|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
The
Dollar Illusion
Signs Economic Commentary |
Donald Hunt
February 20, 2005 |
The Dow closed at 10,785.22 on
Friday, down slightly (0.1%) from last week's 10,796,01.
The NASDAQ closed at 2,058.62, down 0.9% from last week's
close of 2076.66. The interest rate on the ten-year
US Treasury Bond was 4.26% up sharply from last week's
4.08%. Gold closed at $427.10 (324.60 euros) an ounce,
up 1.2% in dollars from last week's $422.00 (327.89
euros) but down 1% in euros. Oil closed at $48.35, up
2.5% from last week's $47.16 close and up 4% over the
last two weeks. The dollar lost ground again against
the euro, closing at .7650 euros or 1.3072 dollars per
euro, down 1.56%. An ounce of gold would buy 8.83 barrels
of oil on Friday down from 8.95 the week before.
An ominous, yet realistic, sense of foreboding is starting
to break through the happy talk.
Consumer
sentiment fell in February for the second straight
month, puzzling analysts who haven't been paying attention.
Bush's dilemma has always been that to maintain power,
to invade countries and to get things like Social Security
"reform" done, he has to scare people. Scaring people,
however, hurts the economy by destroying optimism.
More attention is being paid to the "inverted
yield curve" this past week, due in part to the
fact that Alan Greenspan had no explanation for it during
his congressional testimony on Thursday and that inverted
yield curves always precede recessions. An inverted
yield curve is when short-term interest rates are higher
than long-term interest rates. In other words, since
the US Federal Reserve Board began to raise interest
rates (the short-term ones) the long-term rates on ten-year
bonds (as well as longer term bonds and housing mortgage
rates) have actually gone down. This
situation almost always predicts a serious recession.
Here's what the New York Times said in an
article by Jonathan Fuerbringer:
WHEN Alan Greenspan says he cannot explain why longer-term
interest rates are so low, what's an investor to do?
Take cover.
Some money managers are doing just that because they
have had the same problem as Mr. Greenspan, the Fed
chairman: they cannot understand the decline of longer-term
rates despite six increases in short-term rates by
Fed policy makers since June.
"This development contrasts with most experience,"
Mr. Greenspan said last week in testimony to Congress.
"Other things being equal, increasing short-term
interest rates are normally accompanied by a rise
in longer-term yields."
Instead, the yield on the Treasury's 10-year note
has fallen to 4.26 percent from 4.69 percent at the
end of June 2004, despite a climb of 1.5 percentage
points in the central bank's short-term rate benchmark,
to 2.5 percent. While Mr. Greenspan cited many possible
reasons for this unusual happening, he ultimately
concluded that "it remains a conundrum."
That's enough to make Paul A. McCulley cautious.
"When the Fed chairman says he's scratching his
dome, you should be scratching yours," said Mr.
McCulley, a portfolio manager and economist at Pimco,
the asset management and mutual fund company in Newport
Beach, Calif. "You should always be wary when
the central bank says an asset price is aberrant."
Thomas H. Atteberry, a manager of the New Income
fund at First Pacific Advisors in Los Angeles, agrees.
"He's the guy who is supposed to have all the
information," Mr. Atteberry said of the Fed chairman.
"And he is telling me he doesn't know why. Why
commit capital to a long-term investment when you
don't understand why it's valued that way?"
Mr. Greenspan also acknowledged that he was puzzled
by other economic behavior. Although investors seem
willing to take on more risk, businesspeople appear
reluctant to do so. Capital investment has lagged
behind the big rise in corporate profits. And worker
productivity, a factor in restraining inflation, has
proved to be "notoriously difficult to predict,"
he said.
There were other disturbing aspects to Greenspan's
remarks. Greenspan
said to Congress on Thursday that by permitting the
further growth of federally backed mortgage companies,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, "we are placing the total
financial system of the future at a substantial risk"
[Read
full article]. That is apocalyptic language for
Greenspan. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government-chartered
companies that buy up mortgages from private lenders.
They are also privately owned by shareholders, but they
enjoy the perception by the market that they are federally
backed, since investors don't think that the government
can let them fail for social, political and economic
reasons. Since 1997, their holdings have tripled, growing
to $1.5 trillion.
Greenspan
urges cuts at Fannie, Freddie
Fed chief says $1.5 trillion mortgage portfolio will
cause problems for nation's financial system.
February 18, 2005: 9:19 AM EST
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan
Greenspan urged Congress to significantly cut the
mortgage portfolios of the big mortgage firms Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac to avoid "almost inevitable"
problems for the U.S. financial system.
Greenspan has in the past expressed concern about
the growth of the companies' mortgage holdings, saying
they could pose a risk if allowed to increase unchecked.
The Fed chairman went farther Thursday, telling members
of the House Financial Services Committee they should
require the companies to slash their mortgage holdings.
Congress is weighing tighter supervision of the mortgage
finance companies after accounting controversies and
senior management ousters at both firms in 2003 and
2004.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy home loans from lenders
and repackage them as securities for investors, but
they also retain mortgages and mortgage-backed securities
for their portfolios.
Congress chartered the shareholder-owned companies
to ensure there are plenty of funds available for
home buyers to take out mortgages.
Greenspan said in response to lawmakers' questions
that the growth of those portfolios, which together
top $1.5 trillion, primarily allows the companies
to leverage their federal charters to generate substantial
profits.
"We have found no reasonable basis for that
portfolio above very minimal needs and what I would
suggest is that for liquidity purposes they're able
to hold U.S. Treasury bills in whatever quantity they
would choose ... and a $100 billion, $200 billion,
whatever the number might turn out to be, limit on
the size of the aggregate portfolios of those institutions,"
he said.
A Freddie Mac official disagreed with Greenspan,
saying that Freddie Mac's mortgage and mortgage-security
purchases pump money into mortgage markets, lowering
costs by boosting demand and guaranteeing stability
even during unsettled periods, such as the Asian debt
crisis of 1997-1998.
"Our retained mortgage portfolio helps us fulfill
our charter purposes of providing liquidity and stability
to the U.S. residential mortgage market in good and
bad economic times," said Freddie Mac spokeswoman
Sharon McHale.
But Greenspan said congressional failure to cap the
growth of the companies' mortgage portfolios would
invite potentially serious risk. He recommended that
lawmakers pass legislation within several years requiring
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to divest a large share
of their holdings.
"Over time, several years, that should be done
because these institutions, if they continue to grow,
continue to have the low capital that they have, continue
to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios
which they need to do for interest risk diversion,
they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic
risk down the road," Greenspan said.
While there is no risk now, problems are "almost
inevitable" in the remainder of the decade if
lawmakers fail to act, he added.
"If you get large enough ... and something goes
wrong, then we have a very serious problem, because
the existing conservatorship does not create the funds
which would be needed to keep these institutions going
in the event of default, which is what the conservatorship
is supposed to do, and we have no obvious stabilizing
force within the marketplace," he said.
"Enabling these institutions to increase in
size -- and they will, once the crisis passes ...
-- we are placing the total financial system of the
future at a substantial risk," Greenspan added.
Criticisms of Greenspan's tenure as Fed chief have
grown louder in recent months. A headline for an article
at Forbes.com screams, "World
on Brink of Ruin." That is not the kind
of language publications like Forbes usually
use. Is there an effort to scare the public to cause
a crash? Or are they covering themselves because they
know it will happen soon? Here is what Forbes said about
Greenspan:
Alan Greenspan, that Matador of the Money Supply,
the esteemed Impresario of Interest Rates, has suffered
precious few slings or arrows over his many years
as chairman of the Federal Reserve. Even the White
House has had to offer its critiques off the record
for fear of roiling the markets or upsetting the chairman's
Elvis-in-Vegas-like following. So when the chief economist
of one of the world's most prestigious banks calls
Greenspan a bum, that's a big deal.
And yesterday it happened. Stephen Roach, the
chief economist for Morgan Stanley & Co.,
one of the most powerful investment banks and one
of the 50 largest companies in the world, says Greenspan
has "driven the world to the economic brink."
Writing in an upcoming issue of Foreign Policy,
Roach says that when Greenspan steps down as chairman
of the Federal Reserve next year, he will leave behind
a record foreign deficit and a generation of Americans
with little savings and mountains of debt. Americans,
Roach says, are far too dependent on the value of
their assets, especially their homes, rather than
on income-based savings; they are running a huge current-account
deficit; and much of the resulting debt is now held
by foreign countries, especially in Asia, which permits
low interest rates and entices Americans into more
debt.
Here's Marshall
Auerback:
Economists, politicians, and business executives
have repeatedly voiced unease about the imbalances
in the global financial system, which have been reflected
in the dollar's steep fall against the euro and other
currencies until recently. But most expressed skepticism
that the Bush administration would reduce the trade
and budget deficits, which have fed those imbalances.
The White House has said that it does not view these
issues as a major problem because foreigners still
view the American economy as an attractive investment,
and Mr Greenspan has recanted some of his earlier
expressed concern about the dangers of ignoring America's
mounting imbalances.
The scope of the global imbalances and the potential
for crisis makes piecemeal, orthodox solutions to
the global imbalance problem unworkable and far too
slow. The U.S. service-based economy, with more limited
economies of scale than those of newly industrializing
economies such as China, will not be able to export
its way out of the problem. The only demand left for
US goods is largely concentrated in industries such
as aerospace and high technology. But these are industries
where exports pose national security risks, particularly
if the exports are directed toward "strategic competitors"
such as China, which generally have extremely poor
records in terms of safeguarding intellectual property
rights.
As we have noted many times before, there is a danger
that over time, the US economy will find itself in
a "debt trap", with an accelerating deterioration
in its net foreign asset position and its overall
current balance of payments (as net income paid abroad
begins to explode). We have never been in a position
before where the world's leading economy has been
subject to this condition, so it is difficult to make
the case for traditional remedies, such as trade devaluation
(where the corresponding knock-on effects would invariably
create a huge international growth shock, thereby
throwing into doubt the strategy of the US achieving
net export growth). Because the US is such a vast
economy, it cannot eliminate its current account deficit
as readily as a smaller economy. When it tries
to improve its trade balance through devaluation or
through restrictive demand management, its sheer size
affects the economies of its trading partners adversely
and to an appreciable degree. Understandably, they
object and resist. When foreign economies resist dollar
devaluation and the dissipation of their current account
surpluses, the U.S. may have to raise interest rates
in order to induce creditors to continue financing
its debt build-up.
So the problem is likely to get worse, which could
ultimately lead to "solutions" that prove highly disruptive
to the existing system of multilateral trade and cooperation
which has developed over the past several generations.
A resort to out and out military force cannot ultimately
be ruled out.
If a full-blown crisis does occur, the macroeconomic
challenge would be unlike anything the United States
has faced in more than half a century. While this
would be a time of wrenching, painful change, the
new adverse circumstances might also inspire a great
shift toward radically different political solutions
than have hitherto been considered within the realm
of acceptability.
The first imperative--an unavoidable necessity--would
be to suppress consumption through credit-restraining
measures, fiscal caution or tax reform, and to stimulate
greater domestic savings, yet somehow to keep the
economy growing. If this great adjustment is left
to market forces alone, the predictable consequences
will be to punish the innocent--struggling households
and small businesses--first.
The jump-shift strategy may ultimately take the form
of a "wartime strategy" – not the phony "war on terror"
strategy invoked after the September 11, 2001 attacks
(in which Messrs O'Neill and McTeer, amongst others,
exhorted Americans to go back to the shopping malls,
to show the terrorists that they "couldn't win").
A more accurate precedent is World War II, an extraordinary
era of economic development that virtually shut down
many forms of domestic consumption (cars and housing)
while the government's spending on war production
launched major new industries (electronics, petrochemicals,
modern aircraft and many others). Essentially, accelerated
investment and forced savings replaced consumer spending
as the leading fuel for economic growth. After the
war, pent-up desires and needs became the economic
demand that drove the long postwar era of prosperity.
Of course, an important difference from the World
War II example is that it is difficult to see how
reconstruction could be financed primarily through
deficit spending, given that the country is already
burdened by growing indebtedness. This leads to the
possibility of the US repudiating its existing debt
obligations to external creditors. A decisive President
might start by bringing up a taboo subject--tariffs--and
inform the world that the United States is prepared
to impose a temporary general tariff of 10 or 15 percent
on all US imports. Every multinational would have
to rethink its industrial strategy, because some of
its production might be stranded in the wrong country.
The idea of tariffs is so alien to conventional wisdom
it probably sounds illegal. In fact, there is provision
for "temporary adjustments" under the new World Trade
Organisation rules. It is also worth noting in any
case that the legal technicalities of a global multilateral
system didn't stop Richard Nixon, who stunned the
world in 1971 when he abruptly announced a 10 percent
import surcharge, devalued the dollar and unilaterally
discarded the Bretton Woods monetary system. Nor did
it stop President Roosevelt in the 1930s, during which
he declared it illegal to own circulating gold coins,
gold bullion, and gold certificates. In essence,
the federal government forced itself into the position
by refusing to repay its bond holders in gold coin,
forcing them to accept US dollars instead. Hence,
subsequent to FDR's executive order, all holders of
such bonds were forced to accept legal tender currency
instead of "gold coin of the present standard
of value." The act of confiscating gold itself
was a violation of private property rights and was
illegal – but the taboo was broken. As author Eric
Englund notes, "[B]y not paying bondholders in gold
coin, the U.S. government has technically defaulted
on past Treasury bond obligations." Americans (and
their foreign creditors) might come to see more of
these types of actions from future American President.
It is true that such actions on the part of the US
may well provoke reactions in kind. On the other
hand, given the lack of restraint evident in the country's
current foreign policy aspirations, it is hard to
envisage that an economic response to the Americans'
abrogation of existing obligations would come without
some possibility of a robust military response (or
at least the threat of one). The US has already show
itself willing to address the problem that it does
not make enough of what the rest of the world wants
by going to war to monopolise control of the supply
and distribution of what the world needs, petroleum.
There are other war aims, of course, but control of
the global hydrocarbon net is certainly the most important.
As market strategist Chris Sanders has noted, "The
truth is that the dangerously destabilising idea has
rooted in Washington that, in the words of Vice President
Cheney, 'deficits don't matter (we proved that in
the 90s).' He is right of course in pure power
terms; a fuller expression of Cheney's dictum might
well add, 'as long as we are able to force everyone
else to accept them (deficits).'"
Already, it appears clear that the US is driven to
rely more on military adventure because the economic
house is in disarray and "overstretched".
They can't just bludgeon their way economically anymore.
They have to use the stick. Any close look at the
inauguration speech bears out the reliance on forcing
the world to conform to us dictates. Why should this
not extend ultimately to existing debt arrangements
if the US finds itself facing an Argentina-like predicament?
All these outcomes may sound quite improbable at this
moment. Certainly, the establishment would brush them
aside. But do not dismiss the possibility that dramatic
change and epic political reforms lie ahead. As we
have said many times before, Washington's elites will
not go down without a fight.
A guest commentator on PrudentBear.com, Max Fraad Wolf,
advises us not to listen to the happy talk, but to think:
Indexes drift upward pulling predictions, expectations
and your leg. It is high time to more profoundly question
the wisdom being peddled by the Fed, administration
and financial press. I strongly recommend that investors
listen less and think more.
Let's start with the basics on which most agree. 2005
will see a deceleration of S&P 500 profit growth.
US GDP growth will also likely decelerate. The consensus
2005 estimate from the Economist magazine
is for 3.5% GDP growth down from 4.4% in 2004. US
interest rates and monetary policy will remain stimulative,
but less so, as they meander toward neutrality. As
this goes to press, broad and narrow US money supply
growth is above, and interest rates are below, long
term historic norms. This can only continue if we
double dip. Huge trade and budget deficits, near or
above 2004 record levels, are a virtual certainty.
Yes, you listened to Greenspan assert that weakening
dollars will suddenly reverse a 15-year secular trend
in trade imbalances. He mentioned this as another
weak job report was issued, but didn't bother to base
his claim on any particular fundamentals. That presents
an opportunity to implement the new credo, "don't
listen, think."
If you follow this simple rule, your rose-colored
goggles will fog over as your temperature rises, and
you will be driven toward their removal. No sooner
than you slip off those worn out lenses, will you
find the following puzzling:
A merger wave seems well established. You have been
listening to stories about how this is a great omen
for stocks. Stop and start thinking. Over the past
five years we have discovered that most of the last
great merger wave's shining stars are light years
away from real enduring benefit to share holders -
from AOL- Time Warner to HP-Compaq.
Secondly, the drivers to the mega-mergers are pricing
power, competition reduction and cost cutting opportunity.
That explains much of the recent activity, and it
also signals discomfort that leading businesses have
with investment in their own industries. Amidst monetary
stimulus and hype, firms are looking to hunker down,
remove competitors, slash costs and pass along material
price increases to debt burdened consumers facing
declining market choices. In addition, several major
firms are looking to invest repatriated profits- at
the new much lower tax rates on these funds. However,
they seem disinterested in capital investment or hiring.
This is supposed to reflect a healthy environment
for stocks.
How many times is a turn in events Iraq right around
the corner? Iraq's recent vote propelled Shia religious
leaders and secessionist Kurds into dominance alongside
an apparently growing insurgency. This is not the
kind of news that rationally leads to popping corks
and fine cigars. Yes, it was nice to see that many
voted despite the credible threat of death. However,
this hardly justifies the Iraq victory premium in
the markets, let alone a further run up. Look at the
latest issue of Foreign Affairs. In it you
will find leading experts extolling their considered
"best" option, rapid withdrawal. Is it plausible
this suggests that they have been thinking, not listening
and are not impressed?
Chronic bulls simultaneously celebrating the ability
of declining dollars to overpower trade deficits and
the reassurance offered by rising dollars amid forecasts
that call for the dollar to end the year at or above
where it began. We are told variously that declining
greenbacks are helpful, trade rebalancing and likely
to reverse direction. Sounds great, but doesn't stand
up well to the application of reason. Negative balances
of trade are built into our macro economy and our
place in the global economy. These imbalances will
not substantively change unless the structure of the
US economy or the global economy does. Our earnings
are insufficient, our savings non-existent and our
demand insatiable. Our place is to borrow and spend.
Correction of the imbalances would require this to
change. Few even acknowledge that possibility, yet
they endlessly forecast either painless correction
or the sustainability of the present arrangement.
Both offer reassurance and buoy sagging spirits and
prices. Sadly, they are little more than howling gusts
of hot air Prozac. If you listen, you will feel better.
If you think you will feel worse.
US equities are not cheap and neither is the dollar.
Thankfully, this is not very widely understood. Thus,
the safety offered by the mob. To stay happily in
the game, one need only ignore reality. Look no further
than Greenspan for an impeccable role model.
Of course, you are safe in the mob until the whole
mob runs off a cliff. Better to think objectively and
face reality. |
JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia - Moves by
Middle East oil exporters and Russia to switch some
revenue from dollars to euros lie behind the U.S. currency's
weakness, and a further rise in crude prices could prompt
more declines, the billionaire investor George Soros
said on Monday.
Soros told delegates to the Jeddah Economic Forum that
the dollar's fall should help to lower the U.S current
account and trade deficits, but
warned that a fall beyond an undisclosed "tipping
point" would severely disrupt markets.
The U.S. current account deficit is more than five
percent of gross domestic product despite the currency's
three-year slide. The dollar, however, has staged a
comeback recently, gaining about 3.6 percent against
the euro and three percent versus the yen so far this
year.
"The oil exporting countries' central banks ...
have been switching out of dollars mainly into euros
and Russia also plays an important role in this. That
is, I think, at the bottom of the current weakness of
the dollar," Soros said. [...] |
We live in strange times. When fun is
equated with destruction and murder. Consider if you
will this comment summarising a personal military ethos
and directed to us by former US Marine officer Lieutenant
General James Mattis...
"It's fun to shoot some people. You go
into Afghanistan, you've got guys who slap women around
for five years because they don't wear a veil. You know,
guys like that ain't got no manhood anyway, so it's
a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."
It was this same Lieutenant General Mattis
who dismissed photographic evidence of the slaughter
by US-led forces of dozens of people at an Iraqi wedding
party last year. Among the dead
were 27 members of the extended Rakat family their wedding
guests and even the band of musicians hired to play
at the ceremony. 11 of
the dead were women. 14 were children.
In November last year Operation Phantom
obliterated the historic and beautiful city of Falluja
in Iraq the home of over 300,000 people before the merciless
onslaught by US forces. Hundreds
of thousands of children and an equal number of the
sick and the elderly have died in Iraq as a direct result
of sanctions imposed on Iraq by the United Nations.
There were no weapons of mass destruction
so Iraq constituted no threat to countries in the West.
Clearly the specific purpose
to invading Iraq was to reduce the country to third
world status and lessen its influence in the Middle
East on behalf of Israel and corporate interests across
the globe. World populations conditioned through
the media principally to accepting the basic concept
of the "enemy" and the "alien" respond in Pavlovian
fashion to such words as "evil" and "dictator" and are
correspondingly evoked into a war like mode and disposition
and as often as not this leads to a manufactured desire
for revenge.
The unrelenting remorseless media demonization
of the Serbian people and President Slobodan Milosevic
serves as exemplar without parallel of this Orwellian
consciousness controlling process.
War is an immensely
profitable enterprise for a relatively small number
of people for whom it is an absolute necessity to control
the consciousness or to put it another way annihilate
the consciousness of millions of people across the globe.
The most effective way to do this is
through sensationalism which is basically a disguised
form of sadomasochism. In short you create a desire
for and addiction to all that is sensational….
Public crucifixions were certainly sensational as were
public beheadings and hangings and gladiatorial contests.
