|
P
I C T U R E O F T H E D
A Y
A
Genuine Fake Reporter
Just a few months ago, we watched
a clip from the CNN show Crossfire when comedian Jon
Stewart was a guest. The segment in which Stewart accused
shows like Crossfire of "hurting America"
is now pretty much famous. Shortly thereafter, CNN announced
that it would be cutting ties with Crossfire host Tucker
Carlson in addition to canceling the show itself.
What is so interesting about that whole scenario is
that CNN could hardly be considered an "objective"
source of information on the state of the world - or
anything else, for that matter. Comedian Stewart, on
the other hand, often cuts right through the lies and
BS and presents the viewer with a funny and fairly accurate
take on current events.
CNN mindlessly repeats and pushes upon the American
public the same White House deceptions that other US
media organizations seem to love so much. Missing is
any real analysis or commentary on the "story behind
the story". According to CNN, the war on terror
is exactly what Bush says it is. 9/11 happened exactly
the way that Bush said it happened. CNN never seriously
mentions or investigates things like the P3nt4gon Str!ke,
Israeli spies in the US, or the unusual collapse of
the WTC towers - even those that weren't hit by airplanes
- that seemed to coincide with as-yet unexplained seismic
activity at the site.
These days, the lies are piled so deep on topics such
as Iraq that the US media conveys more fiction than
fact to the American public each day. Most news networks
appear to be getting worse, with FOX leading with the
highest propaganda index. In the article Frank
Rich: Operation Iraqi Infoganda, we learn that this
downward slide of the news in the US has other interesting
components and effects:
This phenomenon has been good news for the Bush administration,
which has responded to the growing national appetite
for fictionalized news by producing a steady supply
of its own. Of late it has gone so far as to field
its own pair of Jayson Blairs, hired at taxpayers'
expense: Karen Ryan and Alberto Garcia, the "reporters"
who appeared in TV "news" videos distributed
by the Department of Health and Human Services to
local news shows around the country. The
point of these spots - which were broadcast whole
or in part as actual news by more than 50 stations
in 40 states - was to hype the new Medicare prescription-drug
benefit as an unalloyed Godsend to elderly voters.
They are part of a year-plus PR campaign, which, with
its $124 million budget, would dwarf in size most
actual news organizations.
When one real reporter, Robert Pear of The Times,
blew the whistle on these TV "news" stories
this month, a government spokesman defended them with
pure Orwell-speak: "Anyone who has questions
about this practice needs to do some research on modern
public information tools." The government also
informed us that Ms. Ryan was no impostor but an actual
"freelance journalist." The Columbia Journalism
Review, investigating further, found that Ms.
Ryan's past assignments included serving as a TV shill
for pharmaceutical companies in infomercials plugging
FluMist and Excedrin. Given that drug companies
may also be the principal beneficiaries of the new
Medicare law, she is nothing if not consistent in
her journalistic patrons. But she is a freelance reporter
only in the sense that Mike Ditka would qualify as
one when appearing in Levitra ads.
As for the mystery of Alberto Garcia's journalistic
bonafides, it remains at this writing unresolved.
His reporting career has not
left a trace on any data bank. Perhaps he is
the creation of Stephen Glass, the serial fantasist
who once ruled the pages of The New Republic.
Back at Comedy Central, Jon Stewart was ambivalent
about the government's foray into his own specialty,
musing aloud about whether he should be outraged or
flattered. One of his faux correspondents, though,
was outright faux despondent. "They
created a whole new category of fake news - infoganda,"
Rob Corddry said. "We'll never be able
to keep up!" But Mr. Corddry's
joke is not really a joke. The more real journalism
declines, the easier it is for such government infoganda
to fill the vacuum. [...]
Keeping this excerpt in mind, watch this
CNN interview with Gannon/Guckert in which the fake
reporter is grilled by the "real" CNN journalist.
Well, gee, didn't that all sound familiar?
The CNN anchor also seemed rather enthusiastic to fry
Guckert up nice and crispy, thereby distancing "real"
CNN reporters from the likes of Guckert, Ryan, and Garcia.
On the other hand, in the following article, we discover
that another more well-known CNN reporter was far kinder
to Guckert. It is also interesting how it was the "fake
media" in the form of bloggers who broke the Guckert
story, and CNN is only playing catch-up - or is that
patch-up?
Fake reporters, fake journalism, nonexistent credentials...
It looks like "Gannongate" is certainly not
an isolated incident. And the incident is certainly
not what the White House would like us to believe...
And so, today we take a look at the Real Fake Media
in the US, starting with another look at the story that
Bush and Rove would like to see buried as quickly as
possible.
|
NEW YORK - The prayers of those
hoping that real television news might take its cues
from Jon Stewart were finally answered on Feb. 9, 2005.
A real newsman borrowed a technique from fake news to
deliver real news about fake news in prime time.
Let me explain.
On "Countdown," a nightly news hour on MSNBC,
the anchor, Keith Olbermann, led off with a bit in the
classic style of Stewart's classic "Daily Show":
a rapid-fire montage of sharply edited video bites illustrating
the apparent idiocy of those in Washington. In this
case, the eight clips stretched over a year in the White
House briefing room - from February 2004 to late last
month - and all featured a reporter named "Jeff."
In most of them, the White House
press secretary, Scott McClellan, says "Go ahead,
Jeff," and "Jeff" responds with a softball
question intended not to elicit information but to boost
President George W. Bush and smear his political opponents.
In the last clip, "Jeff" is quizzing the president
himself, in his first post-inaugural press conference
of Jan. 26. Referring to Harry Reid and Hillary Rodham
Clinton, "Jeff" asks, "How are you going
to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves
from reality?"
If we did not live in a time when the news culture itself
is divorced from reality, the story might end there:
"Jeff," you'd assume, was a lapdog reporter
from a legitimate, if right-wing, news organization
like Fox, and you'd get some predictable yuks from watching
a compressed video anthology of his kissing up to power.
But as Olbermann explained, "Jeff
Gannon," the star of the montage, was a newsman
no more real than a "Senior White House Correspondent"
like Stephen Colbert on "The Daily Show."
Yet the video broadcast by Olbermann
was not fake. "Jeff" was in the real White
House, and he did have those exchanges with the real
McClellan and the real Bush.
"Jeff Gannon's" real name is James Guckert.
His employer was a Web site called Talon News, staffed
mostly by volunteer Republican activists. Media Matters
for America, the liberal press monitor that has done
the most exhaustive research into the case, discovered
that Talon's "news" often consists of recycled
Republican National Committee and White House press
releases, and its content frequently overlaps with another
partisan site, GOPUSA, with which it shares its owner,
a Texas delegate to the 2000 Republican convention.
Nonetheless, for nearly two years
the White House press office had credentialed Guckert,
even though, as Dana Milbank of The Washington Post
explained on Olbermann's show, he "was representing
a phony media company that doesn't really have any such
thing as circulation or readership."
How this happened is a mystery that has yet to be solved.
"Jeff" has now quit Talon News not because
he and it have been exposed as fakes but because of
other embarrassing blogosphere revelations linking him
to sites like hotmilitarystud9.com and to an apparently
promising career as an X-rated $200-per-hour "escort."
But it shouldn't distract from
the real question - that is, the real news - of how
this fake newsman might be connected to a White House
propaganda machine that grows curiouser by the day.
Though McClellan told Editor & Publisher magazine
that he didn't know until recently that Guckert was
using an alias, Bruce Bartlett, a White House veteran
of the Reagan-Bush I era, wrote on the nonpartisan journalism
Web site Romenesko that "if
Gannon was using an alias, the White House staff had
to be involved in maintaining his cover." (Otherwise,
it would be a rather amazing post-9/11 security breach.)
By my count, "Jeff Gannon"
is now at least the sixth "journalist"to have
been a propagandist on the payroll of either the Bush
administration or a barely arms-length ally like Talon
News while simultaneously appearing in print or broadcast
forums that purport to be real news. Of these
six, two have been syndicated newspaper columnists paid
by the Department of Health and Human Services to promote
the administration's "marriage" initiatives.
The other four have played real newsmen on TV. Before
Guckert and Armstrong Williams, the talking head paid
$240,000 by the Department of Education, there were
Karen Ryan and Alberto Garcia. Let us not forget these
pioneers - the Woodward and Bernstein of fake news.
They starred in bogus reports pretending to "sort
through the details" of the administration's Medicare
prescription-drug plan in 2004. Such
"reports," some
of which found their way into news packages distributed
to local stations by CNN,
appeared in more than 50 news broadcasts around the
country and have now been deemed illegal "covert
propaganda" by the Government Accountability Office.
The money that paid for both the Ryan-Garcia news packages
and the Armstrong Williams contract was siphoned through
the same huge public relations firm, Ketchum Communications,
which itself filtered the funds through subcontractors.
