|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
|
"My
sovereignty says you don't send missiles up over my airspace
unless I'm there." - Canadian PM Martin arguing
for Canada's participation in the US Missile Defence Plan
2003
|
Good Fences make Good Neighbors |
SOTT |
This well known idiom was first
written by Robert Frost in his famous poem "Mending
Walls" from 1954. The story concerns two neighbors,
one young and the other old, who try to come to terms
with their relationship over the mending of a fence
that separates their two properties. According to some
interpretations, the younger man rails against the walls,
seeing them as an intrusion against nature, whereas
the older, wiser neighbor sees the fence as a necessary
dividing line between their lives, or the expanse across
generations. In mending the wall, the two come to a
better understanding of the perspectives of the other.
A more literal interpretation of the phrase might include
seeing the fence as a well established border that acts
to separate and identify the sovereign territory of
each neighbor. The "wall" that divides them
also exists as a metaphor highlighting the uniqueness
and separate identity of each party, resulting in a
respect for each other's land and personal space. In
this way, one can see that the fence, while indeed a
man-made creation that seems to go against nature, can
also serve as the link between them as they work together
to mend the wall. In this light, it seems, good fences
do indeed make good neighbors.
As was reported
last week by many North American mainstream newspapers,
a high level think tank composed of representatives
from Canada, the U.S., and Mexico emerged from their
meeting with a document declaring that their three countries
should work towards "a joint security perimeter"
that would include a common biometric passport and integrated
terror lists, among other Orwellian agendas. It is not
surprising that these initiatives were lauded by the
corporate business community who, if they had their
way, would have the countries share one common
currency.
The scenario of Canada becoming the 51st state is nothing
new, and appears to have been part of the Global Elite's
plan for some time. Considering that the United States
seems destined to play the role of military superpower
and fascist aggressor during these "end times",
just like Nazi Germany in WWII, the closeness with which
America's northern and southern neighbors align to the
Bush government's murderous policies may in a large
way affect how the end result is realized. The geographical
proximity of Canada and Mexico to the U.S. does not
bode well for either country, for the States have enough
resources and firepower to preemptively invade and occupy
both countries without expecting much resistance. So,
it seems logical that this scenario must be kept in
mind should plans for a legal integration and assimilation
of North America be resisted by the governments or the
people of either country.
As the U.S. continues to pursue its hegemonic agenda
in the Middle East and to work to provoke war in the
region with the help of Israel, there is every possibility
of another major terrorist attack on American soil designed
specifically to inflame the masses in anger against
the next Muslim country on the chopping block. It also
seems likely that it could be "engineered"
that the attacker snuck in across the border from either
Canada or Mexico in order to involve those countries
in the war on terror as well. Such a large-scale attack
would likely have the effect of the U.S. declaring temporary
martial law, suspending Congress and the Constitution,
and installing Bush as supreme leader for life. The
mechanisms are already in place for such a police state
scenario, and all it would take is for some kind of
nuclear or bio-terror attack against a soft target to
make it happen.
If Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and Mexican
President Vincente Fox were visionary leaders who could
see beyond purely economic interests, both would be
wise to start siding with France, Germany and the European
Union in all matters pertaining to security and economics.
Despite sharing "the longest undefended border
in the world", Canada might consider following
Asian countries like China, India and Japan, as they
gradually unhitch themselves from the U.S. dollar and
switch over to the Euro. They would also be wise to
strongly resist American pressure to join any future
coalition against terrorism in the Middle East, no matter
how the inevitable false-flag operation implicates their
country in the process. Lastly, they might well benefit
from opening their borders to American citizens who
will start waking up in greater numbers to Bush's Apocalyptic
plans and begin flocking to their nearest neighbor for
safe haven.
As the reader will no doubt see from the articles that
follow, these ideas we present are by no means easy
to accomplish. In fact, steps have already been taken
to ensure that many such proposals are never allowed
to become a reality. With a joint "terrorism and
defense" policy, for example, it will be extraordinarily
easy for the US to have the Canadian government ship
any US deserters or "terrorists" who seek
asylum in Canada back to the US. There will be nowhere
to run, and nowhere to hide.
On the other hand, one never knows what effect even
a few flapping butterfly wings may have on the course
of history. Perhaps the real question is: How long will
the people in various countries around the world put
up with governments who quite obviously do not have
their best interests at heart? More importantly, will
there be any other options left to the masses when they
realize what is happening and finally decide to act?
If we are to heed the words of Robert Frost, that "good
fences make good neighbors", then in regards to
the United State's relationship to Canada and Mexico,
the bigger and stronger the fence, the better. |
WACO, TEXAS - Prime Minister Paul
Martin has signed a pact with the presidents of the
United States and Mexico to boost co-operation on security,
trade and public-health issues.
The agreement, forged as Martin met with U.S. President
George W. Bush and Mexican President Vicente Fox in
Texas on Wednesday morning, will
see the three countries increase their border security,
and integrate their approaches to cargo inspection and
maritime and aviation safety.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America
agreement also aims to make their markets more competitive
with the European Union and China by:
• Standardizing some business regulations.
• Making it easier for business people to cross
borders.
The deal, meant to complement pacts such as the North
American Free Trade Agreement, calls for a continental
strategy to block "threats to public health and
the food and agriculture system."
"We face new opportunities but we also face new
challenges, and this requires a renewed partnership
– [a] stronger, more dynamic one that is focused
on the future," Martin said at a news conference
after the so-called "Three Amigos Summit"
at a university in Waco, Tex.
"We are determined to forge
the next generation of our continent's success. That's
our destination. The security and prosperity partnership
that we are launching today is the road map to getting
there."
Leaders play down recent disputes
Relations between the United States and the other
two countries have been strained in recent years. Irritants
have included the U.S. decision to close its border
to Canadian cattle in 2003; the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq the same year, which neither Canada nor Mexico
backed; and Canada's recent decision
not to participate in the U.S. missile-defence shield,
which reportedly left Bush
furious.
However, all three leaders appeared
friendly at Wednesday's news conference and dismissed
any talk of tensions among them.
"I'm amazed that we don't have more, whatever you
call, 'sharp' disagreements" because the three
countries are so interconnected, said Bush.
He referred to Martin as "Paul" after the
first face-to-face meeting between the two leaders since
the missile-defence decision, hinting at a friendlier
bond than he had with former prime minister Jean Chrétien.
"I think the relationship is very strong and
very positive," Bush said. "Just because somebody
doesn't agree with our policies doesn't mean we can't
have very positive relationships."
Martin said "the file is closed" on ballistic
missile defence, but took pains
to highlight that Canada was co-operating with the United
States on other military efforts.
"The defence of North America is not only going
to take place in North America. Canada is playing an
increasing role – as an example, in Afghanistan
– and that's also part of the defence of North
America." [...] |
OTTAWA - An opposition party that
is helping to keep Canada's minority Liberal government
in power angrily accused Prime
Minister Paul Martin on Tuesday of planning to push
an agenda of closer integration with the United States.
[...]
But the idea of any deeper integration with the United
States is particularly unpopular with Canada's left-leaning
New Democrats, who have been backing Martin since last
June's election stripped the Liberals of their majority.
"Can the prime minister tell us why he will be
pursuing an agenda of deeper integration with the U.S.,
sacrificing Canadian sovereignty? Why is he pursuing
this hidden agenda without telling Canadians about it?"
the party's leader, Jack Layton, asked in Parliament.
Martin dismissed Layton's questions, saying that,
at the Texas meeting, he would be pressing for greater
security and economic prosperity for the three nations.
