Health & Wellness
The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared AMR as one of the top 10 global public health threats against humanity. It is estimated that by 2050, antibiotic-resistant infections could claim 10 million lives each year and impose a cumulative $100 trillion burden on the global economy. The list of bacteria that are becoming resistant to treatment with all available antibiotic options is growing and few new drugs are in the pipeline, creating a pressing need for new classes of antibiotics to prevent public health crises.
"We took a creative, double-pronged strategy to develop new molecules that can kill difficult-to-treat infections while enhancing the natural host immune response," said Farokh Dotiwala, M.B.B.S., Ph.D., assistant professor in the Vaccine & Immunotherapy Center and lead author of the effort to identify a new generation of antimicrobials named dual-acting immuno-antibiotics (DAIAs).

Post-mortem brain tissue reveals the memory function in female and male Alzheimer's mice differed after they were treated with a drug that selectively blocks a receptor to regulate memory and learning.
The paper, 'AB oligomers induce pathophysiological mGluR5 signaling in Alzheimer's disease model mice in a sex-selective manner,' published in Science Signaling Magazine highlights the mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease are fundamentally different between men and women in regards to one specific treatment.
The study was led by first author Dr. Khaled Abdelrahman alongside senior author Dr. Stephen Ferguson, both of the Faculty of Medicine's Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and the Brain and Mind Research Institute.
Comment: More proof that if the sciences continue to allow post-modern thought (such as 'gender-fluidity') into their field the opportunity for discoveries will be stunted and, ultimately, the consequences will be deadly:
- The genetics of side-effects
- How genetics is proving that race is not necessarily a social construct
- Post-nihilism, a template for where we are heading
- The gender identity concept came from a pedophile and human experimenter
The statement that the new strain of Covid-19 is 70 percent more contagious is nothing, but a claim made by politicians so far, Christian Drosten, the head of the virology department at the Berlin's Charite center — one of Europe's largest university hospitals — told the German radio broadcaster Deutschlandfunk.
He said:
"Suddenly, there is this figure out there, 70 percent, and no one even knows what is meant by that,"The virologist believes there is just not enough data to really say that the new strain is any more dangerous than the other existing ones.
Comment: More details about this "new strain" of Covid-19 in this RT article:
The World Health Organization has come forward to calm things down amid the anxiety over a new potentially 'highly infectious' Covid-19 strain found in the UK, saying it is not that different from other coronavirus strains.It is probably one of many identified mutations of the Covid-19 virus that typically have a 99.99% survival rate. This supposed "new and deadly strain" will be used to spread more fear and hysteria among people and justify another round of tyrannical lockdowns that are the main culprit for so many unnecessary deaths, especially among older people.
The WHO's Health Emergencies Program Chief Mike Ryan told at a press conference on Monday, citing data received from British scientists."There is zero evidence that the new coronavirus variant increases severity of the disease,"The risks faced by the people that catch this particular strain of the virus are pretty much the same as odds faced by other people suffering from Covid-19. According to the WHO, it is neither more aggressive, nor any deadlier than the other strains.
With the looming threat of mandatory vaccinations on the horizon, these documents become all the more vital and important for every citizen to be aware of their rights and what one can do in the face of medical tyrrany. On this episode of Objective:Health, we discuss the Nuremberg Code, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights and how these documents are more pertinent now than ever before.
YouTube sucks, so check us out on Brighteon and lbry.tv!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.
Running Time: 00:34:30
Download: MP3 — 31.6 MB

Fiddausi Abdullahi Madaki, a victim of Pfizer's 1996 test, sits at her home in Kano, Nigeria
Mr Etigwe had chosen Mr Altschuler because, back in 1979, the Connecticut lawyer had successfully defended a friend of the Nigerian. The unlikely pair were about to embark on a marathon journey into the world of "big pharma". Nine years on and their efforts have finally been rewarded with a reported $75m (£50m) settlement, the terms of which are likely to be released this week.
Critical care nurse Tiffany Dover at CHI Memorial Hospital in Chattanooga was having a lucid discussion with WRCBtv following her vaccination, when she became visibly impaired - holding her hand to her head and swaying. She then apologized to the news crew, turned away from the camera, and fainted.
"Ten minutes after the shot, Dover became light-headed and passed out while speaking with us," the outlet reported.
Comment: See also:
- Texas hospital botches vaccine PR stunt as nurse jabbed with EMPTY SYRINGE, but liberals say pointing it out is 'anti-vax'
- Pfizer to assess report about 'potential serious allergic reaction' to Covid-19 vaccine after Alaska health worker is hospitalized
- Objective:Health: - Death in Covid Vaccine Study - No Safety Concerns?
- India: World's largest vaccine maker sues trial volunteer for Covid-19 'immunization' - who alleged side effects and "lost the ability to do simple tasks"
- CNN: 'Don't be alarmed' if people start dying after taking the vaccine
- Four volunteers of Pfizer's experimental coronavirus vaccine developed Bell's palsy, regulator warns those with allergies to NOT take it
Experts are now coming forward in growing numbers denouncing mass PCR testing as foolhardy and nonsensical if not outright criminal. Why? Because we're now finding that PCR tests rarely tell us anything truly useful, at least not when they're used as they have been so far.
Yet, for some easily identified reasons, they must be feeling insecure, as this essay suggests, because they are aggressively attacking the opposition to their well laid out plans.
A Yahoo News article begins with, "The spread of very often absurd vaccine misinformation on social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter is not what the world needs as it prepares to inoculate itself for COVID-19." This is not a factual statement. The world is not preparing, not as they are implying. Millions are more afraid of the vaccine than the virus, which is not much of a threat when properly treated. However, politicians and health officials are foaming at the mouth for a rapid vaccine rollout.
Comment: See also:
- Texas hospital botches vaccine PR stunt as nurse jabbed with EMPTY SYRINGE, but liberals say pointing it out is 'anti-vax'
- Coronavirus vaccine: why it's important to know what's in the placebo
- Majority of Austrians REJECT Covid-19 vaccines and mass testing program
- Pfizer to assess report about 'potential serious allergic reaction' to Covid-19 vaccine after Alaska health worker is hospitalized
- In latest 'conspiracy' crackdown, Twitter to scrub posts claiming vaccines 'cause harm' or are 'used to control populations'
- Ireland considers coronavirus vaccine IDs, those without will suffer restrictions
- Pelosi warns lawmakers they'll be barred from speaking on House floor without a mask
- MSNBC's Dr. Gupta: 'Just because you get vaccinated doesn't mean you should be traveling or that you're liberated from masks'
A new meta-analysis study reveals that exposure to radiation from wireless devices such as cell phones, iPads and laptops significantly increases the risk of breast cancer.
The meta-analysis study (a statistical analysis that combines the results of multiple scientific studies) examined eight studies that were published between 1996-2015. The highest risk was found in women over 50.
Comment: See also:
- Russian government recommended banning Wi-Fi and cell phones in primary schools
- Dozens of parrots found dead on mobile phone mast in the Philippines
- Verizon warns shareholders AGAIN about personal injury and death lawsuits from wireless radiation health effects
- Woman who used laptop on lap gets tumor in leg - coincidence or toxic electromagnetic radiation?
- Class-action lawsuit claims Apple and Samsung phones exceed FCC radiation limits
- 'Radiation scandal': Class action lawsuit filed against Samsung, Galaxy, Apple iPhone
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?
The "gold standard" Sars-Cov-2 tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR works by taking nucleotides - tiny fragments of DNA or RNA - and replicating them until they become something large enough to identify. The replication is done in cycles, with each cycle doubling the amount of genetic material. The number of cycles it takes to produce something identifiable is known as the "cycle threshold" or "CT value". The higher the CT value, the less likely you are to be detecting anything significant.
This new WHO memo states that using a high CT value to test for the presence of Sars-Cov-2 will result in false-positive results.













Comment: See also:
- Some bacteria sacrifice themselves to protect their brethren from antibiotics
- Acidic environment could boost power of harmful pathogens
- Shapeshifting: Cause of antibiotic resistance identified
- Horizontal gene transfer: The surprising trick bacteria uses to render drugs useless
And check out SOTT radio's: The Truth Perspective: Are Cells the Intelligent Designers? Why Creationists and Darwinists Are Both Wrong