A new report by Congressional Democrats finds that Ketchum
has received $97 million of the administration's total
$250 million PR kitty, of which the Williams
and Ryan-Garcia scams would account for only a fraction.
We have yet to learn precisely where the rest of it
ended up.
Even now, we know that the fake
news generated by the six known shills is only a small
piece of the administration's overall propaganda effort.
Bush wasn't entirely joking when he called the notoriously
meek March 6, 2003, White House press conference on
the eve of the Iraq invasion "scripted" while
it was still going on. Everything
is scripted.
There were the pre-fab "Ask President Bush"
town hall-style meetings during last year's campaign.
A Pentagon Office of Strategic Influence, intended to
provide propagandistic news items, some of them possibly
false, to foreign news media was shut down in 2002 when
it became a political liability. But much more quietly,
another Pentagon propaganda arm, the Pentagon Channel,
has recently been added as a free channel for American
viewers of the Dish Network.
It is a brilliant strategy. When
the Bush administration isn't using taxpayers' money
to buy its own fake news, it does everything it can
to shut out and pillory real reporters who might tell
Americans what is happening in what is, at least in
theory, their own government.
Conservatives, who supposedly deplore postmodernism,
are now welcoming in a brave new world in which it's
a given that there can be no empirical reality in news,
only the reality you want to hear (or they want you
to hear). For a case in point, you needed only
switch to CNN on the day after Olbermann did his fake-news-style
story on the fake reporter in the White House press
corps.
"Jeff Gannon" had decided to give an exclusive
TV interview to a sober practitioner of real news, Wolf
Blitzer. Given this journalistic
opportunity, the anchor asked questions almost as soft
as those "Jeff" himself had asked in the White
House. Blitzer didn't question Guckert's outrageous
assertion that he adopted a fake name because "Jeff
Gannon is easier to pronounce and easier to remember."
(Is "Jeff" easier to pronounce than his real
first name, Jim?) Blitzer never questioned Gannon/Guckert's
assertion that Talon News "is a separate, independent
news division" of GOPUSA.
The "real" news from CNN was no news at all,
but it's not as if any of its competitors did much better.
The "Jeff Gannon" story got less attention
than another media frenzy - that set off by the veteran
news executive Eason Jordan, who resigned from CNN after
speaking recklessly at a panel discussion at Davos,
where he apparently implied, at least in passing, that
American troops deliberately targeted reporters. Is
the banishment of a real newsman for behaving foolishly
at a bloviation conference in Switzerland a more pressing
story than that of a fake newsman gaining years of access
to the White House (and network TV cameras) under mysterious
circumstances? As Olbermann demonstrated when
he borrowed a sharp "Daily Show" tool to puncture
the "Jeff Gannon" case, the only road back
to reality may be to fight fake with fake.
|
Now that is has been discovered
that "Jeff Gannon" (real name James D. Guckert),
a "reporter" for Talon News Service, a front
operation run by the conservative Republican-oriented
GOPUSA.com, was using an alias as a cleared White House
reporter, details are emerging that threaten to immerse
the Bush administration in a major scandal.
"Gannongate," which is only now being mentioned
by the mainstream news media, threatens to expose a
potentially damaging GOP pedophile and male prostitution
ring dating back to the 1980s and the administration
of George H. W. Bush. James D. Guckert, using the name
Jeff Gannon and possibly other aliases, was also running
gay porn sites, one with a U.S. Marine Corps theme that
solicited males for prostitution.
White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said he
did not realize Gannon was using an alias until recently.
However, rumors in the gay community are circulating
about McClellan frequenting gay bars in Austin, Texas.
Gannon bypassed established Secret Service security
controls, including a background check requiring a social
security number, to obtain a White House press pass
that identified him by an alias, an action seen by many
seasoned Washington journalists as only being possible
if he had favorable treatment from White House staff,
especially McClellan and his predecessor, Ari Fleischer.
One White House reporter expressed
revulsion over the fact that it was Fleischer who took
away press credentials from the late long-time White
House correspondent Sarah McClendon and handed them
to Gannon.
GOPUSA.com is run by a right-wing Texan and Bush friend
named Bobby Eberle. In 2003, GOPUSA.com launched a vicious
anti-Semitic attack against international financier
George Soros, a leading philanthropist for progressive
causes and a major contributor to the Democratic Party.
In 2003, Gannon was reportedly given access by White
House staff to a classified State Department Bureau
of Intelligence and Research memorandum regarding a
CIA meeting involving the dispatch of former U.S. Ambassador
Joseph Wilson to Niger to investigate claims, which
turned out to be false, that Iraq had attempted to procure
yellowcake uranium from the West African country. The
Wilson case ultimately led to a leak to the media by
unnamed White House staff of Wilson's wife's name and
identity as a covert CIA agent.
It was also revealed that Jeffgannon.com
had been registered by the same Delaware-based company
that had registered other Republican-oriented web sites,
along with those catering to pornographic military gay
themes and male escort services.
TalonNews.com and GOPUSA.com are both registered to
Endeavor Media Group LLC, operating from Post Office
Box 891354 in Houston, Texas. The phone number provided
is 999-999-9999. The registrant for a series of web
sites, including Jeffgannon.com, Theconservativeguy.com,
Exposejessejackson.com, Militaryescorts.com, militaryescortsm4m.com,
and hotmilitarystud.com is Bedrock Corporation of 4001
Kennett Pike in Wilmington, Delaware. Bedrock is owned
by Jim Guckert, the apparent real identity of Jeff Gannon.
The administrative contact for Bedrock was listed as
"J. Daniels," possibly another alias.
After the Gannon story broke, militaryescorts.com and
hotmilitarystud.com were redirected to a secure log-in
site at Cupertino, California-based www.dividezero.net/,
which was registered to GKG.Net, which had a contact
email in College Station, Texas, the home of Texas A&M
University and the George H.W. Bush presidential library.
Dividezero.net had a secure log-in window but no subscription
information. Experts who track illegal content on the
web, including child pornography, report that such sites
are common where log-in information is provided separately
by regular mail so that the identities of subscribers
cannot be easily tracked by online enrollment and entry
of credit card information.
Gannongate is reminiscent of a huge political scandal
that surfaced in Nebraska in 1989 when it was learned
that Lawrence King, the head of Franklin Community Credit
Union in Omaha and a rising African American star in
the GOP (he sang the national anthem at George H. W.
Bush's 1988 nominating convention in New Orleans), was
a kingpin—along with top Republicans in Nebraska
and Washington, DC, including George H. W. Bush—in
a child prostitution and pedophilia scandal. King was
later convicted and jailed for fraud but pedophile and
prostitution charges were never brought against him
and other Nebraska Republican businessmen and politicians.
The scandal, investigated by
Nebraska State Senator Loran Schmit, his assistant John
DeCamp (a former GOP state senator), State Senate Committee
investigator Gary Caradori, and former CIA Director
William Colby, reached the very top echelons of the
George H. W. Bush administration and GOP. Child
prostitutes from Boys Town and other orphanages in Nebraska
as well as children procured from China were reportedly
flown to Washington for sexcapades with Republican politicians.
GOP lobbyist Craig Spence and a number of GOP officials
in the administration and Congress were implicated in
the scandal, including Labor Secretary Elizabeth Dole's
liaison to the White House. Young
male members of the military in Washington, DC, were
particularly sought after by the prostitution ring.
During the early 1980s, a number of naval officers were
implicated in a child pornography ring that extended
from Oregon to the San Francisco Bay area and to Chicago
and Washington, DC. The story about that ring was covered
up by then-Secretary of the Navy John Lehman.
The Nebraska pedophile scandal
was similarly covered up on orders from the highest
levels of power in the senior Bush White House.
Caradori and his young son were
killed in a suspicious plane crash in Illinois in 1990.
Colby was found floating dead in the Chesapeake Bay,
near his home, in 1996. Craig Spence allegedly committed
suicide in 1989. Witnesses, many of whom were
abused themselves, were intimidated and subsequently
jailed in Nebraska and the investigation of the pedophile
scandal eventually collapsed. The entire military aspect
of the King-Spence scandal is now being repeated in
Washington in Gannongate.
Last year, a senior source on the Washington
Times editorial staff (the same paper that broke the
GOP pedophile scandal in 1989) linked White House Deputy
Chief of Staff Karl Rove to gay activities involving
top Republican political strategists in Washington,
DC.
Gannon (Guckert) has been a major player in GOP and
fundamentalist Christian politics in Washington and
around the country. In 2004, "Jeff Gannon"
was a featured speaker at a Capitol Hill Bible reading
sponsored by anti-abortion Operation Rescue head Reverend
Rob Schenk. [...]
Gannon hosted a web-based radio program called "Jeff
Gannon's Washington," broadcast on his own web
site, Jeffgannon.com, and Righttalk.com, a conservative
GOP site whose registrant is based in Watsonville, California.
Gannon's only journalism credentials were his attendance
at a two-day seminar at the Leadership Institute's Broadcast
School of Journalism in Arlington, Virginia. The head
of the Leadership Institute is Morton Blackwell, a former
Reagan administration official and a one-time head of
the College Republicans, a post that Karl Rove also
filled.
Gannon seemed particularly interested in South Dakota
politics. GOP Senate candidate John Thune appeared on
Gannon's radio webcast program. On February 4, 2004,
while being served softball questions by Gannon, Thune
called Daschle an "obstructionist and antagonist
to President Bush." [...]
Gannon was also wired into the
neo-conservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI).
He wrote a pro-Iraq war article for the March 1, 2004,
issue of their magazine, American Enterprise. AEI employs
such ardent neo-conservative figures as Richard
Perle, Michael Ledeen, and Lynne Cheney. Ironically,
many of Gannon's articles were anti-gay rights, such
as one that insinuated that John Kerry's "pro-homosexual
platform" would make him the nation's "first
gay president."
Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative
journalist, author, and columnist. He is the author
of the forthcoming book, "Jaded Tasks: Big Oil,
Black Ops & Brass Plates" and wrote "Genocide
& Covert Operations in Africa: 1993-1999" (Mellen
Press). |
WASHINGTON - Karl Rove took a victory
lap at an SRO lunch at the Conservative Political Action
Committee meeting at the Ronald Reagan building in Washington
on Thursday. After a glowing introduction by Wayne LaPierre
of the National Rifle Association, Rove proclaimed "conservatism
as the dominant political creed in America," but
warned Republicans not to get complacent or grow "tired
and timid." He recalled the dark days when the
Democrats were dominant and cautioned that that could
happen again if they let down their guard. The new White
House deputy chief of staff also called on conservatives
to "seize the mantle of idealism."
Tired and timid are two adjectives never applied to
Rove. The architect of the Bush victories in 2000 and
2004 came through the ranks of college Republicans with
the late Lee Atwater, and their admitted and alleged
dirty tricks are the legends many young political operatives
dream of pulling off. So when Jeff Gannon, White House
"reporter" for Talon "News," was
unmasked last week, the leap to a possible Rove connection
was unavoidable. Gannon says that he met Rove only once,
at a White House Christmas party, and Gannon is kind
of small potatoes for Rove at this point in his career.
But Rove's dominance of White House
and Republican politics, Gannon's aggressively partisan
work and the ease with which he got day passes for the
White House press room the past two years make it hard
to believe that he wasn't at least implicitly sanctioned
by the "boy genius." Rove, who rarely gave
on-the-record interviews to the MSM (mainstream media),
had time to talk to GOPUSA, which owns Talon.
GOPUSA and Talon are both owned by Bobby Eberle, a
Texas Republican and business associate of conservative
direct-mail guru Bruce Eberle who says that Bobby is
from the "Texas branch of the Eberle clan."
Bobby Eberle told The New York Times that he created
Talon to build a news service with a conservative slant
and "if someone were to see 'GOPUSA,' there's an
instant built-in bias there." No kidding.
Some of the real reporters in
the White House pressroom were apparently annoyed at
Gannon's presence and his softball, partisan questions,
but considered him only a minor irritant. One
told me he thought of Gannon as a balance for the opinionated
liberal questions of Hearst's Helen Thomas. But what
Gannon was up to was not just writing opinion columns
or using a different technique to get information. He
was a player in Republican campaigns and his work in
the South Dakota Senate race illustrates the role he
played. It is also a classic example
of how political operatives are using the brave new
world of the Internet and the blogosphere. Gannon and
Talon News appear to be mini-Drudge reports; a "news"
source which partisans use to put out negative information,
get the attention of the bloggers, talk radio and then
the MSM in a way that mere press releases are unable
to achieve. [...] |
The White House press room has
often been a cockpit of intrigue, duplicity and truckling.
But nothing challenges the most recent scandal there.
The latest incident began with a sequence of questions
for President Bush at his January 26 press conference.
First, he was asked whether he approved of his administration's
payments to conservative commentators. Government contracts
had been granted to three pundits, who had tried to
keep the funding secret. "There needs to be a nice,
independent relationship between the White House and
the press," said the president as he called swiftly
on his next questioner.
Jeff Gannon, Washington bureau chief of Talon News,
rose from his chair to attack Democrats in the Congress.
"How are you going to work - you said you're going
to reach out to these people - how are you going to
work with people who seem to have divorced themselves
from reality?"
For almost two years, in the daily White House press
briefings Gannon had been called upon by press secretary
Scott McClellan to break up difficult questioning from
the rest of the press. On Fox
News, one host hailed him as "a terrific Washington
bureau chief and White House correspondent".
Gannon was frequently quoted
and highlighted as an expert guest on rightwing radio
shows. But who was Gannon? [...]
His real name, it turned out, is James Dale Guckert.
He has no journalistic background whatsoever. His
application for a press credential to cover the Congress
was rejected. But at the
White House the press office arranged for him to be
given a new pass every single day, a deliberate evasion
of the regular credentialing that requires an FBI security
check. [...]
Thus a phony journalist, planted by a Republican organisation,
used by the White House press secretary to
interrupt questions from the press corps, protected
from FBI vetting by the press office, disseminating
smears about its critics and opponents, some
of them gay-baiting, was unmasked not only as a hireling
and fraud but as a gay prostitute, with
enormous potential for blackmail.
The Bush White House is the most opaque - allowing
the least access for reporters - in living memory. Every
news organisation has been intimidated, and reporters
who have done stories the administration finds discomfiting
have received threats about their careers. The
administration has its own quasi-official state TV network
in Fox News; hundreds of rightwing radio shows, conservative
newspapers and journals and internet sites coordinate
with the Republican apparatus.
Inserting an agent directly into the White House press
corps was a daring operation. Until his exposure, he
proved useful for the White House. But the longer-term
implication is the Republican effort to sideline an
independent press and undermine its legitimacy. "Spin"
seems quaint. "In this day
and age," said press secretary McClellan, waxing
philosophical about the Gannon affair, "when you
have a changing media, it's not an easy issue to decide
or try to pick and choose who is a journalist."
It is not that the White House press secretary cannot
distinguish who is or is not a journalist;
it is that there are no journalists, just the gaming
of the system for the concentration of power. |
It is quite obvious who "Jeff
Gannon" is, he is an artificial construct of the
modern, corporate media talking head. Of the (mostly)
young and beautiful "news" reciters who greet
America every night with plastic smiles, perpetually
recycled humor, and "insightfully" insipid
commentary, they are ALL Jeff
Gannons.
Unfortunately for male prostitute James Guckert, the
neo-con handlers he contracted to work for were entirely
too amateurish, AND THAT is why he got caught, because
the blackmail info they had on him was entirely too
traceable by anybody else with just a few extra internet-related
brain cells ... or perhaps, just
maybe, J. Guckert/Gannon's outing was entirely intentional.
As the expanding Terror-war in Iraq and Afghanistan
increasingly becomes more dangerous to even minimal
prosperity in America (not to mention threatening human
species survival), more and more
talking heads are beginning to look entirely too uncomfortable
shilling out the same old propaganda lies every night.
Because of this, the war hard-on neo-cons of America
have perceived the need for a very well advertised and
practical example of what WILL happen to a shill when
HIS(/her) dirty little secret is "outed."
WHENEVER a charlatan is telling blatant lies, to be
at least minimally successful, he has to at least look
like he believes what's being regurgitated. Rest
assured, the whore talking heads of America's network
news now have a fresh cause to really get into "acting
the part."
And ALL OF THEM have some well documented dark, dirty
little secret THAT
-- upon being well advertised in the public domain --
WILL destroy their lives if they EVER stand up to their
bosses, causing it to be outed. THIS is solely why their
corporate bosses have hired them.
As people with a secret past who are forever intended
to be NOTHING MORE than "newsinfotainment"
whores.
Dan |
Nation’s largest newspapers
play down a thousand pages of evidence of new torture
The Washington Post, apparently jaded by month after
month of reports of torture of Iraq, Afghan, and prisoners
held by Americans in various other countries, relegated
a thousand pages
of new torture documents to page A-16 of Friday’s
paper. [...]
The New York Times also dumped the
story deep into the A-section, with a meager 633
words. |
"Flat out lies should be confronted"
- Bill O'Reilly; Fox News Channel; May 22, 2003
Since the Iraq conflict began on March 20, Fox News
has been on a mission to legitimize it. One problem
for Fox's protracted apologia is that despite promises
of evidence of current weapons of mass destruction (WMDs)
by the Bush Administration, the evidence has been ambiguous
at best. Unfortunately for the network, I’ve been
keeping a scratch diary of their reports since the war
began.
