|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Givre
Strong, credible allegations
of high-level criminal activity can bring down a government.
When the government lacks an effective, fact-based defense,
other techniques must be employed. The success of these
techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant
press and a mere token opposition party.
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news,
it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how
dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or,
better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the
news blackout, the public is still able to learn about
the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
(If they tend to believe the "rumors" it must
be because they are simply "paranoid" or "hysterical.")
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest
aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your
own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead
play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and
fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist,"
"nut," "ranter," "kook,"
"crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger."
Be sure, too, to use heavily loaded verbs and adjectives
when characterizing their charges and defending the "more
reasonable" government and its defenders. You must
then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of
the people you have thus maligned. For insurance, set
up your own "skeptics" to shoot down.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics
by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested
in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political
agenda or are out to make money (compared to over-compensated
adherents to the government line who, presumably, are
not).
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the
sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession
and avoidance" or "taking the limited hangout
route." This way, you create the impression of candor
and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless,
less-than- criminal "mistakes." This stratagem
often requires the embrace of a fall- back position quite
different from the one originally taken. With effective
damage control, the fall-back position need only be peddled
by stooge skeptics to carefully limited markets.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and
the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with
a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome
evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely
free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge
of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported
it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge
by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves
the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that
would report the leak.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
For example: If Vince Foster was murdered, who did it
and why?
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating
and/or publicizing distractions.
14. Scantly report incriminating facts, and then make
nothing of them. This is sometimes referred to as "bump
and run" reporting.
15. Baldly and brazenly lie. A favorite way of doing
this is to attribute the "facts" furnished the
public to a plausible-sounding, but anonymous, source.
16. Expanding further on numbers 4 and 5, have your
own stooges "expose" scandals and champion popular
causes. Their job is to pre-empt real opponents and to
play 99-yard football. A variation is to pay rich people
for the job who will pretend to spend their own money.
17. Flood the Internet with agents. This is the answer
to the question, "What could possibly motivate a
person to spend hour upon hour on Internet news groups
defending the government and/or the press and harassing
genuine critics?" Don't the authorities have defenders
enough in all the newspapers, magazines, radio, and television?
One would think refusing to print critical letters and
screening out serious callers or dumping them from radio
talk shows would be control enough, but, obviously, it
is not. |
Terri Schiavo is dead but the political
storm unleashed by her passing shows no sign of abating
- with the polarising and embattled figure of Tom DeLay,
one of the most powerful Republicans on Capitol Hill,
squarely in its eye.
A day after Ms Schiavo died in a Florida hospice, the
unseemly battle between her parents and her husband
moved into a new phase, this time over her funeral arrangements.
Her parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, would like her
to be buried in Florida.
But the last word - as it has throughout the angry
dispute - almost certainly belongs to her husband, Michael
Schiavo, who plans a cremation. The ashes will be buried
at a secret site near Philadelphia, to avoid "a
media spectacle," according to Michael's brother,
Scott Schiavo.
In the meantime an autopsy was being carried out, which
may resolve the extent of the brain damage of Ms Schiavo,
diagnosed as being in a "persistent vegetative
state" since she was stricken in 1990.
But whatever the forensic findings,
the political shockwaves of the story will continue
to reverberate, pitting conservative Republicans and
social groups, desperate to save Ms Schiavo, against
a judicial system that refused to intervene to keep
her alive.
For a conservative Christian right
that regards what has happened as legalised murder,
the culprits are America's unelected federal judges.
As the movement's leaders point out, the federal judiciary
was specifically invited to step in by emergency congressional
legislation, signed by President George Bush. But they
complain bitterly, it signally failed to do so. The
judicial system is now "totally out of control,"
said James Dobson, the head of the Focus on the Family
ministry and pressure group, and considered one of the
most influential evangelical Christians in the country.
Even more remarkable however was the outburst of Mr
DeLay, Republican majority leader in the House of Representatives
and closely linked to the religious right, who led the
campaign to have Congress interfere in an affair that
most Americans, polls say, should be resolved by the
judiciary.
The courts "had thumbed their
nose at Congress and the President," the Texan
said. More astounding still, he appeared to threaten
vengeance against those who had defied his wishes. "The
time will come for the men responsible for this to answer
for their behaviour," he thundered, implying
that impeachment of the errant judges was not out of
the question.
His language horrified not only Democrats but also
some Republicans, appalled by an attack on the independence
of the judicial branch, enshrined in the US Constitution.
Some observers think it may deepen
Mr DeLay's considerable political difficulties on several
fronts.
In his home state, prosecutors are investigating his
involvement in a funding scandal. In Washington, where
he has had several brushes with the house ethics committee,
he is accused of taking free trips paid for by lobbyist
cronies - some of these involved in a related scandal
over Indian casino gambling. |
A recently released
report by a dozen American academics, specialists in
fields from mathematics to statistical science, has
concluded that "the hypothesis that the voters'
intent was not
accurately recorded or counted cannot be ruled out and
needs further investigation."
The report, published by "USCountVotes" -
a scientific research project whose mission is to objectively
investigate the accuracy of elections in America - maintains
that the probability that the discrepancy between the
exit poll results and the popular vote in the november
2004 election was the result of pure chance is around
959,000 to 1.
The exit pollster of record for the 2004 election was
the Edison/Mitofsky1 consortium. Their national poll
results projected a Kerry victory by 3.0%, whereas the
official count had Bush
winning by 2.5%.
Importance of Exit Polls Under such circumstances we
must rely on indirect evidence - such as exit polls,
or analysis of election result data - as a check of
the overall integrity of the official election results.
Without auditability or transparency in our election
systems, the role of exit polls as a trigger for further
scrutiny is of paramount importance.
Background
The 2004 exit polls were conducted by Edison Media
Research and Mitofsky International (Edison/Mitofsky,
or E/M) on contract with major national press and TV
news services, operating collectively as the National
Election Pool. Edison/Mitofsky conduct exit polls in
every state plus a nationwide exit poll. Confidential
exit poll data showing John Kerry ahead of George Bush
in several key “battleground states” was
disclosed to the general public on the afternoon of
November 2.
Immediately following the election, the national exit
polls showed that Kerry had won the popular vote by
a margin of 3.0%. However, by the morning of November
3rd, the official vote counts showed Bush defeating
Kerry by 2.5% in the popular vote. This discrepancy
between exit polls and the official election results
has triggered a controversy which has yet to be resolved.
Shortly after the exit poll disparity was noted, the
Edison/Mitofsky group took the position that their own
projections could not be taken as an indication of error
in the official vote count. The theory they put forward
to explain the disparity was that more of the Bush voters
had declined to be interviewed for the exit polls, while
more of the Kerry voters had completed the poll questionnaire.
Immediately after the election, those skeptical of
Edison/Mitofsky's explanation tried to obtain the precinct-level
unadjusted exit poll data to independently test Edison/Mitofsky's
explanation, but the raw data has not, to this day,
been released. In the absence of raw data, analyses
were done using “screen captures” of data
published to the Internet on election night. One such
analysis of unadjusted exit poll data was done by Ron
Baiman. Baiman found that statistically significant
discrepancies of exit poll results from reported election
outcomes were concentrated in five states, four of which
were key battleground states.
Is this merely a coincidence? How much of a coincidence
was it? [...] |
When the cardinals enter their
secretive conclave to pick the new pope, the
11 Americans voting will be the second-largest national
group behind the Italians. But don't expect an
American pope - Vatican experts are absolutely convinced
it won't happen.
"The economic, political and
military power of the United States leads to resentments,
and that's part of the human dynamic," George Weigel,
John Paul II's biographer, said before the pope's death.
An American would be "virtually impossible,"
he said.
The Rev. Richard John Neuhaus of First
Things magazine agreed. An American pontiff "would
give not only the appearance but perhaps the substance
of increasing what is perceived by many as the inordinate
hegemony of American power."
The Rev. Thomas Reese of America magazine noted that
in past centuries "the church always tried to keep
(the papacy) out of the hands of the superpower"
of the day, whether the Holy Roman Empire, Spain or
France. The exception, the 14th century French popes
who moved the Holy See to Avignon, proved disastrous.
There are other factors that make Americans unattractive
papal candidates.
Popes need to be the masters of many
languages but most Americans are fluent only in English,
Reese said.
The country's clerical sex abuse scandal also hasn't
helped America's reputation within the church and in
Rome, and the U.S. church already had a reputation for
being troublesome.
Observers also predict the American cardinals won't
form any united bloc to work effectively for a particular
policy, candidate or region such as neighboring Latin
America.
The U.S. cardinals "are not as united as they
were 10 or even five years ago," Neuhaus said,
and lack the "common mind and approach that has
characterized the American cardinals at some points
in the past."
They range from staunch conservatives like Francis
George of Chicago and James Stafford, head of a Vatican
tribunal, to Los Angeles' Roger Mahony and Washington's
Theodore McCarrick, regarded as rather more flexible
and pragmatic. [...]
Neuhaus and Weigel, both traditionalists,
said Vatican friends had commented that it was too bad
George is American because he would make an attractive
candidate otherwise. However, Weigel does think
George, who is in line to become president of the U.S.
bishops' conference in 2007, will have personal influence
among fellow electors. [...] |
VATICAN CITY - The intense guessing
game over who will be the next pope has only one certainty:
the cardinals must decide whether to follow John Paul
II with another non-Italian or hand the papacy back
to its traditional caretakers. [...]
There is no clear favorite when the 117 cardinals begin
their secret conclave later this month. [...]
One only has to recall that after
two days and eight rounds of voting 26 years ago, the
name of Karol Wojtyla - never mentioned as a serious
candidate - was announced to the crowd in St. Peter's
Square. Many there were baffled. |
France was stunned when Pope John
Paul II named Jewish-born Jean-Marie Lustiger as archbishop
of Paris. "You are the fruit of the Holy Father's
prayer," the pontiff's secretary told him. Could
it be that the cardinal-electors will now stun the world
by choosing Lustiger as next pope, the first Jew to
occupy St. Peter's See since Peter himself?
Lustiger, both whose parents died in Auschwitz, has
always insisted that, though he had converted to Christianity
at age 14, he was and remained a Jew: "I
was born a Jew and so I am. For me, the vocation of
Israel is to bring light to the goyim. That's my hope,
and I believe Christianity is the means for achieving
it."
There is a remarkable conversion dialectic in Lustiger's
life. He had himself baptized because he was so impressed
with the Catholic faith of his foster parents, who brought
him up after his real parents had been deported from
Paris in 1940. In return, Lustiger has made it his mission
to convert -- or, rather, re-evangelize -- France and
by extension Europe in an unorthodox way.
While a parish priest, Lustiger wrote a memorandum
to archbishop of Paris, Cardinal François Marty.
In it he proposed a revolutionary strategy for bringing
Christianity back to France, once called the First Daughter
of the Church. He insisted the church must abandon any
pretense of power and convert culture instead.
As George Weigel, the pope's biographer, commented
on this plan: "This meant
taking the gospel straight to the molders and shapers
of French high culture, the thoroughly secularized French
intelligentsia. The hardest cases should be put first
and France should be reconverted from the head down."
According to Weigel, Lustiger believes this memorandum
must have found its way to the Vatican and contributed
to his promotions to bishop of Orleans in 1979, archbishop
of Paris in 1981 and cardinal in 1983.
If so, Lustiger's strategy is bearing
fruit. No sooner did he ascend to the Paris See than
he targeted intellectuals, preaching to them every Sunday
evening at his cathedral, Notre Dame de Paris. This
year -- more than two decades after he inaugurated this
sermon series -- the influential Figaro newspaper ran
an eight-part series about Christian intellectuals finally
resurfacing in France after a very long internal exile:
it simply wasn't considered chic to be a man or woman
of faith.
In France, the rest of the country has always followed
the intellectuals' path. It is now fashionable again,
even for leftwing thinkers such as Regis Debré,
Ché Guevara's companion, to speak of the need
of religious instruction at school, though the government
blocked the mention of God and Christianity in the draft
of the new European constitution.
The French church, once an institution
of immense power, has become a mission church, and her
sisters in other part of the Continent are following
her example. Indeed, that mission takes place
chiefly in the once almost hopelessly secularized urban
centers, where there are now first signs of a tender
spiritual renewal.
That, too, was Lustiger's brainchild. Since Europe's
conversion has top priority for the Catholic Church,
the election of this formidable preacher and thinker
is still a possibility, even though, at 77, he is no
longer of an ideal age -- and though popular superstition
holds the last pope will be of Jewish descent and call
himself Peter II. |
Israel's Supreme Court has delivered
a landmark ruling, reviving a controversy as old as
the Jewish state and as divisive for Jews as the Reformation
was for Christians.
By a majority of 7-4, the court ruled yesterday that
gentiles who studied for conversion to Judaism in non-Orthodox
Israeli training courses, completing the process abroad,
had an automatic right to come back and obtain instant
Israeli citizenship under the Law of Return.
The verdict is being seen by many as a significant
step towards recognising the right of Reform and Conservative
rabbis to carry out non-Orthodox conversions in Israel
itself. In effect, it redefines
who is a Jew in Israeli civil law and threatens the
iron control of the Orthodox establishment in Israel
over Jewish marriage, divorce, conversion and burial.
Would-be converts based in Israel wishing to train
for conversion in the liberal streams of the Jewish
tradition are currently unable to complete the process
in the country, as a result of pressure from the Orthodox
Jewish establishment. As a result many go abroad to
convert, but up until now have been denied the privileges
accorded to Orthodox Jewish converts.
Ophir Pines-Paz, the Israeli Interior Minister, said
that the ruling would be applied "in the clearest
manner". It provided solutions, he added, for a
great many people "who are living among us today
and are forced to go through a very difficult, frustrating
and exhausting procedure."
Orthodox leaders were furious at the
court decision. The Sephardi Chief Rabbi, Shlomo Amar,
said: "There aren't two movements or three movements
in Judaism. There is only one Judaism. Whoever doesn't
go through an Orthodox conversion is not a Jew."
His Ashkenazi opposite number,
Yonah Metzger, warned that the ruling would "split
the nation in two". The Law of Return, adopted
in 1950 and still resented by Palestinians, asserts
that "every Jew has the right to immigrate to the
country". David Ben-Gurion, the founding father,
explained: "It is not the state which grants the
right to settle in the state to the Jew abroad. This
right is ingrained in him insofar as he is a Jew."
The first breach in the Orthodox monopoly came in 1989,
when the Supreme Court held that non-Orthodox proselytes
converted in their own countries counted as Jews for
immigration and citizenship purposes. The
Reform and Conservative movements represent a majority
of American Jews and a growing minority in Britain,
though they remain marginal in Israel. They offer a
less stringent entry ticket to Judaism. [...] |
The Jews-only state
in Palestine tries to purify its Jewish essence through
the construction of Jews-only roads.
"Israel has established a 300-mile road network
throughout the West Bank connecting the settlements. These
are high-security roads-three football fields wide with
their surrounding security perimeters - and they are accessible
only to Israelis. They separate Palestinian population
areas from each other and from their agricultural land;
in fact, before the current warfare, they segmented the
areas of semi-autonomous Palestinian control into 227
separate, non-contiguous patches of land." (Kathleen
Christison 'Before There Was Terrorism')
The concept of Jews-only roads should not be entirely
surprising since Jews have also created Jews-only settlements,
villages, towns, and cities, "They (palestinians)
are not permitted, by law, to move into Jewish cities
or the Jewish neighborhoods of mixed cities. (Kathleen
& Bill Christison '"Finally It Broke My Heart":
Random Impressions from Palestine')
"small luxury Jewish communities known in Hebrew
as 'mitzpim'. These mitzpim, which have extensive lands
on which their inhabitants can build, are required by
law to vet anyone who wishes to live inside them. Again
by law, non-Jews are not entitled to apply to join these
communities." (Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada,
'Apartheid targets Palestinian home-owners inside Israel'
)
So, although Palestinian-Israelis are technically allowed
to travel on these roads, in practice this is not possible
because the roads link one Jews-only settlement/town/city
to another.
There are also Jews-only cemeteries alongside the Jews-only
roads running between Jews-only settlements/towns/cities,
in the Jews-only state. Jews loathe the idea of being
laid to rest in the company of non-Jews - as if even in
death non-Jews might contaminate or poison their Jewish
essence. As Israel shamir has pointed out, "Their
separate burial is necessary to guarantee their bodily
resurrection when the Messiah comes. A Jewish body defiled
by gentile proximity won't be resurrected, according to
the Jews. Even irreligious Jews follow this separation
rule without giving it a second thought." If non-Jews
are accidentally buried amongst Jews this puts all the
Jews at resurrectional risk so they have to be dug up
and transferred to a non-Jewish cemetery, "This squeamish
attitude is particularly unpleasant: whenever the Jews
discover that a person of doubtful Jewishness is buried
among their lot they remove the body and dump it elsewhere.
It happened to an Israeli citizen Teresa Angelowitz. She
was buried in the Jewish cemetery; later on the religious
authorities discovered that she was a wife of a Jew, but
not a Jew. They exhumed her body at the dark of the night
and re-buried on the dumping ground. It happened to many
Russian soldiers who died defending the Jewish character
of Israel and were refused the burial."
Many Jews in the Jews-only state were horrified by the
tsunami which hit South-East Asia in December 2004. They
were horrified by the idea that jewish victims might end
up being buried with the tens of thousands of goy victims,
"While the whole world had sent aid to the tsunami-hit
South East Asia, Israel forwarded a team entrusted with
a unique task. Not many Israeli tourists were swept away
by the giant waves - official death toll stands at three,
with some twenty missing; not many comparing with the
hundred thousand Indonesians or even with three thousand
Swedes. Still the Israeli teams were very active on the
ground. The highly trained experts led by Rabbi Meshi
Zahav did not go to save trapped survivors or alleviate
suffering of millions; their job was to save dead Jews
from fate worse than death - that is to be buried with
the goyim in the same grave."
The Haaretz daily reported: "The Israeli rescue
teams in Thailand split up Thursday: one team worked on
identifying bodies in Krabi, while another worked on the
same task in Phuket. The Israeli crews - from the police
and Zaka (a non-profit group that specializes in identifying
victims of disasters) - are trying to locate dead Israelis
before they are buried". They pressed upon the Thai
government to postpone the mass entombment, though it
was necessary to prevent the spread of epidemics; and
Bangkok gave in. Every dead Jewish body should be taken
to Israel, or at least buried separately from impure non-Jews.
Witty Gilad Atzmon remarked: "the 'altruistic' Jews
are in a state of panic, as we all know, dead Jews are
precious, they deserve a special burial. The fact that
5-10 Jews might be lost forever among some other 125.000
gentiles is pretty horrifying, I am sure you can see it.""
(Israel Shamir 'Tsunami in Gaza' January 2nd 2005).
In the Jews-only state, with its jews-only cemeteries,
jews-only land, and jews-only roads running between jews-only
settlements/towns/cities, it is absolutely imperative
that, in death, every part of a jew's body is buried in
a jews-only cemetery, "A week after the Likud referendum,
two terrible blows were delivered. An armored vehicle
carrying a large quantity of explosives entered Gaza city
in order to blow up buildings, and was hit by a roadside
bomb planted by Palestinian fighters. It exploded, tearing
the six soldiers to pieces. The day after, the very same
thing happened on the "Philadelphi Axis": an
armored personnel carrier full of explosives, which was
sent there to blow up tunnels under the border, was hit
by a Palestinian rocket and blew up with its five crew
members. The power of each of the two explosions was such
that body parts were scattered over hundreds of meters.
The whole country saw on TV how Israeli soldiers crawled
on all fours, filtering the sand with their bare hands
in order to gather the body parts of their comrades. The
media competed in the orchestration of a necrophile hysteria,
with endless talk about "body parts" interlaced
with scenes of funerals. (Uri Avnery 'Busharon: The Countdown'
May 15th, 2004). There is no intention here of mocking
Zionists' death rituals. All cultures have their own rituals
concerning the burial of the dead and each must be given
the same respect. However, the respect that I afforded
this ritual unexpectedly blew up in my face a few months
later when I read an article in which the commentator
made an aside that Zionist state refuses to return what
is left of the bodies of human bombers to their families.
"When Michael Matza, the Inquirer's Jerusalem correspondent,
wrote a story headlined 'Palestinians' Remains Fuel a
Bitterness,' which detailed Israel's practice of not releasing
the bodies of human bombers, it provoked a hue and cry
from readers who felt the piece was too sympathetic to
families of the bombers. It didn't matter that Matza had
written numerous pieces sympathetic to Israeli victims
of "suicide" attacks. He was denounced as anti-Semitic
and labeled a "self-hating Jew," a favorite
epithet for Jewish journalists." (Barbara Matusow
'Caught in the Crossfire' American Journalism Review June/July
2004 issue). The Zionists show their utter contempt for
Palestinians by doing the exact opposite of what is demanded
of them by their own death rituals. This is part of Zionists'
cultural terrorism against the Palestinians.
There is a lot of 'Jews-only' racism in the Jews-only
state. There are, of course, racists in every society
and there are even some in Western governments, but these
days if Western politicians were to make a racist statement
in public they would immediately be attacked by their
countries' Zionist lobby and, if they didn't resign, they
would be sacked forthwith. Not so in the Jewish state.
Jewish politicians can make openly racist statements without
anyone bothering to condemn them. "An Israeli cabinet
minister has called for the expulsion of some 1.3 million
Palestinian citizens of Israel who constitute nearly one
fifth of the state's population. Transportation Minister
Avigdor Lieberman said during an interview with the Israeli
army radio (Gali Tzahal) on Sunday that the 'Arabs of
Israel' should be expelled in case a Palestinian state
was established and Jewish settlements in the occupied
West Bank and Gaza Strip were dismantled. Lieberman, a
former Moldovan immigrant, who arrived in Israel in 1978,
suggested that the existence of a large non-Jewish minority
in Israel threatened the "Jewish identity" and
"ethnic purity" of Israel. But his explicitly
racist remarks raised no ire in the Israeli political
establishment. Israeli officials, from Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon downward, refused to condemn the remarks,
suggesting a sympathy with Lieberman's ideas.
Lieberman's racism has been well known for many years.
A few years ago, he called for the bombing of the Aswan
Dam in Egypt, the Presidential palace in Damascus and
Iran's nuclear facilities. He also called for executing
Arab Knesset members Tibi and Mohamed Baraka by a firing
squad for supporting the Palestinians rights and calling
for ending the Israeli occupation. In 2002, he urged the
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to carry out "wholesale
killings" of Palestinian civilians in order to force
them to flee to Jordan and other neighbouring Arab countries."
('Israeli Minister Wants Total Palestinian-Arab 'Cleansing'')
"Recently, a law was passed in one of the Israeli
Knesset's many committees saying that settlers who will
be evacuated following a future retreat from the Gaza
Strip will be given compensation. There was a minimal
majority of one committee member for this law, which is
an essential part of Prime Minister's Ariel Sharon's plan
of "Gaza Disengagement", and in order for it
to be passed the balance was tipped to the side of the
government from outside the coalition by Member of Knesset
Mohammad Barake. Barake, a MK from "Hadash"
party (the former communist party) is, as his name might
indicate, an Israeli Arab. Limor Livnat, the Israeli minister
of education, who had also voted in favor of the law,
was one of the most noticeable politicians in a group
of right wing Knesset members and others who had each
expressed outrage that an Arab (who had, like any other
Member of the Knesset, been elected democratically) was
the one to determine the future of Israel in such an important
question. Because of Livnat's high position in the government,
there was a mini uproar in the Israeli media about the
fact that the minister of education, the person who is
in charge of what children will be taught in schools,
had said something so bluntly racist. In actuality, no
one was surprised. No one has any illusions that Ariel
Sharon and the rest of the ministers besides - maybe -
politicians from the Labor Party, think any differently
from Livnat, in spite of them remaining more or less silent
about the subject. In any normal "western" democracy
such a thing would have become an immediate scandal. I
can only imagine that if Germany's education minister
would say something even remotely close to Livnat's statement
about a Jewish parliament member, the only question would
be whether that minister would find him or herself out
of a job more quickly than it would take the foreign minister
of Israel to file an official protest." (Uri Yaakobi
'Limor Livnat and the Palestinian "problem"'
Perhaps there ought to be a Zionist lobby in the Zionist
state to keep Zionist politicians on the straight and
narrow.
The Jews-only policy does not, as yet, extend to stopping
Jews from marrying non-Jews - it just makes it impossible
for them to live together. "A new law passed by the
Israeli parliament on 31 July 2003 bars family unification
for Israelis who are married to Palestinians from the
Occupied Territories. The Citizenship and Entry into Israel
Law explicitly discriminates against Palestinians from
the West Bank and Gaza Strip. It also implicitly discriminates
against Palestinian citizens of Israel, who constitute
some 20% of the Israeli population, and against Palestinian
residents of Jerusalem, for it is they who usually marry
Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. As such, the
law formally institutionalizes a form of racial discrimination
based on ethnicity or nationality. The UN Committee on
the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination
has expressed concern about this new law and has called
on Israel to revoke it and reconsider its policy with
a view to facilitating family unification on a non-discriminatory
basis. The UN Human Rights Committee has likewise called
on Israel to revoke the law and to reconsider its policy
with a view to facilitating family unification of all
citizens and permanent residents. Not being able to obtain
family unification for their Palestinian spouses leaves
thousands of Palestinian citizens of Israel and Jerusalem
residents with two options: having their spouse live with
them illegally or moving to the West Bank and Gaza Strip,
where they would be living under Israeli military occupation,
in a situation of conflict and facing daily incursions
by the Israeli army, bombardments, house demolition, curfews
and hundreds of checkpoints, which make it extremely difficult
to move, work or carry out ordinary daily activities.
In addition, it is illegal for Israelis and Jerusalemites
to enter the Occupied Territories and those married to
residents of the Occupied Territories may only do so in
special circumstances and subject to permits and stringent
restrictions."
In july 2004, the Jews-only state renewed the law to
encourage Jews-only marriages, "Also Sunday, the
Israeli Cabinet extended for six months a rule forbidding
Palestinians who marry Israelis from living in Israel.
Human rights groups have criticized the law. Arabs make
up about 20 percent of the country's population, and many
Israelis are concerned about their growing numbers."
(Ibrahim Barzak 'Palestinian Authority Offices Burned
Down' Guardian)
Jews-only prerogatives exist on the international level
as much as they do on the domestic level. The main Jews-only
international law is that the Jews-only state does not
have to abide by United Nations' resolutions. There are
varying estimates as to how many UN resolutions are being
flouted by the Jews-only state. But worse than the refusal
to live up to these resolutions is the refusal of the
Western world to insist that the Jews-only state live
up to its international obligations. Throughout the 1990s
the American and British governments made incessant demands
for Saddam Hussein to abide by UN resolutions but they
never once demanded that the Zionist state in Palestine
do the same thing.
Both governments also made incessant demands for Saddam
Hussein to abolish his non-existent weapons of mass destruction
but never demanded the Zionist state in Palestine gets
rid of its very real weapons of mass destruction. Even
worse than the Western world's obliviousness to the Zionist
state's indifference to the UN resolutions is that the
only countries which the Western world insists must abide
by the UN resolutions are the enemies of the Jews-only
state.
The people of the Jews-only book refuse to live by man
made laws; they will abide only by laws handed down to
them by their Jews-only god.
These are not the only Jews-only international laws,
"On December 13, 2004 the EU General Affairs and
External Relations Council approved the EU-Israel Action
Plan as part of the EU's New Neighborhood Policy - one
step below full membership in the EU.
According to the released EU-Israel Action Plan: "The
EU and Israel are now closer together than ever before
and, as near neighbours, will reinforce their political
and economic interdependence. Enlargement offers the opportunity
for the EU and Israel to develop an increasingly close
relationship, going beyond co-operation, to involve a
significant measure of economic integration and a deepening
of political co-operation." Despite European declarative
positions affirming Israel's obligations in international
law, and dismissing Israel's rejection of them, and despite
Israel's shocking human rights record, the EU-Israel Action
Plan states that the "EU and Israel share the common
values of democracy, respect for human rights and the
rule of law and basic freedoms." Worse, the EU-Israel
Action Plan might even lead to Israel deciding on EU policies
themselves. It stated "the possibility for Israel
to participate progressively in key aspects of EU policies
and programmes." It provides "an upgrade in
the scope and intensity of political co-operation."
Concrete steps include that the "EU will continue
its efforts to ensure that the condemnation of anti-Semitism
will become a part of international norms through, inter
alia, appropriate UN resolutions." Considering Israel's
policy to equate anti-Semitism with criticism of Israeli
state practices vis-a-vis Palestinian civilians, this
has meant that the EU will censure itself when it comes
to address Israeli violations of human rights. The EU-Israel
Action Plan formalised the facilitation of Israel's violations
of human rights and international humanitarian law by
shielding Israel from legal and political accountability,
and by helping it escape the normal penalties or costs
that would result ordinarily from the violations."
(Arjan El Fassed, The Electronic Intifada, 'In bed with
Israel: EU's close relationship with Israel supports abuse'
)
There are also what might be called Jews-only fantasies.
Perhaps the most well known is that prior to the second
world war, when Jews were thinking about moving to Palestine,
they were told nobody was living there, "Israel Zangwill's
1901 assertion that "Palestine is a country without
a people; the Jews are a people without a country".
It hopes to create a land entirely empty of gentiles,
an Arabia deserta in which Jewish children can laugh and
play throughout a wasteland called peace." (Michael
Neumann 'What is Antisemitism?'
Other Jews-only fantasies are that when the Jews got
to Palestine the Palestinians left of their own accord
whilst making the threat that the Jews should be driven
into the sea, "On 11 October 1961 Israeli Prime Minister
David Ben Gurion declared in the Israeli Knesset: 'The
Arabs' exit from Palestine...began immediately after the
UN resolution, from the areas earmarked for the Jewish
state. And we have explicit documents testifying that
they left Palestine following instructions by the Arab
leaders, with the Mufti at their head, under the assumption
that the invasion of the Arab armies at the expiration
of the Mandate will destroy the Jewish state and push
all the Jews into the sea, dead or alive'. The phrase
"push all the Jews into the sea, dead or alive"
has acquired a life of its own as it is invoked by Zionist
supporters on a daily basis in order to justify the aggressive
policies of Israel as well as its recalcitrance in continuing
the occupation of the Palestinians of the West Bank, Gaza,
and East Jerusalem. It is a highly emotive phrase invoking
images of the Holocaust, though adapted to a Mediterranean
setting. Mr Ben Gurion gives no attribution for this phrase,
nor does he claim that it is a quote from an Arab source.
It is expressed here as if it is his personal surmise
as to the Arab army's intentions. The phrase has been
variously attributed by Zionist supporters to Yasser Arafat,
Gamel Abdul Nasser, or any other of Israel's enemies,
but none whom I have challenged, including U.S. Congressman
Henry Waxman, who made the claim in a letter to me, atributing
the phrase to Nasser, have been able to provide any documentation
of support for their claim. The speech by Mr. Ben Gurion
appears to be the origin of the phrase. The phrase, thus,
has a Jewish origin and not an Arab origin. Mr Ben Gurion
is the originator of the phrase, in all likelihood. (As
regards the idea of Arab leaders telling Palestinians
to leave). Mr. Ben Gurion's first claim that the Arab
exodus from Palestine was provoked by directives from
the leaders of the surrounding Arab states has been shown
by overwhelming historical research to be false."
(William Martin 'Who is Pushing Whom into the Sea?'
It has to be wondered, how much further this trend will
go in the future? In America, the zionists have created
a political taboo against criticisms of the Zionist state.
"Although criticism of specific Israeli policies
is permissible in the United States, it is more or less
forbidden to express fundamental criticism of the Zionist
state, of America's basic policy of support for Israel,
or of the Jewish-Zionist grip on the U.S. media or America's
political and academic life. (Remarkably, this is in contrast
to the situation in Israel itself, where Jews and even
Arab citizens of the Zionist state have much greater freedom
than Americans publicly to criticize Zionism and Israeli
policies.) Prominent persons who dare to violate this
prohibition are immediately castigated as "anti-Semitic"
(that is, anti-Jewish), and pay a heavy price in damage
to their reputations or careers. Politicians who publicly
speak out against America's support for Zionism risk almost
certain political ruin. Among the political or governmental
figures whose careers were destroyed because they violated
the powerful taboo have been U.S. Senators William Fulbright,
Adlai Stevenson III, and Charles Percy, Congressmen Paul
McCloskey and Paul Findley, and Deputy Secretary of State
George Ball." (Abdullah Mohamed Sindi 'How the Jewish-Zionist
Grip on American Film and Television Promotes Bias Against
Arabs and Muslims' Institute for Historical Review
However, this taboo is not enough for the Zionists.
They want to pass legislation which equates criticism
of the Zionist state in Palestine with anti-semitism and
outlaws anti-semitism - thereby making criticism of the
Zionist state in palestine illegal. There is no other
people around the world who insist that their government
should be protected against all criticisms. What such
Zionist legislation in America will do is to create the
only state in the world which is beyond criticism even
though it is the most racist society on Earth. |
The State Department
yesterday called on Israel to forswear nuclear weapons
and accept international Atomic Energy Agency safeguards
on all nuclear activities.
This is the second time in about two weeks that officials
in the Bush administration are putting the nuclear weapons
of Israel, India and Pakistan on a par.
The officials called on the three to act like Ukraine
and South Africa, which in the last decade renounced their
nuclear weapons.
The similar phrasing used by the officials refers to
Israel's military nuclear capability, as distinct from
"nuclear option," which is to be rolled back,
although not necessarily in the "foreseeable future."
The rare use of these terms contradicts the custom of
senior administration officials to avoid any possible
confirming reference to Israeli nuclear weapons.
The officials, who hold middle-level and lower ranks,
are Jackie Wolcott Sanders, ambassador, Conference on
Disarmament and special representative of the president
for the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, and Mark
Fitzpatrick, acting deputy assistant secretary for nonproliferation.
[...]
On March 7 President George Bush called for a strengthening
of the NPT regime and thwarting the efforts of rogue states
and terrorists to obtain weapons of mass destruction.
Bush devoted his statement to enforcing NPT clauses on
treaty regime members (like North Korea and Iran) and
ignored non- member states (India, Pakistan, Israel and
Cuba).
In the past six years, since the Wye conference in 1998,
presidents Clinton and Bush repeatedly promised then prime
ministers Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak and also Ariel
Sharon that Israel's strategic capability to protect itself
will not be harmed. [...]
Sanders and Fitzpatrick refrained from calling on Israel,
India and Pakistan explicitly to renounce their weapons.
The expectation of these three states was phrased in terms
of a vow - a verbal pledge to forswear, rather than real
action. Nor was this demand accompanied by a time table,
conditions and sanctions. [...]
In her statement yesterday Sanders said: "The Conference
should also reinforce the goal of universal NPT adherence
and reaffirm that India, Israel and Pakistan may join
the NPT only as non-nuclear-weapon states. Just as South
Africa and Ukraine did in the early 1990s, these states
should forswear nuclear weapons and accept IAEA safeguards
on all nuclear activities to join the treaty. At the same
time, we recognize that progress toward universal adherence
is not likely in the foreseeable future. The United States
continues to support the goals of the Middle East resolution
adopted at the 1995 NPT Review and Extension Conference,
including the achievement of a Middle East free of weapons
of mass destruction."
According to the Israeli experts, the American administration
does not want to expand nuclear proliferation to additional
states in the region and agrees that in time it would
be preferable to have the Middle East nuclear free, but
disagrees with the immediate adoption of a policy which
would prevent American forces like the Sixth Fleet ships
and airplanes from carrying nuclear warheads in bombs
and missiles as well. [...] |
Israeli
rampage |
Settler violence against Palestinians
is burgeoning at an alarming rate, writes Khaled Amayreh
from Ramallah
Al-Ahram Weekly |
The
Palestinian Authority (PA) is calling on the international
community, including the "Quartet" (the US,
EU, Russia and the UN), to pressure Israel to put an end
to nearly daily pogrom-like attacks by messianic Israeli
terrorists on defenseless Palestinian villagers throughout
the West Bank.
Attacks have mushroomed recently as
extremist Israeli settlers vow to commit acts of "unprecedented
violence" to thwart Israel's planned "disengagement"
from the Gaza Strip.
"We urge the international community to intervene
immediately to stop this unprovoked and unjustified aggression
against our civilians," said Ahmed Subh, deputy minister
of information in the PA.
In an interview with Al-Ahram Weekly, Subh accused the
Israeli government and army of "turning a blind eye"
to the "daily pogroms and acts of savagery"
by "Israeli settler hoodlums" against unprotected
Palestinian civilians, mainly in the Palestinian countryside.
"Does anybody in the world believe
the mighty Israeli army can't rein in these criminals
who terrorise and attack schoolchildren and old women?
It is not a matter of inability. It is a matter of unwillingness,
if not outright complicity. Inaction by the Israeli government
in this respect implies acquiescence," Subh remarked.
According to Palestinian sources and international peace
activists monitoring settler violence, physical attacks
and acts of vandalism against Palestinian villages have
been occurring nearly on a daily basis in the past few
weeks. On Friday, 25 March, for example, heavily armed
Talmudic settlers from the Yitzhar settlement near Nablus
attacked Palestinians in their homes in the nearby village
of Asira Al-Qibliya. The hoodlums reportedly beat Palestinian
villagers and vandalised their property.
"They wore black masks and they were screaming,
I don't know what they were saying," said nine-year-old
Samah Ahmed, who, along with her mother and three brothers,
was nearly lynched inside her home by the attacking settlers.
Her mother Suha described the attackers as "the
Nazis of our time".
"The kids and I were alone at home. The settlers
first stoned the windows with big rocks, forcing us to
move from one room to the other for protection from the
incoming stones. Then the attackers tried to force open
the door. This really terrorised us as never before. I
was really afraid they would enter the house and kill
my four children."
Suha said the settlers then left and returned to the
settlement upon seeing other villagers coming to rescue
the family.
Hours later, when Israeli army officers arrived at the
scene to investigate the "riot", settlers erected
roadblocks and chased the officers away, preventing them
from entering the settlement. The army remarked in its
report on the incident that the settlers who carried out
the rampage against Asira Al-Qibliya were "drunk",
implying they were not responsible for their actions.
Last week, as many as 30 settlers ganged up on three
Palestinian labourers west of Ramallah, beating them with
hoses and sharp objects. At least one worker sustained
concussion from a sharp blow to the head.
Some of the most wanton attacks on Palestinians and their
property have been taking place in the southern Hebron
hills where bands of masked Israeli settlers have been
terrorising Palestinian villagers in full view of Israeli
army troops stationed in the area. On 21 March, settlers
spread poisonous feed and pellets across a large swathe
of grazing land east of Yatta, 10 kilometres southwest
of Hebron.
"The pellets are small and turquoise blue, similar
to rodent poison in the United States. They are spread
under bushes and in the grass, pretty much anywhere the
sheep graze," said Kim Lamberty, an American Christian
peace activist who inspected the area.
The next day, several sheep died and many others were
ill after grazing. Palestinians in the area have also
found two dead gazelles.
When locals and international activists asked the Israeli
army to investigate the poisoning and put an end to settler
terror, the army said it would dispatch a "settler
expert" to look into the complaint.
"This malicious act not only affects the economic
livelihood of the area's farmers, it could have a grave
impact on wildlife in the area. The local Palestinian
people along with international activists are currently
attempting to clean up the contaminated site," said
Lamberty.
On 24 March, masked settlers attacked Palestinian shepherds
and international peace activists, including two Americans
-- an 18-year-old woman and a 23-year-old man. The two
were injured as settlers tried to prevent them from filming
the attack.
A spokesman for the Israeli army told the Weekly that
responsibility for "keeping law and order" lied
with the police, not the army. A high-ranking army officer
admitted, however, that settlers were upping the ante
in the West Bank. "The situation will only intensify.
We see a trend of radicalisation in the actions of the
extremists. Attacks against Palestinians have increased,"
he said.
Palestinian official Subh is worried the worst is yet
to come. "We are afraid that the Israeli government's
inaction towards the settlers might embolden them to commit
real massacres against our people." |
The ongoing investigation
into allegations that a Pentagon staffer named Larry Franklin
passed on classified government documents to two members
of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC),
a pro-Israel lobby group, continues but with several new
twists.
Over the past weekend, several Israeli papers carried
a report by JTA, the Jewish news service, that top officials
of the lobby group had appeared in front of a grand jury
in "late January or early February," and that
the two staff members who had contact with Franklin
Steve Rosen, of AIPAC's research department, and Keith
Weissman, AIPAC's deputy director of foreign policy issues
have been placed on paid leave.
The same report also said that Mr. Franklin had been
"quietly" rehired at the Pentagon over the "FBI's
objections." Franklin, however, was not given back
his previous position in the Iran section, but instead
placed in a "non- sensitive" area which the
report didn't specify.
The FBI's investigations into Franklin's actions became
public last August when CBS reported that a "suspected
mole" at the Pentagon had passed along government
documents to AIPAC staffers. The "suspected mole"
was later revealed to be Mr. Franklin.
Time reported last December that government sources said
the investigations into AIPAC had been ongoing for about
two years, looking into allegations that AIPAC was "obtaining
sensitive data and passing it along to the Israeli government."
United Press International reported on December 9 that
the initial investigations began when the FBI discovered
"new, 'massive' Israeli spying operations in the
East Coast, including New York and New Jersey."
It was later reported in the Jerusalem Post that Franklin
had agreed to help in an FBI sting. Ha'aretz reported
that Franklin was told to tell the AIPAC staffers that
"Iran was planning to attack Israelis operating in
the Kurdish region in Iraq." The two men then "rushed
to pass it on to Israeli diplomats, thereby falling into
the FBI trap."
Franklin later stopped cooperating with the FBI, fired
his public defender laywer and hired one of Washington's
best known defense lawyers. The Washington Times reported
that the FBI was "hopping mad" at this turn
of even ts, and this was when the bureau decided to pursue
a more agressive policy, including the subpeonas of top
AIPAC officials.
Some media sources have said the entire Franklin affair
illustrates some of the internal battles that have taken
place over how the US should deal with Iraq. The document
that Franklin is alleged to have given the two AIP AC
staffers may have been a draft copy of a National Security
Presidential Directive written by Pentagon neocons (who
advocate a hard line towards Iran), which contained a
proposal to destabilize Iran. The directive had a pparently
been turned down by the White House. Ha'aretz reported
last week that the case has reached a crossroads, where
the investigators "must decide on the suspects in
the case." Either Franklin would be charged with
acting alone, or Franklin and the two AIPAC employees,
Mr. Rosen and Mr. Weissman, would be charged, or "whether,
on top of those three, the entire AIPAC organization has
acted unlawfully."
Sources close to the investigation suggested recently
that it would end in a plea bargain. Franklin would plead
to a lesser crime of unauthorized transfer of information,
Rosen and Weissman would be charged with receiving classified
information unlawfully, and AIPAC would remain unstained.
Franklin's lawyer, Plato Cacheris, yesterday denied the
reports, stating: "We have not entered any plea of
defense with the Justice Department."
AIPAC refused to say anything about the possibility
of a plea bargain.
Ha'aretz also reports that the FBI's larger goal seems
to be "an extensive examination of AIPAC itself."
Since the investigation began seven months ago, AIPAC,
one of the strongest lobbying groups in Washington, has
been "struggling in two arenas": trying to resolve
the allegations against its staff members, and more important,
dealing with the "political change going on in Israel"
in its relationship with the Palestinians.
'AIPAC is simply lagging behind developments,' said
a congressional staffer close to the issue. According
to the staffer, the fact that most of the AIPAC board
is hawkish on the Israel-Palestinian conflict makes it
difficult for the lobby to accommodate itself to Israel's
new policies. |
The
Big Hollywood Lie: Denying that Jews Control the Film Business
|
This essay is reprinted from
the April 1, 1994, issue of New American View, a newsletter
edited by Victor Marchetti. (It is no longer published.)
Marchetti served for 14 years with the CIA, where he rose
to be executive assistant to the deputy director. His book,
The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, co-authored with John
Marks, was the first critical account of the agency written
by an insider. |
When country singer
Dolly Parton told Vogue magazine a couple of months ago
that her idea for a TV series about a country singer who
becomes a gospel singer was turned down by Hollywood,
she said that "everyone's afraid to touch anything
that religious because most of the people out here are
Jewish, and it's a frightening thing for them to promote
Christianity." Truer words were never spoken.
But the ADL's chief troublemaker, Abe Foxman, immediately
flew into one of his by-now tiresome furies and fired
off a letter (which he made available to the news media,
of course) to Dolly, scolding her for her innocent, honest
comment. Foxman charged that Ms. Parton was invoking "the
old antisemitic stereotype of Jewish control of Hollywood
and hostility toward Christianity." He did not, however,
directly contradict her or deny that Hollywood is controlled
by his fellow Jews.
Being the nice person she is and knowing on which side
her bread is buttered, Dolly dutifully and publicly apologized.
She wrote to Foxman, "I regret that my words could
have conjured up an impression of Jewish 'control' of
Hollywood." Ever the arrogant, whining bully, Foxman
accepted Ms. Parton's atonement, informing the media that
is was a "refreshing capitulation." And the
Hollywood lie lives on.
The Jewish denial that Hollywood is controlled by Jews
is a great lie which can be attested to by anyone who
has ever been associated with the film industry. Here
is but one example.
In the late 1970s, New American View editor Victor Marchetti
was working as a screenwriter on a spy movie. The producer,
the director, Marchetti's agent and just about everyone
else was Jewish. The proposed film was shopped around
to several major studios. All the executives at all the
studios with whom the project team met, with one exception
-- Alan Ladd, Jr., then head of 20th Century Fox -- were
Jewish.
At one meeting, at MCA-Universal (the studio which produced
"Schindler's List"), the discussion was interrupted
when a latecomer entered the studio head's office and
took a seat next to Marchetti. He was a little, nondescript
person who seemed out of place in the production meeting.
The studio head halted the discussion and, turning to
the little man, asked if he had any problems with the
project after having read the treatment, an abbreviated
script. The man, speaking with a foreign accent, said
no, smiled at Marchetti, and departed.
"Who is he?" Marchetti asked the studio head.
The powerful Hollywood boss answered, "He's an Israeli.
I just wanted to make sure there was nothing in this movie
that he would not like." As the meeting continued,
Marchetti began to count noses. Of the nine people in
the office, Marchetti was the only non-Jew. It reminded
him of many meetings he had attended in the publishing
world in New York, where often he had been the only Gentile
out of a dozen or more people discussing a book project.
Marchetti's Jewish agent leaned over and asked in a whisper,
"What are you thinking about?"
"Everybody in the room is Jewish except me."
"Forget about that," the agent said. "You
just better hope that your Jews are smarter than the studio's.
We're talking big bucks."
Since then, Marchetti has had several other involvements
with the Hollywood movie crowd. It was always the same.
The Jews were, and remain, in control of Tinsel Town.
To say otherwise is to lie.
It is bad enough when a group representing less than
three percent of the American population -- and many of
whose members have a self-proclaimed first loyalty to
a foreign nation -- should be in control of so many of
America's cultural, financial and governmental institutions.
But it is positively insulting for them to deny their
influence and power -- particularly when they themselves
are continually boasting in their own circles about their
"overrepresentation" in these fields. And it
is absolutely infuriating when this denial reaches the
point that non-Jews are attacked by Jewish agitators and
Zionist zealots for stating obvious facts and truth.
Most Americans have always been suspicious of too much
power in too few hands. That's what the Constitution is
all about. And that is why we have never trusted elitist
groups which have tried to dictate to us. So, if we don't
trust the old-line establishment, the old elite, why should
we not be suspicious of the new elite -- the Jewish establishment
-- and its excessive power in America. |
Authorities have determined
that a New York man found with credit cards and identification
in eight different names after a late February high-speed
chase is the person he ultimately told police he was.
Israel Bleier has a valid U.S. passport, deputy district
attorney Alan Charmatz told Marin Superior Court Judge
Stephen Graham yesterday during an appearance in the defendant's
criminal case on charges of evading arrest, receiving
a stolen vehicle, possession of stolen property and three
counts of identify theft.
Bleier, 20, originally presented a French driver's license
with his picture and the name of Samuel Fine when he was
arrested Feb. 27. He allegedly sped away at upward of
110 mph after a sheriff's deputy attempted to pull over
his rented Cadillac sedan that police said was traveling
at about 90 mph on southbound Highway 101 in Novato at
3:30 a.m.
The car turned down a dead-end street after making an
unsafe lane change to get off the highway at the South
Novato Boulevard exit, according to a police affadavit.
Inside the car, police reported finding several fake
driver's licenses, two cell phones and the complete credit
history of someone whose credit card and license were
in the car.
Bleier made several complaints to the court yesterday,
including that jail officials are denying him religious
accommodations. He also attempted during a closed court
hearing to dismiss the deputy public defender who has
represented him since a private attorney withdrew from
the case without public explanation.
The defendant is scheduled to return to court next week,
when he is expected to consider a plea deal that prevent
identity theft charges from being filed in San Francisco
and Sonoma counties, the attorneys in the case said.
"I am not being treated right because I am Jewish,"
Bleier told the judge.
Specifically, Bleier said jail officials took more than
a month to accommodate religious dietary restrictions
and continue to deny him use of a tefillin. The item,
used in prayer, contains chapters of the Torah attached
to the head and arm and uses a large leather strap, which
Charmatz, outside of court, said could pose a security
risk.
Graham told Bleier he should have raised his concerns
to his attorney and told him how to pursue the permissions
he seeks.
Uncertainty about the defendant's true identity and whether
he may be a terrorist led prosecutors to seek an exceptional
$500,000 bail and increased scrutiny on the source of
funds that could be posted to secure his release from
custody.
Prior to yesterday's proceeding, Graham had lowered the
defendant's bail to $65,000; however Breier remains in
custody at Marin County Jail.
Breier yesterday sought a further reduction in bail to
the "right amount" of $10,000, which is the
default sum on the county bail schedule for the crimes
for which he is charged.
Graham rescinded the scrutiny restriction the source
of bail but did not lower the figure.
The judge cited the defendant's lack of community ties,
his alleged involvement in the high-speed pursuit and
the undetermined nature of what could be extensive financial
fraud in justifying his bail decision.
"This is not a standard, single credit card case,"
Graham said. |
Holocaust
victim sues TriMet
A woman says an incident on a bus violated her rights and
reawakened trauma she endured in a death camp |
Saturday, April 02, 2005
HOLLY DANKS |
An 81-year-old Holocaust
survivor is suing TriMet and a former bus driver for more
than $5 million, saying that when the driver yelled at
her and pushed her off his bus it reawakened the memories
of Auschwitz.
Rosa Wigmore, who survived the notorious Nazi concentration
camp, wants $3.06 million from Timothy J. Shuey and $2.02
million from the transit agency. Shuey quit TriMet shortly
after the June 27 incident.
The lawsuit says Shuey discriminated against Wigmore
by referring to her in vulgar terms as an immigrant and
telling her to "go home from where you came from"
after she complained that he missed her stop.
He then grabbed Wigmore from behind and knocked her to
the floor. When Shuey forced her out the bus' door, she
fell to the sidewalk. [...]
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in Multnomah County Circuit
Court, alleges personal injury, a violation of civil rights
and elder abuse.
"As a direct result of defendants' misconduct, Ms.
Wigmore suffered and endured extreme physical and mental
pain and suffering," including a heart attack, broken
ribs and soft-tissue damage, the lawsuit alleges. [...]
Co-counsel on the lawsuit is Elden M. Rosenthal, a prominent
Portland civil rights lawyer who 15 years ago won a $12.5
million lawsuit against a national white supremacist group
in the killing of an Ethiopian college student. [...]
Wigmore, who is Jewish and came from Yugoslavia, carries
a concentration camp tattoo on her arm. She immigrated
to the United States after World War II and became a U.S.
citizen in 1968.
Patricia Warford, a Newberg psychologist who specializes
in trauma and stress, said Friday that Wigmore would have
been at Auschwitz during a very impressionable time in
her life, in her late teens or early 20s.
"Rough treatment, being pushed and grabbed, the
humiliation piece of it were all part of Auschwitz,"
Warford said. "It certainly is possible to have a
psychological response to a trigger event, such as being
grabbed on a bus. Whether that happened is up to the jury
or court to decide."
Police reports offer this account of the June 27 incident:
Wigmore boarded the eastbound No. 54/56 bus on Southwest
Farmington Road near 99th Avenue and asked Shuey for directions.
Unable to understand her accent, Shuey told her to sit
down.
Wigmore, who has ridden the bus routes around her Beaverton
home for years, left her seat on Southwest Beaverton-Hillsdale
Highway near 77th Avenue in the Raleigh Hills area to
tell Shuey he missed her stop. That's when Shuey began
yelling and grabbed her.
According to the lawsuit, Shuey deprived Wigmore of her
First Amendment right to speak without retaliation, her
Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure
and her 14th Amendment right to be free from discrimination
based on national origin.
TriMet is to blame, the suit says, for "failing
to hire and screen applicants for the position of bus
driver who are psychologically fit to deal with the public."
The transit agency also failed to train drivers to deal
with passengers of diverse backgrounds, the suit alleges.
Fetsch said Shuey did not have a history of complaints
involving anger. She said customer service, along with
safe driving, are TriMet's top concerns.
At the time of the incident, Shuey told police that Wigmore
wouldn't leave him alone and that he "lost it."
In November, Shuey pleaded guilty to one count of misdemeanor
harassment, and a Washington County Circuit judge sentenced
him to two years' probation and required him to attend
anger-management classes. |
Most Europeans, including
almost all British citizens, will need a visa to visit
America later this year after the US Congress said that
there was little chance of postponing a deadline for the
introduction of biometric passports.
The EU has asked for more time to meet new American standards
under which travellers will be able to enter the US without
visas only if they hold a passport with a digitalised
photo stored on a chip.
But the chairman of the US Congressional committee on
the judiciary, James Stensenbrenner, said that an extension
beyond America's deadline of 25 October was "most
unlikely".
While the US administration is sympathetic to the European
argument, Congress has taken a tougher line. Its stance
raises the prospect that the EU could retaliate and impose
similar measures on Americans travelling to Europe.
The US says that, of the 25 EU nations, Austria, Ireland,
Luxembourg, Slovenia and possibly Germany and Italy will
start producing biometric passports before the deadline.
But, even in those nations, people with old- style travel
documents will need a visa to travel to the US.
Britain says it will start issuing the new passports
in the final quarter of the year, which means virtually
none will have been produced by the deadline.
The EU, which has already won one extension of the US
deadline, wants a second delay until 28 August 2006, by
which time governments have promised to produce passports
with digitalised images. It will take a further two years
for the EU nations to introduce a system which includes
fingerprint data - although as yet this is not being demanded
by the US.
Currently, most European citizens can enter the US under
a visa waiver scheme if their passports are machine-readable.
|
The power of Britain's
multi-billion-pound drugs industry has turned this country
into an over-medicalised society that believes in a pill
for every ill, a Commons inquiry will claim this week.
The report will say that the billions
of pounds poured into researching and promoting new drugs
have fuelled an over-emphasis on medicinal cures at the
expense of cheaper and better therapies, or simple prevention.
The MPs heard evidence of 'disease-mongering'
drugs firms effectively inventing diseases for which they
could then sell treatments, with relatively normal behaviour
- from mild depression to low female sex drive - re-labelled
as conditions for which drugs were supposedly necessary.
Lord Warner, the health minister responsible for medicines,
admitted to the inquiry: 'I have
some concerns that sometimes we do, as a society, wish
to put labels on things which are just part and parcel
of the human condition.'
The report from the Commons health select committee is
also expected to criticise the secretive process of licensing
medicines in Britain, following several safety scares
in which so-called 'wonder drugs' have turned out to have
serious side effects.
The common anti-depressant Seroxat was
recently linked to an increased risk of suicide in teenagers,
while the widely prescribed arthritis drug Vioxx was withdrawn
last year over links to fatal heart attacks and strokes.
Labour's election manifesto is now expected to include
a pledge to overhaul the drug licensing regime. Expert
members of the government's medicines regulator will be
banned from holding financial interests in drug firms
to avoid potential conflicts of interest.
The seven-month inquiry follows complaints from patients'
groups and senior doctors that the interests of the industry
are distorting health care priorities.
Prescriptions for Seroxat tripled after
it was licensed for mild depression, while The Observer
revealed earlier this year that it was being marketed
to doctors as a treatment for ill-defined 'social anxiety
disorders'.
Drug firms are banned from advertising directly to patients
in Britain, or offering bribes to doctors to prescribe
a certain brand. However campaigners say the industry
has discovered ways of 'guerrilla' promotion, including
generously funding medical charities - which, the inquiry
heard, raises the risk of them becoming its 'unwitting
foot soldiers'.
One mental health charity, Depression Alliance, receives
almost 80 per cent of its funding from drugs companies,
while Arthritis Care received money from Merck Sharp and
Dohme, maker of Vioxx.
Paul Flynn, the Labour MP who has campaigned to expose
the influence of the industry and gave evidence to the
committee, said it deserved an 'absolute hammering' for
its practices. 'The whole of society
has been conditioned to believe that we are dependent
on medicines. I have had arthritis all my life and I haven't
taken anything for it - I believe in exercise, swimming
and walking.'
The inquiry heard of drugs marketed to
doctors in papers written for medical journals ostensibly
by independent experts which are, in fact, ghostwritten
by the firms, which pay academics to lend their names
to the reports.
Dr Richard Horton, editor of leading
journal, the Lancet, disclosed he had been effectively
offered bribes to publish papers showing drugs in a favourable
light. He said firms offered to buy 'hundreds of thousands
of reprints' - which could be worth up to half a million
pounds to his magazine - if their paper went in.
However, a spokesman for the Association of the British
Pharmaceutical Industry denied fuelling dependence on
drugs: 'I don't think we have ever suggested that medicines
are the only answer to health problems.
'It is always down to the doctor to determine whether
there is a real medical condition. It is right we should
be informing prescribers of what medicines can be relevant.'
When the solution becomes the problem
Reclassification of the cholesterol-lowering drug simvastatin
as an over-the-counter medicine for preventing heart disease
is a classic example of the pharmaceutical industry's
worrying influence, experts warned yesterday.
The editor of The Drug and Therapeutic Bulletin , Dr
Ike Iheanacho, said long-term trials had not been carried
out to test the drug's efficacy or risks in those considered
to be in moderate danger of having heart problems. As
people could be sold Zocor Heart-Pro, the drug by its
brand name, without detailed assessment of their health,
there was also a danger that those at high risk of having
heart attacks were getting inadequate treatment.
'The absence of any long-term efficacy
trails for Zocor Heart-Pro in the target group means that
people are, in effect, being used as guinea pigs,' Iheanacho
said.
Another example is provided by the anti-depressant Seroxat.
In November, The Observer revealed that Seroxat's manufacturer
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) was trying to market it as a cure
for relatively mild forms of depression, despite the fact
that the the drug has been linked to suicide. 'The thrust
was to move sales beyond the $1 billion to the $2bn mark
by pushing it to people who were not clinically depressed,'
Professor David Healy told the select committee, while
Richard Brook, chief executive of Mind, the mental health
charity, told the MPs that the plan was 'all about developing
new conditions for that drug'.
At the same time, other options are ignored. As The Observer
pointed out last week, Britain's GPs have largely ignored
the advice of the Chief Medical Office that many depressed
patients should be prescribed exercise programmes rather
than pills. |
March 26, 2005 - Could
George W. Bush legitimately be called a murderer? Given
the overwhelming numbers of deaths in Iraq from the
illegal war, it does not take much from a legal standpoint
- for me at least - to label George W Bush a murderer.
Premeditation in the form of an illegal preemptive war
allows me to accuse him of murder.
This dry drunk, psychologically unbalanced
man, who - along with a host of other right-wing nuts
- piously talked about "the sanctity of life"
in reference to the Terri Schiavo debacle, has murdered
more people than even the most heinous of serial killers
- save his hero Hitler of course. This hypocritical
cretin, this modern day Pontious Pilate, signed death
warrants for 152 people as governor of Texas; including
a few who may have been innocent, many developmentally
disabled, and still more who were represented by "sleeping"
counsel. In one particularly reprehensible incident
Bush mocked a woman - Karla Faye Tucker - who sought
clemency on the grounds of her born again Christianity.
In an impassioned plea Ms. Tucker said, "Please
don't kill me." In an interview - as a presidential
candidate - Bush, for the benefit of interviewer Tucker
Carlson, mocked the suffering of that woman: Bush whimpered,
"his lips pursed in mock desperation, 'please don't
kill me,'" all with a sneering grin on his face.
As governor in 1999 this evangelical,
demented, frat boy signed into law in legislation which
allows medical personnel to remove life support from
those who have little chance of recovery, unless they
have the means to pay. It is known as the "Texas
Futile Care Law." Just this past week a baby was
removed from such life support against his mother's
wishes. Coincidentally, the infant was black. Of course
I must mention that the compassionate Texas legislature
and the health care industry inserted a codicil in the
law which gives the family members of the patient 10
days in which to find another provider who will care
for the victim. Of course not everyone has a million-dollar
medical malpractice settlement - like Schiavo - to seek
this remedy. And if these same sanctimonious politicians
have their way there will be no more medical malpractice
awards for such care.
The Institute of Medicine estimates that lack of health
insurance "causes roughly 18,000 unnecessary deaths
every year in the United States." Since Bush expropriated
the office of the president, some 5 million-plus have
joined the ranks of the uninsured on his watch. According
to my calculations that means that some 72,000 uninsured
- and predominately disenfranchised - people have died
needlessly. For this, George Bush should be tried for
murder, along with his co-conspirators in Congress and
the health care industry. In industry parlance it is
called "cost benefit analysis," in ethical,
moral, and legal discourse it is called murder.
The madman known as Bush also plans to significantly
cut Medicaid in addition to State Children's Health
Program (SCHIP). According to the Center for Policy
and Economic Research 1.2 million children would not
be able to access the system. That is 1.2 million kids,
predominately poor, minority, and without access to
a system that could prove to be life saving, but instead
will prove life ending. Where are those political and
evangelical scoundrels with their "sanctity of
life" bullshit when it comes to these children
who deserve to live?
The draconian Bush budget substantially cuts funding
for the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program. This
cut in a program that provides critical nutrition needs
for infants borders on the criminal - but then again,
that is exactly what occupies the White House, as well
as the halls of Congress.
Currently some 600,000 babies born in the United States
each year may be exposed to dangerous levels of mercury
in the womb. Yet the Bush administration recently issued
rules which would allow some plants to increase their
mercury emissions. And here in my home state of Florida,
10 of the "dirty dozen" power plants would
benefit from these new rules. Florida Power & Light
one of the worst pollution offenders in the state will
continue, unabayed, to poison our lakes and rivers.
The hypocrites in Washington - someone referred to
them as "Culture Vultures" - will continue
their inane posturing in defense of a woman who has
been clinically dead for some 15 years. The ethically
challenged Tom DeLay, whose prior career as an exterminator
apparently qualifies him as medical ethicist stated,
"Mrs. Schiavo's struggle to live, our fight to
save her, and the American people's prayers will all
continue."
Bush's posturing in all this is the most criminal,
given his record in Texas. In addition, his cold-blooded
murder of Muslim women and children in Iraq belie his
Holy Roller admonitions about "the sanctity of
life."
This criminal is proposing to discontinue the financing
of the construction of new housing for the mentally
ill and the physically handicapped. I suppose such cuts
fall under the aegis of "Futile Care," in
the Bush criminal lexicon.
George Bush is a criminal and should be treated and
tried as such. This unconscionable man is responsible
for worldwide anguish. This pretender, who sneers at
and mocks the less fortunate, and his fellow conspirators
should be tried for "crimes against humanity. The
souls of those he has murdered cry out for justice.
|
'Crazy' Iraqi spy
was full of misinformation, says report
An alcoholic cousin of an aide to Ahmed Chalabi has
emerged as the key source in the US rationale for going
to war in Iraq.
According to a US presidential commission looking into
pre-war intelligence failures, the basis for pivotal
intelligence on Iraq's alleged biological weapons programmes
and fleet of mobile labs was a spy described as 'crazy'
by his intelligence handlers and a 'congenital liar'
by his friends.
The defector, given the code-name Curveball by the
CIA, has emerged as the central figure in the corruption
of US intelligence estimates on Iraq. Despite considerable
doubts over Curveball's credibility, his claims were
included in the administration's case for war without
caveat.
According to the report, the failure of US spy agencies
to scrutinise his claims are the 'primary reason' that
they 'fundamentally misjudged the status of Iraq's [biological
weapons] programs'. The catalogue of failures and the
gullibility of US intelligence make for darkly comic
reading, even by the standards of failure detailed in
previous investigations. Of all the disproven pre-war
weapons claims, from aluminium centrifuge tubes to yellow
cake uranium from Niger, none points to greater levels
of incompetence than those found within the misadventures
of Curveball.
The Americans never had direct access to Curveball
- he was controlled by the German intelligence services
who passed his reports on to the Defence Intelligence
Agency, the Pentagon's spy agency.
Between January 2000 and September 2001, Curveball
offered 100 reports, among them the claims of mobile
biological weapons labs that were central in the US
evidence of an illicit weapons programme, but subsequently
turned out to be trucks equipped with machinery to make
helium for weather balloons.
The commission concluded that Curveball's information
was worse than none at all. 'Worse than having no human
sources,' it said, 'is being seduced by a human source
who is telling lies.'
Although the defector has never been formally identified,
it appears he was an Iraqi chemical engineer who defected
after UN inspectors left the country in 1998.
In the aftermath of the US-led invasion, Iraqis whom
Curveball claimed were co-workers in Saddam's alleged
biological weapons programme did not know who he was.
He claimed he'd witnessed a deadly biological weapons
accident when he was not even in Iraq when it was meant
to have happened. After September 2001, his claims were
given greater credibility despite the fact that he was
not in Iraq at the time he claimed to have taken part
in illicit weapons work. His information was central
to an October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate that
concluded Iraq 'has' biological weapons, and was widely
used by President Bush and Dick Cheney to make their
case for war.
It now appears there were problems with Curveball from
the start, but the intelligence community was willing
to believe him 'because the tales he told were consistent
with what they already believed.'
In May 2000 doubts about his credibility surfaced when
he was examined for signs that he had been exposed to
biological agents. While the results were inconclusive,
a US official was surprised to find Curveball had a
hangover and said he 'might be an alcoholic.' By early
2001, the Germans were having doubts of their own, telling
the CIA their spy was 'out of control'.
But warnings were dismissed. Intelligence analysts
who voiced concern were 'forced to leave' the unit mainly
responsible for analysing his claims, the commission
found. At every turn analysts were blocked by spy chiefs
and their warning never passed on to policy-makers.
The commission's report is unlikely to renew confidence
in America's intelligence network as it attempts to
uncover evidence of WMDs in Iran and elsewhere. The
report concludes that US intelligence agencies remain
poorly coordinated, have resisted reform and produce
'irrelevant' work. |
Classified documents show
the former US military chief in Iraq personally sanctioned
measures banned by the Geneva Conventions.
America's leading civil liberties group has demanded
an investigation into the former US military commander
Iraq after a formerly classified memo revealed that
he personally sanctioned a series of coercive interrogation
techniques outlawed by the Geneva Conventions. The group
claims that his directives were directly linked to the
sort of abuses that took place at Abu Ghraib.
Documents obtained by the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) reveal that Lt General
Ricardo Sanchez authorised techniques such as the use
of dogs to intimidate prisoners, stress positions and
disorientation. In the documents, obtained under the
Freedom of Information Act, Gen Sanchez admits that
some of the techniques would not be tolerated by other
countries.
When he appeared last year before a Congressional committee,
Gen Sanchez denied authorising such techniques. He has
now been accused of perjury.
The ACLU says the documents reveal that the abuse of
prisoners in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere was the
result of an organised and co-ordinated plan for dealing
with prisoners captured during the so-called war on
terror that originates at the highest levels of the
chain of command. It says that far from being isolated
incident, the shocking abuse at Abu Ghraib that was
revealed last year was part of a pattern.
"We think that the techniques authorised by Gen
Sanchez were certainly responsible for putting into
play the sort of abuses that we saw at Abu Ghraib,"
Amirit Singh, an ACLU lawyer, told The Independent on
Sunday. "And it does not
just stop with Sanchez. It goes to [Defence Secretary
Donald] Rumsfeld, who wrote memos authorising these
sorts of techniques at Guantanamo Bay."
In the September 2003 memo, Gen Sanchez authorised
the use of 29 techniques for interrogating prisoners
being held by the US. These included stress positions,
"yelling, loud music and light control" as
well as the use of muzzled military dogs in order to
"exploit Arab fear of dogs". Some of the most
notorious photographs to emerge from the Abu Ghraib
scandal showed hand-cuffed, naked Iraqi prisoners cowering
from snarling dogs.
Six weeks after Gen Sanchez issued his memo, a subsequent
directive banned the use of dogs and several of the
other techniques following concerns raised by military
lawyers. The ACLU says that at least 12 of the techniques
listed in the memo went beyond the limits for interrogation
listed in the US Army's field manual.
"Gen Sanchez authorised
interrogation techniques that were in clear violation
of the Geneva Conventions and the army's own standards,"
said Ms Singh. "He and other high-ranking officials
who bear responsibility for the widespread abuse of
detainees must be held accountable." [...]
When he appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee
in May 2004, Gen Sanchez flatly refused approving such
techniques in Iraq, and said that a news article reporting
otherwise was false. "I never approved any of those
measures to be used ... at any time in the last year,"
he said under oath. The ACLU accuses
him of committing perjury and has asked the Attorney
General to investigate. [...]
Gen Sanchez is currently commanding general of the
US V Corps based in Germany. He has yet to comment on
the release of the memo. A Pentagon spokesman declined
to comment.
The Pentagon originally refused to release the memo
on national security grounds, but passed it to the ACLU
after the group challenged it in court. Mr Rumsfeld
last week dismissed suggestions that it had been withheld
to save the Pentagon's embarrassment.
But the ACLU said the reason for the
delay in delivering the more than 1,200 pages of documents
in which the memo was contained was "evident in
the contents", which included reports of brutal
beatings and sworn statements that soldiers were told
to "beat the f*ck out of" prisoners. |
FORT CARSON, Colo. (AP) -- Previously
secret court testimony indicates that an Iraqi general
imprisoned by U.S. forces was badly bruised and may
have been severely beaten two days before he died of
suffocation during interrogation.
References to the alleged beating appear in a transcript,
released under court order, from a preliminary military
hearing for three soldiers charged with murder and dereliction
of duty in the death of Maj. Gen. Abed Mowhoush on Nov.
26, 2003. A fourth soldier faces the same charges but
waived a hearing.
During the interrogation, Army prosecutors
said, Mowhoush was put headfirst into a sleeping bag,
wrapped with electrical cord and knocked down before
the soldiers sat and stood on him. The cause of death
was determined to be suffocation.
The defendants -- Chief Warrant Officers Lewis Welshofer
and Jefferson Williams, Sgt. 1st Class William Sommer
and Spec. Jerry Loper -- have all denied wrongdoing.
They said commanders had sanctioned
their actions.
According to the transcript, witnesses said others
had also beaten Mowhoush days before the Army interrogation.
Their names and the names of their
agencies were blacked out.
Col. David A. Teeples, the men's commander, said during
the closed hearing: "My thought was that the death
of Mowhoush was brought about by . . . [blacked out]
and then it was unfortunate and accidental, what had
happened under an interrogation by our people."
According to the transcript, Army special investigator
Curtis Ryan testified that he found extensive bruising
when he examined Mowhoush shortly after he died. "So,
at some point prior to the 26th, he had been beaten,"
Ryan said.
An autopsy revealed that Mowhoush
had also suffered broken ribs, testimony showed.
The military closed the hearing to the public shortly
after it began in December, but the Denver Post successfully
sued to open it, and the proceeding was concluded this
week in open court. The transcript was released Thursday
and posted on the Internet.
Fort Carson's commander, Maj. Gen. Robert Mixon, will
decide whether the soldiers are to be court-martialed,
after he receives a recommendation from the investigating
officer, Capt. Robert Ayers. No timetable was set. |
Fury
at 'shoot for fun' memo
Outburst by US security firm in Iraq is attacked by
human rights groups |
Mark Townsend
The Observer
Sunday April 3, 2005 |
One of the biggest private security
firms in Iraq has created outrage after a memo to staff
claimed it is 'fun' to shoot people.
Emails seen by The Observer reveal
that employees of Blackwater Security were recently
sent a message stating that 'actually it is "fun"
to shoot some people.'
Dated 7 March and bearing the name of Blackwater's
president, Gary Jackson, the electronic newsletter adds
that terrorists 'need to get creamed, and it's fun,
meaning satisfying, to do the shooting of such folk.'
