Health & Wellness
The Telecom Industry has been warning their investors about liability from their devices and transmitters for many years - but not the public. This still seems to be okay with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) (see 1, 2, 3, 4), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and many elected officials despite the peer-reviewed and published research confirming that exposure to all sources of Electromagnetic Radiation or "Electrosmog" is harmful.
Some research says that exposure increases cancer risk. Some says that it definitely causes cancer. Some says that it can cause all kinds of other undesirable, disabling, and sometimes fatal health conditions.
Despite this - it's more common to see adults and children carrying, holding, or wearing (see 1, 2) electronic and wireless devices directly against their bodies. The media as well as advertising campaigns depict these devices against bodies as normal too - even for kids. Unfortunately "common" or "normal" doesn't mean safe. Many doctors are not taking this into consideration when diagnosing and treating patients despite exposure warnings from the American Academy of Pediatrics and other health experts (see 1, 2).
Many people also aren't aware that there are instructions in the "fine print" of manuals not to carry, hold, or wear wireless devices against the body. They usually are NOT easy to find. That's why the City of Berkley, CA fought for an ordinance for simple printed warnings to be provided with the sale of cell phones. Seems reasonable, doesn't it?
All told, the U.S. government spends $20 billion annually on farm subsidies, with approximately 39 percent of all farms receiving some sort of subsidy. For comparison, the oil industry gets about $4.6 billion annually and annual housing subsidies total another $15 billion. A significant portion of this $20 billion goes not to your local family farm, but to Big Aggie.
(Note that this $20 billion annual farm subsidy figure doesn't take into account the 30+ years of ethanol subsidies to the corn industry nor export subsidies to U.S. farmers issued by the USDA.)
The government never properly explains why this is. Certainly small farmers are growing their crops at enormous risk. However, it's not clear that agriculture is any different than other high-risk industries - especially because the United States is blessed with some of the most fertile farmland in the world, and a highly skilled labor force.
Subsidies don't just cost taxpayers, an expense that might properly be justified by showing a return on investment. Subsidies also provide powerful disincentives against innovation, as well as cost effectiveness and diversification of land use.
Witnessing the current state of society and comparing it to even a decade ago, one can't help but notice a clear degenerative path, seemingly toward disintegration. Things that would seem deplorable in the past now seem to be becoming more and more acceptable, even normal.
Aborted fetuses sold off organ by organ like car parts, sick and twisted sexual fetishes being collectively celebrated, cannibalism suggested as a solution to climate change, girls as young a eleven legally allowed to go topless in Colorado - it seems there's no end to this collective slide into perversion and depravity.
Join us for this episode of Objective:Health, where we talk about degeneracy - humanity's increasingly low intellectual and moral state.
And check us out on Brighteon!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.
Running Time: 01:01:32
Download: MP3 — 55.6 MB
Writing in the health journal BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health, Dr. Emma Derbyshire says a plant-based diet lacks choline — a key nutrient for mental development. It is mainly found in beef, eggs, dairy, fish and chicken.
According to Derbyshire, studies suggest low levels in pregnancy can harm the fetus and raise the child's risk of memory and brainpower problems.

Federal health agencies continue to investigate why some people who vape are developing serious lung illnesses.
Forty-six states and one territory, the U.S. Virgin Islands, have been affected. Twelve people in 10 states — California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri and Oregon — have now died.
"This is something pulmonary critical care physicians are experiencing across the country right now," said Albert Rizzo, the chief medical officer of the American Lung Association, on September 24 during congressional testimony on the outbreak before the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Comment: The sudden increase in vaping-related illnesses is quite shocking. Could it be due to the mainstream coverage which is encouraging those affected to come forward? Or, is the data being fabricated for some nefarious purpose? Alternatively, it could be that a particularly toxic batch of vape liquid has recently been released and is wreaking havoc, although, without more information, it's hard to tell. Whatever the cause in the sudden spike of reports, it's probably wise to skip the vape and stick with the real stuff!
Also noteworthy:
E-cigarettes have been in wide use for years, while these cases have cropped up only recently. It therefore seems likely that the agents responsible for the symptoms are relatively new.And:
[...]
One possible culprit, identified in most samples of cannabis extracts tested by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and health officials in New York, is vitamin E acetate, an oil-based nutritional supplement that may be dangerous when inhaled. "Legally sold nicotine based e-cigs are not harmless," former FDA chief Scott Gottlieb said on Twitter last week.
That hype creates the demand for a political response, and the cycle culminates in the assumption of new state powers to curb the supposed threat. And though the danger is eventually exposed as chimerical, the new governmental intrusion into public lives is very real and persists long after the panic has dissipated.For more information on vaping see below:
[...]
If the threat posed by vaping is limited to adulterated and unlicensed marijuana products, as the available evidence seems to suggest, a rational response to the problem would be two-fold. First, curb the distribution of those products through tailored legislation and policing — not a blanket assault on the vaping industry. Second, reduce the incentives to engage in the black market by licensing and regulating safe products
- Objective:Health: #31 - The Vaping Crisis - They're Coming For Your Vapes!
- Nicotine is not the culprit: Vaping crisis ignores oil-based additives in cannabis products
- Teenager left in coma after vaping every day led to deadly disease
- Three people have now died from lung disease after vaping
- E-cig vapor disables key immune cells in the lung and increases inflammation
- Vaping damages DNA and may increase cancer risks, says study
- The smoking ban ten years later - What did it actually accomplish?