Keep in mind that in the first three weeks of March,
before the bombs started officially dropping, Fox
was spreading all sorts of Pentagon propaganda.
Iraq had "drones" that
it could quickly dispatch to major U.S. metropolitan
areas to spread biological agents. Saddam was handing
out chemical weapons to the Republican guard to use
against coalition troops in a last-ditch red-zone ring
around Baghdad. Given what we now know about Iraq, these
reports seem to be laughable fantasies, but they were
effective in securing public backing for the war.
The following is a short chronicle of lies, propagation
of lies, exaggerations, distortions, spin, and conjecture
presented as fact. My comments are in brackets [ ]s.
March 14: On The Fox
Report anchor Shepard Smith reports that Saddam is planning
to use flood water as a weapon by blowing up dams and
causing severe flood damage.
March 19: Fox anchor
Shepard Smith reports that Iraqis are planning to detonate
large stores of napalm buried deep below the earth to
scorch coalition forces. Fox Military Analyst Major
Bob Bevelacqua states that coalition forces will drop
a MOAB on Saddam's bunker [!!] and give him the "Mother
of All Sunburns."
[After my last article, one sniveling neocon after
another wrote me to tell me I was unqualified to assess
defense matters because I wasn't a "defense analyst"
(never mind that the article wasn't on the war, and
the "real" defense experts made one wrong
prediction after another on this war). It's interesting
how these sniveling Frumsters cheer on the college-uneducated
Hannity and Limbaugh when they make defense analyses
supporting the neocon view. I do know enough to say
that the informed Bevelacqua's suggestion that a MOAB
would be used on a bunker was puzzling to say the least
(given the reports of less-than-dazzling performance
of daisy cutters outside caves in Tora Bora). Anyway,
later reports confirmed that GBU-28 bunker busters were
used during The Decapitation That Apparently Failed.]
March 23: The network
begins 2 days of unequivocal assertions that a 100-acre
facility discovered by coalition forces at An Najaf
is a chemical weapons plant. Much is made about the
fact that it was booby trapped. A former UN weapons
inspector interviewed on camera over the phone downplays
the WMD allegations and says that booby-trapping is
common. His points are ignored as unequivocal charges
of a chemical weapons facility are made on Fox for yet
another day (March 24). Only weeks later is it briefly
conceded that the chemicals definitively detected at
the facility were pesticides.
[Jennifer Eccleston has to be the worst reporter employed
by any network. She began one segment with a "Hi
there!" – in no response to any segue from
the relaying anchor at Fox headquarters in New York.
Her bangs are long and constantly blowing in her face
in the wind. Her head wobbles from side to side with
her nose tracing out a figure 8 all the while arbitrarily
syncopating a monotone voice with overemphasis on the
last syllables of different words (e.g., Bagh-DAD’).
The old, white-haired flag-waving yahoos like her not
for her professionalism – she has none –
but because of her innocent Britney Spearsesque beauty;
i.e., she's a typical young piece of meat which dirty
old men with too much time on their hands fantasize
about.]
March 24: Oliver North
reports that the staff at the French embassy in Baghdad
are destroying documents. [How could he know this?]
March 24: Fox and Friends.
Anchor Juliet Huddy asks Colonel David hunt why coalition
forces don't "blow up" Al Jazeera TV. [The
context of the discussion makes it clear that she doesn't
know the difference between Al Jazeera and Iraqi TV!!!!
Juliet Huddy is a beautiful woman but not very bright.]
March 28: Repeated assertions
by Fox News anchors of a red ring around Baghdad in
which Republican Guard forces were planning to use chemical
weapons on coalition forces. A Fox "Breaking News"
flash reports that Iraqi soldiers were seen by coalition
forces moving 55-gallon drums almost certainly containing
chemical agents.
April 7: Fox, echoing
NPR, reports that U.S. forces near Baghdad have discovered
a weapons cache of 20 medium-range missiles containing
sarin and mustard gas. Initial tests show that the deadly
chemicals are not "trace elements."
[In the coming weeks, this embarrassing non-discovery
is quickly stomped down the Memory Hole. The missiles
were never mentioned again.]
April 9: The crowd around
coalition troops toppling the Saddam statue in Baghdad
looks strangely sparse despite the network's assertions
to the contrary. The perspective is always in close
and even then there is no mob storming the statue to
hit it with their shoes. Just a handful of people. It's
constantly asserted that there's a huge crowd. [I'm
perplexed. Where's the huge crowd?!]
April 10: Fox "Breaking
News" report of weapons-grade plutonium found at
Al Tuwaitha. [In the coming weeks this "discovery"
was expeditiously shoved down the Memory Hole as well.]
April 10 (2:59 EDT):
A report noting with surprise "how little"
the Iraqis were celebrating the coalition invasion.
[An interesting contradiction of the allegations of
widespread celebration just the day before with the
toppling of the Saddam statue.]
April 10 (3 p.m. EDT:
Reporter Rick Leventhal) Fox "Breaking News"
report: A mobile bioweapons lab is found. Video of a
tiny tan truck—about the size of the smallest
truck that U-Haul rents – which had its cargo
bed and fuel tank shot up with bullets after a looter
tried to drive it away. Repeated assertions that this
is most definitely a "bioweapons" lab. A graphic
sequence is shown of a large Winnebago-type vehicle
that is massive compared to the tiny truck found. The
irony of this escapes the Fox newscasters and defense
"experts."
[This was the first "bioweapons lab" found,
not the larger one later found in Mosul. A week later
it is briefly conceded that the tiny truck was probably
never a bio weapons lab, but promises that real ones
will pour forth from the landscape continue. The second
phantom lab, a large tractor-trailer truck was discovered
around May 2 by Kurdish fighters.]
April 10: To show that
France is in bed with Saddam Hussein, Fox begins running
old footage of Saddam Hussein's September 1975 trip
to Paris to meet with Jacques Chirac and tour a nuclear
power plant. [Because Fox strives so hard to be "Fair
and Balanced," it's all the more curious how it
fails to inform its audience about another trip four
years later, this one to Baghdad on December 19, 1983
made by Reagan envoy and then former secretary of defense
Donald Rumsfeld (see pic below). The network again,
because it's so very "Fair and Balanced,"
also inexplicably forgot to tell its audience about
another trip by Rummy to Baghdad, this time on March
24, 1984, the very same day that a U.N. team found that
Iraqi forces had used mustard gas laced with a nerve
agent on Iranian soldiers. Rummy obviously wasn't too
concerned about the charges of gassing, as in 1986 when
he was considering a run for the Republican presidential
nomination of 1988, he listed his restoration of diplomatic
relations with WMD-using Iraq as one of his proudest
achievements.
But all that's an eternity ago for Imperial Conservatives
with a 20-second attention span. The Fox newscasters
rename Jacques Chirac "Jacques Iraq" (yuk,
yuk, yuk – what a side splitter!) and keep going.]
April 7: Repeated ominous
footage of barrels buried in a below-ground shed near
Karbala. The implication is that the Iraqi landscape
is replete with these types of shelters, all of them
brimming with evidence of chemical weapons. [These were
revealed to be agricultural chemicals as well.]
April 13: Fox Graphic:
"Bush: Syria Harboring Chemical Weapons."
[My favorite Fox war commentator is definitely Colonel
David Hunt. From my canvassing of all the cable network
war coverage, it's hard to find an analyst who is more
dogmatic. When coalition forces weren’t greeted
with hugs and kisses like he predicted and instead encountered
stiff resistance from Iraqi forces in Basra and other
places, Davey was all denial. Everything’s going
perfect. Rummy is God, hallelujah and praise Dubya!
There's not a problem in Iraq that can't be solved by
blowing some Iraqi's brains out.]
April 15: Fox analyst
Mansoor Ijaz claims that the top 55 Iraqi leaders (along
with the whole stash of chemical and biological WMDs
they have taken with them) are now living it up in Latakia,
Syria. [This is the same 55 that appeared on the deck
of cards and is still being captured – far from
all living it up in Syria.] On The Fox Report anchor
Shepard Smith completely breaks with any pretense of
objectivity and openly mocks actor Tim Robbins after
playing an excerpt of Robbins' speech to the National
Press Club. "Oh, that was so powerful!" Smith
mocked. [Impressive objectivity there, Mr. Smith.]
April 16: Fred Barnes
on Special Report with Brit Hume blames the looting
of the Iraqi National Museum on the museum staff. [Right
now there are so many claims and counterclaims about
the looting it's hard to tell what happened. In a Fox
segment on May 19 a coalition official asserted that
170,000 items were definitely not missing. Of course
he refused to give a ballpark estimate of what was missing,
which he'd surely have in order to plausibly deny that
the original estimate was wrong.]
April 18: Bill O'Reilly
opens his show calling Iraqis "ungrateful."
April 21: Bill O'Reilly
opens his show calling Iraqi Shiites "ungrateful
SOBs" and "fanatics." He concludes that
"[we] can't tolerate a fundamentalist state"
in Iraq.
[Whoa, O'Reilly. I thought we promised the Iraqis that
we were going to implement democracy, not democracy
that gives the U.S. the election results it wants. That's
not democracy, now, is it? By now it's quite clear that
despite the spinning on The No Spin Zone, Iraq is descending
into chaos.]
April 22: Lt. Colonel
Robert Maginnis states on The O'Reilly Factor that the
probability of finding WMDs is a 10 out of 10. [This
is the same Robert Maginnis who predicted a double-ring
defense of Baghdad in the Washington Times on January
7.] O'Reilly states that if no WMDs are found within
a month from today, then that spells big trouble. O'Reilly
promises to explore the issue a month later. [Cool,
let's hold his feet to the fire on that promise. On
an earlier show he said that U.S. credibility would
be "shot" if no WMDs were found. ]
May 8: Fox News Military
Analyst Major General Paul Vallely states on The O’Reilly
Factor that "Middle East agents" have told
him that Iraq’s WMDs along with 17 mobile weapons
labs (1 of which was captured around May 2) are now
buried in the Bakaa Valley in Syria 30 meters underground.
He also claims that France helped Iraqi leaders escape
to Europe by providing them with travel papers [a charge
that even the Pentagon later denies although it's apparent
that's where Vallely got his information].
May 11: On The Fox Report
with Rick Folbaum it is conceded that the nefarious
captured trailer contains not a shred of evidence of
WMDs, but Folbaum hints that what’s important
is that the trailer could have been used to make them.
[Hmmm. I thought we went to war for actual WMDs, not
for the ability to make WMDs.]
May 16: Special Report
with Brit Hume. Muslims, citing Islam's ban of alcohol,
are torching liquor stores and threatening their Christian
owners. Under Saddam's secular regime, Christian names
were banned and schools were nationalized, but guns
and alcohol were freely available; there was tolerance
for Iraq's 1 million Catholic and Protestant Christians.
In New and Improved Neocon Iraq, there's a letter circulating
in Baghdad threatening violence to even the families
of women who refuse to wear the traditional Muslim head
covering. [The report is yet another interesting and
reluctant concession of unintended consequences.]
May 19: O'Reilly discusses
a number of inflammatory and bogus charges that were
floated in the U.S. media about France (e.g., France
supplied Iraq with precision switches used in nuclear
weapons, French companies sold spare parts to Iraq for
military planes and helicopters, France possessed illegal
strains of smallpox, France helped Iraqi leaders escape
to Europe by providing them with travel papers). Recall
this last charge was made by Major General Paul Vallely
on May 8 on The O'Reilly Factor. Again, the Pentagon
denies all such charges although much of the Beltway
thinks it's obvious that the Pentagon is the source
of them. O'Reilly claims that Vallely is only irresponsible
if the charges don't turn out to be true. O'Reilly refers
to documents that prove that the French government was
briefing Saddam right until the war started. [Briefed
on what?]
May 20: O'Reilly concedes
that the Private Jessica Lynch rescue story could be
a fraud, as asserted by the BBC and Los Angeles Times
columnist Robert Scheer. "Somebody is lying,"
he states. He says that if the U.S. military has concocted
a fraud, then it will be a terrible scandal but if the
BBC and Scheer are wrong, nothing will happen to them.
He says he is skeptical of the BBC and Scheer.
To prove his point he brings on no other than Colonel
David Hunt. Over and over, Hunt calls the allegations
of staged rescue an "assail on the finest soldiers
in the world." He claims that the ambulance with
Lynch in it that drove up to a Marine checkpoint was
never shot at, its drivers demanded $10,000 for information
on Jessica, Saddam Hospital was guarded by uniformed
Iraqi soldiers and Fedayeen, Jessica's life was saved,
and coalition forces didn't trash the hospital. What
were his sources for this information? The special ops
members on the raid, some of whom are his friends and
former colleagues. Over and over Hunt kept saying, "They're
the best soldiers in the world, they're the best in
the world. Why would they make this up?"
[What followed next was an exchange that's priceless
and one of many that goes by far too un-analyzed on
Fox every day:]
Hunt: In my opinion it's an assault, an effrontery
to the finest men and women in our service, it's an
assault on Jessica, it's an assault on these great guys,
these great special operations guys ... at a minimum
we should no longer buy the L.A. Times, no longer buy
the Toronto Free Press, and shut the BBC off. It's a
government to government issue...this is calling into
question the veracity of the finest soldiers in the
world and it's uncalled for, it's absolutely unbelievable."
O'Reilly: If you [Hunt] turn out to be right, nothing
will happen to Scheer...he'll just go along blithely
printing his lies and living his life and getting paid
for it.
[To the Colonel: U.S. special ops soldiers may be the
best in the world at what they do, but how does it logically
follow from that assessment that particular actions
taken during the raid were not excessive and unjustified?
How is the BBC's story an assault on Jessica?! What
do you mean when you mention a "government to government
issue" given that the U.S. government now controls
Iraq?! Is the Pentagon the most effective check on its
own possible misdeeds? How convenient if you're suggesting
that it is. Who is your source that Iraqi doctors were
trying to ransom Jessica? Why hasn't this allegation
made its way into any other news reports?]
[To O'Reilly: If the raid does turn out to be mostly
staged, there'll be no terrible scandal precisely because
you, Fox News, and the Pentagon will assert just the
opposite and allow yet another embarrassment to slide
into the Memory Hole. This is exactly why your demand
for accountability from the BBC and L.A. Times is so
hollow and hypocritical. Instead of plumbing the U.S.
military to investigate itself, why don't you interview
Iraqi doctor Harith al-Houssona as the London Times
did on April 16 (where the story was first broken, not
by the BBC or Robert Scheer) who actually saved Lynch's
life instead of the U.S. special ops who could have
jeopardized it? The doctor testifies that all Iraqi
forces left the day before the raid and that Jessica
was delivered by an ambulance that had to return to
the hospital because it was shot at by Marines. Why
would he lie? You say you automatically
trust the Pentagon. Why, when tales of Lynch's heroics
in fighting off 500 Iraqi soldiers with one hand while
severely wounded and tales that she had amnesia have
already been proven bogus?]
May 22 (5:54 a.m. CDT):
Richard King, a military doctor, appears on Fox and
Friends with promises by the show's hosts that he will
verify that the Jessica Lynch rescue wasn't staged.
King doesn't prove anything. He states that he arrived
at Saddam Hospital the day after the rescue, concedes
damage and mal-treatment of doctors at the hospital,
and that he "was told " that the hospital
was guarded by hostile forces but doesn't specify who
told him. [The testimony of the hospital staff contradicts
this last hearsay.]
May 22: O'Reilly fails
to live up to his promise to make a big stink if no
WMDs are found by today. In his Talking Points Memo
he wonders why the U.S. has caught such informed Iraqis
as Dr. Germ and Ms. Anthrax and has gotten no leads.
He states that more time is needed [contradicting what
he said more than a month ago, when he said that if
no WMDs were found after 2 months U.S. credibility would
be "shot" and there would be big trouble].
He ends his Memo saying Bush must candidly address the
situation soon.
June 2: [Unfortunately
for O'Reilly, Bush isn't candidly explaining anything.]
A video clip on Fox and Friends is shown with Bush in
Poland claiming that "[w]e found" weapons
of mass destruction. His evidence? Two trailers found
near Mosul that were supposedly used as mobile bioweapons
labs. [A June 7 article by the Times' Judith Miller
reports serious doubts by some analysts that the two
trailers were used as mobile bioweapons labs. Said one
senior analyst about the initial CIA report, it "was
a rushed job and looks political." Yes, they violated
U.N. resolutions but this is another red herring to
suggest WMDs.]
June 4: O'Reilly's Talking
Points Memo: [Surreal.] O'Reilly
says that the WMD issue has now been politicized
[!!]. The war was a just war because
there's now great progress between Palestinians and
Israelis and that alone made the war worthwhile
[?!!]. Also the mass graves and other horrors discovered
add to the case for war. The intelligence was either
wrong or more time is needed to find the WMDs. [Again
contradicting what he said on and before April 22.]