Unquestionably all this blood letting paved the way
for an acceptance of slaughter unlimited in mass warfare.
Desensitization is the
purpose of this exercise. In this blood soaked age the
capacity to desensitize the great mass of people everywhere
is truly phenomenal.
Drugs and excessive use of alcohol and
an addiction to loveless and mechanistic style pornography
obliterating any concept of affection or consideration
for others is projected as "normal" and all that is
debased and meretricious and gratuitously violent is
daily fare on television screens across the world .
No longer are we afforded time to reflect
as we are ceaselessly besought by the deceivers and
would be manipulators of the collective consciousness
to "move forward" as we are bade quite sternly to "come
to terms with" grief and loss and the leave taking of
loved ones and matters over which we may have little
or no control but nevertheless require reflection.
Perhaps we should resist this cold blooded
imperative to live precisely in the moment as we might
perhaps challenge the martial call to "move forward"
perceiving it to be in no way concerned with our personal
or collective welfare but rather to be a directive to
conform to an ethos of a militaristic - even imperialistic
- ethos. [...] |
Newspapers from around the world
on Thursday raised accusation fingers to Israel regarding
the assassination of Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri.
Turkish "Yeni Asya" Newspaper said that
Israel is involved, directly or indirectly, in the assassination
of Hariri.
"Israel involvement in the crime is a fait accompli,
it doesn't need a fortune-teller to inform reality,"
the Newspaper added in an article published on Thursday.
In Prague, "Bravo" Newspaper said in an
analysis that the history of the Middle East tells that
Israel was behind all assassination acts which were
carried out against Arab figures.
In Paris, L'Humanite Newspaper, for its part, said
that Israel could be behind murdering Hariri, stressing
that Israel has an interest in the crime, namely to
be far away from the resumption of peace process which
Syria repeatedly called for.
Meanwhile, Deputy Kuwaiti Premier Mohammad Sharar
strongly denied involvement of any Arab party into the
killing of Hariri. "Assassinating Hariri is considered
an assassination of peace, security and stability in
Lebanon," Sharar told the UAE al-Khaleej Newspaper,
adding that settling political disputes like this way
is a condemned terrorism. |
DAMASCUS - President Bashar al-Assad
is willing to withdraw Syrian troops from neighbouring
Lebanon in line with the Taef accords that ended the
civil war there, Arab League chief Amr Mussa said.
"During our meeting, President Assad expressed
his firm desire, more than once, to continue implementing
the Taef accord and to withdraw from Lebanon in keeping
with this agreement," Mussa said after talks with
Assad in Damascus.
Syria is facing mounting pressure from the Lebanese
opposition and the international community to pull out
all its troops from Lebanon, three decades after they
were first stationed there shortly after the start of
the civil war.
"Taef and the withdrawal are part of Syrian policy.
Steps in these matters will be taken shortly,"
Mussa added. [...] |
The 300-kilo car bomb that killed
former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri in Beirut
last week is being widely blamed on Syria. The Bush
administration in the U.S., cheered on by Israel, accused
Syria of "terrorism," withdrew its ambassador
and all but threatened Damascus with war.
A Syrian role in the crime defies logic, though not
possibility. Syrian President Bashar-el-Assad's regime
is desperately seeking to avoid providing U.S. President
George W. Bush with a pretext for war and has urgently
sought improved relations with Washington.
Hariri dealt comfortably with Syria for years. Though
opposed to the continued presence of 15,000 Syrian "peacekeeping"
troops in Lebanon, Hariri was not a major threat to
Damascus. In fact, this consummate but pragmatic Levantine
politician played all sides and had enjoyed close political
and business links to Syria. Suspicion
points at Lebanon's far-rightist, anti-Syrian Maronites,
Israel's Mossad or violent Islamists. All have
an interest in destabilizing Lebanon and hurting Syria.
Other suspects include rogue elements from one of
Syria's many competing security agencies, or business
rivals of billionaire Hariri, who was a brilliant but
ruthless entrepreneur.
The professional expertise of the
bombing strongly suggests a state intelligence agency.
Hariri's murder is only the latest in at least a dozen
unsolved political assassinations in Lebanon over the
past two decades.
Desire to oust Assad
The Beirut bombing occurred
as the White House is intensifying efforts to overthrow
Syria's government. The U.S., France and the
UN Security Council are demanding that Syria pull its
troops out of Lebanon. Syrian forces had been invited
in to end Lebanon's bloody 15-year civil war.
They remained and made sure pro-Syrian politicians
ran Lebanon. Damascus refuses to pull out until Israel
withdraws its troops occupying the Golan Heights and
West Bank.
Syria has never entirely accepted Lebanese independence.
French colonialists created Lebanon out of historical
Syria to create a Maronite Christian-dominated enclave.
Washington has totally adopted
Israel's view that Syria is a dangerous threat and a
supporter of terrorists -- meaning Palestinian
resistance groups Hamas and Islamic Jihad and Lebanon's
welfare and resistance organization Hezbollah.
Israel is determined to get revenge on Hezbollah,
which defeated its attempts to turn Lebanon into an
Israeli protectorate and drove Israeli occupation forces
from Lebanon -- a small but vicious war this writer
saw firsthand.
Israeli PM Ariel Sharon's rightist
Likud Party may be renewing previous efforts to bring
Lebanon back into Israel's sphere of influence. For
the past quarter century, Syria and Israel have waged
a dirty war of bombings and assassinations to dominate
Lebanon and Jordan.
The White House is hoping its threats and economic
siege of Syria will provoke the overthrow of the Assad
regime. This strategy might work.
A fragile mosaic
Like Iraq, Syria is a fragile ethnic/religious mosaic
held together by an iron-fisted central government.
Bashar al-Assad inherited his regime in 2000 from his
father, Hafiz, a wily, ruthless general who had ruled
Syria since 1970. The younger Assad is trying to modernize,
liberalize and reform Syria but faces heavy resistance
from the Baath party's old guard, which fears too much
change, a la Gorbachev, will produce revolution.
The Assads belonged to a secretive religious sect,
the Alawi, considered heretics by Syria's majority Sunni
Muslims. Alawi make up only 10% of Syria's 17 million
people. But their dominance of the armed forces and
intelligence services allowed Assad Sr. to rule Syria
for three decades. A similar process occurred in Iraq,
where minority Sunnis held power by controlling the
army and security forces.
The elder Assad crushed numerous attempts by the Sunni
majority and Islamists to overthrow his regime. I visited
the city of Hama just after the Assad regime killed
10,000 rebelling members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Many Syrians would like to be rid of the Assad regime
and U.S.-imposed economic sanctions but fear sudden
change will produce chaos or civil war.
Israel would welcome Syria's implosion, as it did
Iraq's. Hence current Israeli efforts to press the White
House and Congress to overthrow Syria's unloved, isolated
regime, whose only ally is Iran -- itself a leading
target on America's Mideast hit list. |
To any intelligence analyst, it
should be obvious that the United States has already
embarked on a psychological warfare (psywar) campaign
to keep Iran on tenterhooks in the hope of thereby breaking
its will to resist US pressure to agree to the dismantling
of its uranium enrichment capability.
It is in this context that one has to view the rhetoric
of "no option excluded" coming at regular
intervals from President George W Bush, Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice and other US leaders, orchestrated
leaks to the media of Pakistan's cooperation with the
US in a possible covert action against Iran's military
nuclear capability, of increasing Israeli contacts with
Pakistan, of US drones (unmanned surveillance planes)
flying unhindered over Iran's nuclear establishments
from bases in Iraq, and the latest reports of a mysterious
blast near the southern port city of Dailam in Iran
on Wednesday.
Iranian leaders would be making a
serious miscalculation - as Saddam Hussein of Iraq did
- if they underestimated the determination of not only
the US, but also of Israel, to see that Iran does not
acquire a capability for the production of nuclear weapons.
It would be a serious mistake
on the part of Iranian leaders and policymakers to think
that the disastrous consequences of the US-led military
intervention in Iraq and pressure from the rest of the
world - with even the United Kingdom reportedly hesitant
to go whole hog with the United States in the case of
Iran, as it did in the case of Iraq - would deter any
US military or paramilitary action against Iran, despite
undoubted difficulties.
In its efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring any
capability that might bring a nuclear weapon within
its reach, the US has three options. The
first is military - an open military intervention,
as in Iraq, to bring about regime change and the dismantling
of Iran's nuclear capability. The Iraqi experience and
the continuing instability there, two years after the
US occupation, ought to discourage such an adventurist
course of action.
The US underestimation of the sense
of patriotism and national pride of the Iraqis is largely
responsible for the mess it has created for itself in
Iraq. The Iranians have even a much stronger sense of
patriotism and national pride than the Iraqis, and the
US would be landing in another mess if it invaded Iran.
The second
option is to do an Osirak in Iran - destroy its
nuclear establishments through clandestine action, either
from the air or the ground or both, as Israel did to
Iraq's French-aided Osirak reactor in the early 1980s.
Both the US and Israel have the capability to do so,
acting in tandem or independently of each other, but
a repeat of Osirak in Iran would be beset with serious
difficulties, the likes of which Israel did not face
in Iraq. Osirak was still under construction when Israel
attacked it and it had not yet been commissioned. Hence
Israel did not have to worry about collateral damage
to civilians and the environment in the area due to
possible radioactive leakages or other hazards. Moreover,
the French engineers working on the construction quietly
collaborated with the Israelis by remaining absent from
the construction site at the time of the bombing. This
helped minimize, if not avoid, French casualties.
In Iran, the US and Israel face two types of nuclear
establishments - those already constructed and possibly
already secretly working - and those still under construction
and yet to be commissioned. In the first category would
come the nuclear enrichment facility at Natanz and possibly
one other place. Under the second category would come
the nuclear power stations at Bushehr under construction
by the Russians, despite US pressure to stop.
A clandestine US and/or Israeli strike on the construction
sites at Bushehr should be feasible without causing
much collateral damage to Iranian civilians and the
environment. But how about the Russians employed for
the construction? Will they cooperate by remaining away
from the site at the time of the raid?
A strike against Bushehr, even if successful, would
not put an end to US concerns. The real source of concern
at present ought to be Iran's uranium-enrichment capabilities.
They would have the first priority for both the US and
Israel. Here, the dangers of incalculable
collateral damage to civilians and the environment could
be high. This ought to act as a deterrent, but if the
concerns of the US and Israel cross the limits of tolerance,
they may not hesitate to organize a raid, even at the
risk of serious collateral damage.
The third option is psywar,
utilized with the aim of breaking the Iranian will so
that the other two options become unnecessary. This
option has no unacceptable risks, but its ability to
produce the expected results is uncertain.
The US has already embarked on this option. The
psywar is being waged at two levels - the political
and the paramilitary. The political psywar, which is
democracy-centric, is directed at the Iranian people
and is being waged through Iranian dissidents in the
US and elsewhere. It aims to keep alive and aggravate
the divide between the reformists and the fundamentalist
clerics and the liberals and the conservatives in Iranian
civil society. It also seeks to exploit the already
existing pockets of alienation inside Iran - and create
more. The flow of US funds and sophisticated means of
propaganda mounted from California and Iraq play an
important role in this.
The paramilitary (covert) psywar, which is nuclear-centric,
seeks to convey a message not only to Tehran, but also
to Moscow, about the consequences of Iran pressing ahead
on the nuclear path in disregard of the concerns of
the US, other Western countries and Israel. This
psywar is being waged from bases in Iraq and Pakistan.
Its purpose is to create fear in the minds of Tehran
and Moscow about the inevitability of US paramilitary
action against Iran's nuclear establishments if they
do not see reason and give up their present obduracy.
The actions mounted by the US also seek to demonstrate
its capability for paramilitary action, if it decides
to act.
It is in this context that one has to view the reported
mysterious blast at Dailam, which is in Bushehr province.
The location of the blast is about 150 kilometers from
the site where the Russians are constructing the nuclear-power
stations.
Confusion in Tehran over the incident, which was reportedly
spectacular without causing any human casualties, is
evident from the contradictory statements emanating
from Iran on the cause of the blast.
The Associated Press news agency quoted an Iranian
Interior Ministry spokesman, Jahanbakhsh Khanjani, as
saying, "An airplane flew over Dailam today. Minutes
later, there was an explosion. But we have no reason
to say it's a hostile attack. There is a big possibility
that it was a friendly fire by mistake."
Iran's state TV al-Alam, which was the first to break
the story, said the explosion was possibly caused by
a rocket from an aircraft. Subsequently, it changed
its version and said the blast might have been the result
of an aircraft accidentally dropping its fuel tank.
Officials of Bushehr province, however, said the explosion
was connected to "geophysical exploration"
in the region, in connection with the construction of
a dam.
A spokesperson of Iran's Supreme National Security
Council said there was no incident and that people were
stirring trouble with such reports. She reportedly said
the council had declared that reports of a blast near
the nuclear plant were just part of an ongoing campaign
of psychological warfare against Iran.
Officials at the Russian Embassy in Tehran and at
the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy in Moscow - which
is overseeing construction at the Bushehr nuclear plant
- reportedly told CNN in a phone interview that there
had been no explosion at the plant area itself.
Given the normal lack of transparency in Tehran, one
may never know what really happened, but
it is quite possible that the explosion was the result
of a US air-mounted paramilitary (covert) operation
meant to demonstrate the United States' ability to carry
out such an operation without being detected and prevented
by the Iranians, and at the same time convey
a message to Tehran and Moscow of the seriousness of
US concerns over the nuclear issue and its determination
to put an end to Iran's clandestine nuclear plans.
By carrying out the strike in the same province in
which the Russians are constructing the nuclear power
stations, but away from the construction site, the Americans
could have sought to convey their message without creating
any international controversy due to human casualties
and other damage.
B Raman is additional secretary (retired), cabinet
secretariat, government of India, and currently director,
Institute for Topical Studies, Chennai, and distinguished
fellow and convener, Observer Research Foundation, Chennai
Chapter. |
President George W Bush set strict
limits on the EU's global ambitions last night, saying
that there was no need for the Franco-German goal of
forming an alternative superpower.
In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, his first
with a British newspaper since his re-election last
year, he pointedly rejected a call by Chancellor Gerhard
Schröder for Nato to be overhauled. Mr Schröder's
words have been widely interpreted as an attempt to
give the EU's fledgling foreign and military bodies
more muscle.
"I disagree," Mr Bush said. "I think
Nato is vital. Nato is a very important relationship
as far as the United States is concerned. It is one
that has worked in the past and will work in the future
just so long as there is that strong commitment to Nato."
