Welcome to Sott.net
Sat, 23 Jan 2021
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness
Map

Syringe

Here's why you should skip the COVID vaccine

Mike Whitney
Unz Review
Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:06 UTC
Covid vaccine
© Chris Gash/New York Times
"The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are."

Peter Doshi, associate editor of the British Medical Journal and assistant professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
The new Covid vaccines will make billions of dollars for the big pharmaceutical companies, but here's what they won't do:
  1. The vaccines will not cure Covid
  2. The vaccines will not prevent people from contracting Covid
  3. The vaccines will not prevent Covid-related hospitalizations
  4. The vaccines will not prevent Covid-caused deaths
Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, "If the vaccine does not protect me from getting Covid (or dying from Covid), then why should I take it?"
      Read More...
Hearts

Activating the vagus nerve could lower your risk for Covid-19 and other inflammatory conditions

Mark Heid
elemental
Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:22 UTC
social distancing, Domino Park
© Paul Martinka
People social distancing at Domino Park in Williamsburg, Brooklyn.
Like other apes, humans are social animals. We evolved to live in codependent communities, and we do poorly if deprived of interpersonal contact.

Everyone has a different threshold for social interaction. But nearly all of us tend to become distressed when cut off from others, and our immune system responds to this distress by ramping up its defenses. A new study in the journal Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews finds that social isolation is associated with a rise in inflammation-promoting molecules, including some that are implicated in severe Covid-19. And past research has linked loneliness to poor cellular immune health and increased viral loads during an infection.

All of these cellular and immune changes are worrying in the context of SARS-CoV-2. Inflammation is a unifying feature of illness, and out-of-control inflammation seems to be a common feature of severe Covid-19.

Comment: Eiriu Eolas is an excellent breath and meditation program designed to stimulate healthful vagal nerve activity.. Find it free here.

      Read More...
Flashlight

Peer-reviewed hydroxychloroquine study finds 84% fewer hospitalizations among early treated outpatients

Chris Pandolfo
The Blaze
Tue, 24 Nov 2020 05:26 UTC
hydroxychloroquine
© GEORGE FREY/AFP via Getty Images
'What differentiates this study is that patients were diagnosed very early with COVID-19 in an outpatient setting, and only high-risk patients were treated early on'

A peer-reviewed study analyzing the effectiveness of a triple drug cocktail including hydroxychloroquine in treating COVID-19 patients found that the treatment was effective and that it significantly reduced hospitalization and mortality rates for those in the treatment group.

The study, authored by the controversial Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in partnership with two German doctors, was accepted for peer-review and will be published in the December issue of the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. An online-only version of the study was published Oct. 26.

Dr. Zelenko and team, Drs. Roland Derwand and Martin Scholz, sought to describe the outcomes of high-risk patients with laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 who received early treatment with zinc, low-dose hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin. A total of 141 diagnosed COVID-19 patients were prescribed the triple treatment over a five-day period. They were compared with a control group of 377 confirmed COVID-19 patients who did not receive the treatment.
      Read More...
Attention

A low-fat, high-carb diet has been the largest public health experiment in history. As the world gets ever fatter, we MUST rethink

Malcolm Kendrick
RT
Wed, 25 Nov 2020 18:07 UTC
overweight americans fat
© Getty Images / Zena Holloway
New research suggests that four billion people globally will be overweight in 2050. This trend can be traced back to the 'low-fat, high-carb' guidelines first issued in the 70s, and should prompt a major U-turn on dietary advice.

A recent report from the Potsdam Institute predicts that by 2050 there will be four billion overweight people in the world, with one-and-a-half billion of them obese. This is not entirely surprising. The world has been getting fatter for years, and things do not seem to be slowing down.

This Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) graph, which looks at the rise in overweight adults in a number of different countries, shows that the trend seems inexorably upward.

Comment:

      Read More...
Life Preserver

American with rare muscle atrophy walks again thanks to treatment in Russia - US doctors gave him no chance of recovery


RT
Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:54 UTC
Spencer
An American man with a rare muscle disorder took a chance on Russia after doctors back home gave him little hope of walking again. In the US, Alan Spencer's prognosis varied between being bedridden for life or wheelchair-bound.

Now, after a month of treatment, under the guidance of Russian specialists, he's able to walk on his own.

Spencer first felt something was wrong with his health around five years ago. Initially, it was his hands that lost their strength, then his condition began gradually worsening.

Comment: Russia is at the forefront of numerous scientific endeavours:

      Read More...
Health

Masks are neither effective nor safe: A summary of the science

Colleen Huber, NMD
Technocracy News
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 20:52 UTC
Woman wearing mask
© Adobe Stock
Print this article and hand it to frightened mask wearers who have believed the alarmist media, politicians and Technocrats in white coats. Masks are proven ineffective against coronavirus and potentially harmful to healthy people and those with pre-existing conditions.

