|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
The
Mechanical Popularity Of Lies |
SOTT
24/02/05 |
|
Jim
Meigs - some 'conspiracy nuts' took a pot shot at
one of the sacred cows he shares with millions of
his fellow Americans, and he got so worked up that
he commissioned an article and published it on Popular
Mechanics to calm himself down. He feels better now,
especially since he has been on CNN to talk about
it too. |
In case you didn't hear, the materialistically-obsessed
people over at Popular
Mechanics, under the tutelage of Editor in Chief Jim
"Oh look, a tank!" Meigs, assembled a team of
researchers, including "professional fact checkers"
(impressive eh?) to debunk the 16 most common claims made
by conspiracy theorists about 9/11.
Praise the Lord! The truth can't be far behind.
Unsurprisingly, the PM editors claim that, in the end:
"we were able to debunk each of these assertions
with hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense.
We learned that a few theories are based on something
as innocent as a reporting error on that chaotic day.
Others are the byproducts of cynical imaginations that
aim to inject suspicion and animosity into public debate."
In fact, at most 3 of the 16 claims could have been the
result of "reporting error", forcing us to assume
that, in the razor-like emotionally unclouded cerebrum
of Jim Meigs, at least 13 of the conspiracy claims about
9/11 are the result of "cynical imaginations aiming
to inject suspicion and animosity into public debate".
Those dirty, cynical, animosity and suspicion-injecting
conspiracy theorists! WHY!? Why do they do it! There really
should be a law! Well, don't fret Jim, we hear there's
one in the pipeline.
The sad fact is that, while Popular Mechanics claims
to be interested in understanding what really happened
that day, their rebuttal of 16 of the most common claims
by conspiracy theorists about 9/11 isn't worth the $3.57
of server space that it has so far cost them to publish
it.
If there is one glaring and common hole in the arguments
put forward by 9/11 conspiracy "debunkers",
it is the fact that such people have NEVER come up with
a reasonable argument to explain WHY, in the wake of 9/11,
so many obviously intelligent citizens became gripped
by the uncontrollable urge to continually waste their
time recklessly and fecklessly "injecting suspicion
and animosity into public debate" for no apparent
reason. It really is a mystery. Maybe they're trying to
take over the world or something.
On the other hand, it doesn't take a degree in psychology
to understand the primary motivations of the conspiracy
debunkers.
You see, the very last thing that many Americans (and
others) WANT to believe is that their government would
attack its own people. For 9/11 "debunkers",
logic and intellect have NO part to play in investigating
the question of what really happened on 9/11. It's pure
emotion all the way.
In the beginning, on the morning of September 11, 2001
we were all united in our emotional reactions: shock,
horror, grief - and jubilation from a bunch of Israeli
Mossad agents. As the emotion subsided, most went on with
their lives, but a few stood on, brows furrowed, scratching
their heads. After considerable digging and research,
it became obvious that the official story did not answer
all of the questions, and the fact that officials were
refusing to answer those outstanding questions, gave rise,
logically enough, to a conspiracy theory. Not long thereafter,
the debunkers stepped in, NOT because they had the answers
to the outstanding questions, but because they had their
emotional buttons severely poked by the fact that someone
was saying that their government was lying!
You see the problem here. Kind of frustrating, isn't
it?
Sadly, the editors at PM are no different, and their
little fear-inspired rebuttal of 9/11 conspiracy theories
is of little actual use to ANYONE, least of all to those
who really do want to know the truth of 9/11. Far from
approaching the matter with an open mind (which is crucial
in any attempt to find the truth) , it is clear that Popular
Mechanics' "professional fact checkers" BEGAN
with the premise that the US government was NOT lying
about the main events of 9/11.
From there, the objectivity and integrity of their research
went sharply downhill as they busied themselves with hunting
down the VERY SAME SOURCES THAT PROVIDED THE OFFICIAL
STORY to confirm that the official story was in fact correct.
Apparently, in debunkerland, it is completely reasonable
to ask US government representatives to testify that the
US government is squeaky clean and then present that evidence
as "fact". It is also kosher, we assume, to
have a murder suspect double as a credible court's witness
in a murder trial.
For those of you who have looked unemotionally at the
events of 9/11, it is not unusual to be left wondering
how those members of the US government who were clearly
complicit in the murder of 3,000 of their own citizens
can remain so smug and seemingly self-assured. To find
the answer we need look no further than the Jim Meigs'
of this world.
You see, it is people like Meigs who lack any love or
appreciation for the truth and worship only their subjective
view of the world that make it so easy for big government
to commit big crime. At present there are millions of
Americans and others around the world who, aided by the
years of social conditioning and media mind programming,
drew a very clear line around what they would and would
not believe about their government and country. Most of
what was inside the line was "feel good" stuff
about "greatest democracy on earth" and other
jingoistic nonsense, with perhaps a few admissions that
"sometimes bad things happen" and "not
everyone is a saint". This mindset provided (and
continues to provide) a perfect opportunity for unscrupulous
US politicians to literally get away with the murder of
which most of the US public refuse to believe they were
capable.
The result is that for all intents and purposes, today
there are two Americas:
- The America of the average American citizen which is
little more than a government-provided dream world
- The real America of the corrupt politicians and the
select few who run the country, and much of the world
Luckily for the select few, this second, real America
just happens to lie outside of what many ordinary Americans
are willing or able to believe is possible. Lest anyone
think otherwise, the setting up of any accusation against
government as being the domain of "conspiracy nuts"
is not the result of pure coincidence. Conspiracy theories
are as old as the first lie ever told, and the subsequent
attempts by the liar to avoid exposure. Most people think
that "conspiracy theories" are made up by "conspiracy
theorists", but the term "conspiracy theory"
is most often used by those people who have most to gain
from the ridicule of the allegations that are directed
at them. The tactic has been used to such great effect
over the years that certain high crimes committed by government
have become the touchstone by which all other "conspiracies"
are measured.
Take the folks at Popular Mechanics. In dealing with
9/11 they simply couldn't resist referencing that other
most despicable crime committed by a US government - but
of course, to them it just another "theory":
Don't get me wrong: Healthy skepticism is a good thing.
Nobody should take everything they hear--from the government,
the media or anybody else--at face value. But in a culture
shaped by Oliver Stone movies and "X-Files"
episodes, it is apparently getting harder for simple,
hard facts to hold their own against elaborate, shadowy
theorizing.
Did you catch it? The reference to Oliver Stone can mean
only one thing: Jim's "fact checkers" contacted
the CIA and they told him straight up that some bullets
really can do magic things.
In closing, if you happen to stop by at the sorry article
in question, don't be fooled or intimidated by the word
"SCIENCE" in big bold letters on the Popular
Mechanics page. In Europe, McDonald's drink cups have
the words "I'm loving it" emblazoned across
them in various languages, regardless of what you put
in them.
Credit by association or juxtaposition is one of the
oldest tricks in the book of mass mind programming. Just
because "they" say it, don't make it so. This
simple, logical statement is a salient lesson for us all
in these heady days where disinformation masquerades as
truth and even "innocent" fun-loving "boys
with toys" have become obedient workers in the lie
factory. |
A PALESTINIAN suicide
bomber killed at least five people and injured more than
30 at a nightclub in Tel Aviv last night, shattering a
de facto truce by militants that had raised hopes of a
peace deal being struck in the Middle East.
The Islamic Jihad faction initially claimed responsibility
for the blast, but militants in the Al Aqsa Martyrs'
Brigades, a group with ties to Palestinian leader Mahmoud
Abbas's Fatah movement, said the Lebanese guerrilla
group Hezbollah was involved.
The various militant groups behind suicide bombings and
other attacks against Israel in a four and a half year
old uprising have followed a de facto truce for several
weeks.
But they had said they were not bound by the ceasefire
agreed by Palestinian president Abbas and the Israeli
prime minister, Ariel Sharon, at a summit in Egypt on
8 February.
The new attack will seriously damage hopes for some kind
of Middle East peace deal that have been growing since
president Abbas and prime minister Sharon met. [...]