Echoing Tony Blair's repeated calls for Europe and
America to work together, Mr Bush had emollient words
for Europe's leaders before his visit next week.
He implicitly acknowledged that
the time for the unilateralism of his first term was
over. His message next
week would be that America needed Europe on its side
and could not "spread freedom" alone.
[...] |
Moscow - Russian special forces
launched an assault on a building in the Caucasus on
Sunday, killing suspected Islamic rebels with poison
gas, Russian news agencies reported.
The situation was confused on Sunday several hours
after special forces opened up with automatic fire on
the first storey of the house in Nalchik, capital of
the Kabardino-Balkaria republic, which borders war-torn
Chechnya.
According to Ria Novosti, the forces used a "special
gas" and continued to fire at the building to distract
the men holed up inside.
They were waiting for the gas to disperse before inspecting
the whole building, Interfax said, adding that human
remains had been found in the first floor apartment.
It was not clear how many rebels had been in the building.
News agencies put the number at between three and five.
Police, special forces and armoured troop carriers
had been ranged against the building since Saturday
morning and authorities announced they were negotiating
with the rebels to give themselves up.
The public prosecutor for Kabardino-Balkaria said
the people inside were "members of illegal gangs
who had taken part in various terrorist acts and military
operations in Chechnya", Ria Novosti said.
On Saturday regional authorities said they were the
last members of a small Islamic group calling itself
Jammaat Yarmuk, decimated in a similar assault by Russian
special forces in Nalchik in January, when seven members
of the group died. |
CARACAS : Venezuelan President
Hugo Chavez threatened to suspend oil exports to the
United States if someone tries to assassinate him, adding
that US President George W. Bush would be to blame.
"If they kill me, there will be a really guilty
party on this planet whose name is the president of
the United States, George Bush," Chavez said on
his weekly radio program, "Hello, Mr. President."
"If, by the hand of the devil, those perverse
plans succeed ... forget about Venezuelan oil, Mr. Bush,"
he said.
Chavez said he was convinced that Washington was "sketching
out the assassination plans" before his Bolivarian
Revolution advances in Venezuela and Latin America.
Chavez revealed a week ago that Cuban President Fidel
Castro had warned him of a US assassination plot.
"Now, I am going to say it. Neither Fidel Castro
nor I talk nonsense.
"If something happens to me,
I blame the president of the United States," he
said.
"I will not hide. I am going to be in the streets
with you. I entrust myself to God, but I know that I
have been condemned to die," Chavez said.
"Each second of my life I will spend in the struggle
and God's will be done," he said.
Castro said on February 12: "If Chavez is assassinated,
the blame will fall on Bush.
"I say that as someone who has survived hundreds
of the empire's (assassination) plans," he said.
Chavez has also recently accused the United States
of being involved in an April 2002 coup, which removed
him from power for less than two days.
Washington has accused Chavez of being undemocratic
especially when it comes to the Venezuelan opposition,
and has more recently criticized arms purchases from
Russia and Brazil.
Venezuela is the only Latin American member of the
Organization of the Petroleum Producing Countries, and
sells about 1.5 million barrels daily to the United
States, nearly as much as Saudi Arabia.
US Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice recently called Chavez "a negative force"
in Latin America, and the State Department backed Colombia
in a recent dispute between the Caribbean neighbors
over the arrest of a Colombian rebel in Caracas by Colombian
officials without Venezuela's knowledge or consent.
"The United States knows that I have a 70 percent
(approval rating)," Chavez said. "And they
know that I am unbeatable in the 2006 elections and
that they cannot isolate us from our brother countries,
despite their blackmail attempts." |
Off goes former Father Paul Shanley
to state prison in Massachusetts for twelve to fifteen
years, convicted of "digitally raping" and
otherwise sexually abusing Paul Busa two decades ago.
Shanley's now 74; the earliest he can hope for parole
is when he's 82, at which point the DA could determine
that he is still, though frail, "a sexually dangerous
person" and should be confined for whatever years
remain. A DA in Massachusetts exercised just that option
in the case of another ex-priest, James Porter, who
was released last year after pleading guilty in 1993
to molesting twenty-eight children. At the time of his
death in February at the age of 70, Porter was in civil
confinement, with the state seeking to keep him behind
bars indefinitely.
So Shanley must know that most likely he will never
see the light of day, unless through a barred window.
He has more pressing concerns, namely the distinct possibility
that he will be murdered in prison, a hope expressed
by more than one person present at his sentencing, where
Christian compassion, always rationed in Massachusetts,
was in short supply. "I want him to die in prison,
whether it's of natural causes or otherwise. However
he dies, I hope it's slow and painful," declared
Shanley's accuser, Paul Busa, a 27-year-old firefighter,
in a written statement read in court.
The menacing words "or otherwise" were no
doubt intended to evoke the fate of John Geoghan, a
priest sent to a Massachusetts prison in 2002 for fondling
a 10-year-old. Although Geoghan was being kept in "protective
custody," he was strangled to death by a man serving
a life term for killing a gay man. There have been allegations
that prison guards were complicit in his murder. Paul
Busa's father, Richard, is a corrections officer, and
other relatives, including Paul's wife, are in Massachusetts
law enforcement.
In his written statement Busa said that Shanley "is
a founding member of NAMBLA and openly advocated sex
between men and little boys." It's this supposed
distinction, as the man who created the North American
Man Boy Love Association, that has earned Shanley his
throne in the Ninth Circle of the damned. It was one
of the credentials in his résumé as presented
in a two-and-a-half-hour PowerPoint presentation to
the press in April 2002 by Roderick MacLeish Jr., the
personal-injury lawyer representing Busa. At that presentation
MacLeish released Shanley's ample diocesan file to the
media, which hurriedly repeated MacLeish's allegations
without pausing to scrutinize
the file.
Had they done so, they would
have found nothing to buttress the claims that Shanley
founded NAMBLA, or was ever a member, or had ever advocated
sex between men and little boys, or had a thirty-year
record of child abuse complaints made against him or
a history of being moved from parish to parish.
Yet all these allegations have become the common currency
of Shanley's biography, and if guards usher a murderer
into his cell, the killer will probably have the NAMBLA
charge at the top of his mind. Shanley's defense counsel,
Frank Mondano, has said that during jury selection every
potential juror was aware of the Shanley scandal, and
what they most commonly "knew" was that Shanley
was somehow involved with NAMBLA.
When my colleague JoAnn Wypijewski began to report
on the Shanley case in 2002, the first thing she did
was read the 1,600-page diocesan file that MacLeish
had brandished. It became clear to JoAnn that in a case
that had consumed the press, most conspicuously the
Boston Globe, which ran almost daily stories on the
priest scandal for years, she seems to have been the
only reporter to have taken the trouble to look at the
church dossier.
What she found in the documents were many, many pages
of Shanley's fervent defense of homosexuality as a normal
human variation and the uproar these arguments provoked
in the Church. (Shanley, like many in his generation,
found support for his assertions in Alfred Kinsey's
1950s sex surveys.) In terms of sexual abuse, the Church
file has one complaint from the 1960s, which Shanley
denied and his superior, rightly or wrongly, determined
to be baseless; then nothing until the early 1990s,
when a few accusers imputed various abuses to the priest
dating back to the 1960s or '70s.
