Judge Walker just dismissed USA v. Letitia James—but NOT on the merits.

He ruled Lindsey Halligan's appointment violated the Appointments Clause. That's it.

NOT vindictive prosecution.
NOT "fringe blogger."
NOT Pulte misconduct.
NOT lack of evidence.

Dismissed WITHOUT…

— Sam E. Antar (@SamAntar) November 24, 2025
Judge Walker just dismissed USA v. Letitia James—but NOT on the merits.

He ruled Lindsey Halligan's appointment violated the Appointments Clause. That's it.

NOT vindictive prosecution.
NOT "fringe blogger."
NOT Pulte misconduct.
NOT lack of evidence.

Dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

That means DOJ can re-indict tomorrow with a properly appointed U.S. Attorney.

Meanwhile, the evidence doesn't disappear:

✓ Her text: "it looks suspicious"
✓ Her tax returns claiming investment property
✓ Her financial disclosures
✓ Her bank records showing hotel stays
✓ Her niece's utility registration

Lowell filed 50 pages attacking me, Pulte, and the investigation's origins.

Judge Walker ignored all of it.

He ruled on a technicality DOJ can fix in 24 hours.

Letitia James is not exonerated. She's not acquitted. She's not vindicated.

She's in the same position as before—except now the evidence is public, the DOJ Response is on the record, and everyone knows what's in her own documents.

The documents don't have an Appointments Clause problem.

The fraud is still fraud. .....