Israeli television showed hundreds of people milling
about the area, as rescuers took away people in stretchers.
One woman sat bloody and dazed in a wheelchair as she
was wheeled off.
The Tel Aviv promenade where The Stage nightclub is located
has been hit before by Palestinian militants, including
explosions outside the Dolphinarium disco and Mike's
Place, a popular pub.
Palestinian officials immediately condemned
the attack.
"Whoever is behind it is seriously
attempting to sabotage the efforts being exerted to revive
the peace process, and should not be allowed to succeed,"
said the chief Palestinian negotiator, Saeb Erekat.
An Israeli official said the latest attack showed the
need for the Palestinians to "dismantle terror groups".
"Without dismantling the terror groups there will
be no progress in the region," said a senior foreign
ministry official, Gideon Meir. |
A blast has ripped
through a seaside discotheque in Tel Aviv, killing at
least four people and wounding another 50.
Tel Aviv's police chief David Tzur said the attack late
on Friday took place at the entrance to the disco, called
The Stage.
"A single terrorist exploded in a line of people
waiting to get into the club," Tzur said.
Islamic Jihad, Hamas and al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades - an
offshoot of the mainstream Fatah movement - all
have denied responsibility for the explosion.
Some Israeli security sources
have suggested that the Lebanese Hizb Allah might be to
blame for the attack, Aljazeera reported on Saturday.
[...]
Chief Palestinian neogiator Saib Uraiqat
also condemned the attack, saying it undermined Palestinian
interests, but appealed to the international community
to ensure that Israel did not use the attack as an excuse
to launch a major operation in occupied territories.
"We are asking the international community to move
immediately to ensure that Israel does not use this kind
of operation as an excuse for aggressions against the
Palestinian people," he said.
Sami Abu Zuhri, a spokesman for
the resistance group Hamas, said the organisation was
"fully observing the period of quiet as we told Abu
Mazin (Mahmud Abbas) at our last meeting in Gaza". |
Lebanese Shiite movement
Hezbollah says it had nothing to do with an overnight
suicide bombing in Tel Aviv that killed four Israelis
and wounded 53 people.
"Hezbollah categorically denies the accusations
of a supposed role by our movement in the Tel Aviv operation
and considers them totally without basis," said a
statement from the group. |
America's neo-conservative
elite and their collaborators in the pro-Israel lobby
in Washington have fired a first shot in the opening guns
of a new Cold War being launched against Russian Premier
Vladimir Putin.
Although it hasn't been reported widely
in the America mass media, Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.)
and Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), two of the Israeli lobby's
leading congressional stalwarts, introduced a resolution
in the Senate on February 19, condemning Putin and urging
President Bush to push for suspending Russia's membership
in the G-8 group of industrial nations.
Latching on to the president's emphatic declaration
in his January 20 inaugural address of a new global campaign
by the United States for the promotion of "democracy."
Lieberman announced that "President Putin's
assault on democracy in Russia violates the spirit of
the industrialized democracies and the letter of Russia's
obligations to the Group of Eight. We must openly confront
anti-democratic backsliding in Russia for the sake of
all those who look to the United States as a beacon for
freedom." The resolution was designed to put President
Bush on the spot, coming just as President Bush was preparing
for his scheduled meeting with Putin in Slovakia on February
24.
The motivation for the effort by the neo-conservatives
and their congressional spokesmen to undermine Putin is
quite clear, inasmuch as Putin recently challenged Bush
and Israel by daring to say publicly that he (Putin) does
not believe that Iran is seeking to building nuclear weapons
of mass destruction.
Although the burgeoning hostility against
Putin by the neo-conservatives has been widely hashed
over in small-circulation pro-Israel publications and
American Jewish community newspapers on a regular basis,
it has only been of recent date that mainstream publications
such as The Washington Post and and The New York Times,
to name the most prominent, have begun to echo those concerns
about Putin, almost as if the big name dailies were taking
the lead from the other journals. Increasingly, however,
the word that "Putin is a possible enemy" is
now being breached to the average American, through the
outlets of the mass media.
Although Russia joined the G-8 nations (which includes
Britain, Canada, Japan, France, Italy and Germany) in
2002, the companion resolutions in the Senate and the
House ask the president to enlist the other G-8 countries
to join with the United States in suspending Russia's
G-8 membership until such time as
President Bush decides that Russia is supposedly
committed to so-called "democratic principles."
[...]
Reflecting on the fact that the media was increasingly
promoting hostility to Putin, American Free Press noted
on October 25, 2004 that the media's primary concern
about Putin stems from the fact that he has been moving
against the handful of billionaire plutocrats in Russia
(many of whom also hold Israeli citizenship) who grabbed
control of the Russian economy with the open-connivance
of then-Russian leader Boris Yeltsin, following the collapse
of the old Soviet Union.
One American hard-line pro-Israel publication, The New
Republic, raised the question on September 24, 2004: "Is
Russia going fascist?" asserting that whether Putin
personally remains in power or not, there is a growing
movement "nationalist" in nature—that
holds great sway among the Russian population. TNR
expressed concern that "a fascist revolution"
could be in the offing, meaning a movement hostile to
the Israeli oligarchs (with international criminal connections)
who rule the Russian economic scene. Likewise,
much earlier, in his 1995 book, Russia: A Return to
Imperialism, Boston-University-based Israeli academic
Uri Ra'anan sounded the concern that post-Soviet Russia
may pose a threat to the West. [...]
Essentially, with the American
neo-conservatives (whose ideological godfathers are widely
known as admitted ex-Trotskyite communists) now moving
against Putin, it is as if we are seeing a rejuvenation
of the war against Russian nationalism by the Trotskyites,
retooled for 21st century geopolitical considerations.
Now—unlike in the first half of the 20th century
prior to the founding of the state of Israel—the
central role of that Middle East state in the neo-conservative
worldview cannot be understated, for the concern about
Israel is a front-line consideration in the neo-conservative
campaign against Putin. |
Eleven
Years Ago
MASSACRE
IN IBRAHIMI MOSQUE IN HEBRON
50 DEAD AND SEVERAL HUNDRED INJURED
BY JEWISH SETTLER AND SOLDIERS |
Palestine Human Rights Information
Center - PRELIMINARY INFORMATION - February 25, 1994 |
An Israeli settler
wearing a military uniform, Baruch Goldstein, a well-known
Kach leader and a physician from Kiryat Arba settlement
in Hebron, entered the Ibrahimi mosque and emptied two
clips of a machinegun into Moslem worshippers during the
dawn prayer. Initial casualty figures are unconfirmed
because the Hebron area is under curfew and injured people
have been transferred to more than six hospitals in the
area. At least 48 were killed in the initial shooting
(received by hospitals and confirmed by name), but estimates
are that between 50 and 60 Palestinians may have been
killed. More than 300 are injured. Some of them were critically
injured by the high-velocity ammunition. |
It is wrong to assume
that the mass murder in Hebron stemmed only from the opinions
of a small group of extremists on the fringe of the Israeli
political spectrum, the supporters of the late Meir Kahane.
The ideology which inspired the
killings is the same as that of the "Jewish Underground"
of 1984. The members if this movement, who attempted
to blow up the mosques of the Temple Mount, were caught
red-handed while fixing bombs, timed to explode exactly
on the beginning of the Sabbath, to nine Arab buses, so
as to avoid the killing of any pious Jew. Daniel Ben-Simon
(Davar, 27 February) quotes,for the first time, the real
aims of the "Jewish Underground", and compares
them with the better known aims of Kahane.
While interrogating one "Jewish
Underground" member, the Shin Bet were stunned by
the downright Satanic idea underlying the plan to demolish
the mosques on the Temple Mount. As the man explained
to his interrogators, "the demolition of these mosques
would have infuriated all the hundreds of millions of
Muslims in the world. Their rage would inevitably have
led to a war which in all likelihood would have escalated
into a world war. In such a war the scale of casualties
would be formidable enough to promote the process of Redemption
of the Jews and the Land of Israel. All the Muslims would
by then disappear, which means that everything would be
ready for the coming of the Messiah."
