|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
Heart
of Ice
Copyright 2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
In 2004 the atrocity of US troops abusing Iraqi POWs
exposed the dark side of human rights performance of the
United States. The scandal shocked the humanity and was
condemned by the international community. It is quite
ironic that on Feb. 28 of this year, the State Department
of the United States once again posed as the "the
world human rights police" and released its Country
Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2004. As in previous
years, the reports pointed fingers at human rights situation
in more than 190 countries and regions (including China)
but kept silent on the US misdeeds in this field. Therefore,
the world people have to probe the human rights record
behind the Statue of Liberty in the United States.
I. On Life, Liberty and Security of Person
American society is characterized with rampant violent
crimes, severe infringement of people's rights by law
enforcement departments and lack of guarantee for people's
rights to life, liberty and security of person.
Violent crimes pose a serious threat to people's lives.
According to a report released by the Department of Justice
of the United States on Nov. 29, 2004, in 2003 residents
aged 12 and above in the United States experienced about
24 million victimizations, and there occurred 1,381,259
murders, robberies and other violent crimes, averaging
475 cases per 100,000 people. Among them there were 16,503
homicides, up 1.7 percent over 2002, or nearly six cases
in every 100,000 residents, and one of every 44 Americans
aged above 12 was victimized.
The Associated Press reported on June 24, 2004 that the
number of violent crimes in many US cities were on the
rise. In 2003 Chicago alone recorded 598 homicides, 80
percent of which involved the use of guns. The Washington
D.C. reported 41,738 murders, robberies and other violent
crimes in 2003, averaging 6,406.4 cases per 100,000 residents.
In 2004 the District recorded 198 killings, or a homicide
rate of 35 per 100,000 residents. Detroit,which has less
than 1 million residents, recorded 18,724 criminal cases
in 2003, including 366 murders and 814 rapes, which amounted
to a homicide rate of 41 per 100,000 residents.
In 2003 the homicide rate in Baltimore was 43 per 100,000
residents. The Baltimore Sun reported on Dec. 17, 2004
that the city reported 271 killings from January to early
December in 2004.
It was reported that on Sept. 8, 2004 that by Sept. 4,
2004 there had been 368 homicides in the city, up 4.2
percent year-on-year. The USA Today reported on July 16,
2004 that in an average week in the US workplace one employee
is killed and at least 25 are seriously injured in violent
assaults by current or former co-workers. The Cincinnati
Post reported on Nov. 12, 2004 that homicides average
17 a week and there are nearly 5,500 violent assaults
a day at US job sites.
The United States has the biggest number of gun owners
and gun violence has affected lots of innocent lives.
According to a survey released by the University of Chicago
in 2001, 41.7 percent of men and 28.5 percent of women
in the United States report having a gun in their homes,
and 29.2 percent of men and 10.2 percent of women personally
own a gun. The Los Angeles Times reported on Jul. 19,
2004 that since 2000 the number of firearm holders rose
28 percent in California.
About 31,000 Americans are killed and 75,000 wounded
by firearms each year, which means more than 80 people
are shot dead each day. In 2002 there were 30,242 firearm
killings in the United States; 54 percent of all suicides
and 67 percent of all homicides were related to the use
of firearms. The Associated Press reported that 808 people
were shot dead in the first half of 2004 in Detroit.
Police violence and infringement of human rights by law
enforcement agencies also constitute a serious problem.
At present, 5,000 law enforcement agencies in the United
States use TASER - a kind of electric shock gun, which
sends out 50,000 volts of impulse voltage after hitting
the target. Since 1999, more than 80 people died from
TASER shootings, 60 percent of which occurred between
November 2003 and November 2004.
A survey found that in the 17 years from 1985 to 2002,
Los Angeles recorded more than 100 times increase in police
shooting at automobile drivers, killing at least 25 and
injuring more than 30 of them. Of these cases, 90 percent
were due to misjudgment. (The Los Angeles Times, Feb.
29, 2004.)
On Jul. 21, 2004 Chinese citizen Zhao Yan was handcuffed
and severely beaten while she was in the United States
on a normal business trip. She suffered injuries in many
parts of her body and serious mental harm.
The New York Times reported on Apr. 19, 2004 a comprehensive
study of 328 criminal cases over the last 15 years in
which the convicted person was exonerated suggests that
there are thousands of innocent people in prison today.
The study identified 199 murder exoneration, 73 of them
in capital cases. In more than half of the cases, the
defendants had been in prison for more than 10 years.
The United States characterizes itself as "a paradise
for free people," but the ratio of its citizens deprived
of freedom has remained among the highest in the world.
Statistics released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation
last November showed that the nation made an estimated
13.6 million arrests in 2003. The national arrest rate
was 4,695.1 arrests per 100,000 people, 0.2 percent up
than that of the previous year (USA Today, Nov. 8, 2004).
According to statistics from the Department of Justice,
the number of inmates in the United States jumped from
320,000 in 1980 to 2 million in 2000, a hike by six times.
From 1995 to 2003, the number of inmates grew at an annual
rate of 3.5 percent in the country, where one out of every
142 people is behind bars. The number of convicted offenders
may total more than 6 million if parolees and probationers
are also counted. The Chicago Tribune reported on Nov.
8 last year that the federal and state prison population
amounted to 1.47 million last year, 2.1 percent more than
in 2003. The number of criminals rose by over 5 percent
in 11 states, with the growth in North Dakota up by 11.4
percent and in Minnesota by 10.3 percent.
Most prisons in the United States are overcrowded, but
still cannot meet the demand. The country has spent an
average of 7 billion US dollars a year building new jails
and prisons in the past 10 years. California
has seen only one college but 21 new prisons built since
1984.
Jails have become one of the huge
and most lucrative industries, with a combined staff of
more than 530,000 and being the second largest employer
in the United States only after the General Motors. Private
prisons are more and more common. The country now has
over 100 private prisons in 27 states and 18 private prison
companies. The value of goods and services created by
inmates surged from 400 million US dollars in 1980 to
1.1 billion US dollars in 1994. Abuse of prisoners and
violence occur frequently in US jails and prisons, which
are under disorderly management. The Los Angeles Times
reported on Aug. 15 last year that over 40 state prison
systems were once under some form of court order, for
brutality, crowding, poor food and lack of medical care.
The NewsWeek of the United States also reported last
May that in Pennsylvania, Arizona and some other states,
inmates are routinely stripped in front of others before
being moved to a new prison or a new unit within their
prison. Male inmates are often made to wear women's pink
underwear as a form of humiliation. New inmates are frequently
beaten and cursed at and sometimes made to crawl.
At a jail in New York City, some guards bump prisoners
against the walls, pinch their arms and wrists, and force
them to receive insulting checks nakedly. Some male inmates
are sometimes compelled to stand in the nude before a
group of women guards. Some female inmates go in shackles
to hospital for treatment and nursing after they get ill
or pregnant, some give births without a midwife, and some
are locked to sickbeds with fetters after Caesarean operation.
Over 80,000 women prisoners in the United States are
mothers, and the overall number of the minor children
of the American women prisoners is estimated at some 200,000.
The country had more than 3,000 pregnant women in jails
from 2000 to 2003 and 3,000 babies were born to the prisoners
during this period (see Mexico's Milenio on Feb. 21, 2004).
It is estimated that at least more than 40,000 prisoners
are locked up in the so-called "super jails",
where the prisoner is confined to a very tiny cell, cannot
see other people throughout the year, and has only one
hour out for exercise every day.
Sexual harassment and encroachment are common in jails
in the Unite States. The New York Times reported last
October that at least 13 percent of inmates in the country
are sexually assaulted in prison (Ex-Inmate's Suit Offers
View Into Sexual Slavery in Prisons, The New York Times,
Oct. 12, 2004). In jails of seven central and western
US states, 21 percent of the inmates suffer sexual abuse
at least once after being put in prison. The ratio is
higher among women inmates, with nearly one fourth of
them sexually assaulted by jail guards.
II. On Political Rights and Freedom
The United States claims to be "a
paragon of democracy," but American democracy is
manipulated by the rich and malpractices are common.
Elections in the United States
are in fact a contest of money. The presidential
and Congressional elections last year cost nearly 4 billion
US dollars, some 1 billion US dollars or one third more
than that spent in the 2000 elections. The 2004 presidential
election has been listed as the most expensive campaign
in the country's history (see http://www.opensecrets.org/overview),
with the cost jumping to 1.7 billion US dollars from 1
billion US dollars in 2000. To win the election, the Democratic
Party and Republican Party had to try their utmost to
raise funds.
The Washington Post reported on Dec. 3 last year that
the Democratic Party collected 389.8 million US dollars
in electoral funds and the Republican Party raised 385.3
million US dollars, both hitting a record high (see Fundraising
Records Broken by Both Major Political Parties, Washington
Post on Dec. 3, 2004).
Data released by the Federal Election Commission (FEC)
on Dec. 14, 2004 show the average spending for Senate
races was 2,518,750 US dollars in 2004, with the highest
reaching 31,488,821 US dollars; and the average spending
for House races was 511,043 US dollars (see http://www.opensecrets.org/overview),
with the highest reaching 9,043,293 US dollars (see http://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topraces.asp?cycle=2004).
The Republican Party, the Democratic Party and their
periphery organizations spent a total of 1.2 billion US
dollars on TV commercials, making this presidential election
the most expensive in history. The TV commercials were
broadcast 750,000 times, twice of the airings in the general
election in 2000. In the Oct. 1 - 13 period in 2004, the
Republican Party spent 14.5 million US dollars on advertising,
and the Democratic Party's advertising spending amounted
to 24 million US dollars in the first 20 days of October
2004.
In the elections, political parties and interest groups
not only donated money for their favorite candidates,
but also directly spent funds on maximizing their influence
upon the elections. In Maryland, some corporate bosses
donated as much as 130,000 US dollars. In return, the
candidates after being elected would serve the interests
of big political donators. The Baltimore Sun called this
"Buying Power" (see "Buying Power",
The Baltimore Sun, April 5, 2004). Due to the fact that
local judges in 38 states need to be elected, quite a
number of candidates began campaign advertising and looking
for big donators. Some interest groups also got themselves
involved in the judge election campaign.The US election
system has quite a few flaws. The newly adopted Help America
Vote Act of 2004 requires voters to offer a series of
documents such as a stable residence or identification
in registering, which in reality disenfranchises thousands
of homeless people.
The United States is the only country
in the world that rules out ex-inmates' right to vote,
which disenfranchises 5 million ex-inmates and 13 percent
male black people (see Milenio, Mexico, Oct. 22 2004).
The 2004 US presidential election reported many problems,
including counting errors, machine malfunctions, registration
confusion, legal uncertainty, and lack of respect for
voters. According to a report carried by the USA Today
on Dec. 28, 2004, due to counting errors, a review of
election results in 10 counties nationwide by the Scripps
Howard News Service found more than 12,000 ballots that
weren't counted in the presidential race, almost one in
every 10 ballots cast in those counties. Due to machine
malfunctions, 92,000 ballots failed to record a vote for
president in Ohio alone. Registration confusion made four
fifths of the states go into the election without computerized
statewide voter databases (see "Election Day Leftovers",
USA Today, Dec. 28, 2004). The Democratic Party brought
35 lawsuits against the Republican Party in at least 17
states, charging the latter with threatening and blocking
voters from registering or voting, especially minority
ethnic groups. In Florida, the cases of black people being
removed from voter registration list or their votes being
denied were 10 times higher than people of other races.
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) reported on
Sept. 22, 2004 that during the period of election, someone
often distributed handbills to black voters to bilk and
intimidate them by saying that anyone who defaulted electricity
bills, apartment bills or parking fines would be arrested
outside the polling booths. Some others pretended to be
plainclothes outside polling booths and demanded voters
show their identifications. However, black people who
were able to present photo identification were less than
one fifth of white people, therefore, many of them were
rejected.
In the meantime, fabrications of disputable pictures
and statements were put in the agenda of political maneuvers.
Campaign advertisement and political debates were full
of distorted facts, false information and lies. According
to statistics of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of
University of Pennsylvania, campaign advertisement for
the 2004 US presidential election had a large proportion
of false information that was enough to mislead voters,
far beyond 50 percent in 1996. In the Republican camp,
at least 75 percent contained untrue information and personal
attacks. The website of the center (http://www.FactCheck.org)
listed at least 100 items of such information.
The US freedom of the press is
filled with hypocrisy. Power and intimidation hang
over the halo of press freedom. The New York Times published
a commentary on March 30, 2004, saying that the US government's
reliance on slandering had reached an unprecedented level
in contemporary American political history, and the government
prepared to abuse power at any moment to threat potential
critics.
A collected works, Zensor USA, revealed that whenever
the faults of government dignitaries or big companies
were touched, the strong American press censorship system
would snap at the journalists who insisted on investigation
and made them the last sacrificial lamb. (see Das Schweigen
der Journalisten, Handelsblatt, Germany, March 17, 2004).
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) kept watch
on a leader of freedom of speech movement in University
of California at Berkeley for a decade long. Although
no record showed he violated federal laws, the FBI hired
someone to keep monitoring his daily activities and collect
his personal information without permission from the court.
(see SingTao Daily, Oct. 11, 2004).
On July 16, 2004 the US State Department made a regulation,
in violation of the norms of most other countries, that
foreign reporters should leave the country while waiting
for the valid period of their visas to be extended. The
annual report of Native American Journalists Association
criticized the US administration for the move, which severely
infringes upon press freedom. (see AP story, Antigua,
Guatemala Oct. 24, 2004).
Someone with the American Society of Newspaper Editors
said that the US administration's measures reflected its
repulsion of foreign news media. (see Milenio, Mexico,
June 20, 2004). In Iraq, the United States on the one
hand alleged that it had brought democracy to the Iraqi
people, on the other hand it suppressed public opinion.
On March 28, 2004 US troops closed down a Shiite newspaper
in Baghdad, which triggered a protest demonstration by
thousands of Iraqi people.
On Sept. 27, the Association of American University Presses,
Association of American Publishers and other organizations
jointly lodged a complaint to the district court of Manhattan,
New York, charging the Office of Foreign Assets Control
under the Department of the Treasury with deliberately
preventing literary works of Iranian, Cuban and Sudanese
writers from entering the United States and turning the
economic sanctions against the three countries into a
"censorship system" to stop free dissemination
of information and ideology. (see Xinhua story, Sept.
30, 2004).
In another case, eight reporters, including Jim Taricani
of the TV station in Providence, Rhode Island with the
National Broadcasting Company (NBC), Judith Miller of
The New York Times, and Matthew Cooper of Time magazine,
were declared guilty for they declined to disclose the
confidential sources of news. The New York Times pointed
out on Nov. 10, 2004 that through these cases, it was
found out that press freedom suffered rampant infringement.
In addition, in recent years, over
a dozen foreign journalists have been detained in airports
in the United States, including the one in Los Angeles.
In March 2003, a Danish press-photographer was expelled
out of the country after a DNA test. A Swiss journalist
was rejected from entry of an airport in Washington D.C.
The airport staffs by force took pictures and finger prints
of the journalist. Meanwhile, he was not permitted to
contact the Swiss embassy in the Unite States. In May,
two groups of French journalists, altogether six members,
were rejected of entry the US territory. They simply came
to the Unite States to cover an exposition. Two Dutch
journalists fell into trouble when they were covering
a film award ceremony. In October and December, one British
reporter and one Austrian journalist were held up at US
airports respectively. In early May, 2004, a British female
journalist, who was sent by The Guardian to Los Angeles
to cover some events, was detained at the Los Angeles
airport and faced interrogation and body search, and then
was handcuffed and taken to the detention house in the
downtown. There, she was detained for 26 hours before
sent back to Britain.
III. On Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights
The United States refuses to ratify the
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
rights and took negative attitude to the economic, social
and cultural rights of the laborers. Poverty, hunger and
homelessness have haunted the world richest country.
The population of people living
in poverty has been on a steady rise. According to a report
by The Sun on July, 6, 2004, from 1970 to 2000 (adjusted
for inflation), the bottom 90 percent's average income
stagnated while the top 10 percent experienced an average
yearly income increase of nearly 90 percent. Upper-middle-and-upper-class
families that constitute the top 10 percent of the income
distribution are prospering while many among the remaining
90 percent struggle to maintain their standard of living.
Worsening income disparities have formed two Americas.
(Two Americas, The Baltimore Sun, July 6, 2004). According
to a report of the Wall Street Journal on June 15, 2004,
a study on the fall of 2003 by Arthur Kennickell of the
Board of Governor of the Federal Reserve System showed
that the nation's wealthiest 1 percent owned 53 percent
of all the stocks held by families or individuals, and
64 percent of the bonds. They control more than a third
of the nation's wealth. ( US Led a Resurgence Last Year
Among Millionaires World-Wide, The Wall Street Journal,
June 15, 2004). In Washington D.C., the top 20 percent
of the city's households have 31 times the average income
of the 20 percent at the bottom. (D.C. Gap in Wealth Growing,
The Washington Post, July 22, 2004).
Since November 2003, the average
income of most American families have been on the decline.
The earning of many medium and low-income families could
not keep up with the price rises. They could barely
handle the situation. According to the statistics released
by the US Census Bureau in 2004, the number of Americans
in poverty has been climbing for three years. It rose
by 1.3 million year-on-year in 2003 to 35.9 million. The
poverty rate in 2003 hit 12.5 percent, or one in eight
people, the highest since 1998. (Census: Poverty Rose
By Million, USA Today, August 27, 2004, More Americans
Were Uninsured and Poor in 2003, Census Finds, The New
York Times, August 27, 2004).
The homeless population continues
to rise nationwide. On Dec. 15, 2004, an annual
survey report released at the US Conference of Mayors
showed that the number of people seeking emergency food
aid increased by 14 percent year-on-year while the number
of people seeking emergency shelter aid increased by 6
percent. (http://www.usmayors.org). It is estimated that
the homeless population reached 3.5 million in the United
States. But the US Federal budget has stopped providing
fund to build new affordable housing, which forced many
local governments to cut the public housing projects.
The city of San Diego has a homeless population of 8,000,
but the government could only provide 3,000 temporary
beds. Those without lodging tickets are regarded illegal
to live on the streets. They would be summoned or detained.
In January 2004, an investigator with the US Commission
on Human Right denounced the US for large-scale infringement
on human rights on housing issue.
The health insurance crisis has
become prominent. A report of the Washington Post
on Sept. 28, 2004 said health insurance costs posted their
fourth straight year of double-digit increases in 2004.
Over the past four years, health insurance costs have
leaped 59 percent - about five times faster than both
wage growth and inflation. Around 14.3 million Americans
put one fourth of their income on the health expenses.
(Higher Costs, Less Care, The Washington Post, September
28, 2004). Currently, family health insurance plan costs
more than 10,000 US dollars each year. Many families could
not afford it. Fewer workers have coverage - 61 percent
in 2004, compared with 65 percent in 2001. (Health Plan
Costs Jump 11%, The Washington Post, September 10, 2004)
Compared with 2003, the number of people without health
insurance increased 1.4 million to 45 million, or 15.6
percent of the country's population. (Census: Poverty
Rose by Million, USA Today, August 27, 2004). In Texas,
about one fourth of the workers don't have health insurance.
(Spain Uprising newspaper, May 11, 2004). In California,
around 6 million Californians don't have health insurance
and the welfare system with the annual cost of 60 billion
US dollars are about to collapse. (The Los Angeles Times,
May 6, 2004). Meanwhile, medical accidents occurred one
after another, becoming the third killer following heart
disease and cancer. According to a report of Boston Globe
on July 27, 2004, one out of every 25 in-patients become
the victim of medical accident. From 2000 to 2002, 195,000
people died of medical accidents each year. The actual
figure might be twice of that.
IV. On Racial Discrimination
Racial discrimination has been deeply
rooted in the United States, permeating into every aspects
of society.
The colored people are generally
poor, with living condition much worse than the white.
According to a report of The Guardian of Britain on Oct.
9, 2004, the average net assets of a white family is 88,000
US dollars in 2002, 11 times of a family of Latin American
ancestry, or nearly 15 times of a family of African ancestry.
Nearly one third of the African ancestry families and
26 percent of the Latin American ancestry families have
negative net assets. 74 percent of the white families
have their own houses, while only 47 percent of families
of the African and Latin American ancestry have their
own houses. The market value of houses bought by black
families is only 65 percent of those of white people.
Black people's encounter of mortgage loans refusal for
house purchase or furniture is twice that of white people.
Some black families don't even think of buying their own
houses. The death rate of illness, accident and murder
among the black people is twice that of the white.
The rate of being victim of murders
for the black people is five times that of the white.
The rate of being affected by AIDS for the black people
is ten times that of the whites while the rate of being
diagnosed by diabetes for the black people is twice that
of the whites. (The State Of Black America 2004,
Issued by National Urban League on March 24, 2004, http://www.nuL.org/pdf/sobaexec.pdf).
Statistics show that the number of black
people living in poverty is three times that of the white.
The average life expectancy of the black is six years
shorter than the white.
People of minority ethnic groups are biased against in
employment and occupation. The Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission of the United States received 29,000 complaints
in 2003 of racial bias in the workplace (Racism in the
21st Century, published in USA Today May 5, 2004 issue).
Statistics provided by the United States Department of
Labor also suggest that by November 2004, the unemployment
rate for black and white people is 10.8 percent and 4.7
percent respectively (http://bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf).
In New York City, one of every two black men between 16
and 64 was not working by 2003 (see Nearly Half of Black
Men Found Jobless, published by The New York Times on
Feb. 28 2004). Black people not only have fewer job opportunities,
but also earn less than white people. Even with the same
job, a black man only earns 70 percent of that for a white
man. Regions such as California, where immigrants make
up a larger proportion of the local population, are almost
like traps of death. Mexican Laborers who have come to
work in the United States have a mortality as high as
80 percent.
Teenagers from at least 38 countries
work like slaves (EFE San Francisco, Sept. 26,
2004). Out of 45 million people who are unable to afford
Medicare in the United States, 7 million are African-Americans,
accounting for about one fifth of the total African-Americans
in the States. The proportion is 77 percent higher than
that for the white people (available here).
The Declaration of Independence said all men are created
equal, so the gap between black and white people is simply
an insult to the founding essence of the United States
(see US News and World Report on March 29, 2004).
Apartheid runs rampant at schools of the United States.
On May 17, 1954, Chief justice Earl Warren of the Supreme
Court announced the court's decision over a case known
as Brown v. Board of Education that the doctrine of "separate
but equal" had no place in US public schools. Fifty
years later, white children and black children in the
United States still lead largely separate lives. One in
eight southern black students attends a school that is
99 percent black. About a third attend schools that are
at least 90 percent minority. In the Northeast, by contrast,
more than half of blacks attend such schools (Schools
and Lives Are Still Separate, The Washington Post, May
17, 2004).
Racism recurs on campus of American universities. Fascist
slogans and posters promoting superiority of white people,
along with threats by weapon or words were found on college
campuses including University of California at Berkeley.
Protests were sparked off when Santa Rosa Junior College
in California published anti-Semitism opinions in a column
article in its campus newspaper and the chat room of its
website were dominated by white-superior surfers. At Dartmouth
College, white girl students auctioned off black slaves
in fund-raising activities. At the University of Southern
Mississippi, hordes of white students assaulted four black
students, chanting racist slogans after a football match
was over. At Olivet College of Michigan State, where there
are only 55 black students, 51 of the black students quitted
school after racial cases of violence or harassment (see
The China Press, a Chinese language newspaper published
in New York, on April 17, 2004).
Racial prejudice has made social
conflicts to become acute, causing a rise in hate crimes.
Racial prejudice, most often directed at black people,
was behind more than half of the nation's 7,489 reported
hate crime incidents in 2003, the FBI said on Nov.22
2004. Race bias was behind 3,844 of the total cases in
2003, FBI claimed after having made statistics of hate
crimes handled by 16 percent of the law-enforcement organizations
in the States.
Reports of hate crimes motivated by anti-black bias totaled
2,548 in 2003, accounting for 51.4 percent of the total,
more than double the total hate crimes against all other
racial groups. There were 3,150 black victims in these
reports, according to the annual FBI figures (AP, Washington,
Jan. 26, 2004). And with regard to the attribute of race,
among the 6,934 reported offenders, 62.3 percent were
white (http:/www.fbi.gov/pressrel/presssrel04/pressel/12204.htm).
In a related development, because of
the "lingering atmosphere of fear" stemming
from the Sept. 11 attacks and fallout from the Iraq War,
there were 1,019 anti-Muslim incidents in the United States
in 2003, representing a 69 percent increase. There were
221 incidents in 2003 of anti-muslim bias in California,
tripled a year ago (Los Angeles Times, May 3).
Racial prejudice is ubiquitous
in judicial fields. The proportion for persons of colored
races being sentenced or being imprisoned is notably higher
than whites. In accordance with a report published
in November 2004 by the US Department of Justice, colored
races accounted for over 70 percent of inmates in the
United States. And 29 percent of black people have the
experience of being in jail for once. Black people
make up 12.3 percent of the population in the United States,
but by the end of 2003, out of 1.4 million prisoners who
are serving jail terms above one year at the federal or
state prisons, 44 percent were blacks, or on average,
3,231 in every 100,000 African-Americans were criminals.
Latino-American inmates make up 19 percent of the total
prisoners, or 1,778 in every 100,000 Latino-Americans
are inmates. Inmates of other color races account for
21 percent (http://wwww.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/P03.htm).
At the end of 2003, 12.8 percent of black men aged 25
to 29 were in prison (Chicago Tribune, Nov. 8, 2004),
compared 1.6 percent of white men in the same group (A
Growing Need for Reform, The Baltimore Sun, June 20, 2004).
Blacks receive, on average, a longer felony sentence than
whites. A black person's average jail sentence is six
months longer than a white's for the same crime. Blacks
who are arrested are 3 times more likely to be imprisoned
than whites who are arrested. White felons are more likely
to get probation than blacks. (see the State Black America
2004, issued by National Urban League on March 24, 2004,
http://www.nul.org/pdf/sobaexec.pdf).
After the Sept. 11 incident, the United
States openly restricts the rights of citizens under the
cloak of homeland security, and uses diverse means including
wire tapping of phone conversations and secret investigations,
checks on all secret files, and monitoring transfers of
fund and cash flows to supervise activities of its citizens,
in which, people of ethnic minority groups, foreigners
and immigrants become main victims.
Statistics show that after the
Sept. 11 attacks, 32 million were investigated out of
racial prejudice concern throughout the United States.
Among the people being investigated out of racial prejudice
concern, African-Americans made up 47 percent, followed
by people of Latino and Asian origins. White Americans
only account for 3 percent. On June 23, 2004, authorities
with the Los Angeles Police Department and the US Federal
Bureau of Investigation authorities investigated the televised
beating of a black suspect by white police in Los Angeles
that has resurrected the explosive spectre of the 1991
Rodney King assault. Eight police officers have been removed
from regular duties following the incident on June 23
in which three of them were seen tackling the suspected
black car thief, one beating him repeatedly with a metal
flashlight (AFP, Los Angeles, June 24, 2004).
In the meantime, the anti-immigrant
trend has become increasingly serious in the States.
The US Department of Homeland Security announced in November
2004 that 157,281 immigrants were repatriated in one year,
up 8 percent from a year ago, a record high. The number
of foreigners arrested without any documents also went
up by 112 percent (Argentina La Nacion, Nov. 21, 2004).
Another report says starting from last year, many American
cities such as San Francisco, Baltimore, Philadelphia,
Miami, Saint Paul, Denver, Kansas and Portland, dozens
of immigrants from Mexico or other countries are arrested
each day and are forced to wear fetters like suspects.
The practice of treating illegal immigrants like criminals
has become a national trend. The limit in the definition
of terrorists and illegal immigrants has become very blurry.
V. On The Rights of Women and Children
The situation of American women and children
was disturbing. The rates of women and children physically
or sexually victimized were high. According to FBI Crime
Statistics, in 2003 the United States witnessed 93,233
cases of raping. Virtually 63.2 in every 100,000 women
fell victims. The statistics also showed that every two
minutes one woman was sexually assaulted and every six
minutes one woman was raped.
The number of women abused and
treated at First Aid Centers exceeded one million every
year. More than 1,500 women in the United States were
killed every year by their husbands, lovers or roommates
(The Milenio, Mexico, Sept. 26, 2004). Nearly 78 percent
of American women were physically victimized at least
once in their lifetime. And 79 percent of the women were
sexually abused at least once. A survey released in November
2004 by the US National Institute of Justice showed by
the time they concluded four years of college education,
88 percent of the women had experiences of physical or
sexual victimization and 64 percent of them experienced
both. In the past decade, charges handled by the US Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission against sexual harassment
on women surged 22 percent (The Sun, Jul. 16, 2004).
