|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Light Waves
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
Deer
in the headlights Searching for the truth is ugly,
frightening and dangerous
— and the only worthwhile choice |
By John Kaminski
skylax@comcast.net |
Maybe I'm already sufficiently
hunkered down; safely ensconced in my leaky trailer; barricaded
against the onslaughts to come; insulated from the contrived
catastrophes that get worse with each new assault; prepared
for the biological barrage our masters have scheduled
for us to cull this feckless human herd and make their
sinister existences even more profitable; as fortified
as I can be against the imminent financial collapse about
to engulf us all, at least for someone who earns his meager
coins by hurling reckless adjectives at all these endless
crimes against humanity.
After all, they haven't come for me yet. But will they
come next week?
Oh, I am so prudent. I remove the magnetic antiwar sticker
from my trunk in certain rural parking lots so the rednecks
won't trash my car. Mmm, such courage. And sagacity. And
always the darting eyes of man hazardously at large in
an alien world. Who the hell are all these people, and
why are practically all of them fast asleep?
Never have I heard so much talk as over the past few
years about people wanting to escape from warmongering
America. I get postcards from Costa Rica, cryptic e-mails
from Thailand, letters about how nice it is in Denmark
or Portugal or Brazil, all from people who have shucked
that furtive sense of panic that still grips many people
with actually functioning souls who remain uneasily in
their decaying United States.
Once I wrote that we shouldn’t run off to foreign
places, that the best of us should stay and fight for
what is truly ours. But who can blame those of us who
are intimidated by the widespread lack of support for
values and actions that are truly humane. What’s
the score now? About six people in the entire Congress
who are apt to tell the unvarnished truth about anything?
And not a single newspaper.
To not be afraid is to be stupid.
I have already received several notes from people who
journeyed to Oklahoma City recently especially to see
me. I had volunteered to go and participate in the group
analysis of a previous disaster, now several incidents
removed from the current affront to all things decent
and holy, which is of course the continuing massacre of
innocents in a faraway country whose oil America wishes
to steal.
Some of you may remember that I canceled my appearance,
essentially because of three things: extreme poverty;
disenchantment with the overly respectful (and hence,
IMHO, futile) way the organizers of the event planned
to discuss this clear case of mass murder of American
citizens by the American government. And, of course, fear
of flying. I love to fly. But I wish to avoid having my
orifices scrutinized by minimum wage Homeland Security
goons.
More to the point in my recent field of vision were
the hundreds of letters that have recently blessed me
with tokens of appreciation for my efforts at describing
how so-called humans can be so inhuman. We're talking
cold hard cash here, folks, and book orders. In between
my scribbled rants that often show up in the most unexpected
places, I eke out an austere living by selling my books,
in which I have collected these very rants. I am always
uneasy about asking for support, and always humbled by
the sincere ways in which many people respond.
People (them again) always ask me, "How can you
read all those horrible stories day after day and not
be affected by them; how can you keep from slitting your
wrists?" or something along those lines. It's a question
I don't usually answer.
But when I try to, I think of that series of photos
taken at a checkpoint in Iraq in which triggerhappy U.S.
troops shot first and asked questions later, later to
find six terrified and bleeding children in the car that
rolled to a stop. I think of that little bleeding girl
screaming over her butchered parents, and U.S. soldiers
wearing masks to hide their identities from the photographer.
That little girl is my boss. And the rage I feel at the
people who put her in that position, I'm telling you,
is simply more than you want to hear. Why do I do what
I do, and how can I stand what I have to look at? I work
for that little girl, and if you don't too, then you have
a problem with me.
Because if you don't work for her, that means you're
an accomplice to mass murder (which as Americans, we all
are), and that means I'm going to seriously kick your
ass if I get the chance, although as you have rightly
guessed by now, it will only be verbally and from a distance.
Likewise, I work for the souls of those kids in that
Murrah building daycare center so righteously snuffed
out by all those federal employees who were warned not
to go to work that day. Which is why I got somewhat upset
by the relatively inferential (as opposed to confrontational)
intent of the organizers who had chronicled the irrefutable
evidence that the OKC attack on humanity was not about
a renegade pseudopatriot with a truck bomb, but about
a government conducting an experiment on its population’s
social alienation from reality. Which spectacularly continues,
meaning the experiment was a success.
I wrote a story for that group, but they didn't want
it because they already had plenty of good ones (especially
by Pat Shannan and Craig Roberts), and I know it's only
a fool who quotes himself, but here's part of what I wrote:
Your silence guarantees
more phony disasters
American cowardice triumphs as the facts
of the OKC bombing remain concealed
They come into your town, commit some unpardonable
crime, then disappear into the night.
The cops follow, explain the event in some way that
absolutely does not make sense, some luckless patsy
is put on trial, convicted by a judge who excludes most
of the relevant evidence, and the patsy is executed.
Case closed, the government tells you.
The next day the ad-filled newspapers embellish the
official version. Legislation is then passed to prevent
the contrived atrocities they took such pains to explain.
But as you contemplate the blazing memory of the sight
of your beloved children exploded into little bloody
pieces or crushed by fallen debris, you wonder what
you should say, what you can do.
When you attempt to express your doubts about what
happened, you are looked upon with a nervous terror
by your neighbors. You receive unmistakable messages
that you really shouldn't go there, out of concern for
your own health, your own future.
The messages include newspaper reports of others who
didn't heed this advice and were discovered in some
odd place after their puzzling and unexpected suicides.
So the message gets through to most, and a brittle
silence engulfs the land.
After awhile, those who continue to speak about the
incompatibility of what was written down and what they
saw with their own eyes begin to be tolerated as amusing
oddities, embarrassing gadflies, whimsical conspiracy
theorists.
The voluminous dossiers of suppressed facts they have
compiled are regarded as mere evidence of their quirkiness,
and can never supplant the initial impression that the
popular cover story has hazed over the general populace,
anesthetizing the consensus thought process like some
warm, familiar blanket, which most refuse to realize
is permeated with a smallpox of the mind.
"Well, we know it was those damned terrorists,"
is the repeated mantra. "That's why we make war
on them."
"You don't want to put yourself in a place you
know you can't go," say others, reviving a variation
of the old canard that you can't fight city hall, and
thereby guaranteeing that the sudden act of vicious
tragedy will happen again in some other town, and be
followed by the same process of phony explanation, prosecuted
patsy, and ultimately suppressed knowledge of what really
happened.
It is the one consistent pattern of American history.
The majority don't really know what happened, and are
terrified to challenge the official version lest they
be blackballed by their cowardly neighbors, or worse,
ruined or killed by the same shadowy, unidentified forces
who perpetrated the original crime and then covered
it up.
For those who disregard the obvious dangers and continue
to speak the truth as they perceive it, the rewards
are bittersweet and intangible.
OK. Now, from that point on, I attempted to discuss
specifics I had learned, mostly from organizers Charles
Key and Chris Emery. The story gets pretty involved, and
I had garbled some of those facts. So in the rush to put
together their program, they didn't have time to instruct
me on every point, and the story didn't get published.
That’s OK by me. No biggie. Their task was humongous.
The event was, according to some, a great success, in
that at least California Rep. Dana Rohrabacher is mulling
over the possibility of reopening an investigation into
allegations that McVeigh and Nichols were assisted in
handling explosives by the FBI. But as I said before,
it will accomplish nothing. Too many paid-off shills in
the way. This a political sop. The OKC coverup continues.
And what is worse is that the confidence of some of
us who care has been badly shaken, mostly by the decision
to invite reactionary politician Bob Barr as the featured
speaker at the OKC 10th anniversary probe and gathering.
It comes to me as a terrible shock that the very center
of the resistance movement to the government’s coverup
in OKC may, in fact, be rotten to the core.
So I, in my own way, continue on my atrocity watch,
not to dabble in the lurid and duplicitous for its own
titillating sake, but to analyze the inexplicable self-destructive
behavior of humans and perhaps by talking about it, ameliorating
it. Perhaps by understanding it, detoxifying it.
I tend to link OKC and Waco together in my mind. They
were both unexplained government atrocities in the early
1990s, and some people accepted the government’s
phony aspersions about the Patriot movement doing OKC
in retaliation for Waco. But just the other day, a dozen
years after federal troops incinerated all those women
and children in that farmhouse, I finally heard the most
plausible story of what I think really happened.
Now, as many of you know, I tend to reject out-of-hand
any contentions that we are ruled by supernatural forces,
be they angelic or alien. In my simple mind, it just makes
life too complicated. Yet, you must accept valid information
where you find it, which is sometimes in unexpected places.
And you can’t let your own paradigms and beliefs
get in the way of hearing what you need to hear. The penalty
for that is the ugly world we have now.
Over time, I have received many recommendations to check
out a website that utilizes as its chief metaphorical
theme communication with a group of extraterrestrials
known as Cassiopaeans. Having seriously dabbled with many
New Age subjects in the early ’90s and found the
genre as riddled as the Patriot movement with creepy charlatans
and egotistical psychos, I tend to dismiss such recommendations
out-of-hand. But that is not to say it can all be dismissed
in such a way. [SOTT NOTE: We do not in fact describe
the Cassiopaeans as extraterrestrials, although Kaminski's
misreading is understandable given the wide play given
to ETs by other websites. The Cassiopaeans have described
themselves to us as "We are you in the future".
They may also simply be the expression of the subconscious
of Laura Knight-Jadczyk. We do not know, nor do we take
the information gathered from them at face value. Everything
they tell us is then researched to be confirmed or refuted
according to our own work on the subject. Those issues
that cannot be evaluated based on our own research, such
as information about things that happened thousands or
tens of thousands of years ago, are treated as possibilities
that may or may not be true.]
When you look at the work of Laura Knight-Jadczyk and
her physicist husband Arkadius, fast-buck operators seeking
to harvest cash from seances is not what you see. I’m
not sure that sending you to http://www.cassiopaea.com/cassiopaea/adventureindex.htm
is the proper way into their insightful milieu, but it’s
the way I went in. And I have no intention to commenting
right now on the validity of the worth of their Quantum
Future School or perceptions that are beyond the grasp
of my own, but what I did find in their site at this very
link — http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/organic_portals.htm
— was a fascinating examination of the nature of
psychopathy, which in my mind bears very directly on the
situation we are all facing in this messed up world today.
I know this explanation is getting a little long, but
bear with me. As you know, we all have been looking for
a way to explain the behavior and the rude and rapacious
men who run our world, who are running it into the ground.
They are not like us (or, they are not like me, I don’t
know about you, really).
One of the more fascinating and enigmatic explanations
of what is actually happening in the world today is put
forth by British phenom David Icke, whose many books and
lectures have posited that the powers that be are actually
reptilian shapeshifters, cold blooded in the truest sense.
Many people find that assertion preposterous, and turn
away. I’ve always related to it in a metaphorical
sense, and in any case respect Icke for being one of the
bravest men in the world for even attempting to tackle
problems in the way he does.
But given my queasy uneasiness with such fanciful interpretations,
I sometimes feel choosing to go to this level can be a
distraction from the problems themselves. Not so with
Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s explanation — the mask
of sanity. And the assertion of the Quantum Future School
that the official
culture in America is a natural state of psychopathy.
Hey! You only need to read a newspaper that the assertion
is true. I highly recommend this information. Go to http://www.cassiopaea.com/cassiopaea/psychopath.htm
But let me first synopsize my understanding of it, and
tell you about the event that triggered Waco, because
it bears on the tragedy and disappointing drive to unearth
the truth about Oklahoma City. (I know this is convoluted;
thank you for your patience.)
From one of Laura’s reviews of a book titled “The
Mask of Sanity” by Hervey Cleckley comes this description:
... a person who is able to mimic the human personality,
but who leaves the impression that something is not
there. They have a personality structure which “functions
in a manner apparently identical with that of normal,
sane functioning” and yet when all is said and
done, “we are dealing here not with a complete
man at all but with something that suggests a subtly
constructed reflex machine which can mimic the human
personality perfectly” to the point that “no
one who examines him in a clinical setting can point
out in scientific or objective terms why, or how, he
is not real.”
In my own search to identify who some have called “biorobots,”
I find that when Knight-Jadczyk draws upon the work of
Cleckley and the Russian exile Boris Mouravieff and labels
half the human population “organic portals,”
or people without souls, she is right on target in explaining
why the newspaper headlines are the way they are these
days, or have always been.
I know. It should come as no surprise to me that people
don’t always to the right thing. But this line of
investigation strikes me as the way to actually fix the
problem, for all you out there who frequently suggest
I complain too much and don’t do enough about proposing
solutions. Understanding this concept is definitely the
beginning of a solution to why the human race seems hellbent
on destroying our planet.
The Jadczyks, as I understand it, have had a hard time
with a fellow named Rick Ross, who once upon a time ran
an outfit called the Cult Awareness Network, which supposedly
rescued runaway teens who had been lured away from their
parents by Moonies, Hare Krishnas and other exotic thought
processes.
Yet it was Rick Ross and the Cult Awareness Network
who told Janet Reno that David Koresh was abusing children
at his Waco compound. And, of course, when you get into
why he would do such a thing, and what it all means, you
of course get into — you guessed it, Zionist influence,
subterranean motivational activity that results in false
flag operations like COINTELPRO, and worse (if there can
be something worse than COINTELPRO?).
Observe, in this snippet lifted from <http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/rickross2.htm>
What a lot of people don't keep in mind is the fact
that COINTELPRO also concentrated on creating bogus
organizations through which hostile actions might be
instigated and blamed on innocent third parties.
In other words, creating bogus Palestinian Terrorists
to attack the World Trade Center is entirely within
the tradition of COINTELPRO - and we have seen, over
and over again, a string of incidents when purported
"Islamic Terrorists" have been noted, but
the FBI and CIA just simply turn their heads and order
their agents to stand down! One then begins to wonder
just WHO initiated the COINTELPRO idea in the FBI?
We, or some of you out there, desperately need to put
the pieces together on all this. This describes Waco,
Oklahoma City, and the 9/11 massacres. We as a nation
and as a species need to see who is doing what to whom,
to us, before it’s too late.
Now (don’t hit me!), I said all that to say this.
Or more precisely, to let someone else say this. One
of the letters I received from someone who traveled to
the disappointing Oklahoma City protest had this to say
(I’m not sure if I should use his name or not, given
the nature of the subject matter):
Beam me up, Scotty! Yeah, the Cognitive Dissonance
is ringing in my ears, it's so strong. A Dallas-local
NewAge-ey speaker gave a talk last year on America's
Shadow, in which he pretty accurately (but not totally
completely) laid out a list of "our" continuing
atrocities, dating from the 1800s. Very interesting
and informative, and right in line with what I had already
discovered that had me disparaging my parents and grandparents
for blindly and blithely ignoring in their time; going
along to get along until it gets to me and its a steaming
heap of manure so high it obscures the horizon.
By the time I've come to awareness of the depth of
the problem and the real issues, its an un-winnable
situation. The media's sewn up. The voting process is
totally co-opted. Whistleblowers are regularly and severely
dealt with. The economic situation is getting ratcheted
down to where the "middle class" becomes a
term applying to the 1950s through the '70s; a historical
footnote. Yet there is still so much residual inflationary
"prosperity" that anyone and their kid brother
can still float a loan on a new SUV. An economic sugar
cube trail into a box canyon with debt in hot pursuit!
But, John, I've crashed some of the Homey Land security
meets and listened to talks that will never make the
cyclops tube. There is no going back. Even your words
so far, which will echo in cyberspace long after you've
made your decision to stay and slug it out or bail —
those will not be forgotten.
If you had made it to OKC to speak, you could have
listened to Gen. Partin and seen a few charts he held
up. He maintains it's the same plan being carried out
here that's been done throughout the world. Cut to the
chase — when control is really consolidated, when
level Red is reached, it's round-up time. You, me, and
anyone that cracked a joke at the wrong party, you're
a marked man. Know it. Everything now is just marking
time.
So, what to do? I'm probably the wrong person to offer
an opinion, because I'm sitting here with two little
scars on my chest ... the nearest guess I have is from
a Taser hit 10 or 11 months ago. One of the wounds would
not heal until I pulled a small piece of shirt material
out with tweezers. I still have the shirt with the holes
in it. Meanwhile, I developed a nice bruise over a vein
inside my right elbow. I really wish they'd use the
left, y'know. Hard to hide the bruise when you're shaking
hands, etc. I'm missing no more than 3 to 5 hours of
time I can't account for, but after all this time I've
only got a vague memory of what transpired, and one
or two faces I might recognize; nothing more. And I'm
really hoping I'll recover the whole thing, but not
successful so far. So much for being an objective journalist!
So, what was this? This is how Homeland Security develops
witnesses for their secret courts. And this is why they
cannot reveal their sources. They're using you, or in
this case, me, as a witness against ourselves. That's
my best guess. Payback for me getting too close.
Can I reasonably conclude different? If I had been
involved in planning anything nefarious I am sure I
wouldn't be typing this note to you now. As it is, I'm
just a truth seeker who found enough to speak out occasionally.
And because I have some moral sense, no, it is not okay
what they have done and are doing to people. It is diabolical.
So, here's my challenge. Even if you decide to quit,
can you, really?
After what I've been through, I can't. I'm still out
there gathering crumbs dropped by the cryptocracy, trying
to make sense of it. When I don't have "real"
work, I paint houses; do deliveries; anything to keep
the bill collectors at bay til I can get back to my
real work, my passion. It's not dedication, per se.
When you truly understand what's coming, can you do
anything else?
Can you?
So there I sat, and here I sit. I hear the train coming.
I see the light of Code Red blazing deadly in the dreams
of my vision. I see the psychopaths driving the train.
I am not an Organic Portal, though they are. I am a deer
in the headlights. And they are the hunters.
All I ever promised was to keep pounding on this keyboard
until the very last moment.
John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast
of Florida, who makes his living writing stories like
this one, which are seen on hundreds of websites around
the world, and collected into anthologies which he sells
on his website, http://www.johnkaminski.com/
|
A GOP operative named
Kyle Vallone admits he "had a hand in 200 bogus letters
published in Northern California newspapers" over
the last decade. Some of his recent work? While assisting
Bill Jones' 2004 senate campaign, he sent out seven fake
letters blasting Democratic incumbent Barbara Boxer. Also
on his resume: Plagiarizing part of a Wall Street Journal
article for one letter and using the name of a friend
of Barbara Boxer for one of his anti-Boxer missives. Now
that his efforts are getting attention, however, he's
having a moment of self-doubt. "I don't know that
I am going to retire. We'll see how this plays. If I get
a lot of crap about it, I probably am going to retire."
|
In
the wake of Bush’s invasion of Iraq and all the corporate
media driven drivel supporting it, I have yet to encounter
a coherent explanation of what it means to “support
our troops.” I am told that I can be against the “war”
(invasion and occupation) and still “support our troops.”
How one can “support” the soldiers
who are exacting Bush’s bloody aggression against the
people of Iraq and claim to be against the “war” is
not explained. It is impossible
to separate the two. If you “support the troops,” you
support killing 100,000 Iraqis, you support eventually
killing innumerable Iraqis with depleted uranium, you
support malnutrition, disease, and misery. It’s that
simple.
Enter “country music legend” Dolly Parton. Ms. Parton
“hosted” a “special broadcast” of the War and Mass Murder
Department’s (otherwise known as the Defense Department)
“America Supports You” campaign aired live on the War
Department’s American Forces Television yesterday. “Performers
at the live show, which included Parton, The Grascals,
Hanna-McEuen and Jo Dee Messina, dedicated songs to
servicemembers,” reports Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample
of the American Forces Press Service. “And in the audience,
Parton welcomed a surprise special guest on stage, the
newest member of the Grand Ole Opry family, Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.”
Sort of like welcoming Herman Goring, Martin Bormann,
or Heinrich Himmler into the family.
After thanking Parton, the other artists and
country music lovers from around the world for supporting
the military, the secretary presented a special message
to troops watching the program overseas and those
listening here at home.
“I’d like to say to each of them, volunteers
all, ‘Thank you so much for your service to the country.
And thank you to your families and your loved ones
as well because they too sacrifice, and we appreciate
them,’” he said.
“And each of the men and women in uniform needs
to know that the great sweep of history is from freedom,
and they are on freedom’s side. They are on that side,
and it’s the right side,” he said. “So God bless them,
and God bless their families, and God bless this wonderful
country of ours.”
Is it possible “country music lovers from around the
world” support invading sovereign nations and killing
thousands of innocent people? Is it possible they find
it acceptable to “sacrifice” their loved ones in the
name of “reshaping” the Middle East, in other words
bombing the hell out of the place until it becomes a
“functioning democracy” (as Richard Haass, U.S. State
Department policy planning director and president of
the Council on Foreign Relations, terms it)? Naturally,
democracies, especially for Arabs, work best after their
civilian infrastructure is decimated, hospitals ransacked
as “propaganda centers,” ambulance drivers executed.
Bushcon democracy works best after twelve years of medieval
siege-like sanctions have killed 500,000 children, after
tons of depleted uranium are scattered about the country,
resulting in a cancer epidemic. Democracy, in
the “real world” so scorned by Bushcons and Republicans
(and no small number of Democrats), translates into
massive and unrelenting misery—streets awash in sewage,
intermittent electricity, Israeli-like checkpoints,
and street violence and lawlessness unheard of before
Saddam Hussein was deposed.
Yes, it is possible, in fact it is exactly what Rumsfeld
and Parton are saying, although Parton may not possess
the intelligence to discern otherwise, whereas Rumsfeld,
like Herman Goring, as president of the Council of Ministers
for Defense of the Reich and General of the SS, knows
exactly what he is doing.
Parton told the audience that she was happy
to host the show in partnership with the Defense Department’s
America Supports You campaign “to show our wonderful
soldiers all over the world how much we appreciate
and support them.”
Sorry, Dolly. But this American does not support “our
wonderful soldiers,” regardless of the absurd dictum
that if one does not enthusiastically support mass murder
and flattening cities (Falluja) in Stalingradesque fashion,
one is “un-American” or even a traitor. I can’t think
of anything more disgusting and reprehensible than sidling
up to one of history’s most notorious war criminals
and cheering on the murder of thousands stacked upon
thousands of babies and grandmothers in Iraq.
I will support “our wonderful soldiers” when they
return to the United States and do what they are supposed
to do—protect this country, not be used as shock troops
and SA units in the neocon-neolib plan to “reshape”
the Middle East in the name of marauding multinational
corporations and racist Zionists who view themselves
as suzerains. |
An Italian journalist who
was held hostage in Iraq has criticised a US military report
into the killing of the agent who helped secure her release.
Italian Nicola Calipari was shot by US forces at a checkpoint
as he escorted Giuliana Sgrena to Baghdad's airport.
US investigators are said to have found that the troops
were "not culpable", in a report which Italy
has not endorsed.
Ms Sgrena described the conclusion as a "slap in
the face" and urged the Italian government to react.
"The greatest disappointment would
be if our authorities were to accept this insult without
reacting," Ms Sgrena wrote in a front page editorial
in her newspaper, Il Manifesto.
"All the words said about Calipari
would turn into hypocrisy... and Nicola would have been
our government's hero, just for one day."
Although Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi has
been a staunch US ally in the conflict in Iraq, the war
is very unpopular with the Italian people.
A report exonerating the soldiers involved
in the shooting could prove inflammatory in Italy, and
damaging to Mr Berlusconi.
Correspondents say attempts may be made
to agree on a mutually acceptable version before the report
is published.
Events unclear
Mr Calipari was hailed as a national hero after he was
shot while trying to protect Ms Sgrena from gunfire.
Rome and Washington have differed over what led to the
incident in March.
A US army official said on Monday that they still disagree
over the speed at which the vehicle approached the checkpoint
and how much communication there was between those in
the car and the checkpoint guards.
"The United States is ready to release the report
but Italy has more questions," the official said.
The US military said the car carrying Mr Calipari was
speeding as it approached the temporary checkpoint in
western Baghdad.
They said the soldiers used "hand and arm signals,
flashing white lights and firing warning shots" to
get the driver to stop.
However, Ms Sgrena, who was hurt in the incident, said
the car had not been speeding and that there had been
no warning before the troops opened fire.
'Feel terrible'
The US military said it had had no knowledge of the rescue
mission, dismissing as "absurd" Ms Sgrena's
suggestion the troops may have deliberately targeted her
car.
Just after the incident, she said it was possible the
soldiers had targeted her because Washington opposed the
policy of negotiating with kidnappers.
"The soldiers were only complying with the standard
operating procedures for those checkpoints, so therefore
are not culpable to dereliction of duty [charges],"
the US army official told Reuters news agency.
"Everybody feels terrible about it," he said.
The soldiers involved will reportedly face no disciplinary
action. |
WASHINGTON, April
26 (Xinhuanet) -- A wide-ranging survey published Tuesday
suggested that US President George W. Bush is off to a
difficult start in his second term, with a precipitous
decline in support for the centerpiece of his Social Security
plan and drops in his performance ratings.
Despite the fact that Bush and other administration
officials have been stumping the country in a 60-day blitz
to mobilize support for his Social Security reform plan,
a bare majority, or 51 percent of the surveyed, opposed
the plan, while 45 percent supported it, The Washington
Post-ABC news poll showed.
The key of the Social Security reform plan is to set
up private or personal accounts.
The poll also registered drops in key Bush performance
ratings, growing pessimism about the economy and continuing
concern about US involvement in Iraq.
Bush's overall job approval rating stood at 47 percent,
matching his all-time low in Washington Post-ABC News
polls. Half disapproved of the job he is doing as president.
On several other key measures of performance, Bush's
standing with the public was at or near new lows, with
less than half of the public supporting the way he is
handling the economy, energy policy and Iraq. Almost six
in 10 said the United States has gotten bogged down in
Iraq.
Bush continues to get strong marks on his handling of
the campaign against terrorism, with 56 percent supporting
his actions, down five points since January. But the survey
also found that the sluggish economy has eclipsed terrorism
on the public's list of top priorities, fueling Bush's
drop in the polls.
On the issue of Social Security, which Bush has made
the principal domestic priority of his second term, the
poll found that three in 10 approved of the job he is
doing, while 64 percent disapproved, an eight-point increase
in disapproval in a month. Only a third said they trust
Bush more than the Democrats to handle the Social Security
issue, a new low for the president.
A total of 1,007 randomly selected adults took part
in the pollconducted on April 21-24. The margin of sampling
error for the overall results is plus or minus three percentage
points. |
Across the nation’s
capital, perplexed political pundits have been rubbing
their chins wondering what has happened to the Democrats,
who were supposed to quiver in fear of the victorious
George W. Bush and his Republican congressional majority.
Instead, the minority party has been picking – and
even winning – some fights.
The Washington Post put the mystery on Page One with
the headline, “Unexpectedly, Capitol Hill Democrats
Stand Firm.” [April 25, 2005]
The Post story said, “Democrats were supposed to
enter the 109th Congress meek and cowed, demoralized by
November’s election losses and ready to cut deals
with Republicans who threatened further campaigns against
‘obstructionists.’ But House and Senate Democrats
have turned that conventional wisdom on its head.”
The mystery is, how did this happen? How did the Democrats
find their voice and gain the upper hand over Bush on
a number of issues: Social Security, his right-wing judicial
appointments, the Terri Schiavo case, Tom DeLay’s
ethics mess and the John Bolton nomination? What has caused
the Democrats to grow a new spine?
Self-Inflicted Wounds
Certainly part of the explanation is Republican miscalculation,
starting with Bush’s post-election decision to make
partial privatization of Social Security his major domestic
policy initiative. Bush also brazenly named the undiplomatic
Bolton to a sensitive diplomatic job as U.N. ambassador.
Congressional Republicans overplayed their hand, too.
They changed the ethics process to protect House Majority
Leader DeLay from more reprimands. They appeared to pander
to the Christian Right by intervening in the case of Terri
Schiavo, a brain-damaged woman whose feeding tube was
removed. The Republicans even let the Schiavo debacle
taint the battle over confirming right-wing judges.
But another part of the answer lies with the Democrats.
They appear less defensive, more willing to make their
arguments without so many equivocations. Though there
are still flashbacks to the old Democrats – for
instance, Sen. Joe Biden’s reference to Alberto
Gonzales as “old buddy” at the Attorney General’s
confirmation hearing – those examples are rarer.
One explanation for the Democrats’ turnabout
is the rise of progressive media, most notably progressive
AM talk radio which has expanded rapidly over the past
several months. Finally, Democratic leaders can go on
sympathetic radio shows and make their case directly to
listeners.
Before, Democrats almost always would find themselves
speaking in unfriendly territory. Sometimes they would
appear on conservative media, such as Fox News, or they’d
face mainstream pundits eager to prove they weren’t
liberal by being tougher on Democrats than Republicans,
the likes of NBC’s Tim Russert.
Faced with hostile questioning, national Democrats often
sought a safe middle ground, which made them look weak
or indecisive, opening them to attacks as “flip-floppers”
or “lacking conviction.” On the other hand,
Republicans could count on friendly receptions from conservative
hosts and mostly deferential treatment on mainstream programs.
Limbaugh’s Value
For more than a decade now, conservative talk radio has
had the Republicans’ back. Republicans could count
on Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, et al to go out on the
nation’s air waves and organize support for conservative
positions. Whenever Republicans were in a tough spot,
they knew they had defenders.
That, in turn, meant Republicans had more margin of error
when making their case. An overstatement – or even
an outright falsehood – wouldn’t be a political
death knell. So, Bush could talk loosely about Democratic
senators as “not interested in the security of the
American people” or pretend that Iraq’s Saddam
Hussein had barred U.N. weapons inspectors before the
war and expect little fallout. [See Consortiumnews.com’s
“Reality on the Ballot.”]
By contrast, Democrats could expect any clumsy remark
to be turned into a huge controversy both by mainstream
and conservative news outlets. In Campaign 2004, John
Kerry got pummeled for saying that he had supported one
version of an Iraq War appropriations bill but opposed
another, when it was barely mentioned that Bush had opposed
the first version and supported the second.
Four years earlier, Al Gore saw his words twisted beyond
recognition to make him out to be a liar or delusional,
a crucial factor in Election 2000. [See Consortiumnews.com’s
“Al Gore v. the Media.”] During the run-up
to war in Iraq, Gore was savaged again for his thoughtful
critiques of Bush’s unilateralist foreign policy.
[See Consortiumnews.com’s “Politics of Preemption.”]
The liberals simply lacked a media that could defend
Democrats when they took tough stands or when they made
innocent mistakes. They were pretty much on their own,
helping to explain their timidity.
Left Side
But that dynamic has begun to change as more U.S. cities
get “progressive talk radio” stations, which
now number more than 50. Though still far fewer than the
hundreds of conservative talk radio outlets, this “left
side of the dial” is reaching critical mass, altering
the political psyche both of rank-and-file Democrats and
their leaders.
With humor and without deference, the
progressive hosts give voice to the outrage that many
American liberals feel over what they regard as years
of conservative highhandedness – a stolen election
in 2000, a deceptive case for war in Iraq in 2002-03,
and the smearing of Kerry’s war record in 2004.
After more than a decade of the Right’s
near monopoly of AM talk radio, listeners on the Left
are taking pleasure in hearing the conservatives get a
taste of their own medicine. Hosts – such as Stephanie
Miller, Randi Rhodes, Al Franken and Ed Schultz –
dish out a mixture of satire, ridicule and information.
Leading Democratic politicians from the House and Senate
are lining up as guests, but now they are addressing an
audience that expects tough talk about the Republicans,
not mushy rhetoric designed not to offend.
In effect, a political market is emerging that rewards
courageous Democrats and punishes wimpy ones. That is
why references to Sen. Joe Lieberman bring derisive laughter
on progressive talk radio shows because he is viewed as
an archetype of the Democrat who seeks acceptance from
the Brit Humes and Tim Russerts.
Liberalism also has gained media traction through the
emergence of irreverent Internet sites, distribution of
progressive documentaries on DVDs, and the satire of Jon
Stewart’s “The Daily Show,” which pokes
fun at both the Bush administration and the national news
media.
Anti-Bush Cool
For the first time in memory, many Americans
are hearing coherent and consistent arguments from progressives.
It’s suddenly cool to stand up to Bush and to recognize
the phoniness of the mainstream media.
The lesson for progressive leaders would seem to be that
media holds a huge potential for energizing liberals,
challenging the Bush administration and reaching out to
moderate Americans who are growing more alarmed over right-wing
radicalism. Yet, despite this opportunity, many leading
figures on the Left remain resistant to expanding the
progressive media effort. [...]
Now, the media tide is showing signs of shifting. Progressives
on talk radio are defending liberal values and criticizing
conservative hypocrisy. Emboldened, Democratic politicians
are starting to find their voice, too, and the Republicans
have begun to stumble.
Progressives, who have long puzzled over how to get the
Democrats to fight back, are discovering that relatively
minor investments in media can bring major returns in
convincing Democrats that there is a future in standing
up to Republicans.
Ironically, however, the “progressive establishment”
may ultimately save the conservatives’ hide by balking
at plans for more media expansion and by refusing to learn
lessons from the Mystery of the Democrats’ New Spine. |
WASHINGTON, April
25 (Xinhuanet) -- Five international airports in the United
States will test new technology ranging from the cell
phones to high-tech iris scanners to better protect them
from terrorism, the US Transportation Security Administration
(TSA) announced Monday.
"These programs will deploy various technologies,
including state-of-the-art video surveillance, Radio Frequency
Identification cards, iris scan readers, and hand geometry
readers to protect against unwanted guests going to secure
areas of the airport," David M. Stone, assistant
secretary of homeland security for the TSA, said.
The new tests constitute phase two of a plan to improve
security around airport perimeters, which are of particular
concern because people could position themselves outside
airports with shoulder-fired missiles, known as man-portable
air defense systems, officials said.
The airports taking part in the pilot programs are Logan
in Boston, JFK International Airport in New York, Denver
International Airport in Colorado, Orlando International
Airport in Florida and the Salt Lake City International
Airport in Utah. At Logan, the TSA and the Massachusetts
Port Authority will test an advanced water perimeter intrusion
detection system, which can identify authorized people
near active runways.
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, along
with TSA, will test a barrier-free boundary surrounding
a cargo warehouse at JFK airport. People who are authorized
to enter the secure area will have a personal radio-frequency
identification card and will need to have their fingerprint
scanned prior to gaining access. In addition, the TSA
will deploy a state-of-the-art video surveillance system
to monitor access.
Working with Greater Orlando Aviation Authority, the
TSA will test equipment to monitor access of vehicles
into secure areas of the airport at Orlando International
Airport. The TSA will analyze the use of a dual iris scan
recognition reader at a vehicle access gate to allow only
authorized personnel through.
Denver International Airport will test a barrier-free
boundary surrounding a cargo warehouse at the airport
using technology including ultrasonic emitters and microwave
sensors. In this test, everyone authorized to enter the
secure area will have to have their fingerprint scanned
prior to entry. An advanced video surveillance system
will also be installed to monitor access.
Salt Lake City Department of Airports will focus on
enhancing access control to the baggage area entrance,
which is part of the non-public, secure side of the airport.
The technologies will include a hand geometry reader and
a video motion surveillance analysis system to prevent
personnel from piggybacking through the door.
The TSA said the technologies will be tested to determine
both their effectiveness and their impact on airport operations.
TSA will collect and share data on the technologies with
the industry so they may utilize it for future projects. |
CRAWFORD, Texas (Reuters)
- President Bush on Monday pressed Saudi Arabia to take
steps to relieve record-high oil prices, but the world's
largest exporter insisted global supplies were adequate.
Bush met Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah at his Texas ranch
as consumer worries about soaring U.S. gasoline prices
weighed on the president's job approval ratings.
"The crown prince understands that it is very
important ... (to) make sure that the price is reasonable.
A high oil price will damage markets, and he knows that,"
Bush told reporters before welcoming Abdullah at his
Texas ranch.
"We'll
talk about his country's capacity. It's an important
subject," Bush said. Saudi Arabia is the biggest
producer within the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries.
"This is an important relationship,"
Bush said. He greeted the prince, who is in his early
eighties, with a kiss on both cheeks and then firmly
held his hand to guide him up the stone steps leading
to the office on the president's ranch.
The White House is facing growing consumer unease over
oil prices that have marched steadily higher during
the past year, reflecting the rising demand for energy
in China and India and little new global production.
But
Adel al-Jubeir, Saudi foreign affairs adviser, said
while the current price of oil was too high, his country's
energy policies remained consistent and unchanged.
"Our policy is to ensure that the markets are
adequately supplied. We have been doing so in the past.
We are doing so now. We will do so in the future,"
he said.
U.S. crude oil prices hit record highs in April, briefly
topping $58 a barrel. Nationwide retail gasoline prices
have climbed to $2.28 a gallon (3.8 litres).
"There is no shortage of crude oil in the market
today, what we see is a shortage of refining capacity,"
Jubeir said.
Democrats criticized the Bush administration's energy
policy. "It is wrong that the president has let
our national energy policy go so awry that he is asking
a foreign prince for favors," Rep. Edward Markey,
a Massachusetts Democrat said in a statement. |
Dr. Ashraf Al Kurdi
was former Palestinian Authority president Yasser Arafat's
physician for over 25 years.
Q: The U.S. press has insinuated that Yasser Arafat
was a homosexual who died of AIDS. Are you aware of this?
A: I heard rumors he died of AIDS, but not rumors that
he was a homosexual. I have done the HIV tests many times
before on Arafat as a routine test. It was never positive.
Q: When was the last time you did a test?
A: About six months before he died. The Tunisian doctors
told me they did this test in Ramallah and it was normal.
Q: Did Arafat have any longstanding health problems?
A: No, apart from the benign, nonessential tremor which
manifests as a tremor in the lips and hands. He never
had anything else.
Q: Did he have Parkinson's Disease?
A: Actually, this was investigated many times. No. It
was the tremor only. He was tested many times for Parkinson’s.
Q: How long had you been Arafat's primary physician?
A: More than 25 years.
Q: You treated him after the plane crash in Libya?
A: Yes. We saved his life from bilateral subdural hematoma.
This produced changes in his mental state and his physical
appearance. He developed hemoplegia and when we caught
it he was operated on in Amman.
Q: Could this cause any later medical condition?
A: No complications whatsoever. The operation went very
smooth and was done by an ordinary neurosurgeon.
Q: Before you saw him the last time, had he had regular
checkups?
A: Yes, of course.
Q: Arafat complained of stomach pain, could this indicate
something?
A: No. He had abdominal pain from time to time, but not
constant. A gastrointestinal gastroscopy showed a mild
irritation.
Q: In the year prior to his death, how often had you
seen him?
A: I was called on the sixteenth day after his illness,
and when I went there I saw a group of Tunisian doctors
sent by his wife to Ramallah without calling me. These
people never had any idea about Arafat's health -- never
saw Arafat before. I saw four Egyptian doctors and three
Palestinian doctors. After I went
to Ramallah with my group, I went straight to see him.
There were signs of poisoning, manifested by a reddish
patch on his face and a metallic, yellow color to his
skin.
Q: Did any of these other doctors ask you about his medical
history? Have you heard from them since?
A: No, they didn't consult me. Nobody talked to me and
none of them knew his health before, except one of the
Egyptians.
Q: Have you been contacted since
for your opinion?
A: No. No, there were strict instructions
not to contact me by his wife, according to Palestinian
Authority leaders.
Q: How many checkups did he get in the year before his
death?
A: Three times.
Q: Was he in good health?
A: Yes, he was perfectly healthy. But I must stress that
I was called officially on the sixteenth day of his illness,
not at the beginning, so we can't know exactly when it
started. This is a very important point. I told Suha Arafat
that by sending the Tunisian doctors, you delayed treatment
on your husband. A gap of five or six days.
Q: Did you ask the PA leaders about this long delay?
A: There was no good answer -- no one dared to say anything.
I was told that Suha refused me access. Why, I don't know.
When I saw him, I decided he must go abroad because there
were tests he needed that couldn't be done in Ramallah.
There was contact with the French and their response was
immediate. They sent a plane and the Jordanians sent two
helicopters to take him to Amman. Nobody offered me to
go with him to Paris, and whenever I asked after him,
I never got a satisfactory reply. Again, because of one
person, probably his wife.
Q: What was his appearance the last time you saw him
alive?
A: He lost half of his body weight. He had this reddish
spot covering his face, and his coloring was metallic
yellow. He was conscious, talking and joking, even. His
cognitive functions were perfect. After that I asked all
the doctors to meet. We concluded he had platelet deficiency.
Some of the causes for this were not clear, so I asked
he be transferred to Paris as soon as possible. But even
the French doctors didn't ask me for his previous history.
Q: Did Arafat know he was dying?
A: Yes. Yes, actually I heard from
him in Ramallah, that he thought he'd been poisoned.
Q: Did he say who or why or how?
A: No.
Q: Last September 25th, 2003, there was an illness that
some PA leaders in the Muqata said marked the start of
his physical decline. What do you think?
A: I don't think so, because I went with a team to Ramallah
from Jordan to investigate all known types of poisons.
We took blood samples and there were no poisons, or HIV
infection.
Q: According to Islamic law, when the
cause of death is questionable, an autopsy is required?
A: That is absolutely true. I requested
four things: a committee to investigate his health and
the progression of his illness. I wanted all results of
the Paris tests and to see the French doctors. I asked
for cause of death and if it was not identified to perform
an autopsy.
Q: Considering that Yasser Arafat was
a major world figure for half a century, shouldn't an
autopsy have been demanded? Why was it denied? Who denied
it?
A: All of them. All the leadership, those
with him in Paris and Chairman Mahmoud Abbas. He said
there is no need, he is already buried. I said, "It’s
not up to you."
Q: Did you feel Abbas made the decision alone or was
it a committee decision?
A: I don't know.
Q: When you said publicly you thought he'd been poisoned,
did you get threats?
A: No. The PA said I should communicate this to them,
which I had done from the first.
Q: Some news accounts said the French government would
be upset by an autopsy?
A: This is very stupid, I don't think this would upset
them. If someone dies of unknown
causes, it is mandatory to have an autopsy -- mandatory!
They know the regulations. Here in Jordan, bodies have
been exhumed many times in criminal cases.
Q: Is there a time limit to exhuming a body to trace
forensic causes?
A: It depends on the agents used. I suspect Arafat died
of a "killing poison", a catalyst. The death
was due to this.
* Trish Schuh who conducted this interview is a freelance
journalist who has worked for ABC News, Al Arabiya.net,
Muslim's Weekly and The Indypendent. She studied Islam
and Arabic at Bir Zeit University in Palestine. The interview
was conducted in Amman Jordan on January 18, 2005 and
published today in the Tehran Times. |
GAZA, April 25 (Xinhuanet)
-- The Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas)
warned the United States on Monday against any attempt
to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.
Hamas spokesman Mushir Al-Masri told reporters that
any US resolution recognizing Jerusalem as the united
and eternal capital of Israel will blow up all efforts
to observe calmness in the Palestinian territories.
Days ago, the US Congress discussed
a draft resolution that asked the US administration
to recognize Jerusalem as the united and eternal capital
of Israel before recognizing any possible Palestinian
state.
Masri said the US administration will have to be blamed
for any such step that will break the de facto truce
that Hamas and other militant groups agreed to abide
by till the year end.
Masri stressed that Jerusalem is the Palestinians'
sacred city and the capital of the future Palestinian
state.
"We will not accept less than this at any time,"
he warned.
He also accused the United States of being unfair
and biased in its position on the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict, saying that US President George W. Bush has
promised Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to retain
large settlement blocs in the West Bank under any future
peace agreement.
The Palestinians want the Gaza Strip and the West
Bank for an independent and viable state with Jerusalem
as its capital. |
An elderly man was
seriously injured when a group of settlers of Alon Moreh
settlement hurled stones at him and severely beat him
as he was herding his sheep on his land near the settlement.
Aziz Hanani, 70, from Beit Dajan near Nablus, said
that he was attacked by five settlers who stole his
cane and beat him with it for approximately twenty minutes,
causing serious injuries, mainly to his head.
Hanani added that three of the settlers also hurled
stones at him during the attack.
A tractor driver passing near the area later on, saw
Hanani laying on the ground, and took him to his home,
where he was transferred by ambulance to a local hospital
in Nablus.
A nephew of Hanani said that his uncle suffers from
diabetes.
“This is unbelievable, intolerable, we are living
on our land, taking care of our fields, we never attacked
anybody, never harmed anybody, yet they attack us with
this brutality”, the nephew added.
Abu Akram, a resident of the village called the Israeli
police about the attack. The police department dispatched
one police car one hour after they were informed on
the attack, and made no effort to track down the settlers
involved in the attack.
“If a settler was attacked, and mildly injured,
the police would have arrived immediately and attacked
our village, but since the injured man is a Palestinian,
they showed up an hour after the attack”, the
resident said.
Also, Abu Akram added that the police said that they
would investigate the event, but similar promises in
the past have rarely been followed up on by Israeli
police. The police took a statement from Hanani, who
informed them that he would be able to easily identify
at least one of the settlers, the most violent of his
attackers.
Settlers of Itamar and Alon Moreh settlement have carried
out several attacks against Palestinian residents in
Nablus area.
The residents demanded that the Israeli police act
against the increasing numbers of settler attacks against
unarmed Palestinians. |
RAMALLAH - Two organizations,
concerned in prisoners affairs, confirmed that the Palestinian
female and child prisoners in Israeli prison "Talmond"
suffer miserable health conditions.
Two lawyers of "Mandela", Rateb Mhaisen and
Nazih Abu al-Tin, who visited prisoners last Wednesday,
said that female prisoners and children complaint of
daily practices and health deterioration.
Mohaissen, who visited 8 female prisoners, said that
they live in harsh and non healthy conditions, according
to a joint press release issued by "Mandela Association"
and "the Palestinian Legal Aid Fund".
He said that the (female) prisoners live in bad-smell
crowded rooms lack of air and sun ray. Mohaisen said
that several women prisoners suffer diseases and live
between insects.
"Lina Farajallah, from Hebron, suffers hepatitis
and chronic headache but she receives no medicine,"
Mohaisen said in the press release. The press releases
included several cases who suffer different kinds of
diseases such as leukemia and dermatitis and others
who suffer wounds.
In the press release Mohaissen also mentioned to several
cases were women were harshly physically and psychologically
tortured and lived in solitary confinement.
For his part, Lawyer Abu al-Tin, who visited children
prisoners in Talmond said that the Israeli jailers deliberately
daily terrify and provoke children. Children told him
that the jailers storm their rooms with dogs, cut electric
power and procrastinate access medicine.
Beside the little amount of food and bad health conditions
the administration of the prison prevent their families
from visiting them, Abu al-Tin said.
Wissam Hoshiyah, from Jenin suffers fungal and dermatitis
while Nasser Rodwan, from Qalqiliya suffers kidney stone.
Several others suffer diseases and receive no medics.
The lawyer pointed out to several cases where children
were tortured and lived in solitary confinement. |
The Perversions of
Daniel Okrent
A little over a week ago, some members of our organization,
If
Americans Knew, met with New York Times Public Editor
Daniel Okrent to discuss the findings of a detailed
study we had completed of two years worth of Times news
stories on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Okrent
was going to be writing a column discussing the paper’s
coverage of Israel/Palestine, and we felt our study
would be an important resource.
Using a PowerPoint presentation, we explained our findings
and gave him copies of the 23-page report, along with
approximately 40 pages of supporting documentation.
In order to find as clear and objective a measure as
possible, our studies examine how news organizations
report deaths among both populations, Israelis and Palestinian.
Basically, we simply count the deaths reported on both
sides of the conflict, and then compare these to the
actual number of deaths that had occurred. It is our
view that all deaths are equally tragic regardless of
race, religion, or ethnicity; we hoped that the Times
shared that perspective.
Findings
Our statistical analysis of their
coverage, however, showed that there was startling disparity
in how deaths were reported, depending on the ethnicity
of the victim.
For example, we found that in 2004,
at a time when 8 Israeli children and 176 Palestinian
children were killed – a ratio of 1 to 22 –
Times headlines and lead paragraphs reported on Israeli
children’s deaths at a rate almost seven times
greater than Palestinian children’s deaths.
A one-month sub-study indicated that this disparity
grew even larger when the entire article was analyzed,
with Israeli children’s
deaths mentioned (through repetitions of deaths
reported on previous days) at
a rate ten times greater than Palestinian children’s
deaths.
Times coverage of deaths of all ages, while less dramatically
skewed, showed similar distortion. In the first year
of the current Palestinian uprising, which began in
fall of 2000, we discovered that the Times reported
prominently on 42 percent of Palestinian deaths, and
on 119 percent of Israeli deaths (follow-up headline
articles, we find, frequently push coverage of Israeli
deaths over 100 percent). In other words,
the Times reported Israeli deaths at a rate approximately
three times greater than Palestinian deaths.
During this period over three times
more Palestinians were being killed than Israelis.
Overall, we found that in every single category Times
coverage reported Israeli deaths at rates three or more
times greater than Palestinian deaths.
Such patterns of distortion
gave readers the impression that equal numbers of people
on both sides were being killed – or that more
Israelis were being killed – when the reality
is that Palestinians have always been killed in far
greater numbers. In particular, we found that
Times stories so often repeated reports of Israeli children’s
deaths that in some periods they were reporting on Israeli
deaths at a rate of 400 percent.
In contrast, the majority of Palestinian
deaths – particularly children’s deaths
– were never reported by the Times at all.
According to Israeli human rights groups and others
who assiduously gather data on all children killed in
the conflict, at least 82 Palestinian
children were killed before any Israeli children were
killed – and the
largest single cause of these Palestinian children’s
deaths was “gunfire to the head.”
Yet, almost no one is aware of this, since Times coverage
consistently omitted or minimized coverage of these
Palestinian deaths.
In other words, we found that New York Times coverage
of Israel-Palestine exhibited highly disturbing patterns
of bias.
To make matters worse, since the Times
is often considered “the newspaper of record,”
with hundreds of newspapers subscribing to the New York
Times News Service, the paper’s distortions become
replicated throughout the country.
Unintentionally, editors around the country are reporting
this issue with a distortion based on ethnicity that
most would oppose, if they were aware that they were
doing it.
New York Times Reaction
We presented these findings, complete with charts,
spread-sheets, clear sourcing, and extensive additional
documentation, to Okrent and his assistant. We gave
him the names and details of 32 Palestinian children
who had been killed during the first month of the uprising
– none of whom had been the subject of Times’
articles. (28 of these children, it was found, had
been killed by gunfire to the head or chest.)
Okrent appeared to accept our findings readily –
even commenting at one of our findings that he "wasn’t
surprised."
His subsequent column, purporting
to examine Times coverage of Israel-Palestine, given
all of the above, is perplexing. There is no mention
whatsoever of our report, no mention of our two-year
study, no mention of the 40-some pages of supporting
evidence, no mention, even, of our lengthy face-to-face
meeting (despite the fact that it appears we were one
of the few groups to present our information in person).
In his 1,762-word column, there are a total of three
mentions of us.
One is an off-hand sentence claiming that we “say”
that the Times “ignores” the deaths of Palestinian
children, whom, we “say” are often shot
in the head or chest by Israeli soldiers. Instead of
this loose, somewhat flawed paraphrase, Okrent could
simply have quoted our report directly, perhaps even
mentioning our substantial evidence. One wonders why
he didn’t.
A second reference, potentially damaging, significantly
misrepresents what we said. (We have phoned the Times
asking for a correction and space for rebuttal to Okrent’s
allegations.)
In his column, Okrent writes: “During my research,
representatives of If Americans Knew expressed the belief
that unless the paper assigned equal numbers of Muslim
and Jewish reporters to cover the conflict, Jewish reporters
should be kept off the beat. I find this profoundly
offensive.”
Actually, Okrent is referring to his own words at the
meeting, not ours. Let us tell you the complete version.
It is quite illuminating.
Even before we had finished presenting our findings,
Okrent interrupted to ask us why there was such distortion
in Times coverage, what was causing the bias. He asked
what we would suggest doing about it.
I replied that I wondered if there was a lack of diversity
in the reporters and editors working on the issue. I
pointed out that since this was a conflict between a
state whose identity and purpose of existence was to
be a Jewish state, it seemed to me that the number of
Jewish-American reporters covering it should be balanced
by approximately an equal number of Arab/Muslim-American
reporters, or that there be reporters and editors working
on it – for example, Asian-American or African-American
journalists – without predisposition to partisanship
toward either side.
Okrent said that it was impossible to find equal numbers
of Arab/Muslim journalists of sufficiently high quality
to balance out the number of Jewish reporters available
to cover it, and ignored the suggestion that other groups
be included in the reportorial/editorial pool. He said
that there shouldn’t be an “ethnic litmus
test” and that Jewish reporters shouldn’t
be excluded just because there weren’t enough
Muslims for the Times to employ. I agreed with him that
there should not be a litmus test, and then asked him
if he thought only Jewish reporters could cover it.
No, he said, the problem, he felt,
was that Times reporters only lived in Israel and didn’t
live in the Palestinian territories. He then said that
when he had suggested to reporters that they also live
in the West Bank or Gaza, a person he “trusted”
told him that this was too dangerous; they would be
kidnapped. I then said that he needed to reconsider
the reliability of this anonymous person, since I myself
had traveled throughout Gaza and the West Bank as a
freelance reporter without any danger from the Palestinian
population.
Finally, I said that fundamentally it was up to the
Times to figure out how to improve their system of reporting
– that I only saw the results. I said that we
had provided free outside consultation, had found patterns
I was sure they would find as disturbing as we did,
and that it was now up to the Times to determine and
remedy the cause.
Overall, I found this exchange bizarre. We had expected
some questions about our study, its methodology, what
additional patterns we had noticed, etc. Almost none
of this took place. On the other hand, we came away
with the very strong impression that Okrent, who is
himself Jewish, felt basically that only Jewish reporters
could cover this issue and that, while their reporting
would be more accurate if some of them lived in the
West Bank or Gaza, they probably wouldn’t do this
because it would be too dangerous for them (despite
the fact that such Jewish Israeli journalists as Amira
Haas have lived there for years).
The fact that it could be both possible and valuable
to have additional ethnic groups involved in covering
this issue, including some without ethnic connection
to this ethnic dispute, seemed incomprehensible to him.
Finally, we were astounded at
his assumption that it would be impossible for the Times
to find sufficient numbers of high quality journalists
of Muslim or Arab heritage to work on this issue.
Still disturbed at the oddness of this meeting, afterwards
I sent a follow-up email again explaining my view. I
will print it below:
Email to Dan Okrent
Dear Dan,
Thank you for meeting with us, and for your willingness
to take on what is certainly one of the most volatile
issues in the news today -- and one of the most urgent.
I hope our study will help alert the New York Times
to patterns of omission that I'm sure you find as disturbing
as we do.
Regarding your important question about what changes
I would suggest: Truthfully, it is difficult for me
to offer solutions, since I only see the results, and
have no idea what the internal dynamics are of the Times'
reporting and editing that have created these patterns.
It seems to me that news organizations themselves, once
alerted to flaws in their coverage, are in the best
position to undertake thorough analyses of the causation,
and then to implement whatever changes are required.
I suspect that your idea that coverage would improve
greatly if reporters lived in the West Bank and Gaza
as well as Israel is quite correct.
One possibility, of course, is that the Times could
hire some of the excellent Palestinian journalists living
in these areas. When I visited Birzeit University a
few months ago, I met a professor and a number of students
in the journalism department that I found quite impressive.
I haven't visited any journalism departments in Gaza,
but I did visit some classes in American literature
at Islamic University in Gaza City in 2001, and found
a level of teaching equivalent to the finest in US universities.
At the same time, of course, it is important that
those editing these reports be as unpartisan as possible
-- which, I suspect, requires that those in this position
have diverse backgrounds. While I'm not Jewish, I can
imagine similar situations in which I might believe
that I had arrived at a neutral position, not realizing
that I was still influenced by what my mother had believed,
or what my aunt would say, or the narrative I had absorbed
as a child -- in other words, I might write and edit
within parameters that would interfere with the accuracy
of my work.
Finally, below is some more recent information about
the disturbing -- and unreported, in the Times -- pattern
of Israeli forces shooting and abusing children and
other civilians.
1. Here is the link to the Remember These Children
information: http://www.rememberthesechildren.org/remember2000.html.
Again, please note the high number of young people shot
in the head, neck, and chest in 2004 and 2005. Please
ask Mr. Erlanger why Times' readers have not learned
of these patterns. At least 29 Palestinian children
have already been killed through March of this year,
and one Israeli child. As you know, several more Palestinian
young people have been killed this month.
2. The fact that Israeli forces have been targeting
children and civilians has been noted in diverse reports.
For example, Physicians for Human Rights reported: "Physicians
for Human Rights analysis of fatal gunshot wounds in
Gaza reveals that approximately 50% were to the head.
This high proportion of fatal head wounds suggests that
given broad rules of engagement, soldiers are specifically
aiming at peoples' heads." Following are a few
of the excellent and thorough articles on this topic
that have appeared in the Israeli press, and some of
the human rights reports on this topic.
Gideon Levy article from Ha’aretz, "Suffer
the Little Children": http://www.dcipal.org/english/
Another Gideon Levy article (I highly recommend his
column 'twilight zone'): http://www.jerusalemites.org/
Defence for Children International report: "Status
of Palestinian Children's Rights" … http://www.dcipal.org/english/
Report on child prisoners: http://www.dcipal.org/
3. I understand that Times reporters are reluctant
to spend much time in the West Bank and Gaza. Nevertheless,
I would like to offer to personally take Times reporters
to visit Palestinian hospitals to verify the high number
of young people being shot by Israeli forces. In return,
it would be excellent if Times' reporters would then
take me to visit Israeli prisons, so that we might investigate
the conditions in which Palestinian prisoners -- particularly
children -- are being kept.
Again, thanks for your time. It was nice seeing you
again -- it has certainly resurrected many memories
of Ann Arbor and The Michigan Daily.
Best Wishes,
Alison
Okrent's Admission
(As the last sentence of this email indicates, Dan
Okrent and I were friends and fellow student journalists
many years ago.)
In his column, Okrent makes one other statement purportedly
about us, but that actually seems to be a veiled confession:
“I don't think any of us can be objective about
our own claimed objectivity.” Given that admission,
it seems that it would have been appropriate for Okrent
to at least note the existence of our statistical study,
so that his readers could examine our findings for themselves.
Truthfully, however, it is not rare for newspapers
to cover up negative information about their organization,
and for their ombudsmen to participate in the attempt
to suppress such information.
Fortunately, however, the internet provides an increasingly
effective counter to such media censorship; this study,
and others, are all available for viewing and downloading
from our website:
We hope that anyone who feels Americans should be accurately
informed on all topics – including Israel-Palestine
– will tell others about these studies. |
Yemen's military intelligence chief Brig. Ali Sayani
survived an assassination attempt in Sanaa Monday. Several
civilians, however, were at least wounded in this incident.
Daily Rai News quoted a Yemeni security source as saying
the attacker tossed a hand grenade inside Sayani's car,
but his bodyguards managed to throw it back before it
detonated. According to this report, the attacker and
a number of passersby were injured and rushed to the
hospital. Another report said a bystander was killed
after the assailant missed the intended target.
The attack took place near the Central Customs office
and close to the Italian embassy. |
SECURITY chiefs fear Al-Qaeda terrorists trained as
scuba divers could mount attacks against a royal review
of the fleet being held to mark the 200th anniversary
of the battle of Trafalgar.
A senior Ministry of Defence (MoD) police officer
has disclosed that militants using techniques learnt
in western diving schools to attack Royal Navy ships
are considered the main threat to the event.
Officials
fear Al-Qaeda divers could attach bombs to the hulls
of the ships, detonate explosives strapped to their
bodies in suicide attacks or even board vessels and
kill some of those on board.
The Queen, in her office as Lord High Admiral, will
review about 40 ships from the navies of nations including
France and Spain. She will be on the deck of one of
the Royal Navy ships. [...]
The 3,000-5,000 private yachts and small boats expected
to gather in the Solent to watch the review will be
kept away from the naval vessels in the main channel.
There will be a 200m exclusion
zone around the naval ships and strict rules preventing
“fast planing boats” from sailing at anything above
minimum speed. Although that rule was ostensibly
imposed to reduce the danger from wash, security sources
have said it is designed to prevent terrorists using
fast boats to mount bomb attacks similar to those carried
out by Al-Qaeda on a US ship off the coast of Yemen
in October 2000.
Small boats taking part in the Spithead review will
be kept back against the shore away from the main route
by marshals. Privately, however, officials admit it
will be almost impossible to control the number of small
boats attending and there will be no attempt to impose
a pass system.
The MoD police’s marine units and Hampshire police,
who are responsible for security at the review, will
concentrate on maintaining the exclusion zone round
the fleet, although all boats will have access to other
parts of the Solent.
They believe the only way terrorists
will be able to get through the security cordon would
be underwater, which is why the threat from terrorist
divers linked to Al-Qaeda is taken seriously.
One senior MoD police officer said: “It is something
that really concerns us and has done for some time.
The potential is obviously there. It presents a very
difficult problem for the officers on patrol.”
Bruce Jones, chairman of a Nato security policy group,
said the use of sub-aqua techniques fitted the Al-Qaeda
modus operandi.
“Scuba-diving is fairly user-friendly,” he said. “It’s
not high-technology and it’s not expensive. It is the
type of thing a deep-cover Al-Qaeda cell could manage
fairly easily.” |
WASHINGTON, April
26 (Xinhuanet) -- US President George W. Bush and his
top aides are weighing a tougher approach, including funneling
more money to foundations and business and political groups
opposed to President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, the New
York Times reported Tuesday.
The Bush administration has already begun to urge Venezuela's
neighbors to distance themselves from Chavez and to raise
concerns about press freedoms, judicial independence and
the Venezuelan government's affinity for leftist groups
abroad, including Colombian guerrillas.
But Washington has found no allies so far in its attempts
to isolate the Venezuelan leader, a by-lined story in
the New York Times said.
On Sunday, Chavez ended a 35-year military cooperation
agreement and ordered out four American military instructors
he accused of fomenting unrest.
The accusation, which American officials denied, was
the latestblow to relations that had been bitter since
the US tacitly supported a coup that briefly ousted Chavez
in April 2002, the article said.
Differences between Washington and Caracas increased
constantly since Chavez took the helm of Venezuela. He
openly challenges the "capitalist" and "new
freedom" ideologies of the United States andopposes
Washington's promotion efforts for a free trade area of
the Americas.
The United States believes the close relations Caracas
has beenpursuing with countries like Cuba, Iran and Libya
have formed threats to its security.
However, the New York Times' article said that a main
problem for the United States is that Washington has little,
if any, influence over Caracas. The high price of oil
has left Venezuela with no need for the loans or other
aid that the Untied States could use as leverage. |
CARACAS,
Venezuela (AP) - President Hugo Chavez says a longstanding
military exchange program with the United States was
cancelled because U.S. officers
in Venezuela were attempting to turn the soldiers they
were training against his government.
Chavez also announced the brief detention of several
Americans and said the United States might be planning
to invade his country.
The U.S. Embassy on Friday said Venezuela had abruptly
and without explanation ended the 35-year-old military
exchange program. Ambassador William Brownfield said
the five U.S. officers in Venezuela involved in the
program had been notified.
Some 90 Venezuelan military personnel were in the
United States as part of the program, the embassy said.
It was not clear how they would be affected.
During his weekly television and radio show, Chavez
complained the U.S. officers "are sent here to turn
our boys against us."
"It's best that they leave, until someday we can have
transparent, clear relations and co-operation with the
civil and military institutions of the United States,
the way we do with almost all governments in the planet,"
Chavez said Sunday.
Chavez said that a woman in
the U.S. armed forces had been detained by authorities
while taking pictures of military installations in central
Venezuela. He did not identify her or say whether
she had been released.
"If she or any other U.S. official does this kind
of activity again, they will be imprisoned and face
trial in Venezuela," he said.
Chavez also said several American
journalists were detained taking pictures of a refinery
about 100 kilometres west of Caracas. He did
not elaborate except to say they were released.
Chavez said the cases indicated the U.S. might be
planning to invade Venezuela.
Venezuela is a top U.S. oil supplier, but tensions
have risen due to U.S. criticism of Venezuela's purchase
of 100,000 assault rifles from Russia, and Chavez's
criticism of the U.S. occupation of Iraq.
Chavez accuses Washington of being behind a brief
2002 coup against him and of supporting other plots
to oust him. Washington denies the allegation although
it was slow to condemn the coup. |
Confidential
letter reveals Ratzinger ordered bishops to keep allegations
secret
Pope Benedict XVI faced claims last night he had 'obstructed
justice' after it emerged he issued an order ensuring
the church's investigations into child sex abuse claims
be carried out in secret.
The order was made in a confidential letter, obtained
by The Observer, which was sent to every Catholic bishop
in May 2001.
It asserted the church's right
to hold its inquiries behind closed doors and keep the
evidence confidential for up to 10 years after the victims
reached adulthood. The
letter was signed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, who
was elected as John Paul II's successor last week.
Lawyers acting for abuse victims claim it was designed
to prevent the allegations from becoming public knowledge
or being investigated by the police. They accuse Ratzinger
of committing a 'clear obstruction of justice'.
The letter, 'concerning very grave sins', was sent
from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,
the Vatican office that once presided over the Inquisition
and was overseen by Ratzinger.
It spells out to bishops the church's position on
a number of matters ranging from celebrating the eucharist
with a non-Catholic to sexual abuse by a cleric 'with
a minor below the age of 18 years'. Ratzinger's
letter states that the church can claim jurisdiction
in cases where abuse has been 'perpetrated with a minor
by a cleric'.
The letter states that the church's jurisdiction 'begins
to run from the day when the minor has completed the
18th year of age' and lasts for 10 years.
It orders that 'preliminary investigations' into any
claims of abuse should be sent to Ratzinger's office,
which has the option of referring them back to private
tribunals in which the 'functions of judge, promoter
of justice, notary and legal representative can validly
be performed for these cases only by priests'.
'Cases of this kind are subject to the pontifical
secret,' Ratzinger's letter concludes. Breaching
the pontifical secret at any time while the 10-year
jurisdiction order is operating carries penalties, including
the threat of excommunication.
The letter is referred to in documents relating to
a lawsuit filed earlier this year against a church in
Texas and Ratzinger on behalf of two alleged abuse victims.
By sending the letter, lawyers acting for the alleged
victims claim the cardinal conspired to obstruct justice.
[...] |
NEW YORK - Nike has just done it. Almost 10 years after
allegations first surfaced that Nike's contractors were
exploiting workers in Asian sweatshops, the world's
biggest athletic-shoemaker has responded - and how.
In a 108-page report the company, based in Beaverton,
Oregon, presented a surprisingly frank audit of labour
conditions at 569 of 830 factories worldwide where Nike-branded
footwear, apparel and sports equipment are made.
Nike's "corporate responsibility" report doesn't make
for a pretty picture. From excessively
long work weeks and wrong wage calculations to verbal
abuse and curbs on toilet visits, the findings confirm
a pervasive culture of exploitation. At risk
are as many as 650,000 workers in factories located
from Australia and China to the US and Vietnam. Most
of them are women aged between 19 and 25.
So has Nike scored a self-goal by publishing the report?
Chairman Philip Knight's candour is probably backed
by sound business acumen.
An honest acknowledgment of lax labour standards is
a much required first step to make labour-rights activists
and the media appreciate the sweatshop problem for what
it is: an industry-wide menace that was neither created
by Nike nor can be solved by it in isolation. |
SAN
JOSE, Calif. (AP) - Police investigating how a human
finger ended up in a woman's bowl of Wendy's chili declared
the claim a hoax Friday and arrested her on charges
of attempted grand larceny.
The arrest of Anna Ayala at her home outside Las Vegas
was the latest twist in a case that has become a late-night
punch line, taken a bite out of Wendy's sales and forced
the fast-food chain to check its employees for missing
fingers.
Ayala, 39, claimed she bit down on the well-manicured,
four-centimetre finger in a mouthful of her steamy chili
on March 22 in San Jose. She had hired a lawyer and
filed a claim against the Wendy's franchise owner, but
dropped the lawsuit threat soon after suspicion fell
on her.
When asked whether police considered
Ayala's claim a hoax, David Keneller, captain of the
San Jose police department's investigations bureau,
said yes.
"What we have found is that thus far our evidence
suggests the truest victims in this case are indeed
the Wendy's owner, operators and employees here in San
Jose," police Chief Rob Davis said.
At a news conference, police refused to say where
the finger came from and exactly how the hoax was carried
out.
But according to a person knowledgeable about the
case who spoke on condition of anonymity, the attempted
larceny charge stemmed from San Jose police interviews
with people who said Ayala described putting a finger
in the chili. The source said the interviews were with
at least two people who did not know each other and
independently told similar stories.
The source added that investigators still did not know
where the finger came from.
Ayala - who has a history of
bringing claims against big corporations - has
denied placing the finger in the chili.
"We're thrilled that an arrest has been made," Tom
Mueller, president and chief operating officer of Wendy's
North America, said in a statement. [...] |
DAYTON,
Ohio - A man is suing a fast-food restaurant operator
for more than $50,000, claiming he found a slice of
skin on his chicken sandwich.
David Scheiding filed the lawsuit in Montgomery County
Common Pleas Court on April 1 after rejecting a settlement
offer from GZK Inc., his lawyer said. GZK owns the Arby's
restaurant in Tipp City where he bought the sandwich.
Scheiding said he realized something wasn't right
when he bit into the sandwich on June 18 and found a
piece of flesh about three-fourths of an inch long.
"It looked like I was seeing fingerprints
on it," he said. "I got sick and went to the bathroom."
Miami County health investigators talked to the restaurant
manager, who had a bandage on his right thumb and wore
a latex glove, according to a health district report.
The manager said he sliced skin
from the thumb while shredding lettuce, and sanitized
the area but didn't throw away the bin of lettuce,
the report said. Scheiding's sandwich contained lettuce.
"Why wasn't the food searched, and why wasn't it thrown
away?" said Scheiding's lawyer, Hank Hyde.
Christine Koeller, vice president of marketing and
communications with GZK, said what happened was unintentional.
"(The manager) did destroy product that was in and
around the slicer immediately, and did everything that
he thought was appropriate to do," Koeller said. |
COBOURG, ONT. - Firefighters managed to control a huge
blaze at a factory in southern Ontario Monday night
and hundreds of people were allowed to return home.
Crews from at least four fire departments had been battling
the fire since mid-afternoon at the Horizon Plastics
plant in Cobourg, about 100 kilometres east of Toronto.
The town declared a state of emergency in early evening
and asked hundreds – perhaps thousands – of people to
leave their homes and businesses, fearing toxic fumes.
[...] |
A RUSSIAN-made cargo plane arriving from Dubai swerved
off the runway at Kabul airport in Afghanistan on Monday
morning and burst into flames, injuring five crew members,
an official told AFP.
"During landing one of its tires burst and the plane
slid off the runway catching fire," Mohammed Qasim Jarar,
director of Kabul Airport, told AFP after the Antonov
AN-12 crash landed.
"But we were able to respond to it very quickly. Five
of the crew members were slightly injured and one survived
unharmed," he added.
No one was killed and the injured people have been
taken to hospital for treatment, Jarar said. |
COMOX,
B.C. (CP) - Two pilots died when a small cargo plane
crashed Friday as it tried to make an emergency landing
at CFB Comox on Vancouver Island.
Bill Yearwood, a spokesman for the Transportation
Safety Board, said it appears an engine fire aboard
the twin-engine Piper Navaho may have caused the fatal
accident. The names of the pilots have not been released.
The Transportation Safety Board, the RCMP, and Canadian
Forces were conducting investigations into the crash.
The airport is used by both military and civilian aircraft.
Authorities say the plane came down just shy of the
runway around 7:30 a.m. |
A flight instructor and his student were killed yesterday
when their small plane crashed and burst into flames
near Westchester County Airport, authorities said.
Teacher Isaac Negron, of Hamden, Conn., and student
Lev Naumov, 23, of Yonkers, were killed when the control
tower lost communication with the Cessna 172 at 3:19
p.m. as it was approaching the airport, officials said.
The four-seater was about a quarter of a mile from
a runway at the airport when radar and radio communications
were lost, said Holly Baker, a spokeswoman for the Federal
Aviation Administration.
Local fire officials found the wreckage near Route
120 in North Castle just after 4 p.m.
Negron and Naumov were the only people aboard. [...] |
A FATHER killed when his light plane plummeted into
a paddock north-east of Melbourne yesterday may have
been practising a training manoeuvre.
James Traill, 45, died when the single engine Cessna
150 Aerobat he was piloting crashed at Badger Creek,
near Healesville, about 10.15am.
The Kilsyth man, who was the only person on board,
had flown out of Coldstream Airport shortly before.
Badger Creek residents said they heard the plane "stop
starting" -- a training manoeuvre where planes are intentionally
stalled mid-air and restarted -- moments before the
crash.
Resident Brad Johnson said he saw the plane in vertical
position before the crash.
"Originally I thought it must have been a glider because
there was no noise," Mr Johnson said.
"I didn't actually see it hit the ground. Common sense
would say it was nosediving." |
Two
San Jose men were hurt in the crash of a small plane
this week east of Paso Robles, and one was still in
critical condition Thursday.
David Michelberg, 44, the passenger in the plane,
suffered a possible skull fracture, several facial fractures
and two broken vertebrae in his neck and lower back,
said his wife, Rachel Michelberg.
He underwent neurosurgery Wednesday at Sierra Vista
Regional Medical Center in San Luis Obispo, she said,
after being transferred Tuesday night from Twin Cities
Community Hospital in Templeton.
``It's a mess,'' his wife said. ``He'll be there a
couple weeks on an artificial respirator; he may lose
an eye.'' [...] |
A Lawrence native was among three people killed in a
firefighting plane crash Wednesday in northeastern California.
Brian Bruns, 47, was taking part in a test flight
of a P-3 Orion air tanker that was to be put into service
next month for Aero Union, a company that runs firefighting
flights for the U.S. Forest Service, when the accident
happened.
Bruns' mother, Erma Bruns of Lawrence, said her son
had chosen a treacherous profession, but he found it
rewarding.
"It's very dangerous, but he said it was so gratifying
when you save somebody's home," she said. "He loved
to fly because he felt so close to God." [...]
His mother said authorities had not revealed the cause
of the accident to the family.
"All we know is what we have been told: That they're
still investigating," she said. "We don't know what
caused it." [...]
The plane in the crash was built in 1966 and originally
used in the Navy before being refurbished to serve as
an air tanker. Last May, 33 similar tankers in the federal
firefighting fleet were grounded after safety concerns. |
SAN DIEGO -- The pilot of a small experimental plane
survived a crash Friday that rescuers at first feared
was deadly.
The accident happened near the western side of Otay
Mountain, about 10 miles east of Brown Field, NBC 7/39
reported. From the air, it appeared that the plane hit
the ground hard.
It took rescue workers a little less than an hour
to reach the pilot, who suffered a broken arm and two
broken legs. He was transported to Mercy Hospital.
Officials said the pilot had been flying with another
experimental aircraft when the pilot of the other plane
noticed that the first plane was missing. The pilot
of the plane still flying returned to Brown Field to
report the missing plane to authorities.
The plane is a RV-6 experimental airplane. It is not
yet clear what caused the accident.
|
Albert
`Gus' Wing III died after his legs were severed, DeLand
police say.
A sky diver respected for his decades of experience
and video skills died Saturday afternoon after his legs
were severed in a midair collision with an airplane,
authorities said.
Albert "Gus" Wing III of Longwood was at an altitude
of about 600 feet at about 9:20 a.m. when he crashed
into the left wing of a Twin Otter aircraft, DeLand
police said. Both of Wing's legs were severed at the
knees, police said.
"He managed to maneuver the parachute and land," police
said in a written statement. "The airplane landed safely
and police investigators observed damage to the plane's
left wing."
Wing, 50, was taken to Halifax Medical Center in Daytona
Beach, where he later died. It is unclear whether the
pilot, William Buchmann of DeLand, was injured. [...] |
HONG
KONG (AP) - A moderate earthquake struck off the coast
of Indonesia's Sumatra island early Tuesday, Hong Kong
seismologists said.
The 5.5-magnitude tremor's epicenter was about 370
kilometers (229 miles) west-northwest of the city of
Padang, the Hong Kong Observatory said.
The tremor was recorded in Hong Kong at 4:24 a.m.
(2024 GMT Monday), the observatory said.
It was not immediately known whether the quake caused
any casualties or damage. [...] |
Severe
weather rolled into the area this afternoon, dumping
heavy rain and hail as it moved quickly from west to
east and possibly spawning a tornado in Tarrant County.
Storm spotters said a tornado touched down in the
vicinity of Interstates 20 and 35W. However, Ft. Worth
Fire Lt. Kent Worley said they had not found any confirmed
reports of damage or injury.
A heavy concentration of hail fell on Cedar Hill and
Duncanville in southern Dallas County, accumulating
in some areas and looking almost like snow in several
residents' yards.
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport was reporting
delays of 45 minutes to an hour for most arriving flights
due to the storms, and officials said at least 22 flights
had been canceled as a result. [...] |
WASHINGTON
- A comprehensive survey of Antarctic glaciers shows
the continent is melting worse than thought.
The three-year study by scientists from the British
Antarctic Survey and U.S. Geological Survey used more
than 2,000 aerial and satellite photographs. They
document how 87 per cent of 244 glaciers have retreated
over the past 50 years.
Glacier-ice shelves are floating glaciers that remain
connected to the land, while tidewater glaciers rest
on rock off the ocean.
"These glacier retreat patterns combined with dramatic
ice shelf break-ups leave us in no doubt that the Antarctic
Peninsula ice sheet is extremely sensitive to recent
warming," said British glaciologist David Vaugan.
"What we still need to determine is whether or not
the warming in this area has its roots in human-influenced
global warming," he added in a statement.
Glacier retreat is important to the world's environment
because it could allow more ice to drain further inland,
contributing to a rise in sea levels.
Researchers found atmospheric
temperatures rose more than 2.5 C along the Antarctic
Peninsula, a narrow chain of mountains south
of South America.
In the last half-century, the trend to glacier retreat
moved south toward the mainland, the team found.
The jump in temperatures is
five times the average for Antarctica.
Warmer winds from changes in atmospheric circulation
as well as human-induced climate change could be causing
the glacier retreat.
The study appears in the April 22 issue of the journal
Science |
Hanoi,
Vietnam, -- Public health officials in Vietnam fear
the South Asian outbreak of bird flu is becoming less
virulent and, thus, more likely to spawn a pandemic.
The new fear stems, ironically, from the declining mortality
rates of infected humans, the Washington Post reported
Saturday.
About a year ago some two-thirds of human victims
in Vietnam died, but recently that figure has plunged
by nearly half.
If that trend continues, it
raises the likelihood that infected humans' greater
longevity will result in more people contracting avian
influenza -- and thus increasing the chances it will
become a global problem.
"The virus could be adapting to humans," said Peter
Horby, an epidemiologist with the World Health Organization
in Hanoi, the Vietnamese capital. "There's a number
of indications it could be moving toward a more dangerous
virus."
By way of comparison, the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic
that killed some 40 million people worldwide, had a
5 percent mortality rate. The comparable rate for bird
flu has fallen from nearly 70 percent to 35 percent
this year.
Also worrying health officials is the emergence of
asymptomatic bird flu in poultry. |
HONG
KONG (AP) - A flu outbreak has sickened about 280 people
in a southern Chinese village, but early
tests show it was not caused by the bird flu virus that
has jumped to humans and killed dozens of people in
Asia, the Hong Kong government said Monday.
The victims suffered mild symptoms including fever,
cough and muscle pains, and none required hospitalization,
the Hong Kong government said in a statement, citing
health authorities in the southern Chinese province
of Guangdong.
The statement didn't say when the outbreak occurred
in the village in Guangdong's city of Leizhou. Authorities
have begun disinfecting the unidentified village and
promoting better hygiene, it said.
Health officials are vigilant about flu outbreaks
amid warnings that bird flu could mutate into a form
easily transmissible among humans, sparking a pandemic.
The deadly H5N1 strain of bird flu has jumped from
poultry to humans in Southeast Asia, killing 52 people
and forcing ranchers to destroy millions of chickens,
ducks and other fowl. |
PORT
AU CHOIX, NFLD. - At least 1,700 seal carcasses have
washed ashore along parts of Newfoundland's northern
peninsula, prompting federal officials to investigate.
Ron Burton, of Fisheries and Oceans, said Monday that
the department has received reports of that many carcasses
near Port au Choix – and they fear more will be discovered.
Fisheries officials are in the area to find out how
many seals died and how big an area was affected.
Although they're still trying to determine the cause,
they suspect the seals were crushed by ice in the Gulf
of St. Lawrence.
Burton said it's not uncommon for younger seals to
be killed after getting caught in heavy ice.
"It seems to be a majority of young seals – whitecoats
– which is typical of an 'ice kill,'" Burton said.
"We've had some fairly strong wind events in the area
the last few weeks ... and what happens is that these
animals get caught in the ice as it's blowing around
and they end up getting crushed."
Burton said dead seals periodically wash up on shore
weeks after a big storm.
It happened in Bonne Bay within the last few years,
he said, but fewer seals died in that incident. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|