OF THE
TIMES
Cull your mum and then yourself and we might consider it. Go on then.
I was leaning more toward Israeli Stupidity, but your mileage may vary.
No way!! Really?? How interesting!! (Sarcasm). Don't care about the WEF, or any non-government (or government), unelected, charity, shithouse...
In March of 2016 I experienced an hour of non-stop turbulence onboard an Airbus A380. The plane was flying not too far from the Himalaya Mountains...
what was not mentioned is the fact that Campi Flegrei is the biggest Super Volcano in Europe, and some people in the field consider it the most...
To submit an article for publication, see our Submission Guidelines
Reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the volunteers, editors, and directors of SOTT.net or the Quantum Future Group.
Some icons on this site were created by: Afterglow, Aha-Soft, AntialiasFactory, artdesigner.lv, Artura, DailyOverview, Everaldo, GraphicsFuel, IconFactory, Iconka, IconShock, Icons-Land, i-love-icons, KDE-look.org, Klukeart, mugenb16, Map Icons Collection, PetshopBoxStudio, VisualPharm, wbeiruti, WebIconset
Powered by PikaJS ๐ and InยทSite
Original content © 2002-2024 by Sott.net/Signs of the Times. See: FAIR USE NOTICE
Reader Comments
Just taking exception with other "inaccuracies" of the article: This makes it sound like redundant hardware in the FDS controller system.
But actually, the author is just a jounalist (a.k.a. moron), and don't understand what he is writing about. Wackopedia states something different : [Link] As one memory chip represents just a fraction of the totally available memory (and memory space), a repair would involve a re-build of the application which avoids the damaged memory space. (Which is only possible if the damaged fraction is "horizontal", not "vertical" ...).
Which in turn presumes that Nasa still has a working environment for the toolchain to rebuild the application, and an identical target system at site to test it. And old geezers that still know how that works ...
Planet X has been known about for a few centuries. All the top astronomers throughout our history have done the maths. They all began looking for it during their careers. They can't all be wrong.
Just a quick search reveals this, although this isn't the report i read. I'm still looking for that.
[Link]