|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Storm
in Condom
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
EIJING, April 6 (Xinhuanet)
-- The fireproofing defect contributes to the collapse of
New York World Trade Centre buildings in the September 11,
2001 terror attacks, according to a report issued Tuesday.
The hijacked airplanes that struck the
World Trade Center hit with such force that the resulting
explosions blew the fireproofing off the steel columns,
accelerating heat buildup and weakening the structural
core -- contributing to the towers' eventual collapse.
The process was hastened by fires outside that consumed
the buildings' face and caused the exterior columns to
bow in, according to the report.
Still, the study by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST) concluded that no amount of fireproofing
could have saved the buildings.
NIST also said that the average survivor took more than
double the estimated time to descend emergency stairwells,
and that better communication between emergency services
could have saved more lives.
Shyam Sunder, who led NIST's fire and safety investigation,
said yesterday there were now better ways to ensure that
fireproofing adhered to steel.
"Even with the airplane impact
and jet-fuel-ignited multi-floor fires, which are not
normal building fires, the buildings would likely not
have collapsed had it not been for the fireproofing that
had been dislodged," he said.
The official World Trade Centre death toll of 911 stands
at 2,749, including those killed on the two jets that
hijackers crashed into the buildings.
New York was, in fact, fortunate that the attacks took
place in the morning, when most people had not yet reached
their offices. If the building had been fully occupied,
the report found, a full evacuation would have taken four
hours and cost 14,000 lives. |
A UN agency has warned
that Arab governments could face unrest and even revolution
if they fail to move rapidly towards democracy, pinning
partial blame on the US and Israel.
The UN Development Programme in a report - the third
in a series of assessments of the Arab world - said on
Tuesday that partial reform was no longer viable.
"If the repressive situation in Arab countries continues,
intensified societal conflict is likely to follow,"
said the Arab Human Development Report 2004.
The report was drawn up by a group of independent Arab
scholars who include the Palestinian human rights lawyer
Jonathan Kuttab.
Presenting the report in the Jordanian capital, regional
UNDP director Rima Khalaf dismissed the often-heard view
that democracy is foreign to Arab culture.
Positive steps
"Some Arab governments have begun to open themselves
cautiously and selectively to opposition forces,"
the report observed. The press release referred to this
year's presidential election in the Palestinian territories
and the municipal elections in Saudi Arabia.
It also acknowledged Egypt's decision in February to
allow multi-candidate elections for president.
The release said that while there have been some "real
and promising" moves towards greater freedom this
year, "overall the pace of progress has been disappointingly
limited".
The report also blamed the creation of Israel and the
US support for its policies for the lack of reform in
the Arab world.
The report cited the creation of Israel as one of the
roots of authoritarianism in the Middle East, along with
the discovery of oil and the support for dictators by
the superpowers during the Cold War.
Occupation
One of the major causes cited in the report was the occupation
of Iraq by the United States and its allies as violations
of freedom and obstacles to development.
Khalaf said in the launch address that over a 10th of
Arabs now lived under foreign occupation.
"Occupation is a confiscation of rights by violence,"
she said, adding that last year's Abu Ghraib scandal,
when US interrogators tortured Iraqi prisoners, meant
detainees' basic rights were no longer protected by international
jurisdiction.
The report said occupation of Arab land had given governments
an excuse to postpone democratisation, forced Arab reformers
to divert energy away from reform and strengthened groups
that advocate violence.
It also accused Washington of undermining the international
system by repeatedly using or threatening to use its UN
Security Council veto, enabling Israel to build new Jewish
settlements and extend its barrier in the West Bank.
Israeli, US denial
Israel rebuffed the claims. "For too long too many
people in the Arab world have used Israel as an excuse
to justify behaviour that cannot be justified," said
Mark Regev, spokesman for the Foreign Ministry.
"You can't have democratic elections because of
Israel and you can't give equal rights to women in Saudi
Arabia because of Israel. This is, of course, a cop out."
A spokesman for the US Near East Affairs Department also
spoke out in Israel's defence.
Greg Sullivan rejected the claims, saying: "We think
it's misguided to blame Israel for the problems and the
challenges that the Arab world faces."
Sullivan also rejected claims that the occupation of
Iraq both created excuses for Arab governments to postpone
democratisation and strengthened extremist groups which
advocate violence.
The 248-page report, published by the United Nations
Development Programme, was ready months ago, prior to
the Palestinian and Iraqi elections, but its release was
delayed because of objections by the US and Egypt.
It was finally released with the UN logo in the preface.
|
Apr. 6, 2005 - Israel
has the right to strengthen Jewish settlements in the
West Bank, an Israeli Cabinet minister said Wednesday,
a day after President Bush affirmed support for a peace
plan that calls for a construction freeze in settlements.
Justice Minister Tsipi Livni acknowledged
there are serious differences between Israel and the United
States over Jewish settlement expansion.
The issue of expansion was raised after Israeli officials
last month confirmed plans to build 3,650 homes in the
largest West Bank settlement, Maaleh Adumim.
In the West Bank, four Palestinians were
wounded by fire from private Israeli security guards protecting
a crew building Israel's separation barrier in the West
Bank. Palestinian witnesses said the four were farmers
on their way to their fields. The Defense Ministry said
the four had attacked the crew, and that the guards' lives
were in danger.
Livni told Army Radio there is agreement between Israel
and the United States on continued construction within
the built-up areas of the settlements.
"It seems that the debate is more over whether Israel
can expand the perimeters of these communities, and certainly
from an American viewpoint, as well, Israel can build
within them," she said. "There apparently will
be disputes with the Americans over this."
Livni said that despite such differences, Israel should
still be able to "strengthen" settlements.
The planned Maaleh Adumim expansion is especially contentious
because it would link the settlement to east Jerusalem,
separating Arab neighborhoods of the city from the rest
of the West Bank. The Palestinians hope to make east Jerusalem
the capital of their future state.
A year ago, after Prime Minister Ariel Sharon unveiled
a plan to withdraw from the Gaza Strip, Bush issued a
letter to Israel stating his support for its retention
of major Israeli population centers in the West Bank under
a final peace deal with the Palestinians.
But Washington has steadily opposed expansion of settlements.
"Our position is very clear that the 'road map'
is important and the 'road map' calls for no expansion
of the settlements," Bush said ahead of Sharon's
visit at his Texas ranch next week.
Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat welcomed Bush's statement.
"I urge President Bush to exert every possible effort
to stop the settlement activities and the wall in order
to maintain and sustain his vision of a two-state solution,"
Erekat said. The "wall" refers to the separation
barrier Israel is building along and inside the West Bank,
incorporating Maaleh Adumim on the Israeli side.
Last month, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said
Israel's plan to expand Maaleh Adumim was "at odds
with American policy" and could threaten peace with
the Palestinians.
An Israeli defense official recently acknowledged that
the expansion plan was liable to be bogged down for years
by legal challenges.
Livni said she does not expect sparks at the Bush-Sharon
meeting over Maaleh Adumim because the U.S. president
understands the significance of the Gaza pullout.[...] |
The Israeli army
has enhanced its military arsenal with three new sophisticated
American-made choppers.
According to Israeli military sources, the Israeli
army has received three "Apache Longbow",
27 million dollars each, on Sunday night.
"The three gunships were transported aboard a
transport plane and landed at an air force base in the
Negev. They are part of a new attack squadron of 20
choppers," the sources added.
The three "Apache Longbow", considered unique
of their kind, are provided with the most advanced fighting
capabilities and up-to-date technology.
The best attack helicopters are
part of a $650 million military
aid package
Israel to receive from the United States.
The first three of the eighteen AH-64D Apache Longbow
helicopters that will be known as "Sarafs"
arrived in Israel in American C-5 Galaxy transport planes,
the biggest transport planes in the world.
According to Boeing, the helicopter's manufacturer,
among other countries that bought the Longbow are Egypt,
Greece, Japan, Kuwait, the Netherlands, Singapore and
UK.
The Longbow, capable of automatically identifying and
locking on missile targets within seconds, saw its first
combat deployment with the U.S. in the so-called Operation
Iraqi Freedom.
Meanwhile, the army weekly "Bamahane" revealed
that a new system will be deployed along the post-withdrawal
Gaza fence through which Israeli
women soldiers will operate remote-control machine guns
in conjunction with cameras and censors.
Remote-controlled observation posts are already used
around Gaza. Watching their section of the front on
computer screens, the system operators can direct soldiers
to a point of an attempted infiltration, the paper said.
A new feature added to the system
enables the soldiers in the command post to fire an
array of machine guns at suspected infiltrators, the
weekly said.
The remote-control guns are capable
of doing the soldiers' job; chasing down the infiltrators.
|
State's policy in
occupied territories fuels union debate
Israeli academics who refuse to condemn their government's
actions in the occupied territories risk a boycott by
the UK's leading lecturers' union.
The Association of University Teachers' annual council,
which begins on April 20 in Eastbourne, will also debate
whether to boycott three of Israel's eight universities
- Haifa University, Bar Ilan University and the Hebrew
University in Jerusalem - over their alleged complicity
with the government's policies on the Palestinian territories.
The union voted against an academic
boycott policy two years ago, but campaigners believe
the motions are more likely to be passed this year.
The new boycott motion contains a clause to exclude
"conscientious Israeli academics and intellectuals
opposed to their state's colonial and racist policies".
Palestinian academics have also issued a call for an
international boycott of Israel.
Sue Blackwell, a lecturer at Birmingham University
and one of the authors of the motion, said: "We
are now better organised. One of the reasons we didn't
win last time was that there was no clear public call
from Palestinians for the boycott. Now we have that,
in writing."
The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural
Boycott of Israel called for a boycott last year. It
was signed by 60 academic trade unions, non-governmental
organisations and associations in the West Bank and
Gaza. A separate poll of staff at al-Quds University,
seen by Education Guardian, reveals that 75% support
the boycott.
Gargi Bhattacharyya, executive member and president-elect
of the AUT, said: "I will be supporting the call
for the boycott. Things aren't getting better there
for our [Palestinian] academic colleagues, they are
saying the internationally emotional pressure is an
important and a peaceful way for us to support them.
"I think within the sector there
is a lot of concern about what's happening in Palestine
and a huge concern that the Palestinian education structure
has been destroyed. Potentially there's a lot of support."
The union's executive has yet to decide how to respond
to the motions. But it has tabled its own motion which
"recognises that the peaceful resolution of the
problems facing the Middle East will not be brought
about by the erection of barriers, but by open dialogue".
Today, Education Guardian also reveals
new evidence that British academics are turning down
offers to work with big research organisations in Israel,
citing their objection to the Israeli government's policies.
