. It
said it "does not encourage or incite illegal activity."
Lewis said the FBI made its conclusions after analyzing
all types of cases and comparing the groups with "right-wing
extremists, KKK, anti-abortion groups and the like."
He said most animal-Protection and eco-extremists
so far have refrained from violence targeting human
life.
"The FBI has observed troubling signs that this
is changing. We have seen an escalation in violent rhetoric
and tactics," he told the Senate environment and
public works committee.
"Attacks are also growing in frequency and size."
Republican Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma, the panel's
chairman, said he hoped to examine more closely how
the groups raise money and communications support from
"mainstream activists," not directly blamed
for the violence, who are affiliated with tax-exempt
organizations.
"Just like al-Qaida or any other terrorist organization,
ELF and ALF cannot accomplish their goals without money,
membership and the media," Inhofe said.
The FBI said 35 of its offices have 150 open investigations
and activists are claiming responsibility for 1,200
crimes between 1990 and mid-2004.
Investigators cite examples of people using arson,
bombings, theft, release of animals, vandalism, telephone
harassment, letters rigged with razor blades and office
takeovers.
Such tactics have been used in what officials call
"direct action" campaigns to disrupt university
research labs, restaurants, fur farms and logging operations.
Newer targets include SUV dealerships and new home developments
as signs of urban sprawl.
Officials said the incidents have caused more than
$110 million in damage. The biggest so far was an arson
fire at a five-storey condominium under construction
in San Diego, Calif., in August 2003 that caused $50
million in damage. |
There's only one way
to make sure that the machinery of state-terror is operating
at maximum efficiency; flip on the switch and let er rip.
That was thinking behind last month's massive roundup
of 10,000 American citizens in what was aptly-christened
Operation Falcon.
Operation Falcon was a massive clandestine dragnet that
involved hundreds of state, federal and local law-enforcement
agencies during the week of April 4 to April 10, 2005.
It was the largest criminal-sweep in the nation's history
and was brainchild of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
and his counterpart in the US Marshal's office, (Director)
Ben Reyna.
The secret-raids "produced the largest number of
arrests ever recorded during a single initiative,"
Reyna boasted.
The details are mind-boggling. Over 960 agencies (state,
local and federal) were directly involved acting on 13,800
felony warrants and spending nearly $900,000 on the operation.
As the conservative Washington Times noted, "The
sweep was a virtual clearinghouse for warrants on drug,
gang, gun and sex-offender suspects nationwide."
It's clear that the Marshal's office knew where the vast
majority of the suspects were or they never would have
had such stunning success rounding them up; which, of
course, begs the question, "Why did they wait to
apprehend alleged' murderers, when they already knew where
they were hiding?"
According to the press releases, which celebrated the
dazzling display of law enforcement, the raids netted
"162 accused or convicted of murder, 638 wanted for
armed robbery, 553 wanted for rape or sexual assault,
154 gang members and 106 unregistered sex offenders."
(CNN)
Okay, that's roughly 1,000 criminals; what about the
other 9,000? Traffic tickets, late child-support payments,
jay-walking???
"We're really amazed. We had no idea we'd apprehend
more than 10,000 bad guys," said one federal law
enforcement official who asked not to be identified. "We
didn't know what to expect, but the response from law
enforcement personnel everywhere was truly amazing."
(CNN)
The media's approbation does little to disguise the real
purpose of Operation Falcon. (which is an acronym for
"Federal and Local Cops Organized Nationally.")
The Bush administration is sharpening
its talons for the inevitable difficulties it expects
to face as a result of its disastrous policies. With each
regressive initiative, the governing cabal seems to get
increasingly paranoid, anticipating an outburst of public
rage. Now, they're orchestrating massive round-ups of
minor crooks to make sure that every cog and gear in the
apparatus of state repression is lubricated and ready
to go.
Rest assured that Attorney General Gonzales has absolutely
no interest in the petty offenders that were netted in
this extraordinary crackdown. His action is just another
indication that the noose is tightening around the neck
of the American public and that the Bush team is fully
prepared for any unpleasant eventualities. They want to
make sure that everyone knows that they're ready when
its time to thin out the ranks of mutinous citizens.
(Note: to date, the US Marshall's office
has issued no public statement to the press as to whether
the 10,000 people arrested in operation Falcon have been
processed or released.) |
WASHINGTON, May 18 - The
Bush administration and Senate Republican leaders are
pushing a plan that would significantly expand the F.B.I.'s
power to demand business records in terror investigations
without obtaining approval from
a judge, officials said on Wednesday.
The proposal, which is likely to be considered next
week in a closed session of the Senate intelligence
committee, would allow federal
investigators to subpoena records from businesses and
other institutions without a judge's sign-off if they
declared that the material was needed as part of a foreign
intelligence investigation.
The proposal, part of a broader plan to extend antiterrorism
powers under the law known as the USA Patriot Act, was
concluded in recent days by Republican leaders on the
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in consultation
with the Bush administration, Congressional officials
said.
Administration and Congressional officials who support
the idea said the proposal would give the F.B.I. a much-needed
tool to track leads in terrorism and espionage investigations
that would be quicker and less cumbersome than existing
methods. They pointed out that the administrative subpoena
power being sought for the F.B.I. in terror cases was
already in use in more than 300 other types of crimes,
including health care fraud, child exploitation, racketeering
and drug trafficking.
"Why not provide that same tool to national security
investigators as well?" asked an aide to the intelligence
committee who was involved in the proposal, speaking
on condition of anonymity because the issue will be
discussed at a closed meeting scheduled for May 26.
"There wasn't really a whole lot of cogent argument
against it."
But word of the proposal on
Wednesday generated immediate protests from civil rights
advocates, who said that it would give the F.B.I. virtually
unchecked authority in terror investigations, and
the plan is likely to intensify the growing debate in
Congress over the balance between fighting terrorism
and protecting privacy rights.
"This is a dramatic expansion of the federal
government's power," said Lisa Graves, senior counsel
for the American Civil Liberties Union in Washington.
"It's really a power grab by the administration
for the F.B.I. to secretly demand medical records, tax
records, gun purchase records and all sorts of other
material if they deem it relevant to an intelligence
investigation."
Kevin Madden, a spokesman for the Justice Department,
said department officials welcomed the intelligence
committee's efforts "to support provisions that
enhance law enforcement's ability to combat terrorism
effectively and are particularly heartened by their
support for the USA Patriot Act." [...]