Last week, a task force of former U.S., Mexican and
Canadian officials recommended building a North American
economic and security community by 2010, and proposed
a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter.
Canadian officials played down the report, saying
the ideas put forward would not be on the agenda in
Texas. |
WACO, Texas (CP) - Prime Minister
Paul Martin signed a deal Wednesday that provides for
sweeping co-operation with the United States and Mexico
on security, economic and health issues, but
there was no sign of progress on touchy trade disputes.
[...]
While Martin thanked Bush for supporting Canada on
resuming the cattle trade, now held up in the courts
by a protectionist U.S. ranchers' group, he took pains
to mention the softwood dispute at a joint news conference.
Bush appeared somewhat frustrated
by it, saying he knew all about the issue.
"I've heard about it since I became president."
But formally, there was a positive spin on Canada-U.S.
relations after Ottawa upset Bush by staying out of
the U.S. missile defence program. [...]
The less formal get-together at the ranch, Martin's
first visit, was seen by observers as a tonic for hard
feelings from policy and trade disagreements.
Bush, who mentioned U.S. interest
in oil from the Alberta tar sands, marked the
summit by giving the prime minister a pair of black
cowboy boots embossed with the initials PM and the flags
of the three countries.
The beginnings of the comprehensive agreement signed
by the leaders were hatched in 2001 at the Summit of
the Americas in Quebec City.
It calls for a tri-national energy strategy, more
intelligence-sharing and common plans for responding
to disasters and emergencies, drug smuggling,
illegal migrants and organized crime.
It also seeks a continental strategy to deal with
air and water quality, infectious diseases and threats
to the food and agriculture system.
Called the Security and Prosperity Partnership, the
accord lets any two countries move on an issue while
allowing the third to join later. Cabinet ministers
will work on the details and report back within 90 days,
and then twice a year.
The leaders are also committed to meeting regularly,
said Martin.
The plan has ignited passionate response from nationalists
who worry it will eat away at Canada's sovereignty.
Martin disputed concerns from critics
that the plan would lead to a European Union-style integration
with a common currency and customs union.
"The answer is No," he said. "What
we are talking about here is not a big bang; we're talking
about big progress."
His comments were echoed by Fox and Bush.
"We've got a lot of trade with each other and
we intend to keep it that way," the U.S. president
said. "We've got a lot of crossings of the borders
and intend to make our borders more secure and facilitate
legal traffic."
Said Fox: "We are talking about a partnership;
that is the key word. All of us have a sense of urgency.
We want to make North America the most competitive area
in the world."
The Council of Canadians called it
a "big step in the wrong direction."
"This is just a big-business
grocery list," said president Maude Barlow. "There
is no concrete action to improve the lives of citizens
as every single measure is geared to please the corporate
sector.
"This initiative will lead
to the erosion of Canadians' civil rights, the destruction
of regulatory standards and practices designed to protect
Canadians from unsafe food and drugs and the eventual
surrender of precious resources," she predicted.
[...] |
We need much closer integration
with the United States -- before
it's too late
For more than 70 years, Canadians have profited from
a close and mutually beneficial economic and security
relationship with the United States, to the point that
we assume it will never end. To
make such an assumption is a grave mistake. In
present global circumstances, nothing can be taken for
granted.
Canada has much to learn from the European experience.
The now 25 members of the European Union have worked
assiduously to create the kind of beneficial interdependence
that serves as a model of statecraft. They have done
this by writing rules and building institutions to underwrite
their great project and provide their citizens with
the confidence that it will continue. Co-operation,
shared experience and acceptance of common rules have
become the basis of both European sovereignty and unity.
[...] Rightly or wrongly, the U.S. no longer regards
its northern border benignly. In
a nation grown anxious about when and where terrorists
may strike next, the border now looms as a point of
vulnerability rather than a source of strength, a perception
increased by the Martin government's decision not to
participate in the ballistic missile defence initiative.
Such a perception cannot be allowed to continue.
It undermines the very basis of Canada's security and
prosperity: cross-border trade and investment drive
our economy; U.S. innovation and entrepreneurship propel
our own; the U.S. military provides
a blanket of security; U.S. intelligence is critical
to our own; U.S. popular culture dominates because Canadians
choose it; and U.S. warm weather cossets millions
of Canadians each winter. The U.S. presence pervades
every aspect of Canadian life because we welcome it,
we benefit from it, and we want it to continue. Canadians
can justly take pride in their distinctiveness,
but there is no other country with which we are as closely
aligned in our core values: respect for democracy, human
rights, and the rule of law.
[...] The point comes home quickly if we devote just
a few minutes to thinking about the next possible terrorist
outrage. As the 9/11 commission in the United States
has pointed out, it is not a question
of whether, but when. It
could be a dirty bomb in a sports stadium. It could
be a truck bomb destroying the CN Tower in Toronto.
Or it could be ricin in the water supplying Los Angeles.
Wherever the terrorists strike next in North America,
our vulnerability will be made clear within minutes.
The border will close. This time, it may not be reopened
as quickly as it was after 9/11. The next outrage will
bring fear and determination to new levels. And the
first instinct will be to circle the wagons.
Such scenarios tend to be dismissed
by many Canadians as scare tactics. That too
is a mistake. We must coolly assess the risks as well
as the benefits of our unchangeable geographic proximity.
The choice is as stark as it is clear. When
the wagons circle, do Canadians want to be on the outside
looking in or the other way around? To ask the
question is to answer it. The implications for our economic
security will far exceed those for the U.S.
The first task that faces us
is to restore the belief in American hearts and minds
that Canada is a reliable partner. That is how most
Canadians want to be seen, and it is how most Americans
used to feel. Drift and neglect in our relationship
have diminished the trust and confidence we used to
take for granted on both sides of the border. The government's
decision to opt out of missile defence has not helped.
We know that the U.S. remains ready to work with us.
The President has made that clear. We should respond
quickly and forcefully and undo the damage of the past
decade of wilful neglect.
We must restore trust by addressing
our common security needs and by strengthening our common
North American security perimeter, as the tri-national
task force co-chaired by former deputy prime minister
John Manley recommended last week. Within that
perimeter, people should be able to move freely, but
on both sides of the 49th parallel there is work to
be done, and it is best done jointly and co-operatively
rather than singly and at possible cross purposes. A
long history of working together, from NORAD and NATO
to the Smart Border accord, has created a strong foundation,
but far more needs to be done to confront the growing
obstacles we now face, some of our own making, and some
the result of a changing strategic context. The February
budget made a start at modernizing and revitalizing
the Canadian Forces, but to regain our ability to participate
fully in the defence and security of Canada and North
America, much more is required. [...]
George W. Bush is not the issue.
Canadians need to get on with life and recognize the
absolute necessity, in our own self-interest, of building
a modern security relationship and of securing access
to the market that drives our prosperity. To do otherwise
is foolish and reckless.
Over the past three years, there has been a vibrant
debate in Canada on the details of what we need to do.
There is no shortage of good ideas, but adopting a bold,
realistic and holistic approach to relations with our
giant neighbour to the south requires a government prepared
to exercise leadership. Nor can the agenda be adopted
piecemeal. Thanks to the role of special interests in
Washington, nothing will be accomplished by attempting
incremental bites. The U.S. political system has never
worked that way, and never will.
Mr. Bush's invitation to Paul Martin and Mexican President
Vicente Fox to meet with him to discuss the future of
North America provides a golden opportunity to make
clear that Canada wants to work with the United States
to build a zone of mutual confidence and a community
of law. We must articulate and pursue our broad political
goals. We call on our political
leaders to commit Canada to a course that will secure
our future. If they allow the relationship to continue
to drift, Canadians could judge them harshly. History
certainly will.