In the past year, the Israeli Science Foundation (ISF),
Israel's biggest science research funding body, has
received a dozen refusals from British academics to
review grant applications.
One, received last month from an unnamed British academic,
said: "I support the academic boycott of Israeli
academic institutions, as a means of registering my
protest against Israelis' lack of respect for human
rights and continuing illegal occupation of Palestinian
land." [...] |
WASHINGTON - In response
to a new rule requiring most Canadians to carry passports
for entry into the U.S., Public Security Minister Anne
McLellan said Americans may also have to carry the document
to enter Canada.
"Our system has really always worked on the basis
of reciprocity," McLellan said outside the House
of Commons.
"And therefore we will review our requirements for
American citizens and we're going to do that in collaboration
with the United States.
"There's no point in either of us going off in a
direction without working together to determine how best
we can facilitate the flow – a free flow –
and movement of low-risk individuals."
McLellan's comments come as the U.S. State Department
announced that by 2007, most Canadians will need a passport
to enter the United States.
And by 2008, most Americans who visit
Canada won't be able to re-enter their country without
a passport.
The changes are part of border-security measures the
United States will phase in over the next three years
that are likely to have a major impact on U.S. tourism
and even on the number of Americans who make short trips
to Canada.
Canadians without a passport will be barred from entering
the United States after Dec. 31, 2006, unless they have
a special U.S. "laser visa" border crossing
card that includes a fingerprint or other "biometric
identifier" such as a retinal scan. Those cards are
issued mostly to Mexicans who want to enter the U.S.
Currently, Canadians and Americans are able to enter
the United States with little more identification than
a driver's licence or a birth certificate, though a passport
has sometimes made it simpler to satisfy immigration officers
at the border.
The new rules will still allow Canadians to enter the
United States without being fingerprinted. The U.S. demands
a fingerprint from all other foreign visitors now. |
A team of researchers
at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona has developed
new miniature sensors for analysing DNA.
The sensors have the same size and thickness
as a fingernail and reduce the time needed to identify
DNA chains to several minutes or a few hours, depending
on each chain.
These sensors can be applied to many different tasks,
ranging from paternity tests and identifying people to
detecting genetically modified food, identifying bacterial
strains in foodborne illnesses and testing genetic toxicity
in new drugs.
Once mass production of the sensors begins, their cost
and availability will be similar to that of pregnancy
test kits found in pharmacies. |
The movement to sell
a portion of IMF gold reserves to finance debt relief
for poor nations has hit a roadblock after a key US
lawmaker said Congress and the Bush administration will
block any such move.
Jim Saxton, chairman of the Joint Economic Committee
of Congress, said on Tuesday the potential profits on
IMF gold sales "rightfully belong to the original
donor countries and their taxpayers".
"Thus, these IMF gold sales would amount to a hidden
appropriation from the donor countries that were the
original source of the gold."
Saxton, who said he supported other means for debt relief,
said congressional approval would be required for any
IMF gold sale.
The movement to sell some part of IMF gold reserves,
long backed by activists for debt relief, has gathered
momentum recently.
Debt relief
In London in February, finance ministers of the Group
of Seven industrialised nations asked the IMF to draft
a proposal on gold sales for debt relief to be presented
at the spring meetings of the Fund and the World Bank
in mid-April in Washington.
Global finance officials have been searching for a
way to cut the estimated $80 billion owed by the poorest
nations to multilateral institutions such as the IMF
and World Bank.
Critics of the group say poor countries are unable
to escape crushing debt burdens and are unable to invest
in education, health and other programmes to curb poverty.
Selling IMF gold reserves to finance debt relief is
strongly favoured by Britain, the G7's current chairman,
but the United States has previously expressed reservations
about the approach.
Saxton said the US Congress "has an obligation
to protect the taxpayers and reject any proposed IMF
gold sales". |
The United Nations warned
Monday that growing poverty and urbanization may result
in a tripling in the population of the world's slums to
three billion people by the middle of the century.
Urging global action to fight poverty, if not the seemingly
unstoppable migration of people from rural areas to cities,
the UN housing agency, Habitat, said the growth of slums
was a key risk to public health and development.
"The core problem facing the international community
is our continuing failure to come to grips with the world's
slums," Habitat Chief Anna Tibaijuka said as she
opened a week-long meeting of the agency's governing board
here.
"Slums, in short, are a toxic mixture of very one
of the problems identified in the Millenium Development
Goals," she said, adding that "without intervention,
the collective slum population will grow to ... three
billion people by 2050." |
A
widely reported briefing by US investment house Goldman
Sachs alerted markets to the possibility of an oil price
superspike - a spike as high as $105 per barrel.
Yet the full report, obtained by Aljazeera.net,
paints a more complex and volatile picture.
Notably it pits gas-guzzling American
consumers against the geopolitical turmoil of oil-exporting
nations.
One the one hand it notes that "geopolitical
turmoil in key oil exporting countries coupled with populist
rhetoric ... keep foreign oil companies from developing
host country resources in a timely manner ... that could
otherwise meet oil demand growth at lower prices."
These countries, notably Russia, the
Middle Eastern producer nations and Venezuela, all come
in for criticism. Goldman Sachs believes these nations
in particular have not invested in enough capacity to
create a supply cushion.
It sees that lack of investment as part of a 30-year
cycle. Producer nations became reluctant to invest in
new production facilities after the recessions and price
collapses of the 1970s and 1980s.
On the other hand, its condemnation of US consumers is
equally unrestrained.
"Perhaps the ultimate answer to
how high oil prices need to go before demand destruction
occurs is derived from knowing when American consumers
will stop buying gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles (SUVs)
and instead seek fuel efficient alternatives. We estimate
that US gasoline prices may need to exceed $4 per gallon."
Demand destruction
For ordinary consumers around the world the phrase "demand
destruction" is one repeated often throughout the
report. As Aljazeera.net has pointed
out before, in oil and energy terms this is shorthand
for a major recession.
Goldman Sachs sees the lack of investment, coupled with
increasing demand, as a factor that has caught out producers.
But now producers, pleased with the high prices of oil,
may also be unwilling to let such amazing cash bonanzas
slip from their grasp.
It is particularly bleak over the prospect of Middle
Eastern nations adding to the supply chain.
"It is important to remember that the Middle East
has been one of the few areas in the past 30 years to
experience massive population growth - 2% to 3% per annum.
"The combination of rising populations, a lack of
a diversified economic base, and the existence of governments
that are not representative of, or responsive to, underlying
populations all point to ongoing geopolitical turmoil
and an inability to meaningfully add to oil supply."
Even more straightforwardly it says that, "persistent
high prices are improving the financial position of key
oil-exporting countries and could serve to keep potential
revolution at bay. If future political crises are to be
averted, we believe it is critical that oil-exporting
countries reinvest cash inflows [to] allow the majority
of their growing populations to have economic hope."
Peak oil
On the now popular subject of peak oil, Goldman Sachs
takes the conventional view that global production is
not reaching any kind of plateau. However it does give
the subject some consideration.
"We are not subscribers to the theory that global
oil supply has hit some magical inflection point that
will result in permanent supply declines ... in the near
future ... it appears to us that there exists a large
known quantity of both conventional and unconventional
oil resources to develop."
The company instead again blames
the lack of investment from Russia, the Middle East and
Venezuela. At the same time, in other areas of
the report, it gives passing credence to the theory. Rather
than calling it any kind of peak, it uses the phrase "geologic
maturity".
With increased geologic maturity come increased extraction
costs. Rising labour costs and the increased cost of commodities
used in the extraction of oil, especially steel, are also
helping to drive the price higher.
Rising costs
"Rising ... cost structures due to increased geologic
maturity in many of the traditional areas of oil supply
as well as service and materials cost inflation have driven
an increase in ... prices," it says.
In other words, old fields, unable to
produce what they used to produce at the same cost, are
driving up prices. Paradoxically, these rising costs eventually
translate into increased profits for oil majors and exploration
companies, as well as producer countries.
Both Opec whose "space capacity [is] essentially
gone" and global refinery capacity "now running
full out" are also cited as reasons for the conclusion
of the report, a potential "superspike" in pricing
as high as $105pb. On the other
hand "speculation" and the "terror premium",
as Aljazeera.net has already noted in previous articles,
are irrelevant in the current market.
Positive negative
Goldman Sachs sees two sides to the
superspike coin. The positive side is in oil stocks and
equities which they believe could "see as much as
80% total return ... and believe investors should add
to positions in the sector on dips, at current levels,
or even after a rally."
The negative side is about the
global economy. They reject the notion that current investment
can create a supply cushion, a significant gap between
demand and supply.
Instead they see recession as the way
the market will deal with the problem.
"Until new investments are made,
we believe demand destruction will be needed to recreate
a spare capacity cushion in order to return to a period
of lower energy prices."
One question remains, however. Will producer nations
and oil multinationals be willing to carry on investing
in a collapsing market? Would they still be interested
in spending heavily on exploration and development to
create the reports' desire, a supply cushion? One that
would inevitably end up earning the same producers less
profit? That is not a question this report could answer,
or ask. |
THE United States gave
the European Union a blunt warning yesterday against
lifting a ban on selling arms to China, saying it could
expect a reaction from Washington if it went ahead.
The US deputy secretary of state, Robert Zoellick,
said Europe sent the "wrong messages" to Beijing
even by giving consideration to such a move.
"We certainly don’t want people to be surprised
if there’s a counter-reaction," Mr Zoellick
said.
"If there ever were a point where there were some
conflict or danger, and European equipment helped kill
American men and women in conflict, that would not be
good for the relationship. It’s better to identify
that now."
Europe imposed the embargo in response to the forceful
suppression of democracy protests in Beijing’s
Tiananmen Square in 1989; but several countries, led
by France and Germany, want it lifted to help stimulate
overall trade with China.
Washington has vigorously opposed lifting the embargo,
citing a potential threat to Taiwan if Beijing acquires
hi-tech European weaponry.
Mr Zoellick said some members of Congress would be
sure to demand unspecified measures against the EU,
especially since Beijing has adopted an anti-secession
law granting itself the right to use force to head off
any Taiwanese independence bid.
"As Europe becomes a larger player on a global
stage, we urge it to consider some of the messages that
it sends," Mr Zoellick said.
|
Bush’s
new nominee for national intelligence director has a
background in human rights and Geneva Convention violations
with respect to torture and renditions just like the
new attorney general Alberto Gonzales and the new Homeland
Security director Michael Chertoff:
“John Negroponte was ambassador to Honduras from
1981-1985. As such he supported
and carried out a US-sponsored policy of violations
to human rights and international law. Among other things
he supervised the creation of the El Aguacate air base,
where the US trained Nicaraguan Contras during the 1980's.
The base was used as a secret detention and torture
center, in August 2001 excavations at the base discovered
the first of the corpses of the 185 people, including
two Americans, who are thought to have been killed and
buried at this base.”
“During his ambassadorship, human rights violations
in Honduras became systematic. The infamous Battalion
316, trained by the CIA and
Argentine military, kidnaped, tortured and killed hundreds
of people. Negroponte knew about
these human rights violations and yet continued to collaborate
with them, while lying to Congress." [...]
“Even today, Negroponte is unrepentant, arguing
that, given the political realities, his hands were
tied. As he told CNN, "Some of these regimes, to
the outside observer, may not have been as savory as
Americans would have liked; they may have been dictators,
or likely to [become] dictators, when you would have
been wanting to support democracy in the area. But with
the turmoil that [was there], it was perhaps not possible
to do that."
The quote in the paragraph above by Negroponte reveals
that Negroponte was likely chosen because he has the
exact mentality and philosophy of Presidents HW and
GW Bush. As pointed out in my article FBI and DOJ Connivance
Interconnect Terror Attacks dated 8/15/02, President
GHW Bush publicly advocated suspension of the US Constitution
and violation of laws by CIA and FBI agents inside the
US to allow domestic spying on Americans. This is what
President GW Bush and his appointees to the Attorney
General (Gonzales), CIA (Goss), Homeland Security (Chertoff)
and now Intelligence Czar, Mr. Negroponte have in mind
when they take actions to take American freedoms and
privacy for a false promise of security. Like GW Bush,
their past track records on torture and arms and drug
trafficking and money laundering with known AlQaeda
terror backers are proof enough. |
The
editorial page of the New York Times recently led with
a justifiably outraged condemnation of George W. Bush's
choice for United Nations ambassador--John Bolton, a famously
outspoken anti-UN and antimultilateral ideologue. How
ironic, then, that the Times's news editors had previously
dispatched to the UN a reporter tight with the same Boltonite
unilateralist clique--a reporter who has written about
alleged wrongdoing at the UN in such an exaggerated way
as to cast the organization and its leadership as almost
beyond redemption.
When she began her work at the UN, Judith
Miller was still under a cloud for her starring role in
the Iraq Invasion Follies, in which she hyped Saddam Hussein's
alleged weapons of mass destruction and Al Qaeda ties--claims
that greatly buttressed the White House case for war but
that ultimately proved unfounded [see Baker, "'Scoops'
and Truth at the Times," June 23, 2003]. The Times,
which has since published a series of mea culpas, placed
Miller in a quasi quarantine, according to insiders at
the paper. Yet she re-emerged, amazingly, still writing
about Iraq--now from an oblique angle: the UN's alleged
mismanagement of the Iraqi Oil for Food program.
In January 2004 the Iraqi daily Al-Mada listed 270 people
suspected of profiting while enabling Saddam's government
to evade oil sales restrictions. By April an independent
UN inquiry was under way, headed by former Federal Reserve
chair Paul Volcker. In May Miller was put on the story.
Several Times sources say they believe
Miller requested the assignment. Miller did not
respond to interview requests, and Times executive editor
Bill Keller declined to comment.
To be sure, the UN is an institution needing reform,
and the Oil for Food program, troubled. Volcker found
that the Oil for Food chief, Benon Sevan, acted in a way
that "presented a grave and continuing conflict of
interest" and was "ethically improper"--and
can't explain cash he received. The report did not, however,
suggest that Sevan's actions indicated widespread or higher-level
graft. But an examination of Miller's work shows that
she used contrivances of tone and framing and selective
citation of biased sources to create a headline-generating
super-scandal--one that Volcker's newest (March 29) report
confirms to be thus far without serious foundation.
Since October 22 she has produced no
fewer than twenty-one articles on the matter, nine of
them centered on criticism by Capitol Hill figures with
no love for the UN. She reported the scandal, GOP senators
and House members investigated and she reported the investigations
themselves as evidence that corruption was far more widespread
than the facts indicated. And through many of her articles
echoed the mantra of Republican senator and key source
Norm Coleman's Wall Street Journal op-ed, "Kofi Annan
Must Go."
In January, when Volcker released
internal UN audits, Miller's framing was subtly but significantly
different from that of other journalists. The LA Times
lead characterized the audits as showing "lax oversight,"
while Miller attempted to tie the shortcomings directly
to Annan, reporting that the audits "criticize an
office, led by a former top aide to...Annan."
Only in Miller's thirteenth paragraph do we read that
"Mr. Volcker said that the internal audits 'don't
prove anything,' but do show how the United Nations was
urged to tighten up its supervision of the program. 'There's
no flaming red flags in the stuff,' he said."
When Volcker's February interim report similarly failed
to sweepingly condemn the institution, Miller's tone turned
disdainful. Casting the document as "eagerly and
skeptically awaited by United Nations critics" and
"months overdue," she pointedly reported that
"conservatives and other critics have accused [Volcker]
of being insufficiently impartial and independent."
Miller left it to others--including
the Financial Times's Claudio Gatti--to suggest that violations
of the Oil for Food rules had been tacitly tolerated by
US authorities. Miller's articles also conspicuously dismiss
the program's role in keeping Iraq WMD-free, a point that
would remind readers of her transgressions in the pre-war
period.
Miller's bias has been most apparent in her spotlighting
of consulting work Kofi Annan's son did for a Swiss-based
company, Cotecna Inspection Services, which won a UN contract
for monitoring Oil for Food deliveries into Iraq. Granted,
nepotism makes for poor governance and great newspaper
copy--and Kojo Annan's behavior raises serious questions,
but Miller's Times articles have relentlessly sought to
tie UN problems directly to the elder Annan, long a target
of America's unilateralist right.
In one piece, Miller practically dragged Ambassador John
Danforth, well-known for his moderate views and comparative
affection for the UN, to the witness table. "Pressed
by reporters on Monday...Danforth...specifically declined
to say he had confidence in Mr. Annan's leadership,"
wrote Miller on December 1 In comparison, the Washington
Post's UN correspondent, Colum Lynch, also quoted Danforth
but left out the "declines to support" formulation,
even though Lynch was presumably one of the "reporters"
who, Miller claimed, were pressing Danforth.
Similar slant was evident in advance coverage of the
latest Volcker report, chiding Kofi Annan for inadequate
vigilance over his son's dealings with Cotecna. The Associated
Press leads with "investigators...will not accuse
[Annan] of corruption," and the Wall Street Journal
notes, "The panel has concluded that there is no
evidence Mr. Annan rigged...procurement...exerted undue
influence...or ever sought or received improper financial
benefits." [emphasis added.] But Miller's piece (bylined
with UN bureau chief Warren Hoge) says that the report
"will come as a setback for the beleaguered secretary
general," and waits till paragraph seven to offer
a more reluctant vindication of Annan: "the commission
has not uncovered any evidence [of corruption]."
Another co-bylined Miller piece,
in the March 29 Times, focuses on Volcker revelations
that Annan's former chief of staff had assistants toss
Oil for Food files. Only lower in the article, under the
subhead "Oil Report to Say Aide to Annan Culled Files,"
do we read that the files were his personal copies of
originals stored elsewhere, and that he insists it was
a routine culling to clear out space. The Times
story the next day on the report itself, written by Hoge
alone, somewhat grudgingly acknowledged the panel's conclusion
that Annan "had not influenced the awarding of"
the contract to his son's former company. Miller, too,
was in that issue--with another itty-bitty alleged malfeasance.
"United Nations diplomats" (not American, by
any chance?) released an internal UN report about a UN
office with a thirteen-person staff and a budget of $2
million criticizing such practices as sexual innuendo
and using staff for personal errands--hardly unique in
corners of vast enterprises. The report, dated February
16, was conveniently provided to journalists as the new
Volcker report appeared.
Given the consequences of Miller's shilling for Bush
Administration unilateralists during the run-up to the
UN-opposed Iraq invasion, it seems remarkable that her
editors would grant her a similar role in covering the
complex Oil for Food scandal--especially given the Times's
unique role in setting the global news agenda and establishing
perceptions. As one diplomat from a Western country put
it to me, "I think there is a more balanced and nuanced
picture of the Oil for Food program to be presented."
In a brief conversation, Hoge told me that Miller had
been brought into this story specifically to do investigative
reporting. But her work bears little resemblance to classic
journalistic gumshoeing.
So what's her real contribution? I asked
another Times colleague who has worked with Miller. He
replied, "They feel that, through her work, people
in positions of power speak on the pages of the New York
Times. Whether it is true or not is another issue."
|
A leading US civil liberties
group has obtained a document showing that the former US
commander in Iraq sanctioned the abuse that took place in
Abu Ghraib prison.
The document, which is published on the
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) website www.aclu.org,
reveals that Lieutenant-General Ricardo Sanchez authorised
interrogation techniques using dogs, stress positions,
sleep and isolation.
The techniques are against the Geneva
Conventions and are forbidden by US army regulations.
Sanchez authorised 29 interrogation techniques in the
2003 memo which was released by the Pentagon under the
Freedom of Information Act.
"Presence of Military Working Dogs. Exploits Arab
fear of dogs," is one technique listed.
"Yelling, Loud Music, and Light Control. Used to
create fear, disorient detainee and prolong capture shock,"
is another.
Perjury alleged
In addition to Sanchez's memo, the Pentagon also released
1200 pages of documents which included reports of abuse
and sworn statements by troops saying they were ordered
to beat prisoners.
"General Sanchez authorised interrogation techniques
that were in clear violation of the Geneva Conventions
and the army's own standards," ACLU attorney Amrit
Singh said.
"He and other high-ranking officials who bear responsibility
for the widespread abuse of detainees must be held accountable."
ACLU is accusing General Sanchez of perjury
after he denied that he had permitted such techniques
during a Senate Armed Services Committee in May 2004.
"I never approved any of those measures
to be used ... at any time in the last year," he
said under oath.
"Lieutenant-General Sanchez's testimony, given under
oath before the Senate Armed Services committee, is utterly
inconsistent with the written record, and deserves serious
investigation," Anthony D Romero, ACLU executive
director, said in a letter to attorney-general Alberto
Gonzales, asking him to open an investigation into possible
perjury.
Scapegoats?
Romero added: "This clear breach of the public's
trust is also further proof that the American people deserve
the appointment of an independent special counsel by the
attorney-general."
The document contradicts US army and
Defence Department claims the Abu Ghraib abuse was carried
out by individuals acting without orders.
Those accused of abusing prisoners
say they were scapegoats for high-ranking officers and
politicians who ordered that detainees be tortured so
intelligence gathering in Iraq could be improved.
"The government is asking a corporal to take the
hit for them," the lawyer of Charles Graner said
after his client was given a 10-year prison sentence in
January for being a ring-leader in the abuse scandal.
"The chain of command says, 'We
didn't know anything about this stuff'. You know that
is a lie," the lawyer said.
No surprise
Reacting to the development, Alaa Shalabi, a senior researcher
with the Arab Organisation for Human Rights in Egypt,
said the revelations were not a surprise.
"We have proof that these kinds of techniques were
practised, especially in Abu Ghraib," he said. "Such
actions raise suspicions about the whole chain of command
all the way to [US President George] Bush. These practices
have been justified by the Pentagon."
Shalabi said he thought abuses were common in all of
the detention camps run by the US military.
The US Defence Department said they will respond to the
issue in due course of time. |
WASHINGTON (Reuters)
- CIA interrogations may have played a role in the deaths
of several detainees in Iraq, as Bush administration
lawyers were advocating an aggressive interrogation
policy that critics say led to torture, military documents
and officials say.
U.S. officials have formally disclosed the death of
only one person interrogated by the CIA in Iraq -- Manadel
al-Jamadi, an unregistered "ghost" prisoner
at Abu Ghraib who died Nov. 4, 2003, while handcuffed
in a prison shower room.
But sworn statements provided to Army investigators
by military intelligence and police at Abu Ghraib contain
at least four references to CIA detainees dying during
interrogations that do not correspond with the al-Jamadi
case.
The documents, obtained by the American Civil Liberties
Union, were collected for an Army investigation that
first disclosed the presence of unregistered CIA detainees
at Abu Ghraib last September.
The documents were posted on the ACLU's Web site at
www.aclu.org last month. The Army used the acronym "OGA"
for "other government agency" to refer almost
exclusively to the CIA.
One document refers to an "OGA" detainee
dying under interrogation in September 2003, two months
before al-Jamadi.
Another suggests a death occurred in October, while
a third said a detainee died while chained in the prison
shower. A fourth document refers to a detainee dying
from heart problems during interrogation.
The allegations are based on what soldiers say they
heard and offer no substantiation. They provide few
details and have been redacted to delete the names of
the witnesses, their colleagues and superiors.
Intelligence officials dismissed the statements as
unsubstantiated hearsay or garbled references to al-Jamadi,
who the government says died from wounds received during
capture by a Navy SEAL unit.
But they acknowledged that the CIA may have played
a role in the case of an Iraqi military official who
died during military interrogation in western Iraq in
November 2003.
Maj. Gen. George Fay, who helped lead the Army investigation
at Abu Ghraib, told Reuters that al-Jamadi was the only
interrogation-related death confirmed at the prison
But his team turned up reports of at least three other
deaths elsewhere in Iraq that may have involved the
CIA. [...] |
The unfortunate
tendency in the United States to evaluate all statements
about Iraq with regard to whether they are "optimistic"
(i.e. pro-Bush) or "pessimistic" (i.e. anti-Bush) makes
it difficult for those who just want to understand what
is going on. I get slammed by the Jeff Jarvis's for reporting
bad news (shouldn't it be reported?) or I get cited by
rightwing bloggers when I say things like that the Sunni
Arab guerrilla movement cannot win.
If you spend any time reading Arabic newspapers, the main
conclusion you draw about Iraq is that it just isn't like
the typical American imagination of it. I've extracted
a few paras. (from a long set of summaries) from
the BBC World Monitoring for April 3 and 4 from the Iraqi
press below. Each of the entries has a "what in the world?"
factor as I read them, just because you don't see this
sort of thing in the US media.
April 4:
Al-Furat publishes on page 3 a 1,200-word report
citing a number of people expressing their opinion on
the "occupation" of Iraq at its 2nd anniversary. Most
people interviewed believe that the "occupation" forces
plan to remain in Iraq as long as possible and that disputes
among Iraqis prolong their presence in the country.
When and if the divisions lessen, I expect to see a popular
movement to get US troops out of Iraq.
Al-Ufuq reveals that there was a serious assassination attempt
on Jalal Talabani (the new president) on March 9.
April 3: 'Al-Da'wah publishes on the
front page a 300-word report on the statement issued by
the Al-Da'wah Party, Iraq Organization, on the 40th anniversary
of the Imam Al-Husayn martyrdom saying that our people
are being subjected to a large scale conspiracy by the
US allies and agents in the region . . .'
The new prime minister, Ibrahim Jaafari, is the leader of
the Dawa Party. He is well spoken in English, and says mollifying
things to the US and the UK, but the Dawa Party which he
leads is an old-time revolutionary Shiite Party, and here
is the statement of the Party organization itself, on the
front page of the party newspaper. I don't think they like
us very much. If you read between the lines, they are clearly
afraid that the Kurds have a tacit alliance with the Israelis.
'Al-Ufuq publishes on the front page a 250-word
follow-up report citing the Association of Muslim Scholars
denying that it has issued a fatwa permitting recruitment
in the Iraqi Army and police . . .'
Well, we saw the original announcement in the US press,
prominently displayed alongside talking head comments about
tipping points. But somehow we missed the subsequent disavowal
(no doubt by a different section of AMS).
Al-Ittijah al-Akhar on 2 April publishes on page 4 a 700-word
report citing Habib Jabir Habib, an Iranian researcher,
as saying, in a seminar organized by the Strategic and
Political Researches Gulf Centre in Dubai, that his country
still regards Iraq as a possible enemy, adding that it
has been working to prevent the US from controlling Iraq
. . . '
D'oh. 'Al-Ittijah al-Akhar on 2 April
publishes on page 7 a 750-word letter by an Islamic group
to National Assembly Sunni member Misha'n al-Juburi accusing
him of liberalism and secularism and urging him to adopt
Islam teachings . . . '
Ex-Baathists are caught between the hatred for them of religious
Shiites and of Kurds, and the hatred of them by Sunni fundamentalists
within their own ethnic group.
Al-Manarah publishes on the front page a 750-word
editorial by Khalaf al-Munshidi in which he criticizes
the British forces in Basra for launching raids on the
Tamim Tribe in Basra.
If it can't be found at google.news, did it happen?
' Al-Bayan carries on page 4 a 1,200-word report
citing a number of university professors who returned
home after the downfall of the former regime to contribute
to the construction of Iraq, complaining that they are
unable to find jobs.
Al-Ufuq publishes on page 4 a 150-word report citing an
official source at the Health Ministry informing the newspaper
that according to the latest survey conducted by his ministry
in cooperation with an international organization there
are over one million handicapped in Iraq.
Al-Ufuq devotes all of page 6 to a report discussing the
poor emergency health care services in Iraq.
Al-Ittijah al-Akhar on 2 April publishes on page 9 a 150-word
letter by an Iraqi citizen criticizing the US forces for
torturing Iraqi detainees in Mosul. The letter includes
pictures of tortured Iraqi prisoners . . .
Al-Bayan publishes on page 4 a 400-word column by Zaynab
al-Khafaji commenting on the Pentagon's recent announcement
that it plans to reevaluate the US military presence in
Iraq next summer. The writer urges the Iraqi Government
to boost the capabilities, training and performance of
the Iraqi security forces, which have proved their efficiency
in confronting terrorism, in order to provide the appropriate
grounds for the departure of foreign forces from Iraq.
Al-Ittijah al-Akhar on 2 April publishes on page 6 a 750-word
article by Abd-al-Sattar Ramadan criticizing the US for
not punishing the US soldiers responsible for abusing
Iraqi detainees in a US-run prison in Mosul . . .
Al-Mashriq runs on page 2 a 1000-word article saying that
the "lukewarm" relations between Gulf Cooperation Council
member countries and Iraq are due to the fact that these
countries have fears from the Shi'i identity of the new
Iraqi political system and the prominent role being played
by the religious authority in the political life of Iraq.
Al-Mashriq runs on page 2 a 200-word commentary saying
that the military experts' emphasis on the current situation
in Iraq has created tension in the relations between Iraq
and Saudi Arabia and as the latter fears that Al-Qa'idah
may make of Iraq a new bases, thus countering Saudi Arabia's
efforts to destroy Al-Qa'idah . . .
Al-Furat carries on page 5 a 700-word article by Ahmad
al-Murshid in which he comments on the US question that
has recently been raised: "Why do they hate us in the
Arab and Islamic world?" The writer says that not only
people in the Middle East hate the United States, but
people all over the world.
Al-Zaman publishes on page 13 a 400-word article by Mundir
al-A'sam warning against adopting federalism and dividing
Iraq into small states. The writer says that this is an
"imperialistic and Israeli scheme". '
|
TEHRAN (MNA) –
About 304 recalcitrant U.S. soldiers have been killed
by the Pentagon’s special team, intelligence sources
in Iraq have revealed.
The sources quoted high-ranking U.S. officers as saying
that since the U.S. occupation of Iraq in March 2003
more than 304 U.S. military forces have been executed
in spurious clashes at the behest of army commanders
and with the knowledge of the Pentagon.
The bodies of these soldiers have been sent to their
families and announced as forces who have been killed
in the fight against terrorists, the Mehr News Agency
correspondent in southern Iran has learnt.
The soldiers ordered killed were mainly among those
who suffered mental disorders and protested against
the massacre of Iraqi civilians and asked “Who
were they fighting for”.
Reports say the number of soldiers who have injured
or maimed themselves to flee from the scene of war in
Iraq are on the rise, and new revelations show that
this number has exceeded to 2,100 over the past two
years.
The U.S. Army medical dispensary announced four months
ago that more than 6,000 soldiers serving in Iraq suffer
from severe mental problems. The reports have also revealed
that some of these soldiers tend to kill innocent Iraqi
civilians without any particular reason in order to
reduce their mental pains. |
MADRID - A Spanish judge released
nine suspects in the Madrid train bombing investigation
from detention on Wednesday, ruling
there was insufficient evidence to remand them,
a court official said.
The judge, however, said they were suspected of collaboration
with an armed group and ordered them all to report to
court weekly.
The nine men were part of a group
of 13 arrested on Friday on suspicion of ties to prime
suspects in the March 11, 2004 attacks that killed 191
people and wounded 2,000.
The other four have already been released
from detention.
All 13 -- six Moroccans, four Syrians, an Egyptian,
a Palestinian and an Algerian -- are still accused of
collaborating with Islamist militants who carried out
Europe's most devastating al Qaeda-linked attack.
