Article - 911 Eye-witnesses
Article - High Strangeness
Article - The Blair Belief Project
Strike Flash Presentation by a QFS member
Tale & Pictures of the Day
by a Survivor
here is my story:
upon a time a Brother from Outer Space came down to Earth in a rainy
Pyrenean forest to shed his 4th Density light upon Mankind. A member
of a local tribe was the first to greet the Space Brother. The Space
Brother told the tribesman that he had been sent by the Great Council
of the Stars to save mankind from themselves. The Great Council,
in their cosmic wisdom, had seen that things were getting out of
hand on this planet, and no matter their attempts to intervene on
the Astral Planes, humanity just wasn't receiving the message.
Light Workers were needed!
turned immediately into a Cult, as it can be seen in this image
from the forthcoming documentary, Many Hams Make Light Workers:
by his message of peace, and overcome by the Rays of Magnificence
given off by his Imperial Being, humans offered him devotion, naked
women and bottles of French Wine ...
of course the Space Brother loved that:
Brother secretly thought that the Wine should help him to get a
Deep Male Voice. The blur on the picture is caused by this intense
4th D thinking.
the same time, a Shaman was living in the deepest and darkest part
of the Tall Pine Forest:
man of vast knowledge (who spoke in Gaelic!!) became furious because
he was no longer the object of the Tribal Cult. He had to come up
with a plan in order to win back the attentions of the Forest Tribe.
decided to create a giant bow to send a giant arrow into Outer Space
to kill 'em all (talking about the Space Brothers, of course)(Sorry
it's hard to translate Gaelic gurglings):
Shaman, at the nadir of his influence over the Tribe, tries to carry
a giant arrow on his shoulder in order to bushwhack the Space Brother.
Dark STS forces are powerfully emanating from his body as he's closer
and closer to achieve his revenge!
will happen next ?
the Wise One, the Glove Eater, save the Space Brother?
Or will he succomb to the powerful magic of the Shaman?
get the answer next week !!
| The US has
warned its citizens in Nordic and Baltic states of the threat of imminent
In a statement posted on the Finnish embassy website,
the state department warns citizens to be vigilant, especially when
using public transport.
A statement on the Latvian embassy website warns citizens to avoid
crowded areas and transport hubs from Monday.
They do not provide further details or say whether the threat is
linked to Tuesday's US presidential elections.
"The US Department of State wishes to alert US citizens, either
resident in or travelling through the Nordic/Baltic region, that
it has received threat information," says the statement on
the Helsinki embassy website.
It warns all citizens to "be vigilant as to their surroundings,
especially in centres of ground-based mass transit, and to report
any unusual or suspicious persons, incidents or circumstances to
the nearest police authorities."
The statement on the Riga embassy website adds that "citizens
are urged to avoid large shopping areas and transportation hubs
on or about 1 November".
No further details are available at present.
The Nordic countries comprise Sweden,
Finland, Denmark, Norway and Iceland.
The Baltic states are Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.
KUWAT CITY, November 01 (Online):
Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is living
in a safe place northeast of the Afghan capital under the protection
of a tribe, Kuwait's Al-Rai Al-Aam newspaper quoted Islamic sources
as saying Saturday.
An unnamed person met Omar two weeks ago and also saw bin Laden
some two and a half months ago and told the sources the Al Qaeda
leader was in good spirits.
"Sheikh Abu Abdullah (bin Laden) is in good health and high
morale. He lives along with four people in a safe place with an
Afghan tribe that provides him with all means of comfort and safety,"
the sources quoted the man as saying.
"Sheikh Osama lives in an area northeast of Kabul and closely
follows the military actions of his followers," he added.
Bin Laden's number two Ayman al-Zawahiri also lives in Afghanistan
but in an area far away from where the Al Qaeda leader is hiding,
the sources said. The two leaders exchange information and coordinate
through well-trusted men.
Both the Taleban and Al Qaeda are currently "regrouping"
in preparation to launch "qualitative" attacks against
US forces in Afghanistan, the sources added.
Al Qaeda is not capable at present of carrying
out military attacks in Iraq, disputing statements by interim Prime
Minister Iyad Allawi that bin Laden had sent one of his followers
to command operations in Iraq, the sources said.
Bin Laden threatened the United States with attacks similar to
September 11, 2001 and accused President George W. Bush of "misleading"
his people, in a video message aired Friday just days ahead of the
US presidential election.
NEW YORK There's good news from
Afghanistan. President George W. Bush boasts that freedom is on
the march. He showcases the presidential elections of Oct. 9, in
which millions voted. Hamid Karzai is headed for a clear victory.
The Taliban and Al Qaeda were unable even to disrupt, let alone
halt, this election. The inevitable irregularities and disputes
should not detract from this success.
Unfortunately, there is also bad news from Afghanistan.
The CIA had been scheduled to release a report on drugs in Afghanistan
last Friday. But the Los Angeles Times reported on Oct. 4 that the
CIA estimated that the land planted in opium in Afghanistan had
increased 60 percent over the previous year. And last year, according
to the United Nations, income from opium growing and trafficking
was equal to more than half of the legal economy of Afghanistan.
So the administration decided that Friday afternoon was not a deep
enough well to drown this report in and postponed its release until
late November, according to a Pentagon source.
The Bush administration's decision to arm and
fund commanders with long histories of involvement in drug trafficking,
and its failure for almost three years to do anything about it,
has greatly exacerbated this problem. When he visits Afghanistan,
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld meets military commanders whom
Afghans know as the godfathers of drug trafficking. The message
has been clear: Help fight the Taliban and no one will interfere
with your trafficking.