June 11: Fox reports
a bus blast in Jerusalem caused by Hamas, killing 15
and wounding at least 100. [Looks like the real reason
for war according to O'Reilly (Israeli-Palestinian peace)
has also disintegrated, but don't expect O'Reilly to
admit it.] |
The Hearst-owned Popular Mechanics
magazine takes aim at the 9/11 Truth Movement (without
ever acknowledging it by that name) with a cover story
in its March 2005 edition. Sandwiched between ads and
features for monster trucks, NASCAR paraphernalia, and
off-road racing are twelve dense and brilliantly designed
pages purporting to debunk the myths of 9/11.
The article's approach is to identify and attack a
series of claims which it asserts represent the whole
of 9/11 skepticism. It gives
the false impression that these claims, several of which
are clearly absurd, represent the breadth of challenges
to the official account of the flights, the World Trade
Center attack, and the Pentagon attack. Meanwhile
it entirely ignores vast bodies of evidence showing
that only insiders had the means, motive, and opportunity
to carry out the attack.
The article gives no hint of the put options on the
targeted airlines, warnings received by government and
corporate officials, complicit behavior by top officials,
obstruction of justice by a much larger group, or obvious
frauds in the official story. Instead it attacks a mere
16 claims of its choosing, which it asserts are the
"most prevalent" among "conspiracy theorists."
The claims are grouped into topics which cover some
of the subjects central to the analysis of 9-11 Research.
However, for each topic, the
article presents specious claims to divert the reader
from understanding the issue. For example, the
three pages devoted to attacking the Twin Towers' demolition
present three red-herring claims and avoid the dozens
of points I feature in my presentations, such as the
Twin Towers' Demolition.
The article brackets its distortion of the issues highlighted
by 9/11 skeptics with smears against the skeptics
themselves, whom it dehumanizes and accuses of "disgracing
the memories" of the victims.
More important, it misrepresents skeptics' views by
implying that the skeptics' community is an undifferentiated
"army" that wholly embraces the article's
sixteen "poisonous claims," which it asserts
are "at the root of virtually every 9/11 alternative
scenario." In fact much of the 9/11 truth community
has been working to expose many of these claims as disinformation.
"The Lies Are Out There"
James Meigs, appointed editor of Popular Mechanics
in May 2004, trashes skeptics of the official story
of 9/11/01 as irresponsible disgracers of the memories
of victims, apart from "we as a society."
This article has a page of Editor's Notes, "The
Lies Are Out There," written by James Meigs, whose
previous columns have praised military technology (such
as the UAVs used in Fallujah). Meigs places outside
of society anyone who questions the official version
of events of 9/11/01:
We as a society accept the basic premise that a
group of Islamist terrorists hijacked four airplanes
and turned them into weapons against us. ... Sadly,
the noble search for truth is now being hijacked by
a growing army of conspiracy theorists.
Meigs throws a series of insults at the "conspiracy
theorists," saying they ignore the facts and engage
in "elaborate, shadowy theorizing," and concludes
his diatribe by saying:
[T]hose who peddle fantasies that this country encouraged,
permitted or actually carried out the attacks are
libeling the truth -- and disgracing the memories
of the thousands who died that day.
Besides trashing the skeptics, and conflating "this
country" with its corrupt leaders, Meig's piece
attempts to legitimate PM's "investigation."
It reads:
We assembled a team of reporters and researchers,
including professional fact checkers and the editors
of PM, and methodically analyzed all 16 conspiracy
claims. We interviewed scores of engineers, aviation
experts, military officials, eyewitnesses and members
of the investigative teams who have held the wreckage
of the attacks in their own hands. We pored over photography,
maps, blueprints, aviation logs and transcripts. In
every single instance, we found that the facts used
by the conspiracy theorists to support their fantasies
were mistaken, misunderstood, or deliberately falsified.
This sounds impressive, but the article provides no
evidence to back up these claims. It provides no footnotes
to source its many assertions, and despite the scores
of experts listed in its final section, the article
cites only a few "experts," who would themselves
likely be suspects if normal criminal justice procedures
were used to investigate the crime.
Moreover, glaring errors in the
article -- such as the assertion that there was only
a single interception in the decade before 9/11/01 --
don't inspire confidence in PM's "professional
fact checkers." It echoes the discredited
assertions of official reports such as the FEMA WTC
Building Performance Study and the 9/11 Commission Report,
and provides no evidence that it is anything but a well-orchestrated
hit piece to perpetuate the 9/11 cover-up.
"9/11: DEBUNKING the MYTHS"
The main article consists of six two-page spreads,
each devoted to a topic. Spanning these spreads are
a series of sixteen "poisonous claims," which
the article purports to refute, while it implicitly
identifies them as the beliefs of all in the "growing
army" of "conspiracy theorists." The
two-page spreads, beginning on page 70, are as follows:
* Introduction
* THE PLANES
* THE WORLD TRADE CENTER
* THE WORLD TRADE CENTER (continued)
* THE PENTAGON
* FLIGHT 93
Superficially, the topics appear to address the major
physical evidence issues brought up by the skeptics
(while ignoring the mountains of evidence of foreknowledge,
motive, and unique means possessed by insiders). However,
the sixteen "most prevalent claims made by conspiracy
theorists" which it attacks are mostly specious
claims, many of which were probably invented to discredit
skepticism of the official story in the first place.
The article debunks the more specious claims, and uses
distortion and falsehoods to counter serious claims.
Thus the main approach of the article is to set up
and attack a straw man of claims that it pretends represent
the entirety of the skeptics' movement. The list includes
many of the same claims that are debunked on the companion
to this site, 911review.com. The article gives no hint
of the questions raised by the evidence in this site,
nor any sense of the issues raised by the broader 9/11
truth movement.
Before proceeding to its 16 points, the article's introduction
levels more insults at the skeptics -- "extremists",
some of whose theories are "byproducts of cynical
imaginations that aim to inject suspicion and animosity
into public debate." It begins by asking you to
type "World Trade Center conspiracy" into
Google.com, and claims that "More than 3000 books
on 9/11 have been published" -- an incredible claim.
(Of these supposed 3000 titles, we recommend only a
few, listed here.)
The sixteen "claims" attacked by the article
are described here under the headings taken from the
article, which indicate either the claim, the counter-claim,
or a broader issue. [...] |
NEW YORK - An incisive new documentary
is taking aim at the U.S. media's one-sided coverage
of the war in Iraq, arguing that its collective complicity
deceived the populace and made the war possible.
"WMD: Weapons of Mass Deception", which cost
just 200,000 dollars to produce, points to a wide array
of failures in the accuracy of the reporting, as well
as an unwillingness to question the George W. Bush administration's
claims and actions.
It was produced by Danny Schechter, a self-proclaimed
"network refugee" who worked for CNN and as
a producer for a prominent television news show.
"This is the central problem
of our democracy," he told IPS in an interview.
"This isn't a sidebar issue. You can't have a democracy
when people aren't being informed."
The film documents the U.S. media's near-unanimous
acceptance of the George W. Bush administration's claim
that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein possessed nefarious
weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and therefore must
be removed from power by unilateral U.S. military action.
The film also attacks the media's credulity
of alleged links between Hussein and the al-Qaeda terrorist
network -- claims that were unsupported by any actual
evidence.
"The fact that they [the media] allowed the Bush
administration to manipulate the truth so grossly and
so nakedly in the run-up to the war made the war possible,"
Eric Alterman, media critic and writer for the Nation
magazine, says in the film.
Schechter told IPS he was disturbed at the adherence
to the government's line and lack of journalistic questioning
among U.S. news outlets before and during the Iraq war,
a time he calls "a really shameful period for journalism."
"It hints at the emergence of
a state media system in our country," he said.
The film references a study by the media watchdog Fairness
and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) of on-camera sources
used in television news in the run-up to the war. Out
of 1,167 experts brought on camera during news broadcasts,
the study shows, only three percent opposed the U.S.-led
invasion.
"You had this incredible imbalance where people
who were critical couldn't be heard," he said.
The film argues that this marginalisation
of dissent and the media's refusal to question the war
in Iraq was in part due to journalists and networks
fear of being seen as "unpatriotic."
"In the post 9/11 media there was a lot of patriotic
political correctness," Schechter said. "You
have a president who says, 'You're either with us or
with the terrorists,' so if you criticise him you're
with the terrorists. This created an intimidating environment."
One aspect of the "media war" the film deals
with in detail is the vast number of "embedded"
reporters in Iraq, a policy that Schechter says led
to jingoistic coverage. [...]
The film argues that since an embedded reporter's life
is essentially in the hands of the soldiers, and they
spend so much time together under extreme circumstances,
the reporter grows attached to the troops. The
bond that is formed jeopardises the reporter's ability
to be accurate and objective and leads to cheerleading
instead of critical journalism, Schechter says. [...]
"WMD" has already received international
acclaim and is being screened at theatres from Scotland
to Australia. It won the Austin Film Festival and Denver
Film Festival Awards for best documentary. [...]
