|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Pic
du Midi
Copyright 2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
ROME - Joy turned to
horror in Italy on Friday when an Italian journalist who
had been held hostage in Iraq was released, only to be
shot by U.S. military forces at a checkpoint in Baghdad.
Journalist Giuliana Sgrena underwent shoulder surgery
in Baghdad Friday.
Italian journalist Giuliana Sgrena suffered a shrapnel
wound to her shoulder when an American armoured car
fired on her vehicle, while an Italian intelligence
officer who had negotiated her release was killed.
Sgrena's editor said the dead agent, Nicola Calipari,
had thrown his body over Sgrena's in order to protect
her.
Two other intelligence agents in the car were also
injured.
Berlusconi demands explanation
Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, has
asked the American ambassador to explain the incident.
"It's a shame that the joy we all felt was turned
into tragedy," he said Friday evening.
In Washington, the Pentagon confirmed that a shooting
occurred as the Italian woman was being brought to an
American base near Baghdad's airport.
"At approximately 8:55 p.m. tonight, coalition
forces assigned to the multinational force in Iraq fired
on a vehicle that was approaching a coalition checkpoint
in Baghdad at a high rate of speed," the military
said in a statement.
The Italians' car made no move to slow down despite
signals and warning shots, so
U.S. forces fired into its engine block, the
statement said.
White House press spokesman Scott McClellan said coalition
forces will co-operate with Italian authorities during
an investigation into the incident.
"We regret the loss of life," he said from
Washington. "Our thoughts and prayers are with
the family of the Italian citizen."
Sgrena, a 56-year-old reporter for the communist daily
newspaper Il Manifesto, had been held captive in Iraq
since Feb. 4.
Thousands of demonstrators marched
through downtown Rome last month demanding that Italy
pull its troops out of Iraq, after a video was released
of a tearful Sgrena warning that she would be killed
if the country didn't withdraw.
Shortly after the video was released,
the Italian senate voted to extend the country's 3,000-troop
mission in Iraq to June.
The ANSA news agency said Foreign Minister Gianfranco
Fini expressed "great joy and enormous satisfaction"
early Friday about the reporter's release.
She was at least the eighth Italian citizen seized
in Iraq in recent months. Last September, two female
Italian journalists were released unharmed by their
unknown abductors after about three weeks.
At the time, the government denied allegations that
it paid a $1-million US ransom for their release.
Several other Italian hostages have been killed by
their captors. |
Agence France Press
is reporting that Giuliana Sgrena has told RAI News
24 that a "hail of gunfire" descended upon
the car transporting her in Baghdad "at the moment
she was talking with Nicola Calipari", the Italian
agent who died protecting her. "We were not going
very fast, given the circumstances...() The firing continued.
The driver couldn't even explain that we were Italian,"
said Sgrena in a phone call from the military hospital
where whe was transfered after arriving in Rome.
"Giuliana had information and the American military
did not want her to leave alive," affirmed her
companion, Pier Scolari, who evoked an American "ambush".
At the time she was kidnapped on February 4, the journalist
was preparing a report on the fugitives from Fallujah
who had sought refuge in a Baghdad mosque after the
American bombardment of the Sunnite stronghold.
"Nicola Calipari died on the spot, he was hit
in the head," declared Pier Scolari as he left
the hospital Celio, where he also said that Giuliana
had learned last Sunday of her imminent liberation.
Mr. Scolari left Friday on board a Falcon 900 put at
his disposal by the president of the Conseil to get
his companion in Baghdad. The drama occured in the early
evening when American soldiers fired upon the vehicule
carrying the journalist and those accompanying her to
the airport in Baghdad. The body of the head of the
mission was to be repatriated to Italy later in the
day on Saturday while one of the two wounded agents
arrived on the same plane as the jounralist. He was
transported to the Celio Hospital to be examined.
"The Americans and the Italians had been advised
of the passage of the car. They were 700 metres from
the airport which means they had passed all the control
points," said Pier Scolari. "The entire gunfight
was followed live by the president of the Conseil who
was on the phone with one of the members of the special
services. Then the Americans confiscated and shut off
the cell phones," added Mr. Scolari, who at that
moment was at the Palazzo Chigi, the office of the president
of the Conseil. |
Ten thousand Iraqis
in US and British prisons
GIULIANA SGRENA
il manifesto 29 December 2004
Two thousand victims in Fallujah
Giuliana Sgrena, Iraq
il manifesto 26 November 2004
Napalm Raid on Falluja?
GIULIANA SGRENA
il manifesto 23 November 2004
The death throes of Fallujah
Giuliana Sgrena
ilmanifesto 13 November 2004
"Stop the massacre"
GIULIANA SGRENA
il manifesto 12 November 2004
Bombs and tanks, hell breaks in Falluja
GIULIANA SGRENA
il manifesto 09 November 2004
Interview with an Iraki woman tortured at Abu Graib.
Giuliana Sgrena, our correspondent in Baghdad
il manifesto 01 July 2004
"Imminent attack" against Falluja
GIULIANA SGRENA
il manifesto 06 November 2004
Flight from a Falluja massacred by bombs
GIULIANA SGRENA
il manifestp 21 October 2004
UN: US crimes in Iraq
GIULIANA SGRENA
il manifesto 05 June 2004
|
(CNN) -- CNN has obtained
new pictures believed to show America's most-wanted
terrorist in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, whose network
carries out frequent attacks against Iraqi and U.S.
civilians and multinational troops. [...]
Islamic Web sites have posted at least two videos said
to show his followers publicly executing men they believe
are associated with the U.S.-led occupation.
Intelligence officials said this week that al Qaeda
leader Osama bin Laden has enlisted the help of al-Zarqawi
to plan new attacks inside the United States.
Al-Zarqawi's group is believed to be responsible for
car bombings and beheadings throughout Iraq. Last year,
he declared his allegiance to al Qaeda and changed the
name of his group from Unification and Jihad to al Qaeda
in Iraq.
An audiotape message attributed to al-Zarqawi called
the January 30 election for Iraq's National Assembly
and provincial councils a "big American lie."
The audiotape was posted on an Islamic Web site in
January. In it, the man called Iraq's interim government
a tool used by "Americans to promote this lie that
is called democracy ... You have to be careful of the
enemy's plots that involve applying democracy in your
country and confront these plots."
His group is believed to have carried out attacks during
the election.
In the statement, he declared that democracy's principles
of majority rule and pluralism "allow infidelity
and wrong practices to spread."
Photos show relaxed situation
It is unclear how recently the photos
were taken, but they appear to be taken at the same
time and place.
In the pictures, the man believed to be al-Zarqawi
is bearded and well-trimmed, and he appears relaxed.
It looks as if he is sitting on the floor against a
wall. He is wearing a dark shirt or turtleneck.
In the pictures he is seen smiling, looking straight
ahead or chatting with unknown people. |
UNITED NATIONS, March
4 (Xinhuanet) -- About 90 sites in Iraq containing dual-use
equipment and materials that can be used for either peaceful
ends or acquiring weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) have
been looted or razed, a UN panel said on Friday.
In its latest quarterly report to the Security Council,
the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission
(UNMOVIC) reached the conclusion based on continuing
examination of high-resolution satellite imagery from
sites that were subject to monitoring.
UNMOVIC has been in charge of searching for Iraq's
nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and verifying
their destruction. It withdrew from Iraq ahead of the
US-led invasion into the country two years ago and has
since been barred from returning by Washington.
"As part of the examination and analysis, experts
have determined that approximately 70 of the sites were
subjected to varying degrees of bomb damage," the
report said.
"The continuing examination of site imagery has
revealed that approximately 90 of the total 353 sites
analyzed containing equipment and materials of relevance
have been stripped and/or razed," it added.
The commission said it had inquired Iraq's neighbors
-- Jordan,Turkey, Kuwait and Syria -- whether looted
items from Iraq's sitesfound their way into or through
their territory. Syria has given a negative response,
while Iran and Saudi Arabia have yet to reply.
The report also stated that the question of the continued
existence of "seed stock," the reference to
strains of micro-organisms that can be used in the future
production of biological weapons agents, remains "part
of the residue of uncertainty."
"Given its unresolvable nature, the issue could
best be dealt with through monitoring to detect inter
alia any possible future activity associated with biological
weapon agent production or significant laboratory research
work," it said.
The Security Council is scheduled to discuss the report
next Tuesday. |
Dr Khalid ash-Shaykhli , a representative
of the Iraqi Ministry of Health who was authorized
to assess health conditions in al-Fallujah after the
end of the major battles there, announced that the
surveys and studies which a medical team did in al-Fallujah
and subsequently reported to the Ministry confirm
that US forces used substances that are internationally
prohibited -- including mustard gas, nerve gas, and
other burning chemicals -- in the course of its attacks
on the city.
Ash-Shaykhli held a press conference in the Health
Ministry building in Baghdad's Bab al-Mu'azzam section
on Tuesday. He began by reporting on the final results
of the fact-finding mission's survey of the situation
in which the people of al-Fallujah find themselves.
He said that the city now is
still experiencing the effects of chemical and other
types of weapons used by the Americans, which will
be causing serious diseases over the long term.