Human rights groups said yesterday that the comments
raised fresh questions over the role of civilian contractors
operating in Iraq and other world flashpoints.
'We are very concerned about the increased use of security
companies, there needs to be more inspection and regulation
of these companies,' said a spokesman for Amnesty International.
Blackwater has already been the subject of lobbying
efforts to introduce tighter regulations on private
military operations in Iraq.
It is one of the fastest growing private
security firms in the world, and achieved global prominence
last year when four of its men were ambushed by a crowd
of Iraqis and their bodies mutilated and dragged around
the Iraqi city of Falluja.
The controversial wording of the Blackwater bulletin
appears to be an attempt to criticise the 'righteous
outcry' that followed a recent statement from a senior
US Marine general who, on returning home from Iraq,
claimed it was 'fun to shoot some people'. While
the views of Lieutenant-General James Mattis drew a
frosty response from the Pentagon, others said his observations
reflected the harsh realities of war. [...]
Among its various roles in post-war
Iraq, Blackwater has guarded provincial outposts for
the Iraqi coalition provisional authority and had the
contract to keep former chief US envoy Paul Bremer alive.
The company has been praised for its role in the rescue
of a wounded soldier in Najaf. Defence experts have
described Blackwater as a major player in the field
of private arms with an important role to play in aiding
American security in the war on terror.
Other Blackwater emails seen by The Observer, from
last year, indicate the large market for civilian contractors
in war zones. 'We will probably require at least 3000-4000
professionals above and beyond what we have in the Blackwater
employment and resource system,' states one. [...] |
BAGHDAD, April 3 (AFP)
- At least 44 US soldiers and 12 prisoners were wounded
in a 40-minute assault by dozens of fighters on the
notorious US-run Abu Ghraib jail outside Baghdad, the
US military said.
"What we had was a well
coordinated attack of 40 to 60 insurgents on Forward
Operating Base Abu Ghraib," said Lieutenant
Colonel Guy Rudisill, the spokesman for US detention
operations in Iraq.
The fighting kicked off at 7:00 pm (1500 GMT) as the
sun began to set when a car bomb exploded at the prison's
southeast corner, followed by rocket-propelled grenades,
small arms and mortar fire, Rudisill said.
"Some of the fire was from nearby buildings."
A second car bomb went off soon after somewhere on
the prison's northern side, as the insurgents pressed
their assault, he added.
US soldiers returned fire with automatic weapons and
50 millimetre calibre shells, while three Apache attack
helicopters were deployed overhead but did not open
fire, Rudisill said.
At least one insurgent was killed,
he added. [...]
The attack may well have been an attempted jail break.
It follows a 40-50 man rebel ambush on a US military
convoy south of Baghdad on March 20. [...] |
The Army apologised
yesterday for raiding the home of a prominent MP from
Basra and arresting his family. Officers blamed an intelligence
blunder.
But the apology has done little to quell the fury of
southern Shia MPs, who warned that good relations between
the British and Iraqi officials could suffer as a result
of Monday night's botched raid.
Army officers did not explain how they mistook Mansour
Abdulrazzaq Mansour, one of the British Army's closest
allies in Iraq's second city, for an insurgent.
The MP, a member of the Shia coalition, said British
tanks and helicopters surrounded his house before soldiers
blew open the front door with explosives.
"They smashed the windows of
the cars parked in the garage, smashed the computer
to the ground and took $260,000 from the house,"
said Mr Mansour, who comes from one of southern Iraq's
wealthiest families.
"The reason for the violation of my immunity has
not been explained and my money has not been returned.
I demand compensation." He said his children were
also detained and had been left scarred by the experience.
"Basically we are very
sorry," a spokesman said from the Army headquarters
in Basra. "We made a mistake, we apologise for
it and we will do our best to make sure something like
this does not happen again." All 11 members of
Mr Mansour's family had been released.
It is unclear whether the soldiers raided the wrong
house or genuinely believed Mr Mansour, who is the leader
of the Tamimi tribe, was connected to the insurgency.
The gaffe was compounded by the fact that the British
military had provided a helicopter to fly Mr Mansour
to Baghdad for the second meeting of the national assembly
just hours before the raid.
Southern politicians were vitriolic in their condemnation
of the raid. "Generally, the people of Basra like
the British," said Muntasir al-Imara, an MP from
Basra. "Unlike the Americans, they have morals
and are kind to people so we feel comfortable with them.
But this behaviour terrifies us.
"Unless they give us a proper explanation for
behaving like criminals and offer adequate compensation,
relations could become very bad." |
BAGHDAD, April 3 (Xinhuanet)
-- Iraqi lawmakers elected Sunni Arab politician Hachim
al-Hassani as speaker for the National Assembly (parliament)
on Sunday, marking the first step toward forming a new government
after months of deadlock.
With the absence of 43 members, including the outgoing
Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, the newly elected lawmakers
convened for the third time more than two months after
the landmark elections.
At least one explosion was heard near the Green Zone,
where the session was being held, but there was no immediately
report where it took place and if there was any casualty.
Lawmakers voted in a secret ballot on the five candidates
nominated by the parliament blocs and Hassani garnered
215 votes, which enabled him to get the post.
Hussein al-Shahristani, a Shiite nuclear scientist,
got 157 votes and became the first deputy speaker and
the second deputy was Tariq Tayfor, a Kurd who won 96
votes.
The expected result came after the winning Shiite list
issued anultimatum for the Sunni lawmakers to accept Hassani,
the incumbent industrial minister more favored by the
Shiites.
Sunni politicians previously preferred to nominate Meshaan
al-Jubouri to take the post, but had to have his name
withdrawn as a compromise to the complain about his link
to the toppled regime.
The parliament ended its second session last week but
failed to agree on the three posts, and the prolonged
horse-trading negotiation has provoked anger among Iraqis.
Iraqi voters who had braved suicide
attacks on Jan. 30 to go to polling stations have been
disappointed by the failure to form a transitional government.
Despite the appointment of the speakers, the parliament
will still have to debate over the candidacy for the country's
president and the cabinet. |
WASHINGTON - Iraq
under Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to the United
States, but it did to Israel, which is one reason why
Washington invaded the Arab country, according to a
speech made by a member of a top-level White House intelligence
group.
Inter Press Service uncovered the remarks by Philip
Zelikow, who is now the executive director of the body
set up to investigate the terrorist attacks on the US
in September 2001 - the 9/11 commission - in which he
suggests a prime motive for the invasion just over one
year ago was to eliminate a threat to Israel, a staunch
US ally in the Middle East.
Zelikow's casting of the attack on Iraq as one launched
to protect Israel appears at odds with the public position
of US President George W Bush and his administration,
which has never overtly drawn the link between its war
on the regime of Saddam and its concern for Israel's
security.
The administration has instead insisted it launched
the war to liberate the Iraqi people, destroy Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and to protect the
United States.
Zelikow made his statements about "the unstated
threat" during his tenure on a highly knowledgeable
and well-connected body known as the President's Foreign
Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB), which reports directly
to the president. He served on the board between 2001
and 2003.
"Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear
weapons against us? I'll tell you what I think the real
threat is and actually has been since 1990 - it's the
threat against Israel," Zelikow told a crowd at
the University of Virginia on September 10, 2002, speaking
on a panel of foreign policy experts assessing the impact
of September 11 and the future of the war on al-Qaeda.
"And this is the threat
that dare not speak its name, because the Europeans
don't care deeply about that threat, I will tell you
frankly. And the American government doesn't want to
lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not
a popular sell," said Zelikow.
The statements are the first to surface from a source
closely linked to the Bush administration acknowledging
that the war, which has so far cost the lives of nearly
600 US troops and thousands of Iraqis, was motivated
by Washington's desire to defend the Jewish state.
The administration, which is surrounded by staunch
pro-Israel, neo-conservative hawks, is currently fighting
an extensive campaign to ward off accusations that it
derailed the "war on terrorism" it launched
after September 11 by taking a detour to Iraq, which
appears to have posed no direct threat to the US.
Israel is Washington's biggest ally in the Middle East,
receiving annual direct aid of US$3-4 billion.
Even though members of the 16-person PFIAB come from
outside government, they enjoy the confidence of the
president and have access to all information related
to foreign intelligence that they need to play their
vital advisory role. Known in intelligence circles as
"Piffy-ab", the board is supposed to evaluate
the nation's intelligence agencies and probe any mistakes
they make. The unpaid appointees on the board require
a security clearance known as "code word"
that is higher than top secret.
The national security adviser to former president George
H W Bush (1989-93) Brent Scowcroft, currently chairs
the board in its work overseeing a number of intelligence
bodies, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the
various military intelligence groups and the Pentagon's
National Reconnaissance Office.
Neither Scowcroft nor Zelikow returned numerous phone
calls and e-mail messages from IPS for this story.
Zelikow has long-established ties to the Bush administration.
Before his appointment to PFIAB in October 2001, he
was part of the current president's transition team
in January 2001. In that capacity, Zelikow drafted a
memo for National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice
on reorganizing and restructuring the National Security
Council (NSC) and prioritizing its work.
Richard A Clarke, who was counter-terrorism coordinator
for Bush's predecessor president Bill Clinton (1993-2001)
also worked for Bush senior, and has recently accused
the current administration of not heeding his terrorism
warnings. Clarke said that Zelikow was among those he
briefed about the urgent threat from al-Qaeda in December
2000.
Rice herself had served in the NSC during the first
Bush administration, and subsequently teamed up with
Zelikow on a 1995 book about the unification of Germany.
Zelikow had ties with another senior Bush administration
official - Robert Zoellick, the current trade representative.
The two wrote three books together, including one in
1998 on the United States and the Muslim Middle East.
Aside from his position on the 9/11 commission, Zelikow
is now also director of the Miller Center of Public
Affairs and White Burkett Miller Professor of History
at the University of Virginia. His close ties to the
administration prompted accusations of a conflict of
interest in 2002 from families of victims of the September
attacks, who protested his appointment to the investigative
body. [...]
Others say that the administration should be blamed
for not making known to the public its true intentions
and real motives for invading Iraq. "They
the administration made a decision to invade Iraq, and
then started to search for a policy to justify it.
It was a decision in search of a policy and because
of the odd way they went about it, people are trying
to read something into it," said Nathan Brown,
professor of political science at George Washington
University and an expert on the Middle East.
But he downplayed the Israel link. "In
terms of securing Israel, it doesn't make sense to me
because the Israelis are probably more concerned about
Iran than they were about Iraq in terms of the
long-term strategic threat," he said.
Still, Brown says that Zelikow's words carried weight.
"Certainly his position would allow him to speak
with a little bit more expertise about the thinking
of the Bush administration, but it doesn't strike me
that he is any more authoritative than Deputy Secretary
of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, or Rice or Secretary of State
Colin Powell or anybody else. All of them were sort
of fishing about for justification for a decision that
has already been made," Brown said. |
From Washington,
the rhetoric calls for diplomatic solutions to the nuclear
standoff with Iran. But Tehran also hears a growing
drumbeat for war that echoes the build-up to US invasions
of Afghanistan and Iraq.
In preparation for any strike on its budding nuclear
facilities, Iran is making clear that the price will
be high - burnishing its military forces, boosting its
missile program, and warning of a painful response against
US and Israeli targets in the region.
"They see a fight coming,
regardless of what they do, so they are getting ready
for it," says a European diplomat in Tehran,
referring to ideologues who think a US invasion is a
"very real prospect." Even moderate conservatives
fear the "Iraqization of the Iran dossier,"
says the diplomat. The result is that Iran is "constantly
trying to project strength" and is developing a
new doctrine of asymmetric warfare.
President Bush, who included Iran in his "axis
of evil," has called speculation about a strike
"ridiculous," but says all options are open.
Earlier this month, the US added modest incentives of
WTO membership and spare aircraft parts to bolster Britain,
France, and Germany as they negotiate with Iran over
its nuclear program. But the US last week refused to
consider a security guarantee, as proposed by the head
of the UN's nuclear watchdog agency.
Experts say Iran has many assets to draw upon in case
of attack:
• Iran has been upgrading its Shahab-3 missile,
which can reach Israel and US forces in the region.
Iran's armed forces have conducted high-profile military
exercises since last fall.
• Iran is reported to have set up sophisticated
air defenses around its nuclear facilities. US officials
in February said pilotless US drones had been sent from
Iraq since last year to sample the air for traces of
uranium enrichment. Iran has confirmed that it is excavating
deep underground tunnels to protect some nuclear facilities.