The film is scheduled to come out on DVD in March to
coincide with the second anniversary of the invasion
of Iraq. |
WASHINGTON - Former Homeland Security
Secretary Tom Ridge met privately with Republican pollsters
twice in a 10-day span last spring as he embarked on
more than a dozen trips to presidential battleground
states.
Ridge's get-togethers with Republican strategists Frank
Luntz and Bill McInturff during
a period the secretary was saying his agency was playing
no role in Bush's re-election campaign were revealed
in daily appointment calendars obtained by The Associated
Press under the Freedom of Information Act.
"We don't do politics in the Department of Homeland
Security," Ridge told reporters during the election
season.
His aides resisted releasing the calendars
for over a year, finally providing them to the AP three
days after Ridge left office this month.
Homeland Security officials said the meeting with Luntz
at department headquarters was aimed at improving public
communication of the department's message, particularly
on TV. Ridge declined an interview with the AP about
the calendars, referring questions to former aides.
"We did not discuss homeland security in a presidential
campaign context," said Susan Neely, a former assistant
homeland security secretary who attended the May 17
session with Luntz and Ridge. "We asked him his
impression of how well we were explaining whatever the
issues were of the day. There was no follow-up meeting."
Neely said the discussion took place after Ridge and
Luntz ran into each other and the homeland security
secretary expressed an interest in hearing Luntz's assessment.
McInturff, who has done the polling for all of Ridge's
campaigns for Congress and Pennsylvania governor, said
the two meet every few months to "shoot the breeze."
Homeland security officials said the May 26 conversation
between Ridge and McInturff was personal and the secretary
did not discuss any homeland security-related issues.
"When you've got Secret Service protection it's
a heck of a lot easier for me to meet the secretary
of a major agency at the agency than it is for him to
come to Old Town and have lunch," McInturff said.
Old Town is a neighborhood in Alexandria, Va., home
of McInturff's company, Public Opinion Strategies.
"I have zero connection with anyone doing business
with homeland security, zero connection with the Bush
campaign," McInturff said.
Ridge's meetings with the pollsters
occurred just before the first of 16 trips, from late
May to late October, to 10 states important to the president's
re-election campaign. During the same period, Ridge
made 20 appearances in nine uncontested states.
[...]
At the time of Ridge's meetings with
the pollsters, President Bush's re-election campaign
was reeling from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal and the
news media was speculating that Ridge might replace
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, or even Vice President
Dick Cheney.
Neely said Ridge's future in government did not come
up in the meeting with Luntz. |
A 32-story building burns for more
than 24 hours and does not collapse. It does not collapse
because buildings made of steel and concrete, despite
what we are led to believe, do not typically fall to
the ground because of fire, even a protracted fire as
witnessed in Madrid. In fact before September 11th,
2001, no building had ever collapsed as a result of
fire alone. In past events, high-rise buildings burned
for as long as six days before the fires were extinguished
and yet remained standing.
The media covering this event has been hovering on
the edge of its seat, waiting for the building to fall,
frequently commenting on the debris falling from the
inferno implying that some tumbling sheet rock are an
indication of the building's seemingly inevitable downfall.
Their headlines reiterate this conclusion: Spanish
Skyscraper Fire Subsiding, But Collapse Possible,
Fears
of collapse as fire ravages huge Madrid office block,
Madrid
skyscraper collapse feared as inferno rages. Ignoring
objectivism, the reports have been clearly skewed to
direct the public to belive in the new post-9/11 laws
of physics:
"It is clear the structure has been damaged
and has suffered high temperatures, and we cannot
be certain that a pillar, girder or some other structural
element will not collapse," Javier Sanz, fire
chief for the Madrid region, told state radio. [read
article]
The connection between this event and the collapse
of WTC building 7 is impossible to ignore and the media
are doing everything in their power to subvert reality
and spin this event: All they have to do is remind us
its going to collapse over and over again until the
next news cycle and the event is forgotten in the back
pages of the newspaper. At that point it won't matter
if the building actually collapsed or not and the world
will keep spinning according to the new post-9/11 laws
of physics. |
In the wake of controversy over
a Colorado professor's views of 9-11, a teacher at the
University of Pennsylvania who says the attacks were
an "inside job" believes he's on the verge
of losing his job.
Francisco Gil-White, an assistant
professor of psychology, also has written articles alleging
NATO framed Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic and says
the U.S. is a secret enemy of Israel, the Philadelphia
Inquirer reported.
"The academic establishment is there to protect
freedom of thought," Gil-White told the paper.
"That is violated when the mere fact that I question
the U.S. government becomes a reason to threaten me
with the loss of my job."
The Colorado professor, Ward Churchill, sparked controversy
with an essay that describes the thousands of American
victims who died in the World Trade Center inferno as
"little Eichmanns" who were perpetuating America's
"mighty engine of profit."
Gil-White objects to being compared to Churchill, and
Penn officials insist academic freedom is not an issue
in their review of his performance, the Inquirer reported.
"We are baffled by Professor Gil-White's assertions
about the role of his politics in our review,"
Penn psychology chair Robert DeRubeis said in a written
response.
Last year, the university gave Gil-White a one-year
extension on his contract instead of the standard three
years because "questions emerged" about the
quality of his research and teaching, DeRubeis said.
Officials now are conducting a second review to determine
whether to extend his contract again.
Students have signed a petition of support, calling
him a "wonderful teacher" with good rapport.
"A lot of people who take his
course say it's the best course of their lives,"
said freshman psychology major Michelle Rajunov.
But the Philadelphia paper said Gil-White refused to
address the department curriculum committee's written
concerns about his Psychology of Ethnicity course.
Gil-White said the committee had asked
him to "radically gut" the class, and he decided
instead to teach it his way on a not-for-credit basis.
The Inquirer said Gil-White first began to stake out
his controversial positions when, shortly after the
9-11 attacks, he came across a website run by former
1960s activist, Jared Israel, who claims to have "evidence
of high-level government complicity on 9-11."
Gil-White now is deputy editor of the site, "The
Emperor's New Clothes," and has written for it
about the war in Yugoslavia, the Palestinian-Israeli
conflict and ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka.
Along with his controversial writing,
Gil-White has alleged that Penn political science professor
Ian Lustick, who worked in the State Department 25 years
ago, is an agent of U.S. intelligence working to undermine
Israel.
But he insists his relationship with colleagues is
not an issue.
"My perception is that I was getting along fine
with people," he said. |
ROME - Up to half a million peace
demonstrators marched through the centre of Rome to
demand the release of Italian journalist Giulian Sgrena,
held hostage in Iraqsince February 4, city authorities
said.
"My offices have told me that up to 500,000 people
are participating in the march," Rome's left-wing
mayor Walter Veltroni told AFP as the colourful throng
snaked through the Italian capital.
"The population has come out to demand Giuliana's
release. And we are going to go on demanding it,"
Veltroni said.
Italian media said earlier some 200,000 people were
expected to join the march, which got under way at Rome's
Piazza della Repubblica shortly after 2:00 pm (1300
GMT) and took three hours to wind its way the six kilometres
(four miles) across the city to a rally at the ancient
Circus Maximus.
Another famous landmark, the Colosseum, was to be lit
up at dusk in symbolic backing for the city's demand
for Sgrena's release.
The journalist's elderly parents, her companion Pier
Scolari and staff from her newspaper, the communist
daily Il Manifesto, led the march, which came a few
days after a tearful Sgrena pleaded with Italy's government
to save her life by withdrawing its troops from Iraq
in a video-tape released by her kidnappers.
"There are more than we
had hoped," said 74-year-old Valentino Parlato,
a founder member of the newspaper. [...] |
CHICAGO - An off-duty correctional
officer shot and killed a friend and co-worker Saturday
whom he mistakenly believed was trying to carjack a
vehicle being driven by his wife, police said.
Arlin McClendon, 36, was killed while trying to pull
a joke on a longtime friend in an area where two dozen
carjackings have occurred in less than a year, authorities
said.
"It is a tragic accident, a case of mistaken identity,"
said Calumet City police Sgt. Larry Smith. "The
victim and the shooter were lifelong friends. They worked
together."
McClendon was driving in the suburb just south of Chicago
at about 1 a.m. with a colleague when he spotted a sport
utility vehicle that belonged to his friend.
"McClendon began honking and flashing his lights
in an attempt to get the vehicle to pull over,"
Smith said.
What McClendon did not know was that his friend's wife
was driving the SUV with the couple's 4-year-old child.
His friend, who authorities did not identify Saturday,
was in a third vehicle, Smith said.
Once the vehicle stopped, as a joke, McClendon ran
up to it and started pounding on one of the windows,
said Bill Cunningham, a spokesman for the Cook County
Sheriff's Department, which runs the jail where the
two men worked.
He also began pulling on a door handle.