Allan Gotlieb was Canada's
ambassador to the U.S. from 1981 to 1988; Wendy
Dobson is a professor at the University of Toronto's
Rotman School of Management; and Michael Hart is the
Simon Reisman chair in trade
policy at Carleton University. |
OTTAWA (CP) - Canadians are giving
Prime Minister Paul Martin an overwhelming thumbs up
for his refusal to join the U.S. missile defence project,
a new poll suggests.
The numbers offer some vindication for Martin as he
heads into a meeting Wednesday with U.S. President George
W. Bush armed with Canadian public sentiment on his
side. The prime minister angered
the White House and drew scorn from critics at home,
but two-thirds of poll respondents - 57 per cent compared
to 26 per cent - supported him, according to
the survey by Decima Inc.
A Canada-U.S.-Mexico summit in Texas will be the first
meeting between Martin and Bush since last month, when
the prime minister tried informing the president of
his decision and waited days before having his phone
call returned.
U.S. officials said Bush was angered
by Martin's failure to convey Canada's decision face-to-face
when the two men met in Brussels late last month.
The Decima poll indicates Martin would have flown
into a public opinion hurricane had he decided to take
part in Bush's missile program.
Virtually every constituency in the
country approved of Canada's stand - from teenagers
to senior citizens, men and women, urban and rural dwellers,
and a majority of respondents in every single province.
Just one group fell outside the statistical norm:
Conservative party supporters sided 49 per cent to 35
per cent in favour of joining the missile project.
Pollster Bruce Anderson says
opposition to the plan has little to do with missile
defence and a lot to do with opposition to Bush's foreign
policy, particularly his prosecution of the war in Iraq
as well as White House trade policies. [...]
Here are some other findings of the survey of 1,023
Canadians, conducted March 10-14 and considered accurate
within 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20:
-Lack of confidence in Bush
(34 per cent) was the main
reason given by the those
asked to explain their support for Martin's decision.
The second-most common reason given was frustration
over U.S. handling of the softwood lumber and mad-cow
disputes, as 21 per cent agreed "Canada shouldn't
co-operate with the U.S. until the U.S. treats Canada
more fairly." [...] |
Danger
Up North
Canada's welcome mat for terrorists. |
March 21, 2005, 8:30 a.m.
By Deroy Murdock |
Let's hope Honduras is awash in
American agents. Al Qaeda's Abu Musab al-Zarqawi reportedly
has dispatched Islamo-fascist murderers to penetrate
the U.S. via Tegucigalpa, where bribe-hungry authorities
allegedly sell passports to smooth passage through Mexico
to the human highway known as the U.S.-Mexican border.
But American officials better eye the northern frontier,
too. Canadians seem rather relaxed
about some who inhabit the land nestled between Alaska
and the Lower 48. While most Canadians are as friendly
as Labrador retrievers, that attitude is not universal.
"I'm not afraid of dying, and killing doesn't
frighten me," Algerian-born Canadian Fateh Kamel
said on an Italian counterterrorism intercept. "If
I have to press the remote control, vive the jihad!"
Kamel, who jet-setted among Afghanistan, Bosnia, Saudi
Arabia, and Turkey, was arrested in Jordan on December
15, 1999, and extradited to France. He was convicted
of distributing bogus passports and conspiring to blow
up Paris Metro stations. He was sentenced April 6, 2001,
to eight years in prison.
But after fewer than four years, France sprang Kamel
for "good behavior." (What is it about iron
bars and German shepherds that mellows people so?) Kamel
flew home to Canada January 29.
"When Kamel arrived in Montreal, the RCMP [Royal
Canadian Mounted Police] was not even at the airport
to greet him," Canada's National Post reported
last month. "As far as they're concerned, he is
an ex-convict who has done his time and has committed
no crimes in Canada."
Kamel now freely strolls Canada's
streets. That's just fine, so long as he limits his
violence to moose hunting and such. But what if he has
humans - Americans, even - in his crosshairs?
"We should be looking at him and possibly sending
him back to Algeria," Conservative-party deputy
leader Peter MacKay said in the February 27 Toronto
Star. "There is a strong circumstantial case right
now to suggest this guy isn't deserving of Canadian
citizenship." MacKay sees
Kamel as emblematic of Ottawa's peaceful, easy feeling
toward terrorist killers. "What
crossed my mind was that the French authorities wanted
him out of the country, and we were all too willing
to take him in."
Kamel
is not alone. Canada crawls with terrorists, suspected
violent extremists, and folks worthy of 24-hour surveillance.
"There have been a number of instances where
Canadians or individuals based here have been implicated
in terrorist attacks or plans in other countries, at
least a half dozen or more in the last several years,"
Canadian Security and Intelligence Director Jim Judd
told a Canadian Senate panel in Ottawa March 7.
"There are several graduates of terrorist training
camps, many of whom are battle-hardened veterans of
campaigns in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Chechnya and elsewhere
who reside here...Often these individuals remain in
contact with one another while in Canada or with colleagues
outside of the country, and continue to show signs of
ongoing clandestine activities, including the use of
counter-surveillance techniques, secretive meetings,
and encrypted communications." Among
other things, Canadian-based terrorists have aspired
to whack a visiting Israeli official, bomb a Jewish
district in Montreal, and sabotage an El Al jet over
Canada. [...]
Algerian-born Ressam, a failed Montreal refugee applicant
and suspected Fateh Kamel protégé, was
caught by U.S. Border Patrol on December 14, 1999, at
Port Angeles, Washington after crossing the Canadian
frontier in an explosive-laden car. He dreamed of ringing
in the millennium by blowing up Los Angeles International
Airport.
"CSIS was aware of him since 1995 and was surveilling
him, but they never put him out of business," the
National Post's Stewart Bell, author of last year's
Cold Terror: How Canada Nurtures and Exports Terrorism
to the World, told journalist Bill Gladstone. "On
the other hand, the second he entered the United States,
he was stopped, arrested, and turned into a very good
government informant." In his book, Bell writes:
"Canada has tried to smother
terrorism with kindness...Its most valuable contribution
to the war on terrorism may well be its terrorists."
Canadian Zaynab Khadr flew from Islamabad, Pakistan
to Toronto February 17 with her daughter, age 4 1/2,
and teenage sister. She joined her mother and brother,
Karim, who returned to Canada last April. Karim was
wounded when Pakistani forces raided a suspected al-Qaeda
hideaway. Her Egyptian-born father, who was killed in
that attack, previously had been arrested in Islamabad
after a 1995 Egyptian embassy truck bombing. Another
brother, Abdurahman, returned to Canada in December
2003. He told Canadian Broadcasting
that he grew up in an "al-Qaeda family." (To
be fair, he briefly worked for the CIA.) [...]
Harvey Kushner, author of the hair-raising counterterrorism
best-seller Holy War on the Home Front, is less sanguine.
"It's quite disturbing that Canada's immigration
policies have let this situation fester and grow,"
he says. "We do not have an electrified fence.
When you have a neighbor who is not on the same page,
it's indeed troublesome."
What can America do about all this? Pressing the Canadians
to tighten up may require constant engagement. Amplifying
the calls of Canada's Tories for stricter immigration
and easier deportation would help. For starters, President
Bush should broach border security when he meets his
North American counterparts in Mexico on March 23.
The warm U.S.-Canadian relationship, illustrated by
our 3,145-mile unprotected boundary, cooled somewhat
when Ottawa recently refused to help Washington develop
defenses against incoming nuclear-tipped missiles. But
that modest dispute will pale beside the northward-flowing
rancor that will erupt if a terrorist attack kills innocent
Americans, and U.S. officials discover that the butchers
slipped past complacent Canadians.
- Deroy Murdock is a New York-based columnist
with the Scripps Howard News Service and a senior fellow
with the Atlas Economic Research Foundation in Fairfax,
Va. |
OTTAWA (CP) - Terrorists and other
suspected security threats tried to move twice as much
money through Canada last year as they did the year
before, says a federal watchdog.
But the dramatic annual jump probably reflects
better detection rather than a spiralling terrorist
threat, says Horst Intscher, director of the
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre,
better known as Fintrac.
When final figures are in for fiscal 2004-05, which
ends March 31, terror-related
cash washing through Canada will likely be twice the
previous year's total of $70 million, Intscher
told the Commons finance committee. [...]
That primarily reflects a growing maturity in the
agency, he said.
Authorities in the United States
have also complained that Canadian privacy laws have
hamstrung efforts to track large sums of money that
terrorists or other criminals might be moving across
the border.
A recent U.S. State Department report said American
officials have concerns that privacy laws and the high
standard of proof required by Canadian courts "inhibit
the full sharing of timely and meaningful intelligence"
on suspicious financial transactions. [...] |
Ottawa - The union representing
Canada's border guards is urging the federal government
to establish an armed border patrol to fill what it
says are egregious security gaps at hundreds of unguarded
Canada-U.S. border crossings.
In a speech to be delivered before the Commons justice
committee Tuesday, Ron Moran, head of the 10,500-member
Customs Excise Union, chastises Public Security Minister
Anne McLellan for understating the frequency with which
vehicles drive through border crossings without first
passing through customs. [...] |
Somebody, somewhere,
deserves the highest award given for brilliant planning
and manipulation. The award should be given to whomever
planned the events of 9-11 and then so brilliantly manipulated
Americans into believing that nineteen "Arab terrorists"
pulled the whole thing off. This
notion of nineteen "Arab terrorists" is absurd,
of course, to anyone with any critical thinking skills.
Unfortunately, and apparently, that doesn't apply to
very many Americans. Most
of these same Americans also happen to be religious.
It's not a coincidence.
Those who adhere to religious
doctrine agree to a mandatory forfeiture of all critical
thinking skills the moment they climb aboard the Holy
Wagon. It's not an option with religion, because
you cannot accept religion as truth and still retain
the courage to question it. If you disagree with that,
you're a perfect example.
How does religion have anything to do with 9-11? Religion
itself isn't the point - it's the mindset of religious
people, who have allowed themselves to believe a doctrine
which their subconscious mind tells them is ludicrous.
The official version of 9-11 says that nineteen "Arab
terrorists" planned, financed, and executed the
most improbable event in American history, all by themselves.
This is beyond ludicrous. Who
are perhaps the most ardent believers in Bush's official
story of 9-11? Religious people, because they have been
conditioned to believe the impossible, so long as an
authority figure tells them it's true.
Nobody with critical thinking skills can possibly believe
the official story of 9-11, especially with the mountain
of contradictory evidence readily available to everyone.
The same is true of religion. That's the whole problem
with so many Americans. They have been raised to believe
whatever comes out of the mouth of the guy up front
in the church. He wears a fancy robe, sometimes with
a pretty sash or a big hat, and he is obviously in charge
of the church - from childhood, they are conditioned
to tremble at his voice. In such an environment, it
doesn't take long to eventually erase any inclination
to question the authority figure. Toss in a few even
bigger authority figures, such as a Jesus, a God, and
some disciples, and how dare you question authority?
It's actually quite brilliant, to be honest about it.
My own opinion is that the Roman leader Constantine
recognized the enormous potential for crowd control
which is inherent in religion, and he utilized it to
perfection. When he proclaimed Christianity to be the
official religion of Rome, he effectively sentenced
the minds of his people to death. This is no trivial
matter, at a time when Rome was the most dominant nation
in the known world. Most of the population was uneducated
beyond knowing not to defy the emporer. How many generations
would it take before everyone was gone from the pre-Constantine
"Christianity" days? Not very many, and then
you'd be left with fresh generations to program from
birth. It's brilliant, and it worked.
The problem is not religion as a whole. The problem,
again, is the conditioning program that is religion.
With religion, minds are closed to a genuine search
for truth. Minds are caged like simple animals, to be
fed by their handlers. Having
the courage to question religion means eternity in some
burning dungeon of torture and punishment. Being raised
from childhood with this mentality being forced upon
them, religious people simply no longer have the ability
to question. It almost warrants pity, if the
consequences weren't so devastating in today's world.
Flashback to 9-11: four passenger planes are hijacked
simultaneously, with no response from an air defense
system that is known for its jumpy preparedness. In
the past, a single hijacking anywhere in America would
have resulted instantly in at least some semblence of
response. On this day, however, four airplanes are hijacked
and left to do as they please, untouched and unchallenged.
Three of these planes are allowed to proceed through
the most heavily-guarded airspace in the world. Two
of them are left free to continue their course into
the World Trade Center towers, being flown with a skill
far above even the most experienced fighter pilots.
The towers subsequently crumble exactly as a building
does in a controlled demolition, even when burning jet
fuel gets nowhere near hot enough to melt the steel
of the towers. A third hijacked
airplane supposedly crashes into the Pentagon, but leaves
no sign of something as large as a passenger jet having
done the damage.
Does any of this raise even
a single question? Apparently not, as most Americans
simply believe that nineteen "Arab terrorists"
did it. No questions, no investigation, no doubts.
It's just so much easier to blame people who we don't
understand at all. Different
religion, different culture, different everything, and
they live on the other side of the world, so we don't
even have to blame them to their faces. Besides, our
president said they did it, so there you go.
America's response? Go to Afghanistan, bomb it into
submission, and install a powerless puppet regime. The
poppy fields, which the Taliban had all but eradicated,
are replanted with vigour and encouragement, ensuring
a healthy supply of heroin on the market. Next, go to
Iraq, completely destroy its infrastructure, drop uranium
bombs everywhere so future generations can die, too,
kill multitudes of young Americans, maim the rest, teach
them how to torture prisoners and enjoy it, and take
control of Iraq's oil as we sit by and watch looters
pillage and destroy irreplaceable ancient historical
artifacts. But that oil supply is safe.
Bush blamed, ummm....well, he
blamed somebody, generally categorized as "the
terrorists". Since then, Americans have given it
no more thought. Bush said "the terrorists"
did it, so that's all there is to it. If you disagree,
you are accused of aiding "the terrorists"
(a concept that defies all logic). Americans
are more than happy to say they support the troops,
but they don't even understand why the troops are in
Iraq. Neither do the troops. The accepted slogan is
"to defend our freedom". Defend our freedom
from whom? Iraqis? Defend our freedom from the Iraqi
military that had no weapons of mass destruction? Defend
our freedom from the Iraqis in general, who had been
starved for a decade with sanctions? Protecting our
freedom from whom? People who don't even understand
the who/what/why of 9-11 are suddenly afraid for their
precious freedoms. That's insane, but insanely typical.
And they protest the war in Iraq, but they don't protest
the whitewashing of 9-11 by this administration. Screw
the war in Iraq - your country was attacked in cold
blood, and somebody very nearby had a hand in it.
When a vast majority of a population
has already been dutifully programmed by religion, and
thereby stripped of its ability to question and use
critical thought, an event such as 9-11 is a godsend
(no pun intended) to any powerful group that would use
such an event to further its agenda. Who profits
from the war in Afghanistan? Who profits from the war
in Iraq? Who profits more than
Israel if we topple Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria,
etc? And the question that preceeds them all:
who profits from 9-11 itself? These are questions that
demand answers and accountability, but they are questions
not being asked.
Religion set the stage for using 9-11 to further an
agenda, and whomever organized 9-11 recognized that
fact. Brilliant in its depravity, this group of planners
realized how easy it is to manipulate religious people
who already willingly adhere to irrational and disproven
dogma. The brilliance was in using their own religious
trinkets and icons in the charade. There should be an
award given to whoever concocted the idea of wrapping
Bush around a Bible to further the agenda.
Is religion to blame for 9-11? Absolutely not. Are
the people who refuse to question 9-11 to blame for
it? Absolutely, because people who refuse to question
something, regardless of its glaring irrationality,
encourage it to continue.
|
On
the morning of september 11th, 2001 the FBI visited
at least two private businesses near the pentagon and
confiscated several security camera video tapes.
Business #1 is the cigto gas station with several security
cameras aimed in the direction of the pentagon. Flight
77 flew directly over the gas station at an altitude
of roughly 50 feet, less than 3 seconds from impact.
Business #2 is the sheraton national hotel.
It is known, based upon a prior FOIA report filed by
CNN which requested the tapes - that the
sheraton's security cameras DID capture the plane -
however because of national security, the FBI won't
release the video.
No one can say for sure why the FBI is reluctant to
release the videos. It could just be a matter of policy,
or it could have to do - as many suspect - with the
notion that keeping the videos from the public is helping
to fuel wild conspiracy theories. These theories - that
no 757 hit the pentagon - helps discredit the 9/11 truth
movement in general, and keeps people's focus away from
such topics as WTC building 7. [...]
3/9/5 Yesterday the lawsuit was filed, and today the
FBI was served.
Also, today we got a response to the FOIA appeal. i
haven't seen it yet, but i'm told it says that the FBI
does have the tapes, however won't release them because
the release would interfere with an ongoing investigation.
[...]
I can't imagine how any one can make such a justification
- i mean, we know what we're going to see, which is
something not unlike what we saw with the WTC towers
attacks. How can viewing the the final moments of flight
77 interfere with some investigation? It was in the
air low, it flew past the sheraton, over the citgo gas
station, clipped some light poles and then crashed.
I can't imagine what the problem would be with seeing
that.
UPDATE 3/12/5 I just got the lawsuit and the DOJ appeal
response from my attorney and i have yet to copy it
for this site. but will do so early next week.
The appeal response has a nice tone, stating that it's
really out of their control that they can't release
the videos. Perhaps it's the case that they would really
like us to have them, but need something like a judge's
permission to bend their policy. or it could be some
other reason. [...]
I think what's great about this lawsuit is that already
it's bringing both sides of the 757/no-757 issue together.
even if you believe with all your heart that no 757
hit the pentagon, you still have to agree with this
effort to obtain the videos. finally, both sides of
this crazy story can agree on something.
It even bridges those who believe the official version
VS those who don't - because getting the videos is getting
a step closer to the truth. It turns the static down
for all sides equally. |
This special Mother
Jones investigation late last year detailed how, only
weeks after 9/11, the Bush administration set up a secret
Pentagon unit to create the case for invading Iraq.
Here is the inside story of how they pushed disinformation
and bogus intelligence and led the nation to war.
[...] Lt. Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski is perched on a
plastic chair, wearing shorts, a purple sweatshirt,
and muddy sneakers. Two scrawny dogs and a lone cat
are on the prowl, and the air is filled with swarms
of ladybugs.
So far, she says, no investigators have come knocking.
Not from the Central Intelligence Agency, which conducted
an internal inquiry into intelligence on Iraq, not from
the congressional intelligence committees, not from
the president's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board.
All of those bodies are ostensibly looking into the
Bush administration's prewar Iraq intelligence, amid
charges that the White House and the Pentagon exaggerated,
distorted, or just plain lied about Iraq's links to
Al Qaeda terrorists and its possession of nuclear, biological,
and chemical weapons. In her hands, Kwiatkowski holds
several pieces of the puzzle. Yet she, along with a
score of other career officers recently retired or shuffled
off to other jobs, has not been approached by anyone.
Kwiatkowski, 43, a now-retired Air Force officer who
served in the Pentagon's Near East and South Asia (NESA)
unit in the year before the invasion of Iraq, observed
how the Pentagon's Iraq war-planning unit manufactured
scare stories about Iraq's weapons and ties to terrorists.
"It wasn't intelligence
-- it was propaganda," she says. "They'd
take a little bit of intelligence, cherry-pick it, make
it sound much more exciting, usually by taking it out
of context, often by juxtaposition of two pieces of
information that don't belong together."
It was by turning such bogus intelligence into talking
points for U.S. officials -- including ominous lines
in speeches by President Bush and Vice President Cheney,
along with Secretary of State Colin Powell's testimony
at the U.N. Security Council last February -- that the
administration pushed American public opinion into supporting
an unnecessary war.
Until now, the story of how the Bush administration
produced its wildly exaggerated estimates of the threat
posed by Iraq has never been revealed in full. But,
for the first time, a detailed investigation by Mother
Jones, based on dozens of interviews -- some on the
record, some with officials who insisted on anonymity
-- exposes the workings of a secret Pentagon intelligence
unit and of the Defense Department's war-planning task
force, the Office of Special Plans. It's the story of
a close-knit team of ideologues who spent a decade or
more hammering out plans for an attack on Iraq and who
used the events of September 11, 2001, to set it into
motion. [...] |
American and Iraqi
authorities say they have killed 85 insurgents and captured
what they called a major rebel training and command
centre. US forces provided air and ground support for
the 90-minute operation in a remote area between Tikrit
and Samarra.
US and Iraqi military spokespeople said the camp was
the base for waves of car bombings in cities in northern
Iraq. Among the insurgents killed, they said, were Sudanese,
Algerians, Syrians and Saudis. Seven
Iraqi police commandos were also killed. But a rebel
group, the Islamic Army in Tikrit, claimed they were
in charge of the camp and although 11 "freedom
fighters" were killed, "many more" soldiers
were among the dead.
Major Richard Goldenberg, of the US 42nd Infantry Division,
said: "Documentation at the facility [camp showed]
that some of the anti-Iraqi forces [rebels] were foreign
fighters. There were no US casualties."
The Iraqi government has introduced strict residency
rules to detain and expel foreign Arabs, which has led
to widespread protests. The crackdown is purportedly
aimed at people suspected of aiding the insurgency.
But many among those arrested
- more than 200 in one day in Baghdad alone - have been
long domiciled in Iraq and face the prospect of being
uprooted.
The Palestinian community feels particularly
under threat. Large numbers have lived in Iraq for generations
but find themselves in the firing line because of the
supposed Palestinian support for the Saddam regime.
The Palestinians say they have nowhere to go. Many of
their original homes are under Israeli control and there
is little chance of Israel allowing them to return.
Others, such as Sudanese Arabs, also say they are victimised
by the new rules. Differentiated by their darker complexions
and African features, they also claim to be intimidated
by Iraqi police and soldiers at roadblocks. Chechens
and Iranians have also been arrested in the raids. The
border with Iran is particularly porous and many extended
families, Iraqis as well as Iranians, have relations
in both countries.
Most of the foreign residents originally possessed
valid documents from a time when Iraq's oil wealth offered
relatively well-paid work. But the documents are now
deemed to be invalid if they have not returned to their
home countries to renew their passports and entry visas,
a difficult task in a land racked by years of conflict
and shackled by United Nations sanctions. And even if
a foreigner has a work contract, the Ministry of Work
and Social Security has the power to cancel it if the
job can be done by an Iraqi.
Iraqi officials seem unwilling to drop their new hard
line. Brigadier-General Taif Tariq Hussein, the head
of the interior ministry's residency office, said: "Some
Arabs and foreigners have destroyed the reputation of
Arab and foreign countries in Iraq. They have either
helped in executing sabotage operations or they have
carried out sabotage." Parts of the Iraqi media
have been vocal in supporting the tough measures. One
of the main Baghdad newspapers, Al Taakhi, carried a
front-page story headlined "Life sentence for the
illegal Arab residents".
Inflammatory graffiti has also begun to appear on the
walls of Baghdad saying, "Arabs out of Iraq"
and "We back the government - Arabs go home". |
BAGHDAD, : At least 30 people,
including a U.S. soldier and Iraqi army officer, died
in separate incidents around Iraq Tuesday, security
sources said.
In the northern city of Mosul, Iraqi police killed
17 insurgents and captured 11 others in gunfights following
an aborted assassination attempt on a police officer.
In Baghdad, an officer was killed and two others were
injured in the explosion of a road side bomb, while
the explosion of ammunitions that belonged to the old
Iraqi army in Biji, 200 kilometers (125 miles) north
of Baghdad, killed three Iraqis,
including two women, and injured 6 others, among them
two children.
Also Tuesday, four women and
three children were killed in Aziziya in the explosion
of a bomb believed to be leftover from the 2003 U.S.
invasion.
In the oil center of Kirkuk in north Iraq, Brig. Mohsen
Hazzaa died Tuesday from wounds he suffered in an assassination
attempt two days earlier. |
WASHINGTON - The Army expects to
miss its recruiting goals this month and next and is
working on a revised sales pitch appealing to the patriotism
of parents, Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey said Wednesday.
Whether that boosts enlistment numbers or not, Harvey
said he sees no chance
of a military draft.
"The 'D' word is the farthest
thing from my mind," the former defense company
executive told a Pentagon news conference, his first
since becoming the Army's top civilian official last
November.
Because of the military manpower strains caused by
simultaneous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, some in Congress
have raised the possibility of re-instituting the draft,
although there is a strong consensus against it among
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and the military
chiefs.
This is the first time the United
States has been in a sustained period of combat since
the all-volunteer force was introduced in 1973.
The Air Force and Navy, which have relatively smaller
roles in Iraq and Afghanistan, have no recruiting problems,
but the Army and Marines are hard pressed.
The Army missed its recruiting
goal for February by 27 percent, and that was
the first time it had missed a monthly goal since May
2000. The last time it missed its full-year goal was
1999. [...]
The Army is forecasting that
all three elements - active, Guard and Reserve - will
fall short of their targets for March and April.
That means they will have to make up the lost ground
this summer - traditionally the best recruiting season
- in order to meet their full-year goals.
"I'm clearly not going to give up," Harvey
said. "At this stage we still have six months to
go" before the recruiting year ends Sept. 30. "I've
challenged our human resource people to get as innovative
as they can. And even as we speak we've got a number
of new ideas."
One of those new approaches is designed
to persuade more parents to steer their children to
the Army.
"We're going to appeal to
patriotism," he said. [...]
In a related matter, the Army
said more people in the Individual Ready Reserve - those
no longer in uniform and not obligated to train - are
going to be hearing from the Army in the weeks ahead.
The Army has revised upward the number of IRR soldiers
it plans to put on active duty, from the 4,402 announced
last summer to 4,653. Of those given mobilization orders
so far, 370 have failed to report for duty, according
to Lt. Col. Pamela Hart, an Army spokeswoman. An additional
2,229 have asked for delays in their reporting dates
or for exemptions. [...]
Harvey also disclosed that the
Army is "looking at" changing its policy on
having more than one sibling in a combat zone at the
same time. He did not say how the policy might
be altered, and he declined to say more about the subject,
other than to indicate that it came up when he visited
the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany, where
wounded U.S. troops are treated. [...] |
KABUL (AP) - American warplanes
killed five suspected Taliban militants in repelling
nighttime attacks near the Pakistani border, the military
said, while U.S.-led troops fatally
shot an Afghan boy during a search for a bomb-maker
Wednesday.
Gen. James Jones, NATO's supreme operational commander
who was ending a visit, described such attacks as "random
acts of violence" typical of the war-wrecked country,
but insisted Taliban and al-Qaida holdouts are not a
serious threat.
"I don't think we're facing anything that remotely
resembles an organized insurgency," Jones told
reporters at Kabul airport after meeting with President
Hamid Karzai to discuss plans for NATO's 8,500-member
contingent to relieve U.S.-led forces in western Afghanistan.
Taliban-led militants are still operating along the
mountainous eastern border with Pakistan despite the
presence of 17,000 American soldiers more than three
years after toppling the religious militia for harbouring
Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida terrorist operation.
There has been a string of recent incidents, including
two bombings in southern Kandahar last week that killed
five civilians and damaged three UN vehicles.
But U.S. commanders insist the militants are a fading
force.
In Tuesday night's battle, planes scrambled after
insurgents shot at least eight rockets at a U.S. base
near Khost, a city 145 kilometres south of Kabul, and
rained rockets and gunfire on three Afghan border posts,
officials said.
"Coalition aircraft killed five insurgents,"
a U.S. statement said, adding that American troops also
responded with artillery fire. No U.S. or allied forces
were hurt, it said. [...] |
Sheep are ill and dying on the
day following the discovery of poison pellets on the
land outside the Palestinian town of At -Tuwani adjacent
to the illegal Israeli settlement outpost of Havot Ma'on.
Two sheep are dead and others are ill. The amount of
sheep affected remains unknown.
Palestinians have also found two dead gazelles in
the area. Villagers fear that a well has been contaminated.
The poisoning is yet another
incident in a pattern of attacks in this area.
Early Tuesday morning March 22, a Palestinian shepherd
from At-Tuwani discovered poison pellets spread over
the hillside outside the town in the South Hebron hills.
The turquoise blue pellets appear to be barley soaked
with rodent poison. At least 30 dunam of land has been
affected and the villagers fear that the poison may
be in other areas as well.
Israeli police were called upon discovery of the poison.
The villagers were informed by the police that an investigator
from the settlement of Ma'on has been assigned to the
case.
The village is also concerned about a communal well
in the area where the pellets were found. In
the past an At-Tuwani well was poisoned with carcasses
of dead chickens.
This malicious act not only affects the economic livelihood
of the local farmers, it could have grave impact on
the wildlife in the area.
The local Palestinian people along with internationals
in the village are currently attempting to clean up
the contaminated site.
This is yet another incident in a
series of attacks and harassment in the South Hebron
hills. On Saturday March 19 twelve settlers attacked
Palestinian farmers. On the same day approximately 100
settlers paraded onto Palestinian land dancing and singing
while trampling crops. Over the last six months internationals
living in the area have been beaten on three separate
occasions by settlers from the Havot Ma'on outpost.
|
Fabien
Barthez says he will not travel with teammates to Israel
next week for game because of IDF's activity in the
occupied territories
France's national soccer team top goalie slammed Israel
on Thursday, saying he refused to travel with his teammates
to a planned match with Israel's national team
next week because of the the Israeli army's actions
against Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.
"When I see all the suffering
in the world, I don't understand why they would
want to play in Israel," Fabien Barthez
told a news conference in Paris.
The French goalie also slammed Israel's operations
in the Palestinian territories, saying: "I don't
like it at all. I am speaking as a father and not as
a soccer player." |
Human
rights groups in Ireland are calling on Irish national
soccer team supporters to boycott a World Cup qualifying
match against the Israeli national team.
The organizations asked fans to refrain from making
the trip to Israel for the May 26 match, and have also
asked the Irish Football Association to boycott the
game entirely due to the political situation between
Israel and the Palestinian Authority.
Irish national team fan club Chairman Alan Hunter said
the Irish soccer association was never apprehensive
about fighting for justice, but added that he welcomes
the latest developments regarding the Arab-Israeli peace
initiative.
"There is no reason to evoke fear, as long as
the fans themselves are not afraid," he said.
'Israel is not Yugoslavia'
Hunter mentioned that in 1999 Irish fans demanded
the cancellation of a scheduled home game against Yugoslavia
during that country's invasion of Kosovo.
"It's not a good idea to bring politics into
the football pitch, and, in any case, I don't
believe the fans will heed the call for a boycott,"
he said. "One cannot compare Israel to Yugoslavia.
The proportions are completely different."
As of now, some 500 Irish fans are expected to arrive
in Israel on board charter flights for the match. Some
of the travel deals even include tours of Irish pubs
in Israel . |
Teacher abuses mentally
ill children, family members; judges criticize local
authorities
JERUSALEM - The Jerusalem District Court sentenced
a 37-year-old Talmud (Oral Law) teacher of mentally
challenged students to a 12 year prison term Wednesday
for acts of sodomy and sexual misconduct involving teens
and children.
The teacher, who is currently divorced without children,
mainly molested family members, including his nephew,
who was 10-years-old at the time.
Investigators found dozens of naked photos of children
on his personal computer.
The teacher, who grew up in New York, arrived in Israel
to study in a Yeshiva; he later returned to the U.S.
to complete his degree in Computer Science, but came
back to Israel to teach children with learning disabilities
and serve as a boarding school counselor.
The teacher told welfare services that a summer camp
instructor had sexually assaulted him when he was 11
years-old. |
UNITED NATIONS - France on Wednesday
presented a U.N. resolution allowing for the prosecution
of Sudanese war crimes suspects at the International
Criminal Court, forcing the United States to choose
between accepting a body it opposes or casting a politically
damaging veto.
The Security Council has been deadlocked for weeks
on the issue of holding people accountable in Sudan,
drawing criticism that it has become mired in haggling
while conflict continues to rage in the country's western
Darfur region.
The United States circulated three Sudan resolutions
Tuesday - one authorizing a peacekeeping force, another
imposing sanctions, and a third tackling the issue of
where to punish those responsible for atrocities. It
said a vote on the final issue would have to be put
off because of the divisions in the council over the
court.
But France, Britain and others were
determined to handle the issues at once.
At a closed council meeting Wednesday, the United States
first introduced the resolution to deploy peacekeepers
on which there is broad council agreement.
France's U.N. Ambassador Jean-Marc
de La Sabliere then introduced a draft resolution that
would refer Darfur cases since July 1, 2002 to the International
Criminal Court. That was the recommendation of a U.N.
panel that had found crimes against humanity - but not
genocide - occurred in Darfur.
"We've gone to great lengths to make sure that
the text on the table is one that was most likely to
be acceptable or at least not objectionable to any colleagues,"
Britain's U.N. Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry said.
In a clear concession to the United
States, the resolution said citizens of countries that
have not ratified the treaty establishing the ICC who
take part in operations in Sudan wouldn't be subject
to prosecution by the court.
The United States is not party to the court, and objects
to the world's first permanent war crimes tribunal in
part because it fears its citizens could face politically
motivated prosecutions.
"The United States position on the International
Criminal Court is well-known and unchanged," said
Richard Grenell, spokesman for the U.S. Mission, refusing
to elaborate. The United States
has in the past said it opposes any variant that would
refer Sudan cases to the court, even if there was an
exception made.
If the vote on the resolution goes ahead, the United
States will have to decide whether to exercise its veto
or abstain.
A veto could be politically damaging
because it would give the appearance that the United
States opposed the punishment of those responsible for
atrocities in Darfur, where the number of dead from
a conflict between government-backed militias and rebels
is now estimated at 180,000. The United States itself
has declared genocide has occurred in Darfur and demanded
swift action.
Meanwhile, council members expressed widespread support
for the American draft resolution to send a 10,000-strong
U.N. peacekeeping force to Sudan. They would monitor
a peace accord that ended a 21-year civil war between
the government and southern rebels that is unrelated
to Darfur. [...] |
WASHINGTON - The budget deficit
has overtaken terrorism as the greatest short-term risk
to the U.S. economy, and concern about the current gap
is rising, a survey of U.S. businesses shows.
In a survey of 172 members of the National Association
for Business Economics, 27% said the deficit or government
spending is the largest short-term threat to the economy,
up from 23% who thought so in August.
Terrorism dropped to second
on the list, with 24% saying it is the biggest threat,
down from 40%. Those most
concerned about the deficit in the current account -
the largest measure of U.S. trade with other nations
- tripled, to 15% from 5% in August.
"Longer term, the costs related to the aging of
the population dominate the challenges to sustaining
economic growth. However, the panel is doubtful that
this Congress will pass needed Social Security reforms,"
said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor's,
who conducted the analysis for the report.
Concerns about energy costs rose to 11% from 6%, while
just 6% saw inflation as the biggest short-term threat,
down from 9% in August. [...]
The survey, taken between Feb. 28 and March 8, found
U.S. businesses had three nearly equal concerns about
longer-term risks: health care, the aging population
and the federal deficit. [...] |
NEWARK, N.J. - A man accused of
pointing a green laser beam at a small passenger jet,
temporarily blinding the pilot and co-pilot, was indicted
Wednesday under the federal anti-terror Patriot Act.
David W. Banach, who claimed he was looking at stars
with his daughter, also was accused of lying to the
FBI about the Dec. 29 incident in which the jet's windshield
and cabin were hit three times with a beam as the plane
approached Teterboro Airport.
The charges in the federal indictment were similar
to those filed against Banach in an FBI complaint in
January; the indictment replaces
the complaint.
Attorney Gina Mendola-Longarzo said Banach was using
the laser for stargazing when the plane was hit by the
beam.
"I think it's an absolute abuse
of prosecutorial discretion to charge my client under
the Patriot Act for non-purposeful conduct," she
said.
U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie said in a statement
officials took the actions "very seriously, and
we will not condone lying to federal agents."
Banach, 38, faces up to 20 years
in prison if convicted of interference with pilots of
an aircraft "with reckless disregard for the safety
of human life," a provision of the USA Patriot
Act passed following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
[...] |
MACON,GA.- Although advances in
science and technology improve prospects for developing
innovative medical treatments, scientific advancements
also lay the groundwork for the development, and use,
of dangerous weapons of mass destruction.
Somewhere between 10 and 17 countries now possess
biological weapons (BW) programs. Furthermore,
a bizarre string of suspicious deaths of prominent,
world-class microbiologists, who engaged in DNA sequencing-research,
has triggered suspicion of cover-up of the development
of ethnic-specific BW programs.
The theory is that weapons can
be biologically manipulated through DNA sequencing to
target certain ethnic groups with slight genetic features
not prevalent in other groups at the same percentages.
Harvard University microbiologist, Don C. Wiley, disappeared
in 2001. His body was found in the Mississippi River,
300 miles from where his abandoned rental car was parked.
He had been exploring DNA sequencing, which is key to
the development of ethnic-specific BW.