The correspondent for Mafkarat al-Islam asked ash-Shaykhli
what were the facts regarding use by the occupation
forces of limited nuclear weapons. Dr. ash-Shaykhli
said,
"What I saw during our researches in al-Fallujah
make me believe everything that has been said about
that battle. I absolutely
do not exclude their use of nuclear and chemical
substances, since all forms of nature were wiped
out in that city. I can even say that we
found dozens, not to say hundreds, of stray dogs,
cats, and birds that had perished as a result of
those gasses."
During the press conference, which was attended
by more than 20 Iraqi and Arab journalists, Ash-Shaykhli
promised that he would be sending the study and the
results that the committee produced to responsible
bodies -- both Iraqi and international ones.
The press conference was attended by correspondents
of the Iraqi ash-Sharqiyah television network, the
Iraqi government-run al-'Iraqiyah satellite TV network,
and the as-Sumariyah network, in addition to foreign
media, such as the American Washington Post and the
Knight-Ridder service and the Iraqi as-Sabah newspaper
-- besides the correspondent of Mafkarat al-Islam
.
The findings disclosed at Tuesday's [Tuesday, March
1, 2005] press conference must be seen as the most
serious statements to be made since the end of nearly
four months of military operations in al-Fallujah,
Mafkarat al-Islam noted. Mafkarat al-Islam was the
first to report on the American occupation forces'
use of gasses and burning and chemical substances
during the first days after the outbreak of fighting
in the city. |
Some Thoughts on the Middle
East and America: 33 Things You Should Think About
What right has President Bush or Conde Rice to dictate
to the Lebanese Government?
Why is it that the "demonstrators"
in Beirut, Lebanon, had all their signs in English?
Have you considered that they were playing to the
American TV audience? In fact, the "big crowds"
the American media spoke about were less than 3000
people, but the cameras shot the crowed for maximum
effect.
Did you realize that according to the VA, 1 in 6
troops coming back from Iraq need mental help from
what they've seen and felt in Iraq?
Did these few thousand Falangists speak for all
of Lebanon, or are they "for hire" street
people mixed with some students who made up the "demonstrations?"
Who forced Karami to resign as PM? How much influence
did America have in this situation and what business
was it of Bush's?
Did you realize the Falangists took their name from
Franco's Falangist/Fascists? The Gemeyal family, head
of the falangists, had close ties to the dictator,
Franco.
Did you realize that the suicide rate among our
American troops in Iraq is now up 29% in the last
two months? Health professionals in the continental
US are alarmed, but the Pentagon refuses to take responsibility
for these deaths.
Why is America so anxious to get Syria out of Lebanon?
Is it so that both Lebanon and Syria will be vulnerable
to one front attacks by Israel?
Have any of you considered that
the oil pipeline the Israelis want opened between
Baghdad and Israel runs through Syria and Lebanon?
It does.
Why is America constantly
doing the bidding of Israel - are we Israel?
Why did America not stop aid to Israel when they found
out that Israel was selling high tech American secrets
to China? Why has America not stopped this by now?
What has Israel done for America lately, other than
selling its military secrets to the highest non-American
bidder?
Are you aware that more of our
military in Iraq have come home with stress disorders
than any time in American history - even outdistancing
the Vietnam war? This according to therapists at Camp
Pendleton.
Have any of you considered that Israel wants the
oil, but also wants the water, electricity and hashish
that is grown in the southern part of Lebanon?
Suppose Syria told us to get our troops out of Iraq,
their neighbor - would we listen?
Who gave America permission to invade Iraq? Certainly
not the UN, though Bush keeps claiming the UN gave
him authority. If this continues, then we will have
a dog eat dog world, with the UN losing all authority
and only the strong will survive - and that means
that in the near future China will overrun America
or its power in the world or both.
Why should more Americans and Iraqis get killed,
or get traumatized for life by Bush's illegal and
immoral war in Iraq?
Why is it that Bush, an AWOL chicken-hawk can sends
so many of our troops to their death in Iraq, with
no progress in sight. Even
General Abizaid admitted last night, on the Newshour
on PBS that the resistance in Iraq will go on for
years, with no predictable end in sight? Would
you like to go serve in Iraq? Would you like one of
your loved ones to go serve in Iraq or Afghanistan?
Has Bush or the American troops brought more peace
or more suffering to Iraq?
Is America bringing more stability to Lebanon, or
is he, in league with the Falangists making more civil
unrest, and possibly civil war, in Lebanon? You can
see it coming, can't you - just admit it. Most likely,
if this continues, it will lead to civil war because
the Muslims in Lebanon will not tolerate the Falangists
taking over the government by "demonstrations."
Why doesn't Bush send his daughters as volunteers
to Iraq, Rumsfeld his kids, Cheney his children, Wolfowitz
his, and let's see how long this "democratizing
" of Iraq will continue.
Are you aware most Lebanese hate the Falangists
because they allied themselves with Israel, and gave
intelligence to Israel, in its 1980s invasion of Lebanon,
wherein most of Beirut was destroyed, thousands killed
and the country made into a basket case. The Falangists
also are the ones who committed the atrocities at
the Sabra and Shatilla Refugee Camps wherein women,
children and old men were slaughtered as the Israeli
army stood guard to stop anyone from interfering with
the massacres. Check it out in your history books
if you don't believe it, or check UN records - it's
all there.
Do you realize that for the OPEC nations that denominate
their oil sales and receipts in dollars, that what
was a $32.00 dollar barrel of oil before the dollar
slid so much in the past 2 years is now equivalent
to the $48-50 barrel of oil today. That is, to get
the same $32 in value, OPEC nations must charge $48-50
dollars per barrel. That may help you understand why
oil has gone up so high. Those that pay in Euros are
laughing all the way to the bank and we are going
broke, and shall go further into debt as more of the
oil pipelines are blown up because of our Middle Eastern
wars and interference in their domestic matters.
Did you realize there are very
few functioning hospitals, electric stations, water
purification plants functioning in Iraq at this time
than there were in 1917? Is this "progress"?
What kind of "aid" is America giving to
Iraq when they have destroyed 90% of Iraq's infrastructure
and not rebuilt it? Where is that $9 billion dollars
that disappeared under Paul Bremer? Shouldn't we hold
him financially accountable or imprison him for graft
and fraud?
Did you realize the American government and the
right wing neo-cons have shipped millions of dollars
into Iraq to buy influence so that their favorite
dictator, Allawi, has a chance to become Prime Minister?
If he becomes PM, then he'll ask America to stay on,
will honor the illegal contracts signed by Paul Bremer
to give all of Iraq's resources to American companies
and basically lengthen the civil strife and resistance
to America in Iraq.
Why is Conde Rice out dictating to the Palestinians
to get their "terrorists" under control,
when Israel has killed more than 160 Palestinians,
wounded hundreds more, and destroyed countless houses
and business buildings since the "truce"
of November 2004?
By the way, Palestinian suicide people have killed
less than 1 dozen Israelis during that time until
last week's attack.
Have you ever looked at the official UN records
that show Israel has killed and attacked Palestinians,
their homes, their infrastructure at a rate of 75
to 1?
Where are these billions of dollars, nay, trillions,
coming from to fight these "foreign wars"
that Bush loves so much? We are paying the bills through
our increasing taxes.
Incidentally, the "defense contractors"
like Halliburton, Brown & Root, are getting rich
off our backs. Do you love it?
Have you seen that Sharon, while allegedly "pulling
of Gaza and the West Bank," has approved over
6000 new Israeli homes in the West Bank and the Palestinian
area of Jerusalem? Check it out in Reuters, BBC, China
News, India Daily - you won't find it on any American
media sites or in the rags they call "newspapers"
in our country.
Did you know the IMF has put America on a "financial
watch list" because of the weakness of the dollar?
That means our economy is almost bankrupt - really.
Do you realize that the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) has reported that Israel has over 250
atomic and hydrogen bombs in its arsenal, plus all
the latest American stealth and military technology?
Why is it then that America is so keen on attacking
Iran and Syria to protect "tiny little"
Israel?
What would you do if you had a city in America called
"the city of churches" and it was bombed
by Iraqis and most of them destroyed? That's what
our troops did in Fallujah, destroyed most of the
mosques in the "city of mosques." Do you
think the Muslim Iraqis will love us for this?
How can America ask for a "nuclear free Middle
East" and still allow Israel to keep its atomic
and hydrogen bombs? Does this make sense to you? Are
we so dumb?
Have you noticed that all
the "news" from Iraq is from our military,
from media embedded with our troops, or from Allawi
and his gang or the Kurds, but never from the Shi'a,
leading Sunnis or the anti-American civilians?
Don't you think this is a bit slanted? As a former
professor of mass media, I know it is slanted. Thus,
we are being fed only propaganda by our media, ala
George Orwell's , 1984, no real, honest "news,"
just propaganda.
These are just a few things you should consider
when hearing about our "democratizing the Middle
East" |
BEIRUT (AP) - Syrian
President Bashar Assad was expected to announce a troop
pullback to eastern Lebanon near the Syrian border - but
not a full withdrawal - in a speech Saturday to parliament,
Syrian and Lebanese officials said Friday. The move would
fall short of U.S. and Arab demands for a full withdrawal.