Sex crimes in the US military were on the rise. According
to the Washington Post (Jun. 3, 2004), from 1999 to 2002
the number of lawsuits against sexual crimes in the US
army that were formally filed grew from 658 to 783, up
19 percent. And the number of rape cases went up from
356 to 445, up 25 percent. The number of such cases rose
equally 5 percent between 2002 and 2003. The British Guardian
reported on Oct. 25, 2004 that by the end of September
2004 the Miles Foundation had dealt with 242 cases filed
between September 2002 and August 2003 about US woman
soldiers being raped or sexually harassed in Iraq, Kuwait,
Bahrain or Afghanistan. In addition, there were 431 cases
of US women soldiers being sexually harassed at other
military bases.
Women's labor and social rights
were violated. According to The Sun newspaper (Jul. 16,
2004), the charges handled by the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission on sexual discrimination against women grew
12 percent in the past decade. In 2004 two cases
drew wide attention. They were a bias class lawsuit involving
1.6 million women employees at Wal-Mart and another case
involving 340 women staffers of Morgan Stanley (New York
Times, Jul. 13, 2004).
Men and women on the same job were not
paid the same. Statistics released by the US Labor Department
in Jan. 2004 showed a woman who worked full time had the
median earning of 81.1 percent of that for a man. The
Chicago Tribune said on Aug. 27, 2004 that the rate of
women in poverty went up fast, to 12.4 percent of the
entire female population.
The health care for American women was
at a low level. The US Family Medical Leave Act guarantees
12 weeks of unpaid leave for childbirth to about half
of all mothers and nothing for the rest. A study of 168
countries conducted by the Harvard School of Public Health
indicated that US workers have fewer rights to time off
for family matters than workers in most other countries,
and rank near the bottom in pregnancy and sick leave.
"The United States trails enormously far behind the
rest of the world when it comes to legislation to protect
the health and welfare of working families," said
Jody Heymann, a Harvard associate professor who led the
study. (AP Boston, Jun. 17, 2004)
Child poverty was a serious problem.
The Chicago Tribune reported on Aug. 27, 2004 that the
number of children in poverty climbed from 12.1 million
in 2002 to 12.9 million in 2003, a year-on-year increase
of 0.9 percent. About 20 million children lived in "low-income
working families" -- with barely enough money to
cover basic needs (AP Washington, Oct. 12, 2004). In California,
one in every six children did not have medical insurance.
The Los Angeles Times said on May 6, 2004 that in the
metropolitan area the number of homeless children found
wondering on the streets at nights numbered 8,000, which
had stretched the 2,500-bed government-run emergency shelter
system well beyond capacity. Poverty deprived many children
the opportunity to obtain higher education. In the 146
renowned institutions of higher learning, only 3 percent
of the students came from the low-income class, while
74 percent of them were from the high-income class.
Children were victims of sex crimes.
Every year about 400,000 children in the US were forced
to engage in prostitution or other sexual dealings on
the streets. Home-deserting or homeless children were
the most likely to fall victims of sexual abuse. Reports
on children sexually exploited, which were received by
the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children,
soared from 4,573 cases in 1998 to 81,987 cases in 2003
(The USA Today, Feb. 27,2004).
In recent years scandals about clergymen molesting children
kept breaking out. According to a study commissioned by
the American Catholic Bishops, in 2004 a total of 756
catholic priests and lay employees were charged with child
sexual harassment. It is believed that from 1950 to 2002
more than 10,600 boys and girls were sexually abused by
nearly 4,400 clergymen (AFP, Feb. 17, 2005). Moreover,
every year over 4.5 million kids in the United States
were molested in kindergartens and schools, which amounted
to one in every ten (AP, Jul. 14, 2004).
Violent crimes occurred frequently. Studies show nearly
20 percent of US juveniles lived in families that possessed
guns. In Washington D.C. 24 people younger than 18 were
killed in 2004, twice as many as in 2003 (The Washington
Post, Jan. 1, 2005). In Baltimore, 29 juveniles were killed
from Jan. 1 to Sept. 27 in 2004. In 2003 35 were killed
(The Washington Post, Sept. 28, 2004).
A report released by the US Justice Department
on November 29, 2004 said about 9 percent of school kids
aged 9 to 12 admitted being threatened with injury or
having suffered an injury from a weapon while at school
in 2003.
More and more schoolers were reluctant to go to school
because of security concerns. Child abuses and neglects
were widely reported in the United States. The Sun newspaper
reported on May 18, 2004 that in 2002, a total of 900,000
children in the United States were abused, of whom nearly
1,400 died.
Every year, 1.98 out of every 100,000 American children
were killed by their parents or guardians. In Maryland,
the rate was as high as 2.4 per 100,000. (Md Child Abuse
Deaths Exceed National Average, The Sun, May 18, 2004).
The Houston Chronicle newspaper reported on Oct. 2, 2004
that in Texas, each staff of local government departments
responsible for protecting children's rights handled 50
child abuse cases every month.
Two thirds of juvenile detention facilities in the United
States lock up mentally ill youth; every day, about 2,000
youth were incarcerated simply because community mental
health services were unavailable. In 33 states, juvenile
detention centers held youth with mental illness without
any specific charges against them (link).
The USA Today reported on July 8, 2004 that between Jan.
1 and June 30 of 2003, 15,000 youth detained in US youth
detention centers were awaiting mental health services,
while children at the age of 10 or younger were locked
up in 117 youth detention centers. The detention centers
totally ignored human rights and personal safety with
excessive use of drugs and force, and failed to take care
of inmates with mental problems in a proper way. They
even locked up prisoners in cages. There were reports
about scandals involving correctional authorities in California,
where two juvenile inmates hanged themselves after they
were badly beaten by jail police (San Jose Mercury News
and Singtao Daily, March 18, 2004).
VI. On the Infringement of Human Rights
of Foreign Nationals
In 2004, US army service people
were reported to have abused and insulted Iraqi POWs,
which stunned the whole world. The US forces were
blamed for their fierce and dirty treatments for these
Iraqi POWs. They made the POWs naked by force, masking
their heads with underwear (even women's underwear), locking
up their necks with a belt, towing them over the ground,
letting military dogs bite them, beating them with a whip,
shocking them with electric batons, needling them sometimes,
and putting chemical fluids containing phosphorus on their
wounds. They even forced some of the these POWs to play
"human-body pyramid" while staying naked, in
the presence of US soldiers who were standing on the roof
and mocking at them. They sometimes sodomized these POWs
with lamp pipes and brooms. Some Iraqi civilians were
also fiercely abused.
The newspaper Pyramid pointed out that the true face
of Americans was exposed through this incident. A spokesman
of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
said, sarcastically, that the US has made the whole world
see what the hell a democratic, law-ruled nation is.
According to US media like the Newsweek and the Washington
Post, as early as several years ago, in US forces' prisons
in Afghanistan, interrogators used various kinds of torture
tools for acquiring confession, causing many deaths.
British newspaper The Observer reported on March 14,
2004 that according to a report by the ICRC, US soldiers
had formed a kind of mode for arresting people even before
the Iraq war. "Torture is part
of the process."
Over 100 former Iraqi high-ranking government and military
officials were put under special custody by the US military.
They stayed 23 hours a day in dark, small and tightly
closed concrete-made wards, where they were allowed to
leave the wards twice a day, with 20 minutes available
for taking a bath or going to the toilet.
On Nov. 26, Iraqi Lieutenant General Abid Hamid Mahmud
al-Tikriti was put in a sleeping bag by force and died
after he was physically tortured during an interrogation.
According to a latest report by AP, on Feb. 18, 2005,
in November 2003, CIA people hanged dead one of the so-called
"ghost" prisoner in the Abu Ghraib Prison by
fierce means, with his two hands cuffed behind his back.
When he was released with shackles and lowered, blood
gushed from his mouth "as if a faucet had been turned
on."
Among the 94 abuse cases confirmed and published by the
Office of the US Inspector General for the Filed Army,
39 people were killed, 20 of these cases were confirmed
as murder. There were also severe child abuses conducted
by the US forces.
At least 107 children were imprisoned
in seven prisons including the Abu Ghraib Prison run by
the US forces in Afghanistan. They were not allowed to
get in contact with their families. Their term in prison
was undetermined. It was not clear when they were going
to be brought court hearing. Some of these children had
been abused. One low-ranking US officer who had
served in the Abu Ghraib Prison testified that US soldiers
abused some of these children in custody, and they had
even assaulted young girls sexually.
What's more fierce is that US soldiers used military
dogs to frighten these juvenile prisoners to see whose
dog could scare them to lose control on excretion. US
forces had violated the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
Relations, by detaining two Palestinian diplomats to Iraq
in a prison ward of the Abu Ghraib Prison, together with
90 other men. They spent one year in the prison, suffering
from very poor living conditions.
The ICRC believed that abuse of detained Iraqis in the
notorious Abu Ghraib Prison was not a single case. It
was a systematic behavior. According to some White House
documents that were made public on June 22, 2004, the
Department of Defense approved to use harsh means to interrogate
prisoners in Guantanamo, Cuba.
The US Secretary of Defense said in the public that the
Geneva Convention does not mean that all the detainees,
especially those who were so-called "non-fighting
personnel", should be treated as a POW. A draft memorandum
of the Department of Defense also claimed that US laws
and international conventions, including the Geneva Convention,
which strictly ban the use of torture, do not apply to
US President as the General Commander of the US Army.
A memorandum of the US Department of Justice makes it
even more clearly that the United States could use international
laws to measure other countries on the issue of the treatment
of POWs, while it is not necessary for Washington to abide
by these laws. The interrogators were trained to find
ways to torture prisoners, physically, while they should
exceed the Geneva Convention, technically.
Media found that the US soldiers' behaviors in humiliating
Iraqi prisoners as showed photos were typically what they
were trained for. US Brigadier General Yanis Karpinski
told the press that her boss once said to her that "prisoners
are dogs." If they were made to think that they were
a bit better than dogs, they could get out of control.
Meanwhile, the US government has
tried for the third successive year to extend the term
of a resolution of the UN Security Council that soldiers
could be exempted of lawsuit by the International Criminal
Court, even if they break the relevant rules. In
view of prisoner abuses in Iraq, this has been strongly
criticized by the UN General Secretary (Reuters' story
on June 17,2004).
Former US President Jimmy Carter also criticized that
the US policies formulated by the high-ranking officials
are a kind of retrogression, which has damaged the principles
of democracy and rule of law and lacked respect for fundamental
human rights.
To avoid international scrutiny, the
United States keeps under wraps half of its 20-odd detention
centers worldwide which are holding terrorist suspects.
And at least seven US-controlled clandestine prisons,
one of which dubbed "inferno," in Afghanistan,
have not been kept within the bounds of law. (Prensa Latina,
Aug. 16, 2004)
In a report by the Human Rights First on 24 US secret
interrogation centers, these secret facilities are believed
to "make inappropriate detention and abuse not only
likely but virtually inevitable." (British newspaper
the Times, Sept. 11, 2004)
Moreover, an executive jet is being
used by the American intelligence agencies to fly terrorist
suspects to other countries, in a bid to use torture and
evade American laws. The plane is leased by the
US Defense Department and the CIA from a private company
in Massachusetts. Being accused of making so-called "torture
flights," the jet has conducted more than 300 flights
and has flown to 49 destinations outside the United States,
including the Guantanamo Bay prison camp in Cuba. The
suspects are frequently bound, gagged and sedated before
being put on board the plane (British newspaper the Times,
Nov. 14, 2004). The United States has secretly shifted
thousands of captives worldwide in the past three years,
most of whom were not indicted officially.
The United States is the No. 1 military
power in the world, and its military spending has kept
shooting up. Its fiscal 2005 defense budget hit a historical
high of 422 billion US dollars, an increase of 21 billion
dollars over fiscal 2004. As the biggest arms dealer in
the world, the United States has made a fortune out of
war. Its transactions of conventional weapons exceeded
14.5 billion dollars in 2003, up 900 million dollars year-on-year
and accounting for 56.7 percent of the total sales worldwide.
The Iraq War has been "a helping straw" to the
US economic development.
The United States frequently commits wanton slaughters
during external invasions and military attacks. Spain's
Uprising newspaper on May, 12, 2004 published a list of
human rights infringement incidents committed by the US
troops, quoting two bloodthirsty sayings of two American
generals, "The only good Indians I ever saw were
dead" by General Philip Sheridan and "we should
bomb Vietnam back to the stone age" by air force
general Curtis LeMay. We can still smell a similar bloodiness
in the Iraq War waged by the United States.
Statistics from the health department of the interim
Iraqi government show 3,487 people, including 328 women
and children, have been killed and another 13,720 injured
in 15 of Iraq's 18 provinces between April 15 and Sept.
19 in 2004.
A survey on Iraqi civilian deaths, based on the natural
death rate before the war, estimates that the US-led invasion
might have led to 100,000 more deaths in the country,
with most victims being women and children.
Jointly designed and conducted by researchers at Johns
Hopkins University, Columbia University and the Al-Mustansiriya
University in Baghdad, the survey also finds that the
majority of the additional, unnatural deaths since the
invasion were caused by violence, while air strikes from
the coalition forces were the main factor to blame for
the violence-caused deaths. (Associated Press, Oct. 28,
2004)
On Jan. 3, 2004, four US soldiers stationed in Iraq pushed
two Iraqi civilians into the Tigris River, making one
of them drowned.
On May 19, 2004, an American helicopter fired on a wedding
party in a remote Iraqi village close to the Syrian border,
killing 45 people, including 15 children and 10 women.
On Nov. 20, 2004, seven people were killed in Ramadi in
the Anbar province when US troops opened fire on a civilian
bus.
According to a Staff Sergeant in the US Marines, his
platoon killed 30 civilians in six weeks. And he has witnessed
the blasphemy and gradual rotting of many corpses, and
a lot of wounded civilians were deserted without any medical
treatment. (British newspaper The Independent, May 23,
2004)
In addition, the US troops often plunder Iraqi households
when tracking down anti-US militants since the invasion.
The American forces has so far committed at least thousands
of robberies and 90 percent of the Iraqis that have been
rummaged are innocent.
The United States has been hindering the work of the
United Nation's human rights mechanism. And it either
took no notice of or used delaying tactics on the requests
of relevant UN agencies to visit its Guantanamo Bay prison
camp in Cuba.
Some justice-upholding developing countries introduced
draft resolutions on America's democracy and human rights
situation to the 59th UN General Assembly, to show their
strong concern over the US human rights infringement,
prisoner abuse, media control, and loopholes in its election
system.
It is the common goal and obligation for all countries
in the world to promote and safeguard human rights. No
country in the world can claim itself as perfect and has
no room for improvement in the human rights area. And
no country should exclude itself from the international
human rights development process, or view itself as the
incarnation of human rights which can reign over other
countries and give orders to the others. Even the United
States shall be no exception.
Despite tons of problems in its own
human rights, the United States continues to stick to
its belligerent stance, wantonly trample on the sovereignty
of other countries, and constantly stage tragedies of
human rights infringement in the world.
Instead of indulging itself in publishing
the "human rights country report" to censure
other countries unreasonably, the United States should
reflect on its erroneous behavior on human rights and
take its own human rights problems seriously. The double
standards of the United States on human rights and its
exercise of hegemonism and power politics under the pretext
of promoting human rights will certainly put itself in
an isolated and passive position and beget opposition
from all just members of the international community.
|
No concept lies more firmly embedded
in our national character than the notion that the USA
is "No. 1," "the greatest." Our
broadcast media are, in essence, continuous advertisements
for the brand name "America Is No. 1." Any
office seeker saying otherwise would be committing political
suicide. In fact, anyone saying otherwise will be labeled
"un-American." We're an "empire,"
ain't we? Sure we are. An empire without a manufacturing
base. An empire that must borrow $2 billion a day from
its competitors in order to function. Yet the delusion
is ineradicable. We're No. 1. Well...this is the country
you really live in:
The United States is 49th in the world in literacy
(the New York Times, Dec. 12, 2004).
The United States ranked 28th out of 40 countries
in mathematical literacy (NYT, Dec. 12, 2004).
Twenty percent of Americans think the sun orbits the
earth. Seventeen percent believe the earth revolves
around the sun once a day (The Week, Jan. 7, 2005).
"The International Adult Literacy Survey...found
that Americans with less than nine years of education
'score worse than virtually all of the other countries'"
(Jeremy Rifkin's superbly documented book The European
Dream: How Europe's Vision of the Future Is Quietly
Eclipsing the American Dream, p.78).
Our workers are so ignorant and lack so many basic
skills that American businesses spend $30 billion a
year on remedial training (NYT, Dec. 12, 2004). No wonder
they relocate elsewhere!
"The European Union leads the U.S. in...the number
of science and engineering graduates; public research
and development (R&D) expenditures; and new capital
raised" (The European Dream, p.70).
"Europe surpassed the United States in the mid-1990s
as the largest producer of scientific literature"
(The European Dream, p.70).
Nevertheless, Congress cut funds to the National Science
Foundation. The agency will issue 1,000 fewer research
grants this year (NYT, Dec. 21, 2004).
Foreign applications to U.S. grad schools declined
28 percent last year. Foreign student enrollment on
all levels fell for the first time in three decades,
but increased greatly in Europe and China. Last year
Chinese grad-school graduates in the U.S. dropped 56
percent, Indians 51 percent, South Koreans 28 percent
(NYT, Dec. 21, 2004). We're not the place to be anymore.
The World Health Organization "ranked the countries
of the world in terms of overall health performance,
and the U.S. [was]...37th." In the fairness of
health care, we're 54th. "The irony is that the
United States spends more per capita for health care
than any other nation in the world" (The European
Dream, pp.79-80). Pay more, get lots, lots less.
"The U.S. and South Africa are the only two developed
countries in the world that do not provide health care
for all their citizens" (The European Dream, p.80).
Excuse me, but since when is South Africa a "developed"
country? Anyway, that's the company we're keeping.
Lack of health insurance coverage causes 18,000 unnecessary
American deaths a year. (That's six times the number
of people killed on 9/11.) (NYT, Jan. 12, 2005.)
"U.S. childhood poverty now ranks 22nd, or second
to last, among the developed nations. Only Mexico scores
lower" (The European Dream, p.81). Been to Mexico
lately? Does it look "developed" to you? Yet
it's the only "developed" country to score
lower in childhood poverty.
Twelve million American families--more than 10 percent
of all U.S. households--"continue to struggle,
and not always successfully, to feed themselves."
Families that "had members who actually went hungry
at some point last year" numbered 3.9 million (NYT,
Nov. 22, 2004).
The United States is 41st in the world in infant mortality.
Cuba scores higher (NYT, Jan. 12, 2005).
Women are 70 percent more likely to die in childbirth
in America than in Europe (NYT, Jan. 12, 2005).
The leading cause of death of pregnant women in this
country is murder (CNN, Dec. 14, 2004).
"Of the 20 most developed countries in the world,
the U.S. was dead last in the growth rate of total compensation
to its workforce in the 1980s.... In the 1990s, the
U.S. average compensation growth rate grew only slightly,
at an annual rate of about 0.1 percent" (The European
Dream, p.39). Yet Americans work longer hours per year
than any other industrialized country, and get less
vacation time.
"Sixty-one of the 140 biggest companies on the
Global Fortune 500 rankings are European, while only
50 are U.S. companies" (The European Dream, p.66).
"In a recent survey of the world's 50 best companies,
conducted by Global Finance, all but one were European"
(The European Dream, p.69).
"Fourteen of the 20 largest commercial banks in
the world today are European.... In the chemical industry,
the European company BASF is the world's leader, and
three of the top six players are European. In engineering
and construction, three of the top five companies are
European.... The two others are Japanese. Not a single
American engineering and construction company is included
among the world's top nine competitors. In food and
consumer products, Nestlé and Unilever, two European
giants, rank first and second, respectively, in the
world. In the food and drugstore retail trade, two European
companies...are first and second, and European companies
make up five of the top ten. Only four U.S. companies
are on the list" (The European Dream, p.68).
The United States has lost 1.3 million jobs to China
in the last decade (CNN, Jan. 12, 2005).
U.S. employers eliminated 1 million jobs in 2004 (The
Week, Jan. 14, 2005).
Three million six hundred thousand Americans ran out
of unemployment insurance last year; 1.8 million--one
in five--unemployed workers are jobless for more than
six months (NYT, Jan. 9, 2005).
Japan, China, Taiwan, and South Korea hold 40 percent
of our government debt. (That's why we talk nice to
them.) "By helping keep mortgage rates from rising,
China has come to play an enormous and little-noticed
role in sustaining the American housing boom" (NYT,
Dec. 4, 2004). Read that twice. We owe our housing boom
to China, because they want us to keep buying all that
stuff they manufacture.
Sometime in the next 10 years Brazil will probably
pass the U.S. as the world's largest agricultural producer.
Brazil is now the world's largest exporter of chickens,
orange juice, sugar, coffee, and tobacco. Last year,
Brazil passed the U.S. as the world's largest beef producer.
(Hear that, you poor deluded cowboys?) As a result,
while we bear record trade deficits, Brazil boasts a
$30 billion trade surplus (NYT, Dec. 12, 2004).
As of last June, the U.S. imported more food than
it exported (NYT, Dec. 12, 2004).
Bush: 62,027,582 votes. Kerry: 59,026,003 votes. Number
of eligible voters who didn't show up: 79,279,000 (NYT,
Dec. 26, 2004). That's more than a third. Way more.
If more than a third of Iraqis don't show for their
election, no country in the world will think that election
legitimate.
Forty-three percent of Americans think torture is
sometimes justified, according to a PEW Poll (Associated
Press, Aug. 19, 2004).
"Nearly 900,000 children were abused or neglected
in 2002, the last year for which such data are available"
(USA Today, Dec. 21, 2004).
"The International Association of Chiefs of Police
said that cuts by the [Bush] administration in federal
aid to local police agencies have left the nation more
vulnerable than ever" (USA Today, Nov. 17, 2004).
No. 1? In most important categories we're not even
in the Top 10 anymore. Not even close.
The USA is "No. 1" in nothing but weaponry,
consumer spending, debt, and delusion. |
Reports of unexplained police
shootings continue to surface. Even the main stream
media can not ignore it. People are asking: Are the
police out of control?
[warning this report
contains graphic video of police machine gunning a person
to death] |
The US military is developing a
weapon that delivers a bout of excruciating pain from
afar to use against protesters and rioters.
Documents released under the US Freedom of Information
Act show that scientists have received funding to investigate
how much pain can be induced in individuals hit by electromagnetic
pulses created by lasers without killing them.
Due to be ready for use in 2007, the Pulsed Energy
Projectile weapon is designed to trigger extreme pain
from a distance of one-and-a-quarter miles.
It fires a laser pulse that generates a burst of expanding
plasma - electrically charged gas - when it hits something
solid. Tests on animals showed it produced "pain
and temporary paralysis".
Pain researchers told today's New Scientist magazine
that the technology could end up being used for torture
and that it was unethical.
Andrew Rice, a consultant in pain medicine in London,
said: "I am deeply concerned about the ethical
aspects of this research." |
Why have the 'traditional family
values' folks erected a wall of silence around the Gannon
scandal?
They were livid over SpongeBob
Square Pants' participation in a video advocating tolerance,
and fuming about Buster the Bunny's visit to a lesbian
household. So where's the outrage from the Christian
right over the Jeff Gannon Affair? Despite a
chunk of time having passed since the Gannon Affair
was first uncovered, Christian right organizations are
still cloaked in silence. As of February 24, there wasn't
any news about the Gannon Affair available on the Web
sites of Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council,
the American Family Association, or the Traditional
Values Coalition. As best as I could determine, no special
alerts about the Gannon Affair have been issued; and
no campaigns have been launched to get to the bottom
of the matter.
Curious about this wall of silence, I phoned several
Christian right groups on Tuesday, February 22, hoping
to find someone who could comment on the Gannon Affair.
This is what I found:
Dr. James Dobson's Focus on the Family: I filled out
an interview form and waited to hear back. Several hours
later, a FotF administrative assistant called me to
say that no one there could answer my questions about
Gannon. She said a lot of folks were out sick and no
one was available. "Would someone be available
tomorrow or Thursday," I asked. She pointed out
that no one would be available the following day or
the day after to talk about this issue. "Next week?"
"No."
* The Family Research Council: I spoke with Amber
Hildebrand, FRC's Media Director. She said "We
haven't made any public comments about this. There have
been other pressing issues that have taken precedent,
although this came as a shock to FRC." Hildebrand
said she would see if FRC's Vice President of Government
Affairs Connie Mackey, would talk with me. At press
time (Thursday evening) Mackey has not called.
* The Traditional Values Coalition: I filled out an
interview form and waited for a call back. As of 2.22,
TVC Action Alerts are focused on the persecution and
subsequent dismissal of charges against the "Philadelphia
5," a group of fundamentalists that disrupted a
pro-gay activity in Philadelphia in order to preach
"the Gospel to homosexuals," and on Columbia
House for developing "a new subsidiary called Hush
to market pornographic materials in association with
Playboy and other pornography companies." At press
time no one had returned my call. After making a second
call, a TVC spokesperson told me that "no one is
available to speak on that topic right now."
* The Free Congress Foundation: Over at Paul Weyrich's
Washington, DC-based organization, Jill Farrell, the
Director of Communications told me that she hadn't "heard
anyone say anything at all" about the Gannon Affair.
The editors at Town Hall, the Heritage Foundation's
one stop shopping center for conservative ideas, and
the Rev. Donald Wildmon's American Family Association,
currently involved in trashing HBO's Bill Maher over
recent remarks he made about religion, didn't return
my calls. Charisma News Service and the Christian Response
Network didn't respond to my email questions about their
lack of coverage of the Gannon Affair.
That was then...
While waiting for callbacks, my minds eye drifted
back to the Clinton White House. Tim Bannon, a liberal
activist, had made his way into a presidential press
conference; Bannon had been attending press briefings
for nearly two years, under the name Slim Cannon. No
one seemed knew much about FallOnNews.com, the Internet
news service he worked with, but many suspected it was
a front group for the Democrats.
Clinton had been taking a well-publicized beating
over the Monica Lewinsky Affair. At the president's
first press conference in quite some time, he called
on Cannon, who asked the following question: "Mr.
President, given revelations about House Speaker Newt
Gingrich's serial affairs and the abandonment of his
wife when she had cancer, and given that Congressman
Bob Livingston has a similar record of perfidious peccadilloes,
and given stories about the sexual shenanigans of a
host of televangelists including Jim Bakker and Jimmy
Swaggart, could you please comment on whether the right
wing media, isn't selectively focusing on the Lewinsky
Affair, and doesn't want to deal with sexual scandals
in its own backyard?"
Less than twenty-four hours later, a host of right
wing Web sites -- suspicious that Cannon may have been
planted by the White House -- discovered that Slim Cannon's
cannon was prominently featured on a number of gay porn
sites, and that in his off hours he may have been a
gay "escort." Intrepid researchers find out
that Cannon had been privy to secret documents before
any other duly accredited White House reporters.
"Clinton's gay consort" became the right's
theme for the next several months.
Reality-based fans will recognize that the above scenario
never happened. If a Tim Bannon, as Slim Cannon, had
insinuated himself into the White House on President
Clinton's watch, and lobbed softball question after
softball question, all hell would have broken loose.
Right wing media, and the pulpits and newsletters of
fundamentalist Christians, would have been ranting and
raving: "Where's the outrage?" Bob Dole's
mantra from his failed 1996 presidential campaign might
actually have finally resonated. The mainstream media
would have no doubt jumped on board.
This is now...
What has actually happened bears some resemblance
to our fictitious scenario. The major difference is
that the scandal involving Jeff Gannon, whose real name
is James D. Guckert, is happening on President George
W. Bush's watch. The vituperative voices of the right
are quiet and their voracious appetites for sex, slime
and salacious details about Democratic dalliances have
disappeared since it's a GOP scandal.
On the heels of the payola scandal involving Bush
Administration payoffs to Armstrong Williams, Maggie
Gallagher and McManus -- a loose coalition of the shilling
-- along comes the Gannon/Guckert affair.
James D. Guckert, as Gannon, represented a conservative
news site called Talon News. Somehow, within a short
time of his entering "journalism," Gannon
was able to get credentialed and attend numerous White
House briefings and lob softballs at White House officials.
According to DemocraticUnderground.com, "Gannon
was actually in the White House as early as February
28, 2003 -- a month before Talon News even existed.
Gannon also got called on by President Bush at one of
his rare news conferences. Gannon ended his question
with "How are you going to work with people who
seem to have divorced themselves from reality?"
referring to Senator Hillary Clinton and Senate Minority
Leader Harry Reid.
