And yet, Child Protective Services has the legal right to charge parents with medical neglect for refusing to give their child a known neurotoxic or psychotoxic drug that wasn't adequately tested either in the animal lab or in long-term clinical trials prior to being given marketing approval by the FDA.
Comment: There is much evidence to support the fact that Child Protective Services is not the best advocate for children. Actually, CPS often puts children at great risk. The agency has used lame excuses to remove children from homes where they are safe and well-cared for, then placed them in very dangerous circumstances and sometimes has lost track of them completely.
- Foster children in CPS custody are being enrolled in drug experiments without parental consent
- Child Protective Services children found in human trafficking sex trade
- Endless war on children: Exposing child 'protective services' abuses
- SOTT Radio - The Truth Perspective #20: Tammi Stefano - The Truth About Child Protective Services
This makes no sense to parents and can't be explained by their lawyers, especially if the parents know more than their medical caregivers about the multitude of potentially serious dangers that such drugs could pose for their child. It is worth noting that psychiatrists admit that there is no scientific test in existence that proves that children deserve a permanent mental illness label (and getting brain-altering drugs for the rest of their lives).
Indeed, making a psychiatric diagnosis in this big business era of high volume/high turnover patient care is based largely on an unscientific, sometimes absurd checklist of patient behaviors, emotions or thoughts, often hurriedly obtained after a relatively short office visit. Checklists of signs or symptoms of a newly thought-up "mental illness" periodically are composed at the annual meetings of the American Psychiatric Association where the newly invented "disorder" is voted on (by a show of hands) by groups of volunteer psychiatrists, most of whom have financial and/or professional conflicts of interest. If a sufficient majority of convention attendees agree, the new diagnosis is then placed in the next Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), which contains hundreds of other unscientific check-lists of "mental disorders".















Comment: