|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Did
Neanderthals Lie?
WASHINGTON -- More than 227 years
into their democracy, Americans have come to distrust
their political leaders and suspect them of lying a
lot.
Some politicians say the public is dead right.
There are many explanations for all the lying, ranging
from naked self-interest to a philosophical line of
reasoning that some degree of deception is essential
to effective leadership, according to scholars of political
science and some of its practitioners.
"At an individual weakness level, politicians
too frequently fall victim to a desire to please, and
therefore they outline contrary positions to differing
sides, and it is out of this dynamic that most truth-saying
problems arise," said Rep. James A. Leach, R-Iowa,
who has served in Congress for 27 years.
"Lying and its first cousin, 'spinning,' are easily
rationalized when power is at stake and personal careers
are in jeopardy."
Democrats and Republicans alike tend
to oversimplify complicated realities, and that, too,
is a form of deceit, said Rep. Robert Matsui, D-Calif.,
chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
"It's easier to talk in absolutes
than with ambiguity," Matsui said. "I think
it goes on now more than it has in the past. Politicians
now do it without any embarrassment. They believe it's
justified. People want you to be firm."
Distortion is rewarded.
"If you are very provocative,
you are more likely to be called to go on these TV shows
and you get more attention," Matsui said.
Most political lying is about policy issues.
"Politicians regularly
describe their positions as matters of principle when
they are actually concessions to special interest pressures,"
said Tim Penny, a former Democratic representative from
Minnesota with a wide reputation as a straight-shooter.
Politicians also lie "because
we want them to," Penny said. "We say we don't
want politicians to mislead us, but we really don't
want to hear the truth. If they speak the truth, they
will be punished more often than not."
Sometimes politicians lie unconsciously, said former
House Majority Leader Richard Armey, R-Texas, who admits
that enthusiasm, momentum and partisan zeal occasionally
led him over the borderline of truth.
"I've studied this business of lying for years,"
Armey told a group of reporters at a breakfast shortly
before he retired from Congress last year. "The
best liars are the guys who convince themselves before
they try to convince somebody else."
There is even scientific evidence
correlating deceptive behavior with leadership qualities.
A 1993 study by Colgate University psychologists found
that the best liars among preschool children emerge
as leaders during play periods.
Caroline F. Keating, who helped design and conduct
the research, also studied adults and came to the conclusion
that "leaders are the best misleaders."
Keating found that "very young children successfully
masked their deception by smiling. Successful adult
deceivers made eye contact with the listener."
"To be an effective leader does take acting skills,"
she said in an interview. "You have to look confident
even when you feel unsure. You must look like you feel
well even when you may be sick. You must express emotions
that are powerful, like anger and defiance, even when
you are anxious."
Citizens' expectations of their leaders thus add to
the problem.
"We want them to look smart and strong, so a successful
leader becomes very good at feigning those things even
when he or she does not feel them," Keating said.
"It makes them powerful and effective communicators."
So politicians lie by overpromising, to gain or keep
power, to protect personal secrets and, often, to serve
what they consider higher purposes, like national security
or the common good.
Political leaders also represent a
society where casual lying may be found among many groups:
accountants, lawyers, creators of advertising campaigns,
college professors, used car salesmen and journalists,
too.
Politicians have a special excuse. A succession of
thinkers, from Plato to Machiavelli to Disraeli, have
told them that lying is a legitimate part of governing.
Sissela Bok, a Harvard philosopher who has studied
and written extensively on the subject, said politicians
often claim an ethical basis for deliberately misleading
the public:
"They argue that vital objectives in the national
interest require a measure of deception to succeed in
the face of powerful obstacles. Negotiations must be
carried on that are best hidden from public view; bargains
must be struck that simply cannot
be comprehended by a politically unsophisticated electorate.
A certain amount of illusion is necessary for public
servants to be effective."
Dissembling is contagious, easily spread by example
-- especially when it is done by the men at the very
top of the political order. Richard Nixon's "I
am not a crook," Bill Clinton's "I did not
have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky," and
George H.W. Bush's "Read my lips -- no new taxes"
were notorious examples, although history offers many
more.
The false front has always been a feature of politics.
President Franklin Roosevelt did all he could to hide
his physical infirmities from public awareness, keeping
his wheelchair out of sight. John F. Kennedy's outward
vigor masked constant back pain and the fact that he
was suffering degenerative Addison's disease and taking
multiple drugs.
The public may be deceived, but not for long. Voters
sense what is really going on.
In July 2000, pollster John Zogby asked people which
professions they trusted the most. Dentists and doctors
topped the list. Politicians were at the bottom, lower
than car dealers, auto mechanics and lawyers. A national
poll last November by the Pew Research Center for the
People and the Press found that 55 percent of those
asked did not believe that "most elected officials
are trustworthy."
Lies from politicians can have serious consequences.
Self-government presumes the consent of those governed.
Lies "manufacture consent" by misleading people,
authors Lionel Cliffe, Maureen Ramsey and Dave Bartlett
wrote in their book, "The Politics of Lying: Implications
for Democracy."
Those who run for public office agree, but compulsory
truth-telling makes them uncomfortable.
In New Jersey, the State Senate once buried a bill
that would have imposed fines up to $10,000 on candidates
who make false accusations during a campaign. It simply
wasn't realistic. Negative campaign ads designed to
destroy an opponent are a favorite political forum for
lies.
There was a flap in the U.S. Senate last year over
some sensitive leaked information about terrorism from
the Select Committee on Intelligence. The FBI was called
in to find the leak. Investigators suggested polygraph
tests for those with access to the information, including
members of Congress.
Fat chance.
In a burst of candor, Sen. Richard
Shelby, R-Ala., then vice chairman of the committee,
declared: "I don't know who among us would take
a lie detector test." |
It has long been denied
that the US government bases any policy around the idea
that global oil production may be in terminal decline.
But a new US government-sponsored report, obtained by
Aljazeera.net, does exactly that.
Authored by Robert L. Hirsch, Roger Bezdek and Robert
Wendling and entitled the Peaking of World Oil production:
Impacts, Mitigation, & Risk Management, the report
is an assessment requested by the US Department of Energy
(DoE), National Energy Technology Laboratory.
It was prepared by Hirsch, who is a senior energy programme
adviser at the private scientific and military company,
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).
They work extensively on defence and geopolitical issues
for clients, including many for the US government.
Advisory roles
Among current job openings at SAIC are positions at Fort
Benning (formerly School of the Americas) and a private
military contract to help retrain the Albanian air force
in Tirana.
Hirsch has held a wide variety of positions in the US
energy hierarchy including senior
energy analyst at the Rand Corporation, through
to a presidentially appointed assistant administrator
for solar, geothermal and advanced energy systems.
He has also previously worked for the US Department
of Energy on numerous advisory committees, including the
DoE Energy Research Advisory Board.
This new report follows on from two presentations by
Hirsch last year. One on 1 March to the same National
Energy Technology Laboratory and another on 14 June last
year at the Annapolis Centre for Science Based Public
Policy. Here Hirsch laid down his ideas on the peak of
oil production.
The Annapolis Centre for Science-based
Public Policy is a group which has received $658,000 in
funding from Exxon Mobil since 1998. It openly disputes
the idea that global warming is the result of burning
fossil fuels.
But this brand new senior-level report on "peak
oil" is unprecedented in US government circles. It
is not just the existence of the report itself that is
such a landmark in the current oil debate. Its conclusions
also pull no punches.
Uncertain timing
"World oil peaking is going to happen,"
the report says. Only the "timing is uncertain".
The effects of any oil peak are similarly
not ignored. Specifically, the impact on the economy of
the United States. "The development of the US economy
and lifestyle has been fundamentally shaped by the availability
of abundant, low-cost oil. Oil scarcity and several-fold
oil price increases due to world oil production peaking
could have dramatic impacts ... the economic loss to the
United States could be measured on a trillion-dollar scale,"
the report says.
The authors of the report also dismiss
the power of the markets to solve any oil peak. They call
for the intervention of governments. But also they rather
worryingly point to a need to exclude public debate and
environmental concerns from the process. They say this
is needed to speed up decision-making.
"Intervention by governments will be required, because
the economic and social implications of oil peaking would
otherwise be chaotic. But the process will not be easy.
Expediency may require major changes
to ... lengthy environmental reviews and lengthy public
involvement."
Hirsch notes, despite arguments from the major oil companies
and producer nations, that new finds of oil are not replacing
oil consumed each year. Despite the advances in technology
reserves are becoming increasingly difficult to replace.
Three scenarios
The report sees "a world moving from a long period
in which reserves additions were much greater than consumption,
to an era in which annual additions are falling increasingly
short of annual consumption. This is but one of a number
of trends that suggest the world is fast approaching the
inevitable peaking of conventional world oil production".
The report then takes three possible scenarios and outcomes.
Firstly that energy replacement solutions, or "mitigation"
as the report states, are started 20 years before any
"peak". Secondly that solutions are only enacted
10 years before any peak and, thirdly, that solutions
are only put into practice as the peak becomes apparent.
In what some may see as an optimistic assessment, the
authors believe 20 years is enough time to limit damage
from any peak. However, they point out that
"if mitigation were to be too little, too late, world
supply/demand balance will be achieved through massive
demand destruction".
Demand destruction is a modern
way of saying catastrophic recessions and shortages.
But as well as these predictions, the report lays out
"signals" it believes will be apparent in the
run-up to any peak. This is perhaps the most worrying
aspect of the report, as it seems to describe the very
events that are taking place at the moment.
Supply insecurity
"As world oil peaking is approached, excess production
capacity ... will disappear, so that even minor supply
disruptions will cause increased price volatility as traders,
speculators, and other market participants react to supply/demand
events," the report says.
"Simultaneously, oil storage inventories are likely
to decrease, further eroding security of supply, aggravating
price volatility, and further stimulating speculation
... oil could become the price setter in the broader energy
market, in which case other energy prices could well become
increasingly volatile and unpredictable."
The report highlights a series of ways to minimise any
impacts. From increased fuel efficiency to technological
help in stopping the practice of "oil-left-behind"
or non-extractable oil and various forms of new liquid
fuels, liquefied coal and gas-to-liquids.
But in its conclusion the report makes
troubling reading, noting that "the world has never
faced a problem like this. Without massive mitigation
more than a decade before the fact, the problem will be
pervasive and will not be temporary. Previous energy transitions
were gradual and evolutionary. Oil peaking will be abrupt
and revolutionary".
This report is the clearest signal yet that the U.S government
is taking the subject of "peak oil" seriously.
Yet it remains to be seen what actions can be taken to
stop this potentially "revolutionary" change. |
China's craving for
oil to drive its industrial boom and, to a lesser extent,
satisfy its love affair with the motorcar, has helped
to push up global crude oil prices.
In 2003, China raced past Japan to become the world's
second biggest consumer of petroleum products after the
US.
In 2004, its thirst grew by 15%, while its output only
rose 2%.
China's oil demand 1980-2004
"They have a problem," says Philip Andrews-Speed,
an energy analyst at Dundee University and former BP China
executive.
China accounted for 40% of the growth in oil demand over
the last four years, says the US Energy Information Administration
(EIA).
To slake its seemingly insatiable
thirst, Chinese oil firms are trying to squeeze
more out of their wells using smarter technology and they
are rumoured to be considering buying parts of Western
oil majors.
China has also embarked on a frenzy
of oil hunting diplomacy. China's rulers seldom
go anywhere these days without talking oil, while at home
in the last year they have unrolled the red carpet in
Beijing to dignitaries from all 11 countries in the Opec
cartel.
They got results.
China clinched deals to develop fields in Iran.
The red flag came out too, as China opted for a bit of
anti-imperialist bonding. Cuba agreed to let China explore
its coastal oil fields.
And eyebrows were raised in Washington when left-wing
Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez offered Chinese firms
operating rights to mature oil fields.
As the world's fifth biggest oil exporter, Venezuela
is vitally important to the US, though
relations between the White House and President Chavez
are strained.
Venezuela's output has been poor since a political tussle
led to the sacking of senior managers at national oil
group Petroleos de Venezuela.
President Chavez may hope Chinese engineers can help
"revive Venezuela's oil fields on the cheap",
says Leo Drollas, Deputy Director of the UK-based Centre
for Global Energy Studies.
'Aggressive quest'
None of this has gone unnoticed by Western oil majors,
and it risks getting up some powerful US noses.
CHINA'S THIRST FOR OIL
Chinese worker in oil refinery
2005 - 7.2 million barrels a day
2004 - 6.6 million barrels a day
2005 demand seen up 9%
2004 demand up 15%
43% of oil used by industry
34% used by cars
Sources: US EIA, IEA |
James Lilley, ex-US ambassador to Beijing, has said "the
Chinese are on an aggressive quest to increase their supply
of oil all around the world", according to remarks
quoted on industry website Alexander's Gas and Oil Connections.
ChevronTexaco chief Dave O'Reilly has warned of a "bidding
war for Middle Eastern oil between east and west".
In December Asian industrialised powers swallowed their
rivalries to invite Opec oil ministers to India in an
attempt - albeit unsuccessful so far - to renegotiate
long-term supply contracts to run for up to five years,
says Mr Drollas.
China has also been "building strategic relationships"
with states "along the sea lanes from the Middle
East", according to Alexander's, quoting a briefing
paper written for US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Pumping up technology
China is not fussy where its oil comes
from, whether Kazakhstan, Sudan or Angola. Its main concern
is having enough of it, and the quest is driven from the
very top.
China has plenty of oil of its own, but the onshore fields
in particular are old and running dry. Offshore, the situation
is rosier.
Technologically, China's big four oil groups lag behind
Western majors, particularly at deep sea drilling - unfortunate,
given the future importance of offshore finds.
But government backing could help.
"They're less liable to put projects through the
same rigorous commercial evaluation that multinationals
would do," says Mr Andrews-Speed.
They are also "making great strides" with advanced
seismic imaging techniques that can pinpoint oil reservoirs
to save time and money, says Jeffrey Logan, China researcher
at the International Energy Agency (IEA).
Acquisition trail?
Internationally, a strategy has been mooted whereby Chinese
oil firms would be buying chunks of Western ones .
China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) has asked
its bankers to price up a takeover of mid-sized US oil
company Unocal, which drills in Indonesia and Thailand.
This raises two questions: Could China's main offshore
explorer afford to buy Unocal, ranked ninth among US oil
producers? And do Chinese firms have the management skills
to run such an acquisition?
The answer to both is 'Maybe'.
Running a Chinese oil company is a highly political business,
and successful oil mandarins tend to have their eye on
plum government jobs.
"Their attention is divided, let's say," is
how one analyst puts it.
But CNOOC bosses have impressed. They talk fluent industry
jargon, wooed Henry Kissinger onto their advisory board,
and have a $4.3bn petrochemical project with Shell that
is China's biggest joint venture investment.
If CNOOC does bid, it is expected to keep Unocal's Asian
assets and sell everything else right away. CNOOC is cash
rich, but faces a lot of calls on its money to meet development
plans.
Although high oil prices have boosted profits, any shopping
trip is likely to prove expensive in such a tight market.
Bargains are non-existent, and China's thirst is perhaps
the main reason. |
The number of cases of
the deadliest form of malaria across the world could be
twice as high as previously predicted, researchers suggest.
A team from the University of Oxford, writing in Nature,
estimated there were over half a billion cases of Plasmodium
falciparum malaria globally in 2002.
The figure is up to 50% higher than estimates from the
World Health Organization.
Two thirds of cases occurred in Africa, predominantly
affecting under-fives.
The new figures are 200% higher for areas outside Africa.
The study suggests that, in total, 2.2
billion people are at risk from malaria.
The researchers say this could be because the WHO's reliance
on all centres in a particular country reporting all cases
of the disease in order to collate incidence data was
less certain than the method they used.
The WHO had set a target to halve deaths by 2010, but
resistance to drugs is threatening that plan. [...]
Professor Bob Snow, who led the research, said: "We
have taken a conservative approach to estimating how many
attacks occur globally each year but even so the problem
is far bigger than we previously thought.
"We have taken a science-driven approach to working
out who is at risk, where they are located and what their
chances would be of developing an attack of malaria.
"Our work has demonstrated that nearly 25% of worldwide
cases occur in South East Asia and the Western Pacific
- whereas most people regard Plasmodium falciparum disease
a problem particular to Africa." [...] |
OTTAWA, March 8 (Xinhuanet)
-- Canada's military intelligence arm has warned the government
that avian influenza could be used as a weapon of bioterrorism,
it is reported here Tuesday.
A report, entitled Recent Human Outbreaks of Avian Influenza
and Potential Biological Warfare Implications, reveals
that military planners believe a naturally occurring flu
pandemic may be imminent.
The report, dated Dec. 8, 2004, outlines in broad terms
the methods that could be used to develop a manmade strain
of influenza capable of triggering a human flu pandemic.