My wife and I dined out last night in a very empty restaurant and the young waitress was required to wear a cloth mask. I asked her how she was doing with the mask and if there were any side effects. She related that was consistently short of breath (when away from the table, she lowered the mask below her nose) and that she had actually passed out because of it a few days earlier, taking her straight to the floor. Fortunately, she was not hurt. - TN Editor
At this writing, there is a recent surge in widespread use by the public of facemasks when in public places, including for extended periods of time, in the United States as well as in other countries. The public has been instructed by media and their governments that one's use of masks, even if not sick, may prevent others from being infected with SARS-CoV-2, the infectious agent of COVID-19.


Comment: See also:

      Read More...
Cow

Meat-free diets linked with greater risk of breaking bones - Oxford University study

Clare Wilson
New Scientists
Mon, 23 Nov 2020 12:00 UTC
vegetarian
© coldsnowstorm/Getty Images
A vegetarian diet may increase the risk of breaking bones
People who don't eat meat are more at risk of breaking bones, especially their hips, according to the largest study yet of this risk. The effect may stem from a lack of calcium and protein in their diet, as well as the fact that they tend to be thinner and so have less flesh to cushion a fall.

Several previous studies have shown that vegetarians have weaker bones than meat eaters, but it was unclear if this had any meaningful effect on their risk of fractures.

The new research took advantage of a long-running study called EPIC-Oxford, originally set up to look at whether diet influences the risk of cancer by following the health of about 65,000 people in the UK from 1993 onwards. The study recorded people's typical diet and tracked their health through hospital records.

Comment: There's a lot more to bone strength than just calcium consumption, but it's clear that a diet rich in healthy meat and animal fat is the best foundation: And check out SOTT radio's:

      Read More...
Life Preserver

4-year-old almost dies due to lung infection caused by prolonged mask wearing - doctor rants 'how many children must die?'

Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact News
Fri, 20 Nov 2020 06:00 UTC
Children wearing masks
© healthimpactnews.com
How long are parents going to continue masking their children causing great harm to them, even to the point of risking their lives?

Dr. Eric Nepute in St. Louis took time to record a video rant that he wants everyone to share, after the 4-year-old child of one of his patients almost died from a bacterial lung infection caused by prolonged mask use.

He states:
The system is set up to kill people right now.
      Read More...
People 2

Experts can't find a single child under 10 who passed on coronavirus to an adult raising hopes they pose no risk

Faith Ridler
Daily Mail
Wed, 29 Apr 2020 21:07 UTC
2 kids masks
© Shutterstock/L. Julia
No child is known to have passed on Covid-19 to an adult, a medical review has found, as evidence suggests youngsters 'do not play a significant role' in transmission.

A review of paediatric coronavirus evidence revealed 'the China/WHO joint commission could not recall episodes during contact tracing where transmission occurred from a child to an adult.' Researchers have also failed to uncover any cases of children under the age of 10 transmitting the virus, which has killed more than 26,000 people in the UK.

Studies into the impact of coronavirus on children also found it likely youngsters 'do not play a significant role' in transmission of the virus, although experts admitted the facts are still 'unclear'.

Professor Russell Viner, of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, told the Telegraph: 'From around the world we are not seeing evidence that children are involved in spreading or transmitting the virus, but we do not have enough evidence.'

The review of 'pertinent paediatric literature' regarding coronavirus, led by Dr Alasdair Munro and published in partnership with the RCPCH, found current evidence 'consistently demonstrates reduced infection and infectivity of children in the transmission chain.'
      Read More...
Chart Pie

Danish mask study finally published: No statistically significant difference between wearing or not wearing mask

Vinay Prasad
Medpage Today
Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:34 UTC
danish mask
I was drawn to science and medicine because of all human endeavors, ours is one where smart people can say, "I don't know." We don't stop there. We run a study or experiment that helps us know more. That is what makes what we do different than other human endeavors.

I start then with a humility as I take on the Danish Mask Study, published on Wednesday in the Annals of Internal Medicine. This is a 4,800-person randomized trial that took place in the spring and early summer in Denmark. The trial was run at a time where most Danes did not wear masks when they left their house. It told participants to practice social distancing and randomly assigned them with the advice to wear a mask (and even gave them 50 surgical masks), advising them to change it after every 8 hours of use, or gave them no advice to wear mask, and followed them to see how many acquired SARS-CoV-2 by PCR or antibody testing. The answer was a nearly identical proportion -- 42 of 2,393 people (1.8%) in the mask group and 53 of 2,470 (2.1%) in the no-mask group. The difference was not statistically significant.


Comment:


Before I tell you what the study showed and didn't, we have to consider some criticism that is rapidly emerging.

Was the trial underpowered? The trial was powered to test its hypothesis of a 50% reduction in SARS-CoV-2 from mask wearing in a setting where the baseline risk was approximately 2%. The trial anticipated a 20% loss to follow-up. By these measures the trial was adequately powered to test its hypothesis, but let's be honest, the authors could not possibly have known at the outset the exact rate of COVID-19. While 2% was a terrific guess, it so easily could have been 22%. SARS-CoV-2 is a fat-tail probability event: meaning that it is possible for extremely bad scenarios to occur. Instead of California, Denmark could have been South Dakota! For this reason, I don't judge them harshly for power.

Comment:



      Read More...
Amazon Smile
Revolt! T-shirts