My
last post presented evidence for what I'll call the hot lot hypothesis (HLH):
the different rates of reported deaths among Covid vaccine batches are due to differences in toxicity, with the earlier batches being especially bad.But some commenters brought up a legitimate issue with the HLH, which I'll call the unhealthy vaccinee bias (UVB):
the earliest batches were given to the eldest of the elderly and the sickest of the sickly who die at higher rates regardless of what does or doesn't get injected into them. So hot lots might just be a statistical illusion that goes away once you control for pre-existing health factors, kind of like
Covid vaccine effectiveness.
But in Japan, the sick and elderly didn't get the jabs first; healthcare workers did. In fact, the high-risk elderly only started getting jabbed almost two months after low-risk healthcare workers (
February 17th vs
April 12th 2021). This is noteworthy not just because it reminds us that the jabs were primarily sold to the population as a way to 'stop the spread' but also because it means the earliest batches delivered to Japan went to working-age people, giving us a chance to test the hot lot hypothesis free from the unhealthy vaccinee bias.
And if we were to search for evidence of, say, higher cardiovascular deaths in working-age males, where better to look than the monthly statistics for deaths due to arrhythmia and heart failure rather than just deaths reported after the jabs? The below graphs come yet again from Nagoya University's Prof
Seiji Kojima.
Comment: Guilty conscience and self-preservation, those are the motives. He knew the detriments long ago.