It notes a method called "passaging," while
not entirely predictable, could be a "potentially
highly effective" way to push a virus to develop
virulence.
"Such forced antigenic shifts could be attempted
in a biological weapons program," says the 15-page
report. |
A former U.S. Marine who participated
in capturing ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein said
the public version of his capture was fabricated.
Ex-Sgt. Nadim Abou Rabeh, of Lebanese descent, was
quoted in the Saudi daily al-Medina Wednesday as saying
Saddam was actually captured Friday, Dec. 12, 2003,
and not the day after, as announced by the U.S. Army.
"I was among the 20-man unit,
including eight of Arab descent, who searched for Saddam
for three days in the area of Dour near Tikrit, and
we found him in a modest home in a small village and
not in a hole as announced," Abou Rabeh said.
"We captured him after fierce resistance during
which a Marine of Sudanese origin was killed,"
he said.
He said Saddam himself fired
at them with a gun from the window of a room on the
second floor. Then they shouted at him in Arabic:
"You have to surrender. ... There is no point in
resisting."
"Later on, a military production
team fabricated the film of Saddam's capture in a hole,
which was in fact a deserted well," Abou Rabeh
said. |
Last
week, American authorities arranged a meeting of the
former Iraqi dictator with his wife.
She was the first of Hussein's relatives to meet with
the ex-leader of Iraq at a new place, at the American
military base in Qatar. Accompanied by Sheikh Hamad
Al-Tani, Sajida Heiralla Tuffah has arrived from Syria
on his private jet in the end of March.
The outcome of their meeting turned out to be quite
scandalous. Sajina claims that the person she encountered
was not her husband, but his double.
If someone were to say for sure that it was not insinuation,
it would have been easy to believe the wife with a 25-year
experience. It is also possible to assume that Saddam
has simply changed since the day of his sons' deaths,
June 24 2003. This however is highly unlikely. In case
we believe Hussein's wife, all DNA testing of the ex-Iraqi
leader should be considered a mere fake. Overall, today
there remain more questions then there are answers.
|
WASHINGTON - The United States
has withdrawn from an international agreement that gives
jailed foreigners the right to talk to consular officers,
a protocol that critics of capital
punishment used to win reviews of death sentences given
to 51 Mexicans jailed here.
State Department spokesman Richard Boucher confirmed
a report in the Washington Post on Thursday that the
United States had decided to pull out of the Optional
Protocol to the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.
"All these people have the right to raise their
issues in court," Boucher told reporters traveling
with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on a trip to
Mexico, which opposes U.S. death penalty policies.
Boucher said that given some of the
interpretations made by the World Court "we didn't
want any more of them."
Rice had notified U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan,
in a letter dated March 7, that the United States "hereby
withdraws" from the protocol, the Post reported.
In recent years, other countries with
support from U.S. death penalty opponents have successfully
complained before the World Court that their citizens
were sentenced to death by U.S. states without access
to diplomats from their own nations.
The optional protocol gives
the World Court, which is also known as the International
Court of Justice, the final word when detainees say
they have been denied the right to see a diplomat from
their country. [...] |
The nomination of John
Bolton to be US ambassador to the United Nations is a resounding
declaration of American contempt for the organization and
the rest of the world. When Condoleezza Rice forced Bolton
out of his niche at the State Department, it was taken worldwide
as a positive indication of the prospects of multilateralism
in Bush's second term, in some measure compensating for
the retirement of Colin Powell--not least since no one was
sure how much of a multilateralist Rice is.
Some playful souls scared colleagues
by suggesting that Bolton could end up as UN ambassador,
but the consensus was that not even Bush could be that
crassly insouciant about the views of the rest of the
world.
This week showed that once again, the
world has underestimated the President.
Bolton's nomination sends a message
to the Europeans that on his recent European tour Bush
was only kidding about a joint approach to global threats.
It sends a message to the rest of the world that the United
States will not listen to them, but will pursue its own
obsessively theological agenda in the teeth of almost
universal opposition.
Some UN officials are halfheartedly trying to convince
themselves that the job will make Bolton more amenable
to working within the system. Sadly, they are almost certain
to be disappointed. He has shown no compunction about
working the system for his own and his conservative colleagues'
benefit. As far back as 1992, when he was Assistant Secretary
of State for International Organization Affairs, he was
trying to shake down the UN Development Program for a
$2 million grant to an organization that was little more
than a pension fund for a conservative colleague [see
Williams, "Why the Right Loves the U.N.," April
13, 1992].
More recently, Bolton was an assistant to James Baker
when the former Secretary of State was Secretary General
Kofi Annan's (failed) representative for Western Sahara.
But Bolton has remained unrelenting in his opposition,
both rhetorical and practical, to the UN even as he took
the money.
If there is a bright side to his appointment, it is that
it will make it much more difficult for the United States
to advance its agenda at the UN than if the President
had appointed a real diplomat rather than someone who
epitomizes American diplomacy as an oxymoron. There are
lots of governments prepared to grovel to Washington,
but Bolton will make it difficult to grovel gracefully.
Much of Western diplomacy at the UN, for example, consists
of sweet-talking the Chinese delegation out of using their
veto. Bolton, who took $30,000 from the Taiwanese to advise
them on how to join the UN he despises, does not do sweet
talk.
Traditionally, while Democratic envoys to the UN have
also held Cabinet office, Republican appointees do not,
which has made them subordinate to the State Department.
However, Bolton was taking instructions from Dick Cheney
and Donald Rumsfeld even when he was in the State Department.
He is unlikely to pay too much attention to the Secretary
of State now, so even if Rice is sincere in the appearance
that she seems to be trying to present to allies, Bolton
will certainly sabotage her efforts at the UN.
The man who ordered a CIA probe on Hans
Blix for not finding weapons in Iraq when ordered, who
contrived the dismissal of the head of the Organization
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and who in 1999
wrote for the American Enterprise Institute of "Kofi
Annan's UN Power Grab," has recently been trying
fire Mohamed ElBaradei, chief of the International Atomic
Energy Agency, for not finding nuclear weapons in Iran.
Americans, and the rest of the world, should worry. If
his appointment is confirmed, Bolton's task is likely
to be to bully the UN into supporting an Iraq-style fiasco
in Iran or Syria.
However, that is slightly longer-term. Possibly among
the immediate casualties of Bolton's appointment will
be some thousands of dead Darfurians. A resolution that
would refer the continuing mayhem in Sudan to the International
Criminal Court has already been stalled for months by
the die-hard resistance of the Bolton faction in the State
Department, but twelve members of the Security Council
were cautiously optimistic that they had averted an American
veto. Although it is clear that this is the one sanction
actually feared by the Sudanese government and the Janjaweed
militias it has employed, Bolton has already shown that
in his obsessive war with the International Criminal Court,
he does not care about the views of allies. Indeed, his
fervent opposition to international restrictions on small-arms
trade, landmines, biological weapons, child soldiers and
nuclear testing suggests that he is quite prepared to
accept significant casualties for his views--as long as
they are other people's.
The Darfurians should be praying for long and protracted
confirmation hearings for America's most undiplomatic
ambassador. They should also be praying that Rice will
seize the time to effect a compromise. It should not be
difficult for sane senators to question the fitness of
a putative UN ambassador who in 1994 asserted that "there
is no such thing as the United Nations" and later
that "if the UN Secretariat building in New York
lost ten stories, it wouldn't make a bit of difference."
|
The
enemy within
How an Americanist devoted to destroying international alliances
became the US envoy to the UN |
Sidney Blumenthal
The Guardian
Thursday March 10, 2005 |
In the heat of the battle
over the Florida vote after the 2000 US presidential election,
a burly, mustachioed man burst into the room where the
ballots for Miami-Dade County were being tabulated, like
John Wayne barging into a saloon for a shoot-out. "I'm
with the Bush-Cheney team, and I'm here to stop the count,"
drawled John Bolton. And those ballots from Miami-Dade
were not counted.
Now that same John Bolton has been named by President
Bush as the US ambassador to the UN. "If
I were redoing the security council today, I'd have one
permanent member because that's the real reflection of
the distribution of power in the world," Bolton once
said. Lately, as undersecretary of state for arms
control, he has wrecked all the nonproliferation diplomacy
within his reach. Over the past two decades he has been
the person most dedicated to trying to discredit the UN.
George Orwell's clock of 1984 is striking 13.
The euphoria that Bush's European trip
marked a conversion on the road to Brussels is fading.
For it was Bush himself who decided to reward Bolton with
a position where he could continue his crusade as a "convinced
Americanist" against the "globalists,"
especially those at the UN and the EU.