On the other hand, says Ben-Simon, "in one of his
12 books, Kahane justified the extermination of the Arabs
as the surest way to bring about the "True Redemption
of the Jews". The Redemption can occur in all its
splendour, even right now, if all Jews resolve to keep
the Commandments of the Lord. But the Redemption can also
proceed through tragedy if the Jews refuse to obey the
Lord. The difference is that True Redemption implies that
the Jews cast away their fear of the Gentiles and fear
only the Lord; which in turn means that they expel all
the Arabs from the Land of Israel. So in order to bring
on the Redemption we should expel all the Arabs."
The Philosophy of Gush Emunim
The sympathy which Baruch Goldstein enjoys among the
Gush Emunim, whose influence is more pervasive than that
of the Kahanists, can only be explained by a shared ideology.
However, Gush Emunim leaders enjoy Rabin's friendship
and strong influence in wide circles of the Israeli and
diaspora Jewish communities. Therefore it is their version
of this ideology which is more important. Gush
Emunim's thinking assumes the imminence of the coming
of the Messiah, when the Jews, aided by God, will triumph
over the Gentiles. Consequently, all current political
developments call be interpreted by those in the know
as destined either to bring this end nearer or postpone
it. Jewish sins, the worst of them being lack of faith
in Gush Emunim ideology, can postpone but not alter the
predestined course of Redemption. The two world wars,
the Holocaust and other calamitous events of modern history
serve as stock examples of such a curative punishment
for Jewish sins. Such explanations can go into a lot of
specific detail. The rabbi of Kiryat Arba, Dov Lior (who
attended Goldstein's funeral and praised him), blamed
Israel's relative failure in its 1982 invasion of Lebanon
on the lack of faith manifested through signing a peace
treaty with Egypt and "returning the inheritance
of our ancestors [i.e Sinai] to strangers". I will
proceed to quote from two English-language books on the
subject: For the Land and the Lord, Jewish Fundamentalism
in Israel, By Ian Lustick (Council on Foreign Relations,
New York 1988), and the chapter on nationalist Judaism
in Yehoshafat Harkabi's Israel Fateful Decisions
(I.B.Tauris, London 1988, reviewed in MEI 331).
The fundamental tenet of Gush Emunim's
thinking is the assumption that the Jewish people are
"peculiar". Lustick discusses this tenet in
terms of their denial of the classical Zionist claim that
only by undergoing "a process of normalisation",
by emigrating to Palestine and forming a Jewish state
there, can the Jews become like any other nation. But
for them this "is the original delusion of the secular
Zionists", because they measured that "normality"
by applying non-Jewish standards. According to Gush Emunim,
"Jews are not and cannot be a normal people",
because "their eternal uniqueness" is "the
result of the covenant God made with them at Mount Sinai".
Therefore, according to Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, one of their
leaders, "while God requires other normal nations
to abide by abstract codes of 'justice and righteousness',
such laws do not apply to Jews".
Harkabi quotes Rabbi Israel Ariel,
who says that "a Jew who kills a non-Jew is exempt
from human judgement, and has not violated the prohibition
of murder". The Gush Emunim rabbis have indeed reiterated
that Jews who kill Arabs should be free from all punishment.
Harkabi also quotes Rabbi Aviner, Rabbi Zvi Yehudah
Kook and Rabbi Ariel, all three of whom say Arabs living
in Palestine are thieves because since the land was once
Jewish, all property to be found on that land "really"
belongs to the Jews. In the original Hebrew version of
his book Harkabi expresses his shock at finding this out.
"I never imagined that Israelis would so interpret
the concept of the historical right."
All we need is war
Let me omit the many other horrifying facets of Gush
Emunim ideology except one comment of Harkabi which I
find particularly prescient. Proponents of the view that
due to God's help Israel is stronger than all other nations
hold that "Israel need have
no fear of future wars, and can even provoke them at will.
Rabbi Shlomo Aviner wrote: "We must live in this
land even at the price of war. Moreover, even if there
is peace, we must instigate wars of liberation in order
to conquer it."
It must be borne in mind that, for Gush Emunim, the
"Jewish heritage" to be "liberated"
is much greater than just Palestine. Rabbi Ariel was far-sighted
enough to publish an atlas in which all the lands to be
"liberated" (according to diverse rabbinical
interpretations) are clearly marked. All the areas west
and south of the Euphrates (i.e. including Kuwait) are
included, and Ariel also shows rabbinical "interpretations"
even more far-reaching than this unanimous view. Suppose
Gush Emunim were ever able to use Israeli nuclear power.
It is not difficult to guess what purpose it would be
used for.
Harkabi and Lustick make it clear that Gush Emunim assumes
that the reason for Arab hostility towards the Jews are
theological in nature. Hence the conclusion that the Arab-Israeli
conflict cannot he resolved politically. Lustick quotes
a prominent rabbi, Eliezar Waldman, then a Knesset member,
now the director of the main yeshiva in Kiryat Arba, who
said "that by fighting the
Arabs, Israel carries out its divine misssion to serve
as the heart of the world" and to save it, "while
Arab hostility springs like all anti-Semitism, from the
world's recalcitrance" against being saved by the
Jews, or even from Arabs seeding "to fulfil their
collective death-wish".
Gush Emunim's plans for governing non-Jews in Israel
are also based on "theological" principles.
According to Rabbi Aviner; "Is
there a difference between punishing an Arab child and
an Arab adult for disturbance of our peace? Punishments
can be inflicted on Jewish boys below the age of 13 and
Jewish girls below the age of 12...But this rule applies
to Jews alone, not to Gentiles. Thus any Gentile, no matter
how little, should be punished for any crime he commits."
From this dictum, it is only a short step to slaughtering
Arab children.
Even Israel's Supreme Court compared Kahane to the German
Nazis. The prominet Orthodox dissident, Professor Yeshayahu
Leibovitz, said that the mass murder in Hebron was a consequence
of "Judeo-Nazism". But Gush Emunim's ideology
is no less like that of the Nazis than Kahane's. |
This page has long
been very wary of any moves by the Israeli government
to further consolidate land it seized after the 1967 war
without negotiations with the Palestinians. So we were
a little queasy about the way Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
coupled his plans to withdraw Jewish settlers from the
Gaza Strip with further work on the barrier that Israel
is constructing to block itself off from its Palestinian
neighbors.
Some Sharon observers are already likening the Gaza pullout
to a chessboard-worthy move. Seen in that light, Mr. Sharon
is sacrificing Gaza in return for the world's acceptance
of Israel's "de facto annexation of 7 percent of
West Bank territory," as a political columnist, Nahum
Barnea, theorized in Yediot Aharonot, a Hebrew-language
daily. "Sharon has not become a dove," Mr. Barnea
wrote. "He has remained what he always was: a pragmatic
hawk."
But
whatever bird Mr. Sharon has chosen to emulate, it would
be churlish to greet his historic decision with anything
other than enthusiasm. The prime minister has risked enormous
political capital in boldly going where his predecessors
feared to tread: agreeing to evacuate settlements without
first wringing something out of the Palestinians.
Thanks to Mr. Sharon's efforts, optimism and hope is
spreading throughout Israel, and that can only be a good
thing. It gives a boost to the Palestinian president,
Mahmoud Abbas, and it further isolates Mr. Sharon's right-wing
Likud Party members, particularly the finance minister,
Benjamin Netanyahu, and the minister for Jerusalem affairs,
Natan Sharansky.
The barrier remains troublesome. Its route was revised
following a court order last year, which rightly said
it imposed too many hardships on Palestinian civilians,
many of whom were blocked from getting to work or visiting
relatives. The new path of the barrier,
Israeli officials say, will reduce the amount of West
Bank land on the Israeli side of the fence to 7 percent
from 15 percent. That's certainly better than the original
plan. But the new path should not be treated as
a permanent boundary when the time comes for peace talks
about a final settlement with the Palestinians. The land
that Israel has enclosed should remain on the bargaining
table. Barriers are easy to construct, and should be just
as easy to tear down.