• Ukraine's new pro-West lawmakers are investigating
"smuggled" shipments of a dozen Soviet-era
Kh-55 cruise missiles - designed to carry a 200-kiloton
nuclear warhead 1,860 miles, virtually undetectable
by radar - to Iran in 2001. A Russia-Iran satellite
launch deal is to provide digital maps for more accurate
targeting, according to Moscow analyst Pavel Felgenhauer.
• Western diplomats are raising concerns that
Iran is "quietly building a stockpile" of
sophisticated military equipment, such as 2,000 armor-piercing
sniper rifles and night-vision goggles, acquired through
legal purchases as well as under a UN anti-drug program,
the Associated Press reported last Friday.
Beyond this, civilian hard-liners have been recruiting
suicide bombers to kill US troops in Iraq, or Israelis.
Though derided by some officials as not serious, by
last June 15,000 had signed up, according to Knight-Ridder.
"It is code to America: 'If you hit us, we will
play dirty, using Hizbullah and volunteers to hit the
US across the region," says the European diplomat,
echoing analysts who note that Iran can swiftly destabilize
Iraq, activate militant cells, and close the Strait
of Hormuz to oil traffic. "There is an enormous
danger of miscalculation."
That possibility, and the examples of US-engineered
regime change in Afghanistan and Iraq, are causing Iran
to hedge its bets.
"If I was a student of [Prussian military strategist
Karl von] Clausewitz, I would do as the US does: I would
talk incentives, and [at the same time] design a theater
of war against the enemy," says Abbas Maleki, a
former deputy foreign minister who heads the Institute
for Caspian Studies in Tehran.
In response, says Mr. Maleki, Iranians are focusing
on three possibilities: a surgical strike on nuclear
facilities; a three-month rolling air attack; and a
six-month "troops on the ground" option.
"Iran must be very, very cautious to avoid any
attack," says Maleki, who maintains ties to Iran's
leadership. "We have conventional weapons designed
for neighboring threats like Saddam Hussein and the
Taliban - not to fight a superpower. But we must defend
ourselves."
Talking up that defense is almost daily news in Iran,
where supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei says Iranians
are "accustomed to the harsh and threatening language
of the enemy," and told Iranian nuclear officials
last week to ignore US threats and continue their work.
The Revolutionary Guards "must be ready all the
time," he said, "to stand up to ... acts of
bullying."
Analysts say any military action by the US could boost
unpopular conservatives.
"Iranians are very patriotic, and though there
is a lot of dissatisfaction with the regime, they oppose
an attack," says Nasser Hadian-Jazy, a political
scientist at Tehran University with close ties to the
Khatami government. "It would be like Sept. 11
in the US, which brought the neocons into power. A US
attack could bring our neocons into power."
Many experts agree that a military attack aimed at
nuclear sites could propel Iran's leadership to kick
out UN inspectors and withdraw from the nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty (NPT).
As a signatory of the NPT, Iran has
been relatively cooperative so far. Despite numerous
Iranian reporting violations, and delays visiting certain
sites, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
says its inspectors have found no evidence of a weapons
program.
Adding to concern in the West, the Asian Wall Street
Journal reported last week that US intelligence has
received tens of thousands of pages of Farsi-language
designs and test data, dated from 2001 to 2003, to modify
the Shahab-3 missile to carry a "black box"
that, the report says, US experts "believe is almost
certainly a nuclear warhead."
Similar leaks about Iraq's alleged
weapons activities prior to the invasion proved crucial
to making the case for war, but were later disproved.
The Journal reports that US officials first thought
"the find might be disinformation,
perhaps by Israel," but "are now persuaded
... the documents are real."
A complete 14-month reassessment of US intelligence
on WMD threats ordered by the White House, and using
pre-war errors about Iraq as a case study - is to be
presented to President Bush Thursday. A lengthy classified
section is reported to have found serious gaps in US
knowledge of Iran's programs. [...]
Ironically, any
strike could bury Iran's already weakened moderates.
"This action will really work against democracy
and reformers in Iran, and I believe the Americans know
that," says Mostafa Tajzadeh, a former deputy
interior minister and adviser to Khatami. "If
we are pessimists, we would say they want hard-liners
to [solidify] control." |
CARACAS, April 2 (Xinhuanet)
-- Venezuela refuted on Saturday a recent US accusation
of its arms deal, reiterating that the country's new purchase
of arms and military equipment from abroad is a "legitimate,
sovereign and uncontested act."
Venezuela will use the arms for a superior mission which
is peace, Defense Minister Jorge Garcia said, rejecting
once again US criticism that its purchase of weapons would
imply an arms race in South America.
The minister emphasized Venezuela as a country that
is renowned in the world for keeping strictly with the
purpose of peace, "collaborating with its neighbors
and with whoever needs help."
The official defined the country's military mission
as safeguarding borders, patrolling and operations against
smuggling,drug-trafficking and other forms of crime.
Last month, the Venezuelan government signed an agreement
with the Russian state-run firm Rosoboronexport to buy
10 helicopters, as well as 100,000 AK-103 and AK-104 assault
rifles.
Venezuela also signed a deal with Spain to buy transport
planes, a sphalt-transport vessels and patrol boats. Venezuelan
President Hugo Chavez made a statement in defense of the
deal after visitingSpanish Prime Minister Jose Rodriguez
Zapatero signed the agreements on Wednesday.
He said the military equipment will help Venezuela strengthen
its defense capacity and combat smuggling, drug-trafficking
and international crimes.
US Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld on Wednesday
criticizedVenezuela's purchase of 100,000 AK-47 assault
rifles from Russia,suggesting that Venezuela's possession
of so many weapons would pose a threat to the hemisphere.
Tensions between Venezuela and the United States have
been escalating amid exchanges of hostile rhetoric, in
which Chavez accused Washington of planning to assassinate
him. |
TALLAHASSEE -- It's
illegal to shoot someone just because they threaten
you in a supermarket checkout line, at a football game
or on the street.
But under a proposed law swiftly
moving through the Florida Legislature, people who think
their lives are in danger outside their home
will be immune from prosecution
if they fight back.
Critics say if the law becomes reality
Florida could become reminiscent of the Wild West.
The law would allow people who feel they are under
attack to "meet force with force" under immunity
from prosecution or civil lawsuits. Under the provision
you could punch someone who punches you or even kill
someone you think is about to kill you.
The proposed law received approval from the House of
Representatives on Thursday with opposition mostly from
Democrats who feared it could make everyone in the state
trigger-happy.
Rep. Ari Porth, D-Coral Springs, questioned whether
the law would lead to death over even the most frivolous
disagreements, such as trying to check out 15 items
in a supermarket's 10-items-or-less lane.
If one person in line challenges another, and they
get in a heated argument that escalates to threats,
he asked, what could happen?
"Can I then pop a cap on him, proceed to check
out with my 15 items and then ask for cleanup on aisle
three?" Porth, a prosecutor, asked.
Rep. Dennis Baxley, who sponsored the bill, said the
intention is not to increase violence, but to allow
people to defend themselves without fear of being charged
with a crime.
"If you have a reasonable fear of death or bodily
harm then you have the right to protect yourself,"
said Baxley, R-Ocala. "I think many people delay
because they're not really confident that they're not
going to be in trouble." [...]
Rep. Jack Seiler, D-Wilton Manors, said the most dangerous
aspect of the bill is that it takes self-defense outside
people's homes and into the streets, meaning real criminals
might escape jail time.
"We've gone beyond the home,
we've gone beyond the occupied vehicle and we've taken
it, as we heard today, to shopping markets, into stadiums,
into bars," he said. "We've taken it everywhere.
We've taken current law and extended it so far that
criminals will not be prosecuted. Everyone of them is
going to raise as a defense that, 'I was attacked first."
[...] |
Another earthquake of moderate
intensity measuring 5.0 on the Richter scale was recorded
off the coast of the Indonesian island of Sumatra tonight.
The quake, which was epicentred at 0.5 degrees north
latitude and 97.2 degrees east longitude, occured at 2255
hrs.
It follows another temblor, measuring 5.5, which occured
earlier today.
The first earthquake, at 1607 hrs IST, was epicentred
at 2.7 degree north latitude and 96.7 degree east longitude,
an IMD release said. |
Another earthquake
of moderate intensity, measuring 6.1 on the Richter Scale,
was recorded off the western coast on North Sumatra this
morning.
The quake, which was epicentered at 2.2 degrees north
latitude and 97.6 degrees east longitude, occurred at
0841 hrs IST, an Indian Meteorological Department(IMD)
release said.
It follows two temblors, measuring 5.2 and 5.7 on the
Richter Scale, which occurred early this morning.
The first quake, occurred at 0348 hrs IST, was epicentred
at 3.4 degrees north latitude and 92.6 degrees east longitude
of the west coast of the Indonesian island, the release
said.
The second quake occurred at 0629 hrs IST and was epicentred
at 3.4 degrees north latitude and 92.6 degrees east longitude
off the Indonesian island. |
TEHRAN, Iran Apr 3, 2005
- A moderate earthquake shook southeastern Iran early Sunday,
injuring at least 24 people, state-run television reported.
The broadcast said the 4.1 magnitude earthquake jolted
Ravar, 560 miles southeast of the capital, Tehran, at
about 3 a.m. local time. No heavy property damage was
reported.
Iran is located on seismic fault lines and is prone to
earthquakes. More than 600 people were killed by a 6.4
magnitude quake that hit central Iran on Feb. 22. |
MANILA -- A moderate
earthquake shook Manila and outlying regions on Sunday,
but officials reported no injuries or damage.
The epicenter of the magnitude-5.3 earthquake, off Mindoro
island south of the capital, was too deep to cause any
damage, government seismologist Vilma Hernandez said.
It was triggered by movement of the Manila trench, located
off the Philippines' western coast, she said.
Aside from Manila, the quake was also felt in Mindoro's
resort town of Puerto Galera and nearby Cavite province
and Tagaytay city, she said.
The Philippines is in the Pacific "Ring of Fire,"
where earthquakes and volcanic activity are common.
A magnitude-7.7 earthquake in 1990 killed nearly 2,000
people on the island of Luzon. |
BEIJING - Calling
all tech-savvy pandas -- China's biggest nature reserve
in the foggy mountains of southwest Sichuan province
is now wired for broadband.
Some might argue that the Wolong Giant Panda Nature
Reserve, China's largest, is now ready for the world's
first panda internet cafe, but the great digital leap
forward is aimed more at panda protection.
Researchers are able to process real-time data on the
pandas, including photos and video signals, around the
clock at any given corner of the nature reserve, or
observe giant panda cubs on a daily basis without having
to step out of their offices," Xinhua said. [...] |
A
Jesus doll that quotes the Bible at the push of a button
is the star of a Messengers of Faith collection set
to be released in June by a Valencia-based company that
hopes the secular market is ready for the toys.
Also part of the series are Barbie-size Moses, David
and Virgin Mary dolls, being developed by the Beverly
Hills Teddy Bear Co. in Valencia, which already markets
a teddy bear that sings "Jesus Loves Me."
"It's been on my heart to do these for at least
three or four years," said the company's founder
and executive officer David Socha. "We
are targeting the inspirational market, to do good things
for children, something that adds to their quality of
life and doesn't corrupt their minds. Our company has
always created very conservative products."
The dolls' creators believe the market is ready for
the toys, adding they will spark a forum for discussions
in households about God and faith.
The 12-inch poseable figures, meant for children 4
to 10, also are collectors items and will sell for $24.99.
Each doll is numbered. A child
can push a button in the doll's back, and the doll will
recite Scripture, Socha said.
Socha also said he expects some controversy, judging
by the response the film "The Passion of the Christ"
sparked before its release and the subsequent discussions
about the power of the religious right. [...]
But some in the religious community
said society may be ready for the dolls, adding that
the toys will become great education tools. [...]
Socha acknowledged that the dolls would first be marketed
toward the religious communities, both Christian and
Judaic. Some dolls still to be produced include Esther,
a ancient Hebrew queen, and Peter, Jesus' apostle. And
he said they will not likely sell them at Toys 'R' Us.
"This is a chance for the Christian child to have
a very high-quality toy," Socha said. "Our
company has a strong reputation and I think people who
know our company know that this is at the heart of who
we are." |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|