One provision of the law that has generated perhaps
more criticism than any other is Section 215, derided
by critics as the "library records" provision.
It allows the F.B.I. to go to
a secret intelligence court to demand access to material
from businesses and other institutions as part of intelligence
investigations.
The Justice Department said in a newly declassified
report last month that it had used the power 35 times
since late 2003 to gain information on apartment leasing,
driver's licenses, financial records and other data
in intelligence investigations.
But it stressed that it had not used the authority to
date to demand records from libraries or bookstores
or to get information related to medical or gun records
- all areas of concern to critics. [...] |
WASHINGTON - The House
Resources Committee on Wednesday approved spending $38
million to restore and preserve internment camps used
to hold Japanese-Americans during World War II.
The legislation by Rep. Bill Thomas, R-Bakersfield,
was approved on a voice vote and now goes to the full
House. It faces opposition from the Bush administration,
which objects to the expenditures because the National
Park Service faces a tight budget and maintenance backlogs
at parks.
Thomas' bill would authorize spending for the 10 internment
camps that were established throughout the country,
including two in California, Tule Lake and Manzanar.
The money could also go for other sites where people
were assembled.
The internment happened after President Franklin Roosevelt
signed an executive order in 1942 authorizing removal
of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans and others of Japanese
ancestry, including many living in California, to "assembly
centers" and then to the camps.
The camps were closed in 1945 and 1946, and President
Ronald Reagan and Congress formally apologized in 1988
for the treatment of the people held there.
"The clock is ticking," Thomas said in a
statement. "As we move further in time from the
period in which over 120,000 Japanese-Americans were
forced from their homes to internment camps, we are
increasingly losing not only the infrastructure of the
camps, but more importantly, those people who were detained."
Thomas' support for the measure stems in part from
a longtime friendship with former Democratic state legislator
Fred Mori, past president of the Japanese American Citizens
League based in San Francisco.
|
And now the ''nuclear
option.'' Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist
vows to blow up the Senate by getting the Republican majority
to outlaw any filibuster against President Bush's judicial
nominees. Democrats have approved 208 of Bush's 218 nominees,
but are blocking 10 as too extreme. That is unacceptable
to Frist.
Bush might sensibly have defused the situation in the
hope of moving forward on the business of the American
people, but instead he threw gasoline on the fire. In
a direct insult to his opposition, he renominated the
same handful of extremists previously blocked. Now he
demands an up-or-down vote on them -- essentially ordering
Frist to blow up the Senate. As in the run-up to the war
in Iraq, he's intent on winning, with little sense of
the costs and consequences of what he's driving the country
into.
Outside groups on both sides are
mobilizing. The right of the Republican Party has called
blocking a handful of Bush's nominees an assault on ''people
of faith.'' (The president apparently is so infallible
that to question even 10 of more than 200 nominees is
to risk eternal damnation.) Liberals have started
touting the filibuster as the bedrock of democracy.
But this debate isn't about freedom of religion. And
it isn't about the filibuster. It's about the judges and
the direction of the country.
Bush's mantra is that he simply wants judges who will
follow the law, not legislate their own will from the
bench. He wants judicial restraint, not judicial activism.
But that is simply nonsense, and the president knows it.
Bush isn't nominating conservative judges as his father
did; he's nominating radicals, vetted by the right-wing
Federalist Society, and dedicated to advancing the movement's
agenda through the courts. He's naming judges who will
overturn precedents that the conservative movement doesn't
like -- from Roe vs. Wade that gave women the right of
choice, to Brown vs. Board of Education that outlawed
segregation, to the core jurisprudence of the New Deal.
This is central to the right's battle to remake America
in its image. Whenever a movement pushes for dramatic
social change, it naturally runs up against the status
quo bias of the courts. The New Deal movement ran headlong
into the free market doctrines that conservative judges
had implanted into the Constitution. Those doctrines made
labor unions an illegal restraint of trade. They deemed
the 40-hour workweek, or health-and-safety regulations,
to be unconstitutional infringements on the market. For
Roosevelt and the New Deal to wrench America into the
modern age, new doctrine was needed. The result: a brutal
struggle over the courts.
When the civil rights movement challenged apartheid in
America, it ran into the racist doctrines that segregationist
judges had implanted into the Constitution. Once more,
those doctrines -- separate but equal -- had to be overturned.
And a Republican chief justice of the Supreme Court, Earl
Warren, led the court in doing so -- and the courts came
under vicious attack. ''Impeach Earl Warren'' signs went
up across the South. And a right-wing backlash against
the courts began.
What does the right-wing movement want
from judges? It wants judges who will overturn the precedent
set by Roe and outlaw abortion. It wants an end to affirmative
action, with many saying the Brown ruling that outlawed
segregation was wrongly decided.
But it wants much more than this. The
Federalist Society is dominated by an obscure sect that
believes in the ''Constitution in exile.'' Essentially,
adherents argue for a return to the 19th century jurisprudence
of the Gilded Age -- calling on judges to overturn the
New Deal jurisprudence that empowered Congress to regulate
the economy, defend workers, protect the environment and
consumers, and hold corporations accountable. No, I'm
not kidding, and neither are they.
Will the right be able to use a current Republican majority
in the Senate to ensconce zealots on the bench to enforce
their agenda over the next decades? This answer will say
much about what kind of country we will become. No one
should be on the sidelines in this one. |
When I went off to
work as a teacher-researcher in the United States in 1978,
the contrast with Europe was striking. An educational
system generally of very poor quality and glaring inequality,
a constant invasion of daily life by advertising and commercialisation,
a strongly anti-intellectual culture, a population profoundly
alienated politically (two parties monopolizing public
life, pursuing the same policies and with limited ability
to mobilize the electorate), an omnipresent militarism
and scandalous social disparities (notably in terms of
security, housing and access to health care). And all
that was upheld ideologically by a perfect self-satisfaction
and by the idea that the American model should be imposed,
like it or not, on the rest of the world.