Arab powerhouses Saudi Arabia and Egypt want Assad
to start quickly on removing all his 15,000 troops from
Lebanon, where Damascus has held sway for more than
a decade.
U.S. President George W. Bush said he wants all Syrian
forces out by May, when Lebanon holds parliamentary
elections - stepping up previous calls in which he set
no deadline.
"I don't mean just the troops
out of Lebanon, I mean all of them out of Lebanon, particularly
the secret service out of Lebanon - the intelligence
services," he told the New York Post in an interview
published Friday.
"This is non-negotiable. It is
time to get out," he said. "I don't think
you can have fair elections with Syrian troops there."
Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Walid Mouallem said
his country will fulfil its promise to redeploy its
troops in Lebanon and he confirmed that Assad was likely
to announce a pullback on Saturday.
Mouallem spoke during a visit to Syria's longtime ally
Russia, where he met with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov,
who also pressed for the troops to leave Lebanon in
line with a UN Security Council resolution.
Lebanese Defence Minister Abdul-Rahim Murad suggested
Syria wants to keep some troops in the country on a
long-term basis, saying a complete removal of the troops
would have to be negotiated between Syria and Lebanon's
governments - as called for in an 1989 agreement. [...]
Syria has said in behind-the-scenes diplomacy with
Arab countries this week that it wants to keep 3,000
troops and early-warning stations in Lebanon, according
to an Arab diplomat in Cairo. The Syrian army already
operates radar stations in Dahr el-Baidar, on mountain
tops bordering Syria. Israeli warplanes have attacked
the sites in the past. [...]
Last month, Syrian Information Minister Mahdi Dakhlallah
said if there was a new redeployment, some troops would
return to Syria.
But that may not be enough for Arab governments, which
have grown increasingly impatient with Syrian reluctance
to order a withdrawal outright. Egypt and Saudi Arabia
have spoken to Syria about completing a pullout as soon
as April, according to Arab diplomats.
Arab leaders are worried that Syrian refusal to leave
completely will prompt tougher action by the international
community to force it to do so. Syria has fallen into
deeper isolation, even with traditional allies France
and Russia joining the United States and United Nations
[...]
Pressure on Syria to withdraw its troops has increased
since the Feb. 14 assassination of former prime minister
Rafik Hariri, a killing that plunged Lebanon into political
turmoil and brought Syria widespread condemnation. |
Syrian President Bashar
al-Asad is poised to announce a major troop redeployment
in neighbouring Lebanon, officials have said.
But it was unclear how far the pullback would go to
meet UN demands for a complete withdrawal.
A Lebanese minister on Friday said Syria was seeking
"guarantees" from the international community
before agreeing to a full pullout, but Russian Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov said he was satisfied the new
proposals from Damascus "correspond" with
UN Security Council Resolution 1559.
US President George Bush on Friday also reiterated
Washington's position that nothing less than a complete
withdrawal would suffice.
The Lebanese minister, who asked not be identified,
said he expected al-Asad to unveil the new pullback
in a keynote address to parliament on Saturday.
Guarantees sought
"We expect an announcement for a pullback into
the Baka [valley in eastern Lebanon] before the Arab
summit" scheduled for 23 March in Algeria, the
minister said.
"The announcement for a complete withdrawal will
depend on political consultations," he added.
"Syria wants guarantees, a sort of a roadmap,
and wants consultations at the regional and international
levels for the resumption of the peace process."
Syria has long argued that it needs to retain troops
in Lebanon because of Israel's continued occupation
of the Golan Heights, seized from Damascus in the 1967
Middle East war.
Negotiations
Negotiations for their return broke down in 2000, and
despite Damascus abandoning all pre-conditions for renewed
talks late last year, Israel has
shown no interest in a fresh round of negotiations.
But Lavrov made no mention of any guarantees after
being given a preview of Syria's plans by Deputy Foreign
Minister Walid al-Muallim in Moscow.
"We are satisfied that the Syrian side plans
to take steps that we understand will be announced soon
... which correspond with Resolution 1559" passed
by the Security Council last September, Lavrov said.
His Syrian guest expressed hope that the plan would
prove acceptable to the Security Council, including
France and the United States, who co-sponsored the resolution
and have spearheaded demands for its implementation.
"I brought with me a certain Syrian plan, I think
that you will soon hear about this plan, about an agreement
between Syria and Lebanon," Muallim said.
"I am optimistic that this plan will be approved
by all members of the UN Security Council." |
BEIJING, Mar. 5 -- United
States President George W. Bush on Friday flatly rejected
any partial withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon.
He says that he will not accept the kind of "half-measures"
Damascus is expected to propose as a compromise.
"We want that democracy in Lebanon to succeed
and we know it cannot succeed so long as she is occupied
by a foreign power. There is no half measures involved,
when the United States and France and others say withdrawal
we mean complete withdrawal, no half hearted measures."
|
Four Palestinian boys demonstrating
against the separation barrier being built by Israel in
occupied West Bank have been beaten and detained
by undercover Israeli police, witnesses said.
On Friday Ahmad Shaikh, 14,
Muntasir al-Jamal, 12,
Mustafa Khalid, 13,
and 14-year-old Amjad
Shaikh were protesting against the destruction and
confiscation of land in the village of Bait Surik,
northwest of Jerusalem, along with some 200 others,
when Israeli military police
disguised as Palestinians
beat and detained them.
A spokesperson for the Israeli civil administration
was unable to comment on the allegation.
Residents of the village have been agitating against
the destruction of farm land to make way for Israel's
separation barrier since 26 February.
The West Bank wall has been ruled illegal by the
Hague-based International Court of Justice.
Witness account
Witnesses told Aljazeera.net
the arrests were completely unprovoked.
"On my way home [after the demonstration],
I saw two individuals amid us who were not familiar
to me. I asked if I could talk to them, but
they backed away and I began to warn people about
them. I suspected they were undercover police,"
Muhammad Mansur, 36, a village resident, said.
"They began throwing stones
at the protesters to incite them. They then took out
their guns and began beating a youth with it, and
shooting into the air."
The army detained five boys, releasing one shortly
thereafter, and injured six of the protesters. The boys
are reported to have received severe beatings.
Leila M, an Israeli activist, said she has contacted
the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel about
the case.
The detained boys are being held in Kfar
Etzion juvenile jail and have a trial scheduled for
Sunday at the Ofer military court, according to security
sources.
This is the fourth consecutive
day that Israeli Special Forces - disguised as Palestinians
- have infiltrated the demonstrations in Bait
Surik, according to the International Solidarity Movement,
which brings foreign activists to the Occupied Territories.
On Thursday two Palestinians were arrested and later
released under similar circumstances.
Tape not aired
Leila M was at the scene of a demonstration on Wednesday
and filmed it. She said: "Israeli undercover
police arrested six teenagers and released them the
next day, and the film footage
shows the border police throwing stones at the demonstrators
and, while arresting them, continuing to beat them."
The Israeli activist added
that she gave the tape to several Israeli channels,
but none of them aired it.
On 28 February, Israeli undercover agents arrested
six Palestinians including the mayor of Bait Surik,
Muhammad Qandil, who had attempted to speak with Israeli
soldiers about the destruction of their lands.
Israeli police say Qandil assaulted a border policeman,
a charge he vehemently denies through his lawyer,
Bilal Mahfuz.
"He was told he was being taken to meet with
contractors working on the separation wall.
Instead he was arrested on charges of assaulting a
soldier and violating a military order to build the
wall," Mahfuz said.
The judge agreed to release Qandil to house arrest
on 12,000 new Israeli shekels ($2800) cash bail
- which the villagers pitched in to provide - until
his hearing, but the prosecution
appealed the decision based on "secret evidence"
and Qandil is still sitting in prison, according
to his lawyer. [...] |
The attachment of
American Jews to Israel has weakened measurably in the
last two years, a recent survey demonstrates, continuing
a long-term trend visible during the past decade and
a half. The weakening is apparent in almost every measure
of Jewish connection to Israel except for interest in
travel to Israel, which showed a slight uptick, and
a handful of others that were unchanged. . . Strikingly,
there was no parallel decline in other measures of Jewish
identification, including religious observance and communal
affiliation.
The survey found 26% who said they were "very"
emotionally attached to Israel, compared with 31% who
said so in a similar survey conducted in 2002. Some
two-thirds, 65%, said they follow the news about Israel
closely, down from 74% in 2002, while 39% said they
talk about Israel frequently with Jewish friends, down
from 53% in 2002. Those who talk about Israel frequently
with non-Jewish friends dropped to 23% this year from
33% in 2002.
Those who had donated to an Israel-related charity
during the previous 12 months dropped to 40% in the
current survey from 49% in 2002. Attendance at an Israel-related
program dropped to 22% from 27%.
Israel also declined as a component in the respondents'
personal Jewish identity. When offered a selection of
factors, including religion, community and social justice,
as well as "caring about Israel," and asked,
"For you personally, how much does being Jewish
involve each?" 48% said Israel mattered "a
lot," compared with 58% in 2002.
Just 57% affirmed that "caring about Israel is
a very important part of my being Jewish," compared
with 73% in a similar survey in 1989...
Tellingly, as many as 37% agreed that they were "often
disturbed by Israel's policies and actions," while
another 30% were not sure...
Seventy percent said they attend a Passover Seder,
42% claimed synagogue membership, and 20% said they
keep separate dishes at home for meat and dairy. Questioned
on denomination, 9% identified themselves as Orthodox,
36% as Conservative and 40% as Reform...
About two-thirds of American Jews view "many"
or "most" Israelis in positive terms as "peace-loving,"
"democratic" and "heroic." But more
than 40% see many Israelis as "chauvinist"
and "militarist."
When offered sharply critical characterizations of
Israel's treatment of the Palestinians, more respondents
disagreed than agreed. However, substantial numbers
were unsure. Thus, by 60% to 11% the sample rejected
the assertion that "Israel persecutes a minority
population," with 29% not sure. Similarly, by a
65% to 13% margin, they rejected the notion that "Israel
occupies lands that belong to another people,"
with 22% not sure. A narrower margin, 43% to 20% (with
37% unsure), rejected the proposition, "When dealing
with Palestinian civilians, Israeli soldiers often engage
in unnecessary brutality
|
Political language is designed
to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable,
and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
-Orwell
Rape, massacre, theft, torture, ethnic cleansing:
these are not crimes which nations can defend with
ease - especially when unearthed by their own historians.
Israel recently faced this most troubling predicament.
Combing through declassified state archives, Israeli
scholars of the past twenty years have discovered
their nation was founded upon the mass expulsion and
deliberate destruction of the native Palestinian people.
(1) Israel, it turned out, was far more Goliath than
David. Since this presented somewhat of a public relations
problem for a state still engaged in brutalizing Palestinians
and stealing their land, a new self-justifying rationale
needed to be authored.
Enter the "new anti-Semitism."
This doctrine turns reality on its head, declaring
criticism of Israel's racist behavior to be itself
racist - "anti-Semitic."
Empathy for Palestinians being beaten, bullied, and
bulldozed out of existence, the doctrine goes, is
nothing but some disguised expression of Jew-hatred.
Goose-stepping Germans and uprooted Palestinians are
portrayed as part of the same unbroken line of anti-Semitism,
even though those inhabiting concentration camps today
- "the largest ever to exist," says Israeli
historian Baruch Kimmerling - are the Palestinians
themselves. (2) But no matter. Abusing
the memory of Holocaust victims to shut down criticism
of Israeli crimes - crimes unearthed mostly by Jewish
historians - may be obscene, but it is also effective.
Wielding this new ideological weapon, Israel's
champions aim to cut down pro-Palestinian voices inside
America with the same ruthlessness Israeli soldiers
employ to shoot up Palestinian children outside their
homes. (3) The latest targets in this well-organized
hit are Arab-American professors at Columbia University
who teach Middle Eastern studies. The targets have
been judiciously selected. Since these particular
professors are Arab in an age when bombing and torturing
Arabs has virtually become a national sport, they
make for easy prey; and since they have added to their
original sin of being Arab the even graver sin of
speaking the truth about Israel's past - no less in
a country which subsidizes Israel's existence - they
also make for necessary prey.
In full accordance with "new
anti-Semitism" modus operandi , the attacks paint
the professors themselves as the attackers.
With Orwellian brushstrokes, they are rendered as
demons bent on "intimidating" Jewish students
at the university. This much is to be expected. Less
expected, however, is the almost embarrassing shoddiness
of the trumped-up production. The
wild charges made against the professors are so poorly
substantiated and the political motives of the accusers
so painfully transparent, one almost forgets that
America's well-financed pro-Israel network has extensive
experience in smearing its opponents. (4)
Curiously, the charges of "silencing"
and "intimidation" first made waves when
it was learned that the accusing students made their
case on camera . They appeared in a short film, titled
"Columbia Unbecoming", produced by a Boston-based
group called the David Project. At this point it is
both necessary and prudent to ask: what is the "David
Project"?
At its website, the organization describes itself
as "a grassroots initiative that promotes a fair
and honest understanding of the Middle East conflict."
A noble enough endeavor, no doubt. But a few lines
later, we come to this: "We
train people to be pro-active in their Israel advocacy"
Another page offers - for a fee, of course - an intense
three-hour ideological session titled "Making
the Case for Israel." Searching for a
"Making the Case for Palestine" program
yields no results. Similarly, a look at the speaker's
roster reveals many pro-Israeli speakers, but not
a single pro-Palestinian. Perhaps most revealing is
the text prefacing their speaker section: "For
more information on how to bring our speakers to your
synagogue, school, church, or community center, please
call" (5) Apparently churches
and synagogues are welcome, but mosques need not apply.
One wonders why.
The site then goes on to describe what it considers
to be a "fair and honest position": "The
essence of the Middle East conflict is about Jewish
existence and self-determination in the face of a
hostile Arab world and radical Islamists." (6)
Israel's own recent historians take a rather different
view. Commenting on the founding of Israel, Senior
Lecturer of Military History in the IDF Aryeh Yitzhaki
says, "a generation has passed, and it is now
possible to face the ocean of lies in which we were
brought up. In almost every
conquered village in the War of Independence, acts
were committed, which are defined as war crimes, such
as indiscriminate killings, massacres and rapes."
(7) Describing Zionism - the founding ideology of
Israel - another Israeli historian, Tom Segev, writes:
"'Disappearing' the Arabs lay at the heart of
the Zionist dream, and was also a necessary condition
of its existence. With few exceptions, none of the
Zionists disputed the desirability of forced transfer
- or its morality." (8)
Committing war crimes and disappearing people from
their homes doesn't quite square well with pious rhetoric
about "self-determination." But the folks
at the David Project are free to cling to their pro-Israel
political line. That they do so while pretending to
be some kind of impartial educational group, however,
speaks volumes. So much for "fairness" -
and, even more so, "honesty."
Given the clear ideological orientation of the David
Project, one is forced to ask the obvious: why would
students claiming to be "intimidated" and
"silenced" by their professors bypass all
university channels, and rush headlong into the arms
of a political front group? Looking at the film itself
provides us some answers.
In this half-hour production featuring 14 students,
only six present firsthand complaints; standing accused
are professors Joseph Massad, George Saliba, and Hamid
Dabashi. Complaints range from
random flyering incidents having nothing to do with
professors, to general ideological disagreements with
what professors have written, to statements they allegedly
made in person. No evidence
is presented for any of the charges.
Columbia student Adam Sacarny wrote in the school's
newspaper upon seeing the film: "Much like the
electoral campaigns, it uses talking points in place
of pesky verifiable facts," adding, "The
film's case is so shoddy that I fail to see how any
critical viewer could leave the theater convinced
that [the department] has violated academic integrity
standards." (9) Even the
generally sympathetic Israeli daily Haaretz admits,
"The movie fuses few solid examples of intimidation
- only some of which involved professors and the students
they were teaching - with generalized complaints of
anti-Israel and anti-Semitic statements and behavior
on campus." (10) And
despite these students' claims of being "silenced,"
"intimidated," and "denied"(their
own words), not one of them say their grades were
affected. (11)
Quite "coincidentally," the main target
of the film is the untenured professor, Joseph Massad.
He is accused of making outlandish
comments and exhibiting an extreme intolerance toward
pro-Israeli views in class. Yet
only one of the students in the film has even taken
a course with the professor. Moreover, precisely
none of them even majored in the "offending"
department of Middle East and Asian Languages and
Cultures. (12) But rest assured. The complaining students
have other "qualifications."
One student shuttles back and forth from America
to Israel to explain how to adjust the prefatory sales
pitch for the film depending on the audience. (13)
Another served in the Israeli
military, which, according to events personally witnessed
by former New York Times Middle East Bureau chief
Chris Hedges, "entice[s]
children like mice into a trap and murder[s] them
for sport," and which also, according to a CIA
study, acquires "data for use in silencing anti-Israel
factions in the West" and engages in "sabotage,
paramilitary and psychological warfare projects, such
as character assassination and black propaganda."
(14) Another complaining
student who was a lead organizer for the film, Ariel
Beery, boasts an impressive resume: he served as a
spokesman for the Israeli military, is the head of
the on-campus Zionist group, and is also an agent
and informer for Daniel Pipes' notorious CampusWatch.org
website, where students are encouraged to "report"
their professors' political views if they are deemed
insufficiently servile to the conservative party line.
(15)
But this is not all. None
of the targeted professors were even allowed a chance
to rebut the charges on the film. The reason
for this, according to David Project head Ralph Avi
Goldwasser, in comments given to the Israeli daily
The Jerusalem Post , is that "the film wasn't
meant to be a documentary; it was merely an effort
to collect students' testimony about classroom incidents."
Unsurprisingly, the David Project is simply being
dishonest (again), since it turns out that they
deliberately ignored the voices of Jewish and non-Jewish
students who found such "incidents" to be
fabricated and had no problems with the targeted professors.
Eric Posner, who describes himself as "a Jew,
an Israeli, a Jerusalemite, and an American,"
reports that "I was approached last year by Ariel
Beery who wanted to hear my opinion about MEALAC and
Massad, whose class I was enrolled in at the time.
