|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Ice Crystals
©2004 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
Readers will no doubt remember
back to this time two years ago. Iraq was 'front and
center' in the world's media pages, the Bush team,
urged on by the Neocons and Israel, had been to the
UN with their bogus evidence of Iraqi WMDs and George
was getting ready to announce to the world that, regardless
of the lack of evidence, the greatest military power
on earth stood ready to pummel the Iraqi people into
submission. As a final 'pre-shock and awe' effort
to secure the backing of as much of the population
as possible, George reminded us all of just how evil
Saddam really was. From the Azores "summit",
where he had been conspiring with Blair and Aznar,
Bush told
the world:
"On this very day 15 years ago, Saddam Hussein
launched a chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi
village of Halabja. With a single order the Iraqi
regime killed thousands of men and women and children,
without mercy or without shame. Saddam Hussein has
proven he is capable of any crime. We must not permit
his crimes to reach across the world."
Strong and emotional words. Of course, they were
designed to be. It was with considerable vexation
therefore, but little surprise, that we read the following
report from the new Iraqi government's Ministry of
Health:
U.S.
used banned weapons in Fallujah – Health ministry
3/3/2005
Dr. Khalid ash-Shaykhli, an official at Iraq’s
health ministry, said that the U.S. military used
internationally banned weapons during its deadly
offensive in the city of Fallujah.
Dr. ash-Shaykhli was assigned by the ministry to
assess the health conditions in Fallujah following
the November assault there.
He said that researches, prepared
by his medical team, prove that U.S. occupation
forces used internationally prohibited substances,
including mustard gas, nerve gas, and other burning
chemicals in their attacks in the war-torn city.
The health official announced his findings at a
news conference in the health ministry building
in Baghdad.
The press conference was
attended by more than 20 Iraqi and foreign media
networks, including the Iraqi ash-Sharqiyah
TV network, the Iraqi as-Sabah newspaper, the
U.S. Washington Post and the Knight-Ridder
service.
Dr. ash-Shaykhli started the conference by reporting
the current health conditions of the Fallujah residents.
He said that the city is still suffering from the
effects of chemical substances and other types of
weapons that cause serious diseases over the long
term.
Asked whether limited nuclear weapons were also
used by U.S. forces in Fallujah, Dr. ash-Shaykhli
said; "What I saw during our research in Fallujah
leads me to me believe everything that has been
said about that battle.
"I absolutely do not exclude their use of
nuclear and chemical substances, since
all forms of nature were wiped out in that city.
I can even say that we found
dozens, if not hundreds, of stray dogs, cats, and
birds that had perished as a result of those gasses."
Dr. ash-Shaykhli promised to send the findings
of the researches to responsible bodies inside Iraq
and abroad.
Fallujah residents said napalm gas was used
During the U.S. offensive,
Fallujah residents reported that they saw "melted"
bodies in the city, which suggests that U.S.
forces used napalm gas, a
poisonous cocktail of polystyrene and jet fuel that
makes the human body melt.
In November, Labour MPs
in the UK demanded Prime Minister Tony Blair to
confront the Commons over the use of napalm gas
in Fallujah.
Saddam is a bad and evil man and had to be removed
from power because he used banned chemical weapons
against the Iraqi people. Yet when Bush orders that
similar banned chemical weapons be used against the
Iraqi people, he is lauded and praised as a defender
of "freedom and democracy". Is there something
wrong with this picture? Then again, there is nothing
new about the US government ordering the US of chemical
weapons against a civilian population.
Remember this?
That's the same Napalm cocktail that "melted"
Iraqi civilians in Fallujah last October, just before
Bush was returned to power to lead the American people
for four more 'glorious' years.
We think it is fitting therefore that we paraphrase
Bush when we state:
"On the 15th October 2004, President George
W Bush ordered a chemical weapons attack on the Iraqi
town of Fallujah. In a matter of days, the Bush regime
killed hundreds of men and women and children, without
mercy or without shame. George Bush has proven he
is capable of any crime. We must not permit his crimes
to reach across the world."
Indeed, none of us can afford to allow our so-called
"leaders" to lie, maim and murder any longer.
Sooner or later it will be our turn, and we need not
expect that there will be anyone to speak out in our
defence. It is time to call an end to the deception
and let the truth ring out loud and clear. |
Iraqi children are paying the
price for the occupation.
MOSUL, February 22, 2005 (IslamOnline.net) –
Almost two years after the
US-led forces occupied Iraq, the children of the northern
city of Mosul have united in grief and need, working
around the clock to help provide for their one-time
well-to-do families, who are now living below the
poverty line.
"I have dropped out of
school and I’m now selling plastic bags in the
city’s market to make ends meet," eight-year-old
Jamal Mohammad told IslamOnline.net. [...]
Hassan Ali, 10, is no better than the others. He
is forced to work as mechanic’s apprentice in
Al-Karama industrial district.
"My father was shot dead by US occupation forces
one year ago and I have no other option but to work
at this workshop for fixing cars," Ali told IOL
after an exhausting 14-hour workday.
Phenomenon
The backbreaking work has indeed
put years on Jamal and his fellow children, who have
become a phenomenon in post-invasion Iraqi society,
paying the silent cost of the US-led occupation.
Thousands of children have to labor at the crack
of dawn every day to provide for their destitute families.
The children can no longer enjoy themselves, leaving
the playgrounds and schools for traffic jams and workshops,
working as apprentices.[...]
A report by British NGO Medact revealed in November
that Iraqis will feel the brunt of the US-British
invasion for years and "maybe generations"
to come with the "alarming deterioration"
of the health care system in the war-ravaged country.
The Iraqi health ministry warned
in November that acute malnutrition among Iraqi children
has nearly doubled since the US invaded the country
in March 2003.
The United Nations children's fund
(UNICEF) had warned that the number of children who
suffer from diarrhea, Iraq's number one killer of
infants, has more than doubled under occupation. |
Dahr
Jamail is an independent journalist who has reported
extensively from occupied Iraq. He is currently on a
speaking tour, providing valuable first-hand accounts
that penetrate beyond most of the stories from Iraq
in the mainstream media. Jamail will be among the featured
speakers at the March 19 anti-war rally in Vancouver
on the second anniversary of the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq.
Derrick O'Keefe: You have been described as
an unembedded reporter in Iraq. What does it mean to
be unembedded in occupied Iraq today?
Dahr Jamail: Basically what that means is that
I don't embed with the military and that, unlike most
mainstream reporters, I actually leave my hotel and
go out and talk to Iraqis and get the story from the
street, rather than sending other people out to do that
for me or simply taking military press releases and
using that as the brunt of my information sources. So
that's the key differentiation.
D. O'K: And one of the places that you went
was Fallujah, after it was attacked. What did you find
after this most recent U.S. assault on Fallujah?
D. J.: Actually, the times that I went into
Fallujah were last April and May. I went in there in
April 2004, during that siege, and then in May several
times to follow up, documenting what happened there.
But I didn't actually go into the city after this last
November siege, mainly because the military created
a very strict cordon around the city and they weren't
letting any people — specifically journalists — in there.
Nor are they letting anyone in even today.
D. O'K: What's the best information we have
with respect to the actual situation in Fallujah today?
D. J.: Basically Fallujah
today closely resembles a concentration camp. The military
maintains that strict cordon; any of the people who
live there who want to go back into the city have to
get a retina scan and get finger-printed, and then get
an I.D. card made. Then they go through a very strict
checkpoint with full body searches, very intrusive searches.
Then they're allowed into the city, where at least 60
per cent of the city's been bombed to the ground. There's
no electricity, no water, and of course no jobs. So,
of the 350,000 people who lived there, roughly 25,000
have returned to try to sort out what's left of their
homes. It closely resembles a wasteland at this point.
D. O'K: Obviously that's a picture that we
don't get much of through the mainstream media here.
What do you find are some of the biggest misconceptions
about conditions in Iraq amongst the U.S. population?
D. J.: Well, the corporate media here in the
U.S. has done quite an amazing job of allowing Iraq
to fall right off the radar screens of the news since
the election. The impression that I've seen that people
are left with is that, “well, they've had these elections
so things must be better in Iraq.”
The reality is that things couldn't be further from
being resolved there. The violence is continuous on
a daily basis. It has gone on unabated since the elections
and, of course, the infrastructure is still in shambles,
and there's no withdrawal timetable in sight. So people
are obviously extremely misled as to what the realities
on the ground are in Iraq.
D. O'K: For those who are aware, and who have
been part of the anti-war movement in the United States,
there was clearly a slow-down in activism during the
presidential election. Do you see signs of the anti-war
movement picking up again within the United States?
D. J.: There does seem to be a bit of a movement
of people mobilizing with the upcoming anniversary of
the war, again, on March
19. A lot of people are organizing, working very
hard on counter-recruitment activism, as well as focusing
more on these corporations who have made so much off
the invasion and occupation of Iraq. It is slowly but
surely picking up steam, it seems like.
D. O'K: We recently saw a report that you spoke
at a meeting with former weapons inspector Scott Ritter,
where he asserted that Bush had already signed off on
plans to bomb Iran in June. What plans do you think
the United States has in terms of Iran, and also with
Syria?
D. J.: If we look at the actions of the Bush
administration, literally within days of the January
30 elections in Iraq they shifted their focus to Iran
and Syria, naming them specifically and using some of
the same rhetoric that was used in the lead-up to the
Iraq invasion, talking about weapons of mass destruction,
talking about nuclear weapons, talking about these tyrannical
states that needed to have this so-called U.S. democracy
imposed upon them.
Again, with what Mr.
Ritter said, I don't doubt his sources whatsoever
that these plans have already been signed off on for
U.S. mass aerial bombardment of Iran in June of this
year. With all of the rhetoric and these trips over
to Europe by members of the Bush administration to try
and build bridges and get people on board for this upcoming
action against Iran, everything seems to be pointing
in that direction.
D. O'K: Do you have plans to return to Iraq,
or perhaps to go to Iran, to continue providing on the
ground reports of the reality there?
D. J.: I maintain my focus on Iraq. I don't
have any plans to head into Iran. I do plan on going
back to Iraq, probably in May if all things hold right
now. |
BAGHDAD, March 4, 2005 (IslamOnline.net)
– The US-led occupation
of Iraq has played its toll on almost all aspects
of life. The change – whether for better or
worse is left for days and years to clarify –
is leading to an almost complete
reshaping of the political, economic, social and cultural
structure of the oil rich Arab country.
Unemployment is one of the
plagues. To get a job in Iraq, you need to learn a
foreign language, especially English, to know
how to deal with computers or to know how to "lead".
As a result, specialized centers are fast growing.
One can tell by the hundreds or even thousands of
newspapers ads or street signs promoting such centers.
Common among almost all job ads
is the condition of "fluent English". |
There's a bone in my
craw. It concerns the euphoria over the epidemic of democracy
in Iraq, Palestine, Ukraine, Lebanon . . .
The bone is called Haiti, perhaps you recall it? Island
not nearly as far away, where it should be far easier
to achieve noble ends than in distant, hostile regions.
Actual Canadian police officers involved, part of a
7,400-strong UN force. Paul Martin visited last fall
to show Canada's “long-term commitment to a strong
democracy.” One senior Haitian justice official
says a Canadian agency, CIDA, assigned him his post
and pays him.
A commander of a police unit from Quebec says what
he does in Haiti is “engage in daily guerrilla
warfare,” largely by giving “backup”
to Haitian police operations in what are routinely called
massacres. A month ago, The Globe and Mail's Marina
Jiménez wrote from there: “More than 200
people have died in street violence in the past three
months.”
Consider two recent stories. On February 19, “gunmen
stormed Haiti's main prison . . . and drove away with
jailed former prime minister Yvon Neptune” —
a supporter of former (elected) president Jean-Bertrand
Aristide, who was spirited off by the U.S. and flown
to Africa a year ago. As many as 500 of the 1,200 prisoners,
most of whom had never seen a judge, may also have escaped.
Witnesses said Yvon Neptune was forced into a car, but
he reached UN officials and demanded a return to the
(relative) safety of the prison, the site of earlier
attempts, he says, to murder him. Five days ago, on
the anniversary of the (latest) coup, Haitian police
fired on a march demanding Jean-Bertrand Aristide's
return, killing at least three protesters.
The connection to democracy? Well, in 1990, Jean-Bertrand
Aristide, a Canadian-educated priest who built a movement
working in the slums, won Haiti's first democratic election
with 67.5 per cent of the vote. The U.S.-backed candidate
came second with 14.2 per cent. It was called “a
textbook example of participatory, 'bottom up' and democratic
political development.”
He was overthrown by a U.S.-backed coup in 1991, then
reinstalled by U.S. troops in 1994 on condition he scrap
his equalizing social policies and implement a brutal
“austerity” agenda. He agreed but still
built more schools between 1994 and 2000 than had been
built between 1804 and 1994. He was re-elected in 2000
with 90 per cent of the vote. A year ago, he was whisked
off to Africa.
Why is this instructive? Because Haiti was not a case
where the U.S. had to impose democracy. It existed.
And the U.S. wiped it out, twice. At the least, does
it not raise the question: What is the U.S. motive elsewhere
when it says its goal is democratization? I won't speculate,
but don't you think it makes for an interesting discussion?
It's a question that also applies — still using
Haiti — to human rights, often cited as another
motive for U.S. intervention, as in Iraq or Kosovo.
A recent stunning (and sickening: it includes photos)
study by the University of Miami School of Law's Center
for the Study of Human Rights says, “Life for
the impoverished majority is becoming more violent and
more inhuman . . . since the elected government's removal.
. . . The police, backed by UN forces, routinely carry
out indiscriminate . . . killing operations . . . Prisons
fill with young men . . . denied due process. Partisanship
and corruption,” it concludes, linking rights
to democracy, “occupy the electoral council's
attention, leaving little hope for free and fair elections.”
The point is not that U.S. policy is opposed to democracy
and human rights. More that those constitute means,
rather than ends, which might be economic, military
or ideological. If democracy serves the ends, fine.
If not, screw democracy. You might even use democracy
to destroy democracy, depending on your other goals.
Democracy and human rights if necessary, but not necessarily
democracy and human rights.
By the way, I don't enjoy this role. Columnist Marcus
Gee gets to turn hand-springs in The Globe and Mail
on Wednesdays (“Admit it: Bush aids democracy”)
and Fridays I get to pout. I feel like the neighbour
who interrupts a great party to say, Um, some of the
cars parked outside are being tagged and towed. |
A few minutes, that
is how long our joy lasted. The time which goes from
a phone call to another: the one telling us of Giuliana’s
freedom and the one which throws us into the killing
of the person who more than anybody else worked to free
her. Fifteen, maximum twenty minutes, the time to save
one life and lose another. Within the absurdity of a
war in which we all risk to get lost.
Sure, we are happy to be able to soon hug Giuliana,
to be able to have her back with us, to go back and
listen to and read her stories of peace. We owe it to
what we have done in this very long month. All of us:
we of il manifesto, the colleagues who helped us keep
the attention on this abduction alive, the many people
who with a phone call, a letter, or by coming to the
streets kept the presence of our comrade alive even
while she was forced to be silent. But we also owe it
to those who worked night and day to find a contact
with the kidnappers, to reach an agreement. People who
are different from us, who speak a different language
and uses different means. Yet with some of them we have
been united with a common aim: to bring home a woman
deprived of her freedom and to do it though a negotiation,
not through those weapons which are the root of evil
which for thirty days has taken Giuliana away from us.
After those 15, 20 minutes of joy, last night we fell
into a live drama. We are journalists and we must tell
the story, but do not ask of us to be detached as a
reporter should be.
It is not possible. Just as it was not possible to
coldly separate the duty to report and comment from
the worry for Giuliana’s fate, from the fear she
had fear, she was hungry, cold. When that second phone
call arrived in a palace with high ceilings and wide
spaces - so different from our daily working place -,
we were there. And we will never be able to forget the
pain of the colleagues of Nicola Calipari, how Gianni
Letta was upset, even how the Prime Minister - whom
we saw there and then for the first time - could not
believe the news. We will never be able to forget the
hectic calls, the chaos, the feeling of being lost by
a place of power dealing with a power absolute and uncontrollable,
the power of was, of who makes it and directs it. «Nicola
died, Giuliana is wounded»: a bit crying, a bit
asking for more details of the wound of Giuliana, knowing
she was there, with the American guns pointing at her,
bleeding who knows how, asking she would be brought
immediately to the hospital. Then we heard the wound
was not serious, only superficial on the shoulder, because
the bullet which could have killed her had first gone
through the body of Nicola Calipari. Who saved her.
