|
In our schools, children learn
that the US fought the Vietnam war against a "communist
threat" to "us". Is it any wonder that
so many don't understand the truth about Iraq?
How does thought control work in societies that call
themselves free? Why are famous journalists so eager,
almost as a reflex, to minimise the culpability of a
prime minister who shares responsibility for the unprovoked
attack on a defenceless people, for laying waste to
their land and for killing at least 100,000 people,
most of them civilians, having sought to justify this
epic crime with demonstrable lies? What made the BBC's
Mark Mardell describe the invasion of Iraq as "a
vindication for him"? Why have broadcasters never
associated the British or American state with terrorism?
Why have such privileged communicators, with unlimited
access to the facts, lined up to describe an unobserved,
unverified, illegitimate, cynically manipulated election,
held under a brutal occupation, as "democratic",
with the pristine aim of being "free and fair"?
That quotation belongs to Helen Boaden, the director
of BBC News.
Have she and the others read
no history? Or is the history they know, or choose to
know, subject to such amnesia and omission that it produces
a world-view as seen only through a one-way moral mirror?
There is no suggestion of conspiracy. This one-way mirror
ensures that most of humanity is regarded in terms of
its usefulness to "us", its desirability or
expendability, its worthiness or unworthiness: for example,
the notion of "good" Kurds in Iraq and "bad"
Kurds in Turkey. The unerring
assumption is that "we" in the dominant west
have moral standards superior to "theirs".
One of "their" dictators (often a former client
of ours, such as Saddam Hussein) kills thousands of
people and he is declared a monster, a second Hitler.
When one of our leaders does the same he is viewed,
at worst, like Blair, in Shakespearean terms. Those
who kill people with car bombs are "terrorists";
those who kill far more people with cluster bombs are
the noble occupants of a "quagmire".
Historical amnesia can spread quickly. Only ten years
after the Vietnam war, which I reported, an opinion
poll in the United States found that a third of Americans
could not remember which side their government had supported.
This demonstrated the insidious power of the dominant
propaganda, that the war was essentially a conflict
of "good" Vietnamese against "bad"
Vietnamese, in which the Americans became "involved",
bringing democracy to the people of southern Vietnam
faced with a "communist threat". Such a false
and dishonest assumption permeated the media coverage,
with honourable exceptions. The truth is that the longest
war of the 20th century was a war waged against Vietnam,
north and south, communist and non-communist, by America.
It was an unprovoked invasion of the people's homeland
and their lives, just like the invasion of Iraq. Amnesia
ensures that, while the relatively few deaths of the
invaders are constantly acknowledged, the deaths of
up to five million Vietnamese are consigned to oblivion.
What are the roots of this? Certainly, "popular
culture", especially Hollywood movies, can decide
what and how little we remember. Selective education
at a tender age performs the same task. I have been
sent a widely used revision guide for GCSE modern world
history, on Vietnam and the cold war. This is learned
by 14- to-16-year-olds in our schools. It informs their
understanding of a pivotal period in history, which
must influence how they make sense of today's news from
Iraq and elsewhere.
It is shocking. It says that under the 1954 Geneva
Accord: "Vietnam was partitioned into communist
north and democratic south." In
one sentence, truth is despatched. The final
declaration of the Geneva conference divided Vietnam
"temporarily" until free national elections
were held on 26 July 1956. There was little doubt that
Ho Chi Minh would win and form Vietnam's first democratically
elected government. Certainly, President Eisenhower
was in no doubt of this. "I
have never talked with a person knowledgeable in Indo-Chinese
affairs," he wrote, "who did not agree that
. . . 80 per cent of the population would have voted
for the communist Ho Chi Minh as their leader."
Not only did the United States refuse
to allow the UN to administer the agreed elections two
years later, but the "democratic" regime in
the south was an invention. One of the inventors, the
CIA official Ralph McGehee, describes in his masterly
book Deadly Deceits how a brutal expatriate mandarin,
Ngo Dinh Diem, was imported from New Jersey to be "president"
and a fake government was put in place. "The CIA,"
he wrote, "was ordered to sustain that illusion
through propaganda [placed in the media]."
Phoney elections were arranged,
hailed in the west as "free and fair", with
American officials fabricating "an 83 per cent
turnout despite Vietcong terror". The GCSE
guide alludes to none of this, nor that "the terrorists",
whom the Americans called the Vietcong, were also southern
Vietnamese defending their homeland against the American
invasion and whose resistance was popular.
For Vietnam, read Iraq.
The tone of this tract is from the point of view of
"us". There is no sense that a national liberation
movement existed in Vietnam, merely "a communist
threat", merely the propaganda that "the USA
was terrified that many other countries might become
communist and help the USSR - they didn't want to be
outnumbered", merely that President Lyndon B Johnson
"was determined to keep South Vietnam communist-free"
(emphasis as in the original). This proceeds quickly
to the Tet Offensive of 1968, which "ended in the
loss of thousands of American lives - 14,000 in 1969
- most were young men". There
is no mention of the millions of Vietnamese lives also
lost in the offensive. And America merely began "a
bombing campaign": there is no mention of the greatest
tonnage of bombs dropped in the history of warfare,
of a military strategy that was deliberately designed
to force millions of people to abandon their homes,
and of chemicals used in a manner that profoundly changed
the environment and the genetic order, leaving a once-bountiful
land all but ruined.
This guide is from a private publisher, but its bias
and omissions reflect that of the official syllabuses,
such as the syllabus from Oxford and Cambridge, whose
cold war section refers to Soviet "expansionism"
and the "spread" of communism; there is not
a word about the "spread" of rapacious America.
One of its "key questions"
is: "How effectively did the USA contain the spread
of communism?" Good versus evil for untutored minds.
"Phew, loads for you to learn here . . ."
say the authors of the revision guide, "so get
it learned right now." Phew, the British empire
did not happen; there is nothing about the atrocious
colonial wars that were models for the successor power,
America, in Indonesia, Vietnam, Chile, El Salvador,
Nicaragua, to name but a few along modern history's
imperial trail of blood of which Iraq is the latest.
And now Iran? The drumbeat has already
begun. How many more innocent people have to die before
those who filter the past and the present wake up to
their moral responsibility to protect our memory and
the lives of human beings? |
SUTTER, California -- A grade school
that required students to wear radio frequency identification
badges that can track their every move has ended the
program because the company that developed the technology
pulled out.
"I'm disappointed. That's about all I can say
at this point," Earnie Graham, the superintendent
and principal of Brittan Elementary School in Sutter,
said Tuesday night. "I think I let my staff down.
Nobody on this campus knows every student."
The badges, developed by Sutter-based technology company
InCom Corp., were introduced January 18. The school
board was set to talk about the policy Tuesday night
but tabled the discussion after InCom announced it was
terminating its agreement.
School district lawyer Paul
Nicholas Boylan said InCom cited the intense media attention
and concern the badges were being damaged by families
opposed to them. "They can go someplace
where they wouldn't have any risk of vandalism,"
he said.
"I'm not convinced it's over," parent Dawn
Cantrall, who filed a complaint with the American Civil
Liberties Union, told the (Marysville) Appeal-Democrat.
"I'm happy for now that kids are not being tagged,
but I'm still fighting to keep it out of our school
system. It has to stop here."
The system was imposed, without
parental input, by the school as a way to simplify
attendance-taking, and potentially reduce vandalism
and improve student safety. Brittan
appeared to be the first U.S. school district to embrace
such a monitoring system.
While many parents criticized the badges for violating
privacy and possibly endangering children's health,
some parents favored the plan.
"Any kind of new technology has the potential
for misuse, but I feel confident the school is not going
to misuse it," parent Mary Brower told the newspaper
before the meeting.
Students were required to wear an identification card
around their necks with their picture, name and grade
and a wireless transmitter that beamed their ID number
to a teacher's handheld computer when the child passed
under an antenna posted above a classroom door.
The school had already disabled the
scanners above classroom doors and was not disciplining
students who didn't wear the badges. |
Tourists and residents were unable
to use their credit cards at many businesses in the
Marshall Islands after links between the central Pacific
nation's main bank and a key partner bank were cut because
of the US Patriot Act.
The break, effective Tuesday, between the Bank of Marshall
Islands and the US-registered Citizens Security Bank
of Guam cut off the electronic verification system which
had underpinned the use of credit cards here.
Since Wednesday, many hotels and businesses have been
refusing to accept credit card payments because they
cannot verify the validity of the cards, said Phil Marshall,
an official with Robert Reimers Enterprises which owns
a number of businesses in the US.
"This is a big problem for the tourist industry,"
Marshall told AFP Thurday.
The Citizens Security Bank (CSB) was
forced to cut off the credit card verification and other
services to the Bank of Marshall Islands or face millions
of dollars in fines under the Patriot Act.
The act, introduced in the wake of the September 11,
2001, terrorist attacks by US President George Bush,
is designed to boost the ability of US intelligence
and law enforcement agencies to disrupt terrorist funding
and activities.
It notably imposes tight restrictions
on links between banks registered with the US Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and foreign banks.
Although the Marshall Islands is a close ally of Washington
and its national budget is about 60 percent funded by
the US government, the Bank of Marshall Islands is not
a US bank and does not have FDIC status. [...] |
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld steadfastly declined Thursday to
give Congress a public estimate of the size of the Iraqi
insurgency.
Under persistent question from Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona,
Rumsfeld said the disorganized nature of the insurgency
makes it difficult to pin down a reliable, specific
estimate.
"They're not static. The numbers change,"
he told the Senate Armed Services Committee. "They're
made up of different elements: criminals, Baathists,
the former regime elements, the Zarqawi network and
jihadists. Even though the jihadists are the smallest
portion of them, they appear to us to be the most lethal."
Still, McCain pressed for numbers.
"Shouldn't the American
people also know the size and shape and nature of the
enemy that we're facing, since it's their sons and daughters
who are going to serve?" he asked. Rumsfeld
said it was not his place to declassify the estimates
provided to him by intelligence services.
The defense secretary had refused Wednesday to give
such an estimate to a House committee. [...] |
A display showing an American soldier's uniform with
the slogan 'Bush Lied I Died' is seen on a home in Sacramento,
Calif., Sunday, Feb. 13, 2005.
Since Stephen and Virginia Pearcy put up the effigy,
it has been vandalized twice and put up again. Police
are investigating the vandalism reports as well as a
claim by a military mother that the display should be
investigated as a hate crime. |
CHICAGO -- The Chicago Department
of Transportation has denied a second permit application
filed by anti-war activists who want to march on Michigan
Avenue on March 19, the second anniversary of the invasion
of Iraq, a department spokesman said Wednesday.
A city hearing officer earlier this month upheld a
department denial of an application filed by the Chicago
Coalition Against War and Racism. The group last week
filed a revised application, still seeking to march
on Michigan but eliminating plans to march on State
Street on the way to Federal Plaza in the Loop.
The revised plan, which called for a route on Michigan
from Walton Street to Adams Street, then to Federal
Plaza, still would have disrupted too much traffic,
department spokesman Brian Steele said. |
The nomination by President George
Bush of John Negroponte for the new post of director
of national intelligence, in charge of overseeing all
the burgeoning intelligence operations of the United
States, is both obscene and predictable.
Negroponte, currently the U.S. ambassador to Iraq and,
unofficially, the head of the U.S. occupation of that
country, is a career foreign service officer on paper,
but in fact a veteran CIA operative responsible for
some of the blackest crimes of murder and torture in
Central America during that region's dark days of civil
war, revolution and counter-revolution in the late 20th
Century.
As U.S. ambassador to Honduras from 1981-85, Negroponte
played a key role in organizing the military repression
in that poorest of Latin American countries, and in
creating and running the so-called Contra's, the U.S-organized
military operation to undermine and overthrow the elected
Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
What makes Negroponte the perfect candidate to be America's
KGB chief is his refined cover. He has the Republicans
on the Republican-dominated Intelligence Committee in
his pocket anyhow, and as a career diplomat, urbane
and fluent in five languages, he also appeals to the
mushy national security state Democrats like John Rockefeller
(D-W. VA), Evan Bayh (D-Indiana), Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.)
and Ron Wyden (D-Oregon), who will be asked to join
in rubber-stamping his nomination.
If his appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, during hearings on his nomination for the
post of ambassador to Iraq is any indication, he will
breeze through this next "test." Democratic
Senators Chris Dodd (D-Connecticut) and Joseph Biden
(D-Del.) gushed over him at those earlier hearings,
and didn't ask anything about his role in promoting
death squad activities or in covering up human rights
abuses in Central America, which included the murders
of several dozen priests and nuns.
Americans concerned about our vanishing civil liberties,
and about the expanded use of official state terrorism
against American citizens and resident aliens should
be concerned about this appointment, however. The new
intelligence chief will be responsible for overseeing
the nation's vast $100-billion spying operation and
its ballooning, largely secret budget.
This man's record is not encouraging.
Negroponte deliberately falsified
State Department human rights reports every year of
his ambassadorship in Honduras. According to
the Maryknoll Order, many U.S. missionaries and other
religious activists were murdered in that country in
the 1970s and especially the early 1980s by CIA-trained
Honduran soldiers of the so-called Battalion 3-16, whose
operations they claim Negroponte oversaw, or "at
best overlooked."
Even The New York Times credits
Negroponte with "carrying out the covert strategy
of the Reagan administration to crush the Sandinista
government in Nicaragua"-an effort which the paper
fails to note was illegal, and which ultimately included
the trading of guns for drugs on CIA-financed aircraft.
Negroponte helped with this massively corrupt and illegal
war effort of the Reagan administration even after it
had been expressly banned by the U.S. Congress.
One would think that kind of insult to the Congress
would elicit at least some opposition to Negroponte's
appointment, but not a word about it came up during
his ambassadorship hearings (Sen.
Dodd actually said, "I happen to feel he's a very
fine Foreign Service officer and has done a tremendous
job in many places."), and it seems unlikely
he'll be asked about it this time around. |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: media@aclu.org
U.S. Soldiers Posed in Photos of Mock Executions of
Detainees; More Cases of Abuse Revealed in Newly Released
Documents
NEW YORK--The American Civil Liberties Union today
released files obtained from the Army revealing previously
undisclosed allegations of abuse by U.S. soldiers in
Iraq and Afghanistan. Among the documents are reports
that a detainee who was beaten and seriously injured
was forced to drop his claims in order to be released
from custody.
"The torture of detainees is too widespread and
systemic to be dismissed as the rogue actions of a few
misguided individuals," said ACLU Executive Director
Anthony D. Romero. "The American public deserves
to know which high-level government officials are ultimately
responsible for the torture conducted in our name."
The release of these documents follows a federal court
order that directed the Defense Department and other
government agencies to comply with a year-old request
under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) filed by
the ACLU, the Center for Constitutional Rights, Physicians
for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans
for Peace. The New York Civil Liberties Union is co-counsel
in the case.
In one file released today, an Iraqi
detainee claimed that Americans in civilian clothing
beat him in the head and stomach, dislocated his arms,
"stepped on [his] nose until it [broke],"
stuck an unloaded pistol in his mouth and fired the
trigger, choked him with a rope and beat his leg with
a baseball bat. Medical reports
corroborated the detainee's account, stating that the
detainee had a broken nose, fractured leg, and scars
on his stomach. In addition, soldiers confirmed
that Task Force 20 interrogators wearing civilian clothing
had interrogated the detainee. However,
after initially reporting the abuse, the detainee said
that he was forced by an American soldier to sign a
statement denouncing the claims or else be kept in detention
indefinitely. He agreed.
An investigator who reviewed the signed statement concluded
that "[t]his statement, alone, is a prima facie
indication of threats." However, despite the medical
report and testimony from other soldiers, the criminal
file was ultimately closed on the grounds that the investigation
had "failed to prove or disprove" the offenses.
Another file released today reports that U.S. soldiers
in Afghanistan posed for photographs of mock executions
with hooded and bound detainees, and that some of these
photographs were intentionally destroyed after the Abu
Ghraib scandal to avoid "another public outrage."
The file concerns an investigation into the discovery
of a CD during an office clean-up in Afghanistan in
July 2004. The CD contained digital images of what appeared
to be abuse and maltreatment of detainees in and around
Fire Base Tycze in southern Afghanistan. The pictures
showed uniformed soldiers pointing pistols and M-4 rifles
at the heads and backs of bound and hooded detainees,
and other abuses such as holding a detainee's head against
the wall of a cage. One sergeant stated that he had
also seen pictures on Army computers of detainees being
kicked, hit or inhumanely treated while in U.S. custody.
An Army Specialist and team leader
with four soldiers assigned under him admitted that
similar photographs had been destroyed after images
of torture at Abu Ghraib prison were leaked to the media.
"These files provide more evidence, if any were
needed, that abuse was not limited to Abu Ghraib,"
said ACLU staff attorney Jameel Jaffer. "Unfortunately,
it's now clear that the government failed to investigate
many of these abuses until the Abu Ghraib photographs
came to light."
Other photos discovered during the investigation showed
bound U.S. soldiers in what is described as "an
activity called PUC'ing (Person Under Control) a ritualistic
activity done on birthdays, re-enlistments, and similar
events, by fellow platoon members." The photographs
showed hooded soldiers lying on the ground in the dirt
with their hands and feet bound, while other soldiers
poured water on them. The act apparently simulated the
treatment of detainees who were designated as needing
extra "control."
Additional cases of abuse revealed in the investigative
files released today include:
* Senior Psychological Operations (PsyOps) officers
in Afghanistan reported witnessing indiscriminate assaults
by Special Forces on civilians during raids in May 2004
in the villages of Gurjay and Sukhagen. Abuses included
hitting and kicking villagers in the head, chest, back
and stomach, and threatening to shoot them. An investigation
into the allegations was closed, citing failure to "prove
or disprove" the offenses because the victims and
villagers could not be interviewed.
* In Iraq, an investigation found probable cause that
two U.S. soldiers committed the offense of assault when
they punched and kicked a civilian whom they picked
up at a roadblock, while a sergeant took pictures and
videotaped part of the abuse. The soldiers then transported
the man to an Iraqi prison, where they watched Iraqi
police further abuse the detainee and kick him in the
ribs before they left him there. A commander's report
was pending in September 2004, and no punishment was
recorded in the file. [...]
The ACLU's Romero urged Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales on Tuesday to appoint a special counsel
to investigate and, if warranted, prosecute civilians
for their involvement in the torture of detainees.
In related news, a federal judge earlier this month
rejected an attempt by the Central Intelligence Agency
to indefinitely delay the processing and release of
critical documents pertaining to torture. The
CIA has indicated that it will appeal this decision.
According to news reports, the CIA is currently seeking
to scale back its role in detaining and interrogating
suspected terrorists who are being held abroad. |
The US media has responded predictably
to the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister
Rafiq Hariri, echoing the bellicose threats of the Bush
administration against Syria and amplifying unsubstantiated
charges that the regime in Damascus was the author of
the killing.
Leading the pack was the Washington Post, which editorialized
on Wednesday that "The despicable murder of Mr.
Hariri benefits no one outside the rogue regime in Damascus-and
the world should respond accordingly."
The editorial acknowledged that the "crudeness
of the killing and the denials by the government of
Bashar Assad will cause some to wonder whether it has
been framed for a crime it may have desired but did
not commit." But the Post hastened to assure its
readers that the assassination was "the panicked
act of a cornered tyrant," terrified by the forced
march to democracy which Washington has supposedly initiated
in the Middle East with the recent elections in Iraq
and the Palestinian territories.
"Crude" is the appropriate
designation for the Post's arguments, which amount to
nothing more than war propaganda. The
newspaper's charges are both unsupported and nonsensical.
Their transparent purpose-much like the stories
about Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction"-is
to promote the policy of aggression which the Bush administration
is pursuing in the Middle East.
The Post's brief against Damascus is based on the
well-known detective's maxim: to
discover who committed a crime, ask the question, "Who
benefits?" Washington's newspaper of record
asks the question in order to supply its predetermined
answer: "the rogue regime in Damascus."
But precisely how has Syria benefited from the murder?
Its immediate concrete consequences are mass demonstrations
organized by anti-Syrian political forces in Lebanon
demanding that Damascus withdraw its troops from the
country, a ratcheting up of Washington's threats of
anti-Syrian military aggression, and the prospect of
Lebanon descending into civil war.
That the assassination of Hariri would produce such
consequences-all of them extremely threatening to the
Syrian government of Bashar Assad-was hardly unforeseeable.
Whatever else may be said about the Baathist regime
in Damascus, it is committed to its own survival and
its leaders are not insane.
What of the acknowledged doubt-summarily dismissed
by the Post-that the Syrian regime
is being "framed" for a crime it did not commit?
Curiously, the newspaper gives no indication of who
might be responsible for such a frame-up. Here, however,
the question of "who benefits" is definitely
worth pursuing.
The powers that most clearly
stood to advance their strategic aims by having Hariri
assassinated and blaming the crime on Syria are the
US and Israel. Among those who play the game
of speculating who organized the car bombing in Beirut,
the smart money is undoubtedly on Washington and Tel
Aviv.
Under pressure from Washington, the United Nations
Security Council passed Resolution 1559 last September,
demanding that Syria withdraw its troops from Lebanon.
This political fact sheds light on the decision of the
White House, before the blood on Beirut's streets had
dried on Tuesday, to issue a statement blaming Damascus.
This entirely unsupported charge was followed by instructions
to Washington's ambassador to slap the Syrian regime
with a demarche and leave the country.
In the midst of Washington's provocative moves against
Syria, for which the killing of Hariri supposedly provided
justification, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice declared,
with consummate cynicism, that the US was making no
presumptions as to the authors of the crime. "We're
not laying blame," she said, "It has to be
investigated."
The US media went beyond adopting an uncritical attitude
to the US response, treating the bellicose statements
of the Bush administration as though they constituted,
in and of themselves, some kind of proof of Syrian culpability.
"US Seems Sure of the Hand of Syria," read
the headline in the New York Times. NBC's Middle East
correspondent wrote that the recall of the US ambassador
represented "the first indication that the US knows
something about Syrian involvement in the assassination
attempt."
It indicated nothing of the kind. Rather,
it suggested that Washington was prepared in advance
to seize upon Hariri's death as a pretext for escalating
its threats against Damascus.
The Bush administration has in place extensive plans
for military action against Syria. Unable to crush the
resistance in Iraq-and unwilling to acknowledge that
it is a manifestation of popular hostility to the US
occupation-the Pentagon has long accused the Syrian
regime of harboring a "command-and-control"
center of Iraqi Baathists that is supposedly masterminding
the attacks on US forces. The logic of the US colonial
venture in Iraq, far from Bush's fanciful talk of burgeoning
democracy throughout the Middle East, leads to new wars
of conquest against any and all regimes that fail to
collaborate with Washington.
Various Middle East "security" experts have
been quoted in the media describing Syria as "low-hanging
fruit" in Washington's military pursuit of hegemony
in the region. The regime is viewed as isolated and
vulnerable.
Washington also hopes to use the assassination to
pursue French support for US strategic aims in the Middle
East. France, the former colonial power in Lebanon,
has its own fish to fry, and joined the US in supporting
the UN resolution demanding a Syrian troop withdrawal.
Secretary of State Rice urged closer collaboration in
her visit to Paris earlier this month, calling for an
end to the divisions provoked by the US war in Iraq.
The maneuvers against Syria manifest as well the unprecedented
coordination of US and Israeli policy in the region.
Damascus is a primary target because it has provided
sanctuary to Palestinian groups that have opposed Israel,
including the Islamist organization Hamas. It has also
failed to curb the growing influence of the Lebanese
Shiite movement, Hezbollah, which forced Israeli troops
out of southern Lebanon after 20 years of occupation.