But nowhere was there any support
for the claim that Shanley was a founder of NAMBLA or
had attended a NAMBLA meeting; JoAnn, despite many discoveries
about Shanley's active sex life as a priest, found no
external evidence to back the charge. For her
fascinating report on Shanley, see the September/October
2004 issue of Legal Affairs and jw01292005.html.
What landed Shanley in prison
was not anything in the Church's file but the uncorroborated
"recovered memories" of one man, Paul Busa.
This case is a throwback to the early 1990s and before,
when people were put behind bars for lifetimes on the
basis of memories elicited by leading questions of psychotherapists.
Ultimately, after years of patient effort by a few journalists,
psychoanalysts, psychological researchers and advocates
for justice, "recovered memory" as a tool
of the latter-day Inquisition fell into well-deserved
disrepute. In the state that gave us Salem in the seventeenth
century and the Amiraults (all wrongly sent to prison
on charges brought by Middlesex county DA Martha Coakley)
in the twentieth, Shanley's case has reintroduced recovered
memory to the courtrooms of the twenty-first.
In Shanley's trial, prosecution witnesses would not
confirm Busa's claim that he was regularly taken from
religious-instruction classes by Shanley. Nor would
they confirm that they had ever seen the priest alone
with Busa, or had seen anything untoward in the years
1983-89, during which Busa claims abuse. These
claims were based on memories that became active in
2002, following Busa's conversation with his girlfriend
about the nearly identical recovered memories of his
friend Gregory Ford. Ford was dropped by the
prosecution in the same case, as were two others, their
stories apparently deemed by the DA too vexed for courtroom
use.
No facts relative to the charges
intruded into the courtroom; only emotion. Superior
Court Judge Stephen Neel should have dismissed the charges,
as requested by the defense. In the atmosphere of Massachusetts
it would have taken courage to do that, and truly extraordinary
courage for anyone on the jury (which included a therapist)
to have insisted that memories are not evidence, and
that there was far more than reasonable doubt in this
case. |
WASHINGTON - Intent on securing the vulnerable Arizona
border from illegal immigrant crossings, U.S.
officials are bracing for what they call a potential
new threat this spring: the Minutemen. Nearly
500 volunteers have already joined the Minuteman Project,
anointing themselves civilian border patrol agents determined
to stop the immigration flow that routinely, and easily,
seeps past federal authorities.
They plan to patrol a 40-mile stretch of the southeast
Arizona border throughout April when the tide of immigrants
crossing the U.S.-Mexico border peaks.
"I felt the only way to get something done was
to do it yourself," said Jim Gilchrist, a retired
accountant and decorated Vietnam War veteran who is
helping recruit Minutemen across the country.
"We've been repeatedly accused of being people
who are taking the law into our own hands," said
Gilchrist, 56, of Aliso Viejo, Calif. "That is
an outright bogus statement. We are going down there
to assist law enforcement." [...] |
Beijing - Two men killed four children
and seriously wounded at least eight others on Sunday
at an indoor skating rink in China's northwest region
of Xinjiang, before one of them committed suicide, state
media said.
The two unidentified men rushed into the skating rink
on the third floor of a commercial building, which houses
markets on the lower floors, and killed four children,
said Xinhua news agency, without saying how they died.
One of the assailants then jumped out of the building
and killed himself, while the other was arrested by
police.
Police were trying to determine a motive for the attack.
China has been dogged by a series of attacks on children
in the past year.
In December a man forced his way into a primary school
in northeast Jilin province and slashed 12 young children
before cutting his own throat.
In November a man stabbed eight teenagers to death
as they slept and injured four others after breaking
into a school dormitory in central Henan province.
Other recent attacks include a man with a knife and
homemade bombs targeting 28 children in a kindergarten
in east China's Suzhou city. No one was killed.
The spate of violence against children prompted the
government to issue a nationwide plan aimed at improving
security in schools and kindergartens.
Some experts have blamed the increase in violent incidents
in China, including growing cases of mass murder, on
increasing economic disparity and loosening social controls.
|
LOOGOOTEE, Ind. -- A man burst
into a trailer home Sunday and shot to death his two
children, his estranged wife and her boyfriend before
killing himself along a road in southern Indiana, police
said.
Arthur Lee Smith, 36, entered the home his estranged
wife shared with her boyfriend and shot both of them
in the head. Smith then entered a bedroom and shot his
and his wife's two children, ages 4 and 5.
Minutes after a neighbor reported the gunfire to police,
an officer confronted Smith, who was walking along a
roadway, telling him to stop.
"He just kept on walking and then pulled out a 9
mm Luger pistol, put it to his head and killed himself,''
state police Sgt. Todd Ringle said. |
HOUSTON A 52-year-old psychiatric
patient who had a heart ailment died after Harris County
constables shocked him with a stun gun.
Chief Deputy J-C Mosier says the two constables went
to the man's mother's home yesterday to serve a mental
health commitment warrant.
Mosier says the deputies used the Taser after the
man resisted their efforts to take him away.
The man continued to struggle with the deputies, but
he then started having trouble breathing.
He was taken by ambulance to a hospital -- where he
later died.
Mosier says the deputies knew the man had health problems
but were unaware of his heart ailment.
Tasers temporarily paralyze people by using two barbed
darts to deliver a 50-thousand-volt jolt.
|
Colombo - Sri Lanka's military
launched an investigation into the poisoning of 17 soldiers
on Sunday amid allegations they had been forced to eat
plastic explosives during a training exercise.
The 17 soldiers undergoing commando training were
admitted to a hospital early on Sunday, a military official
here said adding that one of them was in a critical
condition.
An initial military report suggested the men may have
handled the explosives before eating and ingested them
accidentally. But subsequently military police were
called in to probe allegations that they had been forced
to eat highly malleable C-4 type plastic explosives.
An instructor of the soldiers had fled the base in
northern Sri Lanka following the incident, a military
source said. |
Woody Creek - Hunter S. Thompson
died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound at his home in
Woody Creek on Sunday night. He was 67.
Regarded as one of the most legendary writers of the
20th century, Thompson is best known for the 1972 classic
"Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas." He is also
credited with pioneering gonzo journalism - a style
of writing that breaks tradition rules of news reporting
and is purposefully slanted.
Pitkin County Sheriff Bob Braudis, who is a close
personal friend of Thompson, confirmed the death. His
son, Juan, found him Sunday evening.
"On Feb. 20, Dr. Hunter S. Thompson took his
life with a gunshot to the head at his fortified compound
in Woody Creek, Colorado. The family will shortly provide
more information about memorial service and media contacts.
Hunter prized his privacy and we ask that his friends
and admirers respect that privacy as well as that of
his family," Juan Thompson said in a statement
released to the Aspen Daily News.
"Details and interviews may be forthcoming when
the family has had the time to recover from the trauma
of the tragedy," Braudis said in an interview from
Owl Farm, the rural Woody Creek home he moved into in
the 1960s.
Thompson grew up in Kentucky. He is married to Anita
Thompson, who grew up in Fort Collins. His son Juan
lives and works in Denver. His grandson is William Thompson.
Thompson's books include "Hell's Angels,"
"The Proud Highway" and his most recent effort,
"Hey Rube: Blood Sport, the Bush Doctrine, and
The Downward Spiral of Dumbness." |
PRINCE GEORGE, B.C. – An
elementary school in Prince George is closed Friday
for intensive cleaning, following an outbreak of Norovirus
earlier this week.