In those days, Europe was largely social democratic and
peaceful; there was a strong system of social protection,
unemployment existed but was not structural, education
was being democratized and modernized but continued to
transmit knowledge, television was free of advertising,
it was possible to walk safely in the streets, there was
no far right to be seen, there was no talk of fundamentalism
or separate ethnic communities, and the idea of taxing
the rich was not shocking to anyone (except to the rich
themselves, of course). Having been defeated in its colonial
conflicts, Europe had abandoned its imperial ambitions
and its citizens were tired of war. All was far from perfect,
but, compared to the present-day outlook, it was a "socialist
paradise" that managed to be both democratic and
real. On the other hand, from the viewpoint of the European
privileged classes, it was, if not hell (their privileges
being far from abolished), at least purgatory.
Fortunately for them, the eighties and nineties were
the time of neo-liberal and neo-militarist follies. Europe
came around to imitating the United States, even if, at
the same time, the United States was getting worse. This
at least maintained the gap between the two, obscured
the extent of the upheavals underway, and allowed the
European elites to complain ceaselessly that "Europe
was falling behind". One of the preferred methods
of catching up is called "European construction",
whose latest manifestation is the treaty for establishing
a European Constitution.
The method is simplicity itself. It consists in isolating
political processes from the influence of the citizenry,
by entrusting a maximum of decisions to a non-elected
bureaucracy which is not answerable to any parliament,
but which is open to the influence of every possible private
pressure group (including certain NGOs). European construction
boils down to transferring State power to a super-privileged
bureaucracy which preaches to others the purest economic
liberalism. Elections can go on being held, but they are
of no importance, because no serious political alternative
can be proposed, no "New Deal", no "structural
reform", no "common programme of the left",
no "Italian way to socialism". Competition and
the free market are the only prospects on the horizon
now and forever. And, as in the United States, people
vote more and more with their feet by avoiding the ballot
box, or else vote for whoever seems to be most hated by
those in power (Le Pen for instance).
The results of the policies accompanying this "European
construction" are catastrophic: whereas the urgent
need, after the rapid growth of the fifties and sixties,
was for disarmament, cooperation with the third world
and ecological development, on the contrary everything
was done to encourage waste, endanger people's very existence,
exacerbate antagonisms between North and South and give
free rein to every possible particularism and fundamentalism.
Jeremy Rifkin's recent book speaks of the "European
dream" and provides a long list of Europe's advantages
in the fields of security, health, education and even
scientific research. But all that is precisely the effect
of our "falling behind" the model our "advanced
Europeans" are desperately trying to catch up with.
Of course, there has been economic progress. But there
was also economic progress -- more of it, in fact -- during
the preceding period of social democracy and sovereign
States. But for the past twenty years, how many social
advances have there been? What progress has been made
in workers' control over their work? How many major collective
decisions have been taken to improve living conditions?
It is no doubt better not to ask such questions.
In the discussions on the constitution, at least on the
left, there are in general two types of argument: those
who refer to the texts, who are for voting "no",
and those who refer to Auschwitz and Le Pen, who are for
voting "yes". To hear the latter, one would
think that rejection of the constitution would lead us
into war, if not genocide. This argument, which considers
that peace depends on eliminating sovereignty, fails to
note that there is more than one kind of sovereignty.
Europe is seeking to create its own sovereignty, imitating
that of the United States which has strong borders and
troops deployed to the four corners of the earth. This
creates the danger of endless war, as sooner or later
people do not welcome armed missionaries. On the other
hand, Switzerland is without doubt the most sovereign
country in Europe, but it has never sent its troops abroad,
never committed genocide nor started a war.
A referendum has its disadvantages in comparison to an
election: those who win an election can always end up
doing the opposite of what they promised. The clarity
of a referendum prevents such manipulations, and that
may be why the procedure is often denounced as dangerous
and "populist". On the other hand, there is
no way to prevent people giving the same answer to a question
for different reasons, which means that there is sure
to be left-wing "no", a right-wing "no"
and a far right "no". But so what? It is rather
odd that those who have supported the policies creating
the social conditions that giver rise to the far right
now turn around and try to use its existence against those
who are precisely seeking to break with those policies.
European construction also enables ecological and socialist
leaders to protect themselves from their own principles,
or rather from those of their supporters. Every capitulation
to the right can always be justified by "Europe".
Indeed -- but who wants and who has constructed that Europe?
It is easier to evoke Auschwitz than to explain how a
social, democratic and ecological Europe can be based
on a "highly competitive" deregulated economy.
To cite only one simple example, how is it possible to
pursue an ecological policy if public transport has to
be profitable?
The most dishonest argument of the "yes" camp
is without doubt the one about a strong Europe standing
up to the United States. For one thing, it is enough to
read the American press or to listen to U.S. leaders,
who wholeheartedly support the "yes" (while
complaining that the most popular argument is precisely
the one about standing up to the United States), to realize
how shaky that argument is. For another, a Europe whose
educational system is sacrified on the altar of short-term
profit will be simply a second USA, not an alternative
to it. The rest of the world already has enough problems
with a single ignorant, aggressive and arrogant superpower.
Preferring peace to war and security to competition means
opposing the United States, or at least what it represents,
but also opposing "European construction".
There is at least one argument used by the "yes'
camp that is partly correct: the debate goes beyond the
narrow bounds of the treaty's text to become largely symbolic.
It fundamentally pits against each other partisans and
adversaries of the neo-liberal order, those who want to
pursue the policy begun in the 1980s and those who want
to change it. A victory of the "no" would provoke
a political shock wave, principally by awakening, throughout
Europe, the social and popular aspirations which have
for so long been repressed and defeated. With Bush in
Washington, Sharon in Tel Aviv, Wolfowitz at the World
Bank and Ratzinger in the Vatican, one might conclude
that reactionary forces have got their way worldwide.
But with Chavez in Caracas, the "no" which is
growing in Paris and the U.S. army bogged down in Iraq,
hope may be changing sides and this is what gives a profound
meaning to this campaign. Even if the "yes"
wins (and in light of the disproportion of the means at
the disposal of the two sides, it would be a miracle if
if didn't), the mobilization for the "no" shows
that the times are changing and that the days of TINA
(There Is No Alternative to unbridled capitalism) are
no doubt counted. After all, the grassroots movement for
"no" was launched primarily (on the left) by
ATTAC and by the CGT base, which in themselves are far
from representing a majority of French people. The echo
of that movement throughout French society is an immense
sign of encouragement and shows that if the genuine left
is at once bold and intelligent, it can rally practically
a majority of French people around specific objectives.
Moreover, as in the case of Venezuela's referendum, or
the anti-war mobilization in 2003, a victory of the "no"
would show that the media are not invincible, that they
don't yet exercise total brain control and that Internet
is a formidable weapon against their propaganda.
In 2003, the former leader of the Algerian FLN, Ahmed
Ben Bella, so many of whose companions were killed and
tortured by the French army, went so far as to exclaim,
"Vive la France!" He would not have been able
to exclaim "vive l'Europe", given how subservient
its bureaucracy is to the United States. But France, far
from being a "black sheep", at that moment of
its history was a sign of hope and rallying for the whole
of the Arab world about to be plunged once more into the
horror of colonialism and, as a result, of a war of national
liberation (which is far from being over in Iraq, or for
that matter in Palestine). By the same token, the Venezuela
of Chavez and Cuba are not "isolated" in Latin
America -- they embody the ideals and hopes of the masses
of the people.
The left-wing elites have for a long time shamed France
by reducing her past to Vichy and (for the far left) to
the Algerian war. But France is also the first democratic
revolution on the European continent (and the most radical
of all), the Paris Commune, the denunciation of anti-semitism
at the time of the Dreyfus case, the Popular Front, the
biggest of all general strikes (in May-June 1968) and
the model for secularism throughout the world. With the
campaign for "no" to the European constitution,
after the official "no" in 2003 to American
imperial policy, France once again arouses surprise and
admiration in much of the world and gives a fresh impetus
to a movement, stalled for decades but more necessary
than ever, in favor of peace and social progress.
Jean Bricmont lives in Brussels. |
POLICE
dealing with civil unrest during the G8 summit in Scotland
will have in their armoury controversial weapons that
have been blamed for the deaths of 104 civilians in
the United States and Canada.
Powerful Taser stun-guns will be available to specially
trained armed response officers for the first time in
Scotland from late next month, The Scotsman has learned.
The weapons, which fire electric wires from compressed
nitrogen cartridges and deliver 50,000-volt shocks to
their targets, could be used in the event of serious
disorder during the conference at Gleneagles Hotel or
if street protests in the likes of Edinburgh turn violent,
as they have at past G8 events.
But while Taser training programmes continue in police
forces throughout Scotland, some US states are reviewing
their use after a series of deaths during the pursuit
of suspects.
Members of the Police Federation of England and Wales
this week joined forces with their colleagues north
of the Border by giving unanimous backing to calls for
Tasers to be supplied to all officers, not only armed
response units, called on to deal with serious incidents.
An overwhelming 95 per cent of delegates at their annual
conference approved the motion.
Yesterday, the Association of Chief Police Officers
said it had put the Home Office "on notice"
that it wants more officers to be trained to use the
weapon. Mike Tonge, the chief constable of Gwent, said:
"We want to make it more available and possibly
extend it to more officers, beyond firearms officers."
Last week, a survey revealed that eight out of ten
officers in Scotland were in favour of frontline police
carrying the stun-guns. The Association of Chief Police
Officers in Scotland (ACPOS) said every Scots force
now had, or was in the process of procuring, Tasers
for armed response units, and firearms police officers
were being trained to use them.
A spokeswoman said: "Scotland's major constabularies
are all in the process of procuring the weapons after
both ACPOS and the former home secretary, David Blunkett,
gave their full backing to the introduction of the weapons
last year.
|
PARIS - Iraq tried
to compensate former French interior minister Charles
Pasqua in the late 1990s with millions of barrels of oil
for his helpful attitude toward Baghdad, Le Monde newspaper
reported Wednesday.
The French daily said a former aide to Pasqua who is
under investigation in France in connection with the UN
oil-for-food programme in Iraq, Bernard Guillet, told
an examining magistrate that Pasqua had been offered oil
allocations.
Guillet reportedly said former Iraqi deputy prime minister
Tareq Aziz had told him "that Iraq wanted to thank
Pasqua for the role he played in 1993 when he organized
the first visit for a high-level official in
France".
Aziz then allegedly told Guillet that Saddam Hussein
wanted to thank Pasqua with oil allocations, Le Monde
reported.
But a source close to the investigation said it was still
unclear whether the 78-year-old Pasqua - now a French
senator - had actually received the oil, as alleged by
a US Senate probe.
Last week, a US Senate panel accused Pasqua, along with
the controversial British lawmaker George Galloway, of
taking massive oil allocations as kickbacks in the 1990s
from Saddam's regime under the UN oil-for-food programme.
The USD 64 billion UN scheme, which ran from 1996 to
2003, allowed Baghdad, which was under international sanctions,
to sell limited quantities of oil so it could buy food
and medicines for the Iraqi people.
The US Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations
based its report on what it said were Iraqi oil ministry
documents and the testimony of senior officials in Saddam's
regime, ousted in the US-led invasion in March 2003.
Both Pasqua and Galloway have vehemently denied the allegations.
Guillet denied ever receiving any oil allocations himself,
and contested charges that he had "served as an intermediary
so that Charles Pasqua could receive such allocations".
But he did admit to French magistrate Philippe Courroye
that he had met with Iraqi officials tasked with the commercialization
of Iraqi oil.
Last month, Guillet, 59, was placed under judicial investigation
in France - one step shy of formal charges - as part of
a corruption probe connected with the UN oil-for-food
programme.
French investigators believe Guillet received commissions
from a middleman who brokered the resale of Iraqi oil.
But when questioned on April 28 by Courroye, Guillet
said the documents the French judge was using for his
probe were suspect, adding: "I think the Americans
created false documents."
The French probe is largely based on information gathered
by the independent commission of inquiry into the oil-for-food
programme led by former US Federal Reserve chairman Paul
Volcker.
Pasqua served twice as France's interior minister - from
1986 to 1998 and again from 1993 to 1995. He is best known
for pushing through a series of anti-immigration laws.
The US panel said in its report that Pasqua sought to
conceal his involvement because he "feared political
scandals".
Pasqua said Monday he had been targeted by the US Senate
as a way to discredit French President Jacques Chirac,
with whom the former minister was once close. |
HONG KONG (Reuters)
- The spate of human bird flu
cases in Vietnam this year suggests the deadly virus
may be mutating in ways that are making it more capable
of being passed between humans, according to a World
Health Organization report.
The finding points to the greatest fear of health experts
that the H5N1 virus could unleash a pandemic and kill
millions around the globe if ever it gained the ability
to be transmitted among humans efficiently.
While investigators could not prove
human-to-human transmission had occurred, the report
said that "the pattern of disease appeared to have
changed in a manner consistent with this possibility."