Details of the Gannon/Guckert affair are still being
uncovered. Thanks to the blogosphere and largely through
the efforts of Media Matters for America and John Aravosis'
Americablog we are learning more than we ever wanted
to know about someone we rather no little about. These
blogs, and a handful of other enterprising bloggers,
blew the lid off Gannon's shameful charade. Beneath
the lid was James D. Guckert in pre-fig leaf Garden
of Eden splendor: As a contributor to such sites as
Hotmilitarystud.com, Workingboys.net, Militaryescorts.com,
MilitaryescortsM4M.com and Meetlocalmen.com, Gannon's
cannon is on full display.
"'Jeff' has now quit Talon News," writes
Frank Rich in the February 20 edition of the New York
Times, "not because he and it have been exposed
as fakes but because of other embarrassing blogosphere
revelations linking him to sites like hotmilitarystud.com
and to an apparently promising career as an X-rated
$200-per-hour "escort." (For more on all of
this including links to some of Gannon/Guckert's Web
sites, see Americablog.)
There are innumerable aspects of the Gannon/Guckert
Affair that should keep curious mainstream reporters
busy for quite some time: how did Gannon/Guckert get
into all those White House press briefings and the President's
press conference?; Was he on the payroll of Team Bush?;
Did he play a role revealing Valerie Plame's CIA employment?
-- the investigation is ongoing; how did he get by with
being a phony right wing reporter by day and a gay prostitute
by night?
A few weeks back, Buzzflash.com editorialized: "The
Gannon story touches upon everything from manufactured
news to manufactured 'reporters' to the Valerie Plame
affair to websites that have a connection to the White
House, but appear independent, to a Bush Cartel hypocrisy
about gays, to payola, to scripted Bush news conferences,
to who knows what. This is a BIG media story that should
be on the cover of the New York Times and Post."
Unable to speak with representatives from Focus on
the Family, the Family Research Council and the Traditional
Values Coalition, I turned to Joe Conn of American United
for Separation of Church and State and John Aravosis,
the creator of Americablog.
In a telephone interview, Conn said he wasn't surprised
that there hasn't been any response from Christian right
organizations because "The religious right is pretty
much a team player when it comes to the Bush Administration.
Unless it's an issue like same-sex marriage -- a core
issue of their agenda -- they will give the president
a pass."
"Clearly this is an example of the religious
right's hypocrisy," Conn point out. "If it
was Bill Clinton they would be in total uproar."
Via e-mail, I asked Aravosis why he thought the Christian
right was being silent about the Gannon Affair.
"Because they're hypocrites,"
he wrote in an e-mail. "They know this scandal
is hurting Bush and they put politics ahead of their
God. That's how petty and un-Christian they are." |
It might not have the majesty of
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, or the viciousness of
his attacks on the American dream. But the last written
word of Hunter S Thompson, who died last week, has left
the literary world intrigued.
According to a sheriff's report, the author's body
was found in a chair by his kitchen table, on which
a typewriter had been placed and a page of writing paper
had been lined up with the word "counselor"
(sic) typed at its centre.
A fierce social critic, satirist, and anti-war activist,
Thompson, 67, killed himself with a shot from a pistol
at home in Aspen, Colorado.
The police report describes how his son, Juan Thompson,
walked outside the house after discovering the body
and fired three shotgun blasts into the air, later saying
he had done it to "mark the passing of his father".
The significance of the writer's last word was unclear
yesterday. It could have been the beginning of a letter
addressed to a lawyer (one of the American uses of the
word counsellor, along with therapist or adviser), he
may have been describing himself, or he might simply
have wished to confound those looking for neat explanations
for his suicide - an echo of Rosebud, the central character's
last word in the film Citizen Kane.
One possible clue is the paper it was written on -
headed stationery of the Fourth Amendment Foundation,
an organisation he had just set up to defend privacy
rights against the threat of unwarranted search and
seizure by the authorities.
In one of his last interviews, Thompson said: "There
has to be some defence against having this government
in vain, seize, take over, invade our lives and our
personal privacy... every day." Thompson's friends
said he was in despair over the state of civil liberties
and President George Bush's re-election in November.
His family cancelled plans for a public funeral in
favour of a private ceremony, but there are still plans
to blast Thompson's ashes from a cannon, apparently
one of his final wishes. |
I covered Rep. Sam Johnson [R-Texas]
when he first ran for Congress in 1991. He was so "honest"
that he didn't even live in the district - he just rented
an apartment in the district to run.
That was technically legal, but many raised questions
about him using a loophole to run. I was one of the
few reporters to write about that at the time, but it
didn't stop Johnson from winning the election.
Now, Johnson wants to kill everyone
in Syria in one nuclear swoop, just because he has some
unproven notion that weapons of mass destruction are
being hidden there. That would include the relatives
of my kids - who are part Syrian. Not to mention, the
nuke would probably take out much of the Middle East,
including Israel. And it would affect weather patterns
and cause cancer in surrounding areas for years, if
not decades.
His chief of staff says Johnson doesn't really want
to nuke Syria, but I don't buy that. He has said this
at least twice, including to a public gathering in a
speech in a church, no less, on Feb. 19, and privately
to Bush himself at the White House. Remember what Bush
once tried to say: "Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame won't get fooled again."
What's also sad is that many in the audience at the
church applauded right after Johnson said he wants to
nuke Syria. In fact, "the crowd roared with applause,"
according to a report in the non-partisan Roll Call
publication that covers Capitol Hill.
Here is the item with more details from Roll Call:
Now we know where Rep. Sam Johnson (R-Texas) thinks
the weapons of mass destruction are buried: in Syria,
which he said he'd like to nuke to smithereens.
Speaking at a veterans' celebration at Suncreek United
Methodist Church in Allen, Texas, on Feb. 19, Johnson
told the crowd that he explained his theory to President
Bush and Rep. Kay Granger (R-Texas) on the porch of
the White House one night. Johnson said he told the
president that night, "Syria is the problem. Syria
is where those weapons of mass destruction are, in my
view. You know, I can fly an F-15, put two nukes on
'em and I'll make one pass. We won't have to worry about
Syria anymore."
The crowd roared with applause.
Johnson's remarks were captured on tape, which was
played over the phone for [Heard on the Hill]. While
the audience audibly applauded Johnson's remarks, a
few members of the crowd did not. One person who lives
in the district and who attended the service said he
was "shocked and offended" by the Congressman's
remarks. [...]
Johnson, a member of Congress with
great power who is invited to semi-private functions
with Bush in the White House, at least twice called
for murdering hundreds of thousands, if not millions,
of innocent people just because he THINKS that country
MIGHT be hiding those weapons of mass destruction that
our leaders LIED about to cajole us into a stupid invasion
of Iraq.
When I sent out Johnson's "nuke Syria" statement
to various friends, family members, media outlets and
more, one conservative family member wrote back, accusing
me of being "biased" against Republicans.
That's as if he was not biased against Democrats when
he mostly got his news by reading Free Nazi Republic,
a site that won't allow Americans like me to present
a different viewpoint. I wrote back saying I admitted
to being biased against fascist nazi right-wingers who
are turning this country into the nazi Germany of the
modern era. And I won't stop being biased against them
because I think they are dangerous and so wrong that
the only thing true patriotic Americans can do is oppose
them. [...]
My conservative family member ended by saying he was
"sure that any well-educated person would not want
to 'nuke' any body."
My response: "And when
you mention well-educated people not wanting to 'nuke'
anybody, you overlook how we did just that in 1945.
And we are supposedly educated in this country, though
that is debatable." |
WASHINGTON -- Democratic Sen. Hillary
Rodham Clinton called Tuesday for tougher punishment
against Syria, saying the country was aggressively supporting
terrorism in the "dangerous neighborhood"
of the Middle East.
In lambasting Syria, Clinton joined a growing chorus
of officials in Washington urging the United States
to take a harsher stance against that country following
a Feb. 14 bombing in Beirut that killed the former premier
of Lebanon.
Speaking to the Jewish Council
for Public Affairs, Clinton branded Syria and
Iran bad neighbors bent on upsetting the fragile balance
in the region.
"It is not only a dangerous
neighborhood, but a neighborhood in which very few of
the neighbors are committed to what Prime Minister (Ariel)
Sharon is doing or what we hope to come from
the Palestinian leadership," said Clinton.
Iran and Syria "pose such great threats not only
to peace and stability, but in Iran's case the potential
for nuclear capacity, and in Syria's case, with the
continuation of the support for terrorism that flows
from Damascus," she said. [...]
"It will be interesting to see
what happens inside Syria. ... In this day and age it's
hard to be a ruthless dictator," said McConnell.
Syria has come under intense worldwide scrutiny since
the bombing that killed former Lebanese premier Rafik
Hariri and 16 others.
Assad, in an interview published
Monday in an Italian newspaper, denied any involvement,
saying such a role would spell "political suicide."
[...] |
Iranian commander says his country
will hand US, Israel bone-breaking blows if Tehran attacked.
TEHRAN - The head of Iran's powerful Revolutionary
Guards has warned that 190,000 US troops stationed close
to the Islamic republic could be targetted if Iran were
attacked, a report said Wednesday.
"More than 190,000 members of American forces
are scattered in Afghanistan and Iraq. If the US carries
out its threats against Iran, they must know that all
these forces will be within our reach," Yahya Rahim
Safavi told the ultra-hardline Ya Lessarat newspaper.
"The US and the Zionist regime (Israel) do not
have the power to confront us and we will hand them
bone-breaking blows," Safavi said, adding that
"Iraq is getting more unsafe everyday for America"
anyway.
He also warned that if "the Zionist regime had
a satanic thought and attacked Iran, we would not leave
one point safe in the entire Zionist territory".
The United States and Israel both accuse Iran of seeking
to develop nuclear weapons, and have not ruled out military
options to prevent the clerical regime of acquiring
the bom |
Tehran, March 2 - The Zionist
regime is the prime suspect behind the assassination
of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq al-Hariri, said
an Iranian expert in the Middle East affairs.
Asadollahi told IRIB, modern terrorist methods and
new explosives applied in the assassination attempt
proved it have likely been done by terrorist teams of
the Zionist regime.
He termed the isolation of Syria and disarmament of
Hizbullah as the objectives of the United States and
the Zionist regime.
The Iranian expert further said 'Hizbullah is the
preventive arm of Iran and as long as Hizbullah is powerful,
the Zionist regime would have not dare attack Iran.
He underlined that the security of the Zionist regime
was the major objective of the recent resolution issued
by the UN Security Council against Syria.
Americans use insecurity in Lebanon as a pretext to
fulfill their ambitions over the greatest Middle East,
he added.
He posied that Washington is going to put pressure
on Syria to gain concessions over the developments in
the Middle East. |
BEIRUT (Reuters) - Lebanon's
investigations show that ex-Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri
was almost certainly killed by a suicide car bomb, a
judicial source close to the probe said on Friday.
The source said results of the probe would be released
next week. He expected them to show that a Muslim militant
who had appeared in a video tape claiming responsibility
for the attack was in the car that ripped through Hariri's
motorcade in Beirut on Feb. 14.
"The attack happened when a car slowed up to
allow Hariri's motorcade to pass it. As the motorcade
passed it, the car blew up," the source said.
He said evidence came from a security camera at a
nearby bank which caught parts of the incident.
Lebanon's opposition and the international community
have made revealing the identity of Hariri's killers
a key priority. Many have pointed the finger at Syria,
which is under intense pressure to quit Lebanon. Damascus
has denied any role. [...] |
Afghan President Hamid Karzai yesterday
appointed a controversial commander, General Abdul Rashid
Dostum, as chief of staff to the head of the country's
armed forces -- a post held by Karzai himself. It is
unclear how much authority Dostum will have in this
new position, but the appointment is already being criticized
by rights groups, which accuse Dostum of committing
abuses.
The appointment comes despite calls by organizations
such as Human Rights Watch to marginalize "warlords."
Dostum, one of Afghanistan's most powerful and controversial
commanders, is accused of committing human rights abuses
during the country's civil war in the 1990s. His forces
are also accused of having let hundreds of Taliban fighters
suffocate to death in late 2001 after their capture.
He has denied the allegations.
"General Dostum has a long record of violence,"
Adams said. "He probably has presided over war
crimes in the past, so his appointment is astonishing.
Dostum is one of the main warlords in the county. He
runs his section of the country with an iron fist, tolerates
no opposition and has been involved in illegal activities
for many years. So this may be some kind of tactical
alliance with Karzai but it's a terrible decision."
[...]
Karzai has already given another influential warlord,
Ismail Khan, the former governor of Herat Province,
a post in his cabinet. Reports said Dostum's role will
be mostly symbolic. |
Interview with Craig Murray: Ex-British
Ambassador to Uzbekistan
Q: Could you just give an overview of your current
situation?
CM: I’m still suspended on full pay. That’s
my official status, which is very peculiar. At least
I’m still being paid, but I think they’re
trying to summon up the nerve to sack me. And to do
so, leaving as little comeback as possible for my lawyers
to take them to court. But I’m convinced my career
in the Foreign Office is finished.
Q: Would you want to go back?
CM: I don’t know. I mean, I worked for them for
twenty years. Very, very successfully, on the whole.
Until I went to Uzbekistan my career was a kind of model
of rapid upward progress.
Q: Yes, I heard you were the youngest ever British
ambassador.
CM: Yes, I don’t think that’s actually true.
People say that, but I don’t believe it. Certainly
now, my mate James Clarke has been appointed ambassador
to Luxembourg, and he’s only 34 or something.
But I don’t think I was ever the youngest ever
ambassador, but I was certainly very young for an ambassador.
And particularly very young for an ambassador to a country
which was of some importance.
Q: In one of your first interviews as ambassador
to Uzbekistan you mentioned that it was very difficult
to work there. Was this something that was apparent
right from the beginning, and what sort of difficulties
were you facing?
CM: Well, I think I’ll start by saying, as far
as I can gather, before I got there the British Embassy
did very little at all. I recall, when I arrived the
ambassador’s car – the flag car –
was over three years old. It had only got 10,000 km
on the clock – in three years! And the embassy
drivers…Normally when you arrive at your post
you can rely on your drivers to know where things and
places are, because they’re used to going there.
So places like ministries and important British companies,
you just assume they’ll know where they are. Well,
I found the embassy drivers didn’t know were any
of the places were, because no one in the embassy had
ever been outside the walls of the compound before.
This idea of travelling out, and meeting people, and
doing things was kind of new to them. So that was peculiar.
I remember my first week, I visited a number of British
companies, I visited every British company represented
in Tashkent – which isn’t a great many.
But several of them said they’d never been visited
by a British ambassador before. They nearly all said
that, and BAT (British American Tobacco) was the only
one that had been visited by a British ambassador before.
To me, that was truly shocking.
Q: Why do you think this is?
CM: Because the Foreign Office is full of stuck up,
lazy, out-of-touch people. That’s why. I’m
very bitter now! But Uzbekistan is difficult because
it’s a very nasty, totalitarian dictatorship.
It’s a very efficient totalitarian dictatorship.
Everything that’s done is decided by central government.
I recall, at one time we were arranging a cultural festival,
with some concerts of British music played by a local
orchestra. I was working with the orchestra on that,
to help them get some examples of western-European music,
because their repertoire was actually extremely limited.
Their physical access to sheet music was very limited.
And we discovered that anything the orchestra played
had to be politically vetted as being acceptable in
terms of Uzbek national ideology, which was fascinating.
It was really quite amazing. It’s a completely
mad totalitarian society. They even banned billiards,
I remember, which struck me as peculiarly off-the-wall.
As from this academic year, one day a week has to be
given by all schools and universities to national education,
and national education comprises three things: There’s
Uzbek folk singing and dancing, there’s a very
tendentious version of history – which is called
Uzbek history – and there’s the study of
the works of President Karimov, which is most important
and the largest of the elements. It really is a weird
place to live and work. It’s a kind of cloud-cuckoo-land
place, in which one of the things that makes it difficult
is that people lie to you all
the time. The government lies all the time. Officially
there’s an economic growth of eight and a half
percent this year. In fact, anyone who knows anything
about Uzbekistan knows there’s been negative growth
for the last several years. But it doesn’t stop
them throwing the official statistics at you.
That’s the difficult part, as westerners, to deal
with people who lie to your face, because they’re
not used to that context. I mean, normally we take it
for granted that when people say something to you they
bare some approximation to the truth anyway. In Uzbekistan
you can’t. It’s a very peculiar place to
work.
Q: On the subject of Karimov, he was interviewed
by a Russian news agency earlier this month, and there
were a number of interesting things he was saying. For
example, "External influence will be effective,
only if we permit it to be effective," –
what do you make of this comment?
CM: Well, I think Karimov’s politics are essentially
paranoid. He has a paranoid view of the world, and you
can see the results of that in the physical closing
of borders, the detonating of bridges in the Ferganna
Valley so people can’t get across the border.
The desire for complete control over all media and information.
And anyone who meets Karimov – I’ve been
with many official visitors as they call on him - he
always gives the same opening spiel about how Uzbekistan
is surrounded by enemies, how it’s hemmed in by
the narcotics trade, the Mafia, by the Russians, by
gangsters, by Chinese goods which carry influenza! He
has a paranoid worldview, and I think that this dislike
of the outside world is very notable. I don’t
at all buy his argument that "we can’t have
a western-style democracy in Uzbekistan". Who says
democracy’s western? India’s a democracy.
[...]
Q: A controversial accusation you made was that
MI6 was using information extracted from tortured Uzbek
citizens. What evidence did you actually have to lead
you to this conclusion?
CM: I’ve got no doubts about it whatsoever. I’m
100 percent sure of it, and in all my dealings with
the British government about it – and I’ve
been called back from Uzbekistan to have meetings specifically
on the subject – they have never denied it. The
British government has never denied it, and scores of
British reporters have phoned up the Foreign Office
and said, "What is the line?" and they always
come back with the same line. It’s that "it
would be irresponsible to ignore useful evidence in
the war against terror". They have never said,
"No, we’re not gaining evidence from torture,"
– the British government has never denied it.
They can’t deny it.
Q: Taking things a stage
further, there was a report a little while back about
the American ‘Ghost Planes’ which would
take people to countries where torture was used and
get information from them. Do you know anything about
this?
CM: Well yes, that Gulfstream plane came in to Tashkent
several times while I was there, and it’d bring
in detainees. As far as I’m aware it only
brought in Uzbek detainees from Bagram airport, from
Afghanistan. I’ve had many people allege to me
that Americans used it to bring non-Uzbek-related detainees
in specifically to be tortured for questioning. I never
saw any evidence of that. I’m not saying it isn’t
true, but to my knowledge I only know of it bringing
in detainees from Afghanistan to Uzbekistan.
Q: Well, isn’t it against the UN Convention
Against Torture article 3.1 (No state party shall expel,
return or extradite a person to another state where
there are substantial grounds for believing that he
will be in danger of being subjected to torture) whoever
they were and wherever they were from?
CM: Yes it is contrary to that,
undoubtedly.
Q: And did you bring this up with the American
government?
CM: Yes, I mean, I asked my deputy to speak to the head
of the CIA station in Tashkent. And what I said was,
"I don’t want to put my foot in it here.
Now it’s possible that the CIA have got a special
arrangement with the Uzbek security services which makes
certain that the intelligence they get wasn’t
obtained under torture, maybe they have special photographs,
and CIA people posted at all interrogations, and arrangements
are in place. I don’t want to make a fool of myself.
We need to check that this really is obtained under
torture." So she went and saw the CIA head of station
in Tashkent, and this was in November 2002, and said
to him, "Look, my ambassador’s worried that
the intelligence you’re passing on to MI6 is probably
obtained under torture, and he wants your take on whether
this is possible". And she reported back to me,
absolutely no reason to disbelieve her, the
CIA head of station Tashkent said: "You’re
right, it will be obtained under torture. But, we don’t
see that as a problem." Yes, I’ve got no
doubt at all about it.
Q: And I suppose they justify this by saying it’s
part of the War on Terror?
CM: Yes, but the War on Terror
seems to justify any ablations of human rights whatsoever.
Q: Yes, I was quite interested to see Condoleeza
Rice naming the ‘outposts of tyranny’, which
obviously don’t include Uzbekistan. They’re
Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Zimbabwe, Burma and Belarus.
CM: I think it’s fascinating
that the Americans are much harder on human rights in
Kazakhstan, which although bad, isn’t nearly as
bad as Uzbekistan. It’s quite amazing really,
and the Americans amaze me with their hypocrisy.
Q: Is it something to do with the huge business
possibilities in Kazakhstan? Are they trying to clean
it up?
CM: Yes, I think their attitude
towards anywhere depends on what’s best for the
American oil and gas interests in effect. And
I think that American oil and gas interests weren’t
doing as well as they’d wanted in Kazakhstan so
they then hit the country over the head with the human
rights stick in an effort to loosen it up, with that
motive. I think that’s certainly true. Uzbekistan
they want to keep sweet because their airbase is seen
as central to their policy of military domination of
the oil and gas regions. So that’s why. But I
think for Condoleeza Rice to name those countries, did
she name Zimbabwe?
Q: Yes, that was one of the ones.
CM: Well, in Zimbabwe, for example, they’ve got
a very unpleasant government but it doesn’t practice
torture on anything like the scale that Karimov does,
and there is an opposition. They’ve just had democratic
elections in Uzbekistan, so-called, and the opposition
weren’t allowed to contest them. I
saw a most wonderful statement from the American ambassador,
a load of pious rubbish, where he applauded the elections
as a step on the road to democracy, and then at the
end said it was unfortunate that the opposition weren’t
allowed to take part! But I mean, in Zimbabwe,
at least the opposition can actually stand in elections
and there are actually opposition members of parliament,
there is an independent judiciary. There are none of
those things in Uzbekistan. Uzbekistan is, by any measure,
a much worse dictatorship than Zimbabwe, and Condoleeza
Rice is just talking, well, crap.
[...]
Q: And where does the British government stand?
A: I think when it comes to the
War on Terror the British government doesn’t have
its own policy. It’s simply following United States
policy. It’s policy is to stay in line with the
United States, or as Tony Blair would put it, ‘To
stay shoulder to shoulder with the United States’
– even when the United States is very obviously
acting appallingly.
Q: What are your plans for the future?
A: My immediate plans…I intend to stand against
Jack Straw in his Blackburn constituency. Just to annoy
him. And to bring home this question of complicity with
dictatorships, complicity with torture in the War on
Terror, because Jack Straw himself personally took the
decision to use Uzbek torture-based intelligence. It
was put to him, he discussed it. He discussed it with
the head of MI6 and they decided they would continue
using it. So I want to hold him accountable for that,
and to make sure that the electors and his own constituency
know all about it. I’m not anticipating being
elected I should hasten to say. You can be the first
people to publish that!
Q: You’ve almost finished writing a book
on your experiences over the last two years, but what
else are you doing, or planning to do, at present?
CM: I do a number of lectures, and I’ve got a
few more lined up The book is going to be the main thing.
And there are a couple of major television documentaries
coming out in the spring, on the torture issue. I’ve
already pre-recorded quite long interviews for those.
I did an appearance on ‘Hard Talk’, so I’m
continuing to do quite a lot of media and broadcast
work. It’s not something I intend to let drop.
Q: And in the long term would you like to return
to Uzbekistan?
CM: Oh yes, I love the country. I love the people, generally.
I’ve got lots of good friends there. I fully intend
to go back once we’ve got rid of the dictatorship.
But that will be some time yet. I can’t see any
signs of hope on the horizon. The people get steadily
poorer. It’s pretty desperate there, this winter
again, with salaries months behind, no heating at all,
and cold weather. There’s no sign of economic
reform. And one thing I want to do is start a campaign
against Uzbek cotton, because the ordinary people of
Uzbekistan don’t benefit at all from the cotton.
They get pressed as slave labour to pick it. Children
of seven and up have to pick cotton, living in pretty
awful conditions in the fields. It’s child slave
labour that picks most of Uzbekistan’s cotton,
and I hope to start a campaign on that issue. Uzbek
cotton is still 100% state grown. Workers on state farms,
who make up 60% of the population, get $2 a month. So
it seems to me that a campaign against Uzbek cotton
is a good idea. The difficulty is that you can’t
do it by consumer boycott, because there’s no
way of telling where those fibers in your shirt came
from!
Unfortunately my voice recorder ran out at this stage,
but I took detailed notes throughout the interview,
which went on for another ten minutes or so. He spoke
about his unexplained illness – heart problem
– which almost killed him 48 hours after returning
to Tashkent for the last time. To this day, he doesn’t
know if it was the result of a deliberate attempt on
his life, but believes it probably was. Whatever the
reason, it has left him with a serious heart condition
for which he’ll undergo major heart-surgery in
March this year.
He also spoke of a protest by around 100 Uzbek citizens
outside the British Embassy in Tashkent – one
of the largest ever protests under Karimov’s regime
- after he’d been removed from Uzbekistan for
raising too many issues the British government would
rather not discuss. The peaceful demonstrators were
‘dispersed’ by the Uzbek police –
who severely beat them (including the women and children).
Craig Murray assumes that this was at the request of
the British Embassy. If you’d like any more detailed
information on these extra areas, let me know and I’ll
send them through.
To date, no accusations against Craig Murray of misconduct
have been proved by the FCO. He remains indefinitely
suspended on full pay. |
America and Europe were yesterday
being drawn ever closer into a trade war after senior
US congressman issued a blunt warning to the EU over
its plans to lift a 15-year-old arms embargo on China.
Talking explicitly about how it would retaliate for
the first time, Richard Lugar, the powerful republican
head of the Senate foreign relations committee, warned
that the US would stop sales of military technology
to Europe.
His Democratic counterpart, Senator Joseph Biden, warned
that the lifting of the ban would be "a non-starter
with Congress". Their tough words came after a
meeting with President George Bush in the White House.
Analysts warned the looming row could undo the repairs
made to the US-EU relationship by Mr Bush's visit to
Europe last month. "Europe
can do defence trade with China or it can do defence
trade with the US. It can't do both," said
Daniel Goure, a Pentagon consultant and a vice president
of the Lexington Institute, a military thinktank. [...]
The Pentagon is increasingly
concerned over an ambitious Chinese military build-up
which its experts believe is aimed at threatening Taiwan.
The US is committed to Taiwan's defence. "Balance
in the Taiwan straits is delicate enough that European
military trade with China could tip it,"
Mr Goure said.
He said Beijing was acquiring up to 600 advanced Russian
fighter jets, Mig-31s and Mig-35s, and had bought modern
Russian destroyers and submarines. But
the US was most worried about sales of advanced European
communications and sensor systems, like fibre optics,
infra-red, sonar and radar scanners.
According to the New York Times, recent US intelligence
pictures have painted an even more worrying picture
of the Chinese build-up, with the reported construction
of 23 amphibious assault ships.
Philip Gordon, an expert on transatlantic relations
at the Brookings Institution in Washington, outlined
a possible compromise involving strict controls and
links between the lifting of the embargo and China's
human rights performance. "Whether we get there
is not sure," he said. "There
are a lot of people in the House [of Representatives]
who want to whack Europe anyway." |
BEIJING - China Friday urged calm
and restraint after North Korea ended a self-imposed
moratorium on testing long-range missiles, drawing criticism
from the United States and Japan.
"The Chinese side hopes the Korean peninsula
can maintain peace and stability," foreign ministry
spokesman Liu Jianchao said in response to questions
about Pyongyang's move.
"All sides should remain calm and exercise restraint
and commonly devote themselves to the resolution of
the concerned issues through political dialogue and
negotiations."
North Korea, which is boycotting six-party talks on
its nuclear arms program, announced Thursday it was
ending a moratorium on testing long-range missiles that
it declared in 1999.
A statement by the official Korean
Central News Agency (KCNA) also said that a "hostile"
US policy was forcing it to develop its nuclear arsenal.
Washington said the decision was "not helpful"
while Tokyo called it an "unproductive" negotiating
tool.
North Korea shocked the world by firing a missile
over Japan into the Pacific Ocean in 1998 and calling
it a satellite launch.
China has brokered three rounds of six-party talks
that include the two Koreas, the United States, Japan
and Russia, but has been unable to get Pyongyang back
to the table following the last round in June.
A recent flurry of diplomatic activity has seen efforts
been made at restarting the talks aimed at persuading
Pyongyang to give up its nuclear ambitions in return
for badly-needed aid. |
Police Sergeant
Suicided To Keep Truth Hidden
The terror loosed in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995,
was created by criminals and murderers directed by and
paid for by the federal government. This is the only
conclusion that can be reached by a calm analysis of
the facts.*
The case of Sgt. Terry Yeakey is only one of a myriad
of dramatic stories that could be told—stories
just waiting for Hollywood, but out of bounds for public
consumption.
It has been nearly 10 years since Oklahoma City’s
Murrah building was blown apart one quiet April morning.
Contrary to news reports, the persons found guilty and
sentenced for the Murrah bombing atrocity could not
have been solely responsible. An Oklahoma City police
sergeant became aware of this before anyone else, apparently
during the first hour of rescue. He paid for that discovery
with his life.
Yeakey, an African-American hero if there ever was
one, was a giant of a man with a heart as big as the
rest of him. As the first cop on the Murrah building
scene following the explosions, he became a crusader
for truth.
There is a memorable news photo of his 6-foot, 3-inch,
nearly 300-pound frame sprinting down NW 5th Street
toward the building on one of the many rescue missions
he performed that ugly day. He worked for 48 hours without
sleep.
After numerous private investigators produced evidence
of multiple explosions, unexploded bombs being hauled
away by the authorities, and the incapability of an
ammonium nitrate fuel oil bomb to cause the kind of
devastation seen in downtown Oklahoma City, a giant
government cover-up became obvious.
But Yeakey knew it long before the rest of us. Only
a couple of hours into the rescue, Yeakey became painfully
aware of something disturbing. Did he somehow figure
out that the building had been blown from the inside
and that the news reports were fabrications?
Did he overhear a strange conversation from some of
the many Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF)
agents who were on the scene sooner than they should
have been?
Whatever it was, Yeakey was upset. He called his wife
that morning crying, "It’s not true. It’s
not what they are saying. It didn’t happen that
way."
Yeakey ran back and forth into that concrete mess of
bricks and mortar all day long and continued beyond
exhaustion, far into the night.
In a cadre of heroes that day, Yeakey’s performance
was outstanding. On May 11, the following year he was
scheduled to receive the Medal of Valor from the Oklahoma
City Police Department (OCPD). He never got it. He was
murdered on May 8, 1996, in the country, two and a half
miles west of the El Reno Penitentiary. His body was
found a mile from his blood-soaked car.
The official report said "suicide." However,
many people who knew Yeakey have questioned that, as
the inside of Terry’s private automobile was described
by witnesses as looking like someone had "butchered
a hog" on the front seat. There was much blood
on the back seat, too, but little or none where his
body was found a mile away.
More suspiciously, his private bombing reports were
missing from his car and have never been found.
According to the report, while still inside his Ford
Probe that he had parked on a lonely country road, Yeakey
slashed himself 11 times on both forearms before cutting
his throat twice near the jugular vein. Then, apparently
seeking an even more private place to die, he crawled
8,000 feet through rough terrain and climbed a fence
before shooting himself in the head with a small caliber
revolver, which he apparently took with him to the hereafter.
Independent investigators speculated that had Yeakey
shot himself with his own gun, a Glock 9mm, there would
have been significantly more damage to his head than
was evident.
What appeared to be rope burns on his neck, handcuff
bruises to his wrists, and muddy grass embedded in his
slash wounds strongly indicated that he had some help
in traversing his final distance.
However, the information about the victim undergoing
a violent beating prior to his "suicide" was
left off the medical examiner’s report.
The bullet’s entrance wound was in the right
temple, above the eye. It went through the policeman’s
head and exited in the area of the left cheek, near
the bottom of the earlobe line. The trajectory was from
a 40-45 degree angle above his head. There were no powder
burns.
According to unnamed officers, 40 or more law enforcement
personnel were at the scene combing the area for the
"suicide" weapon, but were unsuccessful for
more than an hour.
But after an FBI helicopter landed at the scene carrying
FBI SAC Bob Ricks, "Yeakey’s weapon"
was suddenly discovered only five minutes later. Of
course, it was not Yeakey’s police issue handgun,
and the description of the weapon has never been made
public, but the official record immediately became that
of "suicide."
One of the last people Yeakey talked to was a friend
who knew he was on a mission of private investigation.
Yeakey had told him that he was on his way to El Reno
to check out something, but first he had to shake the
FBI agents who were following him.
He reportedly stopped at a café in El Reno and
spoke with a friend and had either lunch or coffee there
around noon. His body was found at 1:30 p.m. the same
day, yet his family was not notified until the following
day on May 9.
Tonya Yeakey, the mother of his children, later reported
in a radio interview that Yeakey had shared a secret
safe deposit box with Dr. Charles Chumley at one of
the downtown Oklahoma City banks. Despite denials by
OCPD officials, Mrs. Yeakey maintains that Yeakey and
Chumley were friends even before the bombing and that
they had conferred several times regarding pictures
from the scene and the distorted truth of the official
story.
She suspects that the bank box contained incriminating
pictures, but the private bank box in mention was closed
and its contents emptied immediately after Yeakey’s
death. Mrs. Yeakey does not know who
authorized it, and whatever contents were there have
never surfaced.
Chumley had only worked side by side with Yeakey during
those first hours and days of rescue, but also had defied
the federal officers at the scene who reportedly attempted
to have him falsify reports.
Chumley, a private pilot, had also died mysteriously
when his plane went into a nosedive from 6,000 feet
into a cabbage field following a takeoff from Amarillo
in August 1995. FAA investigators found "nothing
mechanically wrong" to cause such a bizarre accident
and it remains a unsolved.
Including Chumley and Yeakey, there have been more
than 30 suspicious deaths of witnesses who harbored
information pertinent to the truth in the OKC case.
During recent decades, much of the FBI has earned the
reputation of being more of a government protectorate
than an efficient investigative agency.
Although the Yeakey incident occurred 30 miles away
in a different jurisdiction, the investigation was quickly
taken out of the hands of the El Reno police and the
Canadian County sheriff and turned over to the OCPD
and the FBI. No homicide investigation was conducted,
and there was no autopsy.
The funeral director reported that the cuts described
as "superficial" in the medical examiner’s
report were so severe that they had to be sewn up to
prevent leakage before the body could be embalmed.
One retired cop, who preferred anonymity, suggested
that the strange hush-up of a cop killing was easily
instigated by the FBI because of its knowledge of drug
crimes within the ranks of the OCPD.
"It’s a hammer that [FBI agents] have held
over our heads for a long time," he said.
In an exclusive interview with American Free Press,
Mrs. Yeaky said that her husband had been upset by something
he had seen under the day care center during the rescue
operation. He had wanted to go back and photograph it,
but the officials would not let him onto the site again.
She said Yeakey had been ordered by his superiors at
OCPD to rewrite his nine-page report to omit and alter
certain facts and to condense it to but one page.
She said she was told by her husband’s superior,
Lt. Joann Randall, in a brief but hostile telephone
exchange, to "tell Terry that if the new report
is not submitted by the end of the week, he will be
put on reprimand."
Mrs. Yeakey also said Yeakey was supposed to be decorated
for his work as a rescue person, but didn’t really
want the limelight. She said Yeakey felt the investigation
was fraudulent and didn’t like the fact that the
OCPD was honoring people who weren’t deserving.
Yeakey had told friends that he was going out of town
to hide or secure "evidence of a cover-up of the
bombing by federal agents." |
WASHINGTON — A
pair of Jewish groups accused Sen. Robert Byrd on Wednesday
of making an outrageous and reprehensible comparison
between Adolf Hitler's Nazis and a Senate GOP plan to
block Democrats from filibustering. A GOP senator
called for Byrd to retract his remarks.
Byrd spokesman Tom Gavin denied that Byrd, D-W.Va.,
had compared Republicans to Hitler. He said that instead,
the reference to Nazis in a Senate speech on Tuesday
was meant to underscore that the past should not be
ignored.
"Terrible chapters of history
ought never be repeated," Gavin said. "All
one needs to do is to look at history to see how dangerous
it is to curb the rights of the minority."
Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, the Senate's No.
3 Republican, called for Byrd to retract his comments,
saying they "lessen the
credibility of the senator and the decorum of the Senate."
Ken Mehlman, chairman of the Republican National Committee,
called the remarks "poisonous rhetoric" that
are "reprehensible and beyond the pale."
Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation
League, said Byrd's remarks showed "a profound
lack of understanding as to who Hitler was" and
that the senator should apologize to the American people.
"It is hideous, outrageous
and offensive for Senator Byrd to suggest that the Republican
Party's tactics could in any way resemble those of Adolf
Hitler and the Nazi Party," Foxman said.
In his comments Tuesday, Byrd defended the right senators
have to use filibusters — procedural delays that
can kill an item unless 60 of the 100 senators vote
to move ahead.
Byrd cited Hitler's 1930s rise to power
by, in part, pushing legislation through the German
parliament that seemed to legitimize his ascension.
"We, unlike Nazi Germany or Mussolini's Italy,
have never stopped being a nation of laws, not of men,"
Byrd said. "But witness how
men with motives and a majority can manipulate law to
cruel and unjust ends."
Byrd then quoted historian Alan
Bullock, saying Hitler "turned the law inside out
and made illegality legal." [...]
"In the Senate, when a majority runs roughshod
over the minority, the people's liberties can be in
danger," Gavin said. "That majority may be
a majority of one party or a majority of one region
or a majority of one interest.
Brooks said his group's counterpart, the National Jewish
Democratic Council, should condemn Byrd's comments.
Ira Foreman, executive director of the Democratic group,
declined to comment. |
Not to speak out
against this injustice would not only be wrong. It would
ignore the threat it poses to us all
Racism is a uniquely reactionary ideology, used to
justify the greatest crimes in history - the slave trade,
the extermination of all original inhabitants of the
Caribbean, the elimination of every native inhabitant
of Tasmania, apartheid. The Holocaust was the ultimate,
"industrialised" expression of racist barbarity.
Racism serves as the cutting edge of the most reactionary
movements. An ideology that starts by declaring one
human being inferior to another is the slope whose end
is at Auschwitz. That is why I detest racism.
No serious commentator has argued that my comments
to an Evening Standard reporter outside City Hall last
month were anti-semitic. So I am glad that Henry Grunwald,
president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews,
accepted on these pages that "Ken is sincere when
he states that he regards the Holocaust as the worst
crime of the last century".
The contribution of Jewish people to human civilisation
and culture is unexcelled and extraordinary. You only
have to think of giants such as Einstein, Freud and
Marx to realise that human civilisation would be unrecognisably
diminished without the achievements of the Jewish people.
The same goes for the Jewish contribution to London
today.
As mayor, I have pressed for police action over anti-semitic
attacks at the highest level, and my administration
has backed a series of initiatives of importance to
the Jewish community, including hosting the Anne Frank
exhibition at City Hall and measures to ensure the go-ahead
for the north London eruv.
Throughout the 1970s, I worked happily with the Board
of Deputies in campaigns against the National Front.
Problems began when, as leader of the Greater London
Council, I rejected the board's request that I should
fund only Jewish organisations that it approved of.
The Board of Deputies was unhappy that I funded Jewish
organisations campaigning for gay rights and others
that disagreed with policies of the Israeli government.
Relations with the board took a dramatic turn for the
worse when I opposed Israel's illegal invasion of Lebanon,
culminating in the massacres at the Palestinian camps
of Sabra and Shatila. The board also opposed my involvement
in the successful campaign in 1982 to convince the Labour
party to recognise the PLO as the legitimate voice of
the Palestinian people.
The fundamental issue on which we
differ, as Henry Grunwald knows, is not anti-semitism
- which my administration has fought tooth and nail
- but the policies of successive Israeli governments.
To avoid manufactured misunderstandings, the policies
of Israeli governments are not analogous to Nazism.
They do not aim at the systematic extermination of the
Palestinian people, in the way Nazism sought the annihilation
of the Jews.
Israel's expansion has included ethnic cleansing. Palestinians
who had lived in that land for centuries were driven
out by systematic violence and terror aimed at ethnically
cleansing what became a large part of the Israeli state.
The methods of groups like the Irgun and the Stern gang
were the same as those of the Bosnian Serb leader Karadzic:
to drive out people by terror.
Today the Israeli government continues seizures of
Palestinian land for settlements, military incursions
into surrounding countries and denial of the right of
Palestinians expelled by terror to return. Ariel Sharon,
Israel's prime minister, is a war criminal who should
be in prison, not in office. Israel's own Kahan commission
found that Sharon shared responsibility for the Sabra
and Shatila massacres.
Sharon continues to organise terror. More than three
times as many Palestinians as Israelis have been killed
in the present conflict. There are more than 7,000 Palestinians
in Israel's jails.
To obscure these truths, those around Israel's present
government have resorted to demonisation. Initial targets
were Palestinians, and have now become Muslims. Take
the Middle East Media Research Institute, run by a former
colonel in Israeli military intelligence, which poses
as a source of objective information but in reality
selectively translates material from Arabic and presents
Muslims and Arabs in the worst possible light.
Today the Israeli government is helping to promote
a wholly distorted picture of racism and religious discrimination
in Europe, implying that the most serious upsurge of
hatred and discrimination is against Jews.
All racist and anti-semitic attacks must be stamped
out. However, the reality is that the great bulk of
racist attacks in Europe today are on black people,
Asians and Muslims - and they are the primary targets
of the extreme right. For 20 years Israeli governments
have attempted to portray anyone who forcefully criticises
the policies of Israel as anti-semitic. The truth is
the opposite: the same universal human values that recognise
the Holocaust as the greatest racist crime of the 20th
century require condemnation of the policies of successive
Israeli governments - not on the absurd grounds that
they are Nazi or equivalent to the Holocaust, but because
ethnic cleansing, discrimination and terror are immoral.
They are also fuelling anger and violence across the
world. For a mayor of London not to speak out against
such injustice would not only be wrong - but would also
ignore the threat it poses to the security of all Londoners.
· Ken Livingstone is the London mayor |
The Israeli government has ordered
the confiscation of large swathes of Palestinian land
in the West Bank.
The area to be seized encompasses more than 10sq km
of land in the southern West Bank, especially in the
Hebron region.
According to the confiscation orders, which were published
on Wednesday, the Israeli army will expropriate the
land extending from the village of al-Burj to southern
Yatta.
This covers hundreds of acres of farmland, including
numerous olive groves, and will further diminish the
size of any prospective Palestinian state in the West
Bank.
Israel has already annexed more than a 100sq km of
West Bank land, ostensibly to build a gigantic separation
wall which snakes through Palestinian towns and villages,
reducing some of them to virtual detention camps.
Land grabs
Moreover, dozens of other Jewish settlements in the
heart of the West Bank, such as Ma'ali Adomim near Jerusalem
and Ariel, south of Nablus, continue to expand at the
expense of Palestinian territory.
"They (the Israelis) act as if
there is an unwritten understanding between the US and
Israel whereby US officials make statements opposing
settlement expansion while Israel keeps up the 'good
work'"
Palestinian analysts say these land-grabs fly in the
face of international efforts to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict.
According to Abd al-Hadi Hantash, who has been monitoring
Israeli settlement activities for the past 25 years,
the purpose of the latest seizure is to "make any
prospective Palestinian state as small as possible and
as unviable as possible".