Mr. Sharon has shown enormous political courage: he is
keeping his majority coalition together by the skin of
his teeth, and that coalition may not last to see the
successful end of the Gaza withdrawal. We hope that it
does, and that Mr. Sharon coordinates this historic withdrawal
with the Palestinian Authority in a way that leaves impoverished
Gaza with enough resources to allow the Palestinians to
show the world that they can govern themselves. |
If Syria killed Rafik
Hariri, Lebanon's former prime minister and mastermind
of its revival after the civil war, it must be judged
an act of political suicide. Syria is already under great
international pressure from the US, France and Israel.
To kill Hariri at this critical moment would be to destroy
Syria's reputation once and for all and hand its enemies
a weapon with which to deliver the blow that could finally
destabilise the Damascus regime, and even possibly bring
it down.
So attributing responsibility for the murder to Syria
is implausible. The murder is more
likely to be the work of one of its many enemies.
This is not to deny that Syria has made grave mistakes
in Lebanon. Its military intelligence apparatus has interfered
far too much in Lebanese affairs. [...]
Hariri was not a diehard enemy of Syria. For 10 of the
past 12 years he served as Lebanon's prime minister under
Syria's aegis. A few days before his murder on February
14 he held a meeting with Syria's deputy foreign minister,
Walid Muallim. They were reported to have discussed a
forthcoming visit by Hariri to Damascus. Hariri had not
officially joined the opposition in Lebanon, but was thought
to be attempting to mediate between Syria and the opposition.
If Syria did not kill Hariri, who could have? There is
no shortage of potential candidates, including far-right
Christians, anxious to rouse opinion against Syria and
expel it from Lebanon; Islamist extremists who have not
forgiven Syria its repression of the Muslim Brotherhood
in the 80s; and, of course, Israel.
Israel's ambition has long been to weaken
Syria, sever its strategic alliance with Iran and destroy
Hizbullah. Israel has great experience at "targeted
assassinations" - not only in the Palestinian territories
but across the Middle East. Over the years, it has sent
hit teams to kill opponents in Beirut, Tunis, Malta, Amman
and Damascus.
Syria, Hizbullah and Iran have
stood up against US and Israeli hegemony over the region.
Syria continues to demand that Israel return the Golan
Heights, seized in 1967. Damascus will not allow Lebanon
to conclude a separate peace with Israel unless its own
claim is also addressed.
Hizbullah, in turn, is possibly the only Arab force to
have inflicted a defeat on Israel. Its guerrillas forced
Israel out of south Lebanon after a 22-year occupation.
Hizbullah continues to be a big irritant to Israel because
it has acquired a deterrent capability. Israel can no
longer attack Lebanon with impunity - as it did for decades
- without risking a riposte from Hizbullah rockets. [...]
The US and Israel have also been urging European governments
to declare Hizbullah a "terrorist organisation".
France has its own quarrel with Syria, and President Jacques
Chirac is outraged at the murder of his close friend Hariri,
but Paris does not consider Hizbullah a terrorist organisation.
For France, and for the vast majority of Arabs, Hizbullah
is a national liberation movement as well as a big political
actor in Lebanon.
There is far more to this crisis than a struggle between
rival clans in Lebanon. |
The
Presidents Shared Common Values
Vladimir Putin and George Bush Have Not Reached Agreement
on Principal Matter |
by Andrey Kolesnikov, Bratislava
Kommersant
February 25, 2005 |
The President of Russia, Vladimir
Putin, and the President of the United States, George
Bush, met in Bratislava on February 24. The sixteenth
summit of the two leaders had, just as all previous
ones, a happy ending. The presidents openly demonstrated
that their personal friendship is more important than
all and sundry controversies. But they did not reach
agreement on the principal question of the fate of democracy
in Russia, which was the key issue at the summit. Kommersant
special correspondent Andrey Kolesnikov has the details.
[...]
President Bush arrived to the palace from the central
square of Bratislava where he addressed representatives
of the Slovak working people at a big rally.
He flew into Slovakia's capital on the previous evening.
"The Slovak Spectator" newspaper on the eve
of his arrival published the headline on its front page
which read "This Visit Will Mark Us on the Map".
The Slovaks get offended that most people always confuse
them with Slovenians. The Bush – Putin meeting
should have corrected everything. However, everything
has again ended in confusion. On
the day of President Bush's arrival the newspaper "USA
Today" printed a map of Europe on which the country
where he was to meet President Putin was, alas, again
Slovenia. A Slovak lady-journalist walked about
the international press centre, with tears in her eyes,
showing the map to her colleagues silently. She couldn't
even speak.
After George Bush landed in Bratislava Airport mishaps
continued. Instead of taxiing up to the carpet on which
numerous journalists stood with TV and photo cameras
at the ready, the plane of the US President was stopped
by the Slovak organizers of the meeting some one hundred
metres away from it for the sake of observing additional
safety measures so that the corresponding security services
(and journalists, too) could better prepare for their
work.
The plane stood still and nobody knew
what to do for a whole half-hour. Their American colleagues
told them that the plane wouldn't move and Mr. Bush
would not alight. Only then was it decided to move the
carpet and journalists closer to the plane. The officials
followed suit.
When the US President finally alighted from the plane,
Slovaks took off their gloves and prepared to shake
hands with him. Mr. Bush remained
in gloves, but greeted all present and shook hands with
them cordially. However,
it turned out that he greeted not the official persons
who came to meet him, but those who accompanied those
officials. Mr. Bush, slighly irritated, asked to show
him who he should actually greet. And when they were
found at last, he remained in gloves. The Slovak public
noted this.
On the following day Slovak public representatives
gathered for a meeting on the central square of the
capital. People were let in by special invitation cards
and it was said that they were distributed freely among
Bratislava workers at industrial enterprises. Besides,
each person wishing to attend the meeting could get
a ticket at the mayor's office. Part of them was definitely
sold for money, for it is hard to believe that workers
could obtain free tickets to the VIP stand right behind
the back of Mr. Bush.
The US President was thirty minutes
late. People on the square became frozen stiff. But
their faces showed no signs of irritation, and they
held American and Slovak flags which were handed them
at the entrance to the square.
One American journalist was visibly
moved and said: "Look, there's still a country
where people are happy to see us."
When Mr. Bush finally appeared and
began to speak, something unexpected happened. People
gathered on the square removed the flags and unfolded
posters with inscriptions: "All this is downright
lie!", "Bush is serial killer!", "How
should we write the word terrorist'? – Write Bush',
there's no mistake!"
Of course, the organizers of this public meeting for
the President of the United States have gone a bit too
much as far as this new form of contacts with rank-and-file
citizens was concerned. Meanwhile, he said quite correct
things. He congratuled the Ukrainian people on their
gaining freedom and expresed the hope that in ten days'
time the Moldavian people would follow suit. "And
the day will come when Belarus is free!" the American
President promised his Slovak audience.
The square was cordoned off by Slovak policemen among
whom there were quite a few Afro-Americans with a Texan
touch. And in another corner
of the square an anti-American meeting was in progress
and the speakers there sometimes muffled the speech
of the US President. True, there were no antagonistic
contradictions between the participants in the two meetings.
[...]
The American President was sparing in words. In his
view, the presidents during their talks have agreed
to protect nuclear weapons from attacks (evidentlly,
they are now defenceless as never before).
"Vladimir clearly understands what is at stake,"
Mr. Bush said. "He, just like us, faced the need
to defend his country from serious attacks (evidently,
he had in mind Beslan. – A.K.). And as a colleague-leader
I well understand him." [...]
"Democracies have much in common,"
he said. "Protection of the minorities, the freedom
of speech…Vladimir and I didn't reach full consensus
on all these questions."
He finished speaking and got the better of himself.
"Russia is ready for reasonable compromises,"
Vladimir Putin said in reply. True, he had in mind negotiations
on entering WTO. In his view, there should be no complaints
about Russian-American cooperation in the sphere of
liquefied gas. [...]
Mr. Putin, as usual, answering questions said that
Russia had once made its democratic choice and this
choice was final, because it was not his, Putin's choice,
but that of the people of Russia."
