Health & Wellness
There was a time when Monsanto claimed their patented herbicide Roundup was "safer than table salt" and "practically nontoxic," and aggressively marketed this message until 1996, when they were ordered by Dennis C. Vacco, the Attorney General of New York, to pull the ads.[1]
Fast forward 15 years, after millions of farmers around the world bought into the false advertising and who, as a result, are now driving the production and use of several hundred million pounds of the chemical annually, Roundup herbicide is beginning to look eerily like Monsanto's Agent Orange 2.0.
Indeed, within the scientific community and educated public alike, there is a growing awareness that Roundup herbicide, and its primary ingredient glyphosate, is actually a broad spectrum biocide, in the etymological sense of the word: "bio" (life) and "cide" (kill) - that is, it broadly, without discrimination kills living things, not just plants. Moreover, it does not rapidly biodegrade as widely claimed, and exceedingly small amounts of this chemical - in concentration ranges found in recently sampled rain, air, groundwater, and human urine samples - have DNA-damaging and cancer cell proliferation stimulating effects.
The researchers say it acts as a safe house for good bacteria, which can be used to effectively reboot the gut following a bout of dysentery or cholera.
The conventional wisdom is that the small pouch protruding from the first part of the large intestine is redundant and many people have their appendix removed and appear none the worse for it.
Scientists from the Duke University Medical Centre in North Carolina say following a severe bout of cholera or dysentery, which can purge the gut of bacteria essential for digestion, the reserve good bacteria emerge from the appendix to take up the role.
Bogus 'Natural' Products
The Organic Consumers Association, North America's leading watchdog over organic and fair trade standards, has launched a new nationwide campaign. The Organic Retail and Consumer Alliance (ORCA) was created to combat the problem of the meaningless 'natural' product label. The term 'natural' is the single most commonly used greenwash tactic (the Sin of Vagueness). NaturalNews.com points out that the term 'natural' can mean just about anything; it has no nutritional meaning and isn't truly regulated by the FDA. A wide assortment of products, ranging from Skinnygirl Cocktails to Frito Lay's SunChips to Wesson Oil, have been guilty of this marketing ploy.
Beauty companies love terms like these because they suggest concrete benefits that don't have to be backed up by science. In fact, as long as they don't claim to change the body's structure or function, companies don't need FDA approval to market new products to the public and are not required to provide any research to prove their claims.
These days, one almost needs a degree in chemistry to understand some of the catch phrases on skin care products. Gone are the days when simple statements such as "oil free" would suffice.
Perhaps the most common phrase is clinical formula. But this has no real meaning. It does not necessarily indicate that the formula was produced in a medical clinic, as the manufacturers would have people believe. Clinically tested could very well indicate that the product was tested, but what was it tested for? What were the results? Essentially, this marketing claim is meaningless.

During infection, the sensory vagus nerve sends a signal to the brain to initiate “sickness behavior,” an involuntary response characterized by fatigue, fever, myalgia, depression, and other symptoms that are often observed in patients with CFS.
For years, CFS researchers have been looking in plasma and blood cells for a pathogenic agent that causes the myriad of symptoms experienced by patients with the condition. However, according to VanElzakker, they may have been looking in the wrong place (plasma) and need to search instead in the tissues of the peripheral and central nervous system. During infection, the sensory vagus nerve sends a signal to the brain to initiate "sickness behavior," an involuntary response characterized by fatigue, fever, myalgia, depression, and other symptoms that are often observed in patients with CFS. However, VanElzakker proposes that when sensory vagal ganglia or paraganglia are themselves infected with any virus or bacteria, these symptoms would be exaggerated. He notes that many of the symptoms of sickness behavior (such as fatigue, sleep changes, myalgia, cognitive impairment, depression and zinc depletion) are also mediated by proinflammatory cytokines and observed in CFS.
Comment: Antiviral drugs are extremely toxic and full of side effects. There is nothing like stimulating and healing your vagus nerve naturally. For more information see our Éiriú Eolas program. Furthermore, if you want to learn how to deal with problematic viruses, see On viral 'junk' DNA, a DNA-enhancing Ketogenic diet, and cometary kicks.

The researchers said statins could affect hormone regulation in the body, especially as the study found women on the drugs were significantly more likely to suffer cancers driven by the hormone oestrogen
Alarming findings raise new concerns over the long-term safety of a widely prescribed medicine in the UK.
Previous studies have suggested the cholesterol-lowering drugs, used by an estimated eight million men and women, can reduce the risk of certain cancers - including the breast form of the disease.
However, most research looked at patients who had only been on them for five years or less.
The latest findings identified invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) which starts in the ducts of the breast before spreading inwards. It accounts for around seven out of ten breast cancer cases.
The experts at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Centre in Seattle, US, also found the chances of getting invasive lobular carcinoma, which accounts for ten to 15 per cent of breast cancers, went up almost 2.5 times in some women on statins long-term.
Around 48,000 women in Britain are diagnosed with breast cancer each year, equal to around 130 a day. A woman has a one in nine chance of developing the disease at some point in her life.
The reasons why the anti-cholesterol pills might stimulate cancer growth are unclear.
The researchers said one explanation may be that statins affect hormone regulation in the body, especially as the study found women on the drugs were significantly more likely to suffer cancers driven by the hormone oestrogen.
Comment: The target of statin therapy - cholesterol - just happens to be vital to all membranes for their proper functioning and structure. We are making highly unstable and dysfunctional cell membranes with statin drugs and our restriction of animal fats, which then has a toll on our cell membrane's function. The past decade of research has exposed the importance of cholesterol rich membranes with fundamental implications for our brains, hormones and immune system.
Statins many potential side effects range from depression, confusion, memory problems, inability to concentrate, liver damage, increased risk of cancer, fatigue, impotence, kidney failure, rhabdomyolisis (destruction of muscle cells), shortness of breath, it hinders our bodies ability to fight microbes and so forth. Cholesterol levels that are below 150 mg/dL increase your risk for cancer, hormonal imbalances, depression, sexual dysfunction, memory loss, Parkinson's disease, stroke, suicide, and violent behavior.
For more information see:
- Statins may do more harm than good in stroke victims
- Why Taking Statins Might be Pointless - And Even Bad for You
- Why Women Should Stop Their Cholesterol Lowering Medication
- Statins Cause Serious Structural Muscle Damage
- Taking statins may increase cancer risk
- Higher Cholesterol Levels Associated with Lower Risk of Death from Cardiovascular Disease in Japan
- How millions are tricked into ingesting harmful statins
- Statins Given to Prevent Pneumonia in Elderly Actually Increase Pneumonia Risk by 61 Percent

Sunbathers relax on Brighton Pier: grocery stores are typically seeing sales of bottled water double as the hot spell continues.
The UK's biggest supermarket raised the price of its two-litre bottles of Everyday Value water and cola by 41% to 24p last week, putting it well ahead of rivals Asda, Sainsbury's and Morrisons.
"This is not a very smart move," said Neil Saunders, managing director of retail consultancy Conlumino. "I find it quite surprising that Tesco has moved its price when its competitors haven't. They will not only get angry customers, if they notice, but this makes Tesco less competitive when there is a price war on in grocery."
The price rise came amid fears of bottled water shortages, with sales in overdrive as the nation tries to cope with temperatures soaring above 30C in parts of the country.
The incident follows the Hendra death of a horse from the same property on the mid-north coast near Macksville on July 4.
NSW Chief Veterinary Officer Ian Roth said there have never been other species aside from humans and horses that had been affected by Hendra in the state.
''It's the first dog in NSW,'' Dr Roth said.
Scientists have found that older people who are deficient in the vital vitamin D are more likely to struggle with everyday tasks.
And the study found that as many as 90 per cent of older people are vitamin D deficient.
Now experts say that taking a simple pill could boost levels and help people keep mobile, active and independent.
Vitamin D is a hormone produced in the skin using energy from sunlight and is essential for good bone health.
Deficiency is a significant public health problem with diagnosed cases on the rise.
Alongside poor bone health, muscle fatigue is a common symptom in vitamin D deficient patients.
Scientists recommend getting out in the sun regularly as about 90 per cent of our vitamin D intake comes from sunlight.
While it is established that both arsenic and estrogen can cause cancer, the research raises concerns about the dangers of chemicals in combination, and the efficacy of regulations that are established by testing one chemical at a time. Kamaleshwar Singh, PhD, is an assistant professor at The Institute of Environmental and Human Health at Texas Tech. "The majority of cancers are caused by environmental influences," Dr. Singh remarked to Texas Tech Today,
"Only about 5 to 10 percent of cancers are due to genetic predisposition. Science has looked at these chemicals, such as arsenic, and tested them in a lab to find the amounts that may cause cancer. But that's just a single chemical in a single test. In the real world, we are getting exposed to many chemicals at once."











Comment: Read more about The Chemicals In Your Cosmetics:
The High Price of Beauty
New Study Finds Major Toxins in Many Cosmetics
The Ugly Side of Beauty, Some Cosmetics Can Be Toxic
Pretty Ugly: Cosmetics Ingredients Linked to Breast Cancer?
Heavy Metals Found in Many Cosmetics: Not Listed on Labels
The Danger of Toxic Consumer Products, Fragrances
Revealed... the 515 Chemicals Women Put on their Bodies Every Day
Consumer group analyzes beauty products containing endocrine disrupters