"They (findings) demonstrate that the viruses
are continuing to evolve and pose a continuing and potentially
growing pandemic threat," the report said.
Klaus Stohr, WHO's global influenza program coordinator,
told a news briefing in Geneva: "We don't know
whether the pandemic will occur next week or next year...We
should continue very intensively with pandemic preparations."
H5N1 made its first known jump to humans in Hong Kong
in 1997 and experts have always established that the
mode of transmission was through direct contact with
birds.
But the virus has mutated since, raising fears among
experts that it may one day adapt in humans and become
easily passed between them, setting off a pandemic.
In the six-page report, produced after an expert meeting
in Manila from May 6-7, the WHO said at least 92 adults
and children in Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia had become
ill after being infected with H5N1 since late 2003,
and 52 of them had died. Stohr said the toll had risen
to 97 cases with 53 deaths.
More clusters of infections involving
household members have occurred, opening the possibility
that "person-to-person transmission" may have
taken place, the WHO said.
Eight such clusters were observed in north Vietnam
this year alone, with recent cases spanning over a longer
period.
"What we are seeing so far is a slight increase
in clusters which could indicate more transmission...,"
Stohr said.
There was "circumstantial evidence" for such
transmission -- which could not be proved -- but based
on belief that a person became sick after being exposed
only to an infected person and not to a sick chicken
or duck, according to the expert.
"Then you can talk about very strong evidence
for human to human transmission. That has happened in
three clusters, two in Vietnam and one in Thailand...,"
Stohr added.
|
Dozens of biodefence
laboratories in North America, Britain, France, Germany
and Israel were - and may still be - prime
targets for Russian spies out to win the global war
for deadly germs and viruses, a newly published book
by former KGB operative, Alexander Kouzminov, reveals.
Kouzminov, who now lives with his wife in New Zealand,
worked at the highly secretive Department 12 of Directorate
S - the special operations branch of Russia’s
Foreign Intelligence Service and its forerunner, the
Soviet KGB - for about 10 years.
He says its primary tasks were biological espionage,
planning acts of terrorism and sabotage, preparing for
biological warfare with the West, and supporting the
Soviet, and later the Russian, biological weapons program.
He estimates that about 60 people, including the so-called
’illegals’ (spies who worked secretly under
assumed names and “well-documented cover stories”),
special agents and friendly sources, carried out Department
12’s tasks overseas in the 1990s, “and possibly
as many still do today.”
Department 12 was interested in many types of facilities
in all NATO countries, including high-level containment
labs dealing with dangerous pathogens, infectious diseases
and means to combat biological and toxin warfare, the
former spy claims.
His book says that by the end of the 1980s it became
apparent the West did not have a genuine offensive biological
warfare program, unlike the Soviet Union, which had
begun the mass production and storage of “highly
effective” weapons.
“We discovered that, at the time, western countries
were absolutely unprepared to face our weapons if the
Soviet Union (or, later, Russia) had started a biological
war against the main enemy, the U.S.A. and the NATO
countries.”
Meanwhile, Department 12 was still collecting samples
of biological materials and secret documents obtained
by illegals and special agents.
Sometimes these were delivered to Moscow by means of
an urgent channel codenamed VOLNA, or wave, via an international
flight of the Soviet Aeroflot airline. Active and often
deadly biological materials, including micro-organisms,
pathogens and biotoxins, were stashed in the pilots’
cabin.
Even at the beginning of the 1990s, when Russia’s
relationship with the West changed for the better, Directorate
S carried on its work. “For us that meant: while
favorable circumstances exist it is essential to utilize
the respite to deploy to the West as many illegals as
possible and to cultivate and recruit more special agents,”
Kouzminov writes.
The former spy left Russia in late 1994, and now works
as an adviser to New Zealand’s Health Ministry.
He says he decided to reveal the details of his work
following the 9/11 terrorist attacks “and the
subsequent potential and quite serious threat of biological
terrorism and sabotage around the world.”
|
Forty-four per cent
of deaths in South Africa last year were caused by HIV/AIDS,
according to projections from the country's Medical Research
Council.
"South Africa is in the grip of an HIV/AIDS epidemic
of shattering proportions," the council says in introducing
recent research on causes of death in the country.
Estimates of death from AIDS-related diseases have risen
catastrophically in recent years.
In a 2001 report, the council put the rate in the late
1990s at 25 per cent of all deaths, countrywide.
More recent estimates put the rate at 30 per cent -
nearly one in three people who died in South Africa in
2000 died of HIV/AIDS, the council says. It was the top
killer in all provinces save Western Cape, it adds.
And the situation is worsening dramatically, according
to the researchers' projections.
In the conclusion to its National Burden of Disease Study
2000, the council warns ominously: "The ... model
projects that in 2004, the total number of deaths from
all causes will be over 700,000 and that 44 per cent of
them will be due to HIV/AIDS."
That's nearly 310,000 deaths.
It goes on to recommend urgent adoption of recent government
initiatives in treatment, blocking the spread of the disease
and support for infected persons.
The South African government refused to comment yesterday.
"The report has not been released officially, which
means the minister and the director-general haven't seen
it yet," health department spokesperson Solly Mabotha
told the South African Press Association. "We therefore
cannot comment."
Mark Heywood, spokesperson for the Treatment Action Campaign,
told Johannesburg newspaper The Star: "These figures
are just going to get worse and worse."
And the National Association of People Living with HIV
and AIDS said the appalling death rates come as no surprise.
"For a long time we have been seeing parents burying
their children, not the other way around - even
as people were not saying that it was AIDS their children
were dying from," spokesperson Thanduxolo Doro told
The Star.
The research council's analysis of deaths up to year
2000 broke causes down by province.
In KwaZulu-Natal province, 41.5 per cent of deaths are
attributable to AIDS, followed by Mpumalanga with 40.7
per cent, the report says.
In Gauteng, South Africa's economic heartland, AIDS accounts
for 32.5 per cent of deaths, it says.
The national average was 30 per cent and only in Western
Cape was the proportion of AIDS deaths less than 10 per
cent of the total.
Because South Africa is still updating cause-of-death
reporting standards, the researchers admit some gaps in
data had to be filled in with estimates, but said they
stand by the results because they used a series of criteria
to ensure accuracy.
"There is some uncertainty, because we don't have
the truth at hand to compare it against," lead researcher
Dr. Debbie Bradshaw told the South African Press Association.
"But we don't think we are over- or understating
the picture. These are the best estimates we can come
up with," Bradshaw said. |
OTTAWA (CP) - An Alberta biodefence
laboratory was - and may still be - a prime target of
Russian spies out to win the global war for deadly germs
and viruses, a newly published book reveals.
In his memoir Biological Espionage, former operative
Alexander Kouzminov singles out the Defence Department's
Suffield research facility in Ralston, Alta., as one
of the "main targets" of Russian intelligence.
Kouzminov, who now lives with his wife in New Zealand,
toiled for almost 10 years in the highly secretive Department
12 of Directorate S - the special operations branch
of Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service and its forerunner,
the Soviet KGB.
Kouzminov says the primary
tasks of Department 12 were biological espionage, planning
acts of terrorism and sabotage, preparing for biological
warfare with the West, and supporting the Soviet, later
the Russian, biological weapons program.
The goals were pursued with the help of "Illegals"
- Russian spies sent to the West who worked secretly
under assumed names and "well-documented cover
stories."
Kouzminov warns that during the early 1990s, when
Russia's relationship with the West became less frosty,
Directorate S never took the thaw to heart.
"For us that meant: while favourable
circumstances exist it is essential to utilize the respite
to deploy to the West as many Illegals as possible and
to cultivate and recruit more special agents."
He estimates that about 60 people, including Illegals,
special agents and friendly sources, carried out Department
12's tasks overseas in the 1990s, "and possibly
as many still do today."
Defence Research and Development Canada's facility
at Suffield, Alta., which dates from the Second World
War era, is a leader in exploring means of defending
against chemical and biological warfare agents.
It is listed by Kouzminov among dozens of "main
targets" in North America, Britain, France, Germany
and Israel.
Though the Suffield centre is the only Canadian organization
mentioned by name, the former
spy notes Department 12 was interested in other types
of facilities in all NATO countries, including high-level
containment labs dealing with dangerous pathogens, infectious
diseases and means to combat biological and toxin warfare.
A spokesman for the Suffield facility did not return
a phone call Wednesday.
The book says by the end of the 1980s it became apparent
the West did not have a genuine offensive biological
warfare program, unlike the Soviet Union, which had
begun the mass production and storage of "highly
effective" weapons.
"We discovered that, at the time, western countries
were absolutely unprepared to face our weapons if the
Soviet Union (or, later, Russia) had started a biological
war against the main enemy, the U.S.A. and the NATO
countries."
Meanwhile, Department 12 was
busy collecting samples of biological materials and
secret documents obtained by Illegals and special agents.
Sometimes these were delivered to Moscow by means
of a urgent channel codenamed VOLNA, or wave, via an
international flight of the Soviet Aeroflot airline.
Active and often deadly biological
materials, including micro-organisms, pathogens and
biotoxins, were stashed in the the pilots' cabin.
Kouzminov, who left Russia in late 1994, says he decided
to break his silence about the clandestine work following
the 9/11 terrorist attacks "and the subsequent
potential and quite serious threat of biological terrorism
and sabotage around the world."
A new International Biological Security Agency, under
the auspices of the United Nations, is needed to control
the problem, argues Kouzminov, who works as an adviser
to New Zealand's health ministry.
"Having been, so to speak, a poacher, I am now
a gamekeeper," he writes.
"It seems unbelievable to me that I am working
in an organization in a western country that my former
Department 12 colleagues would regard as a worthy espionage
target." |
EDMONTON - Health authorities
in Alberta are looking for help from Health Canada to
deal with a small outbreak of the hantavirus, a potentially
fatal disease.
Officials have confirmed a fourth case after one woman
died last week and another adult and child from the
same family in central Alberta became ill. They say
a man from Hobbema, south of Edmonton, has come down
with the infection.
Dr. Karen Grimsrud, deputy provincial health officer,
says the latest case is not related to the first, but
that makes it a bigger concern.
"I think it leaves us with a question that we
had last week and that is, there's something unusual
going on here, how can we explain this cluster?"
Hantavirus is a respiratory illness spread by infected
deer mice through their droppings, their urine or their
saliva. It's most common in the spring, when people
are outdoors or doing spring cleaning and breathing
in air-borne particles.
Grimsrud says the province has asked for Health Canada's
assistance to determine whether there is a higher percentage
of mice infected in the area.
She also noted there's a higher than usual mouse population
in Alberta this year. |
YAIPEI : A manhunt is on in Taiwan
for a suspect who added poison to bottles of a popular
energy drink, killing one person.
Three other victims are in hospital, two of them reportedly
in critical condition.
Police believe the drinks were laced with cyanide.
Bottles of the energy drink 'Bullwild' sold in Taichung
City had a small note stuck on them.
It read: "I am poisonous, don't drink me."
Unfortunately, four buyers did not notice the warning.
They purchased the popular drink at separate convenient
stores located near each other.
And one man, Chou Yee-Gui, collapsed and died after
drinking it. Two others are in critical condition. [...] |
OTTAWA - Africa's leading expert
on genetically modified foods has been refused a visa
to attend a meeting next week in Montreal at the Secretariat
for the UN Convention on Biological Diversity.
Ethiopia's chief scientist, Dr. Tewolde Berhan Gebre
Egziabher, is critical of genetically modified foods,
and his opinions often run counter to those of the Canadian
government. He has been to Canada many times to attend
meetings on biodiversity.
He is Africa's chief negotiator for the Cartagena
Protocol and he was scheduled to attend meetings about
the protocol, the United Nations treaty that governs
the international movement of genetically modified organisms.
According to an NGO that has been in contact with
Tewolde, the Canadian Embassy
refused his entry visa and asked him Thursday to answer
questions about his political involvement over the past
35 years.
But Pat Mooney of Etcetera Group, a non-profit organization
that's trying to help Tewolde get into Canada, said
Thursday it's probably Tewolde's views on genetically
modified foods that has the government concerned.
Mooney said Tewolde is an outspoken
critic of the "terminator seeds" that are
engineered to be sterile, requiring farmers to buy new
seeds each growing season. Mooney
also said Tewolde was planning to call for the labelling
of all genetically modified foods.
"Put these two things
together, and the rather remarkable position of the
embassy in blocking his visa, and we have to raise the
question: is there another agenda here?