Bolton made a play to become deputy secretary of state
after the 2004 election, but was blocked by Condoleezza
Rice, who understood that his love of bureaucratic infighting
would have undermined her authority. Dick Cheney privately
promised Bolton that if all else failed he would give
him a job on his vice presidential staff, but that proved
unnecessary when Bush nominated him to the UN post. Rice
announced his appointment, symbolically demonstrating
that he reports to her. But Bolton has deep support within
the White House, and Rice is very much a work-in-progress.
With Bolton's appointment, the empire strikes back.
Bolton is an extraordinary combination
of political operator and ideologue. He began his career
as a cog in the machine of Senator Jesse Helms of North
Carolina, helping his political action committees evade
legal restrictions and federal fines. Helms, the most
powerful reactionary in the Senate, sponsored Bolton's
rise to Reagan's justice department.
"John Bolton," Helms said, "is the kind
of man with whom I would want to stand at Armageddon,
or what the Bible describes as the final battle between
good and evil."
Bolton is often called a neoconservative, but he is more
their ally, implementer and agent. His roots are in Helms's
Dixiecrat Republicanism, not the neocons' airy Trotskyism
or Straussianism.
Bolton is a specimen of the "primitives", as
Truman's secretary of state Dean Acheson called the unilateralists
and McCarthyites of the early cold war. Through his political
integration into the neocon apparatus, Bolton might be
properly classified a neoprimitive.
At the state department, Bolton was
Colin Powell's enemy within. In his first year, he forced
the US withdrawal from the anti-ballistic missile treaty,
destroyed a protocol on enforcing the biological weapons
convention, and ousted the head of the Organisation for
the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. He scuttled the nuclear
test ban treaty and the UN conference on the illicit trade
in small arms and light weapons. And he was behind the
renunciation of the US signature on the 1998 Rome statute
creating the international criminal court. He described
sending his letter notifying the UN secretary general,
Kofi Annan, as "the happiest moment of my government
service".
Bolton's meddling in diplomacy on nonproliferation
with North Korea and Iran guaranteed that the allies had
no unified position and encouraged the Koreans and Iranians
to play the nuclear card. Bolton's response to these crises
has been to lead the charge to remove the UN head of the
International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei.
In late November, Bolton denounced the Blair government
and the Europeans negotiating with the Iranians as "soft"
for attempting "diplomatic means".
Bolton might be granted the integrity of his primitivism,
a true believer who imagines Fortress America besieged
by the UN and Europeans - "Americanists find themselves
surrounded by small armies of globalists, each tightly
clutching a favourite new treaty or multilateralist proposal".
But Bolton's coarse ideology is
advanced by sophisticated campaigns of disinformation
- and not only on Iraq and North Korea. His leaks of falsehoods
that Syria and Cuba had developed weapons of mass destruction
sparked internal revolts by intelligence professionals
and the foreign service.
Like his allies the neoconservatives, for Bolton the
ends justify the means. But unlike them he has no use
for romantic rhetoric about the "march of freedom"
and "democracy", as he demonstrated so effectively
in Florida. And now he has the job he sought above all
from the beginning. |
MADRID - Leaders and personalities
from around the world meeting this week in the Spanish
capital will attempt to agree on a global definition
of the word "terrorism" and recommend measures
on how to fight it.
The International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and
Security organised by the Club of Madrid is bringing
together some 200 experts and political leaders, including
heads of state and former presidents, Tuesday through
Friday.
The Club of Madrid, whose members include 50 former
heads of state and government, describes itself as an
independent organisation dedicated to fomenting and
strengthening democracy around the world.
The aim of the conference is to come up with a common
international framework for fighting terrorism while
protecting democracy, and to reach a consensus on the
definition of terrorism, which is expected to be one
of the most difficult tasks.
According to the Royal Spanish Academy dictionary,
terror is an "expeditious method of revolutionary
and counterrevolutionary justice", and terrorism
is "domination by terror" and "acts of
violence carried out to generate terror."
Spanish Judge Baltasar Garzón,
internationally renowned for his attempt to bring former
military leaders of the Chilean and Argentine dictatorships
to justice, told IPS that "any attack or aggression
against the civilian population is a terrorist crime,
whether staged by civilian, insurgent or terrorist groups,
or regular armies."
An early proponent of terrorism as a doctrine was a
German radical democrat, Karl Heinzen, who wrote in
a 1848 essay, Der Mord (Murder), that all means were
valid to hasten the advent of democracy: "If you
have to blow up half a continent and cause a bloodbath
to destroy the party of barbarism, you should have no
scruples of conscience. Anyone who would not joyously
sacrifice his life for the satisfaction of exterminating
a million barbarians is not a true republican."
And during the French Revolution (1789-1799), the Jacobin
party ushered in what became known as the "Reign
of Terror". Determined to impose deep social reforms,
the Jacobins executed thousands of their opponents by
guillotine. [...]
There are also discrepancies between the lists of terrorist
organisations drawn up by different governments. For
example, the Islamic movement Hezbollah is included
on the U.S. State Department's annual list, but not
on the one drawn up by the European Union last May.
Definitions can also shift depending on the time period
and the interests at stake. Mohammed Abdelkefi, the
Madrid correspondent for the London-based newspaper
Al Arab, cited the example of the Islamist Taliban movement
in Afghanistan.
"When they were fighting the Soviet
Union they were 'freedom fighters'. Later, although
they were still fighting foreign occupation (led by
the U.S.), they became 'terrorists'," Abdelkefi
told IPS.
"Were the Spaniards who rose up against Napoleon's
French troops who occupied Spain terrorists? And were
the French resistance fighters waging terrorism in their
fight against the Nazi occupation?
"What is it called when troops
break into people's homes late at night, destroying
doors and household furnishings, raping women, humiliating
and mistreating men and stealing jewelry and money?"
asked Abdelkefi, referring to actions that U.S. troops
have carried out in Iraq according to press reports.
"Is it terrorism to bomb houses
and entire neighbourhoods, killing everyone who lives
there with the excuse of going after one single person?"
he added, alluding to U.S. bombing in Iraq since the
March 2003 invasion of that Middle Eastern country.
Speaking at the conference, the head of the New York-based
Human Rights Watch, Kenneth Roth, called it counterproductive
to support authoritarian governments as allies in the
fight against terrorism, because "open" political
systems are the best way to convince angry young people
to channel their indignation in a peaceful manner.
The European coordinator of the Coalition
for the International Criminal Court, Irune Aguirrezábal,
said violence is not the best weapon against terrorism.
"It is essential to analyse the roots, including
religious fanaticism, poverty, inequality and lack of
democracy," in order to work towards the prevention
and persecution of terrorism, while fully respecting
the law and human rights, said the activist. [...]
Cardoso said democracy is not merely
the only legitimate way to combat terrorism, but also
the only effective way to do it, because freedom can
only be saved by freedom, and the fight against terrorism
can only be successful if it is based on the reign of
law. |
Israel's
aid to illegal settlers
An inquiry revealed official complicity in setting up some
105 unauthorized outposts. |
By Ben Lynfield | Correspondent
of The Christian Science Monitor |
JERUSALEM – Illegal
settler outposts that are consolidating Israel's grip on
the West Bank are not pirate operations by hard-line settlers.
They are established, maintained, and expanded with the
backing of the Israeli government. That
charge, which cuts to the heart of one of the more loaded
issues of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, is no longer
made only by dovish Israelis or Palestinians. It's now
the official finding of a report commissioned by Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon, which was released Wednesday.
The report marks an embarrassment to Mr. Sharon and could
intensify American calls for Israel to dismantle outposts
in accordance with the international peace blueprint known
as the road map. But the document, which does not implicate
Sharon personally in illegalities, is not expected to
have much of a political impact in Israel even though
it was after Sharon became premier in March 2001 that
the pace of outpost building greatly accelerated.
"People realize the whole Gaza disengagement depends
on Sharon and don't want to put that in jeopardy,"
says Leslie Susser, diplomatic correspondent of the Jerusalem
Report magazine. "For that reason I don't see a political
move by the left, and for the right to try to get Sharon
for playing their game would be disingenuous. Legally,
he probably has not left any fingerprints."
The 300-page report compiled by
former state attorney Talia Sasson finds that the government
funds the establishment of "at least part" of
the outposts, a term used to describe settlement activity
that was never formally endorsed by the cabinet and is
therefore illegal according to Israeli law. Israel
uses the term settlements to describe the more established
communities in the occupied territories, where 240,000
settlers live. These are authorized and in accordance
with Israeli law, but contravene the Fourth Geneva Convention
by virtually everyone's interpretation except Israel's.