I asked the next question. Perhaps, I should have asked
about interaction in Iran and Iraq. Possibly, there
were people in the hall who expected it. But a philosophical
argument followed about the fate of democracy and it
was awkward to interrupt it in the middle. I
said that in my view there is nothing to argue about
for the two presidents: the regimes in our two countries
can hardly be termed democratic (especially compared
with certain European countries, for instance, the Netherlands).
As for Russia, I said, everything is clear, whereas
for the United States, one can speak of the growing
influence of the special services on private life. Yes,
it happened after September 11, 2001, but does it have
anything to do with democracy?
In conclusion, I suggested that the
presidents agree with all this, shake hands and continue
their friendship.
This was rather immodest. But to justify myself, I'd
say that nobody present at the press conference was
distinguished with modesty.
The presidents did not agree, for some reason or other.
Mr. Bush tried to interrupt me
several times, showing by jestures that he understood
everything.
He explained that America had given its people and
the peoples of the world the main thing – freedom
and the democratic laws which protect this freedom.
"Ours is a democratic country,"
he declared.
True, it cannot be said that he tried to answer my
question.
Mr. Putin did not agree that something is wrong with
democracy in Russia either.
"Democracy is not anarchy,"
he declared, "it is not permission to do and say
whatever one pleases." [...]
A journalist from "Interfax" Agency asked
why Mr. Putin doesn't raise his voice in defence of
American journalists at his meetings with the US President.
He had in mind several journalists working at CNN who
were fired recently.
"I don't know what journalists you mean,"
Mr. Bush shrugged his shoulders. "You in the hall,
do you still have jobs?"
He smiled so radiantly that it was
seen with a naked eye that he was greatly displeased.
"I'm glad for you," the US
President said to the "Interfax" correspondent,
"if you believe that everything is OK with journalists
in Russia. This point of view is quite interesting to
us. I'm glad to hear your editorial comment and feel
your comfort and confidence on the score."
Mr. Bush did not restrain himself from mockery. The
last question definitely displeased him. He got offended
and because of that may cease to defend us. |
As the criminal, sinful war in
Iraq enters its third year, the president goes to Europe
to heal the wounds between the United States and its
former allies, on his own terms of course. The White
House propaganda mill will hail it as another victory
for the president and ignore the fact that most Europeans
still consider the war dangerous folly and the president
a dangerous fool.
One hears new rationalizations for the war on this
side of the Atlantic. After the hearings on Secretary
of State Rice, a Republican senator, with all the self-righteous
anger that characterizes many such, proclaimed,
"The Democrats just have to understand that the
president really believed there were weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq." This justification
is not unlike the one heard frequently at the White
House, "The president believed the intelligence
agencies of the world."
Would it not be much better to
have a president who deliberately lied to the people
because he thought a war was essential than to have
one who was so dumb as to be taken in by intelligence
agencies, especially those who told him what he wanted
to hear?
It is also asserted that the election settled the matters
of the war and the torture of prisoners. These are dead
issues that no longer need be addressed. Yet the president
received only 51 percent of the vote and carried only
one more state than the last time (picking up New Mexico
and Iowa and losing New Hampshire). This is a validation
of the war and of prisoner abuse? This is a mandate
to do whatever he wants to do and whatever the leadership
of the evangelical denominations want? A
percentage point and a single state are a mandate for
more war? Never before in American political history!
[...]
Nothing, in other words, has changed in the last two
years. The war is still the "right thing to do,"
it is still part of the "war against terrorism,"
it is still essential to keep Arabs from blowing up
our skyscrapers.
You can still get away with the "big lie"
as long as Karl Rove and his team of spinners keep providing
persuasive rationalizations. The
American public is still supine, uneasy about the war,
but not willing yet to turn decisively against it. Will
that still be the case next year when we "celebrate"
the third anniversary of the war? Is
the patience of the American people that long suffering?
Is there no outrage left in the country? |
An American marine who shot dead
an injured unarmed Iraqi in Fallujah, in an incident
captured on video which led the Pentagon to open a war
crimes inquiry, is reported to have escaped prosecution.
According to the CBS news network
yesterday, investigators concluded that there was insufficient
evidence to charge the marine and that given the circumstances
of the battlefield it was possible that he felt his
life was threatened. "At the very least,
navy legal experts believe the situation is ambiguous
enough that no prosecutor could get a conviction,"
the station reported.
The US Marine Corps issued a statement from Iraq saying
that no decision had been taken and that the investigation
was continuing. [...]
The incident took place during the operation in November
last year to take control of the city that was long
considered a stronghold of the resistance. The week-long
operation cost the lives of more than 70 marines, hundreds
of insurgents and an unknown number of civilians. The
city was all but destroyed in the effort.
The shooting of the wounded Iraqi,
who was lying in a mosque with other injured men, was
recorded by an American television crew. Viewers were
able to see the marine pointing his rifle at the man
and hear him say that he was faking he was dead. A clatter
of gunfire could then he heard and another marine says:
"He's dead now."
At the time of the incident the
shooting was described by the International Committee
of the Red Cross as a demonstration of "utter contempt
for humanity". [...] |
Colin Powell, the former US secretary
of state, has for the first time publicly criticised
troops levels in Iraq and spoken of the rifts between
himself and Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary,
that undermined his role as architect of American foreign
policy.
Mr Powell, in his first interview since resigning last
November, also told The Telegraph of his "dismay"
at the deterioration in relations between America and
Europe and of his "disappointment" with France.
While holding back from blaming
Mr Rumsfeld by name for the problems that eventually
persuaded him to resign, Mr Powell showed that much
of the innuendo and leaks surrounding his volatile relationship
with the defence secretary had been well-founded.
Admitting that Mr Rumsfeld's controversial plan to
fight the war with limited troop numbers had been an
outstanding success, Mr Powell said the "nation
building" that followed had been deeply flawed.
[...]
Mr Powell said he had warned President George W Bush
over dinner in August 2002 that the problem with Iraq
was not going to be the invasion but what followed.
He told him: "This place will crack like a goblet
and it will be a problem to pick up the bits. It
was on this basis that he decided to let me see if we
could find a United Nations solution to this."
Mr Powell told Charles Moore, the former editor of
The Telegraph who conducted the interview outside Washington,
that he regretted the fall-out with Europe over the
Iraq war.
He also found Mr Rumsfeld's reference to "New
Europe" and "Old Europe" unfortunate.
"I never used the phrase," he said. "It
just wasn't a useful construct. I don't think the president
ever used it.
"We've got a lot more work to
do with European public opinion." |
The Iraq war has produced many
winners and many losers. And one small but significant
winner is a certain William "Bucky" Bush,
brother of one president and uncle to the current occupant
of the White House.
The good fortune of Uncle Bucky, as he is known within
America's ruling family, has been to hold a seat on
the board of Engineered Support Systems Incorporated
(ESSI), a St Louis-based company that has flourished
mightily as a military contractor to the Pentagon.
Last month, ESSI shares hit
a record $60.39 (£31.64) apiece more or
less exactly the moment the presidential uncle chose
to sell 8,438 options worth around $450,000,
according to obligatory reports filed with the US Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and disclosed by the Los
Angeles Times yesterday. William
Bush denies that his presence on the board has had anything
to do with the company's success in boosting expected
revenues to an estimated $1bn in 2005, in good part
reflecting no-bid contracts relating to the war.
Noting that he joined it in 2000, before his nephew
was elected, "Bucky" Bush says he has not
lobbied anyone in Washington to send contracts ESSI's
way. "I don't make any calls to the 202 [Washington,
DC] area code," he told the LA Times.
In fact Mr Bush, aged 66 and 14 years the junior of
his brother, the first president George Bush, has long
been a prominent member of the St Louis business community
and was state chairman in Missouri for the 2004 Bush/Cheney
re-election campaign. "Having
a Bush doesn't hurt," Dan Kreher, a senior ESSI
executive, says.
The company has supplied a variety of equipment to
the US military effort in Iraq, including a $49m
contract to refurbish military trailers and an
$18m deal to provide communications
services to the Coalition Provisional Authority, which
ran post-Saddam Iraq until June last year. In
2003, ESSI was awarded contracts for equipment to help
search for, and protect US soldiers from, Iraq's chemical
and biological weapons, which turned out to have been
a figment of the imagination of the Bush administration.
But some of that government business is now under scrutiny.
The Pentagon has announced that
$158m worth of contracts
won by ESSI in 2002, including work on a new air cargo
loading device called Tunner, is being reviewed by its
inspector general for suspected "anomalies".
ESSI responds that the inquiry is a routine examination
of work awarded on a sole-source basis. It would have
"no effect" on the company, Gerald Potthoff,
its president, told stock analysts this week. [...]
Some Democrats complain that the Bushes and their associates
have been given a virtual free pass on business affairs
unlike President Bill Clinton,
who was hounded for years over his involvement in Whitewater,
a modest Arkansas real estate venture, in which he and
his wife Hillary actually lost money. |
NEW YORK/SANTIAGO - A U.S. bank
that ran into serious trouble for
helping foreign officials hide money has agreed
to settle a Spanish lawsuit by paying $8 million into
a fund for victims of former client Chilean ex-dictator
Augusto Pinochet, the bank said on Friday.
In Chile, a human rights lawyer called the settlement
in Spain by Washington, D.C.-based Riggs National Corp.
an important part of international efforts to bring
Pinochet to justice for human rights abuses during his
1973-1990 rule. [...]
Garzon filed a legal complaint against Riggs last year
in Madrid, alleging the bank had illegally concealed
assets, and ordered the creation of a fund for victims
of Pinochet. [...]
Hendrix said Riggs would pay the $8 million using funds
set aside for litigation, and that the
Madrid court had dismissed criminal and civil claims
against the company and seven former and current directors.
[...] |
Speaking from the press
lectern at the Miraflores Palace at precisely 02:45 p.m.
today, Communications & Information Minister Andres
Izarra has reconfirmed the position that the Venezuela
government has "incontrovertible proof" that a plot
is being hatched to assassinate President Hugo Chavez
Frias.
Izarra stated in clear, unequivocal terms, that he will
not reveal the source of this intelligence information
... but he did say that persons involved in past destabilization
attempts in Venezuela are acting in concert with the main
assassination coup plotters.
A local journalist pointed out that there had been alarms
in the past about a possible assassination attempt on
the President's life, but that the government, then
as now, had never offered any proof or given names. Izarra
merely answered that the information exists and that for
reasons of national security, he could not reveal the
source and that the fact he would not reveal it did not
mean that such a plot did not exist.
VHeadline.com can, however, reveal that we have been
able to corroborate intelligence details from other reliable
sources which show a build-up of subversive activities
focusing on a possible date within the next one hundred
days. Activities out of the US Embassy bunker on Colinas
de Valle Arriba as well as covert locations outside the
capital show the high-level participation of US government
agencies in support of violent anti-government groupings
intent on the overthrow of President Hugo Chavez Frias'
democratically-elected government.
The same confidential intelligence sources also formed
the basis of our February 3, 2002, World Exclusive in
which we revealed the preliminaries to the April 2002
coup d'etat which saw US puppet dictator Pedro Carmona
Estanga seize power to dissolve the Constitution, Congress
and the Venezuelan judiciary all in one fell swoop.
Now ... as then ... covert US Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) operatives are already in place in Venezuela as
the SOA/WHISC prepares for what we can only describe as
"a third bite at the cherry." [...]
|
U.S.
& Cuba |
by Salim Lamrani February 04,
2005
Translated by Barbara & David Forbes. |
In order to achieve
their avowed objective of destroying the Cuban revolution,
the USA has several different strings to its bow. Apart
from the economic sanctions condemned by the entire international
community (1), various acts of violence and sabotage from
the realms of international terrorism, or the intensive
misinformation campaign minutely detailed in Colin Powell's
report, Washington has also organised an internal opposition
which is easily manipulated and loyal to her every wish.
(2)
The report "Commission for Assistance to a Free
Cuba", presented in May 2004, gives the names of
the leaders of "civil society" around whom a
broad subversive movement can be organised: Raúl
Rivero, Oscar Elias Biscet, Oswaldo Payá and Marta
Beatriz Roque. (3) These "star dissidents",
who never stop sounding forth about the "violation
of human rights in Cuba" under the halo of a legitimacy
which would not support any analysis, have the task of
recruiting as many people as possible in order to achieve
"political and social change" in their country.
This euphemism refers to George Bush's devastating policies.
The fact of participation in an imperialist policy intended
to set Cuba and her people back fifty years does not seem
to pose them any kind of ethical problems.
The financing of opposition groups began
long before May 2004. Since 1996 the Helms-Burton Law
allowed for the organisation and overt financial support
for a fifth column of sycophants. Section 109 of this
same legislation stipulates that substantial economic
aid and logistical support may be given to designated
small groups in order to "encourage efforts to build
democracy in Cuba" (4). This programme of political
destabilisation is run by the US Agency for International
Development (USAID).
29 million dollars have thus been allocated to the organisation
of a "democratic Cuban opposition and a civil society."
This sum is additional to the 7 million dollars provided
by USAID. So, a total budget of 36 million dollars is
earmarked to subversive elements tasked with setting up
the necessary conditions for destabilising the nation.
(5) These "dissidents", who are richly rewarded
for their activities, are an essential cog in Washington's
aggressive strategy, and are supposed to give a more respectable
and credible image to world opinion of the unbearable
state of siege inflicted by the United States. Under the
guise of the "struggle for human rights", some
individuals who are particularly lacking in integrity
are promoting the White House's agenda out of financial
motivation.
The US Interests Sections, directed by James Cason, has
the task of uniting all the "opposition forces",
giving them instructions and overseeing the smooth functioning
of the subversion process. Faced with this mercenary organisation,
the Cuban legal authorities arrested 75 people in March
2003 who were convicted of "conspiracy, association
with a foreign power and attacks on national integrity
and the territorial independence of the state", and
condemned to heavy prison sentences in accord with the
Cuban penal code. (6).
The international outcry which these convictions generated
is entirely unfounded. The Western press and several anti-Cuban
political representatives throughout the world vigorously
condemned the revolutionary government, denouncing the
sanctions taken against "peaceful activists and independent
journalists". According to them, those who were convicted
were being punished for having openly expressed their
disagreement with the official line and for having published
defamatory articles in the extreme right-wing Miami press.
(7)
It is salutary to pause for a moment
to consider these accusations. The two Cuban "dissidents"
with the largest media influence at international level,
who launch the most acerbic diatribes against the Cuban
revolution and who enjoy the most sustained support of
the Cuban-origin extremists in Miami, are Oswaldo Payá
and Elizardo Sánchez. (8) Compared with them, Raul
Rivero seems like a relatively moderate and cautious "opponent".
However, this latter person has been condemned to 20 years
imprisonment. Payá and Sánchez have never
had any problems with the law, although their political
writings are much more virulent than Rivero's. The explanation
is simple enough: Payá and Sánchez have
up until now always refused the generous financial support
offered by Washington, while Rivero made the error of
profiting from the financial largesse of the Bush administration.
And this is what has been punished, not a supposedly heterodox
literary and political output. These
concrete facts clearly show that the argument accusing
the Cuban authorities of imprisoning people for their
ideas has well nigh zero credibility.
Becoming involved in the world of "dissidence"
cannot be explained simply by a clear lack of patriotism.
The economic advantages of this profession are significant
and stoke the greed of un-conscientious individuals. The
75 people who were convicted did not have any paid work
and lived from the financial inducements of the US authorities
in return for the duties they had carried out. The salaries,
which were considerable for the standard of life in Cuba,
led certain people to amass small personal fortunes of
up to 16 000 dollars in cash, while the average salary
is between 15 and 20 dollars per month. (10) They thus
had a far superior lifestyle to most Cubans and benefited
at the same time from the incomparable privileges of the
Cuban social system.