When I expressed my profound
appreciation for Massad's critical approach and the
multiplicity of perspectives that he offers in his
classroom, Beery told me that he wouldn't be calling
me back for a taped interview." (16)
Posner also took it upon himself to gather some
highly illuminating statements from other students
who took Professor Massad's classes. Below are four:
"Several individuals who audited this class
regularly attempted to disturb the progress of the
class. During these disturbances, the auditors often
attempted to dominate the class discussion with
personal statements unrelated or extremely loosely
related to the course material. They were regularly
unprepared for the classroom discussion, not having
completed the required reading, and for the most
part were largely ignorant of the class' subject
matter. It was fairly obvious
that these individuals had registered for the course
for the sole purpose of disrupting the progress
of the class. To my amazement, [Massad] allowed
each and every student in the class an opportunity
to speak, regardless of their familiarity with the
class subject matter and required course material."
-John Taplett
"I am Jewish. I am not a Zionist. Joseph
Massad is a man who understands the distinction
and does not attempt to conflate the two around
a vague connection with Israel. Knowing that he
is being accused of anti-Semitism is not only a
slap in HIS face, it is a slap in the face of every
Jew who understands a legacy of oppression and chooses
not to become an oppressor."
-Maura Finkelstein
"On the question of religion, he was openly
critical of all religions including Islam - his
anti-Israeli opinions could not reasonably have
been construed as anti-Semitic. Similarly, while
being critical of Israeli policy, he did not hesitate
to offer critical opinions of Yasser Arafat. In
general, he maintained a tone of critical scholarly
inquiry."
-Hitesh Manglani
"As for academic discrimination, I am a Jew
who wrote a term paper criticizing Palestinian nationalism
for its foundation in support for violence, and
despite Massad's supposed bias, he gave me an A."
- Benjamin Wheeler (17)
By now the general picture is quite clear. An
ideologically motivated clique of Zionist students,
possessing no actual evidence of "intimidation"
but infuriated upon hearing their fairy-tale version
of Israeli history dismantled, teamed up with a pro-Israel
political front group masquerading as educators to
smear a few Arab professors as "anti-Semites"
- conveniently excluding the opinion of those
"Semites" who fully support their teachers
and actually took classes with them.
More damning than the poverty and hollowness of
the film, however, is the fact that it was even produced.
After all, what kind of "victimized"
students are able to summon to their command the financial
and technical resources of something like the David
Project? Moreover, how do such "victims"
procure for themselves a $3 million dollar building
on campus, a privilege no other Columbia group enjoys?
(18) Claims to victimization - a central feature in
the reverse-reality trick known as "the new anti-Semitism"
- are also completely discredited by the fact that
viciously right-wing tabloids in New York, the Sun
and the Daily News , have joined in on the attack
against the professors, castigating them as "firebrands"
and demanding they be fired. Prominent New York City
politicians have also demanded that the professors
be "investigated" if not fired outright.
(19) Truly remarkable is the
"victim" so well-endowed in assets and allies.
I do not mean to suggest, however, that these Zionist
students have no understanding of intimidation or
persecution - far from it. Indeed, they
well know of a place where people are intimidated
in extreme ways, often "ordered to urinate and
execrate on one other," "beaten and ordered
to crawl around;" a place where children are
forced to clean their masters' latrines and are then
taken into rooms to be beaten senseless, until "they
cannot stand up"; where passengers are pulled
from cars and then "beaten with rifle butts and
helmets"; where pregnant women are prevented
from reaching hospitals; where the masters refer to
the slaves as a "cancer" requiring "chemotherapy"
or "amputation" - where in essence, people
are treated far worse than anything these students
claim to have undergone. (20)
The "where" is
occupied Palestine, the people being brutalized are
Palestinians, and those doing the brutalizing are
Zionists. Here is where millions of natives
suffer under military occupation imposed by Israeli
soldiers - at least 20% of whom "join the army
with the preconception that Arab lives are worth less
than Jewish lives, " according to Israeli Major
General Elazar Stern. (21) Here is where unarmed 13
year-old girls can be shot twice "from close
range at [the] head" and then "sprayed with
automatic gunfire" afterwards without penalty.
(22) Here is where real, actual, tangible "intimidation"
and "silencing" takes place. And here is
where our whining Zionists at Columbia could go and
learn an object lesson in what intimidation is all
about - if only they were not preoccupied with endorsing
it.
It is a resounding indictment of the intellectual
and moral poverty of our times that those who support
murder, torture, brutality, and racism - while lounging
around in plush multi-million dollar offices on an
Ivy League campus and starring in pseudo-documentaries,
no less - are considered the victims , those speaking
on behalf of the suffering are considered criminals
, and those actually suffering from the real atrocities
taking place are not considered at all.
For those concerned with justice, the course of
action could not be clearer. Now is a time not for
interminable hesitance, but immediate resistance.
The extraordinary level of arrogance, cruelty, and
hate embodied by the forces promoting this and numerous
other right-wing witch-hunts cannot be allowed to
prowl about unchecked. For this is merely an extension
of the war of bombs and bullets being waged upon the
Arabs abroad; it is an attempt to Guantanomize our
minds, Abu Ghraib our hearts, and Fallujah our souls
- to remove from us every last trace of what is the
best in each of us: the instinct to side with the
weak and aid the oppressed.
To resist this colonization of our compassion, to
re-cultivate our resistance against those who believe
in the "compassion" of colonization - these
are the pressing demands of the hour. How vigorously
we respond to these demands will determine whether
those bruised, beaten children of Palestine will ultimately
receive some respite from their inhumane condition,
or instead find themselves further abused by the silent
whip of indifference. In their eyes we will read either
the redemption or indictment of the moral standing
of our own country.
M. Junaid Alam , 22, is co-editor of the radical
youth journal Left Hook (http://www.lefthook.org ),
and a student at Northeastern University. He can be
reached at alam@lefthook.org.
|
India has signed
a deal to take a 49% stake in a Venezuelan oil field,
boosting energy ties between one of Asia's biggest consuming
economies and one of the world's largest exporters.
Under the agreement reached on Saturday in New Delhi,
Indian state-controlled energy giant Oil and Natural
Gas Corp (ONGC), which is scouring the globe to meet
the country's ever-expanding fuel needs, will take a
49% stake in the San Cristobal oil field.
"For us to receive 49% plus the operatorship is
... a huge advance and with that I am now truly well
positioned to commercialise exploration work,"
India's Petroleum Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar told reporters.
No financial details of the deal were available. The
signing of the agreement came on the second day of a
four-day visit by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to
India.
As part of the agreement, one of six signed in New
Delhi, PDVSA or Petroleos de Venezuela is taking a stake
in ONGC's refining subsidiary, Mangalore Refinery and
Petrochemicals Ltd.
Processing Venezuelan crude
The agreement between Venezuela, the world's fifth
biggest oil exporter, and India, which imports 70% of
its crude oil needs, will pave the way for the Mangalore
refinery to process Venezuelan crude.
ONGC has been aggressively pursuing energy supplies
abroad and taken stakes in fuel projects in Russia,
Libya, Sudan and Qatar among other countries, and recently
struck an agreement to import natural gas from Iran.
As India's economy, now growing at around 7%, continues
to expand, its reliance on imported crude is expected
to grow to around 85% in the next 20 years.
Chavez, who has said Venezuela is keen to share its
"oil potential" with India, has struck oil
deals with various countries including large ones with
China since last year. |
Russian Defense Minister
Sergei Ivanov said again on Friday that Russia reserves
the right to carry out preventive strikes on terrorist
bases in other countries.
He said Russia will not disclose where and when it
will carry out a strike. "We have never said and
will not say where, when and on the territory of which
country such a strike might be carried out," ITAR-TASS
news agency quoted the minister as saying.
Speaking at a news conference after talks with his
Italian counterpart, Antonio Martino, Ivanov said that
Russia's right on preventive strikes is "supported
by the UN Security Council resolution adopted after
the tragedy in Beslan."
Georgia said earlier that international observers should
be sent to the Pankisi Gorge area because of Russia's
announcements on preventive strikes. Pankisi Gorge is
allegedly a territory where Chechen gunmen are based.
French Interior Minister Dominique de Villepin said
recently that the gorge had become a training base for
al Qaida members after they had moved from Afghanistan.
Ivanov was asked to comment on Georgia's suggestion.
"The Georgian leadership often raises this question,
although we have never named Georgia as the target of
such a strike. Such persistence makes me think of the
Russian saying: 'He who commits a crime thinks everyone
is talking about it'," he said. |
South Korea could
hold large-scale artillery training in the Russian Far
East because of lack of space at home, a newspaper has
reported, a move that may upset North Korea and China,
Reuters reported.
The commander of South Korea's First Army Corps raised
the possibility of renting land for training during
a recent visit to Russia's Khabarovsk region, the JoongAng
Ilbo reported on Saturday, citing an unnamed Defence
Ministry official.
Training facilities in South Korea are considered too
small for large-scale troop exercises involving tanks
and artillery. If an agreement were reached, it would
be the first time the South Korean army had rented overseas
training grounds, the daily said.
The transportation of troops and arms for such training
might well upset North Korea and China, however, the
paper quoted other anonymous officials as saying. |
Chechen separatist
leader Aslan Maskhadov said on Friday a meeting with
Russian President Vladimir Putin will end the war in
Chechnya.
In a statement on a separatist website, Maskhadov said,
"We think that 30 minutes of honest eye-to-eye
talk would be enough to end this war, so as to explain
to the Russian president what Chechens want. To start
this dialogue it would be enough to deal with the following
questions. For Chechnya, the security of the Chechen
people and for Russia, the defense of her regional and
military interests in the North Caucasus."
Maskhadov recalled that the Kremlin had ignored his
offer of peace negotiations and said Putin is not aware
of the real situation in Chechnya. "I think the
Russian president has been led into a grave error. His
special services, his generals, his advisers and his
local puppets are mainly to blame for this," Maskhadov
said.
Earlier this year Maskhadov announced a 30-day ceasefire
but Russian officials called it fake.
The separatist leader also refuted the idea of Al-Qaida's
involvement in the Chechen conflict. "There is
no need to blame Bin Laden or al Qaeda. I am convinced
Bin Laden couldn't even find these republics on the
map," he said. |
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP)
- The Dutch government passed a new terrorism bill
Friday, granting law-enforcement authorities far-reaching
powers of investigation and allowing them to hold
suspects for up to two weeks without charges.
Intelligence agents will be able to use currently
banned techniques such as infiltrating terror cells
for undercover operations and telephone taps, a Justice
Ministry statement said. They will also be allowed
to use entrapment tactics, such as bogus sales transactions.
The law must be approved by parliament. [...] |
These photos show that the Citgo Station provided
an excellent unobstructed view of the Pentagon crash
site.
Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras
are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded
the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the
pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI
was here within minutes and took
the film."
Karl Schwarz has the full
story on All of the missing Pentagon videos:
|
OTTAWA (CP) - Prime Minister
Paul Martin personally offended
George W. Bush with his handling of the missile defence
decision, says a senior American official.
And that could make it tougher for Martin to warm
frosty political relations when he meets with the
U.S. president in Texas this month.
U.S. State Department source told The Canadian Press
that Bush is upset Martin didn't tell him personally
about Canada's decision not to join the missile plan
when the two met at the NATO summit in Brussels last
week.
The source said Bush asked Martin specifically about
the matter during a brief conversation and the prime
minister didn't mention that a decision had been made.
A short time later, Foreign Affairs Minister Pierre
Pettigrew told his American counterpart Canada was
opting out.
American officials had previously said only that
they were frustrated by the decision, seeing it as
a big letdown from a close ally.
But Bush's disappointment hasn't stopped a planned
meeting with Martin and Mexican President Vicente
Fox. And the Prime Minister's Office was quick to
seize on the fact the meeting will include lunch at
Bush's ranch, where he entertains his closest allies.
"The United States administration is disappointed
with the decision, but they recognize that the decision
was Canada's to make," a PMO source Thursday.
"Moreover, the prime minister will be meeting
President Bush and President Fox at the ranch in Crawford.
Surely those public comments and actions speak louder
than off-the-record whispers." [...]
Then on Thursday, the U.S. Senate voted to overturn
the Bush administration's decision to lift the cattle
ban, which was imposed on Canadian cattle nearly two
years ago because of mad cow disease.
Some Martin critics have suggested
the missile defence decision affected the latest developments
and that the White House will now back off its efforts
to reopen the border.
But Paul Cellucci, the U.S. ambassador to Canada,
dismissed such notions.
"It's a legal question, it's got nothing to
do with (ballistic missile defence)," he said
Thursday. [...] |
TORONTO -- Some call it protectionism,
others payback. But ranchers
in Western Canada agree the U.S. ban on Canadian beef
is no longer about mad cow disease.
The Senate voted Thursday to overturn the Bush administration's
decision to allow Canadian cattle into the country
nearly two years after they were banned because of
brain-wasting illness. The vote came a day after a
U.S. federal judge granted a temporary injunction
by U.S. ranchers.
Danny Rosehill of the Olds Auction Mart in Calgary
said U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull's ruling was
not only biased in favor of cattlemen in Montana but
indicative of the increasingly testy relations between
the world's largest trading partners.
Canada declined to join the U.S.-led invasion of
Iraq and then, last week, Prime Minister Paul Martin
announced Ottawa would opt out of Washington's proposed
continental missile shield. The
White House was so peeved that Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice canceled a trip to Ottawa.
"Why would the United States want to play ball
with us? They come to us with hat in hand, asking
for support on the war, and we say no," Rosehill
said in a telephone interview from Calgary. "They
come to us with hat in hand on this missile thing,
and we say no."
Rosehill speaks for many Albertans in the western
province, Canada's most conservative. Its
leader, Premier Ralph Klein, was one of the few Canadian
leaders to pledge support of the U.S. war in Iraq
and often plays apologist for his traditionally liberal
nation. [...]
John Masswohl, spokesman for the Canadian Cattlemen's
Association, said the court ruling and subsequent
Senate vote has nothing to do with health, missiles
or the Iraqi war.
"None of this is about
food safety or animal health or anything to do with
disease," he said. "It's all about the money."
He said the Senators who voted in favor of the bill
on Thursday mainly represent big beef-producing states
such as North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming. [...] |
Missile
Counter-Attack |
by Lloyd Axworthy
Published on Friday, March 4, 2005
by the Winnipeg Free Press (Canada) |
Axworthy fires back at U.S.
-- and Canadian -- critics of our BMD decision in
An Open Letter to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice
Dear Condi,
I'm glad you've decided to get over your fit of pique
and venture north to visit your closest neighbor.
It's a chance to learn a thing or two. Maybe more.
I know it seems improbable to your divinely guided
master in the White House that mere mortals might
disagree with participating in a missile-defense system
that has failed in its last three tests, even though
the tests themselves were carefully rigged to show
results.
But, gosh, we folks above the 49th parallel are
somewhat cautious types who can't quite see laying
down billions of dollars in a three-dud poker game.
As our erstwhile Prairie-born and bred (and therefore
prudent) finance minister pointed out in presenting
his recent budget, we've had eight years of balanced
or surplus financial accounts. If we're going to spend
money, Mr. Goodale added, it will be on day-care and
health programs, and even on more foreign aid and
improved defense.
Sure, that doesn't match the gargantuan, multi-billion-dollar
deficits that your government blithely runs up fighting
a "liberation war" in Iraq, laying out more
than half of all weapons expenditures in the world,
and giving massive tax breaks to the top one per cent
of your population while cutting food programs for
poor children.
Just chalk that up to a different sense of priorities
about what a national government's role should be
when there isn't a prevailing mood of manifest destiny.
Coming to Ottawa might also expose you to a parliamentary
system that has a thing called question period every
day, where those in the executive are held accountable
by an opposition for their actions, and where demands
for public debate on important topics such a missile
defense can be made openly.
You might also notice that it's a system in which
the governing party's caucus members are not afraid
to tell their leader that their constituents don't
want to follow the ideological, perhaps teleological,
fantasies of Canada's continental co-inhabitant. And
that this leader actually listens to such representations.
Your boss did not avail himself of a similar opportunity
to visit our House of Commons during his visit, fearing,
it seems, that there might be some signs of dissent.
He preferred to issue his diktat on missile defense
in front of a highly controlled, pre-selected audience.
Such control-freak antics may work in the virtual
one-party state that now prevails in Washington. But
in Canada we have a residual belief that politicians
should be subject to a few checks and balances, an
idea that your country once espoused before the days
of empire.
If you want to have us consider your proposals and
positions, present them in a proper way, through serious
discussion across the table in our cabinet room, as
your previous president did when he visited Ottawa.
And don't embarrass our prime minister by lobbing
a verbal missile at him while he sits on a public
stage, with no chance to respond.
Now, I understand that there may have been some
miscalculations in Washington based on faulty advice
from your resident governor of the "northern
territories," Ambassador Cellucci. But you should
know by now that he hasn't really won the hearts and
minds of most Canadians through his attempts to browbeat
and command our allegiance to U.S. policies.
Sadly, Mr. Cellucci has been far too closeted with
exclusive groups of 'experts' from Calgary think-tanks
and neo-con lobbyists at cross-border conferences
to remotely grasp a cross-section of Canadian attitudes
(nor American ones, for that matter).
I invite you to expand the narrow perspective that
seems to inform your opinions of Canada by ranging
far wider in your reach of contacts and discussions.
You would find that what is rising in Canada is not
so much anti-Americanism, as claimed by your and our
right-wing commentators, but fundamental disagreements
with certain policies of your government. You would
see that rather than just reacting to events by drawing
on old conventional wisdoms, many Canadians are trying
to think our way through to some ideas that can be
helpful in building a more secure world.
These Canadians believe that security can be achieved
through well-modulated efforts to protect the rights
of people, not just nation-states.
To encourage and advance international co-operation
on managing the risk of climate change, they believe
that we need agreements like Kyoto.
To protect people against international crimes like
genocide and ethnic cleansing, they support new institutions
like the International Criminal Court -- which, by
the way, you might strongly consider using to hold
accountable those committing atrocities today in Darfur,
Sudan.