More than 80 students and several teachers at Spruceland
Elementary were away on Wednesday and Thursday with
symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. [...] |
MELBOURNE, Australia : Hundreds
of people were evacuated from an airport in Melbourne
in Australia Monday after a mystery illness struck passengers
and staff, sending nearly 30 people to hospital, officials
said.
Paramedics, firefighters and hazardous materials crews
in full protective clothing rushed to the airport after
staff in a domestic terminal began suffering nausea
and vomiting, dizziness, headaches and respiratory problems,
emergency workers said.
Hundreds of staff and passengers were evacuated from
the terminal while the emergency crews unsuccessfully
sought the source of toxic fumes believed responsible
for the symptoms, ambulance services spokesman James
Howe said.
Within five hours of the first reports of a person
feeling unwell, 29 people had been rushed from the terminal
to hospital and another eight were being treated at
the airport, he said.
Paramedics set up a field hospital outside the airport
and some two dozen ambulances were on scene to ferry
the sick to hospital. [...] |
One of the world's top researchers
investigating outbreaks of bird flu in South-East Asia
says she is extremely concerned by the scientific evidence
emerging about the virus.
Nancy Cox is the head of the flu division of the United
States Centre for Disease Control.
She says research now shows that
bird flu is capable of mutating into a form that can
spread from humans to humans.
"We found that for the 2003 virus, the virus
had actually changed its receptive binding or its ability
to bind to the receptors that are in human cells,"
she said.
"This shows that the virus can actually change
in such a way, or has actually changed in the past in
such a way, that might make it more easily transmitted
from person to person."
She also says the recent spurt of human infections
increases the likelihood that a mutant strain would
arise that could spread between humans
"It's impossible to predict what the consequences
would be. We might have a relatively mild pandemic like
we did in 1968," Dr Cox said.
"Alternatively, we could have
a relatively severe pandemic as occurred in 1918 or
perhaps even worse."
The World Health Organisation says there have been
55 confirmed cases of bird flu in humans and 42 deaths. |
KHABAROVSK, - A powerful cyclone
hitting southern Khabarovsk region, has grounded planes
and paralyzed the work of intercity and commuter buses,
the regional meteorological service reported on Sunday.
All planes from Moscow and other cities have been
diverted to Blagoveshchensk, Vladivostok and other airports
as they failed to land at Khabarovsk. Flights from Khabarovsk
have also been delayed.
All bus routes to Birobidzhan, Bikin and other cities
have been cancelled because of snowdrifts on highways.
Even commuter routes have been cancelled.
According to the meteorological service, heavy snowfalls
and gale-force winds will persist in the southern part
of the Khabarovsk region for at least another 24 hours. |
DHAKA : Eighty-one people are
confirmed dead and at least 100 more are missing after
a ferry capsized when it was hit by a cyclone overnight
near the Bangladesh capital Dhaka, police said.
Thousands of relatives, many distraught, gathered
near the scene of the tragedy to await news of missing
family members.
Some survivors contradicted the official figure for
the missing, saying up to 500 people could have been
on board.
Fire service and police divers found 44 bodies Sunday,
bringing the total number of corpses recovered to 81
after the accident in the Buriganga river on the outskirts
of Dhaka, police officer-in-charge Mustafa Ahmed told
AFP.
"Our father, two cousins and three other relatives
are dead, Five more relatives are missing," said
two brothers, both in tears, who gave their names as
Naser and Mannan. The party of 13 people had been travelling
to a wedding, they said.
Delwar Husain, 50, told AFP he saved his life by jumping
from the deck of the boat, although his 20-year-old
daughter Beauty died.
"It was very crowded. There were more than 400
on board, I think. There were heavy winds and the ferry
lurched and then I think it was hit by a trawler.
"It was chaos. I lost my daughter. Then I jumped
and swam to the shore," he said.
Another survivor, Shahidul Islam, 45, said he had
identified the body of his brother-in-law. "I think
there were between 450 and 500 passengers on the launch,"
he said.
"The wind came out of nowhere. I tried to hold
my brother-in-law's hand as I jumped but it was dark
and everything was confused and he got lost."
Police said they believed about 200 people were on
board the boat, the MV Maharaj.
The accident happened at Pagla Bazar when the ferry
was caught in a pre-monsoon cyclone while sailing from
the capital to the central town of Chandpur.
"Some of the passengers who survived said that
it capsized immediately after the cyclone hit, trapping
them inside," said traffic inspector Mohiuddin,
from the Dhaka Ferry Terminal.
The vessel was registered as having 167 people on
board, he said, but the true number could be higher
as ferries in Bangladesh are often overcrowded. [...]
|
SRINAGAR, India : At least 41
people have been killed in Indian Kashmir after the
heaviest snowfall in two decades brought life in the
region to a near-halt, officials and witnesses said.
Sixteen bodies were recovered from two villages hit
by an avalanche near a mountain tunnel about 100 kilometres
(62 miles) south of Srinagar, Kashmir's summer capital,
an army spokesman said.
About 40 people were missing from the villages and
army teams with sniffer dogs were searching for survivors,
Lieutenant Colonel V.K. Batra said.
Earlier in the day, 11 bodies were recovered after
an avalanche hit Loren village in southern Poonch district,
police said, while 12 deaths were reported overnight
from similar snow-related accidents in Doda, Udhampur,
Srinagar and Budgam district.
Two people were killed in a house collapse in Dras
district.
This takes the death toll in two weeks of heavy snow
to 69, including 19 soldiers. [...] |
LOS ANGELES -- A Pacific storm
that came ashore Saturday produced tornadoes near San
Diego as it made its way inland.
One twister struck at about 9:15 a.m. in the town
of Fallbrook. It gathered momentum as it headed northeast,
National Weather Service Meteorologist Philip Gonsalves
said.
An hour later, a tornado was reported near the Riverside
County line. Buildings were damaged and powerlines were
knocked down, Gonsalves said.
A tornado was also reported in Temecula, where there
were reports of animals injured, Gonsalves said.
Almost 400 lost power due to that tornando, San Diego
Gas & Electric spokesperson Anne Silva said.
Power had been restored to all but 130 customers by
1:30 p.m. she said.
More rain is on its way to Southern California and
the San Diego area, putting homeowners in mudslide-prone
areas on high alert. |
PORT BLAIR, India : The tsunami-lashed
Andaman and Nicobar Islands have suffered 9,500 aftershocks
since an undersea earthquake December 26 sent giant
waves crashing into the emerald green archipelago, India's
top geologist said.
But K.N. Mathur, director-general of the Geological
Survey of India, said the tremors were incapable of
triggering tsunamis similar to those that claimed at
least 288,800 lives in 11 countries in Asia and Africa.
"There's still large-scale panic among the islanders
of Andaman and Nicobar and we want to assure them there's
no cause for alarm," the geologist told AFP on
a visit to the Andaman's tsunami-ravaged capital of
Port Blair that wound up Friday.
Authorities have reported an exodus of hundreds of
islanders fleeing this tropical paradise for mainland
India, petrified of the aftershocks.
"Since January 6 when my department installed
five seismographs in different places of the Andamans,
we recorded 9,500 aftershocks," the government
scientist said.
The chain of Indian-administered islands spans the
seas from Myanmar to Indonesia.
"This is a normal pattern and should not be mistaken"
as a signal of a new earthquake, Mathur said. [...] |
Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|