The US-backed road map calls on
Israel to "immediately" dismantle outposts erected
since March 2001. Few have been removed in practice and
in some cases new ones have sprung up. Ms. Sasson
said Wednesday that permanent housing and digging to bring
in more mobile homes is under way at some outposts, adding
that taking over lands and paving roads for them are "daily
occurrences."
She estimated the number of outposts at 105, but said
there could be more than that.
According to the dovish Peace Now group, 50 outposts
were established after March 2001. Peace Now staffer Dror
Etkes says the group feels "some kind of vindication"
for its longstanding arguments.
But he predicts that the Sasson report will deal a setback
to those trying to end settlement construction and achieve
a territorial compromise with the Palestinians.
"The risk of this report is that people forget the
bigger story, the settlements, of which the outposts are
just one small chapter," he says.
The housing ministry, Sasson said, provided
hundreds of mobile homes to outposts and channeled millions
of dollars to them. Military administrators did not enforce
the law and allowed 54 outposts to be constructed on private
Palestinian land and other officials ensured that outposts
were hooked up to electricity and other services, she
wrote.
The Sharon government has said repeatedly
that Israel's policy is not to establish new settlements.
In the view of Yossi Alpher, former director of the Jaffee
Center for Strategic Studies, the report "will strengthen
the hand of anyone, including President Bush or [new Housing
Minister Yitzhak] Herzog who wants to do anything about
the outposts." But, he added, Sharon may have a convincing
answer if there is increased US pressure, namely that
he should not be asked to fight the settlers on two fronts
simultaneously.
"I think that what Sharon believes is that to have
fiascos of trying to dismantle outposts while getting
ready for the huge task of Gaza withdrawal is distracting
and will whip up settler anger. He thinks it is better
to bide time with the outposts and get out of Gaza first,"
he says.
Sasson recommended that the attorney general decide whether
investigations should be launched against some of those
involved in funneling money to the outposts.
Sharon spokesman Raanan Gissin said a tangle of overlapping
legal codes in the West Bank - military, civilian, Israeli,
and Jordanian - "creates the possibility for those
who want to use the law or misuse the law to do so." |
JERUSALEM - An inquiry commissioned
by Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on Wednesday
recommended possible prosecution of public officials
for helping to spread unauthorized settler outposts
in the occupied West Bank.
Israel is meant to remove the outposts under a U.S.-backed
peace plan, but the report said officials at the defense
and housing ministries and the
quasi-governmental World Zionist Organization
as well as army administrators had worked to encourage
them. [...] |
The report said outposts built
on Palestinian land are totally illegal and should be
dismantled immediately.
GAZA CITY, March 9, 2005 (IslamOnline.net & News
Agencies) – An Israeli report Wednesday, March
9, slammed Tel Aviv for building scores of illegal West
Bank settlements, leaving Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
red-faced and raising serious question marks over Israeli
pledges to seek peace.
“Transgressing the law has become the norm in
several official organs when it comes to rogue settlements,”
Agence France-Presse (AFP) quoted the report's author
Talia Sasson as telling a news conference Wednesday,
March 9.
Her report -– though commissioned by Sharon himself
-- concluded that government ministries either turned
a blind eye to or handed out millions of dollars to
help finance and build scores of settlements on the
occupied West Bank. |
Outspoken London mayor says Israeli
government threatens entire Western world by inspiring
terrorist groups.
JERUSALEM - London mayor Ken Livingstone accused the
Israeli government of inspiring terrorist network Al-Qaeda
in comments to Israel's right-wing Jerusalem Post newspaper
published on Tuesday.
The maverick mayor, a member of Britain's governing
Labour Party, stood by his claim that Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Shaorn is a war criminal, carried in
an article on Friday in Britain's Guardian newspaper.
In a written response to questions from Israel's English-language
daily, Livingstone said the Israeli government threatens
the entire Western world by inspiring terrorist groups
such as Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda.
"The threat is from the policies
of the current Israeli government, which in its abuse
of the human rights of the Palestinians... raises the
temperature of the Middle East to a boiling point -
thereby creating threats to all of us," the Post
quoted him as saying.
"This policy acts as a recruiting sergeant to
extremist groups such as Al-Qaeda who can pose as supporters
of the Palestinian cause.
"Only a just and lasting peace between Israel
and the Palestinians, will bring long-term security,"
Livingstone reportedly said. [...] |
Sharon's
cellmate
If my prime minister is a war criminal, so is Tony Blair |
Daphna Baram
The Guardian
Thursday March 10, 2005 |
I read Ken Livingstone's
article on these pages in which he explained his position
on Israel and anti-semitism with great care, and agreed
with it. I have always respected his unequivocal stance
against racism and I don't believe that he is anti-semitic.
And yet I am angry. I am angry with Ken and with the British
left generally. Please allow me to explain why.
I agree that my prime minister, Ariel Sharon, is a war
criminal. From the intentional killing of 69 civilians
in the village of Qibya in 1953, through the invasion
of Lebanon in 1982, all the way to the wild bombing of
Palestinian cities in the last few years, his career is
steeped in vile criminality. I have dedicated my adult
life to making this point, not only to my people, but
also to yours, and to the rest of the world. I believe
that international pressure is vital to change Israel's
policies, not only for the sake of the Palestinians, but
for Israelis too.
In the little political sub-culture of the non-Zionist
left which I come from, calling the prime minister a war
criminal is no big deal. Israelis tend to say what they
think out loud. The fact that so many on the British left
call my prime minister a war criminal too is fine by me.
But if justice is to be dispensed
evenly, what about your prime minister? Yes, Tony Blair,
the bloke who took the British army into Iraq and butchered
tens of thousands of Iraqis in an illegal war and under
a false pretext? What is he, exactly? I, for one, think
he deserves to share a cell with Ariel Sharon.
Indeed, Sharon may reasonably protest: he is yet to be
responsible for killings in such numbers.
Yes, I know the British left were against the war in
Iraq. But it is rare to hear them refer to Blair as "a
murderer", "a butcher", or "a war
criminal". Blair is more often presented, even by
ardent anti-war commentators, as "misled", "mistaken",
"sincere but wrong", "well meaning but
cheated by Bush", "acting out of great religious
conviction", and so on. Even Ken decided to rejoin
Mr Blair's party after the criminal invasion of Iraq,
and at a time when sinister hints as to British and American
intentions in Iran and Syria were already in the air.
This is what makes serious Jews and Israelis sneer at
his statements against Sharon.
The way to prove to liberal and left Israelis (they are
the only ones in Israel Ken stands a chance of convincing)
that he means what he says is to apply the same lofty
standards to Blair, and to use the same type of words
when describing their very similar activities.
So my message to the British left is:
either moderate your language when talking about Sharon,
or escalate it when talking about Blair. One way or another,
it is time to set equal standards. Occupation, torture,
killing and wars of aggression are as bad when committed
by Britain as when committed by anybody else. |
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel has
closed the case against soldiers accused of gunning
down a British cameraman in the Gaza Strip, drawing
charges of a cover-up from his relatives, who vowed
to sue the army.
James Miller was killed on May 3, 2003 in the flashpoint
refugee camp Rafah while making a documentary, "Death
in Gaza", about Palestinian children caught up
in fighting with Israel.
Witnesses said Israeli soldiers shot him at close range,
although he wore journalist insignia and waved a white
flag.
The documentary shows Miller, 34, approaching an armoured
vehicle in the dark before the fatal shots sound.
The army's top legal authority, Judge Advocate-General
Avichai Mandelblith, met Miller's relatives and told
them a two-year internal probe had not uncovered proof
of wrongdoing. [...] |
PA spokesman slams Israel's side-stepping
in weeks since. Sharm el-Sheikh summit.
The Palestinian Authority on Thursday accused Israel
of dragging its feet over promised confidence-building
gestures after talks stalled on West Bank security handovers
and a gunman was killed.
"Israel is prevaricating over carrying out its
Sharm el-Sheikh resolutions," chief Palestinian
negotiator Saeb Erakat told Voice of Palestine radio
from Madrid where he was to attend an anti-terrorism
conference.
At Middle East summit in Egypt last month, Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Palestinian leader Mahmud
Abbas declared an end to more than four years of violence
and announced a series of confidence-building measures.
In the Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, Sharon pledged
to release 900 Palestinian prisoners and transfer security
control in five West Bank towns - Ramallah, Bethlehem,
Qalqilya, Tulkarem and Jericho - to the PA.