It is hoped in both Washington and Tel Aviv that either
forcing Syrian troops out of Lebanon or carrying out
"regime change" in Damascus will undermine
Hezbollah's position and open the door for renewed Israeli
control on both sides of its northern border.
Tel Aviv calculates that the expulsion of Syria from
Lebanon or the toppling of the Baathist regime in Damascus
could bring to power a Lebanese government more amenable
to Israeli demands. In particular, both want Lebanon
to grant citizenship to the estimated 400,000 Palestinian
refugees inside that country, a move that would effectively
abrogate their right-never recognized by Israel-to return
to the homes from which they were expelled in the course
of the creation and expansion of the Zionist state.
The timing of the assassination,
barely a week after Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon
and Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas announced
their truce in Egypt, is noteworthy. It
is quite possible that any limited concessions the Israeli
regime may agree to make as part of the "peace
process" with the Palestinians will be repaid by
Washington giving the green light for Israeli provocations
and military actions against Syria.
US officials tied to Israel planned attack on Syria
The killing of Hariri has set the stage for the implementation
of plans for US aggression against Syria that have long
been nurtured by a group within the US administration
that is closely tied to Israel and the right-wing Likud
bloc, in particular. Prominent among them is David Wurmser,
Vice President Dick Cheney's adviser on the Middle East.
Wurmser played a leading role in the creation of a Pentagon
intelligence unit that sought to fabricate a case for
linking the Iraqi regime with Al Qaeda in the months
leading up to the US invasion.
In 1996, Wurmser co-authored a report drafted for
incoming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,
entitled "A Clean Break: a New Strategy for Securing
the Realm." It called for a repudiation of the
"land for peace" formula that had served as
the basis for Middle East peace negotiations, in favor
of a plan to "roll back" regional adversaries.
It advocated the overthrow of
the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein and recommended Israeli
strikes against "Syrian targets in Lebanon"
and within Syria itself.
The co-authors of the report included Douglas Feith,
the current undersecretary for policy at the US Defense
Department, and Richard Perle, the former chairman of
the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board.
In 2000, Wurmser helped draft a document entitled
"Ending Syria's Occupation of Lebanon: the US Role?"
It called for a confrontation with the regime in Damascus,
which it accused of developing "weapons of mass
destruction." Among those signing the document
were Feith and Perle, as well as Elliott Abrams, Bush's
chief advisor on the Middle East, who was recently appointed
deputy national security advisor.
This document urged the use of US military force,
claiming that the 1991 Persian Gulf War had proven that
Washington "can act to defend its interests and
principles without the specter of huge casualties."
It continued: "But this opportunity may not wait,
for as weapons-of-mass-destruction capabilities spread,
the risks of such action will rapidly grow. If there
is to be decisive action, it will have to be sooner
rather than later."
If one asks the question, "Who
benefits?" the answer is clear. The destabilization
of Lebanon, the mobilization of the US-backed opposition
to the pro-Syrian government in Beirut, and the vilification
of Damascus all serve to advance US and Israeli strategic
plans long in the making.
It is not just a question of motive,
however. Israel has a long history of utilizing assassination
as an instrument of state policy. The Israeli regime
has not infrequently carried out acts of terror and
blamed them on its enemies.
Among the more infamous examples was the so-called
Lavon Affair, in which the Israeli intelligence agency
Mossad organized a covert network inside Egypt which
launched a series of bombing attacks in 1953. The targets
included US diplomatic facilities, and the attackers
left behind phony evidence implicating anti-American
Arabs. The aim was to disrupt US ties to Egypt.
In its long history of assassinations
of Palestinian leaders, many of them carried out in
Beirut, the Israeli regime has routinely attempted to
implicate rival Palestinian factions.
Car bomb killings in Beirut
are a regular part of Mossad's repertoire. In
the 1970s and 1980s, when the Israelis invaded Lebanon,
such bombings were a fact of daily life, and many of
them were attributed to Israel.
Among the more recent killings is that of Elie Hobeika,
an ex-Lebanese cabinet minister and former Christian
warlord, in January 2002. He was killed along with three
bodyguards by a remote-controlled car bomb on a Beirut
street. Hobeika, who participated in the massacre of
Palestinian refugees in the Sabra and Shatilla refugee
camps in 1976, had announced just days earlier that
he was prepared to testify on the role played by Israeli
Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in the killings.
Last June, a Lebanese magistrate indicted five Arabs
who were said to be working for Mossad in connection
with a plot to assassinate Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan
Nasrallah. At least one of the defendants testified
that Mossad had organized the Hobeika assassination.
In May 2002, Mossad carried out the assassination
of Mohammed Jihad Jibril, the son of Ahmed Jibril, the
leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General
Command. Israeli Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer
commented cynically at the time, "Not everything
that blows up in Beirut has a connection with the State
of Israel."
In August 2003, Ali Hassan Saleh, a leader of Hezbollah,
was assassinated in Beirut. Israel denied any knowledge
of the killing, but it was seen throughout Lebanon as
a Mossad operation.
Since 2002, Mossad has been headed by Meir Dagan,
who formerly commanded the Israeli occupation zone in
Lebanon. Sharon reportedly gave Dagan a mandate to revive
the traditional methods of Mossad, including assassinations
abroad.
Washington has itself revived the methods of "murder
incorporated" that were historically associated
with the CIA, boasting of assassinations of alleged
Al Qaeda operatives in Yemen and elsewhere.
While the Washington Post and other US media outlets
echo the White House in denouncing Syria as a "rogue
regime" guilty of the Hariri assassination, the
two governments responsible for the great bulk of the
killing and political murders in the Middle East are
Israel and the United States.
In contrast to the jingoist propaganda of the American
press, it is worth noting the editorial comment published
Wednesday by the Daily Star, the Beirut English-language
daily, dealing with the broader political implications
of the assassination.
"The fact that within just hours of the murder
five distinct parties were singled out as possible culprits-Israel,
Syria, Lebanese regime partisans, mafia-style gangs,
and anti-Saudi, anti-US Islamist terrorists-also points
to the wider dilemma that disfigures Lebanese and Arab
political culture in general: the resort to murderous
and destabilizing violence as a chronic option for those
who vie for power," the newspaper stated. It continued,
"That madness has now been even more deeply institutionalilzed
and anchored in the modern history of the region due
to the impact of the American-British invasion of Iraq
and the new wave of violence it has spurred."
The murder of Rafiq Hariri
constitutes a brutal warning that the US war in Iraq
is only the beginning of a far broader campaign of military
aggression aimed at crushing resistance to US and Israeli
domination. This escalating
militarism is creating the conditions for a conflagration
throughout the region. |
Who stood to gain the most from
the death of Radiq al-Hariri?
The Lebanese stood to lose a lot from his death, as
did Syria and the other Arab countries in the regions
who viewed him as a strong leader and stabilising figure
within Lebanese politics.
However, Israel stands to gain the
most from his death as did the U.S.
Both Israel and the U.S. have been trying their hardest
to get the political group Hezbollah banned and both
have wanted Syria out of Lebanon.
In both cases the Lebanese government has categorically
said 'No'; that Hezbollah is a respected part of Lebanese
life and that Damascus is there to protect Lebanon from
Israeli aggression.
No matter which nook, cranny
or corner you look into only Israel and the U.S. stood
to gain from Hariri's death as it could very possibly
lead to some serious upset in Lebanese politics and
death.
"This is the work of an intelligence service, not
a small group," said Rime Allaf, Middle East analyst
at London's Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Many experts in the Arab and Muslim worlds believe
Israeli handiwork was behind the assassination of Hariri.
The U.S. and Israel were first of
the block and quick to point the finger of blame at
Syria - tantamount to convicting themselves as they're
the only two countries that stand to gain from unrest
being created in Lebanon.
Lebanese President Emile Lahoud and Hezbollah, who
represent two of the important factions of the Lebanese
government, both condemned the bombing and their own
experts said the blast had all
the earmarks of the bombing that was carried out by
Israel against former Palestinian leaders in Beirut
in the past.