For the second time.
In those chaotic minutes, made of callls among ministries,
generals, ambassadors - calls which all seemed pointless
-- we witnessed impotence going on stage, the performance
of war killing politics, chalking democracy. All our
reasons - those of Giuliana - were confirmed. Yet we
wanted it to be different. We wish we could hear another
call, telling us it was all a mistake, nobody had died,
Nicola magically had got up, maybe a bit hurt and together
with our Giuliana he was going to the airport, to come
back home. We would have hug them both and all that
we had just witnessed would only have been a bad dream.
But no. That call never arrived. There has been another
one, confirming everything: Nicola died, Giuliana and
other two secret agents in the hospital. At that point,
the only thing left to do was to leave, go back to the
newspaper, tell everything to the comrades, explain
that the joy was lost.
They taught us to be cold, to analyze the events, not
to get involved too much, in order to understand what
happens. And try to change it. Right. But the world
is made of people. Facts, even history, are our product:
at the end they are the product of bodies, flesh and
blood. It all depends on us, on what we do. On what
Giuliana Sgrena has done and will don, on what Nicola
Calipari had done but will never be able to do. We got
a comrade back. We lost someone who would have become
our friend. |
We are happy for
the liberation of Giuliana Sgrena, we are waiting to
hug her here in via Tomacelli and we are above all dramatically
hurt for the killing of Nicola Calipari, who has been
the maker of Giuliana’s freedom. It would be bureaucratic
and a limit to write that Nicola Calipari was serving
the state. Nicola was a good person, loyal and generous.
I met Nicola Calipari only during Giuliana’s
kidnapping, when a young old friend, Guido Ruotolo,
gave me his name. Then Nicola himself got in touch more
intensly with Gabriele Polo, but I will never be able
to forget his discretion, his kindness, even while he
was smoking a cigarette or referring a conversation,
a contact. Discreet, respectful of his superior (who
thought of him greatly), but always careful to say what
was useful to solve the problem, I never heard him saying
something to show off, to earn the consensus of his
superiors. He was careful to the service, but also -
and I understood this recently, meeting him - to the
result, which coincided with his morality.
And he expressed this deep morality, that is respect
for himself and not only for others, through his modesty,
through his ability to never speak over the lines, through
the smile which often appeared on his lips. He was a
person that inspired the maximum trust even to myself
- consumed in so many experiences -: if Nicola told
me something, I believed him, I had no doubts nor suspects;
Nicola would not say something to hide something else.
And all of this was shown - to a careful eye - on his
face, on his smile, even on his mustache. And the eyes,
which were full of words and discreet. When at the check-point,
before the Baghdad airport, from and American car (yes,
American, Usa), the first shots were fired against the
car which was bringing Giuliana towards the airplane
which would have brought her back to Italy, Nicola reacted
humanly, immediately, for a reflex unwritten in the
rules of his service, he shielded Giuliana’s body,
and he was killed.
Last night Giuliana was in the hospital because she
was wounded in her shoulder, but she will come out of
the hospital and will come back here to Rome, in Via
Tomacelli. The joy for Giuliana is big, but even bigger
is our pain, of all of us of il manifesto, for the death
of Nicola Calipari. He was not wounded in service, but
because he has been extremely generous, which we of
il manifesto cannot forget. To his two children and
his wife a big hug from all, really all of us. |
Giuliana Sgrena, the
Italian journalist freed on Friday after a month in captivity
in Iraq, was recovering in a military hospital here after
taking shrapnel in her shoulder when American troops fired
300 to 400 shots into her car as it approached Baghdad
airport. She touched down in Rome yesterday morning and
was carried from the aeroplane wrapped in a blanket and
attached to a drip, looking haggard and exhausted.
The unprovoked attack killed Nicola Calipari, the Italian
military intelligence agent who had negotiated the journalist's
release. He had thrown himself on top of Ms Sgrena to
shield her and was killed by a bullet in the head. In
a brief conversation with the Italian Prime Minister,
Silvio Berlusconi, President Bush said he was sorry
about the incident and promised that it would be investigated.
The bizarre and bloody end to what should have been
a day of joyful celebration occurred at around 9pm as
the unmarked car with local plates carrying Ms Sgrena
and her liberators approached Baghdad airport. A plane
was waiting to take her home. But while the car was
still some 600 metres from the terminal, American troops
opened fire, unleashing a volley of 300 to 400 shots,
killing Mr Calipari outright and wounding Ms Sgrena
and the other two intelligence officers in the car,
one of them seriously.
The American State Department claimed the car had been
travelling at high speed. They said soldiers guarding
the approach to the airport had waved and flashed lights
ordering the car to pull over, then fired shots in the
air and finally shot out the engine block to force it
to stop. The statement failed to explain why the car's
passengers were peppered with bullets. And in her first
interview from hospital, Ms Sgrena said that the car
"was not travelling particularly fast, given the
circumstances".
She said that it was "while I was talking to Nicola
Calipari and he was relating to me all the phases of
the abduction, we were struck by a rain of fire".
Calipari had immediately hurled himself on top of her,
saving her life. The worst moment of the entire experience,
she said, was "the man who had freed me dying in
my arms". Piero Colari, Ms Sgrena's partner, told
reporters angrily: "There are only two explanations,
either it was an ambush or those soldiers were complete
idiots."
As with earlier Italian hostage cases in Iraq, Mr Berlusconi
had taken a close personal interest in the freeing of
Ms Sgrena, who was abducted on 4 February by gunmen
outside Baghdad University. The episode saw the anti-communist
crusader collaborating intimately with the unreconstructed
leftists of Il Manifesto, her newspaper.
Mr Berlusconi was evidently enraged by what happened.
He summoned the American ambassador, Mel Sembler, who
arrived at his official residence, Palazzo Chigi, at
11pm and stayed for an hour. Mr Berlusconi said, "somebody
must take responsibility for what has happened".
At the White House, a spokesman said the origin of
the incident lay in "a lack of co-ordination"
between the Italians and the Americans. It was said
that the Americans were not informed about the progress
of negotiations with the hostage-takers, and were not
aware that Ms Sgrena had been freed.
Analysts said that the debacle was unlikely to force
a change in Mr Berlusconi's support for the occupation.
Italy has 2,700 "peacekeepers" committed to
Iraq, the second largest non-American force after the
British. |
ROME (Reuters) -
Italian hostage Giuliana Sgrena, shot and wounded after
being freed in Iraq, said Sunday U.S. forces may have
deliberately targeted her because Washington opposed
Italy's policy of dealing with kidnappers.
She offered no evidence for her claim, but the sentiment
reflected growing anger in Italy over the conduct of
the war, which has claimed more than 20 Italian lives,
including the secret agent who rescued her moments before
being killed.
Friday evening's killing of the agent and wounding
of the journalist, who worked for a communist daily,
has sparked tension with Italy's U.S. allies and put
pressure on Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi to take
a hard line with President Bush.
The United States has promised a full investigation
into incident, in which soldiers fired on the Italians'
car as it approached Baghdad airport Friday evening.
The U.S. military says the car was speeding toward
a checkpoint and ignored warning shots, an explanation
denied by government ministers and the driver of the
car.
Speaking from her hospital bed where she is being treated,
Sgrena told Sky Italia TV it was possible the soldiers
had targeted her because Washington opposes Italy's
dealings with kidnappers that may include ransom payments.
"The United States doesn't approve of this (ransom)
policy and so they try to stop it in any way possible."
According to Italy's leading daily Corriere della Sera,
the driver, an unidentified Italian agent, said: "We
were driving slowly, about 40-50 km/h (25-30 mph)."
In a harrowing account of her ordeal, Sgrena wrote
in Sunday's Il Manifesto newspaper that the secret agent,
Nicola Calipari, saved her life by shielding her with
his body.
"Nicola threw himself on to protect me and then
suddenly I heard his last breath as he died on top of
me," she wrote. |
Rome - The Italian journalist
wounded by US troops shortly after her month-long kidnap
ordeal ended this weekend, on Sunday fanned a growing
diplomatic rift between Rome and Washington by suggesting
the US soldiers deliberately tried to kill her.
Giuliana Sgrena, wounded when the convoy taking her
to safety was riddled with bullets by a US patrol near
Baghdad airport on Friday, said she may have been a
target because the US opposed negotiations with her
kidnappers.
"Everyone knows that the Americans don't want
hostages to be freed by negotiations, and for that reason,
I don't see why I should rule out that I was their target,"
Sgrena told Sky Italia news channel on Sunday.
The comment comes amid fears that Friday's incident,
in which Italy's top intelligence officer in Iraq was
killed, could lead to a full-scale diplomatic rift between
the two allies.
"The incident could have very
serious political consequences," Italy's La Stampa
daily said in a front page editorial.
"The state of relations between
the two governments, Italy and the United States, has
suffered an immediate deterioration.
"Hour after hour, Washington's
version given by the state department immediately after
the incident has begun to unravel.
"The theory that an absence of
coordination in Baghdad between the two allied commands
and excessive secrecy by the Italians about their (rescue)
mission led to the shooting near the airport, has faded."
Delicate operation
"The Italian government said
it had informed the United States about the very delicate
operation which was about to begin.
"And the presence of an American
colonel at Baghdad airport along with the Italian officers
who were waiting for Sgrena and her liberators, demonstrates
that the operation was being conducted in harmony,"
the newspaper said.
It said however that a ranson was "almost certainly"
paid to the kidnappers, even though any payment was
"very probably" opposed by the Americans.
Sgrena, a 56-year-old correspondent for the Italian
communist daily Il Manifesto, confirmed on Sunday that
she had been voluntarily released by her kidnappers.
With most attention on the dramatic aftermath, little
has been said about the circumstances of her actual
release. Sgrena's account in her newspaper made it clear
however that no force was involved, and that her kidnappers
drove her to an obviously pre-arranged handover point.
Washington has pledged a full inquiry into the incident
and President George W. Bush has personally expressed
his regret over what happened.
The body of the dead intelligence officer, Nicola Calipari,
has been repatriated to Rome and was to lie in state
at the Vittoriano national monument on Sunday before
a state funeral on Monday.
The US military said their forces had given ample warning
to the driver of Sgrena's car, which they said was approaching
at speed when they opened fire, but that has been flatly
contradicted by Sgrena. |
Shattered
bridges |
Is there more to the abduction
of Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena than meets the eye?
Samia Nkrumah, in Rome, reports |
[...] Not surprisingly,
Sgrena's present predicament has attracted the widest
support from Italians who came out in various protests
and marches since her capture, culminating in last week's
half-a-million silent protest in the capital Rome. The
march came on the heels of parliament's recent vote to
keep troops in Iraq and was attended by the main opposition
leaders including Romano Prodi as well as many leading
Catholic figures.
So far those efforts have not born fruit and the nagging
question about who benefits from terrorising foreign
pacifists continues.
With so little information at hand, no one is saying
that the Iraqi secret service is behind the latest kidnapping,
but the nagging question as to who benefits from terrorising
anti- occupation civilians persists.
Two recent developments are worth noting. Earlier in
the year, Newsweek reported that the Pentagon is considering
using the "Salvador Option" in reference to
a counter-insurgency strategy of the 1980s which saw
the CIA-train local secret forces to go after leftists
insurgents and their sympathisers in the Central American
country and which led to tens of thousands of deaths.
A few weeks ago, and of particular interest to Italy,
researcher Daniele Ganser with the Centre for Security
Studies at the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich
published a book on the NATO's Secret Armies after WWII.
The research offers plenty of proof on how NATO and
the secret services in various European countries collaborated
in attacks on civilians that were blamed on left-wing
groups. It was not till the early 1990s that a former
Italian prime minister, Giulio Andreotti confirmed that
the secret group, code- named Gladio, existed.
Ganser's book contains various documented confessions
including this chilling statement by former Gladio member,
a right-wing extremist who was convicted for his part
in one fatal attack, "You had to attack civilians,
people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people
far removed from any political game. The reason was
quite simple. They were supposed to force these people,
the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for
greater security." |
The Italian journalist who was
wounded by American troops in Baghdad shortly after
she was released by her Iraqi captors denied US allegations
that the car she was in was speeding, and described
how the agent who had rescued her died protecting
her.
"I remember only fire," Giuliana Sgrena
wrote in her newspaper, the communist daily Il Manifesto.
"At that point a rain of fire and bullets came
at us, forever silencing the happy voices from a few
minutes earlier."
Sgrena was wounded and Italian intelligence officer
Nicola Calipari was killed as they celebrated her
freedom on the way to the airport.
The shooting on Friday has fuelled anti-American
sentiment in a country where people are deeply opposed
to the war in Iraq.
Sgrena’s newspaper, Il Manifesto, has been
a fierce opponent of the war and of Italian Premier
Silvio Berlusconi’s decision to send 3,000 troops.
Sgrena said the driver began shouting that they were
Italian, then "Nicola Calipari dove on top of
me to protect me and immediately, and I mean immediately,
I felt his last breath as he died on me."
Suddenly, she said, she remembered
her captors’ words, when they warned her "to
be careful because the Americans don’t want
you to return".
The US military said the Americans used hand and
arm signals, flashing white lights and fired warning
shots to get the car to stop. But in an interview
with Italian La 7 TV, Sgrena said "there
was no bright light, no signal". [...]
In her article, Sgrena wrote that
her captors warned her as she was about to be released
not to signal her presence to anyone, because "the
Americans might intervene".
"What happened yesterday
in Baghdad was a homicide," Polo told
Apcom.
"The Americans must be firmly reminded to respect
human and civil rules," ANSA quoted Mirko Tremaglia,
minister for Italians abroad, as saying. |
BEIJING, Mar. 6 -- The
US intelligence analysts say Jordanian terror mastermind
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and al Qaida's leader Osama bin Laden
are still independent operators, rather than allies.
A Washington Post report Saturday quoted senior US
intelligence officials as saying that Zarqawi and bin
Laden talked months ago about bin Laden's suggestion
that Zarqawi should consider initiating possible attacks
inside the United States.
US intelligence officials have been analyzing the
latest communications between Zarqawi and bin Laden
and previously intercepted messages, saying that Zarqawi
may be a partner of bin Laden or a competitor, but it
is not like they are close and in a binding relationship.
The latest bin Laden-Zarqawi exchange became public
after the US Homeland Security Department sent a bulletin,
classified as "secret" to homeland security
directors across the country last weekend. |
Iraqi sources have told
a Saudi newspaper that al-Qaeda's man in Iraq, Abu Musab
al-Zarqawi, has been arrested. Al Watan daily said Sunday
that the official announcement on the arrest was delayed
until a new Iraqi government is in place. The purported
arrest supposedly took place on the Iraqi - Syrian border,
the report added. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
It should be mentioned that CNN aired on Saturday new
pictures believed to show al-Zarqawi, who is America's
most-wanted man in Iraq.
The Saudi paper said that the arrest of al-Zarqawi
was completed ahead the recent visit of US Defence Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld in Iraq. This visit took place early
February. |
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration's
secret program to transfer suspected terrorists to
foreign countries for interrogation has been carried
out by the Central Intelligence Agency under broad
authority that has allowed it to act without
case-by-case approval from the White House or the
State or Justice Departments, according to
current and former government officials.
The unusually expansive authority
for the C.I.A. to operate independently was provided
by the White House under a still-classified directive
signed by President Bush within days of the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks at the World Trade Center and the
Pentagon, the officials said.
The process, known as rendition, has been central
in the government's efforts to disrupt terrorism,
but has been bitterly criticized by human rights groups
on grounds that the practice has violated the Bush
administration's public pledge to provide safeguards
against torture.