"Israel believes that President [George] Bush
is not really serious about a viable Palestinian state,
they think that he is just bamboozling the Arabs.
"This is how they interpret American reluctance
to force Israel to halt the land confiscation and settlement
expansion."
Separation barrier
He added: "They (the Israelis) act as if there
is an unwritten understanding between the US and Israel
whereby US officials make statements opposing settlement
expansion while Israel keeps up the 'good work'."
A spokesman for the Israeli government told Aljazeera.net:
"The expropriation is necessary to build the separation
fence to prevent terror attacks on Israeli citizens
- this is not a permanent confiscation, it is only a
temporary security measure."
However, the confiscation orders, handed over to landowners
in the Hebron area, do not state that the confiscation
is temporary.
"From the very first day of the occupation in
1967, successive Israeli governments always claimed
that the recurrent confiscations were temporary security
measures. Then we ended up having more than 230 settlements,
swallowing up over 55% of the West Bank," Hantash
said. |
Israel's bid to grab Palestinian
land and its strangulation of the Palestinian economy
are destroying hopes for an end to the Middle East conflict,
a new report has said.
Christian Aid, a UK-based aid agency, said on Thursday
that without urgent international intervention generations
of Palestinians and Israelis face a future of crippling
poverty and relentless insecurity.
Its report, Facts on the Ground, explains how Israel
is taking more land from the occupied West Bank for
Jewish settler roads and settlements.
As a result, Christian Aid says, poverty and unemployment
levels are rising, malnutrition and anaemia are mounting,
and farmers are being prevented from tilling their land.
In the West Bank, illegal Jewish settlements
control 42% of the land.
Israelis-only roads and highways criss-cross Palestinian
territory, intersecting villages in the West Bank and
cutting the Gaza Strip in three.
Unable to get their goods to market or travel to work,
Christian Aid says Palestinians are seeing their economy
strangled and their future vanishing before their eyes.
'Politics of separation'
The aid agency adds the separation barrier which surrounds
large parts of the West Bank is the starkest sign yet
of Israel's politics of separation.
For Palestinians, there is no freedom of movement between
its two sides except through Israeli-controlled military
checkpoints.
"Israel has steadily built and
then expanded settlements on the land which it has occupied
since 1967 in violation of international law,"
the report said.
"The announcement, in August
2004, that another thousand homes were to be built in
the West Bank is a sign of the impunity with which Israel
operates.
"This steady expansion, together
with the construction of the separation barrier through
the West Bank is creating ever greater hardship.
"These settlements have all but
destroyed the possibility of a viable Palestinian state."
Christian Aid says the two-state solution would make
it possible for Palestinians to tackle the endemic poverty
that permeates the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
Palestinian elections
It also offers Palestinians and Israelis the prospect
of security and sovereignty that both peoples so desperately
need.
"The increasing culture of violence, marked by
suicide bombings, overwhelming military force in civilian
areas and wanton destruction, threatens people in the
region and beyond," said the Christian Aid report.
"But the policies of separation and division which
we see today are heightening, not solving, the conflict.
"The UK, Irish and EU governments have a legal
obligation, under international law, to ensure they
hold Israel to account for its actions in the Occupied
Palestinian Territories."
In particular, Christian Aid recommends that Jewish
settlements and their infrastructure be dismantled,
and construction of the separation barrier around the
West Bank be halted.
It also recommends that Palestinians be allowed to
hold free and fair elections in the Occupied Territories.
Following the report's publication, Chris Doyle, director
of the Council for Arab-British Understanding, urged
the British government to take seriously Christian Aid's
findings and recommendations.
One-state solution?
"It is crystal clear that action is urgently needed
to prevent both a full scale humanitarian disaster,
but also the death of the two state solution around
which an international consensus has so successfully
been built over the last two decades.
"For too long successive Israeli governments have
been allowed to ignore international criticism about
the settlement policy and the building of the separation
wall.
"It is also to be hoped that the British Prime
Minister, when as promised gets re-engaged with the
Israeli-Palestinian issue after November, urgently considers
these recommendations."
Aljazeera.net's correspondent in the West Bank says
a significant minority of Palestinians who believe Israel
will never allow a viable Palestinian state now favour
a one-state solution.
This would entail Jews, Muslims and Christians living
side by side in all of historic Palestine on the basis
of equal rights for all.
However, the main obstacle to this solution is Israel's
fear that it would effectively signal the end of Zionism
and its elevation of Jews above other peoples.
Israel, meanwhile, argues it is unrealistic for it
to return to its 1967 boundaries as West Bank settlements
have become large population centres.
And it says it has been forced to build the separation
wall to keep out Palestinian "suicide bombers"
intent on killing Israeli civilians. |
NABLUS, West Bank - Palestinian
militants blew up a car bomb near Israeli soldiers guarding
Jewish worshippers at a flashpoint shrine in the West
Bank Thursday, dealing another blow to a tattered cease-fire.
The bombing outside Joseph's
Tomb in Nablus, which caused no Israeli casualties but
wounded a Palestinian mother and her four children,
came two days after world leaders at a London meeting
urged more forceful Palestinian action against armed
groups.
Acting on President Mahmoud Abbas's orders, security
forces have arrested six Palestinians this week following
a suicide bombing that killed five Israelis Friday and
threatened to unravel a de facto truce, a senior official
said.
But that did not prevent Thursday's attack in Nablus.
The car bomb blew up shortly after midnight as a contingent
of Israeli troops guarded a group of religious Jews
praying inside the shrine, an Israeli army spokesman
said.
The blast damaged adjacent cars and nearby buildings.
A Palestinian security source said a local cell from
al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, part of Abbas's mainstream
Fatah faction, had claimed responsibility for the bombing.
Palestinian militants have ratcheted up attacks against
Israel in recent days, undermining
a de facto truce that was declared at a Feb.
8 peace summit by Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon. |
GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip (AP) - An
explosion rocked the Rafah refugee camp in the southern
Gaza Strip on Friday, wounding four people, witnesses
said.
There were no details on the cause of the explosion.
The Israeli army did not immediately comment. [...] |
The Venezuelan leader accuses the
US of trying to kill him
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has renewed a threat
to halt oil supplies to the United States if Washington
hurts the Latin American country.
Relations between Washington and Venezuela - which
exports the bulk of its oil to the US - have been badly
strained since Chavez last month accused Washington
of plotting to have him assassinated.
"If there is any aggression, there will be no
oil," Chavez, who is in New Delhi on a four-day
visit, was quoted by the Press Trust of India as saying
on Friday.
"We want to supply oil to the US. We're not going
to avoid this supply of oil unless US government gets
a little bit crazy and tries to hurt us," he said
after a ceremonial welcome at the Indian president's
palace.
The US State Department has dismissed Chavez's accusations
that Washington is seeking to have him killed as "ridiculous
and untrue".
Venezuela is the world's fifth-biggest oil exporter
and is among the largest providers to the US.
Deeply troubling
Chavez, who is on a trip to India where energy will
top the agenda, started alleging Washington was planning
his death after the US criticised some of his government's
actions as "deeply troubling".
Chavez said the oil price increase
had nothing to do with Opec
Earlier this month, Chavez told a news conference in
Uruguay that the US would not receive a drop of oil
if he were to be killed.
Asked whether the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (Opec), of which Venezuela is a member, will
increase output to cool near-record prices, Chavez said
on Friday that the cartel was "producing enough".
"[The] increasing price of oil has nothing to
do with Opec. It is the structure of the market,"
he said, adding Opec was evaluating the situation.
Chavez has signed oil deals with various countries
including China since last year and is due to approve
an energy agreement intended to enhance cooperation
with India during his visit.
Energy-hungry India, which imports nearly 70% of its
fuel needs, has been scouring the world for new supplies
to keep its fast-growing economy on track. |
Condoleeza Rice attacked Venezuela
and President Chavez sharply in her testimony yesterday.
She called Venezuela "very deeply troubling"
and suggested that it was a primary concern for the
Bush administration.
Get ready for another war because Venezuela is the
world's 5th largest oil exporting nation and they are
turning off the taps to Bushco's Texas oil friends.
The conflict is about to hit boiling point. Venezuela
has been phasing out the old oil contracts which allowed
Texas oil companies to operate fields and pocket the
revenues. Instead they adopted a policy in which Petroleos
de Venezuela operates joint ventures in which it has
the majority stake with state-owned developers from
nations such as Russia and China, posing a direct threat
to US dominance of Venezuelan fields.
Venezuela has been using its rapidly escalating oil
revenues to introduce universal healthcare, state pensions
and social housing for the 80 percent of the population
living in poverty. This has made Mr Chavez hugely popular
in Venezuela but roundly hated in Texas and Washington
Diaries: LondonYank's diary:
Even when pressed, Condoleeza couldn't say anything
nice about President Chavez:
She reserved some of her harshest language, not for
China or Russia, but for President Hugo Chávez
of Venezuela, whose government she said had "not
been constructive" because of his tough tactics
against the news media and the opposition.
"Is it possible for you to say something positive
about the Chávez administration?" Mr. Chafee
asked, apparently taken aback at the toughness of her
words.
When Ms. Rice said "it's pretty hard, Senator,
to find something positive," Mr. Chafee said her
attitude "seems disrespectful to the Venezuelan
people" who elected Mr. Chávez.
Here's how one might expect Bushco to escalate problems
in Venezuela and promote regime change so that his friends
in Texas can go back to business as usual:
* Bankroll a coup attempt by US sympathisers using
US taxpayer funds;
* Base US Navy ships off the Venezuelan coast to support
the coup attempt and redeploy them again now (no cite,
but US Navy ships were deployed to Venezuela two weeks
ago);
* Use the same Congress-funded cover op which financed
the coup to lead a press campaign against Venezuela
for charging the coup conspirators in the coup with
taking their money;
* Get a friendly neighboring country to bribe Venezuelan
military and police into kidnapping a political figure
to support charges of harbouring terrorists and creating
a major diplomatic dispute;
* Get the Washington Post to write a scary editorial
about commies in our backyard who are suppressing dissent,
buying weapons from the Russkis, and consorting with
Cubans.
I wish I was making all this up. I just connected the
dots for myself within the last 2 hours, but it hangs
together too well for me not to be very deeply troubled. |
TOKYO — An earthquake registering
a preliminary magnitude of 3.6 jolted the center of
Niigata Prefecture on Friday morning, the Japan Meteorological
Agency said.
There were no immediate reports of injuries or damage
from the 6:13 a.m. quake. The quake measured 3 on the
Japanese seismic intensity scale of 7 in the city of
Ojiya in the prefecture, the agency said. |
QUETTA, Pakistan - Five members
of the same family died Friday when their mud-brick
home collapsed, pushing the death toll from a fresh
spate of torrential rains in southwestern Pakistan to
19, police said.
Two women and three children perished in Kili Nausar,
on the outskirts of Quetta, the capital of Baluchistan
province, "when the roof caved in due to incessant
rain," police officer Aminullah Khilji told AFP.
The latest rains come at the end of a bitter winter
in which at least 550 Pakistanis have died from torrential
rain, snow and avalanches. [...] |
TOKYO - Unusually heavy snowfall
blanketed Tokyo on Friday, cancelling or delaying dozens
of flights and trains and slowing down road traffic.
Some two centimeters (four-fifths of an inch) of snow
accumulated in downtown Tokyo, the first time since
1998 that more than one centimeter of snow covered the
Japanese capital, according to the meteorological agency.
[...] |
(British Columbia) - Whether it’s
actually a speck of cottonwood fluff, a small bug darting
around in the sun or an alien ship come to inspect life
in Fort St. John, one local man is certain that for
now, he has pictures of an unidentified flying object.
Mark Mann has been taking video footage of the sky
for a couple of years now and has come up with some
remarkable images by pointing his camera to a brightly
lit area of the sky, where the sun has just tucked behind
a building to leave a backlit area just to the side
of it.
“There’s hundreds of these things, they’re
just everywhere,” said Mann of the rounded objects
he’s seen flitting across his video screen. When
he slows down the tape frame by frame, Mann can spot
the “spinning turnips” that seem to radiate
light.
Mann has sent the footage to a UFO group in New York
that estimated the object’s
speed across the sky at up to 18,000 miles per hour
and at a size of 15-25 feet in diameter.
“These things are highly polished and moving
very fast,” he said. “I don’t know
exactly what they are, but they’re solid and silent.
“The definition of UFO is an unidentified object…I
can’t begin to imagine where they’re from,
but they’re not ours. I’ve seen too many
different shapes and different sizes, and too many people
have been seeing them in different places.”
Mann has also been in touch with Brian Vike, a UFO
enthusiast who collects reports of sightings. Vike,
who lives in Houston, B.C., is a member of several national
and international astronomical societies and appears
regularly on radio programs in the Okanagan, Alberta
and the U.S.
Vike has seen Mann’s nighttime footage and originally
thought it could be a bright star. But when the object
disappeared after two days, he wasn’t so sure.
“It stands out in the sky like
a sore thumb…if it was a star it should have showed
up again after two days.”
Vike said many sky observers have used a technique
similar to Mann’s for daytime shots that reveal
“little blobs flying around” that could
be anything from cottonwood fluff to dandelions or,
quite possibly, UFOs.
Environment Canada spokesman Bill Miller said they
used to receive several UFO reports from the Peace region
that were attributed to the lights of a weather balloon
at night. But as for Mann’s sightings, Miller
didn’t want to hazard a guess.
“Some could be bugs,” Vike offered. “With
the sun behind the building if something comes between
the camera and the sun it will look very bright. In
Mark’s footage it looked like a giant hamburger,
so I don’t know what it is.”
Graham Conway heads up a group called UFO B.C. And
while he figures the bug explanation is reasonable,
he doesn’t quite buy it.
“Depending on the time of year, say when it’s
colder in the fall or winter, the insect theory doesn’t
stand up.”
Vike has heard reports of sightings in the North Peace
region from the 1970s but said there seems to be a lull
right now, likely because people are afraid of the ridicule
from friends and family.
Mann’s had his share of naysayers, but is adamant
about what he’s seen.
“I’ve had friends who say no way, but
seeing is believing. There’s nothing I can do
to convince people until they see it for themselves.”
Vike can’t say for sure what’s in Mann’s
photos, but he’s not ruling out some extraterrestrial
visitors.
“We can’t be the only life form in this
universe,” he said. “There’s a lot
more questions and not enough answers, but we can’t
be the only life form in this vastness.” |
Readers
who wish to know more about who we are and what we do may visit
our portal site Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|