America and Israel want Syria out of Lebanon, but the
majority of Lebanese realize the Syrian presence is
an aid to their country that helps stop the Israelis
from invading Lebanon. Something which Israel did during
the 1980's and then continued to occupy southern Lebanon
until they were ousted by the military force of Hezbollah.
Also, by killing Harriri, the
Israelis and American can both claim that the area is
more unstable and needs more American style "democracy"
and occupation.
Harriri was a giant among progressive Arab and Muslim
leaders, and during his leadership made sure the church
and state were kept separate in Lebanese political decisions.
Furthermore, he was a man beloved by all sides, even
his former political foes. They saw him as a man who
had helped to bring Lebanon back from the chaos that
Israel had caused with their allies in the invasion
of the 1980s.
It should also be remembered that
the one man who wanted Lebanon destroyed, and who led
the attack that Beirut on the brink of destruction was
none other than one Ariel Sharon, Israel's current prime
minister.
Sharon has set up a special group
of dark ops in Israel who are allowed to kill anyone
deemed to be a threat to Israel in any land in the world-clearly
a violation of International Law. Of course,
Sharon, like Bush, has decided that International Law
does not govern Israel or America.
Harriri's killing, like so many of those in Iraq, is
the work of either the Israeli dark ops or American
mercenaries who have been hired out to kill people who
are progressive in the Arab and Muslim worlds.
That is why in Lebanon today, people know that it was
not some dissident "militant group" who masterminded
this assassination; a group that no one has ever heard
of, nor does anyone believe actually exists.
But, Professor Rime Allaf is correct, this was the work
of an intelligence agency, and it's very obvious which
two agencies can carry out such an act as they represent
two countries who stand to gain the most: Israel or
America. |
Blame it on Syria. Blame it on
al-Qaeda. Better yet, blame it both on Syria and al-Qaeda.
Without a shred of evidence -
or perhaps profiting from "intelligence" amassed
by the Pentagon, the Israeli Mossad, or both - the Bush
administration immediately blamed Syria for the bombing
that killed "Mr Beirut", former Lebanese prime
minister Rafik Hariri. And Washington recalled
its ambassador to Damascus, Margaret Scobey.
Taking Baghdad to Beirut may be read for what the
denomination implies: the destabilization of Iraq -
a key Washington neo-conservative objective - exported
to the wider Middle East. What many had feared - the
"Lebanonization" of Iraq, bringing back the
tragic memories of the Lebanese civil war of 1975-1990
- might be forced, with this assassination, to happen
in reverse: the Iraqification of Lebanon.
Sectarian tension will most likely be exacerbated
- especially when one knows that sectarianism is enshrined
in Lebanon: the president has to be a Christian Maronite,
the prime minister a Sunni (like Hariri) and the speaker
of parliament a Shi'ite (the parallel is inevitable
with Shi'ites/Kurds/Sunnis trying to carve up the new
Iraqi government).
The Saudi connection
An unknown "Group for Advocacy and Holy War in
the Levant" at first assumed responsibility on
al-Jazeera television for the bombing, before another
unknown group, the "al-Qaeda Organization in the
Levant" dismissed on an Islamist website any Salafist/jihadi
involvement. "This is clearly an operation that
was planned by a state intelligence agency ... and we
blame either the Mossad, the Syrian regime or the Lebanese
regime," its statement said. The Levant (Bilad
as-Sham in Arabic) historically included Syria, Lebanon,
Jordan and Palestine, before the creation of Israel.
As far as "al-Qaeda" is concerned,
it is well known in the Middle East that Palestinians
working for the Israeli Mossad have been captured before
and posed as members of a fake al-Qaeda cell in Gaza
- a perfect justification for Israeli intervention there.
The only credible al-Qaeda connection might be related
to the fact that Hariri was a Sunni, Saudi-Lebanese
billionaire involved in all kinds of deals, some of
them shady. He remained heavily connected with Saudi
Arabia, and still kept his Saudi passport. Thus the
assassination might have been an external operation
connected to al-Qaeda's internal offensive against the
House of Saud.
Who benefits?
Only Israel appears to benefit
from Hariri's assassination. Significantly, one
of Hariri's consultants, Mustafa al-Naser, told Iranian
state news agency IRNA on Monday that "the assassination
of Hariri is the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad's
job, aimed at creating political tension in Lebanon".
An array of Arab Middle East analysts, as well as the
Lebanese government, point out that the blast was eerily
similar to previous Israeli-orchestrated bombings against
former Palestinian leaders.
International public opinion may forget that it was
current Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, then a
general, who invaded Lebanon in 1982, supported by falangists,
practically destroyed Beirut and plunged Lebanon into
civil war. Hariri was Sharon's opposite: almost single-handedly
he guided Beirut's reconstruction.
Sharon's government may now blame its fierce enemy
Syria - as it has already done - for Hariri's assassination.
Syria and Israel, technically, remain at war. Moreover,
if the accusation sticks, Sharon benefits from public
opinion turning to revulsion against Syria in the wider
Middle East. The logical progression
would lead to a joint Israeli/US attack against the
Syrian regime by early 2006 at the latest - which, in
conjunction with an attack against Iran's nuclear facilities,
compose what is no secret to anyone: the ultimate neo-con
dream ticket.
The neo-con agenda - which happens to be Sharon's
agenda - is once again pure divide and conquer: the
aim is to destabilize what neo-cons see as the emerging
"Shi'ite crescent" in the Middle East - Iran,
the new Iraq and Lebanon, with Syria as a key transit
point. A key component of this strategy is to strike
a blow against Hezbollah. It's important to note that
the new Shi'ite-dominated government in Iraq will be
a keen supporter of Hezbollah.
Hezbollah plays a very important political and social
role in Lebanese life. As for the 16,000 or so Syrian
troops, they are in Lebanon basically to protect it
against another Israeli invasion. Israel occupied part
of southern Lebanon until it was thrown out by Hezbollah.
The Syrian regime is instrumental in helping Hezbollah,
as well as an array of Palestinian armed groups. Hezbollah
may be aligned with Iran, but its intelligence, weapons
and most of all financing flows from Iran to Lebanon
via Syria. The White House and the State Department's
key agenda in the current offensive calling for Syria's
troops to leave Lebanon is to cut support for Hezbollah
- therefore leaving Israel worry-free as far as its
northern border is concerned. Washington's interest
has nothing to do with "spreading freedom"
to Lebanon.
Looking for a smoking gun
Locally, everybody is a loser with Hariri's assassination:
the Lebanese; the Syrian government; and other Arab
neighbors as well (Hariri was widely respected as a
strong leader and a factor of stability).
Syria, with its military stranglehold over Lebanon,
may be the usual suspect in the assassination. But the
fundamental question - evaded in the Bush administration's
drive to blame Syria - is which Syrian faction might
have profited from it.
From the point of view of Syrian President Bashar
al-Assad, the suspicion is a public relations disaster
because, if proven guilty, there's no way Damascus could
get away with it unpunished. On a more street-level
perspective, many Syrians are quick to point out that
the preferred method for the assassination would not
have been a car bombing. Syria has the best snipers
in the world - something even the Israelis admit.
Last September, Hariri was called to Damascus by Assad
and the head of Syrian intelligence in Lebanon, General
Rostom Ghazale. Hariri had very good relations with
Assad. But Damascus had imposed on the Lebanese parliament
a constitutional amendment extending for three years
the mandate of the current president, the pro-Syrian
General Emil Lahoud. Hariri said he was quitting as
premier. Damascus pleaded with him not to. Hariri then
joined the opposition to Lahoud.
A few days ago, Syrian Foreign Minister Faruk al-Chareh
told Terje Roed-Larsen, the special envoy in charge
of applying United Nations resolution 1559 - which calls
for Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon - that the resolution
was "en element of tension" in the Middle
East.
The official strategy in Damascus may be of a gradual
military pullout from Lebanon. But there is much chatter
in diplomatic circles and over the Internet that a serious
internal power struggle is going on. Hardline military/security
service factions, undermining Assad, might in this case
have been responsible for the assassination. Assad would
never have authorized a target killing with disastrous
consequences for Syrian national interests.
What remains is the evidence of Baghdad in Beirut.
Asia Times Online has been repeatedly told by sources
in Baghdad close to the Sunni Iraqi resistance, as well
as by Shi'ite sources in Najaf, that the paramount response
of both Sunni and Shi'ite clerics to the wave of "mysterious"
car bombings in Iraq has been to call for no revenge.
The iron-clad certainty, on both
sides, is that these have been perpetrated not by "terrorists"
as the US claims, but rather by Israeli black ops or
Central Intelligence Agency-connected American mercenaries,
with the intent of fueling sectarian tensions and advancing
the prospect of civil war. Now if only someone
would come up with a Beirut smoking gun. |
FOREIGN Minister Alexander Downer
and Attorney-General Philip Ruddock each denied today
the expulsion of an Israeli diplomat from Australia
had anything to do with his friendship with Mr Ruddock's
daughter.
The ministers issued their denials as another Israeli
diplomat, allegedly involved in a sex scandal in Brazil
five years ago, voluntarily withdrew his candidacy to
serve in Canberra.
Expelled Israeli senior consul Amir
Laty told Israeli media he believed his expulsion was
linked to his contact with Caitlin Ruddock, the attorney-general's
26-year-old daughter who lectures in accountancy at
the University of New South Wales.
Mr Laty met Ms Ruddock six years ago,
when the two were studying in Beijing, and they renewed
their friendship when Mr Laty was posted to Canberra
in late 2003, the Australian Jewish News reported.
It has not been publicly explained
why Mr Laty was expelled from his position, but the
Australian Security Intelligence Organsiation - the
domestic spy agency for which Mr Ruddock is responsible
- is understood to believe he had been involved in spying.
Mr Lati's alleged relationship with a female Defence
Department employee with high-level security access
has been proffered as a reason for his explusion.
Mr Ruddock, the key minister in charge of Australia's
intelligence agencies, said any relationship his daughter
may have had with Mr Laty was not relevant to him leaving.
"I don't believe that it is appropriate to look
at whether my daughter had relationships with anybody."
"Any acquaintance she may or may not have had
with this particular gentleman was totally irrelevant
to his departure from Australia, and his departure is
not something we're commenting on."
Mr Ruddock also declined to comment
on reports Mr Laty was due to have Christmas dinner
at the minister's Sydney house just three days before
his expulsion.
"This is an adult daughter, 26, who doesn't live
at home, and I'm not commenting on matters relating
to her acquaintances," Mr Ruddock said.
"It's totally irrelevant and I think she's entitled
to some privacy."
Mr Downer said he made the decision to expel Mr Laty
"as a result of information I had".
"I think it's been the right decision
but we did say to the Israelis at the time that we wouldn't
say anything publicly about it," Mr Downer told
Sydney radio 2UE.
"It's nothing that need now cause the public any
concern at all. And by the way
it has absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with Philip
Ruddock's daughter."
Ms Ruddock, when approached by The Australian at her
office yesterday, declined to comment on the nature
of her relationship with Mr Lati, or why he had been
expelled from Australia.
"You're only here because of who my father is.
I have no comment to make," Ms Ruddock said.
Directing all questions to the office of the Attorney-General,
she refused to divulge why Mr Lati had been banned from
attending Christmas lunch with the Ruddock family, or
whether Mr Lati had also been in a relationship with
a female Australian defence official.
"I will happily talk with you about accountancy
courses, but nothing else," she said.
Mr Laty reportedly had a reputation
for pursuing women in influential places. [...]
Mr Lati was initially thought to have been expelled
after visiting two Israeli spies who were imprisoned
in New Zealand for trying to obtain false passports.
Officially, he was employed to perform consular duties
at the Israeli embassy and his job was to provide assistance
to Israeli citizens in trouble. [...] |
WASHINGTON, Feb. 16 - As rising
instability in Lebanon increases tensions in the Middle
East, the Bush administration is arguing with European
governments over whether they should designate the Lebanon-based
Shiite group Hezbollah a terrorist organization, American
and European officials say.
The United States is already stepping up pressure
on Iran and Syria, Hezbollah's main sponsors. The American
rift with Syria deepened this week, with suspicions
that Syria might have been behind the assassination
of Lebanon's former prime minister in Beirut on Monday.
The disagreement over Hezbollah presents another challenge
for President Bush, who will go to Europe on Sunday
on a mission to fix ruptures with Europe over the Iraq
war.
In the past two weeks, the officials said, France
has rebuffed appeals by Secretary of State Condoleezza
Rice and the Israeli foreign minister, Silvan Shalom,
to list Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, which
would prevent it from raising money in Europe through
charity groups. The United States has long called Hezbollah
a terrorist organization, but the French, American and
European officials said, have opposed doing so, and
argue that making such a designation now would be unwise,
given the new turbulence in Lebanon.
Israeli and American officials say that the Palestinian
president, Mahmoud Abbas, has told them that he, too,
regards Hezbollah as a destructive force in the Middle
East, one determined to undermine peace talks by supporting
militant groups that attack Israelis.
The officials and diplomats interviewed would not
give their names, saying they did not want to be seen
as worsening tensions between the United States and
Europe on the eve of Mr. Bush's trip.
The Europeans are not solidly opposed to listing Hezbollah
as a terrorist group, the officials said. The Netherlands,
Italy and Poland support the Bush administration's view,
several officials said, while Germany and Britain believe
the issue is moot unless the French change their minds.
One European diplomat said other countries were "hiding
behind" France on the issue.
Hezbollah, which is based in the Bekaa region in Lebanon,
gets much of its financial support from Syria and Iran,
American officials say. But besides carrying out attacks
on civilians and opposing Israel, Hezbollah
also provides social services to thousands of Lebanese
Shiites and has political representatives in Lebanon's
Parliament.
"This is a difficult issue because Hezbollah
has military operations that we deplore, but Hezbollah
is also a political party in Lebanon," said a European
official. "Can a political party elected by the
Lebanese people be put on a terrorist list? Would that
really help deal with terrorism? Now with Lebanon in
a fragile state, is this the proper moment to take such
a step?"
A European diplomat said the issue of calling Hezbollah
a terrorist organization was discussed in Brussels on
Wednesday at a meeting of the Clearing House, a unit
of the European Union that meets in confidential sessions
to review terrorist activities in Europe. The group
could reach no consensus, the diplomat said.
"Nothing is going to change on Hezbollah because
we don't have an agreement among the member states,"
the diplomat said. "That doesn't mean we won't
get a consensus. I know the Americans are impatient,
but the European Union has 25 states, and these things
take time."
The Bush administration persuaded the Europeans to
list Hamas, the Palestinian militant organization, as
a terrorist group in September 2003. But enforcement
of a ban on Hamas's fund-raising and financial activities
has been left to each country, so the effort has been
uneven, European officials say. Most countries have
not made serious enforcement efforts, they said.
Now, in a measure of continuing trans-Atlantic
disagreement about how to handle the Middle East, some
European countries are questioning whether Hamas should
remain on the terrorist list, because some of its members
won municipal posts in recent Palestinian elections,
and Europeans want to encourage Hamas to enter the mainstream
of Palestinian politics. |
The former Malaysian Prime Minister
Dr. Mahathir Mohamed says that the United States might
use Israel as a proxy to launch an attack against Iran
targeting its nuclear facilities, the official Bernama
news agency reported.
Dr. Mahathir said he believes that
the U.S. would use Israel to bomb Iran's nuclear
facilities, similar to what happened in Iraq when Israel
bombed it before Washington launches its full-scale
war.
Commenting on recent developments regarding Iran and
North Korea's nuclear programs, Dr. Mahathir told reporters
that the "U.S. seems to want other people to fight
for them".
He added that Washington would attack Iran because
it thought that the latter doesn't possess any weapon
of mass destructions although such allegation were made
against the Islamic Republic.
"They attacked Iraq because they know Iraq has
no weapon of mass destruction," he told reporters
here Wednesday.
On the other hand, the U.S. is unlikely to attack
North Korea, although it recently declared that it has
nuclear weapons, said Dr. Mahathir, a fierce critic
of Israeli and U.S. foreign policies who retired in
2003.
"North Korea, the agenda is different. It is
not just weapons of mass destruction, there is also
this element of hatred against Muslim. There is a religious
element in this thing. If it is non-Muslim, the U.S.
will not attack," he said.
The former Malaysian Premier, moreover,
said that the U.S. would be more cautious in handling
North Korea's nuclear issue, fearing retaliation from
a country that has weapons of mass destruction.
Last month, the U.S. President said he wouldn't not
rule out using force against Iran it refused to give
up its nuclear ambitions.
Mahathir had always charged that the U.S. foreign policy,
under the cover of the so-called "war on terrorism",
has a strong anti-Muslim bias. |
Iran has warned it will respond
immediately to any military strike after a blast 150km
from a nuclear site sparked fears of an attack, state
news agency IRNA says.
"An attack, whatever it is, against any site,
whether it be nuclear or not, would produce a very rapid
response," Defence Minister Ali Shamkhani said
on Thursday.
"The Iranian nation would not yet have even been
informed of an attack against a site, nuclear or not,
before learning of our decisive reaction."
A big explosion near Iran's Gulf port of Dailam on Wednesday
raised speculation of military activity when local Arabic-language channel
Al-Alam said witnesses reported seeing a missile being
fired from an unidentified plane.
Earthworks
But a senior security official insisted there was no
hostile strike, just major earthworks in a largely uninhabited
area in the south of the country.
The blast occurred near Dailam, about 150km from Bushehr,
where a controversial nuclear power plant is being built
with Russian help.
Al-Alam later dropped any reference to a missile strike
from its news bulletins.
"Nothing happened in the region" of Bushehr,
said Shamkhani, accusing the media of exaggeration.
Financial market shake
Reports of the blast sent a shock through world financial
markets.
The US stock market dropped briefly and sent oil prices
higher; underscoring world jitters over Iran's nuclear
programme, which Washington says conceals an effort
to build an atomic bomb.
"This explosion basically sent chills down the
spines of futures traders," said Phil Flynn, senior
market analyst at Alaron Trading Corp in Chicago. [...] |
WASHINGTON : President George
W. Bush said Thursday that the United States would back
Israel if it were threatened by Iran, which Washington
suspects wants to build nuclear weapons.
"Iran has made it clear they don't like Israel,
to put it bluntly. And the Israelis are concerned about
whether or not Iran develops a nuclear weapon, as are
we, as should everybody," Bush told a press conference
after naming a new national intelligence director.
The US leader said the main aim was to support diplomatic
attempts to solve the crisis over Iran's nuclear program.
But he added: "Clearly, if I was the leader of
Israel and I'd listened to some of the statements by
the Iranian ayatollahs that regarded the security of
my country, I'd be concerned about Iran having a nuclear
weapon as well.
"And in that Israel is
our ally and in that we've made a very strong commitment
to support Israel, we will support Israel if her security
is threatened," Bush said. [...]
Earlier this month, Vice President Dick Cheney told
Fox News that Washington backed the European diplomatic
effort but that it had not "eliminated any alternative."
He did not elaborate on what the alternatives would
be.
In January, Cheney said he worried
that Israel might strike to shut down Tehran's nuclear
programs.
"One of the concerns people have is that Israel
might do it without being asked,"
he told MSNBC in an interview.
"Given the fact that Iran has
a stated policy that their objective is the destruction
of Israel, the Israelis might well decide to act first
and let the rest of the world worry about cleaning up
the diplomatic mess afterwards," he said. |
London - A British nuclear-reprocessing
plant cannot account for nearly 30 kilograms of plutonium,
but authorities believe it is an accounting issue rather
than a loss of potential bomb-making material, the United
Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority said Thursday.
The amount of material listed as missing at the Sellafield
plant in northwestern England was "within international
standards of expected measurement accuracies for closing
a nuclear material balance at the type of facility concerned,"
the authority said.
"There is no evidence to suggest that any of
the apparent losses reported were real losses of nuclear
material," the authority added.
In 2003, the processing plant reported it could not
account for 19 kilograms of plutonium. The plant said
that was consistent with figures published since the
1970s.
Plutonium accounts for 1 per cent of the nuclear material
handled at Sellafield, the rest is uranium. |
YALA, Thailand : A
car bomb exploded Thursday outside a hotel in southern
Thailand, killing five people and injuring up to 40
just two hours after Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra
cut short a trip to the restive region, officials and
police said.
The blast in the southern border town of Sungai Kolok
was the deadliest single bombing in a campaign of violence
that has gripped the Muslim-dominated deep south for
the past 13 months and claimed about 600 lives.
"The number of dead has risen to five now...
and some 40 others are injured," Narathiwat provincial
Governor Pracha Taerat said in a live interview with
broadcaster iTV.
Police at the scene told AFP the bomb was detonated
in a pickup truck outside the Marina Hotel at 7:05 pm
(1205 GMT), in an area crowded with open-air beer bars.
"This was a huge car bomb, with almost 100 kilograms
(220 pounds) of explosives," the governor said,
adding about four shop fronts were destroyed in the
blast. [...] |
An explosion has killed two people
and wounded six in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, diplomats
based in neighbouring Kenya said.
According to witnesses, the blast on Thursday was
caused by a bomb that exploded near a hotel in southern
Mogadishu where an African Union (AU) team was
staying.
Witnesses said all the victims were Somali civilians,
but Mogadishu governor Abdullahi Ganey told reporters
he believed the bomb had been intended for the AU team,
which has been looking at security and logistics for
the peacekeepers.
"I assume the bomb was targeting the AU mission,
but still we shall investigate who was behind this attack,"
he said.
The AU delegation, which left the capital on a previously
scheduled visit to the northern town of Jowhar shortly
after the explosion, had been due to pass by the site
of the bombing. [...] |
The Federal Government last night
refused to confirm reports that a secret bunker could
be built near Canberra to protect the nation's leaders
in the event of a nuclear or terrorist attack.
But the Opposition strongly backed the idea of such
"continuity of government" planning, even
though it is doubtful whether there would be room for
them in the bunker.
The Bulletin magazine quoted unnamed Government and
intelligence sources saying that in the event of a terrorist
attack, senior ministers, bureaucrats and the governor-general
could be taken to a bunker near Canberra.
Sites near the ACT had been considered, among them
"a secure, possibly underground, facility at the
Australian military's Headquarters Joint Operations
facility which is due to open at Bungendore, about 35kilometres
outside Canberra, in 2008".
The report said cabinet's national security subcommittee
approved "broad elements of the government post-doomsday
blueprint" in 2004, and a final "continuity
of government" plan was being prepared.
The Prime Minister's office last night declined to
comment on the report, beyond answers given on Wednesday
to several Opposition questions on notice. |
HONG
KONG : A passenger ferry collided with a cargo boat amid
heavy fog in Hong Kong Thursday, injuring more than 90
people, the government and media said.
The catamaran ferry carrying more than 150 passengers
collided with a Chinese cargo vessel off Hong Kong's
Tsing Yi Island, throwing passengers on to the deck
and leaving four people seriously hurt, a government
spokeswoman said.
Another 90 were slightly injured.
They were all taken to hospital for treatment, she
said.
Marine police launches and fire service boats rushed
to rescue passengers after the collision, which badly
damaged the bow of the high-speed catamaran.
In a separate accident, a cruise ship collided with
a boat in the east of Hong Kong's harbour resulting
in two people being tossed overboard, local media said.
The two were rescued and one taken to hospital, police
said.
Heavy fog Thursday morning reduced visibility in Hong
Kong's crowded waters to less than 100 metres (yards).
|
PUEBLO, Colo. - Federal
investigators said the pilots of a Circuit City corporate
jet were battling poor weather just before the plane
crashed a few miles from an airport, killing all eight
on board.
Though the cause of the crash wasn't known, Federation
Aviation Administration spokesman Mike Fergus said Wednesday
the flight crew was relying on the plane's instruments
used when weather doesn't permit visual landings.