But two rounds of talks on such a handover in Jericho
ended in deadlock on Wednesday, with Palestinian officials
accusing the Israeli commanders of refusing to relinquish
control of checkpoints and the wider area.
Less than 24 hours earlier, Israeli Defence Minister
Shaul Mofaz had said Israel would hand over Jericho
and Tulkarem to the Palestinian Authority "in the
coming days" after talks with Abbas.
"The Israelis do not want to remove the roadblocks
suffocating Jericho and Tulkarem, not to mention other
regions in the West Bank," Erakat said.
"We are asking them to respect their commitments,"
he added, appealing to the international community to
put pressure on Israel to make good on their Sharm el-Sheikh
promises. |
WASHINGTON - Declaring
that "clearly and suddenly, the thaw has begun"
that will allow democratic reforms in the Middle East,
President George W. Bush yesterday praised what he called
new signs of change in the region while heightening pressure
on Syria to end its years-long occupation of Lebanon.
"By now it should be clear that authoritarian rule
is not the wave of the future. It is the last gasp of
a discredited past," Bush said during a speech at
the National Defense University in Washington.
Speaking on the same day that a half-million pro-Syrian
demonstrators took to the streets in Beirut with anti-U.S.
slogans, he called on "all Syrian military forces
and intelligence personnel" to withdraw from Lebanon
before the May parliamentary elections, in order "for
those elections to be free and fair." He charged
that Syrian President Bashar Assad's recent promised pullout
was a delay tactic, although some Syrian troops did begin
redeploying yesterday to the Bekaa Valley in eastern Lebanon.
The television image of Bush criticizing Syria even while
pro-Syrian demonstrations were in progress underscored
the complex political fault lines of the region. The president
praised the anti-Syrian protests that had erupted after
the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri,
and which prompted the country's pro-Syrian governor to
resign. Directing his remarks to the Lebanese people,
Bush said: "All the world is witnessing your great
movement of conscience. Lebanon's future belongs in your
hands, and by your courage, Lebanon's future will be in
your hands."
The president also spoke broadly about the prospects
for the advance of democracy in the Middle East. He likened
the developments in Lebanon to the recent elections in
Iraq, Afghanistan and the Palestinian territories and
to the apparent new openness to democratic reforms by
the leaders of Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Bush also accused Syria and Iran of continuing to support
terrorism and said Iran and other nations should view
the Iraq elections as an "example," seemingly
inviting Iranians to rise up against the government.
His remarks marked his first formal foreign policy speech
since he declared in his Jan. 20 inaugural address a sweeping
U.S. doctrine to "seek and support the growth of
democratic movements and institutions in every nation
and culture."
At the time, critics decried the doctrine as unrealistic.
But yesterday's speech reflected renewed confidence by
the White House, coming in the wake of the successful
Iraqi elections, promises by Egyptian President Hosni
Mubarak to permit opposition in the next presidential
election there and events in Lebanon that have renewed
scrutiny of Syria.
The president stopped short of taking credit for the
changes. He said change in the region required patience,
given the entrenchment of tyrants and "deeply ingrained
habits of fear" that persist among the people.
"For all of these reasons," he said, "the
chances of democratic progress in the broader Middle East
have seemed frozen in place for decades. Yet at last,
clearly and suddenly, the thaw has begun." |
BEIJING, Mar. 10 (Xinhuanet)
-- Although American intelligence agencies conclude that
Al-Qaeda has sought to recruit and train indiviuals to attack
the United States, the FBI has not
identified any "sleeper agents" of Osama bin Laden's
network in this country so far.
A secret FBI report obtained by ABC News says that Al-Qaeda's
capability to hit the United States is unclear.
The conclusion seems to differ from testimony given
by FBI Director Robert Mueller, who warned in the past
that several sleeper cells were probably in place.
"Our greatest threat is from al Qaeda cells in
the United States that we have not yet been able to identify,"
Mueller said at a hearing in February 2003. |
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A police officer
twice used a Taser stun device on a drug suspect who
was restrained to a hospital bed because the man refused
to give a urine sample to medical staff, authorities
said.
Antonio Wheeler, 18, was arrested Friday on a drug
charge and taken to an emergency room after telling
officers he had consumed cocaine, police said.
Because Wheeler said he had used the drugs, Florida
Hospital officials wanted a urine sample. But a police
affidavit said Wheeler didn't provide a sample on his
own and workers tried to catheterize him.
The police document said Wheeler was handcuffed to
a hospital bed and then secured with leather straps
after he refused to urinate in a cup. When medical staff
tried to insert a catheter to get the sample, Wheeler
refused and began thrashing around, the affidavit said.
At one point, police officer Peter Linnenkamp noted
that he jumped on the bed with his knees on Wheeler's
chest to restrain him. Then,
when Wheeler still refused to let the catheter be inserted,
Linnenkamp said he twice used his Taser, which sends
50,000 volts into a target.
"After the second shock (Wheeler) stated he would
urinate and calmed down enough to be given the portable
urinal," Linnenkamp wrote. [...]
"I feel I was basically raped," Wheeler said.
[...] |
WARSAW, March 9 (Xinhuanet)
-- Polish Deputy Prime Minister Jerzy Hausner announced
his resignation Wednesday after he quit the ruling Democratic
Left Alliance last month and decided to set up anew centrist
party.
Hausner, also Poland's economy minister, told a news
conference in western Poland that his resignation was
submitted to Prime Minister Marek Belka on Tuesday.
A spokesperson for the Polish government said Wednesday
that Belka will soon set a date to accept the resignation.
He hopes Hausner will stay on till a successor is chosen.
Hausner quit the ruling alliance in early February.
He later vowed to create a centrist force, the Democratic
Party, along with the leader of the Freedom Union Wladyslaw
Frasyniuk.
Poland is set to hold presidential and parliamentary
elections this year. The parliamentary race will be held
ahead of schedule as the Democratic Left Alliance has
lost its once huge majority following a string of corruption
scandals. |
WASHINGTON - The failure
of an interceptor missile in a missile defense test on Feb.
14 was caused when one of three supporting arms inside the
interceptor's silo did not fall free of the weapon, a senior
US military official said on Wednesday.
It was a repeat of an aborted December test in which
the interceptor missile also failed to launch because
of a minor software problem. [...]
The United States has recently suffered two setbacks
in the missile defense test in a row.
Last month, an interceptor missile supposed to shoot
down the target missile fired from Kodiak Island, Alaska,
did not take off from Kwajalein Island in the Pacific
Ocean. This followed an abortion on Dec. 15 of the first
flight test of the system in two years. [...]
Obering also said that Pentagon would resume the test
as early as the end of April. |
It was the boom that promised to
make millions rich – yet five years to the day
from the peak of the dotcom fervour, investors are still
counting the cost.
Investors thought they could earn endless amounts of
money from technology stocks, until the realisation
dawned that most of the companies had yet to deliver
and the bubble began to burst.
Many companies whose value soared to astronomical levels
are still to make a profit and the experience has left
many nervous about ploughing into the sector again.
Famous names such as lastminute.com and telecoms equipment
group Marconi are now a far cry from their previous
values, while ISA investments based on technology stocks
were reduced to virtually nothing. [...] |
Economists and precious metals
experts throughout the country who track market indicators
and money trends worldwide, are wondering why the American
people continue to ignore what they call "hard
facts" that America's "recovering" economy
is nothing more than a smokescreen to cover up the continued
"borrowing to spend" practices of Congress.
These experts warn that when the bubble finally bursts,
it will make 1929 look like a walk in the park.
Last week saw jittery investors as the euro hit $1.32
and the dollar tumbled - again. The U.S. currency continues
to fall in dangerous levels against rival currencies
throughout the world. Asian banks have traditionally
held their reserves in U.S. dollar denominated U.S.
Treasury securities.
The U.S. dollar's weakness up against the euro pushed
up gold last week to around $431 a troy ounce. Oil has
once again jumped over the $51.00 per barrel mark. Crude
is expected to remain in the $45-$50 dollar range throughout
2005.
Last week, billionaire investor, George Soros, who
spent tens of millions of dollars to unseat George Bush,
Jr., in the last election, warned at a recent conference
in Saudi Arabia that if Middle East oil exporters and
Russia would switch some of their revenues from dollars
to euros, it could push the U.S. to a "tipping
point." Billionaires like Warren Buffett have been
buying up gold at a rate that most Americans can't even
relate to, but those in the industry say Americans should
pay attention when someone like Buffett is giving up
the paper for gold.
Tension in currency and stock markets last week were
prompted over Sir Alan Greenspan's testimony in front
of Congress and worries that a rise in inflation could
promopt the nation's bank, the Federal Reserve to step
up interest rate increases.
