|
Printer
Friendly Version
New
Page!
Translations from other sites
New
Travel Log! The
Quantum Future Group Goes to Rennes-le-Chateau
New
Article!
Word
Control, Thought Control, World Control
911 Eye-witnesses
P3nt4gon Str!ke Presentation by a QFS member
Picture
of the Day
Foggy
Sunrise
©2005 Pierre-Paul
Feyte
A new book claims to reveal evidence
that the CIA, FBI and Aristotle Onassis hypnotised a Palestinian
man into assassinating Robert Kennedy.
It happened nearly 38 years ago, but doubts and suspicions have
lingered on. Now the circumstances surrounding the assassination
of Robert Kennedy are being resurrected and re-examined in an attempt
to establish the truth of what happened that night in the cramped
pantry of a Los Angeles hotel.
New evidence has emerged and pressure is mounting on authorities
to reopen the case of Sirhan Sirhan, who was convicted of the assassination
and who remains in the California state prison in Corcoran.
Celebrities and journalists are joining the campaign for a federal
investigation, which has been sparked in part by a new book, Nemesis,
by the British author Peter Evans. Evans, who spent 10 years researching
the book, has unearthed evidence to support Sirhan's contention
that he was hypnotised into being the "fall guy" for the
murder. Evans identifies the hypnotist, who had worked on CIA mind
control programmes and who was later found dead in mysterious circumstances.
In another move to reopen the case, a lawsuit has been filed in
Los Angeles Superior Court to stop the pantry
at the Ambassador Hotel being destroyed with the rest of the hotel
because, it is claimed, bullet holes in the walls and ceiling demonstrate
conclusively that more than one gunman fired shots at Senator Kennedy.
Both Evans and Sirhan's lawyer, Larry Teeter,
are convinced that the Palestinian activist was chosen to be a Manchurian
Candidate-style assassin. In the 1962 film, remade last year,
and based on a novel by Richard Condon, a former prisoner of war
from the Korean conflict is brainwashed by
Communists into becoming a political assassin.
Evans and Teeter believe that while Sirhan fired several shots,
none of them hit Kennedy. The assassination, they say, was carried
out by a professional hitman who fled immediately, leaving Sirhan
to take the blame.
It was only because Kennedy had dismissed his
Los Angeles police bodyguards that Sirhan survived and was not gunned
down on the spot as his controllers had intended, reports Evans.
The actor Robert Vaughn, who starred in the long-running television
series The Man From U.N.C.L.E and who was a good friend of Robert
Kennedy's, has sent a copy of Evans' book to Sirhan and his lawyers.
In his letter to Sirhan, Vaughn wrote: "It contains important
new information about your case that I believe substantiates your
claims of having been hypnotised at the time of the shooting and
also produces the first credible evidence of motivation and method.
I can tell you that, like me, important people in the US media are
persuaded by Mr Evans' revelations; some are talking of it opening
the door to a long overdue federal investigation into the assassination.
I also believe that it could give you the grounds for a new appeal."
The author Dominick Dunne, in his Vanity Fair column last month,
described Nemesis as presenting "a startling revision of American
history".
Robert Kennedy was the senator for New York, the head of the Kennedy
clan and, according to Evans, the occasional lover of his sister-in-law,
Jackie Kennedy, when his snowballing presidential campaign rolled
into California. He triumphed in the California primary, and around
midnight on 5 June 1968 in the Embassy Room of the Ambassador Hotel
he thanked his supporters. Then, surrounded by aides, hotel employees
and newsmen, with his wife, Ethel, a few yards behind and with the
cheers still ringing in his ears, he left for a press conference
in the Colonial Room on the other side of the hotel.
The route they took, from the stage to an anteroom and into the
service corridors, led them through a narrow serving-kitchen known
as the pantry. As the senator approached, a dark, slim young man
stepped from behind a tray rack. He raised a .22 calibre revolver
and squeezed the trigger. The gunman continued firing, wounding
five other people as Kennedy aides and hotel employees wrestled
him down on to a table for steaming food, where he was held until
police arrived.
On 17 April 1969, after 64 sequestered days and nights, and 16
and a half hours of deliberation, the jury of seven men and five
women found Sirhan "alone and not in concert with anyone else"
guilty of murder in the first degree. He was sentenced to death
in the gas chamber, but the sentence was reduced to life imprisonment
when the United States Supreme Court declared the death penalty
unconstitutional.
Those facts are not in dispute. Nearly everything else is.
"There was no way Sirhan Sirhan killed Kennedy," says
Teeter, who has filed the lawsuit to preserve the pantry for further
forensic examination. "He was the fall guy. His job was to
get busted while the trigger man walked out. He wasn't consciously
involved in any plot. He was a patsy. He was unconscious and unaware
of what was happening - he was the true Manchurian Candidate.
"He is absolutely innocent. He is not the person who did the
shooting. He was out of position and out of range and he couldn't
have done it."
Teeter does not know for certain who hypnotised Sirhan, but, he
said: "I know it was done. It was consistent with the US government's
programme developed by the CIA and Military Intelligence to enable
handlers to get people to commit crimes with no knowledge of what
they are doing."
Evans goes further and names the hypnotist as a Dr William Joseph
Bryan Jnr. He had worked on a CIA mind-control programme called
MKULTRA and claimed to have moonlighted as a technical adviser on
The Manchurian Candidate. The hypnosis, says Evans, had been done
over three months, a period known as the "white fog" when
the Los Angeles police task force later investigating the assassination
- and trying to construct a meticulous timetable of Sirhan's activities
up to the shooting - lost track of him.
Sergeant Bill Jordan, the detective who was Sirhan's first interrogator,
told Evans: "We took him back for more than a year with some
intensity - where he'd been, what he'd been doing, who he'd been
seeing. But there was this 10- or 12-week gap, like a blanket of
white fog we could never penetrate, and which Sirhan himself appeared
to have a complete amnesia about."
Dr Bryan was found dead in a Las Vegas hotel room
in 1978. He had either shot himself or was murdered. The case remains
unsolved.
Evans agrees that Sirhan could not have killed Kennedy. "He
got off a lot of shots and the panic in the pantry that night was
extraordinary. But the angle of the bullet holes are against Sirhan
having pulled the trigger," he said. "Sirhan Sirhan was
very volatile, very visible and the perfect patsy.
"Unfortunately, some of the physical evidence
was destroyed almost immediately because the Los Angeles police
department burned the doors to the pantry, which was an extraordinary
thing to do."
The recollections of a waiter at the Ambassador at the time add
weight to the theories that Sirhan was not the assassin. Phil Elwell,
who owns the popular King's Head pub and restaurant in Santa Monica,
recalls that his friend and fellow waiter
Carl Ucker was in the pantry that night and grabbed Sirhan's gun
hand. "He was holding Sirhan Sirhan's wrist, and although Sirhan
was firing the gun, Carl said that there was no way that any of
the bullets could have hit Kennedy," said Elwell. "Carl
told the police this and went on a lot of talk shows saying the
same thing, but nobody seemed to take much notice."
Where Evans and Teeter differ is on the question of motive, and
there they are at loggerheads.
"The assassination was staged by US intelligence for the purpose
of continuing the war against Vietnam and putting the Republican
Party in the White House," said Teeter. "The assassination
was arranged with the CIA, the FBI and the LAPD. There was a massive
cover-up. If he had lived and been allowed to run, Bobby Kennedy
would have been elected president and this was a multi-agency task
force to make sure that the Democrats didn't take the White House
again."
In Nemesis, Evans gives a totally different motive. He has unearthed
startling evidence that the assassination was carried out by a Palestinian
terrorist named Mahmoud Hamshari.
Evans quotes sources as saying that Hamshari was receiving protection
money from Aristotle Onassis to prevent attacks on his Olympic Airlines.
Onassis, says Evans, had hated Bobby Kennedy since 1953, when Kennedy
was one of the prime movers in scuppering a major deal Onassis was
pushing through in Saudi Arabia. In addition, Kennedy stood in the
way of his marriage to Jackie. She had promised her brother-in-law
not to wed Onassis until after the 1968 election because they both
knew how the American public would have reacted. She married Onassis
in October 1968.