Is there something going on that's blocking him
from attending the negotiations?" Mooney told CBC.
He said refusing entry to the Ethiopian
scientist may spark an international incident.
"We've heard today from some governments in Africa
that if he's not there, if he's barred from attending,
there could well be a boycott or a protest in Montreal
next week. He is so much the leader that his absence
would almost make it difficult to carry on any negotiations,"
said Mooney.
In 1995, the United Nations decided to locate the
Secretariat for the UN Convention on Biological Diversity
in Montreal. But one of the requirements for hosting
a UN agency is easy access for foreign experts to attend
intergovernmental discussions.
"In barring Dr. Tewolde from participating in
the Montreal meetings, Canada is jeopardizing Montreal's
future as a United Nations city," Eric Darier,
a campaigner with Greenpeace, said in a news release. |
A ZAMBIAN air force plane today
crashed in the west of the country, killing all 13 officers
on board, an official said.
The crash occurred at the town of Mangu, about 500km
west of the capital city of Lusaka.
"The plane crashed three minutes after take-off.
We think the plane developed a fault after take off,"
said Clemence Siame, the permanent secretary of Western
province where Mangu is located.
"There were 13 officers on the plane, including
a woman officer and all of them died," he said. |
BEIJING : Fifty-one miners are
missing and feared dead after a gas explosion ripped
through the Huanerhe coal mine near Chengde city in
northern China's Hebei province. "At around 3 am
on May 19 a gas explosion accident at the Huanerhe mining
company (state-owned local mine) in Hebei province's
Chengde city occurred," the State Administration
of Mine Safety said on its website.
"Fifty-one mine workers were in the mine shaft
and it is not clear if they are alive."
Local and provincial leaders have rushed to the state-owned
mine to oversee rescue operations, while a group of
experts had also been dispatched to investigated the
cause, the administration said.
Local officials contacted by AFP refused to immediately
comment on the explosion or the rescue efforts. [...] |
SANTIAGO, Chile (AP) - Five Chilean
soldiers died and 95 others were missing after a snow
storm trapped an army battalion in the Andes mountains,
an army commander said Thursday.
The battalion was returning from a mountain drill
Wednesday when the storm hit, reducing visibility to
near zero with driving snow, Gen. Emilio Cheyre said.
By early Thursday, 333 members of the 433-soldier
battalion were safe at military installations in the
area, some 500 kilometres south of Santiago, Cheyre
told Radio Cooperativa.
The five soldiers who died were victims of hypothermia,
the army said. [...] |
The first storm of the Pacific
hurricane season spiraled toward Central America's Pacific
coast on Thursday, killing two and forcing thousands
of others from their homes as it gashed the terrain
and soaked the region with rain. The National Hurricane
Center upgraded "Adrian" from a tropical storm
to a Hurricane on Thursday afternoon.
Guatemalan officials declared a "maximum alert"
ahead of Adrian and Salvadoran officials closed schools
and began evacuations Thursday as the hurricane began
to threaten the impoverished Central American nation
and its neighbor Guatemala. Many schools and offices
were closed on Thursday, and some stores were crowded
with people stocking up on water and food.
Both countries declared emergencies as the storm gained
strength, carrying heavy rains that forecasters warned
would likely cause flooding.
A Category I hurricane, Adrian was expected to pick
up pace and the eye of the storm was expected to hit
land late Thursday or early Friday along El Salvador's
northern coast, near the country's capital, San Salvador.
At last report Adrian was about 120 miles southwest
of San Salvador with winds approaching 75 mph with higher
gusts, the National Hurricane Center in Miami reported.
The hurricane center notes that "The biggest threat
from Adrian is the potential for torrential rainfall,
which will likely produce flash flooding and potentially
devastating mud slides over the mountainous terrain
of Central America." [...] |
Powerful thunderstorms had unleashed
ten twisters in Iowa and Minnesota by late Wednesday.
Three of the ten were in Minnesota, where debris was
reported by two law enforcement officials on Highway
29 near Benson in the west-central section of the state.Farther
south, a tornado was on the ground at least 10 minutes
in western Iowa near Fort Dodge. [...] |
QINGYUAN - It's rice-planting season
in China's southern province of Guangdong, but despite
the landscape of flooded fields dotted with green seedlings,
Lian is worried."There is not enough water. There's
rain now, but it's still not enough. There's not enough
water in the reservoir," she says squatting by
the edge of a field, her trousers rolled to the knee
and a broad straw hat hiding her eyes.
The province is recovering from its worst drought
in 50 years, allowing farmers to begin sowing.
The drought in southern China has affected everything
from crops and livelihoods to hydropower.
"Throughout history droughts have happened, but
the frequency and level of severity are increasing because
of climate change," said Yang Ailun, a Greenpeace
climate and energy specialist based in the provincial
capital of Guangzhou.
Even as the rainfall diminishes, consumption is growing
ever higher.
A few kilometres (miles) outside of Guangzhou, smokestacks
give way to fields and stylish city people are replaced
by barefoot farmers.
But the lack of water is affecting both.
Crops are dying and fish farms drying up, while grid
overloads last year forced factories to tap power only
overnight, and led the government to ask restaurants
and hotels to limit use of electric lights.
"In this part of Guangdong and the Pearl River
Delta area, the population is increasing very fast.
Through the 1990s, the economic boom has also driven
up water consumption," said Ma Jun, an environmentalist
and the author of "China's Water Crisis".
"The water consumption rise is staggering,"
he said. [...] |
MOSCOW (Reuters) -
A Russian village was left baffled Thursday after its
lake disappeared overnight.
NTV television showed pictures of a giant muddy hole
bathed in summer sun, while fishermen from the village
of Bolotnikovo looked on disconsolately.
"It is very dangerous. If a person had been in
this disaster, he would have had almost no chance of
survival. The trees flew downwards, under the ground,"
said Dmitry Zaitsev, a local Emergencies Ministry official
interviewed by the channel.
Officials in Nizhegorodskaya region, on the Volga river
east of Moscow, said water in the lake might have been
sucked down into an underground water-course or cave
system, but some villagers had more sinister explanations.
"I am thinking, well, America has finally got
to us," said one old woman, as she sat on the ground
outside her house.
|
WASHINGTON - Eleven states sued
the Bush administration on Wednesday to block new rules
allowing coal-burning utilities to trade rights to emit
toxic mercury, adding to a flurry of lawsuits challenging
the regulations.The core issue in all the lawsuits is
whether the Environmental Protection Agency went far
enough with its March regulations to protect public
health. Mercury contaminates fish and water and has
been linked to neurological disorders in young children.
The EPA regulations rolled out in March ordered US
utilities to cut their emissions of mercury by 70 percent
by 2018 through a cap-and-trade system.
On Wednesday, New Jersey and 10 other states filed
a federal lawsuit in Washington, D.C., saying the cap-and-trade
rules will lead to "hot spots" with concentrated
mercury levels near power plants. That's because polluting
utilities will be able to buy rights to emit the toxin
rather than reduce levels outright.
"These laws are deeply flawed and contrary both
to science and law," said New Jersey Attorney General
Peter Harvey.
EPA officials have downplayed the possibility of hot
spots and the agency said it will "vigorously defend"
the rules against court challenges from states and environmental
groups.
The other states in the lawsuit are California, Connecticut,
Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New
York, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
The nation's 1,100 coal-burning power plants emit
about 48 tons of mercury each year, the largest unregulated
US source. [...] |
Aside from views of cattails and
blackbirds, the marshes in the lower Hudson Valley near
New York City offer an amazingly detailed history of
the area's climate. Sediment layers from a tidal marsh
in the Hudson River Estuary have preserved pollen from
plants, seeds, and other materials. These past remnants
allowed researchers from Columbia University, New York,
N.Y. and NASA to see evidence of a 500 year drought
from 800 A.D. to 1300 A.D., the passing of the Little
Ice Age and the impacts of European settlers.
Plants provide an indicator of climate because the
well-being of a species is controlled by the temperature
and moisture of a region, and whether those conditions
suit a type of plant. That's why if you draw latitudinal
or horizontal lines around the world you'll find very
similar species growing along those lines, like tropical
plants around the equator, or tundra and northern or
boreal forest species in a circumference south of the
North Pole.
From the pollen record found in sediments in Piermont
Marsh of the lower Hudson Valley, a Medieval Warm period
was evident from 800 to 1300 A.D. Researchers know this
from the striking increases in both charcoal, a sign
of dry vegetation and fires, and pollen from pine and
hickory trees. Prior to this warming spell, there were
more oaks, which prefer a wetter climate. [...]
During this drought period, a core drilled into the
marsh bed showed large influxes of inorganic soil particles,
a sign of erosion. Plant roots hold soil in place, but
with drought and plant deaths, more erosion occurs.
Droughts like this also make the bay saltier, and
evidence of this was found by an increase in salty marsh
plants, like saltmarsh cordgrass. The changing salinity
of the marshes and estuaries could present future water
quality issues in the event of a drought. For example,
heading north up the Hudson River, the city of Poughkeepsie
draws its municipal water directly from the river. Because
the salinity of the river changes with drought, causing
saltier water to move further north, salinity changes
have the potential to affect the water supply of the
city.
During the Little Ice Age from
the early 1400s to late 1800s, the vegetation changed
again to plants that favored cooler and wetter climates.
The core records revealed increases in spruce and hemlock
that prefer cooler and wetter climates.
Similarly, when Europeans settled the area they cleared
the forests for agriculture. The pollen record reflects
this with a vast decline in tree pollen and an increase
in pollen from weedy plants like ragweed, plantain,
sorrel and dock. Inorganic soil particles also went
up following European settlement.
Peteet points out that researchers could use these
methods to similarly learn about climate in other parts
of the world. |
WASHINGTON, D.C. – A former
NASA astronaut will call on the U.S. Congress to evaluate
an asteroid with a small chance of hitting Earth in
2036 and suggest lawmakers consider a space mission
to monitor the object, SPACE.com has learned.
Russell Schweickart arrives here today to make his
case. He'll also ask Congress to assign to a government
agency the responsibility of protecting the public from
space rocks.
The call to action stems from an orbiting hunk of
stone that for a few days around Christmas had scientists
on the edges of their seats.
The asteroid, named 2004 MN4, was found last year.
It orbits the Sun but crosses the path of Earth. In
December, preliminary observations showed it might strike
in 2029, according to NASA scientists. It briefly had
the highest odds ever assigned to a possible collision.
Further investigation ruled out the 2029 impact scenario,
but scientists cannot yet rule out an impact in 2036.
The odds of a collision in 2036 are about 1-in-10,000,
Schweickart says.
In fact, there are several scenarios between 2034
and 2065 in which 2004 MN4 has even smaller odds of
striking. Schweickart and other scientists stress, however,
that future observations are likely to reduce all these
odds to zero.
Time to act
Meanwhile, Schweickart thinks the time to act is now.
SPACE.com was provided a copy of the paper Schweickart
will present. In it, he carries out an informal analysis
of the situation. He notes that the asteroid will be
mostly out of view from 2006 to 2012. When it re-emerges,
fresh observation will likely reduce the 2036 impact
chance to zero, he said.
"However, there is a slim chance that we will
not be able to draw this conclusion and that an impact
will still be possible," he writes.
"One of the first things I’m calling for
is validation and checking of the analysis I’ve
gone through and the conclusions that fall out of my
work," Schweickart told SPACE.com.
Schweickart heads up the B612 Foundation, which since
2003 has advocated for more research and action to protect
Earth from stray asteroids.
Call to action
Should his analysis prove correct after formal study,
Schweickart says serious consideration should be given
to first placing a radio transponder on the asteroid
in order to better track its whereabouts.
The former Apollo astronaut will take his message
to Congressional lawmakers and detail his concerns at
the International Space Development Conference being
held here this week by the National Space Society, a
space advocacy organization.
Astronomers agree that sooner
or later Earth will be struck by a damaging asteroid.
While one could sneak up on us any day, the overwhelming
odds are that any potential significant impact will
be known years in advance.
NASA has been charged by Congress with finding potentially
hazardous space rocks. Yet only last year, after a separate
brief scare, did officials formalize lines of communication
between NASA's top brass and the astronomers who find
and monitor space rocks.
Still, there are no formal lines of communication
between NASA and the White House to handle an imminent
threat. And there is no U.S. agency to which the issue
of protection of the public and property from the impact
of near-Earth asteroids is assigned, Schweickart points
out. Who would decide on whether and how to deflect
an incoming threat? What agencies would be mobilized
to deal with an impact?
The U.S. Congress should take action and assign that
responsibility, he said. [...] |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|