To appreciate the size of this sum of money, we have
to remind ourselves of the value of the dollar in Cuba.
For the equivalent of one dollar, a Cuban can choose to
buy himself: 104 litres of milk, 45 kilos of rice, 26
tickets for baseball matches, between five and 26 tickets
for the theatre or cinema, 5200 kilowatts of electricity
or videos of five televised English courses of 160 hours
each. All other basic foodstuffs (bread, beans, oil) are
in the same price range. Added to that are the free education,
health and leisure services. Given that 85% of Cuban citizens
are owners of their property, they pay no rent. Furthermore,
taxation does not exist in Cuba. And another unique point:
medicines bought at chemists' shops cost 50% less than
fifty years ago. (11) All this is possible thanks to the
annual subsidies given by the Cuban state, so vilified
by the "dissidents" who do not, however, miss
out on the benefits of the advantageous conditions which
Cuban society offers. [...]
Notes :
1] Granma, " 179 países votan en la ONU contra
el bloqueo ", 28 October 2004. www.granma.cu/espanol/2004/octubre/juev28/votan-e.html
(site consulted 29 October 2004).
[2] Colin L. Powell, Commission for Assistance to a Free
Cuba, (Washington : United States Department of State,
May 2004). www.state.gov/documents/organizatio... (site
consulted 7 May 2004), p. 22.
[3] Ibid., p. 16.
[4] Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act (LIBERTAD),
Section 109, P.L. 104-114.
[5] Colin L. Powell, op. cit., p. 25.
[6] Felipe Pérez Roque, Nous ne comptons pas renoncer
à notre souveraineté, Conférence
de presse offerte par le ministre des relations extérieures
de la République de Cuba le 9 avril 2003. (Havena:
Editora Política, 2003).
[7] Reporters sans frontières, " Un an après
l'arrestation de 75 dissidents, Reporters sans frontières
mobilise l'Europe contre la répression à
Cuba ", 18 March 2004. www.rsf.org/article.php3 ?id_article=9547
(site consulted 20 March 2004).
[8] Oswaldo Paya, " Mensaje de Oswaldo Paya Sardiñas
a Vaclav Havel, Presidente de la República checa
en su visita a la ciudad de Miami, Florida ", 23
September 2002. www.pdc-cuba.org/paya_havel.htm (site
consulted 25 September 2004) ; El Nuevo Herald, "
Piden a Europa más firmeza contra el régimen
", 7 October 2004. www.miami.com/mld/elnuevo/news/world/cuba/9853178.htm
(site consulted 8 October 2004).
[9] Raúl Rivero, " El cartel del queso blanco
", Luz Cubana, January/February 2003, n°1 : 9-10.
[10] Felipe Pérez Roque, " Conferencia a la
prensa nacional y extranjera ", MINREX, 25 March
2004 : 5-7.
[11] Gouvernement révolutionnaire de Cuba, "
Documents ", 18 April 2003. www.cuba.cu/gobierno/documentos/2003/fra/n180403f.html
(site consulted 2 December 2004). |
Vice President Dick Cheney likely
will step down next year due to health reasons and be
replaced by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, according
to a report by geopolitical expert Jack Wheeler.
On his website, To the Point, Wheeler reports there's
a "red-breasted rumor bird" flying around
Capitol Hill that has whispered the same thing to most
congressional committee chairmen.
"We all know that Dick Cheney has been the best
vice president of modern times, perhaps in American
history," one such chairman told Wheeler. "And
we know that he absolutely will not run for president
in 2008. Further, he has an unfortunate history of heart
trouble. So let's just say none
of us will be surprised if, sometime next year, he will
step down from the vice presidency due to his health."
Continued the source: "Should this happen, President
Bush would need to appoint his replacement, just as
Richard Nixon chose Gerald Ford to replace Spiro Agnew.
It is quite clear to us whom
the president would choose should he need to: Condoleezza
Rice."
Wheeler goes on to analyze what such a scenario would
mean for the 2008 presidential election.
Writes Wheeler: "Being
a sitting vice president places Condi in an impregnable
position for the GOP nomination in 2008 and sucks every
breath of wind from Hillary's sails. Historically,
it's hard for a party to keep the White House after
they've had it for eight years." [...] |
No person shall be elected to the office of the President
more than twice, and no person who has held the office
of President, or acted as President, for more than two
years of a term to which some other person was elected
President shall be elected to the office of President
more than once.
- AMENDMENT XXII, Passed by Congress March 21, 1947.
Ratified February 27, 1951.
In the wake of George W. Bush's first electoral victory,
detractors have focused on possible illegalities, mostly
involving voting violations that any incompetent needs
in order to succeed. Perhaps all of this hoopla makes
people feel better but they are getting caught up in the
furor of the moment and losing sight of the true significance
of this election. It will be, perhaps, a mystery as to
why Mr. Bush won his first term as an elected president;
but people were maybe happy that a third term could not
be had. And...
This is it folks. Those who figured,
after this election, we would be rid of George W. Bush
might want to think again. They are wrong: a third term
can be had. The XXII Amendment is quite clear on this.
George W. Bush has only been elected
to the Presidency once. His first term he was appointed,
not elected. And, during his first term, he was not sitting
during part of some other President's term of office.
[...]
Again, to think that he will not
move to make it three terms as President is a little naïve:
this man and his cronies are experts at utilizing the
courts, else how could such incompetents manage to gain
such heights? Only the incompetent need rely on
devious means to assure success. And so it is that George
W. Bush is more than likely to already be planning to
utilize the exact language of the XXII Amendment with
his very own non- election in 2000 to create a third term
presidency. He could, too, strike
the Amendment from law. All he needs is a majority in
Congress. He, like Hitler, has this hands down.
[...] |
OTTAWA - Prime Minister
Paul Martin said Canada must be consulted before the U.S.
decides to fire on missiles that enter Canadian airspace,
despite Ottawa's refusal to participate in America's missile
defence program.
"I don't think that anyone expected that there would
be any other finger on a button than the Americans,"
Martin said Friday, a day after his decision not to join
the program.
"But in terms of Canadian
airspace, yes we would expect to be consulted. This is
our airspace. We're a sovereign nation. And you don't
intrude on a sovereign nation's airspace without seeking
permission," Martin said.
Martin also rejected claims by U.S. ambassador to Canada
Paul Cellucci that Canada has given up its sovereignty
by saying no to the missile plan.
Cellucci had said the U.S. was surprised
by Martin's decision, saying "we simply cannot understand
why Canada would, in effect, give up its sovereignty,
its seat at the table, to decide what to do about missiles
that might be headed towards Canada."
"We did not give up sovereignty,"
Martin responded. "We affirmed sovereignty."
[...]
When he first took office, Martin suggested he supported
joining the plan, saying he believed Canada should be
at the table when it comes to any discussion of the defence
of North America.
"I think our sovereignty depends on us being at
the table when discussions are taking place about the
defence of North America," Martin said in 2003, before
becoming the Liberal leader. |
The United States has
blocked attempts to up the status of the UN's environmental
arm and to launch formal talks on an EU-backed treaty to
ban mercury, which is linked to serious ailments in pregnant
women and children, diplomats said Friday.
At a week-long forum in the Kenyan capital Nairobi, Washington
cratered a French-German proposal that would have turned
the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) into a full-fledged
United Nations agency with stronger powers and a bigger
budget, they said.
US opposition to the proposed mercury pact sparked "heated
debate" at a meeting of UNEP's governing board, which
ended up calling for voluntary public-private partnerships
to reduce mercury levels, the diplomats said. [...]
A 2003 UNEP study found that coal-fired
power plants and artisanal mining of silver and gold were
a major source of mercury found in the earth's air, soil
and waterways and recommended action to reduce its presence.
In response, several governments, including members of
the European Union, called for a legally binding pact
to ban mercury, which can cause brain damage in unborn
children and infants and possibly impair their nervous
systems.
"We are disappointed that other countries did not
allow the proposal to move forward," said Elena Lymberidi
of the EU's Environmental Bureau.