Drugs have become the key political and economic issue. Antonio
Maria Costa, executive director of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime,
told The Boston Globe, "Just as people can be addicted to drugs,
countries can be addicted to a drug economy. That's what I am seeing
Drugs provide livelihoods for poor farmers as well as employment
for laborers during the harvest. Teachers and bureaucrats earn extra
money as small-time traders. Merchants and money lenders earn profits
as financiers and middlemen. Militia commanders, including members
of Karzai's cabinet and the commanders of the country's principal
military garrisons, have enriched themselves protecting the trade.
Every time Rumsfeld goes to Kabul, he exudes enthusiasm over the
revival of commerce and construction. He notices all the new vehicles
in the streets. Just what does he think is financing most of that
investment and imports? The $3.3 billion of international aid disbursed
on active projects since January 2002, or the $7 billion in opium
revenues over the same period of time?
No government can establish security or the rule
of law under these circumstances. [...]
If foreigners destroy half of their economy without offering an
alternative, without any meaningful consultation, what, then, will
the Afghans think of the elections? Will they feel they are living
in an emerging democracy?
Afghans will work to eliminate drugs if America develops, with
the Afghan government, a long-term program that balances law enforcement
against traffickers and warlords with a major effort to transform
rather than destroy the Afghan economy.
I don't want anyone to panic.
Let's all remain calm as we talk about rocks that can fall from
space anytime, anywhere and without warning.
We probably should begin our discussion today by defining some
* Asteroids -- minor planets in our solar system, ranging in size
from a small chunk to more than 1,000 kilometers across. They are
irregular in shape and most orbit the sun in a belt between Mars
* Meteoroids -- small, almost grainy rocks that orbit the sun,
most weighing just a few grams. Most are leftover debris from comets
or the result of asteroid collisions.
* Meteor -- a piece of rock or dust that has entered Earth's atmosphere
and is in the process of burning up, creating a bright flash in
the sky. A meteor is sometimes called a "shooting star."
* Meteorite -- a meteor that survived the trip through our atmosphere
and has struck the surface.
Meteorites leave an impression on our planet. Perhaps the most
famous is the Barringer Crater in Arizona, formed when a meteorite
measuring 50 meters across struck Earth 50,000 years ago. This crater
is 1.2 kilometers across and 200 meters deep.
Some collisions are more drastic. In the 1970s, geological dating
determined that iridium-rich clay found in a layer between limestone
strata all over the world was 65 million years old. That date coincides
with a time when more than two-thirds of the species, including
the dinosaurs, suddenly became extinct.
The connection? At the end of the Mesozoic
era, a meteorite approximately 10 kilometers in diameter struck
Earth, ejecting enough dust (including iridium) into the atmosphere
to block the sun for several years, causing decreasing temperatures
and mass extinctions.
Without the dinosaurs, the stage was set for mammals to develop
and thrive in the Cenozoic era. Very humbling, in retrospect: If
not for the extinction of the dinosaurs, would we mammals ever have
risen to our present dominance?
Evidence now shows that our world experienced several
large impacts in the past that have severely altered the biological
landscape of this planet.
You might think that since these impacts can be so destructive,
there would be millions of dollars and thousands of professionals
Nope. There is only a handful of professional "asteroid hunters"
working with limited resources. And it's a very big sky to search.
Now, you're saying, "Tom, I hear you. But, hey, aren't the
odds of us being hit so low that we shouldn't worry about it?"
Perhaps. And, yes, the number of collisions has decreased dramatically
over Earth's 5 billion-year history. But before we relax, let's
consider the following three anecdotes.
* On Nov. 30, 1954, Mrs. E. Hulitt Hodge was taking a nap on her
couch. A meteorite burst through her ceiling, ricocheted off her
radio, and bore its way through two heavy quilts before penetrating
her hip. She was severely injured but survived. The meteorite is
now in a permanent collection at the Smithsonian.
* A fireball appeared in the skies over Illinois, Indiana, Michigan
and Missouri on March 26, 2003. Soon after, the peaceful town of
Park Forest, Ill., was subjected to a massive meteorite shower when
a meteor, as heavy as 7,000 kilograms, broke apart in the atmosphere.
No injuries were reported, but insurance representatives were overworked
with damaged houses, cars and businesses. Even the fire department
was not spared as a 545-gram meteorite tore though the firehouse.
* On Sept. 29, 2004, an asteroid called Toutatis, 4.5 kilometers
across, came within 1.5 million kilometers of earth. This is only
four times the distance from the earth to the moon. While Toutatis'
orbit is such that it will not strike Earth, it does serve to remind
us that the celestial coast is not clear and that the threat of
large-scale impacts is still very real.
Have a nice day. Don't forget your umbrella.
| Early results from Ukraine suggest
the Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych is leading in the presidential
poll by a narrow margin.
With more than 80% of the vote counted, Mr Yanukovych is ahead
of opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko by 42% to 37%. [...]
The elections are being closely watched by both Russia, which backs
Mr Yanukovych, and the US, which has complained about a "deeply
Everybody in Israel is talking about the Next
War. The most popular TV channel is running a whole series about
Not another war with the Arabs. Not the nuclear threat from Iran.
Not the ongoing bloody confrontation with the Palestinians. The
talk is about the coming civil war.
Only a few months ago, that would have sounded preposterous. Now,
suddenly, is has become a possibility, and a very real one. Not
another blown-up media sensation. Not yet another of Sharon’s
political manipulations. Not just a new blackmail attempt by the
settlers, but the real thing, in the flesh.
They talk about it at cabinet meetings and in the Knesset, on
TV talk-shows, in editorials and the news pages. The Chief-of-Staff
has publicly warned that the army may fall apart. One of the ministers
says that the very existence of the State of Israel is in danger.
Another minister prophesies a bloodbath like the Spanish civil war.
Quietly and not so quietly, the Shin Bet is taking precautions.
The prison service has been ordered to prepare facilities for mass
detentions. The army leadership is planning the call-up of 10 thousand
reserve soldiers and starting to think about the steps they must
take in the case of…
No, it’s a very real threat. On the face of it, it may seem
to have appeared from nowhere. But whoever has eyes to see knew
that it is going to happen, sooner or later.
The seeds of the civil war were sown when the first settlement
was put up in the occupied territories. At the time, I told the
Prime Minister in the Knesset: “You are laying a land mine.
Some day you will have to dismantle it. As a former soldier, let
me warn you that the dismantling of land mines is a very unpleasant
job.” Since then, hundreds of mines have been laid. The minefields
are being extended even now.
The process has been led by religious fundamentalists.
Their declared aim, as they said then and never tire of repeating,
is to drive all the Arabs out of the country that God promised us.
And the land God promised us, as one of them reminded us on TV the
other day, is not the “Palestine”
of the British mandate, but the Promised Land - including Jordan,
Lebanon and parts of Syria and Sinai. Quoting the Bible,
another one declared that we have come to this country not only
to inherit, but also to disinherit the others, to drive them out
and take their place.
Since the then Minister of Defence, Shimon Peres, implanted the
first settlement, Kedumim, in the middle of the Palestinian population
on the West Bank, the settlements have spread like locusts. Every
settlement has gradually stolen the lands and water of the neighboring
Palestinian villages, uprooted their trees, blocked their roads
and built new roads, barred to Palestinians. Almost all the settlements
have spawned satellite outposts on the nearby hills.
This has never ceased, even after Sharon solemnly promised President
Bush to dismantle the “outposts”. On the contrary, since
then dozens of new one have sprung up, and not one has been dismantled.
A recently published finding by the State Comptroller details how
several government ministries actively and knowingly subverted the
law in order to ensure continued clandestine government funding
for settlement activities.
When we warned of the danger, we were told to relax. Only a small
minority of the settlers, we were comforted, are fanatical kooks.
These are indeed crazy and will forcibly resist any attempt to remove
them. But that will not be a big problem, because the vast majority
of Israeli citizens detest them and consider them nuttier than fruitcakes.
Most of the settlers, we were told, are not fanatics. They went
there because the government presented them with expensive villas,
which they could not even dream about in Israel proper. They were
looking for “quality of life”. When the government tells
them to move, they will take the compensation and move on.
This was a dangerous delusion. As Karl Marx observed, people’s
consciousness is determined by their situation. The good Laborites
who were implanted by the Labor government on the West Bank and
in the Gaza Strip now talk and behave like the worst followers of
the late fascist rabbi Meir Kahane.
Moreover, we were told, even the weirdos recognize Israeli democracy.
Nobody will raise his hands against soldiers of the Israeli army.
When the government and the Knesset decide to evacuate settlements,
they will obey. They may raise a ruckus and put up a show of resistance,
as they did during the evacuation of the North Sinai settlements
in 1982, but at the end of the day they will give in. After all,
even in North Sinai not one single settler refused, in the end,
to accept their compensation.
But this disdain for the settlers is no less dangerous than the
disdain for the Arabs. What had been hidden
all the time is now becoming clear: the settlers don’t give
a damn for democracy and the institutions of the state. Their hard
core spells it out: when the resolutions of the Knesset contradict
the Halakha (Jewish religious law), the Halakha has priority. After
all, the Knesset is just a gang of corrupt politicians. And what
value have the secular laws, copied from the Goyim (Gentiles), compared
to the word of God, blessed be his name?
Many settlers do not yet say so openly and pretend to be insulted
when such attitudes are attributed to them, but in fact they are
dragged along by the hard core that has already thrown off all the
masks. They challenge not only the policy of the government, but
Israeli democracy as such. They declare openly that their aim is
to transform Israel from a democratic republic into a Halakhic one.
A State of Law is subject to the will of the majority, which enacts
the laws and amends them as necessary. The
State of the Halakha is subject to the Torah, revealed once and
for all on Mount Sinai and unchangeable. Only a very small number
of eminent rabbis have the authority to interpret the Halakha. That
is, of course, the opposite of democracy. In any other country,
these people would be called fascists. The religious coloration
makes no difference.
The religious-rightist rebels are powerfully motivated. Many of
them believe in most xenophobic interpretations of the Kabbala,
which, state that secular Jews are really Amalekites who succeeded
in infiltrating the People of Israel at the time of the exodus from
Egypt. God Himself has commanded, as everyone knows, the eradication
of Amalek from the face of the earth. Can there be a more perfect
ideological basis for civil war?
Why has this become a threat at this point in time? It is not
yet clear whether Sharon really intends to dismantle the few settlements
in the Gaza Strip. But as the settlers see it, even the idea of
removing one single settlement is a casus belli. It attacks everything
that is holy to them. Sharon tried to convince
them that it is only a ploy – to sacrifice a few small settlements
in order to save all the others. In vain.
In preparation for the Great Rebellion, the settlers have unveiled
their potential. The most eminent rabbis of the “Religious
Zionist movement” have declared that the evacuation of a settlement
is a sin against God and have called upon the soldiers to refuse
orders. Hundreds of rabbis, including the rabbis of the settlements
and the rabbis of the religious units in the army have joined the
The voice of the few opponents is being drowned out. They quote
the Talmudic saying “the law of the kingdom is law”,
meaning that every government has to be obeyed, much as Christians
are required to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, etc.
But who listens to these “moderate rabbis” now?
The conquest of the army from the inside
began long ago. The “arrangement” with the “yeshivot
hesder”, that serve in the army as separate units, has allowed
the entry of a stable of Trojan horses into the IDF, including its
officer corps. In any confrontation
between their rabbis and their army commanders, the majority of
the soldiers of the yeshivas will obey the rabbis.
The fact that the settlers and the Hesder Yeshiva have systematically
penetrated the ranks of the officers’ corps means that they
can attempt barratry, potentially even more dangerous than mutiny.
The right-wing refusal to obey orders is unlike the left-wing
conscientious objection. The leftist refusal is a personal stand,
the rightist refusal a collective mutiny. On the left, a few hundred
refused to serve the occupation, on the right, many thousands, even
tens of thousands, will obey their rabbis’ orders to refuse.
As the Chief-of-Staff has warned, the army may disintegrate.
Altogether, the settlers, together with their close allies in
Israel including the yeshiva students, may amount to something like
half a million people, a mighty phalanx for rebellion.
As of now, the settlers are only using this threat as an instrument
for blackmail and deterrence, in order to choke off any thought
of evacuating settlements and territories. But if the blackmail
does not do the job, the Great Rebellion is just a matter of time.
WASHINGTON—In its final hours, the U.S.
presidential campaign has been blown off course by the gale-force
winds of a real world far from the battleground bubbles of Grand
Rapids, Mich., or Des Moines, Iowa.
Eight more dead U.S. Marines in Iraq. Terrorist tapes. Missing
munitions. Hostages. Beheadings. The slaughter of Iraqi security
At the centre of this storm is a man with the low centre of gravity
that allows him to withstand the gusts that buffet others.
How Karl Rove, the political strategist for U.S. President George
W. Bush, handles these external events will go a long way toward
consolidating his reputation as a political Wizard of Oz, a man
who's forged his otherworldly aura as a brilliant, ruthless political
tactician in the final moments of the closest of races.
The genius tag has a limited shelf life, however.
It could be in the trash can by Wednesday morning.
Rarely, if ever, has a single person had the power and responsibilities
behind a presidential campaign like Rove in 2000 and 2004, and there
is nothing in the Bush campaign against Democratic challenger John
Kerry which does not bear his imprint.
The single-minded focus on terror and homeland
security. Character. Resolve. Never vary the message. Never say
you were wrong or apologize. Play the fear card. Always bring it
back to Sept. 11, 2001.
These are the Rove rules.
This squat man, often seen whispering in a reporter's ear, wearing
a windbreaker and a `W' cap, has such a reputation for political
mysticism that no less than journalistic icon Walter
Cronkite, tongue firmly-in-cheek, suggested Friday on CNN that Rove
had likely ordered up the Osama bin Laden tape to take the focus
off the missing 350 tonnes of deadly explosives in Iraq which had
roiled the campaign for almost a week.
Within hours, Rove had his man on the offensive, calling Kerry
"shameful" for trying to score political points from the
bin Laden tape, forcing the Democrats to respond late Friday.
Although the polls don't yet show it, a quick sampling of pundits
and academics yesterday showed the charge may be sticking to Kerry
after he told a Milwaukee interviewer the bin Laden video showed
that Bush "outsourced" the hunt for the Al Qaeda leader
to Afghan warlords.
"It will have a modest effect, but the Kerry campaign overreacted
and some voters could see it as a crass attempt to score some points,"
said Peter Feaver, a political scientist at Duke University in North
Rove is a man who, after all, once won a campaign by launching
anonymous attacks on his own candidate, who, some believe, dispatched
U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney to Hawaii today to build the illusion
of Republican strength on the island and force Democrats into defence.
When an embarrassed CBS anchor Dan Rather had to admit to being
duped in going to air with documents discrediting Bush's National
Guard service, there were immediate whispers that Rove had set him
The Swift Boat Veterans who knocked Kerry off message in August
were rife with Rove associates.
For every admirer of the 53 year old, there is an enemy, someone
who's seen firsthand an eleventh-hour dirty trick that points right
back to Rove.
But when blame is about to be apportioned, the magic man disappears.
"He has his opponents shooting at shadows," says Michael
Munger, the chair of the political science department at Duke University.
"Karl Rove really is one of the best organizers and planners
in politics," says Larry Sabato, a political analyst at the
University of Virginia. "George W. Bush
would never have had a chance in this race without him. You are
seeing the fruition of four years of meticulous planning."
The guy who came prancing to the back of the press plane last
week banging Bush thunder sticks, or ambled back with a cloth surgical
mask over his face, announcing "Dr. Rove is here?"
The guy who collected the bag of ice balls from a hockey rink
and began an ice fight at another campaign stop last week?
Yeah, that's the guy, the one who summed up his political philosophy
in a recently published interview.
"You need to keep talking about the differences," he
said. "You need to keep talking about your agenda. You need
to keep talking about what it is that you hope to achieve in the
next four years and what the job demands are in the way of character
"And you need to do it right up to the closing moment. Nobody
can afford to sort of let up and let their foot off the accelerator
Nothing has been more controversial, daring, or divisive than
Rove's attempt to win Tuesday's election for Bush by consolidating
and mobilizing the Republican base, not reaching out to swing voters.
He has vowed to mobilize an estimated four million evangelical
Christians who did not vote for Bush in 2000. But in consolidating
your base, you inevitably alienate the enemy.
"I believe it cripples the political system's ability to
handle compromise," Munger said. "It has created not just
Congressional gridlock, but hatred, gridlock that is just dripping
"No matter who wins Tuesday, this is like
Beirut. Karl Rove has turned the country into a religious divide,
no longer a political contest, but an ideological contest that endangers
the ability of the system to function."
Democrats point to another problem with Rove's strategy.
He doesn't have the numbers, they say.
"Theirs is a campaign of base-hardening, not base-expanding,"
said Kerry strategist Joe Lockhart.
"A large voter turnout has undermined that ... and now you
see how shaky this assumption is for winning this campaign,"
Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg said a Kerry victory will throw
into question all of Rove's theories.
"We're going to look real hard at whether Rove succeeded
in getting enough energy and enthusiasm among his voters but also
whether he produced more anti-Bush voters than Bush voters,"
Rove comes by his convictions honestly — or dishonestly,
according to detractors.
In 1994, when Bush confounded pundits and beat the popular incumbent
Texas governor Ann Richards, rumours that Richards was a lesbian
or too soft on gays was a staple of the campaign's final days.
The most famous allegations of dirty tricks occurred in the South
Carolina Republican primary in 2000, when Bush faced an unexpectedly
strong challenge by Arizona Senator John McCain.
In the final days, a vicious whisper campaign began accusing McCain
of cracking as a prisoner-of-war, betraying his country and being
mentally unfit for office.
There was word that he had a "Negro" child, word slipped
out that McCain's wife Cindy had a "drug problem."
None of this has ever been pinned on Rove.
In an article in Atlantic Magazine, author Joshua Green recounts
a particularly sardonic Rove manoeuvre in a 1996 race for the Alabama
Supreme Court in which his candidate was losing.
So Rove had flyers printed up, Green writes, viciously attacking
his own candidate and his family and then anonymously flung on voters'
doorsteps, leaving voters with the logical conclusion that dirty
Democrats were attacking the poor Republican.
The flummoxed Democrat didn't know how to react, seeing the futility
of blaming the Republicans for attacking their own candidate.
Rove's man won.
Max Cleland, a triple amputee who lost his limbs in the Vietnam
war, also blames Rove for spearheading an ugly campaign in the 2002
Senate race in Georgia in which Democrat
Cleland was pilloried as unpatriotic and a friend of terrorists
because he opposed the creation of a Homeland Security department
until workers could be unionized. Republican Saxby Chambliss
won the election.
Still, Rove seemed curiously off his game after The New York Times
and CBS News reported 350 tonnes of munitions were missing in Iraq.
Kerry was given two days of attack without an answer from Bush.
Rove could only blame the liberal media.
But even Rove cannot control a cascade of bad news out of Iraq.
On Tuesday he wants to win the popular vote, cement his own reputation
and then begin work on burnishing the Bush legacy.
And if he loses?
"When you lose, you lose and everyone associated with you
is a loser," Sabato says. "It may not be fair, but that
is the way it is."
WASHINGTON — Some people thought the
October surprise would be the president producing Osama.
Instead, it was Osama producing yet another video taunting the
president and lecturing America.
After bin Laden's pre-election commentary from his anchor desk
at a secure, undisclosed location, many TV chatterers and Republicans
postulated that the evildoer's campaign intrusion would help the
O.B.L., they said, might re-elect W.
They follow the Bush strategists' reasoning that since President
Bush rates higher than John Kerry on fighting terror, anytime
Americans get rattled about Iraq and Al Qaeda, it's a plus for the
president. And Republicans can keep claiming that Al Qaeda
wants the "weak" Democrat elected, even as some intelligence
experts suggest the terrorists prefer that the belligerent Mr. Bush
stay in power because he has been a boon to jihadist recruiting,
with his disastrous occupation of Iraq and his true believer, us-versus-them,
The Bushies' campaign pitch follows their usual backward logic:
Because we have failed to make you safe,
you should re-elect us to make you safer. Because we haven't caught
Osama in three years, you need us to catch Osama in the next four
years. Because we didn't bother to secure explosives in Iraq, you
can count on us to make sure those explosives aren't used against
You'd think that seeing Osama looking fit as a fiddle and ready
for hate would spark anger at the Bush administration's cynical
diversion of the war on Al Qaeda to the war on Saddam. It's absurd
that we're mired in Iraq - an invasion the demented vice president
praised on Friday for its "brilliance" - while the 9/11
mastermind nonchalantly pops up anytime he wants. For some, it seemed
cartoonish, with Osama as Road Runner beeping by Wile E. Bush as
Dick Cheney and Rummy run the Acme/Halliburton explosives company
- now under F.B.I. investigation for its no-bid contracts on anvils,
axle grease (guaranteed slippery) and dehydrated boulders (just
add water) .
Osama slouched onto TV bragging about pulling
off the 9/11 attacks just after the president strutted onto TV in
New Hampshire with 9/11 families, bragging that Al Qaeda leaders
know "we are on their trail."
Maybe bin Laden hasn't gotten the word. Maybe W. should get off
the trail and get on Osama's tail.
W. was clinging to his inane mantra that if we fight the terrorists
over there, we don't have to fight them here, even as bin Laden
was back on TV threatening to come here. The president still avoided
using Osama's name on Friday, part of the concerted effort to downgrade
him and merge him with Iraqi insurgents.
The White House reaction to the disclosures about the vanished
explosives in Iraq was typical. Though it's clear the treasures
and terrors of Iraq - from viruses to ammunition to artifacts -
were being looted and loaded into donkey carts and pickups because
we had insufficient troops to secure the country, Bush officials
devoted the vast resources of the government to trying to undermine
the facts to protect the president.
The Pentagon mobilized to debunk the bunker story with a tortured
press conference and a satellite photo of trucks that proved about
as much as Colin Powell's prewar drawings of two trailers that were
supposed to be mobile biological weapons labs.
Republicans insinuated that it was a plot by foreign internationalists
to help the foreigner-loving, internationalist Kerry, a U.N. leak
from the camp of Mohamed ElBaradei to hurt the administration that
had scorned the U.N. as a weak sister.
In their ruthless determination to put Mr. Bush's political future
ahead of our future safety, the White House and House Republicans
last week thwarted the enactment of recommendations of the 9/11
commission they never wanted in the first place.
While pretending to be serious about getting a bill on reorganizing
intelligence agencies before the election, the White House never
forced Congressional Republicans to come to an agreement. So the
advice from the panel that spent 19 months studying how the government
could shore up intelligence so there wouldn't be another 9/11 may
be squandered, even though Dick Cheney's
favorite warning to scare voters away from Mr. Kerry is that we
might someday face terrorists "in the middle of one of our
cities with deadlier weapons than have ever before been used against
us," including a nuclear bomb.
Wow. I feel safer. Don't you?
With his typical flair for drama, Osama Bin
Laden inserted himself directly into the presidential election yesterday,
and both parties believed it would boost President Bush's reelection
Bin Laden popping up like a malignant jack-in-the-box four days
before the balloting may bolster John Kerry's argument that Bush
should have finished wiping out Al Qaeda before turning his attention
But it also refocused the nation on terrorism, which polls show
helps Bush. And it reminds voters of their horror on Sept. 11 and
Bush's well-received response, as well as obliterating the recent
flood of bad news for Bush.
"We want people to think 'terrorism'
for the last four days," said a Bush-Cheney campaign official.
"And anything that raises the issue in people's minds is good
A senior GOP strategist added, "anything
that makes people nervous about their personal safety helps Bush."
He called it "a little gift," saying
it helps the President but doesn't guarantee his reelection.
In the closing weeks of the campaign, Kerry has accused Bush of
"letting Bin Laden escape" when he was cornered at Tora
Bora by "outsourcing" the job to unreliable Afghan warlords
instead of using U.S. troops. And he has mocked Bush for never mentioning
the Al Qaeda leader after pledging to get Bin Laden "dead or
But the new tape - which is so nakedly political that it should
end with the words "I'm Osama Bin Laden and I approved this
message" - makes it difficult for Kerry to keep hammering Bush
on the subject without appearing to be capitalizing on terror. Kerry
eliminated those lines from his speeches yesterday evening.
"If Kerry had been making this a bigger issue, as he should
have been, it would definitely translate to his benefit," said
a Democratic strategist with ties to the Kerry camp.
Kerry's staff looked somber.
"It's very important for us to move forward. We're going
ahead and doing our events as we would," said spokesman Mike
| The dead heat between the two US
presidential candidates has pushed economic arguments ever higher
on the agenda.
President George W Bush is keen to pull employment statistics out
of his sleeve. Almost two million jobs have been created during
the last year, he points out.
Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry is keen to rip Mr
Bush's arguments apart by pointing out that the overall number of
jobs in the US has fallen by more than 800,000 since early 2001.
And so the two men continue their ping-pong match. Selective statistics
are used for political gain, point scoring is the name of the game.
But there is one thing neither candidate is happy
to concede: that unless drastic action is taken, the US could slide
into a painful and lengthy recession.
US GDP growth
Current economic growth is strong at about 3-4%, with the economy
having bounced back from the mini-recession in 2001, and neither
candidate is prepared to accept that the growth rate could slip
back anytime soon.
"Unfortunately, while the debate has also involved competing
claims over qualifications for economic stewardship, neither candidate
has clearly articulated the long-term challenges we now face, much
less a comprehensive and credible vision for meeting them,"
insists Morgan Stanley economist Richard Berner.
It is a controversial view since it suggests that, in economic
terms, it does not really matter who wins the race, as neither have
faced up to the real economic issues. But is it true?
The view may not represent that of the majority - doomsayers rarely
do - but the gloomy arguments are well worth exploring nevertheless.
A major part of the problem is this: The
US is living beyond its means, and this is true both for the American
people and the government.
At the grass-roots level, personal savings for
retirement or for rainy days has fallen out of vogue. Spending,
meanwhile, has reached frantic levels.
Shoppers have been spurred on by tax cuts and
by policy-makers who see them as the main drivers behind economic
growth. Indeed, consumer spending accounts for 70% of economic activity
in the US.
The growth has also been based on easy access
to cheap credit. The private debt burden has ballooned to $9.7 trillion,
equivalent to almost 85% of the country's economic output, or gross
domestic product (GDP).
Some economists say such reliance on the consumer
makes America's economic prosperity fragile, especially given that
the government's finances are in disarray as well.
US government debts have soared to $7.4 trillion. The country's
pensions system is in crisis. And America desperately needs to push
through very expensive health care reform.
"Each candidate claims to acknowledge these challenges, but
in my opinion neither has adequately addressed them," says
At consumer level, policy-makers are left with a tough choice:
encourage consumers to start repaying debts, and spending is hit.
Trying to influence which way consumer demand is heading may be
futile anyway, of course.
During Spring, consumer spending slipped back as confidence was
hit by global insecurity and rising oil prices.
And although demand has since bounced back, the Spring weakness
sparked fears that the consumer might give up the ghost.
Historically high oil prices, coupled with the weak US dollar,
remains problematic, not least due to America's fast growing reliance
on oil imports.
In 1985, the US imported fewer than 5,000 barrels per day. This
year the figure will be closer to 12,000 barrels per day.
All this has led the doomsayers to warn that the US could slide
into a painful and lengthy recession.
If they are right, the US electorate should expect little in the
way of economic remedies promised by both candidates during the
The health care system would not be fixed as promised. Taxes might
have to rise. The country's deficit would not, as promised by both
Mr Bush and his opponent John Kerry, be halved by 2009.
The reasons for this are simple. Both men have based their promises
on the assumption that the US economy will continue to grow by more
than 3% per year throughout the next term.
A recession, or even just slower growth, would make it difficult
for them to keep their promises.
Moreover, however good the presidential candidates' intentions,
they may not be able to push change through Congress where, due
to the close election race, neither party is likely to have a solid
"I share the view of most financial market observers that
neither candidate would have a sweeping mandate to govern, much
less enact changes in economic policy," warns Mr Berner.
Whatever is said in the election campaign by either candidate relies
heavily on their ability to deliver in the face of a recession.
The American voters must try to predict which one of the candidates
would stand the best chance.
BAGHDAD, Oct 31 (Reuters) The body of a kidnapped
Iraqi Kurdish journalist who was well-known in Saddam Hussein's
era has been found in Baghdad, his wife said today.
Nasrallah al-Dawoodi worked as editor of the Arabic-language Iraq
newspaper until Saddam's overthrow by US-led troops. The daily was
devoted mainly to Kurdish affairs.
His wife said Dawoodi, 55, had disappeared on Wednesday after
being invited to a Ramadan evening meal. His kidnappers later contacted
her demanding a big ransom.
Police found Dawoodi's bullet-riddled body
in New Baghdad, a southeastern suburb of the Iraqi capital, yesterday.
A car bomb attack the same day on the Baghdad office of Dubai-based
Al Arabiya television channel killed seven people and wounded 19
in the bloodiest attack on a media organisation since the invasion
in March, 2003.
ROSTOV-ON-DON, Russia (AP) — A car bomb
exploded outside the main hospital in Chechny's capital, Grozny,
today, injuring 17 people in an attack apparently targeting members
of a Chechen security force bringing in wounded from an earlier
explosion, officials said.
The first blast struck a vehicle carrying the Chechen security
troops on a highway in the outskirts of Grozny, Federal Security
Service spokesman Maj.-Gen. Ilya Shabalkin said on Russia's NTV
television. As the injured were being taken into Grozny's Hospital
No. 9, a second car exploded outside the building, he said.
A car laden with explosives detonated outside the hospital around
8 a.m. The blast dug a crater into the ground and shattered the
Thirteen of the wounded were members of the Chechen presidential
security service, headed by Chechen First Deputy Prime Minister
Ramzan Kadyrov, said Maj. Igor Golubenko, a duty officer for the
southern Russian headquarters of the Emergency Situations Ministry
in Rostov-on-Don. Three other victims were hospital workers. The
security service officers appeared to have been the target, Golubenko
said. One child was also injured, he said.
Golubenko said one person was wounded in the highway blast, which
he blamed on a car bomb. Shabalkin, however, put the number of wounded
at three and said one person had died, according to the Russian
media. It was not immediately possible to reconcile the conflicting
BEIJING (AP) - A burst of poisonous gas in
a coal mine in northeast China killed 15 miners, the government
said, days after the death toll in another accident rose to 141.
The rush of gas occurred Saturday at the Xilutian Mine in Fushun,
a city in Liaoning province, when 50 miners were working underground,
the official Xinhua News Agency reported.
The miners were about 395 metres from the entrance of the shaft,
Xinhua said, citing Li Sen, an executive with Fushun Coal Industry
Corp., which owns the mine.
Fifteen workers were killed instantly, while the rest managed
to escape, Li said.
The accident was still being investigated.
China's mines are the world's most dangerous, and thousands of
miners are killed every year in fires, explosions and floods. The
lack of safety equipment and lax regulations are often to blame.
On Oct. 20, a massive blast at a coal mine in the central province
of Henan left 148 miners missing. Last week, rescuers said they
had found 141 bodies and that the remaining workers were unlikely
to have survived.
It was the worst mining accident in four years.
WASHINGTON (AP) - The World Health Organization
has called an unprecedented summit meeting of flu vaccine makers
and countries to ramp up plans for dealing with the growing threat
of a flu pandemic.
Sixteen vaccine companies and health officials from the United
States and other large countries already have agreed to attend the
summit in Geneva, Switzerland, on Nov. 11, said Klaus Stohr, influenza
chief of the United Nations' health agency.
With increasing signs that bird flu is
becoming established in Asia and several worrisome human cases that
can't be linked directly to exposure to infected poultry, it's only
a matter of time until such a virus adapts itself to spread more
easily from person to person and cause a severe worldwide outbreak,
"We believe that we are closer to the next pandemic than
we ever were," Stohr said in an interview before a speech at
an American Society for Microbiology meeting in Washington, D.C.
The world's total capacity for flu vaccine now is only 300 million
doses, and it would take at least six months to develop a new vaccine
to fight a pandemic. The WHO wants to get "all issues on the
table," monetary and scientific, that prevent getting more
vaccine more quickly, he said.
"If we continue as we are now, there will be no vaccine available,
let alone antivirals, when the next pandemic starts," Stohr
said. "We have a window of opportunity now to prepare ourselves."
Flu kills about 36,000 people in the United States and a million
worldwide each year by conservative estimates, Stohr said.
But tens of millions die in a pandemic, which occurs every 20 to
30 years, when a flu strain changes so dramatically that people
have little immunity from previous flu bouts.
The current vaccine shortage in the United States, caused by loss
of one of the country's two major flu shot suppliers, reveals how
vulnerable the world is and serves as a "dress rehearsal"
for the kind of rationing and emergency measures that would be needed
in a pandemic, said Dr. Wendy Keitel of Baylor College of Medicine
"The ability to respond with the production of billions of
doses of vaccine is quite limited," Keitel said. "We need
to think through these problems now. Ninety per cent of vaccines
are produced in 10 countries that have 10 per cent of the world's
The United States is the only country that has commissioned work
on potential pandemic bird flu vaccines, Stohr noted. The
National Institutes of Health has given Aventis Pasteur and Chiron
Corp. contracts to produce prototype bird flu vaccines that are
expected to be ready for human tests late this year. Aventis
already has made 8,000 doses at its plant in Swiftwater, Pa.; Chiron
is making its doses at a factory in Europe, not the one in Britain
that regulators shut down last month, causing the U.S. vaccine shortage.
If a pandemic occurred and a vaccine wasn't ready, antiviral drugs
could play a key role in slowing its spread, said Dr. Frederick
Hayden, a University of Virginia virus expert who has researched
and consulted on many flu vaccines and drugs including oseltamivir,
or Tamiflu, which showed some activity against bird flu in lab experiments.
It, too, is in short supply.
"It's hard to get explicit numbers but the production capacity
worldwide is very limited," making it difficult to develop
an international stockpile that could be used in a pandemic, Hayden
The WHO has 120,000 packages of the drug, Stohr said, and the
United States is stockpiling several million doses.
"That will not go very far" he said, but if targeted
to a region where a pandemic was breaking out, "we might be
able to buy time" and limit its spread while a vaccine was
being readied, he said.
Bird flu actually describes three deadly
strains of avian influenza, which have wiped out millions of chickens
in Asia. So far they have not spread easily from person to person
but have been very deadly to those who have become infected.
They're named and numbered for the two H and N proteins on the surface
of the virus.
The first strain, H5N1, appeared in Hong Kong in 1997, causing
18 human infections and six deaths. It reappeared last year and
so far this year has caused 44 human cases and 32 deaths throughout
Asia, according to Stohr.
A second strain, H9N2, appeared in 1999 in Hong Kong and China,
and caused two human cases in Hong Kong last year. A third strain,
H7N7 appeared in 2003 in the Netherlands.
GILGIT, November 01 (Online): Mild Intensity
tremors were felt in Gilgit and its surrounding areas on Sunday
According to TV report, the first shock of tremors was felt at
5:19 am early morning and was recorded at 4.8
on the Richter scale.
The second shock was felt around 11:03 am and was recorded on
the Richter scale as 4.5 in Gilgit and surrounding areas.
It is pertinent to mention that no loss of life or damage to property
was reported till the filing of the report.
Residents of the wine country felt the earth
move under their feet Friday morning, as a magnitude 3.8
earthquake struck southwestern Lake County.
The temblor, which hit at 11:02 a.m., was centered 26 miles north
of Santa Rosa near the Geysers area. The earthquake occurred at
the relatively shallow depth of about 2.6 miles.
The quake was felt fairly strongly in Middletown and other communities
in southern Lake County, although reports of shaking were received
from throughout Napa and Sonoma counties.
Some seismologists believe a rash of recent earthquakes in the
area are the result of a project to inject thousands of gallons
of water into the ground to replenish steamfields. The steam drives
turbines at a geothermal powerplant located at the Geysers, just
two miles from the epicenter of quake.
No reports of damage or injuries have been received.Story last
Cape Coast, Ghana - The Cape Coast Municipal
Chief Executive, Mr Muniru Arafat Nuhu on Friday observed that the
upsurge in the number of minor earth tremors should give cause for
He said the fear of major earthquake in Accra and its environs
was more frightening since "not all the active faults in the
country have been clearly located and mapped and for us to know
the exact locations to prepare a seismic hazard map".
These were contained in an address read on his behalf at a forum
organised by National Disaster Management Organisation (NADMO) to
mark the celebration of World Disaster Day at Cape Coast.
Mr Arafat Nuhu said the existence of such a map would inform prospective
estate developers to make the appropriate designs that could resist
high degree of ground shaking.
He said a number of houses in the Municipality were owner-built
with little or no engineering, which put the occupants to great
risks in the event of an earthquake. [...]
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in your part
of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy
Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org
Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.