Dr Bryan was chosen to hypnotise Sirhan because he had links to
both Hamshari and Onassis. Hamshari had visited him seeking a cure
for migraine headaches, while Onassis had called on the doctor in
an attempt to cure his sexual dysfunction, says Evans. It was Onassis's
money, says Evans, that financed both the hypnotism of Sirhan and
the assassination.
He says that Onassis confessed his complicity in the assassination
to one of his lovers, Helen Gaillet De Neergaard, when she was his
guest on his private island, Skorpios, in 1974. She confirms this
in a letter to Vanity Fair, published in the February issue. "Thank
God the truth has finally been told for posterity," she writes.
Teeter scoffs at Evans' research and describes the book as "a
soap opera". Said Evans: "I can see Mr Teeter's nervousness
about my book because I have shown that Sirhan Sirhan was there,
he had a gun and he pulled the trigger. My book is about the conspiracy
to murder Bobby Kennedy and it is putting a lot of pressure on authorities
to reopen the case. The point of the assassination is not who fired
the gun, but who paid for the bullets. Aristotle Onassis paid for
the bullets."
The 84-year-old, 500-room Ambassador Hotel, which was the site
of six Academy Awards ceremonies and where many celebrities, including
the aviator and movie producer Howard Hughes, had permanent suites,
was never the same after the assassination. Many believe it died
with Robert Kennedy. It became more run down year by year, closing
floor by floor until it finally shut its doors to the public on
3 January 1989. Its contents were auctioned off in the 1990s and
it now stands empty and derelict behind a chain-link fence on Wilshire
Boulevard.
Los Angeles officials want to tear it down and build three schools
on the site, while the Los Angeles Conservancy is fighting to save
the hotel because of its architectural value and historic significance.
The Kennedy family has argued forcefully against saving the hotel,
saying that new schools would make the most fitting memorial to
Bobby's life.
The pantry remains in the bowels of the building, a decaying space
with bullet holes in the wall and ceiling. An ice machine still
drips. Pending the outcome of Teeter's lawsuit, a panel of historians
will be appointed to consider if the room ought to be sliced out
and shipped whole to another site, preserved as it is, or destroyed
along with the hotel. |
This week, the White House announced, with
little fanfare, that the two-year search for weapons of mass destruction
in Iraq had finally ended, and it acknowledged
that no such weapons existed there at the time of the U.S. invasion
in 2003.
For many, this may be a story of only passing interest. But for
me and my family, it resonates with profound depth.
My brother was Sgt. Sherwood Baker. He was a member of the Pennsylvania
National Guard deployed a year ago with his unit out of Wilkes-Barre.
He said goodbye to his wife and his 9-year-old son, boarded a bus
and went to Ft. Dix, N.J., to be hastily retrained. His seven years
of Guard training as a forward observer was practically worthless
because he would not face combat. All he needed to do was learn
how to not die.
He received a crash course in convoy security, including
practice in running over cardboard cutouts of children. We
bought him a GPS unit and walkie-talkies because he wasn't supplied
with them. In Iraq, Sherwood was assigned to the Iraq Survey Group
and joined the search for weapons of mass destruction.
David Kay, who led the group until January 2004, had already stated
that they did not exist. Former United Nations weapons inspector
Hans Blix had expressed serious doubts about their presence during
prewar inspections. In fact, a cadre of former U.N. inspectors and
U.S. generals had been saying for years that Iraq posed no threat
to our country. On April 26, 2004, the Iraq Survey Group, at the
behest of the stubborn administration sitting safely in office buildings
in Washington, was still on its fruitless but dangerous search.
My brother stood atop his Humvee, securing the perimeter in front
of a suspect building in Baghdad. But as soldiers entered the building,
it exploded; the official cause is still not known. Sherwood was
struck by debris in the back of his head and neck, and he was killed.
Since that day, my family and I have lived with
the grief of losing a loved one. We have struggled to explain his
death to his son. We have gazed at the shards of life scattered
at our feet, in wonder of its fragility, in perpetual catharsis
with God.
I have moved from frustration to disappointment to anger. And now
I have arrived at a place not of understanding but of hope —
blind hope that this will change.
The Iraq Survey Group's final report, which
was filed in October but revealed only on Wednesday, confirmed what
we knew all along. And as my mother
cried in the kitchen, the nation barely blinked.
I am left now with a single word seared into my consciousness:
accountability. The chance to hold our administration's
feet to that flame has passed. But
what of our citizenry? We are the ones who truly failed. We shut
down our ability to think critically, to listen, to converse and
to act. We are to blame.
Even with every prewar assumption having been proved false, today
more than 130,000 U.S. soldiers are trying to stay alive in a foreign
desert with no clear mission at hand.
At home, the sidelines are overcrowded with patriots. These Americans
cower from the fight they instigated in Iraq. In a time of war and
record budget deficits, many are loath to even pay their taxes.
In the end, however, it is not their family members who are at risk,
and they do not sit up at night pleading with fate to spare them.
Change is vital. We must remind ourselves
that the war with Iraq was not a mistake but rather a flagrant abuse
of power by our leaders — and a case of shameful negligence
by the rest of us for letting it happen. The consequence
is more than a quagmire. The consequence is the death of our national
treasure — our soldiers.
We are all accountable. We all share the responsibility
of what has been destroyed in our name. Let us begin to right the
wrongs we have done to our country by accepting that responsibility.
Dante Zappala is a part-time teacher in Los Angeles. E-mail:
dante.zappala@lycos.com |
A horrifying chart and map on the opinion page
of Sunday's New York Times graphically displays the carnage caused
by the ongoing U.S. war in Iraq. Over a 14-day period during the
first two weeks of the new year, Brookings Institution senior research
assistant Adriana Lins de Albuquerque shows that 202 people died
"as a result of the insurgency."
But the chart is deceptive, leaving out at least as much as it
puts in.
First of all, and most importantly, as Lins de Albuquerque notes
in her brief explanation, the chart doesn't give any information
about the number of Iraqi insurgents killed by U.S. forces over
the same period, nor does it give figures for Iraqi civilians "accidentally
killed by coalition forces."
As she explains, "because of the limits
placed on reporters," such information is not available
(she fails to mention that also left out are the numbers of people
killed by Iraqi troops and police).
In fact, we know from reports by the U.S.-backed government in
Iraq that the U.S. has been "accidentally" killing Iraqi
civilians at a prodigious rate--a rate both higher than the rate
they are being killed by insurgents and higher than the rate that
the U.S. forces have been killing insurgents. If
that report, released late last fall, is correct, then a chart displaying
the victims of U.S.-led forces would be larger even than the one
developed by Ms. Lins de Albuquerque.
If those ratios are correct, the U.S. is probably also killing
more civilians on average than the 38 percent or total deaths (76
civilians in the first two weeks of January) caused by the insurgency.
For all the media focus on the viciousness
of the insurgents, it would appear that they are being much more
effective and selective in their attacks--killing primarily Iraqi
troops, Iraqi police, and U.S. and "coalition" troops--than
is the U.S.
Of course, most of the civilians killed by U.S. and "coalition"
forces are killed "accidentally" only by the most strained
definition of the term. The truth is that American aircraft are
dropping bombs, including anti-personnel weapons and, reportedly,
napalm, as well as 500 and 1000 lb. explosives once known in the
trade as "block busters," on urban targets all the time.
Occasionally one of these weapons will be
reported as having hit the wrong target, but even when they hit
the right target, it's safe to say that the so-called "collateral
damage" is widespread and horrific.
In addition, there are the helicopter and fixed-wing gunships,
which are designed to completely saturate wide areas with deadly
fire, killing every living thing in those "dead zones"
with projectiles that penetrate even concrete walls. When civilians
die at the hands of these genuine weapons of mass destruction, their
demise can hardly be termed "accidental."
Little wonder that the Iraqi government report found that a third
of U.S.-caused casualties are children under the age of 14.
Finally, U.S. ground troops themselves are popping off civilians
at a scandalous rate, thanks to a "spray and pray" policy
of firing off everything they've got in a 360-degree radius whenever
they come under enemy fire. Little wonder that reporters in Iraq
are at least as afraid of being killed "accidentally"
by American forces as they are of being attacked by insurgents or
of hitting an errant roadside bomb.
Little wonder also that U.S. military authorities
have a policy of not reporting civilian or insurgent death totals.
The grisly details of their campaign of slaughter
would not be popular either in the Middle East or here at home.
Or at the New York Times, where printing such a chart would have
taken up not just the entire opinion page, but the whole editorial
page, too. |
BAQUBA, Iraq : The spiralling battle between
insurgents and security forces killed dozens of people in 48 hours,
as the top US commander in Iraq predicted that violence would disrupt
landmark elections.
With Iraq's first free polls in half a century just 13 days away,
about 20 rebels ambushed an army checkpoint near Baquba early Monday,
sprayed gunfire and lobbed rocket-propelled grenades, killing seven
soldiers and a security guard, army officers told AFP.
A soldier was knelt in morning prayer in
a tiny sentry post when insurgents came up from behind and decapitated
him. Another three were burnt to death in a vehicle, the
sources said.
The killings came after the Iraqi army arrested around 60 people
in sweeps in the town of Bohrouz, south of Baquba, where the insurgency
has popular support, said local resident Akeel Mateb.
The Al-Qaeda linked group of Jordanian fugitive Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
claimed responsibility for the attack in a statement posted on the
Internet.
In another attack, seven policemen were killed and 15 wounded
in a suicide car bomb outside a police station in Baiji, home to
Iraq's largest oil refinery, a senior police officer said. [...] |
BAGHDAD, Iraq — Insurgents kidnapped
a Catholic archbishop and targeted security forces in a series of
brazen assaults Monday that killed more than 20 people. A suicide
bomber attacked U.S. Marines in Ramadi, where insurgents also beheaded
two Shiite Muslims and left their bodies on a sidewalk.
The top U.S. general in Iraq predicted violence during the Jan.
30 national election but pledged to do "everything in our power"
to ensure safety of voters. As part of a crackdown on insurgents,
U.S. troops arrested more than 100 suspects over the past three
days, U.S. officials said.
In Mosul, Archbishop Basile Georges Casmoussa of the Syrian Catholic
Church, was seized by gunmen and the Vatican condemned the abudction
as a "terrorist act." The 66-year-old churchman was grabbed
while walking in front of his church, a priest said on condition
of anonymity. [...] |
With the White House now downplaying the
importance of Iraqi elections and doing damage control in preparation
for the rise in resistance that sure to come after the imposed process
takes places in some areas of Iraq on January 30, 2005, weekend
attacks throughout the country rose as did the pressure on US forces
to leave the country. Here are some of the attacks that occurred
in Baghdad.
Eight Mossad Agents Reportedly Killed
Eight Mossad agents were reportedly killed when Resistance fighters
attacked them near the al-Hamra' Hotel in the al-Jadiriyah area
of south Baghdad on Sunday.
Resistance forces attacked the Babil Agency Company at about 12
noon Sunday. In recent days the Resistance
had been informing the people of Baghdad that the Babil Company
was a cover for agents of Mossad secret police, as could
be seen from the unprecedented security protection provided to the
company by US and Allawi police security – a level of security
not enjoyed by any other foreign presence.
The correspondent of Mafkarat al-Islam reported that the Resistance
had been informed about the true nature of the front company by
a foreign hostage, who told them that the
Jewish agents of the company were using false names to buy land
and houses in Baghdad.
At noon on Sunday, therefore, Resistance fighters armed with rocket-propelled
grenades, hand grenades, and medium weapons attacked two carloads
of the Mossad agents as they left the company building. Eight Mossad
agents were reportedly killed instantly. Four Allawi policemen were
also reportedly killed when they clashed with the Resistance fighters
during the attack. Two of the Resistance fighters were martyred
and four others wounded.
The Brigades of Martyr Ahmad Yasin declared that it was responsible
for the attack, which they called "revenge for the martyr Shaykh"
in a communiqué that was distributed Sunday evening in a
mosque in the south Baghdad suburb of ad-Durah.
Resistance Ambush Targets CIA Personnel
Resistance fighters armed with rocket launchers and BKC machine
guns attacked a US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) column on Airport
Road opposite the al-Furat neighborhood at about 10:30am Sunday,
destroying a GMC command car and a Humvee and disabling a second
GMC. Eight US troops were reportedly killed and five more wounded.
Among the dead Americans was a US official. Two Resistance fighters
were also martyred in the engagement. US forces sealed the roads
leading to the area after the attack and then hauled away the wreckage.
[...] |
WASHINGTON - As the Bush administration drops hints about
withdrawing troops from Iraq as early as this year, the Pentagon
is building a permanent military communications system that suggests
American soldiers will be in Iraq for the foreseeable future.
The new network, known as Central Iraq Microwave System, will eventually
consist of up to 12 communications towers throughout Iraq and fiber-optic
cables connecting Camp Victory, located outside of Baghdad, to other
coalition bases in the country, according to three sources familiar
with the project. The land-based system will replace the tactical
communications network the Army and Marines have been using in Iraq.
That network relied primarily on satellites and is much easier to
dismantle. The contract for the new communications system covering
central Iraq, won by Galaxy Scientific Corporation, is worth about
$10 million.
The New York Sun learned of the investment
in the communications system at a time when Washington is abuzz
with speculation that the president may this year bring home many
of the 150,000 American soldiers serving in Iraq. Earlier
this week on National Public Radio, Secretary of State Powell said
that as Iraqi security services assume more responsibility in fighting
insurgents, he would expect the number of American soldiers on the
ground there to decline. "With the assumption of that greater
burden, the burden on our troops should go down, and we should start
to see our numbers going in the other direction," he said.
Earlier this month, Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld dispatched to
Iraq a retired four-star general, Gary Luck, who was a key adviser
to General Franks in developing the plan for the invasion, to assess
America's options in Iraq. He is due to present his report next
week. Press outlets have speculated that
General Luck's visit indicates the Pentagon may be considering an
exit strategy to coincide with the January 30 elections for Iraq's
legislature. The United Iraqi Alliance, the coalition likely
to command the most seats in the new Parliament, is comprised of
Shiite parties that in the past have called for the end of the American
occupation in Iraq. The second plank of their platform says a new
government should negotiate a withdrawal date upon assuming power.
The new projects to build the CIMS network do not necessarily mean
the number of American troops would not diminish over time. But
according to experts as well as some Pentagon officials, the new
investments indicate that there will at least be some level of American
forces in Iraq for several years to come.
A senior defense policy expert for the American Enterprise Institute,
Thomas Donnelly, told the Sun that the kind of investment in the
communications system is similar to the systems established during
the Cold War in West Germany and more recently in the Balkans, two
locations where American soldiers are still serving today. "This
is the kind of investment that is reflective of the strategic commitment
and intention to continue a military presence in Iraq," Mr.
Donnelly said. "This is one of the indicators of an intention
to stay, these kinds of communications networks."
The assistant project manager for CIMS, Lieutenant Colonel Joseph
Schafer, rejected the notion that the system was a permanent one.
In an e-mail message to the Sun he wrote, "CIMS will connect
major bases serving U.S. and coalition forces in Central Iraq with
much greater reliability. CIMS will be much less costly to maintain,
reduce costly satellite costs, and free up tactical signal forces,
but does not necessarily signal more permanence."
Other Pentagon officials familiar with the project
told the Sun that its scope, which plans to eventually connect American
bases in Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and even Afghanistan,
indicates a commitment to a long-term presence in the region, including
Iraq.
"I believe this terrestrial microwave system going in, whose
final target is Afghanistan, together with such recent signals as
a new military relationship between the U.S. and the United Arab
Emirates, are further indications of the long-term implementation
of the Bush vision to bring democracy to the Middle East,"
a former CIA officer and founder of the CIA's counterterrorism center,
Duane Clarridge, said in an interview. [...] |
Abu
Ghraib abuse firms are rewarded As prison ringleader awaits
sentence, defence contractors win multi-million Pentagon contracts |
Peter Beaumont, foreign affairs editor
The Observer
Sunday January 16, 2005 |
Two US defence contractors being sued over
allegations of abuse at Abu Ghraib prison have been awarded valuable
new contracts by the Pentagon, despite demands that they should
be barred from any new government work.
Three employees of CACI International and Titan - working at Abu
Ghraib as civilian contractors - were separately accused of abusive
behaviour.
The report on the Abu Ghraib scandal implicated three civilian
contractors in the abuses: Steven Stefanowicz from CACI International
and John Israel and Adel Nakhla from Titan.
Stefanowicz was charged with giving orders that 'equated to physical
abuse', Israel of lying under oath and Naklha of raping an Iraqi
boy.
It was also alleged that CACI interrogators used dogs to scare
prisoners, placed detainees in unauthorised 'stress positions' and
encouraged soldiers to abuse prisoners. Titan employees, it has
been alleged, hit detainees and stood by while soldiers physically
abused prisoners.
Investigators also discovered systemic problems
of management and training - including the fact that a third of
CACI International's staff at Abu Ghraib had never received formal
military interrogation training.
Despite demands by human rights groups in the US that the two companies
be barred from further contracts in Iraq - where CACI
alone employed almost half of all interrogators and analysts at
Abu Ghraib - CACI International has
been awarded a $16 million renewal of its contract. Titan, meanwhile,
has been awarded a new contract worth $164m. [...]
However the controversy over abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib and
Guantanamo Bay is likely to be reignited later this month with the
publication of The Torture Papers: The Legal Road to Abu Ghraib
by Cambridge University Press, the first compendium of the so called
'torture memos' of the Bush administration.
Compiled from material already in the public
domain and other material acquired under the US Freedom of
Information Act, it documents the chilling progress in the Bush
administration's legal advice that allowed it to redefine the meaning
of torture so much that it felt able to use interrogation techniques
that amounted to the most serious physical abuse.
In one memo, Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee advises the legal
counsel to the president, Alberto Gonzales, that 'physical pain
amounting to torture must be equivalent in intensity to the pain
accompanying serious physical injury such as organ failure, impairment
of bodily function or even death'.
He adds that actions by interrogators 'may be cruel, inhuman or
degrading, but still not produce the pain and suffering of requisite
intensity [to be torture]'.
In a new development, the New York Times revealed
last week that Congressional leaders have scrapped fresh legal measures
that would have imposed strict new restrictions on the use of extreme
interrogation techniques by US intelligence interrogators.
The proposal - which emerged in the fall-out of the Abu Ghraib
scandal and complaints over the treatment of internees at Guantanamo
Bay - had been approved by the Senate by almost a unanimous vote.
It would have explicitly ensured that US intelligence officers
were covered by the same prohibitions on the use of torture, and
required the CIA and Pentagon to report to Congress on the techniques
that they were using. [...] |
WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush said
the United States had not lost credibility after issuing poor assessments
about Iraq's supposed weapons of mass destruction and that he is
looking forward to meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin next
month.
In an interview with ABC television, Bush was asked if, after he
erroneously claimed Iraq harbored banned weapons, the world would
believe Washington's claims if it depicted another country in a
similar way.
"Obviously, you know, if we were to make
a case that the world needs to act in concert with another country,
we'd want to be very careful about that which we presented. But,
I think people recognized how bad a person Saddam Hussein was,"
Bush said.
Despite the fruitless US search for WMD stockpiles in Iraq, Bush
said Saddam "had the capability of making
the weapons, in other words, he was still a dangerous man."
He said he still would have made the decision to go to war against
Saddam's regime knowing what he knows today.
In a separate interview with NBC television on
Monday, Bush said he would not rule out military action if the United
States cannot persuade Iran to stop short of building a nuclear
weapon.
"I hope we can solve it diplomatically, but I won't ever take
any option off the table," Bush told NBC.
The president was quizzed about Iran as The New Yorker magazine
reported that US commandos have been operating inside Iran since
mid-2004 selecting suspected weapons sites for possible air strikes.
The Pentagon blasted the article as "riddled
with errors." [...] |
The Pentagon has made a blistering attack on
American journalist Seymour Hersh for claiming the United States
has been preparing for possible air strikes against Iran.
But the US Government has not denied his central
allegation.
In today's edition of The New Yorker magazine, Hersh uses unnamed
government sources in an article claiming the US has been undertaking
reconnaissance missions, gathering information about Iran's nuclear,
chemical and biological facilities.
He alleges extensive planning has been under way for possible
air strikes against Iran since the middle of last year.
The Pentagon has issued a written statement saying Mr Hersh's
piece is so riddled with errors of fundamental fact that the credibility
of his entire piece is destroyed.
But the errors the Pentagon points out are
comparatively minor.
While it also accuses Mr Hersh of being unable to keep track of
his wanderings, it never refutes his central
claim that the US is considering air strikes against Iran.
Mr Hersh has since responded to the criticism by Pentagon spokesman
Lawrence di Rita.
"The last time he [Mr di Rita] and I crossed swords was over
Abu Ghraib, when I wrote about it six months ago or so," he
said.
"At that time he said ... there's not much of a story there." |
America has hobbled an effort by Britain and
other European countries to persuade Iran to freeze its nuclear
programme.
Senior officials said privately that the US would not offer economic
or political concessions to woo Teheran.
President George W Bush is trying to improve relations with Europe
and will visit London and Brussels next month.
But in private, American officials are furious
at the European Union's "engagement" with Teheran. They
say they will not co-operate with what they see as the dangerous
policy of giving the regime "rewards for bad behaviour".
The New Yorker magazine reported yesterday that teams of US special
forces had infiltrated Iran to scout suspected weapons sites that
would be targeted in future air strikes.
Seymour Hersh, the magazine's award-winning journalist, quoted
a US official as saying that after Afghanistan and Iraq "we're
going to have the Iranian campaign".
However, a senior US administration source said Mr Bush was unlikely
to take any decisions on dealing with Iran for the next six months,
while the issue was "blocked" by the European diplomatic
initiative.
Another well-placed US source said "military action is only
the last resort after other options have been exhausted".
He said Washington wanted first to exert pressure on Iran to halt
its nuclear programme through an escalating series of diplomatic
and economic sanctions at the United Nations Security Council.
Iran is widely believed to be pursuing a secret programme to build
a nuclear bomb. The nation says it only seeks to develop nuclear
power to save its oil reserves.
Under an agreement in November between Iran and Britain, France
and Germany, Teheran was spared a referral to the security council
after it agreed to suspend "voluntarily" the most sensitive
parts of its nuclear programme: the enrichment of uranium and the
reprocessing of plutonium. In return, the Europeans made a commitment
to improve relations.
Working groups met in Geneva yesterday to discuss three issues:
Iran's nuclear programme; improved technological and economic co-operation;
and "firm commitments on security issues".
The EU has agreed to move ahead with co-operation even before
an overall agreement is reached and has resumed talks on a trade
pact with Iran.
But many of the benefits that Teheran seeks - advanced technology,
investment in its oil industry and greater international acceptance
- can be provided only with US agreement.
The Europeans hoped to entice the new Bush administration into
the diplomatic process.
American officials dismiss the idea out of hand. One said the
European effort was "comical". Another said the Iranians
would break out of whatever constraints the Europeans imposed.
Washington believes that any concessions made by Teheran are temporary,
and often imposed by their own technical problems. British officials
admit their initiative is running into the sand.
Without US support, the Europeans believe their initiative is
doomed and it will be only a matter of time before the Iranians
resume their nuclear activities.
The US will not publicly denounce the initiative
but appears content to watch it collapse.
It then hopes to bring the issue to the security council. Britain
says such a move would be pointless because any sanctions would
be blocked by Russia and China. |
LONDON - Britain expects that US President
George W. Bush, during his second term in office, will take a less
unilateral approach on foreign affairs and listen more to other
governments, British analysts say.
Prime Minister Tony Blair intends neither to abandon his role as
a bridge between Europe and the United States nor London's longstanding
special position as Washington's most faithful ally.
In the runup to general elections here in May, however, Blair will
doubtlessly avoid appearing too close to Bush, who is widely unpopular
in Britain, especially among voters of the governing Labour Party.
"There is clear evidence that his relationship with Bush,
his association with the war in Iraq is an electoral liability,"
according to John Peterson, professor of international politics
at the University of Edinburgh. [...]
While solving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict was "pretty
comprehensively ignored by the first Bush administration,"
there is "more scope" for European-US cooperation in the
second term, according to Julie Smith, a specialist in trans-Atlantic
relations at Cambridge University. [...]
The Blair government is pinning hopes on Robert
Zoellick, who was appointed deputy to the new US secretary of state
Condoleeza Rice and who has been known to the Europeans as the US
trade representative.
Zoellick's is an "important post because no one really knows
from day to day which way Condoleeza Rice is going to fall on most
foreign policy debates," Peterson said. [...]
"So in a way, whoever has an influence over her has a very
important role in the policy making of this administration,"
Peterson said. |
If you live near a military base or installation,
as I do here in New Mexico, you shouldn't be surprised if terrorists
attack, drive a suicide truck through the front gates and kill a
whole lot of people.
Fair is fair, as they say, in love and war, especially war.
It shouldn't come as a surprise because the Pentagon is now attacking
the "military infrastructure" in Iran, as crack investigative
journalist Seymour
Hersh reports. Of course, when the Pentagon
says "military infrastructure," it means not only missile
sites, ammo depots, etc., but also humans, the largest and most
crucial part of any "military infrastructure."
"The civilians in the Pentagon want to go into Iran and destroy
as much of the military infrastructure as possible," Hersh
quotes a "government consultant with close ties to the Pentagon"
as saying, according to Reuters. "This is a war against terrorism,
and Iraq is just one campaign," a former high-level intelligence
official told Hersh and the New Yorker. "The Bush administration
is looking at this as a huge war zone. Next, we're going to have
the Iranian campaign." In other words, the Strausscons—who
are, after all, the "civilians in the Pentagon," put there
by Bush and Cheney—are softening up Iran, blowing things up
and killing people in preparation for another invasion, or at least
an extensive bombing campaign since most of Bush's bullet-stoppers
are busy in Iraq.
So, if "terrorists" strike the mall down the street
from where you live, you shouldn't be surprised, and you shouldn't
be angry with the "terrorists," or at least not the terrorists
in Iran, but rather those in Washington, the "civilians in
the Pentagon" who have killed more people in the Iraq over
the last two years—100,000 and counting—than all "terrorists"
combined have killed since terrorism became an excuse to for the
United States to invade countries and steal natural resources (we
can begin with the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Cuba, circa 1898).
Of course, this does not take into account the 1.5 million or so
Iraqis killed since Dubya's old man invaded back in 1991.
"We obviously have a concern about Iran. The whole world
has a concern about Iran," Dan Bartlett, a top Bush aide, told
CNN after Hersh's article appeared. Isn't it nice for Bartlett to
speak for the "whole world," a world mostly in opposition
to Bush and afraid for the future, especially those who live in
and around the Middle East? In reality, only
Bush, the Strausscons, and the Israelis are concerned about Iran,
that is to say they want to take out its government and re-install
the Shah, or his son anyway (who lives in America), and do a re-run
of what Bush did in Iraq. Problem with
this, of course, is there are three times as many Iranians as Iraqis,
they fully expect the United States, at the behest of Israel, to
attack and have spent years preparing themselves. Iran will
be, to say the least, a tough nut to crack, but with the civilian
nuts in the Pentagon calling the shots this is apparently not much
of a consideration, same way it wasn't in the lead-up to the invasion
of Iraq.
Let's be objective for a second. If the Iranians were "conducting
secret reconnaissance missions" in America, that is to say
they were blowing up military sites and killing military personnel,
wouldn't you feel inclined to respond in some way, wouldn't you
demand your government bomb the heck out of them? Of course you
would. So why do we expect the Iranians—or the Iraqis for
that matter—to react any differently? Since Iran does not
have the capability to sit off New York Harbor with aircraft carriers
or march on Washington with tanks and Humvees—the way Bush
marched from Kuwait into Baghdad—they very well may do the
next best thing to their way of thinking: attack America through
asymmetrical warfare, i.e., "terrorism."
Of course, they will not do this. It would be
stupid and counterproductive. It would give Bush an excuse to flatten
Tehran, Shiraz, Isfahan, Ahwaz, and other Iranian cities like he
flattened Fallujah in Iraq. Of course, he may do this anyway.
But if terrorists did strike New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, or
numerous smaller cities in the United States, wouldn't it make perfect
sense? How would you feel if you were in the shoes of the average
Iranian—looking west toward Iraq and taking note of the destroyed
water purification facilities, the wrecked electrical grid, the
deliberately targeted hospitals, sewage running in the streets,
knowing that you may be killed at any moment because your government
is run by people the Israelis want to rub out? I bet you wouldn't
take kindly to it. I bet you might talk about revenge.
Naturally, far too many Americans believe their country was attacked
by Muslims—brother Muslims to those in Iran—on September
11, 2001, even though there is no evidence of this, even though
it is absolutely illogical and stupid to believe a handful of cave
dwelling Muslims in Afghanistan managed to pull off a terrorist
attack only a well-organized government intelligence agency—or
any number of the 26 intelligence services with a budget exceeding
$30 billion in the United States (not to mention those in Israel
as well)—would have the resources and expertise to accomplish.
9/11 "was technically and organizationally a master achievement,"
explains
Andreas Von Buelow, a former German Defense Minister. "To
hijack four huge airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour,
to drive them into their targets, with complicated flight maneuvers!
This is unthinkable, without years-long support from secret apparatuses
of the state and industry." But never mind. 9/11 was mission
accomplished, millions of Americans believe Osama and Saddam planned
the whole thing, and Iran is the next target, or one of several
targets, including Syria and, eventually, Saudi Arabia.
As Hersh tells us, it's not simply Iran, but almost anywhere Muslims
live. Bush "signed a series of top-secret findings and executive
orders authorizing secret commando groups and other Special Forces
units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets
in as many as 10 nations in the Middle East and South Asia."
Now that Bush has his "political capital,"
thanks to the Deliverance states and Diebold, he will spend it killing
Muslims all around the world, wherever he and the Strausscons find
them. It's a dream come true for the
Israelis, who have plotted against Arabs and Muslims since the first
Zionists trekked to Palestine, determined to steal as much land
as possible and make life a living hell for millions of Arabs.
It's going to blow up in our faces. Obviously, the Strausscons
are criminally insane, and if America allows them to continue this
madness unchecked it will result in catastrophe, not only in the
Middle East but here in America as well. Our economy, thanks in
large part to Bush's invasions and the pilfering of government tax
coffers by rich people and multinational corporations, is about
ready to crash and burn, maybe this year. No doubt the Strausscons
are aware of this and that's why "covert operations against
suspected terrorist targets," i.e., Muslims, are underway,
full steam ahead. Islam has to be eviscerated before the Sugar Daddy
America runs out of money. However, there are too many targets,
limited resources, and a smoldering resentment on the part of many
Americans. It's simply a too aggressive and accelerated a plan for
the Strausscons to pull off, not to say they won't do a terrible
amount of damage before the bottom falls out.
Even so, don't be surprised if "terrorists" from "as
many as 10 nations in the Middle East and South Asia" decide
they've had enough and attack America. Of course, this will be entirely
ineffectual because America is a huge country with an easily rallied
public—polls now indicate increasing numbers of Americans,
especially in the Deliverance states, want to intern American Muslims
in concentration camps—and brainwashing directed against Arabs,
Persians, and Muslims in general runs deep, thanks to the likes
of Fox News and hate radio. Strausscons, of course, with a lot of
help from the "New Pearl Harbor" of September 11, planned
it this way. Terrorism is a good thing—as Binyamin Netanyahu
said after the attacks on New York and the Pentagon—and rest
assured the Strausscons don't give a whit about the murder of average
citizens who, as the Strausscon Lawrence Kaplan says, don't have
the "stomach" for World War IV. As
dead Israelis killed in terrorist attacks serve the purposes of
Ariel Sharon and the Likudites, so do dead Americans serve the Strausscons.
Thanks to Bush and the Strausscons, the possibility terrorists
will drive a truck packed with explosives into the neighborhood
mall has gone up exponentially.
No amount of duct tape and plastic sheeting will make a difference. |
Yesterday officials in Israel
had difficulty concealing their happiness at the appointment of
Condoleezza Rice. For Israel, Rice's appointment
is great news primarily because for the first time there is a chance
for change in the State Department's traditional attitude to Israel:
while White House officials have always tended to accommodate Israel
for political or other considerations, State
Department officials sought greater balance in their approach towards
Israel and the Palestinians.
Israel's Yediot Aharonot
Condoleezza Rice comes from a place where black is black and white
is white - not in the racial sense, but the biblical sense. Rice
comes from a region where the church instils in its faithful simple
truths of good and bad. Where Europe sees
a freedom fighter, people like Rice see a terrorist with a Kalashnikov.
Israel's Ma'ariv |
(LEBANON, Connecticut)-- Peter and Lisa Quercia
moved to town three years ago hoping to find a quiet place to settle
down, but lately their lives has been anything but peaceful.
Peter said he is feeling a great deal of resentment from town
officials after publicly expressing his opposition to the war in
Iraq.
"They have been harassing us, there's no question about it,"
said Quercia. "We're just asking for one thing and that is
to be left alone."
Quercia said town officials are harassing him because of his method
of protest to the war. Several months ago, he designed a sign listing
the number of American soldiers killed in Iraq. The sign is displayed
on the flagpole next to Quercia's home on Tobacco Street.
The most recent edition of the sign stated, "Bush Lies, 1,345,
G.I.s R.I.P." on one side and "Bush War, Death Toll, 1,345"
on the other side. The numbers reflect the death toll of American
soldiers in Iraq.
Quercia said he is currently in the process of revising the sign
and he said he would continue updating it, as additional soldiers
are lost in battle. He also plans on putting up an American flag
at half-staff, below the sign.
Quercia said he takes the sign down every evening because he fears
vandals may destroy it. He said his open political views have created
displeasure on the part of town officials and some members of the
community.
Quercia said he believes other local residents contact the town
to complain about alterations he is making to his home and his property.
He said these complaints are unfounded and the individuals who made
them do so because they disagree with his political expression.
"The town has been acting on hearsay," he said.
Quercia said he has contacted the town to find out where the complaints
are coming from so he can resolve them but the town has been uncooperative.
Quercia also said town officials and a state marshal arrived at
his home last month to deliver him a letter regarding modifications
that he made to his garage. He said the letter did not have any
information on how to file an appeal and he said it also threatened
him if he did not make the necessary adjustments.
"In the letter it said they would take further action without
notifying me about it," said Quercia.
Quercia said this is one example of the harassment he has endured
and he said it is a part of an invariable, cooperative effort on
the part of local officials to force him to move out of town.
"The town has enormous power and we feel that they want us
out," he said. "They have the resources, the manpower,
and the inclination to do so."
He said he and his wife have considered selling the home and moving
out of town, but he does not want to be forced out simply because
he chose to express his political beliefs.
Quercia said harassment from the town has also come in the form
of citations as well as the destruction of his property.
He has received a number of citations from the town regarding
property infractions in the past several months. Among them were
the presence of a stone wall officials said was on town land, an
area that extends 25 feet from the center of the road and onto a
resident's property. Quercia was also recently cited because the
bus he drives for work was parked within that 25-foot zone and he
was cited for garbage cans that were too close to the road.
He said the town's snowplow also deliberately slammed into his
newspaper boxes and his garbage cans, causing damage to them.
Town officials said they have not expressed any opposition to
Quercia's political protest.
"I don't really believe that we have harassed him in any
way," said First Selectman Daniel McGuire. "The town has
many other issues to deal with than to harass one taxpayer."
[...] |
(Florida) - Four teenagers were hit with Taser
stun guns Saturday night during an altercation outside the AMC movie
theater in Aventura, police and witnesses said.
The melee began when an off-duty Aventura police officer led a
group of rowdy teens out of the theater and was attacked by another
group of youths, said Aventura Police Chief Thomas Ribel.
By the time it ended, two officers had been injured and 11 or
12 people had been arrested on charges ranging from trespassing
to battery on a police officer, Ribel said.
Two of the teenagers hit with stun guns, which
shoot out 50,000 volts of electricity -- are 17, the chief said.
One is 16 and the other is 19, he said.
The episode comes on the heels of several controversial uses of
stun guns on minors and a policy revision by the Miami-Dade Police
Department, which came under fire last year for using stun guns
on a 6-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl.
Last week, the county said it had revised its policy and, while
not banning the use of stun guns on minors, it calls on officers
to consider such factors as age and size and body language and prohibits
the use of stun guns as a "tool of coercion, to intimidate
an individual into compliance with simple requests or directives.''
Ribel told The Herald that his department's 10-page stun-gun policy
was cited by the Miami-Dade community relations board as a model
policy for the county. It bans the use of stun guns on pregnant
women and children younger than 12, he said.
''We have a lot of restrictions in our policy. We have a Taser
program supervisor that will review every Taser, and we require
strict documentation of every Taser discharge,'' Ribel told The
Herald in a telephone interview.
RESPONDED TO CALL
Aventura police officers got an emergency call for assistance
from an off-duty officer working at the AMC Aventura 24, 19501 Biscayne
Blvd., about 10:40 p.m. after a fight broke out in one of the 24
theaters, Ribel said.
''The officer requested emergency back up, and it's my understanding
that the initial arrest of combatants was made when other people
in the crowd jumped on the officers when they were escorting the
subjects out of the mall,'' the chief said.
"It escalated. It started out bad and got worse.''
One Aventura officer was treated for a knee injury at an area
hospital and released and another was struck in the head but was
not taken to a hospital, Ribel added.
The use of the stun guns will be investigated, Ribel told The
Herald.
''We . . . review every Taser discharge and every Taser gun so that
what is reported by the officers is matched against the evidence,''
Ribel said. "The Taser has a documentation process. They have
a computer chip that records every discharge and we will fully investigate
every discharge.''
Ryan Pedro, a Miramar High student who was arrested but not stunned,
said 10 juveniles and two 18-year-olds were taken into custody.
The 15-year-old told The Herald on Sunday that he and a cousin
had just seen the comedy Meet The Fockers.
'I called my aunt to come pick us up, and we were walking out
and the police officers start rushing up to us, screaming, `Get
the f--- out of here! Get the f--- out of here!' One
of them said if I don't leave now he's going to hit me with the
billy stick,'' Ryan told The Herald in a telephone interview.
''While this is happening, I never stop moving. I am getting out
of there,'' Ryan said.
HANDCUFFED, CHARGED
''Suddenly, one of them grabs me by the back of my neck and throws
me on the hood of the car. They put plastic cuffs on me and took
me to a police car and threw me in there,'' Ryan said.
"They busted one kid's head -- gave him
a six-inch gash on his head with a billy club.''
Ryan said he was charged with trespassing. His cousin, Giovanni
Velez, was not stunned either but was charged with disorderly conduct,
his mother said. She is the aunt that Ryan called to pick them up.
''When we got to the mall, I knew something was wrong,'' Lynette
Sheppard told The Herald. "My son wasn't answering his cellphone.
''One of the security officers told my husband there was a fight
and a bunch of kids were arrested,'' Sheppard said. "One of
the witnesses told us about one of the kids that was getting Tasered
and the description could match my nephew.''
When she went to the Aventura Police Department, two officers
were in the lobby talking to frantic parents, she said.
''The only thing they would tell us was that all the kids were
resisting arrest. They couldn't tell us what my child or my nephew
was arrested for. We had no idea what was going on with our kids,''
Sheppard told The Herald in a telephone interview.
Said Ryan: "All we were doing was trying to go see a movie.'' |
BEIRUT (AP) - Israeli warplanes twice bombed
suspected Hezbollah targets along the border in southern Lebanon
on Monday, wounding two women, after guerrillas blew up an Israeli
bulldozer in a disputed area near the frontier, Lebanese officials
said.
Israeli artillery pounded positions in the disputed Chebaa Farms
area, where the bulldozer attack took place, before fighter jets
raided two other Lebanese border regions. The flare-up near Israel's
northern border comes as the Palestinian Authority tries to rein
in Palestinian militants responsible for attacks in southern Israel.
The Lebanese security officials, speaking on condition of anonymity,
said two Lebanese women were injured after Israeli planes fired
two missiles at targets in Qsair, an area about six kilometres from
the Israeli border.
Hours later, another jet fired a missile at Wadi Izziyeh, an area
where Hezbollah maintains positions between the southern port city
of Tyre and the border town of Naqoura on the Mediterranean coast.
There was no word on casualties, but a plume of smoke was seen billowing
from the bombed area.
Earlier, Hezbollah's Al-Manar television said Hezbollah forces
planted a bomb that destroyed a bulldozer in the Chebaa Farms area.
It said there were "definite casualties" among the Israelis,
adding that Israeli ambulances rushed to the scene.
But the Israeli army said there were no casualties in the bulldozer
attack, which it said took place inside Israeli territory.
The Israelis issued a statement saying its air force "targeted
two sites in southern Lebanon belonging to Hezbollah" after
the militant group claimed responsibility for the bulldozer attack.
"The Israeli Defence Forces will continue to act with determination
against any attempt to target Israelis and destabilize the region,"
the statement added.
Lebanese security officials said at least 25 Israeli artillery
shells landed near the village of Kfar Chouba near the Chebaa Farms,
following the bulldozer attack. Israeli officials said the Hezbollah
strike was the group's third in the area in eight days.
The attacks include a Jan. 9 Hezbollah roadside bombing that killed
an Israeli soldier. Israeli artillery retaliation killed a French
officer serving with the United Nations and wounded a Swedish officer
and a Lebanese man. A Hezbollah fighter also was killed.
Hezbollah issued a statement later Monday saying the bulldozer
bombing was in retaliation for "repeated Israeli aggression,"
claiming Israeli artillery gunners have shelled the area numerous
times recently.
The Lebanon-Israel border has been largely quiet since Israel
withdrew its forces from southern Lebanon in May 2000 after an 18-year
occupation.
But Hezbollah, who took control of the Lebanese border areas,
has occasionally attacked Israeli troops in the Chebaa Farms area
where the borders of Lebanon, Syria and Israel meet.
Lebanon, backed by Syria, claims the area. Israel captured the
territory when its forces seized Syria's Golan Heights in the 1967
Middle East war before annexing the area. The UN says the region
is Syrian and that Syria and Israel should negotiate its fate. |
Israel will give new Palestinian
leader Mahmud Abbas a limited amount of time to allow him to crack
down on resistance groups, a source close to Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon has said.
"We are according Abu Mazin (Abbas) a limited delay to let
him decide whether to fight against terrorism," the source
said on Tuesday.
"If he does not change the rules of the game, then the Palestinians
will pay an enormous price." [...]
Israeli army radio reported on Monday that chief of staff Moshe
Yaalon had demanded that plans be drawn up for a large-scale land
operation in Gaza if attacks continue.
"As the elected president, he must choose whether to remain
hostage to the terrorists and do nothing or to decide to act against
them."
The official said that Abbas could decide to deploy "30,000
armed men in the areas of the Gaza Strip where the terrorists fire
rockets and mortar shells against Israeli territory or the settlements".
Palestinian security sources say they have received orders from
Abbas for intensive deployments of security forces around the border
crossings in Gaza into Israel. |
LOS ANGELES : Thirty-two Chinese stowaways
were found in two cargo containers in Los Angeles after surviving
a nearly two-week ocean journey from Hong Kong, officials said.
The 32 would-be illegal immigrants were taken into custody on
Saturday after a crane operator in Los Angeles port spotted three
men climbing out of a hole cut in the side of a container, police
said.
The containers with the men inside were loaded onto the ship two
weeks ago in Shekou, China, police said. The men were in good health,
officials said.
The stowaways, all men, had equipped the containers with supplies
and ventilation to allow them to survive the perilous journey across
the Pacific Ocean, said Los Angeles Port Police Lieutenant Titus
Smith said.
"They had ventilation holes cut into the bottom of the container.
They had a fan system set up that ran on batteries, they had ample
food and water, juices, sleeping bags," he said.
The group of 28 adults and four teenagers lived inside two 40-foot
long shipping containers, according to the Department of Homeland
Security.
The men were aboard the ship NYK Athena, but police said that
it did not appear that the vessel's crew was aware of their illegal
passengers, Smith added.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials are investigating
the stowaways pending a decision on their fate and will work with
Chinese authorities to repatriate them. |
Bangkok's new subway shut down for a week
after train crash
BANGKOK : Two trains on Bangkok's six-month-old subway system crashed
during the morning rush hour Monday, injuring around 100 people
and forcing authorities to suspend services, officials and witnesses
said.
The accident happened around 9:30 am (0230 GMT), when a train
headed to the country's main rail hub Hua Lam Pong was leaving Thailand's
cultural center station, Major General Dusitsan Teraphat, Bangkok's
deputy police commissioner, told Thai television.
The train loaded with some 700 passengers was hit from behind
by a second train that was empty, he said.
"Initial reports said almost 100 people were injured. Police
and authorities rescued all passengers from the train," Dusitsan
said. [...] |
CONCEPCION, CHILE - Three young men who ran
along a Chilean beach shouting a false warning that a tsunami was
on its way sent thousands of panicked people scrambling for the
hills Monday.
The stunt – carried out at about 2 a.m. on a beach in the
southern city of Concepcion – was a "bad joke,"
said the regional governor, Rodrigo Diaz.
He said as many as 12,000 people fled their homes in fear of a
tsunami like the one that killed more than 150,000 people in Indian
Ocean countries three weeks ago.
TV broadcasts from the city – Chile's third largest –
showed crowds of people running through the streets toward nearby
hills.
Others toppled off overcrowded cars and trucks as they tried to
escape the city 500 kilometres south of the capital Santiago.
Many people were taken to hospital with symptoms of shock, and
police reported a number of traffic accidents.
Hours after the false alarm, some people remained in the hills
around the city despite the governor's appeals that they return
home. |
The United Nations has increased security for
its workers in Indonesia's Aceh province following a Danish government
warning of "imminent" terror attacks.
Meanwhile, Sri Lanka has added a further 7,275 people to its death
toll, taking the country's total to more than 38,000 and raising
the overall figure for the Boxing Day disaster beyond 175,000.
"The U.N. security team in Banda Aceh has today instructed
all UN staff to observe a heightened awareness and take all security
precautions necessary," said Christian Berthiaume, Geneva spokeswoman
for the United Nations' World Food Program.
The UN acted following a warning from the Danish foreign ministry
that rescue workers and troops in Aceh are at risk from terror attacks.
Niels Erik Andersen, a Danish Foreign Ministry official, said:
"We have received information from sources abroad that somebody
would be planning an attack today."
Indonesia's foreign minister dismissed the report as an "unfounded
rumour". [...] |
Another earthquake and tsunami can
be expected to strike the area of south Asia devastated on Boxing
Day within the next 50 years, a British Government minister warned
today. [...]