The nine freed on Wednesday, and one of the men freed
earlier this week, must report to the court weekly.
Police have arrested 89 suspects over
the bombings. Of those, 55 remain in jail or under court
supervision. |
ROTTERDAM, The Netherlands - A
Dutch court acquitted a Dutch national of Moroccan origin
of planning terror attacks on government buildings,
only sentencing him to three months
in prison for illegal firearms possession.
Samir Azzouz, 18, stood accused of planning attacks
against the Dutch parliament, Schiphol airport and a
nuclear plant.
But the Rotterdam court acquitted him,
ruling there was "no direct evidence he was preparing
an actual crime", presiding judge Sonja de Pauw
Gerlings said.
During the sentencing, Azzouz, dressed in a white sweater
and matching pants and a Muslim skullcap, flashed a
big smile to his supporters in the public gallery.
As he has been in police custody
for almost a year it was expected that Azzouz
would be released immediately as he had effectively
served his sentence.
Prosecutors, who had asked that Azzouz be sentenced
to seven years in prison, said they would appeal the
verdict.
Azzouz was arrested in June 2004 after he allegedly
held up a supermarket in Rotterdam. The authorities
said the haul from the robbery was meant to finance
terrorist activities.
The court on Wednesday also aqcuitted
him of being an accomplice in the robbery.
A search of his house following the arrest yielded
maps of the Borssele nuclear plant, the Dutch parliament,
Schiphol airport near Amsterdam and other government
buildings along with a silencer and an ammunition clip,
according to police.
The authorities said they also found radical Islamic
pamphlets, some with information on how to carry out
attacks.
The court ruled Wednesday that the "maps, drawings,
notes, ammunition clip, silencer and night vision goggles"
found in Azzouz's house "were evidently intended
for committing some crime" but ruled that they
could not be linked to an actual crime or plans for
committing an actual crime.
"The pamphlets, videos and computer disks (found
at Azzouz's house) are questionable but regarding that
the court cannot come to a more far reaching conclusion
than that the suspect had an above average interest
in religious extremist violence," de Pauw Gerlings
said.
In 2003 Azzouz was arrested for the
first time after allegedly attempting to travel to Chechnya
to join Muslim guerrillas fighting Russian troops there,
but was released because there was not enough evidence
to support the charges.
The prosecution could also try to have Azzouz arrested
again because his name came up in the case of the so-called
Hofstad group, a suspected terrorist network. A
dozen other suspects connected to the group are currently
awaiting trial on charges of belonging to a terrorist
organisation.
Azzouz is not yet charged with being a member of the
group because the investigation is still ongoing.
According to the prosecution Azzouz was in contact
with Mohammed Bouyeri, the suspected killer of outspoken
Dutch filmmaker and columnist Theo van Gogh last November.
|
WASHINGTON, April
5 (Xinhuanet) -- The US agency overseeing the country's
nuclear weapons programs has asked Congress to approve
funds to study the feasibility of building a new, more
reliable nuclear warhead that could be deployed in less
than 10 years without nuclear testing, The Washington
Post reported Tuesday.
Linton F. Brooks, administrator of the National Nuclear
Security Administration, was quoted as telling the Senate
Armed Services subcommittee on strategic forces on Monday
that the current Cold War stockpile of nuclear warheads
is inadequate technically and militarily. [...]
The yields of most nuclear warheads in the current stockpiles
"are probably too high" and as their casings
are not designed to penetrate earth, "we have no
capability against hardened, deeply buried targets,"
he said.
The new warheads would be designed
to be less sensitive to ageing and would be easier to
certify as safe and reliable, Brooks said. [...] |
SHANGHAI, April 6
(Xinhuanet) -- China will build 40 nuclear power generation
units with a combined maximum capacity of 40 million kilowatts
in coming 15 years, according to the Commission of Science,
Technology and Industry for National Defense (CSTIND).
"Nuclear power will play increasing important role
in the development of China's power industry," said
Zhang Fubao, deputy director of the system engineering
department under the CSTIND, at a symposium on nuclear
power market and technology in China, opened Wednesday
in Shanghai, China's leading industrial center. |
HANOI, April 6 (Xinhuanet)
-- A 10-year-old girl from Vietnam's capital Hanoi who
died on March 27 has been confirmed to contract bird flu
virus strain H5N1.
"According to recent virus tests, specimens from
a patient named Nguyen Thi Hai Yen were tested positive
to H5N1," a local virologist, who declined to be
named, said Wednesday.
Yen died of lung failure hours after being admitted
to the Hanoi-based Saint Paul Hospital, another local
health worker said, adding that she lived in the urban
district of Long Bien which houses a big poultry market.
Vietnam has reported 35 human cases of bird flu infection
since December 2004, of whom 16 died. |
The
framing of Hanoi Jane In the second extract from
her gripping new autobiography, Jane Fonda reveals how
a fact-finding trip to North Vietnam became a mission
to expose US atrocities. |
Wednesday April 6, 2005 |
[...] A month after
Tom Hayden and I became lovers, in spring 1972, reports
began to come in from European scientists and diplomats
that the dykes of the Red river delta in North Vietnam
were being targeted by US planes. The delta is below sea
level but, over centuries, the Vietnamese people had constructed
- by hand! - an intricate network of earthen dykes and
dams to hold back the sea, a network 2,500 miles long.
The stability of these dykes became especially critical
as monsoon season approached. The Red river would begin
to rise in July and August. Should there be flooding,
the rice harvest would be ruined, and the mining of the
Haiphong harbour would prevent food from being imported.
People would starve.
The Nixon administration and its US ambassador to the
UN, George HW Bush, would vehemently deny what was happening,
but the following are excerpts from transcripts of conversations
between President Nixon and top administration officials:
April 25, 1972
President Nixon: "We've got to be thinking in terms
of an all-out bombing attack [of North Vietnam] ... Now,
by all-out bombing attack, I am thinking about things
that go far beyond ... I'm thinking of the dykes, I'm
thinking of the railroad, I'm thinking, of course, the
docks ..."
Kissinger: "... I agree with you."
Nixon: "... And I still think we
ought to take the dykes out now. Will that drown people?"
Kissinger: "About 200,000 people."
Nixon: "No, no, no ... I'd rather
use the nuclear bomb. Have you got that, Henry?"
Kissinger: "That, I think, would
just be too much."
Nixon: "The nuclear bomb, does
that bother you? ... I just want to think big, Henry,
for chrissakes. [...] |
While the religion
of Tom Cruise and John Travolta has been getting some
tough press in recent days, it’s also been lauded
by President Bush’s brother.
Florida Governor Jeb Bush raised eyebrows among the
critics of the sometimes controversial religion recently
when he honored Scientology volunteers who helped victims
of hurricanes in his state.
Members of the group — which was put in the spotlight
this week by the New York Daily News for its alleged anti-homosexual
philosophy — were given a “Points of Light
Award” as Hurricane Heroes. Scientology volunteers
have been high profile at disaster scenes recently, distributing
food and water, as well as delivering controversial “touch
assist” healings that supposedly help victims through
the laying on of hands.
“The Bush brothers have both been good to some
groups that have been called cults,” says Rick Ross
of CultNews.com. “Governor Bush has recognized Scientology
while his brother in the White House has actually appointed
a follower of Reverend Moon [David Caprara] to dole out
tax payer money through the so-called faith-based initiative.
Seems to me like the fox guarding the henhouse.” |
RIYADH - Saudi authorities hailed
the killing of a wanted Al-Qaeda militant hot on the
heels of the deaths of 14 gunmen in a three-day firefight
who the opposition said included top commanders of the
Islamist network.
Security forces killed Abdul Rahman al-Yazji, a suspect
on the kingdom's most-wanted list, after tracking him
down to a southern industrial neighbourhood of the capital,
the interior ministry said.
Yazji, a Saudi national, opened fire after being surrounded
by security personnel and was slain in the ensuing shootout,
state television quoted the ministry as saying.
A wounded comrade was captured.
The raid in the capital came just a day after security
forces wrapped up a three-day assault on militants holed
up in the Al-Qassim region, an Islamist stronghold 320
kilometers (200 miles) north of Riyadh.
The interior ministry said that at least 14 militants
had been killed, including a number on the most-wanted
list, although a security force put the death toll at
up to 18.
Five wounded militants were captured while a sixth
surrendered. Fourteen security personnel were wounded.
The ministry declined to release any names but Saudi-owned
media said the dead included Al-Qaeda's commander for
the Arabian peninsula, Saleh al-Oufi, and hunted operatives
Saud al-Otaibi of Saudi Arabia and Abdel Karim al-Mejati
of Morocco. [...]
If the deaths of Oufi, Otaibi and Mejati are confirmed,
only two of Saudi Arabia's 26 most-wanted Islamist militants
remain on the run. The others have all been killed or
captured.
Ironically Oufi had been reported
killed in a security force raid last year but resurfaced
in voice recordings attributed to him by an Islamist
website calling for attacks on "crusader"
targets in the region. [...]
Including the latest deaths,
the violence which erupted in May 2003 has cost the
lives of 90 civilians, 39 security personnel and 107
militants, according to official figures. [...] |
All 55 Republican senators say
they have never seen the Terri Schiavo political talking-points
memo that Democrats say was circulated among Republicans
during the floor debate over whether the federal government
should intervene to prolong her life.
The Washington Post reported that a memo distributed
to Republican senators by party leaders called the
Schiavo case a "great
political issue" and a "tough issue
for Democrats." Acting on the suggestions of
their advisors, Republicans called an emergency session
of Congress and passed a bill that forced the matter
to appear before federal courts. For
the first time in his four-plus years as President,
Bush interrupted a vacation on his Texas ranch and
returned to Washington at 1:00 a.m. to sign Congress'
bill.
The rest of the legal story unfolded much like it
did in the past; the case was dismissed by successive
Federal Judges, all the way up to the Supreme Court
(again). In the meantime, Republicans used the public
forum of Congress to expound their views on the Schiavo
matter.
A survey by The Washington Times
found that every Republican said the memo was not crafted
or distributed by him or her. Every
one of them said he or she had not seen it until the
memo was the subject of speculation in major news organs,
particularly ABC News and The Washington Post.
Democrats said Republicans distributed the memo, and
one Democratic official told The Post that a Republican
senator gave it to a Democratic senator.
The Times surveyed all 44 Democrats and the chamber's
one independent, and only one of them, Sen. Tom Harkin,
Iowa Democrat, said through a spokeswoman that he saw
it circulated on the Senate floor.
"He said that the memo was being circulated by
Republican members on Thursday before we went out of
session, and that is when he saw it," said his
spokeswoman, Allison Dobson.