In providing a detailed description of the program,
a senior United States official said that it had been
aimed only at those suspected of knowing about terrorist
operations, and emphasized
that the C.I.A. had gone to great lengths to ensure
that they were detained under humane conditions and
not tortured.
The official would not discuss any legal directive
under which the agency operated, but said that the
"C.I.A. has existing authorities to lawfully
conduct these operations."
The official declined to be named but agreed to discuss
the program to rebut the assertions that the United
States used the program to secretly send people to
other countries for the purpose of torture. The
transfers were portrayed as an alternative to what
American officials have said is the costly, manpower-intensive
process of housing them in the United States or in
American-run facilities in other countries.
In recent weeks, several former detainees have described
being subjected to coercive interrogation techniques
and brutal treatment during months spent in detention
under the program in Egypt and other countries. The
official would not discuss specific cases, but did
not dispute that there had been instances in which
prisoners were mistreated. The
official said none had died.
The official said the C.I.A.'s inspector general
was reviewing the rendition program as one of at least
a half-dozen inquiries within the agency of possible
misconduct involving the detention, interrogation
and rendition of suspected terrorists.
In public, the Bush administration has refused to
confirm that the rendition program exists, saying
only in response to questions about it that the United
States did not hand over people to face torture. The
official refused to say how many prisoners had been
transferred as part of the program. But
former government officials say that since the Sept.
11 attacks, the C.I.A. has flown 100 to 150 suspected
terrorists from one foreign country to another, including
to Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Pakistan.
Each of those countries has
been identified by the State Department as habitually
using torture in its prisons. But the official
said that guidelines enforced within the C.I.A. require
that no transfer take place before the receiving country
provides assurances that the prisoner will be treated
humanely, and that United States personnel are assigned
to monitor compliance. [...] |
An Army intelligence sergeant
who accused fellow soldiers in Samarra, Iraq, of abusing
detainees in 2003 was in turn
accused by his commander of being delusional and ordered
to undergo a psychiatric evaluation in Germany,
despite a military psychiatrist's initial judgment
that the man was stable, according to internal Army
records released yesterday.
The soldier had angered his
commander by urging the unit's redeployment from the
military base to prevent what the soldier feared would
be the death of one or more detainees under interrogation,
according to the documents. He told his commander
three members of the counterintelligence team had
hit detainees, pulled their hair, tried to asphyxiate
them and staged mock executions with pistols pointed
at the detainees' heads. [...]
These cases were among 13 described in more than
1,000 pages of Army criminal records released at the
Pentagon under the order of a New York federal judge.
They detail the Army's investigations of other allegations
by U.S. military personnel in Iraq of abuse, rape
and larceny by fellow soldiers. [...] |
COLLEGE STATION, Texas -- The
Bush administration has adopted a new counterintelligence
strategy that calls for "attacking" foreign
spy services and the spy components of terrorist groups
before they can strike, a senior U.S. intelligence
official said yesterday.
National Counterintelligence Executive Michelle Van
Cleave said in a speech here that the past policy
of waiting for intelligence threats to emerge "ceded
the initiative to the adversary."
"No longer will we wait
until taking action," Miss Van Cleave said during
a conference hosted by the Bush School of Government
and Public Service at Texas A&M University.
"To meet the threat, U.S.
counterintelligence needs to go on the offensive,
which will require major but achievable changes in
the way we do business."
The new mission for counterintelligence is to identify
foreign spies and terrorist threats, and then develop
"a counterintelligence doctrine of attacking
foreign intelligence services systematically via strategic
counterintelligence operations," Miss Van Cleave
said.
The offensive counterintelligence
strategy is part of the Bush administration's policy
of pre-empting strategic threats. It is also
part of President Bush's announced plan to promote
democracy and freedom and undermine global tyranny,
she said.
In the past, counterintelligence often was limited
to "catching spies." Previously captured
spies, including CIA turncoat Aldrich Ames and Robert
Hanssen, a Russian mole in the FBI, "caused stunning
losses," Miss Van Cleave said.
In the battle against terrorists,
new counterintelligence activities will target the
intelligence services of state sponsors of terrorism,
such as Syria and Iran. [...]
Miss Van Cleave's comments came as FBI and CIA officials
at the conference said the threat from foreign intelligence
services -- specifically, Russia and China -- is growing.
Barry Royden, a veteran CIA official, said Russian
intelligence services are targeting U.S. troops in
the Middle East for recruitment as agents, as well
as seeking recruits among Americans in Russia.
Russian intelligence officers
are using "very aggressive actions and operations,"
including blackmail, extortion and entrapment "to
try to get people to commit espionage," Mr. Royden
said.
He also said the Russians are conducting "very
aggressive operations against our troops in the Middle
East." He did not elaborate.
"We get continued reporting about very aggressive
actions and operations against Americans of all types
and stripes" in Russia and other parts of the
world, Mr. Royden said.
Tim Bereznay, a senior FBI counterintelligence
official, said Chinese intelligence activities are
a major threat -- specifically, Beijing's covert targeting
of U.S. weapons technology.
Counterintelligence against
Chinese spying "is our main priority," Mr.
Bereznay. [...] |
China's influence on the world
is seen as positive by more people than is the case
for the US or Russia, according to a new BBC World
Service poll.
In total, 48% of people polled
in 22 countries said China's role was mainly positive.
Only 30% saw it as mainly negative.
The majority of respondents were also positive about
the communist nation's growing economic power.
But far fewer people wanted to see an increase in
its military might.
Even in neighbouring Asian countries,
which have historically been suspicious of China's
dominance, opinions were relatively benign.