Mr Thomas told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme: “It is about
trying to get better early warning systems in place, not least because
we think there will be another earthquake and possibly another tsunami
in the same part of the world at some point in the next 50 years.
“Obviously, we want to be better prepared for that.
“Also, we know that an average of 60,000 people die a year
from natural disasters. Many of those lives could be saved, not
only if there were better early warning systems in place, but also
if countries were better able to respond to these disasters.” |
More steps are needed to prevent
a catastrophe. Tokyo is the political and business center of Japan.
If the capital is hit hard by a great earthquake, it will not only
devastate the country as a whole but would also seriously affect
world affairs.
At 6 p.m. on a winter day, the areas around Shinjuku in Tokyo where
skyscrapers are concentrated will be overflowing with people. Traffic
jams will fill up the roads, and trains will be packed to their
fullest capacity. What would happen if an earthquake took place
under such conditions?
If a quake with an intensity of upper 6 on the Japanese scale of
7 hit the area inside the Yamanote railway loop line, people would
be unable to stand as they are pushed upward by the buckling ground.
Ramshackle buildings would collapse and broken windows would rain
shards of glass on the people below.
Residents will try to shut off their gas, but will they be able
to do so in time? An estimated 180,000 houses and other buildings
would collapse in Tokyo and surrounding prefectures, including practically
all the old homes, because of trembling and liquefaction of the
ground.
About 4,000 people will have died by this stage.
But then fires would spread from the destroyed buildings. About
40,000 people will be trapped inside buildings or under fallen furniture.
Some 610,000 houses and other structures will burn down and 8,000
people will die in the blazes. The combined total of the death toll
would reach 12,000.
Where should people dive for cover? Even if they survive the quake,
they will be thrown into chaos. Mobile phones will not work and
millions of stranded people who cannot go home will have to spend
the night in a pitch-dark city.
This is the picture that the government's Central Disaster Management
Council draws if Tokyo is hit by an earthquake with a magnitude
of 7 on the Richter scale.
Many think the destruction will be much greater. [...]
The Tokyo metropolitan area has not been hit by a large earthquake
in the 82 years since the Great Kanto Earthquake. But we cannot
rely on good luck indefinitely. |
Israel will give new Palestinian
leader Mahmud Abbas a limited amount of time to allow him to crack
down on resistance groups, a source close to Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon has said.
"We are according Abu Mazin (Abbas) a limited delay to let
him decide whether to fight against terrorism," the source
said on Tuesday.
"If he does not change the rules of the game, then the Palestinians
will pay an enormous price." [...]
Israeli army radio reported on Monday that chief of staff Moshe
Yaalon had demanded that plans be drawn up for a large-scale land
operation in Gaza if attacks continue.
"As the elected president, he must choose whether to remain
hostage to the terrorists and do nothing or to decide to act against
them."
The official said that Abbas could decide to deploy "30,000
armed men in the areas of the Gaza Strip where the terrorists fire
rockets and mortar shells against Israeli territory or the settlements".
Palestinian security sources say they have received orders from
Abbas for intensive deployments of security forces around the border
crossings in Gaza into Israel. |
LONDON, January 18 (newratings.com)
– The northern Japanese island of Hokkaido was hit Tuesday
evening by an earthquake measuring 6.3 on the Richter scale.
According to the Japanese TV station NHK, the earthquake hit Japan's
most northern island at 11:06 pm. There have been no reports of
any injuries or damages. Japan’s Meteorological Agency said
that there is no danger of tsunamis resulting from the earthquake. |
An earthquake measuring 6.6 on the Richter
scale has been detected off the Pacific island group of Micronesia,
according to the Hong Kong observatory.
"The epicentre was initially determined to be over the seas
of the western part of Micronesia, about 330 kilometres east-northeast
of [the island of] Yap," the observatory said in a statement.
The quake, classified in Hong Kong as "severe", was
recorded at 6:24 am AEDT, it said.
There were no immediate reports of tsunamis or damage on nearby
islands. |
SEATTLE -- Rain, wind, ice, sleet and snow
buffeted Washington on Monday, bringing ice storms to much of the
Cascades and Eastern Washington and a threat of serious flooding
in the western half of the state.
The National Weather Service issued flood warnings for the Nooksack,
Satsop, Skagit, Skykomish, Snoqualmie, Stillaguamish and Tolt rivers
in the Puget Sound area, and for the Bogachiel River near La Push
and the Skokomish River in Mason County.
Heavy rains were forecast to continue through Wednesday in Western
Washington, with up to 10 inches total for the storm in some areas.
That could cause major flooding of many rivers, the weather service
said. [...] |
LONDON, January 18 (newratings.com)
– The northern Japanese island of Hokkaido was hit Tuesday
evening by an earthquake measuring 6.3 on the Richter scale.
According to the Japanese TV station NHK, the earthquake hit Japan's
most northern island at 11:06 pm. There have been no reports of
any injuries or damages. Japan’s Meteorological Agency said
that there is no danger of tsunamis resulting from the earthquake. |
ROCHESTER, N.Y. - A deep Arctic freeze refused
to relinquish its grip over the Northeast and Midwest early Tuesday,
keeping teeth chattering and temperatures at bone-chilling lows.
At least three weekend deaths were blamed on the cold in Michigan.
After a relatively mild winter in the Northeast, brisk winds made
it feel as cold as minus-20 degrees in western New York and minus-45
degrees in the Adirondacks in northern New York.
"To some people this is quite a shock, but much of our hardy
upstate population is used to this. They knew it would come eventually,"
Buffalo's chief meteorologist, Tom Niziol, said Monday.
Cold air rushing over Lake Ontario and Lake Erie produced as much
as 14 inches of snowfall in ski-resort communities in western and
central New York.
Upstate New York "has had a great winter so far — now
we're getting the real deal!" James Lattimore said cheerfully
as he cleared a half-foot of snow off the pavement in front of his
brother's apartment in Rochester's Corn Hill section.
The cold blast will extend through Tuesday, with temperatures spiking
as high as 30 degrees Wednesday. "Then we go back into a deep
freeze for the end of the week with temperatures not making it out
of the teens," Niziol said.
Temperatures were well below normal Tuesday
across Michigan, the National Weather Service said. Detroit
Metropolitan Airport, where the normal low is 17 degrees, had an
early Tuesday reading of 1 degree.
In Michigan's Wayne County, a man in his 50s who was believed to
be homeless was found frozen to death Sunday in a grassy area near
a sidewalk.
In Oceana County in western Michigan, a 24-year-old man and a 19-year-old
woman were found dead Saturday, apparently from carbon monoxide
from a propane heater used to heat a trailer.
The frozen body of Kathryn Jeanne Gates was found in Minneapolis
on Sunday morning, hours after her motorized scooter tipped over
and she was unable to get back up, police said. Overnight temperatures
were below zero. An autopsy was planned for Tuesday to determine
the cause of death.
On Monday, the mercury in Minnesota flirted
with the state's record low. The temperature dropped to 54 degrees
below zero in Embarrass — not cold enough for a record,
but cold enough to drive homeless people into shelters and cause
hundreds of car batteries to fail.
The chill was felt as far south as Florida, where
low temperatures Tuesday morning were reported in the high 20s and
low 30s for northern Florida. |
Las Tunas, Water reservoirs in Cuba's eastern
province of Las Tunas contain a mere 24 percent of their storage
capacity —352.9 million cubic meters-, according to the local
office of the Institute of Hydraulic Resources.
The entity has warned that if the adverse climatic situation continues
it will become much more complicated to supply the vital liquid
to the population, as well as the agricultural and industrial sectors.
The severe drought has dealt a serious blow to both farming and
ranching. [...] |
Quantum
Future
Remember,
we need your help to collect information on what is going on in your part
of the world! We also need help to keep
the Signs of the Times online.
Send
your comments and article suggestions to us
Fair Use Policy Contact Webmaster at signs-of-the-times.org Cassiopaean materials Copyright ©1994-2014 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk Republication and re-dissemination of our copyrighted material in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
. |