Two Democratic offices refused to respond - Sen. Jack
Reed of Rhode Island and Senate Minority Leader Harry
Reid, Nevada Democrat - the latter even as he continued
to accuse Republicans of being behind it.
"We will not participate
in the survey. News outlets have investigated and authenticated
the memo was real and came from Republican sources.
We have no further comment," said spokeswoman Tessa
Hafen. "If you want more information on
the memo, you should work on finding the Republican
who wrote it."
She did not respond to a request to name the newspaper
or network that had "authenticated" the memorandum.
ABC News first reported on March 18 that talking points
were circulated among Republican senators, and The Washington
Post two days later called the document "an unsigned
one-page memo, distributed to Republican senators."
Neither report cited its sources, but a later article
in The Post quoted a Democratic Senate official saying,
"The fact is, these talking points were given to
a Democratic member by a Republican senator." That
article and another in the New York Times said the memo
was then given to reporters by Democratic aides.
Sen. Robert F. Bennett, Utah Republican,
said the issue "stinks" of a news fabrication
similar to the one that engulfed CBS anchorman Dan Rather
during the 2004 presidential campaign, after he reported
that President Bush did not fulfill his duties while
in the National Guard, citing documents that CBS later
admitted could not be authenticated.
"I've never seen it, and nobody ever gave it to
me," Mr. Bennett said of the purported Schiavo
memo, adding: "As far as
I'm concerned, it is an invention of the press."
Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg, New Jersey Democrat, has
called for the Senate Rules and Administration Committee
to investigate.
"Those who would attempt to influence debate in
the United States Senate should not hide behind anonymous
pieces of paper," he said in his March 23 letter
asking for the inquiry.
Mr. Lautenberg said yesterday that he never saw the
document on the floor. Staffers in his office said they
got a copy of it from a Web site and passed on copies
to the rules committee.
Sen. Trent Lott, Mississippi Republican and chairman
of the rules committee, said yesterday that he would
look into who, how and when the document was produced,
although he is skeptical of the Democratic charges.
"We have not been able to find the source and
I was on the floor the whole time until 10 o'clock that
night and I never saw it," Mr. Lott said.
The Post, in a dispatch last week, cited a "Democratic
Senate official" who said, "It's ridiculous
to suggest that these are some talking points concocted
by a Democratic staffer. The fact is, these talking
points were given to a Democratic member by a Republican
senator."
The memo has been cited repeatedly
by columnists as evidence that Republicans were trying
to exploit the dispute over Mrs. Schiavo, who died last
week - 13 days after her feeding tube was removed. Some
press reports also said the memo was distributed by
Republican leaders - a notion the leadership offices
strongly denied. [...] |
Terri Schiavo is dead but the political
storm unleashed by her passing shows no sign of abating
- with the polarising and embattled figure of Tom DeLay,
one of the most powerful Republicans on Capitol Hill,
squarely in its eye. [...]
But whatever the forensic findings,
the political shockwaves of the story will continue
to reverberate, pitting conservative Republicans and
social groups, desperate to save Ms Schiavo, against
a judicial system that refused to intervene to keep
her alive.
For a conservative Christian right
that regards what has happened as legalised murder,
the culprits are America's unelected federal judges.
As the movement's leaders point out, the federal judiciary
was specifically invited to step in by emergency congressional
legislation, signed by President George Bush. But they
complain bitterly, it signally failed to do so. The
judicial system is now "totally out of control,"
said James Dobson, the head of the Focus on the Family
ministry and pressure group, and considered one of the
most influential evangelical Christians in the country.
Even more remarkable however was the outburst of Mr
DeLay, Republican majority leader in the House of Representatives
and closely linked to the religious right, who led the
campaign to have Congress interfere in an affair that
most Americans, polls say, should be resolved by the
judiciary.
The courts "had thumbed
their nose at Congress and the President," the
Texan said. More astounding still, he appeared to threaten
vengeance against those who had defied his wishes. "The
time will come for the men responsible for this to answer
for their behaviour," he thundered, implying
that impeachment of the errant judges was not out of
the question. [...] |
Paris - Those who say
eclipses herald history-shaping events will find support
for their superstition when, on Friday, the sun will be
briefly plunged into darkness on the day of Pope John
Paul II's funeral.
Astronomers, though, say the eclipse, while of a rare
and intriguing type, was calculated long ago and is simply
part of a ballet in celestial physics between the sun,
earth and moon.
It will be visible on Friday along an arc ranging from
the southwestern Pacific to South America, at a time it
will already be night in Rome. [...]
Total eclipses were often seen as the harbingers of great
events, from droughts and floods to failed harvests and
the downfall of kings.
In ancient China, the belief was that an eclipse was
caused when the gods dispatched a dragon to eat the sun.
The monster then had to be chased away with dances, incantations,
the clashing of cymbals and the unleashing of arrows and
fireworks.
Even the word "eclipse" comes from a Greek
word, "ekleipsis", which means to fail or be
abandoned.
"The sun has perished out of heaven and an evil
mist hovers over all," was Homer's horrified account
of an eclipse in The Odyssey.
Two eclipses occurred near Palestine
in AD29 and AD33 - events that, for some Christians, give
astronomical proof to the biblical account that the sky
darkened at Jesus' death on the cross. |
REUTERS SNIP: President
Bush issued a directive on Friday allowing authorities
to detain or isolate any passenger suspected of having
avian flu when arriving in the United States aboard
an international flight.
The Bush order added pandemic influenza to the list
of diseases for which quarantine is authorized. Pandemic
flu is considered a novel or re-emergent strain to which
there is little or no population immunity.
Under the directive, the Health and Human Services
Department is given legal authority to detain or isolate
any passenger suspected of having the avian flu to prevent
the person from infecting others.
Does anyone remember how SARS was supposed to kill
us all back in 2003 and how it was coming back to get
us in the winter of 2004?
Even the World Health Organization admits there is
no solid evidence to suggest that bird flu can even
spread amongst humans.
This is a slow process of conditioning the public to
accept mandatory vaccinations and restrictions on mobility
under a rule of martial law.
The ball started rolling back in 2001 when the Model
States Emergency Health Powers Act was passed, which
allows for total government takeoever of every industry,
vehicle, building, location, distribution process, you
name it.
And when this flu pandemic happens who will we blame?
Surely not US scientists playing around with the deadly
1918 Spanish flu virus at "less than the maximum
level of containment" according to the New
Scientist magazine |
SCOTTISH
ministers and their civil servants are set to be issued
with the antiviral drug that will be used to combat
the impending flu pandemic – ahead of children,
pregnant women and the elderly.
The Sunday Herald can reveal that Jack
McConnell’s colleagues in the Executive will be
among the first workers providing "essential"
services to be protected from a health threat that could
kill up to 50,000 Scots.
News of the special treatment has
angered opposition MSPs who believe that politicians
should not be jumping the queue for vital treatments.
UK government officials believe a
new hybrid of the bird flu virus that has killed 46
people in Vietnam, Thailand and Cambodia will reach
Britain "at any time". [...]
Top of the list will be NHS staff such as doctors and
nurses, who are said to have a vital role in treating
those affected by flu, as well as helping prevent the
strain from spreading.
Next up are “other workers” who are thought
to undertake “essential services”. While
this category is likely to include police officers,
the Sunday Herald understands that Executive ministers
and key civil service staff will also be deemed priority
cases.
It is thought that the First Minister’s team,
as well as senior mandarins, are indispensable because
of their role in co-ordinating the Executive’s
response to any crisis.
According to the document, senior
politicians are believed to be more of a priority than
the people in “high-risk groups” who make
up the third category. This
tier is likely to include young children, the over 65s,
expectant mothers and those who suffer from long-term
illnesses such as Aids. [...]
SNP health spokeswoman Shona Robison said that while
ministers were correct to prioritise groups for the
drugs, a balance should be struck.
“It’s fair enough
for health workers to be treated first, but I am not
convinced that ministers and their civil servants should
be seen before vulnerable groups,” she
said. |
Silvio Berlusconi,
the Italian prime minister, rebuffed calls for his resignation
yesterday after a stinging defeat in regional elections,
a sign that voters may be preparing to get rid of him
in the general election next year.
The centre-left coalition won 11 of the 13 regions
at stake, and Mr Berlusconi's House of Liberties alliance
kept two, its northern strongholds Lombardy and Veneto.
Francesco Storace, defeated president of the politically
important Lazio region, described the result as a "slaughter"
for the centre-right.
Late last night Mr Berlusconi made an impromptu appearance
on a state television talk show and held his first TV
debate with the opposition.
He said he would not resign, though he acknowledged
that the election results were "heavy" and
said his decision not to campaign in the regional elections
and "remain the premier of all Italians" had
been an error.
Earlier in the day he had blamed the defeat on the
difficult economic times and the price increases which
followed the introduction of the euro.
"I am serene. I know I have governed in the best
way possible," he said in an interview with the
Italian weekly Panorama, which will be published later
this week.
His rival Romano Prodi worked tenaciously to woo the
far-left Communist Refoundation party, and Mr Berlusconi
failed to seal an electoral pact with his former allies
in the Radical party and the breakaway rightwing group
founded by Alessandra Mussolini, granddaughter of the
wartime dictator.
The moderate Turin daily La Stampa said the centre-right
had "approached the elections divided, quarrelsome,
torn by rivalries and personal frustrations, just as
its opponents had done at the last regional election
in 2000. The result was the same: defeat."
The left-leaning La Repubblica went further: "It's
more than a defeat, it's a collapse."
Corriere della Serra, Italy's biggest paper, also said
it was a defeat, one "so burning that it cannot
be played down".
Mr Prodi, a former president of the European commission,
welcomed the result as a clear invitation to his coalition
"to prepare to govern, to take the country forward". |
Colonie police have
made an arrest stemming from Monday's lockdown at Colonie
Central High School.
John Pompeii, 16, of Colonie has been arrested for
the crime. Police said he put two smoke bombs inside
a tin box, about the size of a shoe box. An incense
fuse, called a punk, was attached to the smoke bombs
through a puncture in the tin box.
Police said the device was lit and left in a bathroom
stall. A teacher discovered the device and immediately
notified the principal.
Students were confined to their classrooms for over
two hours as bomb-sniffing dogs patrolled the hallways.
Colonie Police Chief Steve Heider said, "This
is a very serious thing. You have to understand, with
school safety and the school setting, this actually
falls under the Patriot Act. We'll be looking
at federal charges, in addition to state and local charges.
So, do we want to call it a prank? No. This is a very
serious, unforgiving act by someone who was hell bent,
obviously, on obstructing the school process."
Pompeii faces a felony charge of placing a false bomb
in the first degree, and two misdemeanor charges. |
Coalition of critics
wants Congress to revise controversial law.
Washington - Critics of the USA Patriot Act want the
kind of real debate they were denied when the sweeping
anti-terrorism law was passed 45 days after the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says he's willing
to accommodate them, but he wants all the law's expiring
provisions to be renewed.
Gonzales was headed to Capitol Hill on Tuesday no
less determined than his predecessor to defend the Patriot
Act against arguments that it intrudes into people's
lives. But Gonzales is employing a softer tone than
John Ashcroft while making the point that the law has
helped prevent another terrorist attack on U.S. soil.
"The attorney general has said before that if
there are suggestions that can add to the government's
ability to root out terrorists and aid us in the war
on terror, he will certainly work with Congress to do
that," Gonzales spokesman Kevin Madden said. "He
looks forward to a healthy discussion about those provisions."
Gonzales was invited to testify Tuesday before the
Senate Judiciary Committee and before the House Judiciary
Committee on Wednesday. FBI Director Robert Mueller,
who also wants full reauthorization of the Patriot Act,
was to join Gonzales for his Senate appearance.
Bipartisan Calls to Curb Law
The Patriot Act is the post-Sept. 11 law that expanded
the government's surveillance and prosecutorial powers
against suspected terrorists, their associates and financiers.
Most of the law is permanent, but 15 provisions will
expire in December unless renewed by Congress.
On the same day Gonzales was to speak to the Senate
committee, Sens. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and Dick Durbin,
D-Ill., planned to reintroduce legislation designed
to curb major parts of the Patriot Act that they say
went too far.
"Cooler heads can now see that the Patriot Act
went too far, too fast and that it must be brought back
in line with the Constitution," said Gregory Nojeim,
associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union's
Washington legislative office.
The ACLU is part of an unusual coalition of liberal
and conservative groups, including the American Conservative
Union, that have come together in a joint effort to
lobby Congress to repeal key provisions of the Patriot
Act.
Widespread concern over 'library provision'
Among the controversial provisions is a section permitting
secret warrants for "books, records, papers, documents
and other items" from businesses, hospitals and
other organizations.
That section is known as the "library provision"
by its critics. While it does not specifically mention
bookstores or libraries, critics say the government
could use it to subpoena library and bookstore records
and snoop into the reading habits of innocent Americans.
The Bush administration has acknowledged using it
only once.
But the criticism has led five states and 375 communities
in 43 states to pass anti-Patriot Act resolutions, the
ACLU says.
Even some Republicans are concerned. Senate Judiciary
Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., has suggested it should
be tougher for federal officials to use that provision.
Gonzales Offers Tweaks
Gonzales already has agreed to two minor changes to
the provision, and was expected to address those Tuesday,
a Justice Department official said on condition of anonymity
so as not to pre-empt Gonzales' testimony.
He will support giving someone who receives a secret
warrant under the provision the right to consult a lawyer
and challenge the warrant in court, and will back slightly
tightening the standard for issuing subpoenas, the official
said.
Neither change addresses the central
concern of opponents, which is that it allows the government
to seize records of people who are not suspected terrorists
or spies.
Critics say the law allows the government to target
certain groups, but the Justice Department counters
that no Patriot Act-related civil rights abuses have
been proven.
Just in case, Craig and Durbin want Congress to curb
both expiring and nonexpiring parts of the Patriot Act,
including the expiring "library" provision
and "sneak and peek" or delayed notification
warrants. Those warrants - which will not expire in
December - allow federal officials to search suspects'
homes without telling them until later.
The Justice Department said federal prosecutors have
asked for 155 such warrants since 2001. |
Philadelphia, Penn. -- As Congress
begins the critical discussion about renewing the horrendous
USA PATRIOT Act, that dangerous assault on the Bill
of Rights drawn up by former Attorney General John Ashcroft
and now Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff,
it's a good time to point out how this wretched law
is viewed out there in mainstream America.
According to records maintained by an organization
called the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, as of April
of this year, 372 towns, cities and counties, and five
of the 50 states, have passed laws in one way or another
declaring themselves to be "Patriot Act free zones."
These states and communities, which
collectively include 57 million people, or nearly
a quarter of the U.S. population, are as diverse politically
as they could possibly be. The states, for example,
include Alaska, Montana and Maine, all staunchly or
moderately conservative and Republican, and Vermont
and Hawaii, both liberal and Democratic. Communities
which have passed such ordinances are similarly diverse,
ranging from ultra-liberal San Francisco and Cambridge
to ultra-conservative Dallas and Savannah.
Most of the laws and ordinances that have been passed
are quite similar, and instruct local and state law
enforcement authorities not to cooperate with federal
agents and orders which they consider to be unconstitutional-for
example warrantless searches of library borrowing records,
or the turning over of undocumented aliens to the INS
- a remarkable affront and challenge to federal authority.
Some, like Alaska's resolution, go further and instruct
the state's congressional delegation to work actively
to repeal those sections of the PATRIOT Act which are
deemed threats to liberty and the Bill of Rights.
The message is clear. Despite all the
efforts by the Bush Administration and its Congressional
cheerleaders and PATRIOT Act supporters like Republican
Representative Tom Delay and Democratic Senator Joe
Lieberman to scare Americans into surrendering their
liberties in the name of the so-called War on Terror,
the broad public is not convinced, and is more concerned
about government threats to liberty than about some
terrorist armed with mythical weapons of mass destruction.
The Bill of Rights Defense Committee, as well as organizations
like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Friends
Committee on National Legislation, have done a good
job of spreading the word about resistance to the USA
PATRIOT Act. The BRDC in particular has helped by making
a model ordinance or resolution available and by offering
organizing
tips and instructions, based upon experience, for
those who wish to have their communities added to this
movement of resistance.
Opponents of the PATRIOT Act should also be contacting
their congressional representatives, as the issue is
now before Congress, to demand an end to the law. The
Act (drawn up with no hearings, reportedly by Chertoff,
who at the time was Ashcroft's right hand man in charge
of terrorist prosecutions), and passed almost without
opposition and no discussion by both houses of congress,
came with a time limit, which expires this year.
If it is not renewed, its provisions automatically expire.
But the administration is pushing
hard for renewal of the measure, and even has plans
to come back with measures which would go even further
in chipping away traditional civil liberties and legal
protections.
The grassroots campaign to oppose the USA PATRIOT Act
is a remarkable effort, particularly given the way it
has been virtually ignored by the mainstream corporate
media. Its primary focus on local organizing, rather
than directly on Congress, is also a model for political
struggle in an era when there is no effective opposition
party in Washington, as is its ability to unite people
of diverse and antagonistic political perspectives.
Dave Lindorff is the author of Killing Time: an
Investigation into the Death Row Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal.
His new book of CounterPunch columns titled "This
Can't be Happening!" to be published this fall
by Common Courage Press. Information about both books
and other work by Lindorff can be found at www.thiscantbehappening.net. |
TALLAHASSEE -- A deputy
sheriff shocked a Marine reservist with a Taser stun
gun in a case of mistaken identity just days after the
reservist had returned from an overseas assignment.
Leon County deputies responding to reports of a domestic
disturbance wrongly went to Demar Jackson's apartment
instead of the correct one next door.
Jackson tried to tell Deputy John Daly he was at the
wrong apartment, but Daly told him three times to turn
around. When Jackson did not turn, Daly shot him with
his Taser, sending 50,000 volts of electricity into
Jackson's bare chest and abdomen as his wife and 3-year-old
son watched. [...] |
There were 103 Taser
stun gun-related deaths in the United States and Canada
between June 2001 and March 2005, according to an Amnesty
International report released Friday.
In the first three months of this year, there were
13 Taser-related deaths — compared with six during
the same period last year, the report said.
The stun guns have been touted as less lethal than
other ways of subduing combative people in high-risk
situations, but Tasers have come under increasing scrutiny
as a number of deaths have been blamed, at least partially,
on the devices.
"No confrontation is risk free. The Taser is the
safest way to end violent confrontations for law enforcement,"
Taser International Inc. President Tom Smith said Thursday.
The report challenged Taser‘s claims that the
stun guns have saved more than 6,000 lives.
"Taser International wildly exaggerates the number
of incidents in which the use of a Taser resulted in
a life saved," the report says.
Smith contended that the company‘s statistics
are conservative and based on fact.
"This is just a further example of how out of
touch this organization
Stun guns produced by Scottsdale-based Taser are used
by more than 6,000 law enforcement agencies worldwide.
|
|
A
relative of the dead man is restrained by police. |
POLICE claim a man lunged at them with a sword before
they shot him dead in a dawn raid yesterday.
The shooting sparked wild scenes and threats of revenge
from members of the dead man's family - forcing police
to erect a screen around the Brooklyn property.
Special operations group police burst into the house
in Geelong Rd just after 6am.
Mohamed Chaouk, 29, is believed to have been shot in
the neck in the confrontation and died at the scene.
One SOG member was injured and treated on the spot.
Police at first said Mr Chaouk was a suspect in an
attempted murder, but later said he was wanted over
other serious matters.
Mr Chaouk's family said he did not deserve to die,
and alleged police had used excessive force.
His mother Fatima Chaouk, who was at home during the
drama, claimed her son did not have a weapon.
Distraught relatives clashed violently with police
at the scene.
The dead man's uncle, also Mohamed Chaouk, charged
at uniform members and was wrestled to the ground and
handcuffed. He was released soon after.
"You take one of us, I'm going to take 10 of you,"
he yelled at police.
As well as putting a screen around the house, police
donned bullet-proof vests to guard nearby Altona North
police station.
The Geelong Rd home was one of several raided yesterday.
Five people -- three men and two women, including the
dead man's mother and pregnant sister-in-law -- were
arrested.
Three more people were arrested at another house in
Geelong Rd, where Mr Chaouk's brother Ali, 24, is believed
to live.
The Metropolitan Ambulance Service treated one of the
arrested people, who was in shock.
Mr Chaouk's 13-year-old brother Omar said the police
broke down his door and pointed a rifle at his head.
He said police told him: "If you look up I'll
kill you."
The family alleges Omar was thrown to the floor and
hit.
Fatima Chaouk was flanked by relatives as she wailed
for her son.
Speaking through an interpreter, Mrs Chaouk said her
son did not have a weapon in the house.
A cousin, who did not want to be named, said that Mr
Chaouk was murdered by police.
"They (the police) could have used capsicum spray,
they could have used taser guns or some other form of
self-defence," she said.
"They are saying he had a sword.
"His mother is saying she would have known if
he had a weapon.
"It's plain murder by the police."
Commander Terry Purton, of the Victoria Police crime
department, said the raids were conducted as part of
Operation Vapour, an organised crime squad investigation
into drugs and attempted murder.
Mr Purton said there was a confrontation upstairs and
a police member discharged a firearm, fatally wounding
Mr Chaouk.
The homicide squad is conducting the investigation,
which is being overseen by the ethical standards department.
Mr Purton would not comment on whether Mr Chaouk had
produced a weapon.
Cannabis, furniture and a four-wheel drive were seized
after detectives spent the day searching the property.
Neighbours said the family had lived in the house about
15 years.
"They never bothered us, they kept to themselves,"
one woman said.
The dead man's father and brothers appeared at an out-of-sessions
court hearing last night.
Father Macchour Chaouk, 48, and brother Ali, 24, were
both charged with multiple offences including attempted
murder and trafficking drugs.
Brother Matwali Chaouk, 21, was also charged with multiple
offences including trafficking drugs and resisting police.
A fourth man, Anthony Gerard Philpot, 47, from Bentleigh,
faces five charges including obtaining property by deception.
All four were remanded in custody to appear in the
Melbourne Magistrates' Court today. |
Just when you thought
the Federal Election Commission had it out for the blogosphere,
the San Francisco Board of Supervisors took it up a
notch and announced yesterday that it will soon vote
on a city ordinance that would require local bloggers
to register with the city Ethics Commission and report
all blog-related costs that exceed $1,000 in the aggregate.
Blogs that mention candidates for local office that
receive more than 500 hits will be forced to pay a registration
fee and will be subject to website traffic audits, according
to Chad Jacobs, a San Francisco City Attorney. |
London, England -- The British
army launched a new covert regiment Wednesday to provide
surveillance for Special Forces in anti-terror operations.
Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon said the Special Reconnaissance
Regiment was formed to meet a worldwide demand for "special
reconnaissance capability," The Telegraph reported.
He said the regiment will free a large portion of elite
fighting troopers in the SAS and Special Boat Service
to carry out the "hard end" of missions.
Many of the soldiers in the fledgling unit are experienced
undercover soldiers who have conducted successful operations
in Northern Ireland.
The unit has a target membership of about 300 soldiers,
who will be dispatched to both domestic and international
missions.
The new unit is the first to be formed in Britain since
the Ulster Defense Regiment in 1970. |
If the North Atlantic
Ocean's circulation system is shut down - an apocalyptic
global-warming scenario - the impact on the world's food
supplies would be disastrous, a study said last Thursday.
The shutdown would cause global stocks of plankton, a
vital early link in the food chain, to decline by a fifth
while plankton stocks in the North Atlantic itself would
shrink by more than half, it said.
"A massive decline of plankton stocks could have
catastrophic effects on fisheries and human food supply
in the affected regions," warned the research, authored
by Andreas Schmittner of Oregon State University.
The circulation system is like a conveyor belt, taking
warm water from the Caribbean in the tropical western
Atlantic to the cold latitudes of the northeastern Atlantic.
There, the warm surface water cools and sinks, gradually
getting hauled around back to the southwest, where it
warms again and rises to the surface.
This movement is vital for northwestern Europe, for the
warm water brings the region balmy, wet weather. Without
it, Ireland, Britain, parts of France, Belgium, the Netherlands
and Germany would be plunged into prolonged, bitter winters.
The circulation is also essential for plankton, providing
an upwelling of deep-water nutrients on which these tiny
creatures feed. In turn, the plankton feed fish and other
marine animals, which in turn are harvested by humans.
Schmittner, writing in the British weekly science journal
Nature, said his computer model of plankton loss was based
on a disruption of the circulation system over 500 years,
during which the conveyor belt lost more than 80 percent
of its power.
Temporary slowdowns in the Atlantic's circulation system
have occurred in the past, most notably after the end
of the last Ice Age, about 10,000 years ago, said Schmittner.
Isotope traces from Greenland icecores suggest there
were bursts of rapid warmings of 10 C (18 F), which melted
huge amounts of Arctic ice.
This influx, because it comprised cold freshwater, sank
to the bottom of the ocean floor, essentially acting like
a giant sandbag thrown on the conveyor belt, braking its
movement.
Today, Earth is considered to be in an "inter-glacial"
period - a balmy period between ice ages.
But scientists say there is a possibility of another
big temperature rise induced by man-made global warming,
caused by the spewing of fossil-fuel greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere.
One scenario, considered outlandish only a few years
ago but now increasingly taken seriously, is that a fast
melt of part of the Greenland icesheet could slow or stop
the warm-water circulation in the North Atlantic, with
catastrophic, long-term results.
All rights reserved. © 2005 Agence France-Presse.
Sections of the i |
Climate changes in
the northern and southern hemispheres are linked by a
phenomenon by which the oceans react to changes on either
side of the planet.
A research team from the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
and the Cardiff University has shown for the first time
that ocean circulation in the southern hemisphere has,
in the past, adapted to sudden changes in the north.
The research published today in Science will enable more
accurate forecasts to be made on how the oceans will react
to climate change.
The scientists have observed that at several periods
in history when the temperature has increased in the northern
hemisphere, the southern hemisphere has entered a cooling
period, which creates a decrease in the amount of deep
water transported to the Atlantic Ocean from the south.
The opposite effect also took place: when the climate
cooled in the North Atlantic, the southern hemisphere
entered a warmer period, causing water to be transported
northwards.
These mechanisms linking the two hemispheres had already
been observed in computer climate simulations, but this
is the first time they have been confirmed with detailed
data obtained from scientific experiments using weather
records from the past.
This is the first evidence showing that waters in the
southern hemisphere play an active role in sudden climate
changes.
Today's climate in Europe and North America is greatly
influenced by the gulf stream. This ocean current carries
warm water from the Gulf of Mexico northwards along the
Florida coast, eastwards across the Atlantic and southwards
along the west coast of Europe, bringing a mild climate.
The strength of the current is dependent on the salinity
of the water travelling from the south.
If the salinity decreases, the current weakens. Scientists
predict that global warming could cause part of the Greenland
ice sheet to melt, giving rise to increased levels of
freshwater in the Atlantic Ocean.
This could reduce the strength of the gulf stream, creating
a cooler, dryer climate in Europe and North America.
However, according to the authors of this latest study,
the Atlantic Ocean could already be adapting to the changes
brought about by global warming in the same way as it
adapted to climate changes in the past.
The waters in the southern hemisphere are less salty
than those in the northern hemisphere, and this freshwater
in the south sinks to the ocean floor and is transported
to the rest of the Atlantic, reducing the salinity of
the North Atlantic Ocean and strength of the gulf stream.
Nevertheless, the researchers have observed a decrease
in the volume of freshwater sinking to the floor of the
South Atlantic Ocean.
According to Rainer Zahn, "although we don't know
where global warming will take us, this could be a sign
that the oceans are already adapting to the changes". |
New Delhi, April 6
(PTI): A strong earthquake today rocked Sumatra and nearby
Indonesian islands which were devastated by a massive
temblor last week.
The quake, measuring 5.8 on the Richter scale, was recorded
at 1650 IST and was epicentred in southern Sumatra, the
India Meteorological Department said here.
No damage or casualty due to the fresh quake was immediately
recorded.
Hundreds of people were killed last Monday by a massive
earthquake registering 8.7 on the Richter scale, centred
under the sea near Sumatra between the Indonesian islands
of Nias and Simeulue.
It occurred three months after a quake measuring in excess
of magnitude 9.0 triggered Tsunami waves which killed
nearly three lakh people across Asia and Africa. |
PETROPAVLOVSK-KAMCHATSKY,
April 6 (Itar-Tass) – The Ebeko volcano that increases
its activity in January at the North Kurile island of
Paramushir in the Russian Far East is threatening the
city of Severo-Kurilsk situated just 7 km away, scientists
said Wednesday.
Sergei Rychagov from the Kamchatka Institute for Volcanology
and Seismology told Tass that a relevant warning has been
sent to local authorities.
According to the scientist hydrogen sulphide and sulphurous
gas exhaled by the volcano are the biggest threat as well
as ash particles that find their way to reservoirs supplying
water to the city. Mudslides towards it are also possible
when snow starts melting on the volcano slopes. Scientists
are permanently monitoring the situation, Rychagov said.
According to him, Ebeko ‘is the most dangerous
volcano on the Kurile Islands.” |
NEW BEDFORD, Mass.
-- A small earthquake was felt in southeastern Massachusetts
Tuesday evening.
The Weston Observatory at Boston College reported the
magnitude 2.3 tremor, which struck about 7 p.m. EDT about
six miles north of New Bedford, was felt in nearby communities,
including Achushnet, Marion, Mattapoisett, Dartmouth and
Rochester.
"Most reports we had were of a loud bang,"
said Dina Smith, the observatory's associate director
for operations. She said a quake of that size is big enough
to be noticed, but not enough to cause damage.
"It sounded like a big truck hitting a big pothole,
but it did shake this whole building," New Bedford
firefighter Jim Kummer told WCVB-TV. |
Anatahan is a 33-square-kilometer
(13-square-mile) island which sits 322 kilometers north
of Guam.
SAIPAN, Northern Mariana Islands (AP) -- Anatahan Volcano
has erupted, shooting a thick plume of ash 50,000 feet
(15,000 meters) into the air and darkening the skies.
Officials in the U.S. commonwealth Wednesday placed Anatahan
Island off limits until further notice, advising aircraft
to exercise caution and avoid coming within 10 nautical
miles (18.4 kilometers) of the area.
Ronald Dela Cruz of the Saipan Emergency Management Office
said children were sent home early from school as ash
fell on Saipan and Tinian, but there were no injuries
or major disruptions reported.
Seismic signals began to climb slowly on Tuesday at about
10 p.m. local time. The seismicity peaked about five hours
later.
Both the Washington Volcano Ash Advisory Center and the
U.S. Air Force Weather Agency verified the plume at 50,000
feet (15,000 meters).
The Air Force said the upper ash plume was blowing east
to southeast and a lower level ash plume at about 15,000
feet (4,500 meters) was blowing toward the southwest.
The eruption is at least the fourth in the past two years.
Anatahan had no historical eruptions until 2003. That
year it erupted from May to August, covering the island
that bares its name in several feet of ash but causing
no casualties or damage to communities in the Northern
Mariana Islands, where about 70,000 people live.
The Northern Mariana Islands, about 3,800 miles (6,100
kilometers) southwest of Hawaii, has nine active volcanoes. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|