But the United States, which relies
heavily on coal-generated electricity, objected, arguing
that more study was needed before moving ahead with discussions
on a treaty and proposing the partnerhip schemes as an
alternative.
"We came here with a position that we wanted to
take immediate action through these partnerships and that
we wanted to defer a decision on a legally binding instrument
until we have results on this partnerships," said
Claudia McMurray, the senior diplomat who led the US delegation
to the UNEP meeting. [...]
|
The United States expressed
concern Friday that an upcoming inaugural leaders' meeting
of East Asian countries could become an "exclusive"
and "inward looking" grouping.
Malaysia will host the summit among 10 Southeast Asian
nations and China, Japan and South Korea at the end of
this year.
Singapore Foreign Minister George Yeo said after talks
with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and other
American officials that Washington "has some concerns
that the East Asian Summit will be inward looking and
exclusive.
"But I told them that countries like Singapore and
other countries in the region will also be against that,"
he told reporters.
The East Asian summit was an initiative of the 10-member
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), which
since 1997 has been holding summit talks with China, Japan
and South Korea at the sidelines of its own summit under
a loose "ASEAN plus three" framework.
At their last meeting in November, ASEAN leaders decided
to formalize the structure into an East Asian summit.
But members were divided over the possibility of expanding
the 13-member setting.
The United States has been opposed since 1990
to an East Asian-only grouping, saying such a format would
rip apart the Pacific. Analysts said United States was
more concerned about China's key role in it and the possibility
of Washington's influence in the region waning as a result.
[...]
|
LUCKNOW, India - An Indian teenager
from one of the country's most backward states appears
to have fooled governments, the media and even India's
president into believing he had topped the world in
a NASA science exam.
In a country hungry for international
recognition, 17-year-old Saurabh Singh was feted
as a national hero after announcing he had won NASA's
International Scientist Discovery examination, which
he said he took at Oxford University.
The Uttar Pradesh state government
rewarded him with a 500,000 rupee prize (6,110 pounds)
and more than 100 members of the state's upper house
each donated a day's salary to him.
But as he was at the president's official residence
awaiting an audience during the week, his story unravelled.
An Indian news portal, rediff.com,
contacted NASA, which denied any knowledge of the exam.
[...]
Singh had also said President Abdul Kalam and Indian
astronaut Kalpana Chawla, who died in the Columbia shuttle
explosion in 2003, had sat the test. Kalam's office
denies this.
Singh insists he met Kalam, although
some Indian newspapers say the meeting was cancelled
as he waited to go in.
"It was really inspiring,"
Singh told Reuters by phone. "And let me tell you,
he saw my certificate and praised me for the achievement,
while you all are asking all kinds of questions and
trying to dub me as a fraud."
The certificate, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters,
declared "You are the member
of NASA" (sic) and is signed by Singh and "Chief
of NASA, Cin K. Kif" -- NASA's former administrator
was Sean O'Keefe. It also lists the name of Singh's
father, common practice in Indian documents.
Singh says he flew to London on Indian Airlines --
which does not fly to the city
-- and took a taxi to Oxford University and back every
day for the exam from January 4-8, a round trip of about
140 miles.
Singh told Reuters he stayed in a
hotel, but told a Hindi language newspaper he stayed
at Buckingham Palace.
The Indian school where he says he sat the preliminary
exam along with 200,000 others does not exist. The Bansal
institute, where he says he studied mathematics, has
never heard of him.
Singh cannot produce his passport
to back his claim. That, he says, is with institute
director P.K. Bansal.
"How can we possess his passport when we don't
even know him?" Saturday's The Indian Express quoted
Bansal saying. |
A volcano on Atka Island erupted
briefly, sending ash and steam to about 8,000 feet and
making some residents nervous.
The Alaska Volcano Observatory reports that two other
restless volcanoes — Mount Spurr west of Anchorage
and Mount Veniaminof on the Alaska Peninsula —
remained relatively quiet Thursday.
Several Atka village residents reported seeing a burst
Wednesday evening from the 5,029-foot Korovin volcano
that drifted east, followed by more steaming on Thursday.
No ash fell on the village, home to about 90 people.
"It could mean that the volcano is coming back
to a higher level of activity," said Chris Waythomas,
a scientist with the observatory. "So we're going
to be watching the thing closely and try to take a look
when we get satellite images." [...] |
TEHRAN - A powerful earthquake
which struck southeast Iran this week killed 612 people,
an official said on Saturday, lifting the toll from
602.
Tuesday's tremor, centred on the town of Zarand about
700 km southeast of Tehran, revived painful memories
of the devastating quake just 14 months ago in the nearby
desert citadel city of Bam that killed 31,000 people.
"The latest figures we now have are 612 people
killed and 1,411 injured," Mohammad Javad Fadaee,
deputy governor of Kerman province, told Reuters by
telephone.
The 6.4 magnitude earthquake levelled several remote
mountain villages where fragile one-storey homes crumbled
and collapsed into piles of mud and broken tiles, leaving
thousands homeless.
Reformist President Mohammad Khatami was visiting the
earthquake-struck area on Saturday. |
It has hardly been
noticed, but it is another sinister warning sign of a
world going badly wrong. Populations of some of Britain's
most attractive woodland birds are plummeting at a rate
that threatens them with extinction, and
nobody knows why.
Precipitous declines in the numbers of some species,
of up to four-fifths, have been registered over the past
30 years, but scientists are just realising what is happening,
and they have no simple explanation.
In its scale and its range, the phenomenon is one of
the most ominous events in the natural history of Britain
over the past half-century. Perversely, the decline comes
at a time when Britain is planting more woodlands than
ever, and forest management has never been more sympathetic
to wildlife conservation.
About a dozen species of small birds that have flitted
through our woodlands for thousands of years are suddenly
in serious trouble. This may be associated with climate
change, linked to the damage that excess deer numbers
are doing to the undergrowth in woodlands, or in some
cases, linked to trouble for birds on migration routes
to and from Africa. [...] |
Three new moons discovered around Saturn by the
Cassini spacecraft have been given provisional names.
The discoveries were made last year, not long after
Cassini had arrived in orbit around the ringed planet.
Two moons detected in August have been given the names
Methone and Pallene, while another found in October
has been provisionally named Polydeuces.
Three more candidate objects are still
awaiting confirmation as moons.
Methone and Pallene circle Saturn between the orbits
of two other Saturnian moons, Mimas and Enceladus. They
were discovered by Sebastien Charnoz at the University
of Paris, France.
Polydeuces was detected by Professor Carl Murray at
Queen Mary, University of London, UK.
This latter object is an example of a so-called Trojan
moon - it is twinned with a larger satellite in orbit
around the planet.
Wandering moon
Saturn is the only planet known to have Trojan moons.
They are found near stable "Lagrange points"
- places where the gravitational pull of the planet
and the larger satellite become balanced. [...]
Two objects seen in June called S/2004
S3 and S/2004 S4 are still awaiting confirmation as
moons. Another candidate moon - S/2004 S6 - was seen
in October.
Professor Murray explained that although S/2004 S4
has not been seen since, S3 was seen again in October.
"If it has survived for that long,
chances are that it is a moon. But then again, there
are pictures where we would have expected to see it
and didn't," he said.
He added that the Cassini Imaging Science Team was
hoping to see the object again to confirm that it was
a moon. [...] |
John Ashcroft's name has become
synomous with the "A-word," in the minds of
some Hollywood artists.
The Washington Post reports the former attorney general's
surname was dubbed over the seven-letter obscenity that
begins with the same first two letters in a version
of the Oscar-nominated movie "Sideways."
Correspondent Monte Reel told colleagues he heard the
substitution twice during an in-flight showing of the
hit comedy aboard an Aerolineas Argentinas flight to
Lima, Peru.
Reel reports the dubbing over the "A-word"
was done "in the actual voices of the actors,"
which would mean Thomas Haden Church participated in
the dialogue, "You're an Ashcroft! No, you're an
Ashcroft!"
According to the paper, Fox Searchlight Pictures, the
studio behind "Sideways," failed to respond
to queries seeking an explanation for the name swap.
[...] |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|