In his recent column, 'Four Fed Hikes and a Funeral,'
Ron Kirby had this to say about one of the government's
largest debt obligations:
"The myth of the social security trust fund died
last week. The lack of candor not withstanding, on the
part of his eminence – Easy Al Greenspan; enough
layers of the onion were peeled back that it was revealed
for once and for all – more rotten onion. Actually,
for those who could still bear to watch and listen without
crying, they learned that the system is, in fact, worse
than broke. Admittedly, a heck of a lot of folks still
don’t get it. This fact is pointedly articulated
by Jim Puplava in his Financial Sense Newshour [Feb
19 -1st hr] and his take on Alan Greenspan’s semi
annual testimony to law makers up on Capitol Hill last
week. Listening to the Big Easy explain the state of
solvency [or lack thereof] to the esteemed Congresswoman-D,
N.Y., Carolyn Maloney last week provided us all [as
if it was needed] with conclusive evidence as to the
lengths he will go to – to twist, pervert and
otherwise obfuscate our reality. I use the term “our
reality” only because I know, in my heart of hearts,
the man really knows better."
Bob Chapman, known for his uncanny accuracy in predicting
the markets and the financial pulse of America's economy,
had this to say in his International Forecaster newsletter:
"Over the past decade, productivity growth on
average has been about 2-1/2%, which is historically
normal. It has not been 4-5% as described by government
statistics and Sir Alan Greenspan. This is simply another
lie in the process of psychological warfare, which is
used to brainwash the American public. There has been
no productivity miracle, but there has been a budget
and current account balance disaster. Real rates of
return on investment have not come from productivity
but from the use of third world slave labor. It is similar
to profits of the opium trade between India and China,
which British and American families engaged in during
the 19th century. This is how the great American fortunes
were begun and how the British Royal Family became enormously
rich.
"This exodus of manufacturing capabilities over
these ten years has caused US exports to drop from 24%
of GDP to 13% of GDP. As this transpired, deficits continued
to grow and naturally the dollar began its decent. That
decent was not allowed to occur until five years ago,
because prior to that the Clinton administration via
Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin artificially increased
or stabilized the dollar. That was accomplished via
the working Group on Financial Markets and the Federal
Reserve’s monetary policy, the use of the repo
pool and the suppression of gold prices. This false
dollar value caused imports to exceed exports by some
50%.
"Cheap foreign goods become even cheaper and that
excited the Fed because it suppressed inflation. There
was an assist as well as exporters began to accumulate
large dollar balances, which they in turn used to buy
US Treasuries and agencies, which continued to allow
the profligate spending of the American consumer. The
result was a relentlessly rising trade and current account
deficit. This easy money and credit underwritten by
foreigners and the Federal Reserve exacerbated the situation
by allowing spending to exceed income as real wages
fell under the pressure of outsourcing and illegal immigration.
In order to maintain their lifestyle, consumers have
fallen deeper and deeper into debt. The Bureau of Labor
Statistics tells us that hedonically our inflation is
3.3%, when in fact it is considerably higher. That phantom
inflation has bitten deeply into consumer purchasing
power.
"Under free trade and globalization, the more
we import the less we produce. We can never compete
with third world wages. That is why we always had tariffs,
duties and imports. Had we not had them, America would
have never prospered over the last 225 years. America’s
economy would have always been inundated with cheap
foreign goods and our standard of living would be that
of a third world country.
"When we import goods our purchasing power falls
and no real wealth is built within our country, and
as you well know our jobs are shipped to the third world.
Furthermore, we do not need cheap goods. We did just
fine before those cheap goods were allowed to arrive
in such numbers. If we do not stop free trade and the
machinations of WTO and NATA or CAFTA and FTAA, were
they to become law, we would be doomed. Generally, both
political parties back these treaties and amnesty. Our
elected representatives know in most cases over 60%
of their constituents are opposed to these issues, yet
they continually vote for them."
Not everyone is enamored of the privately owned Federal
Reserve Banking system. Several years ago, the Von Mises
Institute at Auburn Univeristy commented, "Today
the Fed attempts to coordinate world-wide inflation
as the major banks once attempted to coordinate nationwide
inflation. The major banks once agreed among themselves
to bail out bankrupt banks to prop up the domestic financial
system; now the Fed bails out central banks of other
countries to prop up the entire international financial
system. The logical end of this monetary interventionism
is a single world-wide central bank with unlimited,
coordinated inflation: in short, the dream of John Maynard
Keynes. "But why would anyone desire this, especially
after a century of Fed-caused inflation, business cycles,
world wars, welfarism, statism, financial insecurity,
and cultural collapse? Government and its connected
interests do, but for everyone else, it would be a disaster,
no matter what Alan Greenspan says." It would appear
that the same conditions exist today and that not much
"recovery" has been made, but in fact, the
debt load continues to stagger even long time market
investors and econonomists.
Pros say their position is right on the mark and the
worst is yet to come. Before the crash in 1929, the
premier economists of the time who supported the monetary
policies of the day, reassured the American people that
all was well at Wall & Broad. History shows they
were dead wrong. While most Americans believe the 1929
stock market crash caused the Great Depression of the
'30s, others point to the actual cause being the Federal
Reserve's manipulating the money supply during the 1920s
and 1930s.
Despite the ability for the central bank to print up
paper that has no value (fiat currency), many are worried
that even with all this flooding of "prop up"
money by the FED, will it be enough to meet the extreme
challenges in a few years when the baby boomer retire
with an immediate debt load of $71 trillion dollars?
Since there is no money in the U.S. Treasury and all
income tax dollars go to pay the central bank for borrowing
by Congress so they can continue to spend, only time
will tell if America is indeed headed for a severe depression.
|
Geneva - International agency Oxfam
calls on the US to implement swiftly today's final World
Trade Organization (WTO) ruling against its illegal
cotton payment programs and agree to new global trade
rules that would stop the dumping of cheap commodities.
Eliminating cotton subsidies is necessary to fulfill
WTO obligations and bring relief to the millions of
struggling farmers in poor countries. It is crucial
that the US signals its readiness to reform its farm
subsidies within current WTO negotiations to successfully
negotiate a new global trade agreement.
"The case against US cotton dumping is overwhelming
and now confirmed yet again by the WTO," said Celine
Charveriat, spokesperson for Oxfam's Make Trade Fair
campaign. "The debate is over. The US must now
move quickly to reform its programs and stop dumping
cheap cotton onto world markets that undermines the
livelihoods of poor farmers in the developing world."
In September 2004, a WTO dispute
panel found that $3.2 billion in annual cotton subsidies
and $1.6 billion in export credits paid by the US in
cotton and other commodities were illegal under WTO
rules. The case, brought by Brazil and supported
by some West African cotton-producing countries (Benin
and Chad), was appealed by the US in October. Today's
appeal decision is final and the US has until July 1
this year to comply or face possible trade sanctions
by Brazil. [...]
Oxfam estimates that US dumping caused losses of almost
$400 million between 2001 and 2003 for poor African
cotton-producing countries, where more than 10 million
people depend directly on the crop. A typical small-scale
West African cotton producer makes less than $400 a
year on his crop. Two million cotton farmers in Mali
were recently pressured to accept a further price drop
of 25%-many of them will not now be able to cover their
production costs.
The majority (78%) of US cotton
subsidies benefit the largest 10% of cotton producers.
Loopholes in the subsidy rules allow industrial-sized
farms to collect payments in excess of $1 million, while
smaller farmers in the U.S. and abroad are driven out
of farming by low commodity prices and high land costs.
The case has implications beyond cotton. "This
case raises deep questions about the entire US subsidy
system. US subsidies have distorted global markets,
failed to save small US farmers, and promoted environmental
damage. The US should see this ruling as an opportunity
for reform," Charveriat said. [...] |
WASHINGTON - The American way of
life is taking a hit from a crumbling infrastructure.
A report being released today by the
American Society of Civil Engineers gives it a rating
of "D," down from a "D-plus" two
years ago.
Infrastructure includes things like
roads, bridges, water systems, the power grid and public
parks.
Today's report card says Americans are spending more
time stuck in traffic and less time at home with their
families.
The study says it would take more
than one and a half trillion
dollars over the next five years to fix things.
The engineer's report gives America's drinking water
system a "D-minus" and figures it would cost
eleven billion dollars a year
to bring it up to speed. |
NEW YORK - The dollar weakened
broadly on Wednesday with selling pressure unabated
following a technically driven sell-off in the previous
session.
Two days ahead of U.S. trade data, concerns about the
U.S. current account deficit and the willingness of
foreigners to continue funding it are adding to the
dollar's woes.
Constant talk of central bank reserve diversification,
Middle East tensions and instability were just more
reasons to sell cited by investors wary of holding dollars.
[...]
But the main focus this week for dollar investors remains
Friday's U.S. trade data, expected to show the deficit
widened to $56.50 billion in January from $56.40 billion
in December, a move closer to record levels hit late
last year.
Some investors are building in expectations for a more
serious deterioration in the deficit to as much as $60
billion, traders said, which would only highlight the
United States' massive financing needs and push the
currency lower again. [...]
A sharp sell-off in U.S. Treasuries which pushed yields
on the 10-year note up to 4.51 percent , the highest
level since July, also failed to be dollar supportive.
"One argument is clearly
that higher yields will lift the dollar and the other
argument is that foreign sales of Treasuries will involve
sales of dollars and hence the dollar will fall,"
wrote Steve Barrow, chief currency strategist at Bear
Stearns in London, in a research note on Wednesday.
"Our bias is to trade on
the latter view, but clearly we could be wrong."
[...] |
NEW YORK - The dollar weakened
on Thursday against most currencies on concerns over
global central bank reserve diversification, a widening
U.S. trade deficit and tumbling bond prices.
"We're just in a general dollar downtrend right
now," said Sophia Drossos, currency strategist
at Morgan Stanley in New York.
Having slumped to multi-month lows against its major
counterparts on Wednesday, the
dollar suffered another blow on Thursday after Japanese
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi told parliament that,
generally speaking, diversity in foreign exchange reserves
was a good thing.
The Ministry of Finance, which manages the world's
largest foreign reserve holding of $840.6 billion, quickly
clarified that it has no plans to shift funds out of
the dollars. [...] |
Morgan Stanley, the
world's second-largest securities firm by capital, and
Deutsche Bank AG are adding emergency offices in Tokyo
amid growing concern an earthquake will knock them out
of business in Japan's capital.
"The cost isn't cheap, but it's insurance,'' said
Thomas Riley, 47, managing director of Morgan Stanley's
Tokyo branch. Duplicate trading floors linked to the Tokyo
Stock Exchange cost $10 million to build and $5 million
a year to maintain, said Masatoshi Suzuki, who studies
risk management at the Japan Research Institute Ltd. in
Tokyo.
The number of major earthquakes in the
Tokyo area increased by 37 percent since 2000, compared
with the previous four years. The Japanese capital has
a 70 percent chance of being hit by a magnitude 7 temblor
in the next 30 years, government researchers said in August.
"The sense of urgency has been rising,'' said Keiji
Doi, an associate professor at the University of Tokyo's
Earthquake Research Institute. "The metropolitan
area is high-risk.''
New York-based Morgan Stanley, which has had backup offices
in New York and London since the early 1990s, opened its
first Tokyo center in 2003 and is preparing another now,
Riley said.
Deutsche Bank, Europe's third-largest bank by assets,
may add a third backup office in Tokyo as soon as 2008,
said Charles Underwood, 48, the head of business continuity
at the bank's Tokyo brokerage house.
Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank already has a duplicate
headquarters and a data backup center in Japan's capital.
Deutsche Bank's Plans
"The riskiest thing is not
an earthquake,'' Underwood said. "Our business can
be required to shut for a bomb threat or a fire in the
basement. Meanwhile, our clients are still working normally,
the competition is working normally.'' [...]
Local brokerage houses had always calculated
that a temblor would destroy both them and their competitors,
said researcher Suzuki. The Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on
New York and Washington alerted them to other dangers.
"After 9/11, they saw that
rivals could take their share of business,'' Suzuki said.
"It was a kind of dawn.'' Risk- management
manuals now contain a "recovery'' section, whereas
"emergency'' used to be the final chapter, he said.
[...]
93 Earthquakes
Tokyo was rocked by 93 earthquakes measuring
more than five on Japan's seven-stage seismic scale in
the four years to Dec. 31, 2004, according to the Meteorological
Agency. That compares with 68 temblors in the previous
four years. The capital was destroyed in 1923 by a quake
measuring 7.9 on the Richter scale.
Today, a magnitude 7.3 quake in Tokyo
would kill as many as 13,000 people and cost the Japanese
economy about 112 trillion yen ($1 trillion), a government
panel estimated on Feb. 25. [...]
Beds, Emergency Food
About 500 computers in a client data center on the third
floor, trading rooms on the fourth and fifth floors, and
a command control center on the sixth floor are connected
at all times to the bank's headquarters, said Andrew Gilhooley,
Morgan Stanley's vice president of information technology.
The basement contains a generator, a 400,000-liter tank
of oil and mainstays that allow the building to move 50
centimeters laterally in an earthquake.
Deutsche Bank's duplicate office in Hachioji City, 35
kilometers west of its Tokyo headquarters in Nagatacho,
has 350 desks and computers, 50 beds, showers, and emergency
food and water supplies spread over two stories, Underwood
said. The data backup center is 10 kilometers from Hachioji,
he said. [...]
Morgan Stanley updates its earthquake contingency plan
every quarter, Riley said. Employees get regular evacuation
training and must complete a written exam each year on
subjects such as how to reach the emergency office, he
said.
"The insurance premium is 500 empty desks,'' Riley
said.
|
The Popocatepetl volcano
near Mexico City sent out a plume or ash and steam today,
starting a brush fire that soldiers and emergency crews
moved in to control.
The government’s National Council for the Prevention
of Disasters said the fire occurred near the town of San
Nicolas de los Ranchos, but did not pose any threat to
area residents.
Located 40 miles from Mexico City, the 17,886-foot volcano
has been largely calm recently, following several years
of intermittent activity that sometimes caused ash falls
over nearby communities. |
WELLINGTON - A tornado tore through
the town of Greymouth on New Zealand's southern West
Coast, demolishing buildings and tossing shipping containers
into the air.
The tornado cut a swathe 300 metres (yards) wide through
the town and "it was just a mass of timber and
roofs coming through the sky... the damage is just unbelievable",
Grey District mayor Tony Kokshoorn said.
He said the roof of one of the biggest buildings in
town had lifted and came flying through the air towards
him as he drove away from council chambers.
"I couldn't believe it -- I just dived into the
back seat," he said. [...] |
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. - The mother and
grandmother of a toddler who died in December face criminal
charges for allegedly neglecting his severe diaper rash,
leading to a fatal infection.
Amy Livingston, 27, of Johnstown, was charged Tuesday
with involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment
in the Dec. 12 death of her 15-month-old son, Harley.
She was charged with a second count of child endangerment
because another son, 3-year-old Hunter, also had severe
diaper rash, authorities said. [...]
The younger boy developed sepsis, a life-threatening
infection, because the rash was so bad, Cambria County
Coroner Dennis Kwiatkowski said.
"It's probably the worst I've ever seen,"
Kwiatkowski said. [...] |
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - The adoptive
parents of a 17-year-old boy who weighed 49 pounds when
found in a home where he was forced to wear a diaper
and sleep in a locked, cage-like bed have been charged
with child neglect, authorities said.
Child welfare workers called to Wilson and Brenda Sullivan's
home Jan. 10 found the teen wearing a diaper and appearing
developmentally delayed, a police report said. The boy
was less than 4-foot-6 and was in the weight range of
a 61/2-year-old, officials said.
Chief Steve Weintraub of the Jacksonville Sheriff's
Office said the parents told investigators that the
boy was forced to sleep in a criblike cage with a wooden
lid kept shut with chains and a lock because he had
behavioral problems and was overeating at night. The
crib was the size of a twin bed with locks that prevented
its sides from being lowered. [...] |
Hackers have compromised databases
belonging to LexisNexis and stolen information on at
least 32,000 people, according to a statement Wednesday
from LexisNexis' parent company, Reed Elsevier PLC.
The hackers stole passwords,
names, addresses, Social Security and drivers license
numbers of legitimate customers of the company's
Seisint division. Seisint collects data on individuals
that is used by law enforcement and private companies
for debt recovery, fraud detection and other services.
LexisNexis identified the incidents
in a review of security procedures and warned that there
may be more incidents of data theft, Reed Elsevier
said. [...]
The incident is just the latest in a series of revelations
about consumer data being leaked or lost. Those
incidents include the ChoicePoint hack and Bank of America
Corp.'s disclosure last week that it lost digital tapes
containing the credit card account records of 1.2 million
federal employees, including 60 U.S. senators. [...] |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|