Health & Wellness
Original video by Griesz-Brisson
Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD is a Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist with a PhD in Pharmacology, with special interest in neurotoxicology, environmental medicine, neuroregeneration and neuroplasticity. This is what she has to say about facemasks and their effects on our brains:
Proponents such as the American Dental Association and the Oral Health Division of the Centers for Disease Control have spent millions of dollars on promotion1 and public relations2 to sell fluoridation using half-truths and misleading talking points.
While the U.S. is still trying to hold on to the fallacy that water fluoridation is a public health service, it's one of the most widely rejected health interventions in the world, with 95% of the global population consuming nonfluoridated water.
Comment: See also:
- #FluorideTrial: Scientist says he was threatened because of fluoride study - Week 1 in review
- Historical court case: The fluoride cover up will soon be exposed
- Study reveals how too much fluoride causes defects in tooth enamel
- Objective:Health - ITN: Fluoride Makes You Stupid | RFK JR Hits Back | Tech Censorship
- Remember the conspiracy theory that fluoride makes you docile and stupid? Well, it's official now
- Why do you want to poison me? Iowa town bans fluoride as chemical's danger becomes increasingly apparent
- Water fluoridation: Facts & fallacies
- Why adding fluoride to water should be halted immediately
She was pregnant, I'd guess in the 2nd trimester. According to the US NIOSH (National Institute for Safety and Health) there are now millions of pregnant women wearing masks — primarily because they're mandated to do so. But there doesn't appear to be any data for how long they're worn and under what circumstances, i.e. indoors, outdoors, working, exercising or whatever.
Given what I've learned about masks I had a strong urge to warn her that there were serious risks to her and I assumed the unborn baby. I assumed because I really didn't know. The problem is there are virtually no reliable studies which link mask wearing to postnatal outcomes. But as I've come to understand the lack of a specific study need not inhibit an accurate risk/benefit analysis. So let's do that.
The wearing of masks to attempt to prevent the spread of a virus has never been widespread in the general population in the Western world. (An exception to that was during the 1918 flu pandemic, masks were mandated in some cities, USA, but not others.
Subsequent studies showed no difference in infection rates or deaths between the mask wearing cities and those that chose not to.) In Asia where mask wearing is more common they are worn for a multitude of reasons including, significantly, for protection against car exhaust and industrial air pollution. Most studies everywhere have concentrated on "fit for purpose" or effectiveness analyses.
Comment: See also:
- The Science of Masks
- Still no conclusive evidence justifying mandatory masks
- A classic fallacious argument: "If masks don't work, then why do surgeons wear them?"
- Dr Mercola Interviews Denis Rancourt: 'There is no Scientific Evidence That Facemasks Inhibit Viral Spread'
- Mandatory mask wearing is silent terrorism meant for psychological submission
The patient, who is in her 40s, had an undiagnosed rare condition and the test she received may have been carried out improperly, a sequence of improbable events that means the risk from nasal tests remains very low.
But her case showed health care professionals should take care to follow testing protocols closely, Jarrett Walsh, senior author of the paper that appeared in JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, told AFP.
People who've had extensive sinus or skull base surgery should consider requesting oral testing if available, he added.
Published in the New England Journal of Medicine on Thursday, the paper outlines strategies for circumventing widespread fears over the safety of a rushed-to-market vaccine against the novel coronavirus, providing health authorities with a playbook for coercing a skittish populace.
The writers acknowledge that voluntary measures should be tried first, rather than mandating the vaccine for everyone out of the gate. However, if the target population doesn't comply within a trial period, a mandate should be rolled out, and the penalties for refusing to submit should be harsh. Given "the costs of a failed voluntary scheme," the writers warn, authorities should wait no more than a few weeks before rolling out a mandate if uptake falls short of expectations.
In a press conference Wednesday in Washington to address cases charged as part of the Telemedicine, Sober Homes, and Regional initiative, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and other enforcement agencies announcement marks "the largest amount of fraud ever charged by DOJ in a single national takedown operation," Rabbitt said.
Adding, "our efforts represent a continuation of the department's ongoing work to combat the devastating effects of health care fraud and opioid abuse around the country."
1. The Case
Mounting COVID-19 cases and deaths result from limitations on physicians using a safe, effective and low-cost treatment medicine. This, despite many studies and data from other countries showing that HCQ really works to lower death rates and keep affected people from needing hospitalizations and expensive care.
Missing from discussions of hydroxychloroquine use is explicit acknowledgment that Anthony Fauci has used his considerable power and influence to block use of the drug and prevent physicians from using their best judgment. The media have failed to connect two death-causing actions: 1. Some state governors forcing nursing homes to accept virus-infected elderly people; and 2. Government preventing wide and early use of HCQ.
Comment: See also:
- In control of response panel, Remdesivir maker Gilead is behind the war on Hydroxychloroquine, will make billions
- What is Gilead's role in the war on hydroxychloroquine?
- Hydroxychloroquine works in high-risk patients, and saying otherwise is dangerous
- 'Don't speak for me': Yale doctor battles CNN anchor over effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine
- Objective:Health - The Strange Push to Suppress Hydroxychloroquine
- The disturbing push to discredit HCQ
Bill and Melinda Gates ... [have] seen firsthand the impact of disinformation, as they've become targets of conspiracy theories amplified and spread via social media ... [Melinda] Gates ... said society may need to start holding social media companies to account for their role in helping such disinformation spread.It's ironic, to say the least, considering the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation funds and influences mainstream media companies, which in turn write whatever the Gates desire, be it truthful or not, without disclosing their conflict of interest.
Comment: See also:
- Objective:Health - The True Cost of the Covid Lockdown
- Objective:Health - Gov. Response Killed More Than Covid - Interview with Denis Rancourt
- Objective:Health - Deconstructing the Covid Narrative with Investigative Journalist Rosemary Frei
- Objective:Health - Mass Hypnotic Entrancement and Torture in the Covid Lockdown
- Objective:Health: Bill Gates, COVID-19 and More With Special Guest James Corbett from The Corbett Report
- Objective:Health - The Ultimate Insanity of the Covid Lockdown - Interview with Sott.net Editor Joe Quinn
- Objective:Health - Bill Gates: Philanthropist, World Savior, AntiChrist
Are they all legit? What is implied by what we're being told? And why do so many people either ignore or normalize the revelations? Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we look into many of these recent revelations.
And check us out on Brighteon and lbry.tv!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.
Running Time: 00:38:36
Download: MP3 — 35.4 MB
"More than one hundred doctors and medical workers from Maimonides Medical Centre, one of the leading US hospitals at the forefront of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020, expressed strong interest in Russia's Sputnik V vaccine at an online briefing, the first of its kind, with Russian scientists from the Gamaleya National Research Centre of Epidemiology and Microbiology", the sovereign wealth fund said in a press release.
Scientists from the Gamaleya Centre told the US audience about the development of the Russian vaccine and the progress of the ongoing post-registration trial.
Comment: See also:
- Moderna, Pfizer & AstraZeneca seek urgent approval for their shots, just what Sputnik V was attacked for - don't expect a backlash
- Sputnik V launched: Russia dispatches first batches of pioneering Covid-19 vaccine to all of its 85 regions
- Biden's speech: Use COVID to destroy everything, blame Trump; Luongo interview with Sputnik
- Half of Russians don't want to take world's first Covid-19 vaccine, only 42% willing to try 'Sputnik V'
- Sputnik V, world's first Covid-19 vaccine, launched - Putin's daughter among first to take it - Vaccine will NOT be mandatory in Russia
Comment: There is no scientific evidence for the efficacy of facemasks against airborne virus transmission, but there is scientific evidence for the dangers of wearing facemasks.