Three days before Wiley's disappearance, University
of Miami Medical School Microbiologist Benito Que, was
beaten to death in a parking lot. He was also a DNA-sequencing
specialist.
Russian defector and renowned Microbiologist Vladimir
Pasechnik, 64, was found dead at his home in the UK,
one week after meeting with Wiley in Boston to talk
over DNA sequencing.
North Korean Microbiologist, Dr. Ri Chae Woo, was
working on a whites-only ethnic-specific BW when he
defected from his underground laboratory at Chubari
Chemical Corporation in Anbyon, North Korea. It is theorized
that either the Chinese government or some Western intelligence
agency intercepted him.
Some have suggested that DNA-sequencing research must
be carefully monitored so that it won't be used to produce
genetic weapons aimed at racial or ethnic groups, as
well as at plants or animals. Perhaps the scientists
who died under suspicious circumstances agreed.
In its report, Emerging Technologies: Genetic Engineering
and Biological Weapons, The Sunshine Project urges governments
to ensure maximum transparency in their bio-defense
programs, and to immediately abandon any project that
violates the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions
Act. These steps would help to prevent the hostile exploitation
of biology, the report says.
The most incriminating evidence of the existence of
BW programs, particularly in Israel
and the United States proves to be the relationships
and odd connections between scientific academia and
intelligence agencies.
At the same time that some nations are moving forward
with BW research and development, some nations' attempts
to participate with BW research are being thwarted by
the elimination of scientific community.
For instance, more than 300 Iraqi scientists, particularly
those with knowledge of nuclear, chemical or biological
weapons, have been assassinated, since the U.S invaded
the country. One source reported that more than a 1000
leading Iraqi professionals and intellectuals were assassinated
within a 12-month period.
In a Washington Post article last year, Congressman
Steve Buyer blamed Iraqi insurgents for the assassinations,
but top Iraqi scientists and engineers last year told
the Christian Science Monitor they believe Israel and
the U.S. were responsible for the assassinations.
Usama al-Ani, director of the research and development
department in the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific
Research in Iraq, said in an Aljazeera article, that
he believes top Iraqi scientists are being targeted
by foreign powers, most probably Israel. Al-Ani
said Iraqi universities have lost 1315 scientists, or
eight percent of the 15,500 Iraqi academics, holding
MA and Ph.D. degrees.
If correct, some scientists are targeted for opposing
the creation of biological weapons while others are
targeted to exclude their participation in any weapons
program. If globally, we commit to developing defensive
biological products such as medicines and vaccines instead
of weapons of mass destruction, the deaths of scientists
would be unnecessary and with all the brilliant minds,
our world would have less illness.
Kenneth Wayne Yarbrough is a legislative writer
in the City of Boston, a certified emergency medical
technician for the State of Massachusetts and a certified
COBRA with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. |
TEXAS CITY, TEXAS - An explosion
at a Texas oil refinery has killed at least 14 people
and injured more than 100.
It isn't known what caused the blast, which ripped through
the British Petroleum refinery in the middle of the
afternoon.
The explosion was felt more
than eight kilometres away and caused significant
damage to nearby offices, and cars and trucks in the
parking lot.
BP's Texas City plant stretches across 480 hectares
and is made up of 30 refinery units. The plant processes
about 435,000 barrels of crude oil per day and employs
about 2,000 people.
The company claims its plant produces three per cent
of all the gasoline consumed in the United States.
News of the accident pushed gasoline futures higher
in after-hours trading. |
Three small explosive devices went
off today near a McDonald's, a Blockbuster video store
and an Italian bank in Milan, police said. They caused
minor damage, but no injuries.
The explosions cracked the windows at McDonald's and
Blockbuster and slightly damaged an ATM of Banca Intesa,
Italy's largest bank by assets, according to police
in the northern Italian city.
There has been no claim of responsibility and it was
not immediately clear if the explosions were linked,
police said. |
PHNOM PENH : A 28-year-old man
from Cambodia has died of bird flu at a hospital in
the capital, the second victim of the deadly virus in
the kingdom, the health minister said Thursday.
The victim, Meas Ran, came from Kampot province which
borders Vietnam and was from Pram Sasor village, 20
kilometres away from the home of the first victim, who
died in January after travelling for treatment to Vietnam.
"The tests show that the man had H5(N1 virus).
It is in the bird flu group. We sent a sample on Wednesday
to France for further confirmation," health minister
Nuth Sokhom told AFP as he travelled to Kampot province.
The victim died on Tuesday, he said.
|
ANKARA, Turkey - A
strong earthquake shook southeastern Turkey on Wednesday,
causing panic in a remote town already damaged by a
recent quake. No injuries or damage were immediately
reported.
The magnitude 5.5 quake struck shortly before midnight
and was centered near the town of Karliova in rural
Bingol province, the Istanbul-based Kandilli observatory
said. |
Taipei (Taiwan) - A moderate earthquake
shook northeastern Taiwan on Wednesday, the Central
Weather Bureau said. No damage or injuries were immediately
reported.
The 4.8-magnitude quake was centred 12 kilometers
(7.5 miles) southwest of Nanao, the weather bureau said.
Nanao is 90 kilometres (55 miles) southeast of the
capital, Taipei. |
QUETTA, Pakistan (AP) - Flash floods
triggered by heavy rains hit remote areas of southwestern
Pakistan on Wednesday, killing 21 people and forcing
thousands to flee their flooded homes, officials said.
The deaths were reported from villages near Kolhu,
a town about 300 kilometres east of Quetta after floodwaters
destroyed many homes there, said Razaq Bugti, a spokesman
for the Baluchistan government. [...] |
MAR. 23 12:56 P.M. ET A three-month
drought in Brazil's southern breadbasket has destroyed
an estimated 13 million tons of grain, believed to be
the worst crop loss in the country's history, officials
said Wednesday.
According to Jonas Cavalcante, spokesman for the government's
National Supply Company, this year's harvest will be
9 percent below initial predictions made in December,
costing farmers an estimated 6 billion reals ($2.2 billion)
in lost revenue.
"If these numbers are confirmed, it
will be the biggest crop loss in the history of Brazilian
agriculture. The climate has been very violent this
year and nobody was able to predict that,"
said Cavalcante. [...]
|
March 23, 2005 —
The Shroud of Turn has mystified scientists for years.
Now a literature professor from Idaho says he can prove
it's a fake.
For centuries, faithful have flocked to the Shroud
of Turin, which is – believed to be the burial
cloth of Jesus with the imprint of his body. The image
is a photographic negative. When reversed, IT PRODUCES
a clear picture of a bearded man.
But when the church let scientists do carbon dating
on it, they reported the cloth was only about 650 years
old, not 2,000.
Still, no one could explain how medieval artists could
make such an image. Now a professor from the Midwest
says he's figured out one way it could have been done.
Nathan Wilson/New St. Andrews College: "I assumed
that if a medieval forger could do it, all the tools
he'd have available to him to solve it would also be
available to me. I should be able to do the same."
[...]
Nathan Wilson/New St. Andrews College: "I painted
a picture of Christ or a Christ-like face on the glass,
and placed it over a dark linen... and left it in the
sun for ten days."
The sun bleached the dark cloth except for where the
paint blocked the sunlight. The result: a negative image,
that – when reversed – showed what appeared
to be a bearded man.
Nathan Wilson/New St. Andrews College: "The beautiful
thing about this theory is that a medieval would not
need to understand photo-negative imaging at all."
Experts have yet to examine Wilson's solution. But
the old question, how medieval forgers could have faked
this image now has a plausible answer. |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|