And these Canadians believe that the United Nations
should indeed be reformed -- beginning with an agreement
to get rid of the veto held by the major powers over
humanitarian interventions to stop violence and predatory
practices.
On this score, you might want to explore the concept
of the 'Responsibility to Protect' while you're in
Ottawa. It's a Canadian idea born out of the recent
experience of Kosovo and informed by the many horrific
examples of inhumanity over the last half-century.
Many Canadians feel it has a lot more relevance to
providing real human security in the world than missile
defense ever will.
This is not just some quirky notion concocted in
our long winter nights, by the way. It seems to have
appeal for many in your own country, if not the editorialists
at the Wall Street Journal or Rush Limbaugh. As I
discovered recently while giving a series of lectures
in southern California, there is keen interest in
how the U.S. can offer real leadership in managing
global challenges of disease, natural calamities and
conflict, other than by military means.
There is also a very strong awareness on both sides
of the border of how vital Canada is to the U.S. as
a partner in North America. We supply copious amounts
of oil and natural gas to your country, our respective
trade is the world's largest in volume, and we are
increasingly bound together by common concerns over
depletion of resources, especially very scarce fresh
water.
Why not discuss these issues with Canadians who
understand them, and seek out ways to better cooperate
in areas where we agree -- and agree to respect each
other's views when we disagree.
Above all, ignore the Cassandras who deride the
state of our relations because of one missile-defense
decision. Accept that, as a friend on your border,
we will offer a different, independent point of view.
And that there are times when truth must speak to
power.
In friendship,
Lloyd Axworthy
Lloyd Axworthy is president of the University
of Winnipeg and a former Canadian foreign minister.
|
Canada is affectionately referred
to as "our neighbor to the north." Millions
of American school children, and a fair number of
adults, are even under the misapprehension that it
is in fact one of the fifty states. The two
countries share the longest undefended border on earth
and Americans don't have to produce a visa when they
drive to Canada from Detroit or Buffalo.
Those days of conviviality
may be over, thanks to our crazed and arrogant political
leadership. Ever since the days of Ronald Reagan,
defense hawks have been peddling the Strategic Defense
Initiative (SDI), commonly known as Star Wars. The
idea behind SDI is that incoming missiles can be shot
out of the sky, just like in science fiction films.
Every test for SDI has failed. It survives because
defense contractors and their political friends won't
give up when there is a chance to make millions of
dollars. Canadians are luckier.
They have no military industrial complex, or bizarre
notions of national pride. They said no to the missile
shield fantasy.
Our ally was immediately informed that it had no
rights which America need respect, such as rights
to sovereignty over its territory. "We will deploy,"
said American ambassador Paul Cellucci. Canadian Prime
Minister Paul Martin was forced to sound like a lowly
third world potentate. "This is our airspace,
we're a sovereign nation and you don't intrude on
a sovereign nation's airspace without seeking permission."
In the bad old days only brown
skinned nations that ran afoul of U.S. whims had to
grovel in the dirt. Now a mostly white, capitalist
country that borders Montana, Minnesota and Maine
is begging not to be mistreated.
The effort to make America hated and or feared is
continuing unabated. It is quite awful for this country
and for the entire world. But just as clouds have
silver linings, this bad behavior from the Bushmen
may have a positive unintended consequence, assuming
they don't get us all killed first.
The international community is simply ignoring the
United States. Thank goodness. While Americans rant
that Iran should not be part of the exclusive nuclear
club, Russian president Vladimir Putin has put us
on notice that he intends to strengthen relations
with the country next on American's hit list. At a
joint news conference with Dubya, Putin restated his
intention to help Iran develop nuclear technology.
To get an idea of how relations arrived at this
juncture, imagine this scenario. A friend says that
he intends to rob a bank. He'll even throw some money
your way if you help him out. You respond politely
that he is in greater need of mental health care than
extra cash. He ignores you, attempts to rob the bank
and ends up in a shoot out with police. The friend
then pleads with you to stand between him and a hail
of bullets.
Like the hypothetical nutty pal who goes on a crime
spree, Condi Rice met with French President Jacques
Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder to
soften them up before her boss came by and asked for
post bank robbery assistance. She said they were obligated
to help in Iraq. After all, what good is an alliance
that doesn't allow for bailing out a supposed friend?
Americans are split into
two camps. One loves their insane leaderships and
is happy that the rest of the world doesn't. The other
is justifiably frightened but unable to stop the juggernaut.
There is no credible opposition to assist the
sane, reality-based group. All they have is the Democratic
party. Unfortunately, the words credible and opposition
just don't apply to them.
Prime ministers, presidents and
ambassadors will make nice and have Dubya over for
dinner, but they will politely tell him to kiss off.
These men and women are our salvation.
A sidelined America is a less dangerous America.
Imagine the disastrous consequences if there was more
than one Tony Blair toadying for Bush. There would
be little standing in the way of the pirates and their
awful ideas about American global supremacy.
Now even Canada knows that it can't trust its close
neighbor and trading partner.
Is it delusional to think that
Canada could end up like Iraq? God help them if Americans
greedy for oil begin to look north. Before you can
say Halliburton the country would be occupied and
privatized by Dick Cheney's friends.
On the other hand, maybe a mistrustful and frightened
world will keep America in line. As of now, that is
our only hope. |
OTTAWA (CP) - Canadians are
under greater threat than they realize and it's time
their armed forces started treating the country like
a theatre of military operations, the chief of defence
staff said Thursday.
"In some respects, Canada
and Canadians . . . are at more risk now of direct
attack than they have ever been during the Cold War
itself," Gen. Rick Hillier told the Conference
of Defence Associations annual meeting.
The general was followed by the outgoing U.S. ambassador
to Canada, Paul Cellucci, who called on Hillier to
build the forces' technical capabilities and form
a special operations contingent trained in post-war
reconstruction.
Hillier, who is in the final stages of helping draft
a new defence policy, told about 200 military and
civilian delegates that Canada has to boost surveillance
and transport capabilities to meet post-9/11 demands.
"We have to . . . start treating
Canada as an operational theatre."
He described a future in which a larger military
is reorganized under a more efficient and responsive
command-control structure, its critical intelligence
base is fed by unmanned aircraft, its troops and equipment
are transported around Canada and overseas by heavy
aircraft and ships.
Hillier's vision got a boost Feb. 23 when the federal
budget promised $12.8 billion in new defence spending
over the next five years. Most of that money will
come in years four and five, after the forthcoming
defence policy statement takes hold. Initial spending
until then will address fundamental priorities such
as ammunition stockpiles, spare parts and infrastructure.
The new spending was made public just as Prime Minister
Paul Martin also announced last week that Canada would
not join the U.S. ballistic missile defence program.
While Hillier didn't express an opinion on that
decision, he suggested after his speech that Canada's
main concerns may lie elsewhere.
"We've got to recognize that the threat in
the world has changed, that globalization sometimes
brings with it the ability to move those threats around,"
he said outside the meeting.
"Therefore, we have a responsibility to be
prepared to conduct operations in Canada, if necessary.
We've got to now focus on it."
Specifically, he cited terrorism,
organized crime, and
the threat of violence hidden within waves of refugees
from failed and failing states.
He said the military did not focus so much on domestic
security and defence in the past because "the
need wasn't seen to be there."
"We want to look at Canada and consider it
exactly as we would any other theatre of operations,"
he said. "We could have a terrorist incident
in Canada in the future and we need to be ready to
handle that." [...] |
[...]
American policy on torture
White
House Transcript
Feb. 28, 2005
Q: Has the President ever issued an order against
torture of prisoners? And do we still send prisoners
to Syria to be tortured?
A: The President has stated publicly that we do not
condone torture and that he would never authorize
the use of torture. He has made that --
Q: But has he issued an order?
A: -- statement very publicly, and he's made it clear
to everybody in the government that we do not torture.
Q: Well, why do we still hear these stories then?
A: If there are allegations of wrongdoing, then the
President expects those allegations to be fully investigated
and if there is actual wrongdoing that occurs, then
people need to be held to account. The President has
made that very clear.
Q: Well, do you deny that we still send prisoners
to other countries to be tortured? Is
that a denial?
A: Judge Gonzales testified
previously that we have an obligation not to render
people to countries that we know would torture them.
Q: He did not rule out torture.
[McClellan then takes the next question from another
reporter.] |
ONCE they were a byword for mindless docility.
But cows have a complex mental life in which they
bear grudges, nurture friendships and become excited
by intellectual challenges, researchers have found.
Cows are capable of strong emotions such as pain,
fear and even anxiety about the future. But if farmers
provide the right conditions, they can also feel great
happiness.
The findings have emerged from studies of farm animals
that have found similar traits in pigs, goats and
chickens. They suggest such
animals may be so emotionally similar to humans that
welfare laws need to be reconsidered.
The research will be presented to a conference in
London next month sponsored by animal welfare group
Compassion in World Farming.
Christine Nicol, professor of animal
welfare at Britain's Bristol University, said even
chickens might have to be treated as individuals with
needs and problems.
"Remarkable cognitive abilities and cultural
innovations have been revealed," she said. "Our
challenge is to teach others that every animal we
intend to eat or use is a complex individual, and
to adjust our farming culture accordingly."