The National Weather Service reported low clouds,
fog and freezing drizzle with visibility of about six
miles at Pueblo Airport at the time of the crash. The
temperature was 27 degrees.
Aviation analyst John Nance said freezing drizzle
is risky because it makes it easy for ice to form on
the wings, which adds weight and can affect handling
of the plane.
"You can overwhelm almost any airplane, even a
747 if you get into certain types of icing," Nance
said.
Two witnesses told investigators they heard loud popping
noises from the twin-jet Cessna Citation C-560 shortly
before the crash at about 9 a.m., Pueblo County Sheriff
Dan Corsentino said.
NTSB spokeswoman Lauren Peduzzi said the agency would
talk with the Pueblo Airport tower controllers to see
if the pilots indicated any problems before crashing
on the prairie five miles east of the airport. [...]
|
SUTHERLIN, Oregon - Three people
escaped injury when the small plane they were in crashed
near here Wednesday.
The pilot of the plane, Albert Satterla, 66, of Roseburg,
told Douglas County deputies that the engine of his
1981 Mooney failed shortly after takeoff from Roseburg.
Satterla turned around, came through fog and put the
plane down in a grassy, hillside pasture about three
miles southwest of Sutherlin, investigators said. [...] |
(Alabama) - Two men who died when
their plane crashed into a residential neighborhood
were on a test flight to find out if a problem with
the fuel pump had been fixed, a family friend said.
Ralph C. Herrlin, 78, of Clearwater, and Jim Smith,
63, of Palm Harbor, were killed when the four-seat,
single-engine Beechcraft Debonaire went down Tuesday
just southeast of Clearwater Air Park, police spokesman
Wayne Shelor said Wednesday.
No one was hurt on the ground, but the plane sheared
off part of a home's roof, narrowly missing a woman
and a dog inside.
The crash has stirred criticism of the small air field
located in the middle of the city near homes. In
the past 18 months, three planes leaving or landing
there have crashed into its suburban surroundings, killing
five people. [...] |
LEESBURG, Florida - All four of
the victims of the crash of a small airplane at a private
landing strip just west of the Leesburg city limits
on Monday were identified Tuesday by a spokeswoman for
the Lake County Sheriff's Office. [...]
Mysinger said the Federal Aviation Administration
and National Traffic Safety Board are expected to handle
the investigation into the cause of the crash.
The crash, which occurred shortly after 4 p.m. Monday
at Flying Baron Airport, happened as the pilot was maneuvering
the aircraft to get in position to land, said Jeff Kennedy,
Southeast Regional director of the National Transportation
Safety Board.
On Monday, witnesses told Lake County Sheriff's deputies
they believed the plane was coming in for a landing
at the private airstrip. According to Mysinger, the
plane came to rest against a fence at the end of the
runway. |
(Mississippi) - A Meridian doctor
on staff at Neshoba County General Hospital who died
in a aerobatic plane crash Saturday was remembered as
easy going.
The doctor died when the the plane he was piloting
crashed and burst into flames near Meridian, officials
said.
Dr. George Twente II and a passenger, Andy Bruno,
died in the 3:30 p.m., crash just east of U.S. 45 in
rural Lauderdale County.
"The pilot and passenger died as a result of the
crash," said Maj. Ward Calhoun of the Lauderdale
County Sheriffís Department.
FAA officials arrived Sunday morning and according
to Calhoun the remains of the plane were removed from
the scene after the initial investigation. [...] |
Near Roseburg, Idaho - Steady nerves
and good pilot skills helped three people survive a
crash landing today near Roseburg.
The small plane had just taken off from Roseburg on
the way to Lewiston, Idaho. The pilot told Douglas County
deputies he experienced engine
failure and started looking for a place for an
emergency landing.
"When the pilot got down thru the fog, he noticed
a grass strip on a ridgeback of a set of mountains west
of I-5 and put the plane down, taking off a few trees,
bringing it to a safe landing , as safe as could be
possible," said Douglas County Deputy Ken Zarbano.
"Very very lucky, and from what I see here in
the surrounding area, an extremely professional job
of picking a spot to put this plane down," said
Zarbano.
Because of the remoteness of the landing site, it
took deputies about an hour to find the survivors after
they called 9-1-1 on a cell phone. There appears to
be quite a bit of damage to the plane.
The pilot, Albert Satterla of Umpqua, and two passengers,
David Van Sickle of Roseburg and Chass Thuresson of
Junction City, walked away with no injuries. |
MILO, N.Y.- Dale Hallings was inside
his Route 14A home talking on the phone yesterday morning
when he heard an airplane engine "racing"
outside. The sound was much louder than even heís
accustomed to, living just a short distance from the
Penn Yan-Yates County Airport.
Hallings had started to walk outside when he heard
a loud bang, followed by the sight of a small, twin
engine airplane on fire up the road. He quickly called
911.
"I definitely knew something was wrong,"
said Hallings, a Milo town councilman, who lives at
2836 Route 14A.
The plane - a 1939 Grumman Twin Engine Amphibious
Aircraft model G21A - crashed around 9:30 a.m. in a
field on Route 14A, just south of Milo Center Road and
a few miles outside Penn Yan.
State Police Sgt. Steven Neuberger said brothers Paul
and Daryl Middlebrook, both of Penn Yan, had just taken
off from the local airport on a practice/training run
when they apparently experienced some engine trouble
while heading south. [...] |
A four-year-old Vietnamese boy
died from a bird flu-related disease despite not displaying
breathing problems or other obvious symptoms, Oxford
University researchers said today.
This finding has prompted fears
that avian influenza, as it is formally known, could
be far more prevalent and humans far more susceptible
to it than previously realised, according to
a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
The report concluded that avian flu is "progressively
adapting to mammals."
It comes after an investigation was carried out into
the boy's death last year and that of his nine-year-old
sister following a similar illness.
Last February the siblings, from Vietnam's Dong Thap
Province, were brought to hospital suffering with vomiting
and diarrhoea and were later said to have died from
acute encephalitis, an inflammation of the brain. Bird
flu was not considered to be a causal factor. No post-mortem
examinations were carried out.
Apart from the last day of their lives, the two children
displayed no respiratory difficulties, the report said.
But the study, led by Menno de Jong, an Oxford University
virologist based at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases
in Ho Chi Minh, found that the boy was heavily infected
with the H5N1 avian flu virus.
Samples taken after his death showed bird flu not
only in his lungs but in his blood, nose, faeces and
in the fluid surrounding his brain.
It was assumed by Mr de Jong that the boy's sister's
death two weeks earlier was caused by a similar syndrome,
but post-mortem samples were discarded and tests were
unable to prove this.
Mr de Jong said: "In both
siblings, the clinical diagnosis was acute encephalitis.
Neither patient had respiratory symptoms at presentation.
"These cases suggest that the spectrum of influenza
H5N1 is wider than previously thought."
During 2004 45 cases of avian influenza were reported
in humans, 33 of which were fatal.
The boy Mr de Jong studied died on February 17 last
year. His sister died on February 2.
The investigation found that the siblings had not
been exposed to ill poultry but that they had bathed
regularly in a canal near to their home which contained
domestic ducks.
Mr de Jong said: "The reports suggest that avian
influenza virus is progressively adapting to mammals." |
PAGO PAGO, American Samoa : Fears
were held for nine fishermen missing at sea off Samoa
and American Samoa two days after Super Cyclone Olaf
swept through the region.
Two of the men were on a vessel known to have sunk
when pounded by 190 kilometre-an-hour (119 miles per
hour) winds and 15-metre (50-foot) seas, and the American
owner of another boat with seven people on board said
he had not heard from the crew since Wednesday. [...] |
A light earthquake occurred at
10:06:18 (UTC) on Friday,
February 18, 2005. The magnitude 4.9 event has been
located in the ANDREANOF ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS., ALASKA.
(This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.) |
A moderate earthquake occurred
at 10:33:39 (UTC) on Friday,
February 18, 2005. The magnitude 5.1 event has been
located in the ANDREANOF ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN IS., ALASKA.
(This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.) |
Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in
your part of the world!
We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|