The woman's husband did not recognize McClendon, whom
he had worked with for years at the Cook County Jail,
and mistakenly believed his wife was being carjacked,
Smith said.
"He got out of his car and identified
himself as a police officer and shot his friend,"
he said.
McClendon, who was shot multiple times,
was pronounced dead at the scene, authorities said.
Over the last six months, 24 carjackings have occurred
in Calumet City and "that may have played into"
the off-duty officer's belief that his wife was being
carjacked, Cunningham said.
The two men both started working at the jail in 1992.
Correctional officers are not issued firearms, but
are allowed to carry weapons while off-duty, he said.
No charges had been filed. |
WASHINGTON - Inflation moved to
the front burner after a report showing a surprisingly
sharp increase in wholesale prices prompted a reassessment
of the US economic outlook.
The Labor Department said its producer price index
(PPI) jumped 0.3 percent in January, while the core
rate, which excludes volatile food and energy costs,
soared 0.8 percent.
The headline PPI figure was in line with forecasts,
but the core rate was sharply
higher than the 0.2 percent expected by private forecasters
and was the fastest pace since late 1998.
In the past 12 months, the overall PPI was up 4.2 percent
and the core PPI was up 2.7 percent, the biggest year-over-year
gain in nine years.
The latest figures sparked fresh concern about inflation,
which has been largely in check in recent years. Some
experts said the trend, if it continues, may force the
Federal Reserve to push up interest rates at a more
aggressive pace. [...]
Marie-Pierre Ripert at Ixis Corporate and Investment
Bank said some of price increases may be a result of
the weaker US dollar, which raises the cost of imports.
She noted that the rise was led by a significant increase
in capital equipment prices and some consumer goods
prices -- in particular cars and tobacco.
"Even if a part of the rise is linked to special
factors (such as tobacco), the significant rise in core
producer prices reflects a rising 'pass through,' which
could become a cause for concern for the Fed,"
she said.
"Indeed, (Fed chairman
Alan) Greenspan put forward the fact that foreign exporters
could begin to raise their prices in dollars in the
future if the dollar declines further." [...] |
It appeared to be one of archaeology's
most sensational finds. The skull fragment discovered
in a peat bog near Hamburg was more than 36,000 years
old - and was the vital missing link between modern
humans and Neanderthals.
This, at least, is what Professor Reiner Protsch von
Zieten - a distinguished, cigar-smoking German anthropologist
- told his scientific colleagues, to global acclaim,
after being invited to date the extremely rare skull.
However, the professor's 30-year-old
academic career has now ended in disgrace after the
revelation that he systematically falsified the dates
on this and numerous other "stone age" relics.
Yesterday his university in
Frankfurt announced the professor had been forced to
retire because of numerous "falsehoods and manipulations".
According to experts, his deceptions
may mean an entire tranche of the history of man's development
will have to be rewritten.
"Anthropology is going to have to completely revise
its picture of modern man between 40,000 and 10,000
years ago," said Thomas Terberger, the archaeologist
who discovered the hoax. "Prof Protsch's work appeared
to prove that anatomically modern humans and Neanderthals
had co-existed, and perhaps even had children together.
This now appears to be rubbish."
The scandal only came to light when Prof Protsch was
caught trying to sell his department's entire chimpanzee
skull collection to the United States.
An inquiry later established that he
had also passed off fake fossils as real ones and had
plagiarised other scientists' work.
His discovery appeared to show that Neanderthals had
spread much further north than was previously known.
But his university inquiry was told that a crucial
Hamburg skull fragment, which was believed to have come
from the world's oldest German, a Neanderthal known
as Hahnhöfersand Man, was actually a mere 7,500
years old, according to Oxford University's radiocarbon
dating unit. The unit established
that other skulls had been wrongly dated too.
Another of the professor's sensational finds, "Binshof-Speyer"
woman, lived in 1,300 BC and not 21,300 years ago, as
he had claimed, while "Paderborn-Sande man"
(dated at 27,400 BC) only died a couple of hundred years
ago, in 1750.
"It's deeply embarrassing. Of course the university
feels very bad about this," Professor Ulrich Brandt,
who led the investigation into Prof Protsch's activities,
said yesterday. "Prof Protsch refused to meet us.
But we had 10 sittings with 12 witnesses.
"Their stories about him were increasingly bizarre.
After a while it was hard to take it seriously. You
had to laugh. It was just unbelievable. At the end of
the day what he did was incredible."
During their investigation, the university
discovered that Prof Protsch, 65, a flamboyant figure
with a fondness for gold watches, Porsches and Cuban
cigars, was unable to work his own carbon-dating machine.
Instead, after returning from Germany
to America, where he did his doctorate, and taking up
a professorship, he had simply made things up.
In one case he had claimed that a 50 million-year-old
"half-ape" called Adapis had been found in
Switzerland, an archaeological sensation. In reality,
the ape had been dug up in France, where several other
examples had already been found. [...]
Why, though, had he done it?
"If you find a skull that's more
than 30,000 years old it's a sensation. If you find
three of them people notice you. It's good for your
career," Prof Terberger said. "At the end
of the day it was about ambition."
Other details of the professor's life also appeared
to crumble under scrutiny. Before he disappeared from
the university's campus last year, Prof Protsch told
his students he had examined Hitler's and Eva Braun's
bones.
He also boasted of having flats in
New York, Florida and California, where, he claimed,
he hung out with Arnold Schwarzenegger and Steffi Graf.
Even the professor's aristocratic title, "von Zieten",
appears to be bogus.
Far from being the descendant of a dashing general
in the hussars, the professor was the son of a Nazi
MP, Wilhelm Protsch, Der Spiegel magazine revealed last
October.
The university is investigating how
thousands of documents lodged in the anthropology department
relating to the Nazis' gruesome scientific experiments
in the 1930s were mysteriously shredded, allegedly under
the professor's instructions.
They also discovered that some of the 12,000 skeletons
stored in the department's "bone cellar" were
missing their heads, apparently sold to friends of the
professor in the US and sympathetic dentists.
Yesterday the university admitted that it should have
discovered the professor's fabrications far earlier.
But it pointed out that, like all public servants in
Germany, the high-profile anthropologist was virtually
impossible to sack, and had also proved difficult to
pin down.
"He was perfect at being evasive,"
Prof Brandt said yesterday. "He would switch from
saying 'it isn't really clear' to giving diffuse statements.
"I'm not a psychologist so I can't say why he
did it. But my guess is that when he came back from
the States 30 years ago he realised he wasn't up to
the job of being a professor. So he started inventing
things. It rapidly became a habit.'
Yesterday the professor, who lives in Mainz with his
wife Angelina, didn't respond to emails from the Guardian
asking him to comment on the affair. But in earlier
remarks to Der Spiegel he insisted that he was the victim
of an "intrigue".
"All the disputed fossils are my personal property,"
he told the magazine.
Missing links and planted stone age
finds
Piltdown Man
The most infamous of all scientific frauds was unearthed
in 1912 in a Sussex gravel pit. With its huge human-like
braincase and ape-like jaw, the Piltdown Man "fossil"
was named Eoanthropus dawsoni after Charles Dawson,
the solicitor and amateur archaeologist who discovered
it. For 40 years Piltdown Man was heralded as the missing
link between humans and their primate ancestors. But
in 1953 scientists concluded it was a forgery. Radiocarbon
dating showed the human skull was just 600 years old,
while the jawbone was that of an orang-utan. The entire
package of fossil fragments found at Piltdown - which
included a prehistoric cricket bat - had been planted.
The devil's archaeologist
Japanese archaeologist Shinichi Fujimura was so prolific
at uncovering prehistoric artefacts he earned the nickname
"God's hands". At site after site, Fujimura
discovered stoneware and relics that pushed back the
limits of Japan's known history. The researcher and
his stone age finds drew international attention and
rewrote text books. In November 2000 the spell was broken
when a newspaper printed pictures of Fujimura digging
holes and burying objects that he later dug up and announced
as major finds. "I was tempted by the devil. I
don't know how I can apologise for what I did,"
he said.
Piltdown Turkey
The supposed fossil of Archaeoraptor, which was to become
known as the "Piltdown turkey", came to light
in 1999 when National Geographic magazine published
an account of its discovery. It seemed to show another
missing link - this time between birds and dinosaurs.
Archaeoraptor appeared to be the remains of a large
feathered bird with the tail of a dinosaur. The fossil
was smuggled out of China and sold to a private collector
in the US for £51,000. Experts were suspicious
and closer examination showed the specimen to be a "composite"
- two fossils stuck together with strong glue. |
And Finally...
Stewart on Guckert |
February 16, 2005 |
Click
here to watch the Jon Stewart Daily Show clip on
Guckert and Bloggers. (QuickTime required) |
Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|