Her colleague John Webster added: "People have
assumed intelligence is linked to the ability to suffer,
and that because animals have smaller brains they
suffer less than humans. That is a pathetic piece
of logic."
The Bristol researchers have documented how cows
within a herd form friendship groups of between two
and four animals with whom they spend most of their
time, often grooming and licking each other. They
will also dislike other cows, and can bear grudges
for months or years.
Donald Broom, professor of animal welfare at Cambridge
University, will tell the conference how cows can
become excited by solving intellectual challenges.
[...] |
Bobb Kotterman laughed when
he opened the letter inviting
him to become a "force against terrorism."
The letter, posted in January, urged the retiree to
re-enlist in the National Guard, to fight to protect
the American way of life.
Kotterman is 76.
He's a cancer survivor with diabetes and a bad eye.
"Too old to chase girls anymore," he said
yesterday.
He was discharged from the
National Guard in 1949. He was only in 18 months.
His job: running the movie projector. "I
ran films about people getting gonorrhea and syphilis,
that kind of stuff," Kotterman said.
It's not a skill in high demand in Iraq.
Even though recruiting pressure is heavy in the
National Guard -- enlistments have fallen about 30
percent short of recruitment goals -- and
50- and 60-year-olds are among the call-ups,
Kotterman recognized the letter and application form
as a joke. The National Guard, he says, doesn't do
blanket mailings. He reasons that someone sent in
an inquiry with his name -- someone who wasn't a close
friend. The first name on the letter was Willard,
a birth name he has never used. |
James City County Police arrested
an eight-year-old boy who allegedly had a violent
outburst in school.
Authorities say he head-butted his teacher and kicked
an assistant principal when he was told he couldn't
go outside to play with other students.
The four-foot pupil was led away from Williamsburg's
Rawls Byrd Elementary School in handcuffs Tuesday
and charged with disorderly conduct and assault and
battery.
Major Stan Stout says the student began tossing chairs
and turning over desks after a teacher - and later
the assistant principal - tried to stop him from joining
his classmates.
The child was later released to his parents. |
PAPILLION, Neb. (AP) - A father
who said he murdered his son because he believed the
four-year-old was the Antichrist was sentenced Friday
to life in prison without parole.
Ivan Henk pleaded guilty last month to first-degree
murder, a crime he acknowledged during an 2003 court
hearing when he shouted to
the boy's mother that he killed Brendan Gonzalez "because
he was the Antichrist. He had 666 on his forehead."
As part of a plea deal, prosecutors agreed not to
seek the death penalty.
The boy, who vanished Jan. 6, 2003, was reported
last seen with Henk. Cass County Attorney Nathan Cox
has said Henk killed the child in his mother's garage.
The body has not been found. Henk led authorities
to a trash bin in an Omaha suburb that had dried blood
that matched Brendan's DNA but volunteers who sifted
through the landfill where the bin was emptied found
nothing after nearly two months of searching. [...] |
NEWPORT, Ore. -- An earthquake
"swarm" that began last weekend has resulted
in thousands of small earthquakes
off the Oregon coast in recent days but the
size of the quakes did not pose any tsunami threat,
officials said.
Scientists from Oregon State University said they
are joining National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
researchers on Saturday for a cruise to investigate
a site on the undersea Juan de Fuca Ridge northwest
of Astoria called the Endeavor segment.
"These earthquake swarms are associated with
seafloor spreading," said Robert P. Dziak, an
Oregon State oceanographer who works with NOAA at
the university's Hatfield Marine Science Center in
Newport.
"We suspect what happened was that magma pushed
up into the crust and the lava may have broken the
surface," Dziak said.
The quakes are generally small and not a tsunami
threat, although a section
of the sea floor off the Northwest coast called the
Cascadia subduction zone is similar to the Indian
Ocean area that produced a magnitude 9 quake and tsunami
that devastated southeast Asia last December.
The much smaller quakes off the Northwest coast
generally ranged from magnitude 2 to magnitude 4 and
typically occur in swarms during seafloor spreading
events, scientists said.
During the first 36 hours of the swarm, nearly 1,500
small quakes were detected. The undersea quake activity
was continuing at a "moderate pace," Dziak
said. |
ANCHORAGE, Alaska -- Volcanic
rumblings at Mount Spurr are creating hazardous conditions
for extreme skiers, snowboarders and pilots landing
in the area, the Alaska Volcano Observatory said Friday.
Possible dangers include
unstable snow and ice, higher concentrations of potentially
lethal gases and acidic water that could be strong
enough to burn skin, observatory officials
said. Heightened seismic activity has been recorded
there for months.
New measurements taken during flights over the volcano
this week show the presence of sulfur dioxide, indicating
activity stemming from molten lava, not simply heating
of ground water, said Tom Murray, a scientist with
the U.S. Geological Survey who works at the observatory's
Anchorage office. Carbon dioxide also has been detected.
During the flyovers, researchers also spotted water
at a summit lake bubbling up - either from increasing
heat or gases floating to the top, Murray said.
"We just want people to know this is not a
normal mountain," Murray said. "They need
to be thinking beyond the normal rules. Climbing is
already inherently risky as it is."
The observatory's current level of concern is yellow,
signifying activity as "restless." [...] |
With temperatures remaining
stubbornly high and snowfall uncommonly low, state
and federal officials are likely to declare a drought
emergency for Washington as early as next week, intensifying
concerns that this summer could spawn serious wildfires
and financial misery for farmers.
Gov. Christine Gregoire is scheduled to meet with
federal officials early next week to review snow and
weather data, clearing the way for a decision by Thursday,
a state official said.
But from what she's already seen, Gregoire is virtually
certain that a drought emergency will be declared.
The only question, she said, is how much of the state
will be covered. [...] |
YAKIMA, Wash. -- Skies are blue
and mountains are bereft of snow across the Northwest
this year. And while many people might be reveling
in the unexpected early spring, water managers in
several states are crossing their fingers and hoping
winter will make another appearance.
It's all about staving off the dreaded 'd' word:
drought.
"Every day that goes by that we don't get snow,
we just fall further behind," said Ted Day, a
hydraulic engineer with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
in Boise, Idaho.
Authorities are bracing for a seventh year of drought
in Montana, where the mountains are so bare that peaks
will need three times the usual snowfall between now
and when the spring runoff begins just to reach average
levels.
In Idaho, snowpack is at about 50 percent of average
with the lone bright spot - albeit a rather dim one
- being Eastern Idaho at 75 percent of average. Parts
of the state already have endured five straight years
of drought.
Conditions are even grimmer in Washington, where
snowpack stands at just 16 percent of average in some
places. Spokane saw the driest
February since record-keeping started in 1881.
In famously rainy Seattle, joggers in shorts crowd
waterfront sidewalks to enjoy the unusual sunshine,
while the almost snow-free peaks of the Olympic Mountains
loom across Puget Sound.
The Northwest hasn't been
this parched in the winter in nearly three decades,
raising concerns about early wildfires and low streamflows,
which could limit the hydropower supply, reduce water
for irrigators and threaten endangered fish. [...]
|
Astronomers have found the tiniest
full-fledged star known, an object just 16 percent
bigger than Jupiter. It is smaller than some known
planets that orbit other stars.
The star is a companion to a Sun-like star toward
the center of our Milky Way Galaxy. It was found and
measured by observing changes in the light output
of the system when the smaller star passes in front
of the larger star from our vantagepoint.
The discovery helps astronomers better understand
a gray area of definition concerning stars and planets.
Between planets and stars, there exist odd objects
called brown dwarfs. They're often referred to as
failed stars, because they don't have enough mass
to trigger the thermonuclear fusion that powers real
stars, like the Sun. A brown dwarf is typically several
times the mass of Jupiter, but astronomers haven't
determined the exact size or mass cutoffs on either
end.
The new discovery, announced Thursday, puts a firm
diameter measurement on the smallest star that does
in fact shine normally.
The result shows stars less than one-tenth the mass
of the Sun can generate thermonuclear fusion while
being barely bigger than Jupiter. [...]
"This result shows the existence of stars that
look strikingly like planets," said Frederic
Pont of the Geneva Observatory in Switzerland, another
member of the study team. [...] |
Republican media adviser R. Gregory
Stevens, who recently served as co-chairman of the
Bush/Cheney Entertainment Task Force, was found dead
Saturday in the Hollywood home of actress Carrie Fisher.
[...]
Mr. Stevens, who was an associate of the Washington
powerhouse lobbying group Barbour, Griffith &
Rogers, also helped orchestrate the firm's star-studded
party for watching the inaugural parade and was known
to have deep roots in the Hollywood community. [...]
A native of San Clemente, Calif., Mr. Stevens began
his career working for the California Republican Party,
and later worked on the Bush/Quayle 1988 presidential
campaign.
After President Bush's election, Mr. Stevens served
as White House liaison to the Department of Housing
and Urban Development, where he managed all White
House transition issues, according to his official
biography.
From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Stevens was an associate with
Black, Manafort, Stone and Kelly, an international
public affairs and lobbying firm. He advised foreign
and domestic clients, and worked on presidential elections
in Angola, Kenya, Nigeria, Thailand and the Philippines.
[...] |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|