An exception was Japan, where only 22% of people
polled said China had a mainly positive influence.
[...] |
TEHRAN: An Iranian
official charged with hunting for three Iranian diplomats
and a reporter who went missing in Lebanon more than
two decades ago has said he believes they could still
be alive and in an Israeli jail, the student news agency
ISNA said Friday.
"According to our latest information, the four
Iranians have been seen in the Zionist regime's jails.
If it is said they have been martyred, it is only to
cover up the Zionist regime involvement in this issue,"
said Raed Mousavi, a member of an official follow-up
committee charged with the case.
He said the information that the four had been transferred
to Israel came from someone released in a prisoner exchange
between Israel and the Iranian-backed Hizbullah movement.
"He had seen the four diplomats in Israeli prisons
in 1988," said the official, who is also the father
of one of the missing men.
He added he believed Israel may have hoped to exchange
them for missing Israeli airman Ron Arad. The four Iranians
disappeared in northern Lebanon in July 1982.
Iran has stepped up its search for news on their fate
after hundreds of Palestinians and Arab prisoners were
freed in exchange for an Israeli businessman and the
bodies of three soldiers in January 2004.
The second phase of the Hizbullah-Israel exchange arrangement
reportedly involves seeking news on Arad - missing since
his aircraft was shot down over Lebanon in 1986 - as
well as the four Iranians and missing Lebanese.
Hizbullah believes the Iranians may have been handed
over to Israel by a Lebanese Christian militia after
their arrest in 1982.
There have also been allegations that Arad is alive
and was transferred to Iran, something the Islamic republic
has repeatedly denied. |
NEW DELHI Mar 5, 2005
— Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Saturday
that the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries
could fix a price for oil in the range of $40 to $50 per
barrel, adding that low petroleum prices were a thing
of the past.
Chavez's comments came ahead of a crucial OPEC meeting
in Iran on March 16. Some analysts are expecting the
cartel to cut production to boost oil prices, which
have skyrocketed over the past year on supply worries.
Venezuela, the world's fifth-largest oil exporter,
has been consistently pushing for higher oil prices.
Venezuela produces more than 3 million barrels of crude
oil a day.
"The OPEC could fix the price at between $40 to
$50 per barrel," Chavez told reporters in New Delhi.
"The world should forget about cheap oil. It will
never go back to the $10 per barrel rate that prevailed
in those days," he added, without elaborating.
Crude oil futures traded above $53 a barrel again on
Friday.
Chavez, who is on a four-day state visit to India,
held talks earlier Saturday with Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh, during which the two countries agreed to cooperate
in the energy, biotechnology, space and railroad sectors.
Chavez later flew to Calcutta, where he said he was
considering increasing oil trade with countries like
India and China to ensure their fast economic growth.
"Venezuela will now help the Southern
Hemisphere countries with its oil more than it has helped
the United States," he said. "America wants
to keep all the good things in the world for itself.
But we will not let them do it."
Relations between the United States and Venezuela have
deteriorated steadily since Chavez took office in February
1999. He has repeatedly accused Washington of trying
to destabilize his government. The State Department
has rejected the allegation. |
An earthquake in the
Charlevoix area of Quebec was felt in parts of Orleans
and Gatineau this morning.
Natural Resources Canada says the epicentre of the
5.4 magnitude earthquake was near Riviere-du-Loup on
the St. Lawrence River.
Ottawa Police and a number of callers tell CFRA News
they felt the tremor around 1:20 this morning.
The quake was felt from Ottawa through southern Quebec
and into New Brunswick.
Ottawa is located 550-kilometres from the epicentre.
A spokesperson for Natural Resources Canada says it
was the largest quake in Quebec since 1959. Quakes are
common in the Charlevoix area.
There are no reports of any damage. |
Two strong and nearly simultaneous
earthquakes measuring 5.9 on the Richter scale rocked
high-rise buildings in Taiwan, injuring two people,
officials said.
The first quake struck at 3:06 am (1906 GMT Saturday)
with its epicenter 6.2 kilometers (3.7 miles) north
of the eastern coastal town of Suao and 8.5 kilometers
underground, the Seismology Center said after revising
its earlier readings.
Before residents had recovered from the initial shock,
another quake of the same magnitude rattled the island
a minute later. As the two quakes nearly overlapped,
seismologists had not noticed the second in their
initial reports.
"In Taiwan's earthquake
history, it was rare to have two major quakes of equal
strength hit the same area in a very short period
of time," Lu Pei-ling, deputy chief of the Seismology
Center, told reporters. [...]
A tremor with a magnitude of 4.2 struck seven minutes
before the two stronger quakes. At least 100 aftershocks
were reported, and seismologists warned of more strong
quakes in the next few weeks. [...] |
A strong earthquake occurred
at 05:21:43 (UTC) on Sunday, March 6, 2005. The magnitude
6.3 event has been located NORTH OF SEVERNAYA ZEMLYA.
(This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)
|
Summary - (Mar 4,
2005) Scientists are fairly certain that the Earth went
through a snowball glaciation 600-800 million years
ago, when the entire planet was locked in snow and ice.
One new theory to explain this extreme cooling is the
possibility that the Solar System passed through an
interstellar cloud of dust and gas, which obscured the
light from the Sun. Even if the cloud wasn't thick enough
to obscure light from the Sun, it could have enabled
charged particles to pass into the Earth's atmosphere
and destroy the ozone layer. These clouds are huge,
and it would take the Solar System 500,000 years to
pass through one. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|