This photomicrograph depicts Cryptococcus neoformans using a light India ink staining preparation.
In the paper, to publish Oct. 1 in the journal mBio, the co-authors confront the mystery of the Cryptococcus gattii outbreak in the Pacific Northwest. The outbreak, involving at least several hundred known cases, has been ongoing since 1999, with cases still occurring in humans and wildlife. It has long puzzled epidemiologists because the fungal subtypes isolated from the vast majority of infected patients resemble subtypes normally seen in Brazil and nearby areas of South America.
Comment: There are a number of factors to consider here before any solid conclusion can be made, such as: the relatively recent explosion in infectious diseases worldwide, the adaptation or 'evolution' of organisms, natural disasters, nuclear testing and the changing climate:
- New Light on the Black Death: The Viral and Cosmic Connection
- Darwinism, Creationism... How About Neither?
- Man dies from flesh-eating bacteria he contracted on fishing boat
- 'Urgent threat': Mysterious, deadly fungus Candida auris sweeps the globe
- Scientists warn of suffocating oceans as huge dead zones quadruple since 1950
- Hypersexual zombie cicadas infected with psychoactive fungus discovered
And check out SOTT radio's:
- The Truth Perspective: Are Cells the Intelligent Designers? Why Creationists and Darwinists Are Both Wrong
- The Truth Perspective: Mind the Gaps: Locating the Intelligence in Evolution and Design
- Objective:Health #24 - Cootie Invasion - Strange Disease and Infection Outbreaks

The health effects of red meat consumption are detectable only in the largest groups, researchers concluded, and advice to individuals to cut back may not be justified by available data.
Public health officials for years have urged Americans to limit consumption of red meat and processed meats because of concerns that these foods are linked to heart disease, cancer and other ills.
But on Monday, in a remarkable turnabout, an international collaboration of researchers produced a series of analyses concluding that the advice, a bedrock of almost all dietary guidelines, is not backed by good scientific evidence.
Comment: See also:
- Time to stop the war on meat! Livestock production can be good for the environment
- The Arnold's new documentary says meat will kill you. Here's why it's wrong
- Propaganda: Eating meat could be banned like smoking, says top barrister, as he calls for new crime of 'ecocide'
- Destructive farming is the issue — not whether you eat meat or vegetables
- Study shows vegans and vegetarians may have higher risk of stroke than meat eaters
- Propaganda alert: UN climate change report wants humans to 'eat less meat' to 'save the earth'

This magnificent piece of beef is no longer mere dinner. Instead it has become a pawn in the gathering war on meat
Grass-fed, fully traceable and properly hung, it was a paean to not just fine flavour, but first- class farming practice too. Sensible, sustainable agriculture, where the welfare of the animal is every bit as important as its impact upon the environment.
Yet this magnificent piece of beef is no longer mere dinner. Instead it has become a pawn in the gathering war on meat: a hysterical, ill-informed, one-size-fits-all assault that demonises farmers, butchers and consumers alike. A weapon, if you like, of grass destruction.
Take the decision made by the University of Cambridge catering service to remove beef and lamb from its menus to cut food-related carbon emissions. The head of the service, Nick White, claimed this was because 'sustainability is extremely important to our students and staff' and scientists have claimed beef and lamb produce most farm greenhouse gasses.
Comment: Don't let vegetarian environmentalists shame you for eating meat. Science is on your side
- Why we should resist the vegan putsch
- Agenda pushing: Majority of EAT-Lancet authors (over 80%) favored vegan/vegetarian diets
- Grass-fed Beef — The Most Vegan Item In The Supermarket
- Lab grown meat could produce more 'damage' than the real thing, scientists warn
- Making the Case for Sustainable Meat
On this show we talk about a UK teen who ate nothing but processed food until he went deaf and blind! Also in the UK, students at a posh school are coming home hungry as the school enforces a vegetarian diet for all.
We also talk about an Armenian woman who cries solid crystals, Canadian teens swearing off having babies until the government 'does something' about climate change and the Swiss rally to prevent widespread implementation of 5G networks (God bless the Swiss!) and more.
Join us for a rousing discussion, and let us know what you think in the comments!
And check us out on Brighteon!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.
Running Time: 01:08:42
Download: MP3 — 62.4 MB
Sandoz, the makers of Zantac made the decision days after regulators in the U.S. and Europe found NDMA, a known carcinogen, in the medications.
Comment: Although the recall is being instituted for reasons of contamination, the drugs themselves are very harmful, both in side-effects and the way the drugs actually work. Artificially reducing stomach acid is based on a complete misunderstanding of the problem (reminiscent of using statins to artificially lower cholesterol levels). It would be nice if this recall lead to people getting off the drugs and addressing their digestive problems with natural means, but it's most likely most will simply switch brands.
See also:
- Proton Pump Inhibitors: So dangerous that prescriptions border on being criminal
- Heartburn drugs linked to fatal heart and kidney disease, stomach cancer
- Long term use of acid reflux drugs could double stomach cancer risks
- How to safely address acid reflux and avoid increased risk of mortality and morbidity
- Certain heartburn medications can increase your risk of dying sooner
- Acid suppression medications linked to serious gastrointestinal infections











Comment: Choline is just the beginning. The vegan diet, no matter how much it's supplemented, is woefully deficient in a number of micro and macro nutrients leading to degenerating health. Adults choosing to malnourish themselves is one thing - forcing it on children is criminal.
See also: