Health & WellnessS


Take 2

How the International Food Information Council trains junk food companies to hide the truth about GMOs

Image
Editor's note: This is an edited version of a presentation made on Sept. 10, 2013, by OCA political director Alexis Baden-Mayer, at the American Frozen Food Institute's (AFFI) Government Action Summit. Presenting opposite Baden-Mayer was David Schmidt, president and CEO of the International Food Information Council (IFIC). AFFI is a trade group that opposes mandatory GMO labels. AFFI's largest and most influential member is ConAgra, which contributed $1,176,700 to defeat Prop 37, California's 2012 ballot initiative to label GMOs. ConAgra hasn't yet donated to oppose I-522, the 2013 Washington ballot initiative to label GMOs. But the company is a member of the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), which has so far donated $2.2 million to the NO on 522 campaign. ConAgra's CEO, Gary Rodki, is the GMA's chairman.

Soylent Green, the 1973 science fiction film starring Charlton Heston, depicts a dystopian future where a population suffering from pollution, depleted resources, poverty, dying oceans, and climate change survives largely on processed food rations produced by the Soylent Corporation. Soylent Green is a green wafer advertised to contain "high-energy plankton."

The climax of the film occurs when one of the characters reveals the truth: The world's polluted oceans no longer produce the plankton from which Soylent Green is reputedly made. Soylent Green is made from human remains.

Snakes in Suits

Former FDA official: HFCS consumption 'destroying the youth of the U.S.

Image
The mass amounts of this unnatural sweetener currently in the American diet are responsible for “creating a new population (suffering from) obesity, hypertension, high triglycerides, liver toxicity and early death.”

When Dr. Dana Flavin was asked by Life Extension magazine several years ago to write an article about high fructose corn syrup, she approached the idea a bit skeptically. Corn syrup, after all, had been around for ages, so could HFCS be much different? "I thought, that's ridiculous," she said, recalling how even her mother had used corn syrup to make cake icings.

But what Dr. Flavin, a former Food and Drug Administration toxicologist and physician subsequently learned about the "danger" and "toxicity" associated with high fructose corn syrup "flabbergasted" her. "When I began to read about it, it was like removing the wool from my eyes," she told Food Identity Theft in a phone interview from Germany.

Flavin is no stranger to interpreting scientific literature. The founding director of The Foundation for Collaborative Medicine and Research, based in Connecticut, she is now headquartered in Germany researching the "basic molecular pathology" of diseases as well as the pharmacology of both natural and synthetic substances to treat and reverse ailments. Along with those obligations, she's an adviser to cancer institutes in Germany, where she is also a practicing physician, and currently collaborating with colleagues in Israel, the United States, Canada and England. Her conclusion on the numerous studies about HFCS are quite firm. For her there is no debate on how this ubiquitous sweetener is harming the health of people, especially the young.

"If we don't get this out of the American diet we are going to end up with a country of lazy, obese, sick young people...this is exactly where it is moving," she said, "this is a horrendous problem...its toxicity is overwhelming and it's completely destroying the youth of the U.S."

Ambulance

CDC's 'bacteria of nightmares': A monstrosity created by outdated theory and practice

Image
Globally, great fear has been generated by the CDC Director's recent description of a "Nightmare Bacteria" resistant to all medications, capable of killing 1 in every 2 people whose blood becomes infected with it. But isn't the primary problem that the drugs aren't working, and that natural medical solutions are needed now more than ever?

According to a recent CDC report titled, Lethal, Drug-resistant Bacteria Spreading in U.S. Healthcare Facilities, drug-resistant germs called carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriacea, or CRE, are on the rise and resistant to all, or nearly all of the antibiotics within the conventional drug armamentarium.

The CDC describe CRE bacteria as a "triple threat":
  • Resistance: CRE are resistant to all, or nearly all, the antibiotics we have - even our most powerful drugs of last-resort.
  • Death: CRE have high mortality rates - CRE germs kill 1 in 2 patients who get bloodstream infections from them.
  • Spread of disease: CRE easily transfer their antibiotic resistance to other bacteria. For example, carbapenem-resistant klebsiella can spread its drug-destroying weapons to a normal E. coli bacteria, which makes the E.coli resistant to antibiotics also. That could create a nightmare scenario since E. coli is the most common cause of urinary tract infections in healthy people.
Tom Fieden, MD, MPH, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, generated quite a bit of alarm by referring to CRE as "nightmare bacteria":
CRE are nightmare bacteria. Our strongest antibiotics don't work and patients are left with potentially untreatable infections. Doctors, nurses, hospital leaders, and public health, must work together now to implement CDC's "detect and protect" strategy and stop these infections from spreading. [emphasis added]
'Nightmare Bacteria' or Rude Intellectual Awakening?

Truly this is a lesson in humility for the conventional medical system, and if the situation really is a "nightmare" as the CDC's Director describes, it will probably result in waking quite a few folks up, who despite appearing to have been awake were actually slumbering -- at least in the intellectual sense.

Smoking

'Smoker's Paradox' seen in cardiac arrest data

Image
Smoking is associated with improved survival as well as good neurologic outcome in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest, a study found.
Among patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after a cardiac arrest, smokers had better outcomes than nonsmokers, a single-center study showed.

Half of smokers survived to hospital discharge with a good neurological outcome compared with only 28% of nonsmokers (P=0.003), according to Jeremy Pollock, MD, of Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and colleagues.

The difference remained significant after adjustment for numerous potential confounders, including comorbidities (OR 3.82, 95% CI 1.43-10.24), they reported online in Resuscitation.

"Despite the findings of our study, we do not want the public to take from this that they should go out and start smoking to protect them from a future cardiac arrest," Pollock said in an email to MedPage Today.

"We hope," he said, "this will spur on further thought and discussion in regards to the etiology of the smoker's paradox," a previously observed phenomenon in which smokers are more likely to have an acute coronary syndrome but are less likely to die from an acute myocardial infarction (MI).

Comment: Another possibility is that smoking is actually good for you!! For more information see:

Nicotine - The Zombie Antidote
Let's All Light Up!
Pestilence, the Great Plague and the Tobacco Cure
Nicotine can boost blood vessel growth
Scientists Identify Brain Regions Where Nicotine Improves Attention, Other Cognitive Skills

Best to look elsewhere for the cause of heart attack:

Traffic Jams Triple Risk of Heart Attack
Study Suggests Calcium Supplements Linked to Significantly Increased Heart Attack Risk
If you get a heart attack, insist on magnesium!
High cholesterol does not cause stroke (but carbohydrate does)


Pills

Is the 'cure' more dangerous than the illness?

One of the major problems associated with antidepressant drugs are the side effects.

Image
Psychiatric spin doctors work overtime in an attempt to play them down, but when one of the side effects is thoughts of suicide, you need to be really good to dress them up and convince members of the public to keep taking the pills.

A common psychiatric statement is the idea that the benefits of the drugs outweigh the risks, but it is hard to see how benefits could outweigh someone taking their own life. Furthermore, calling suicidal thoughts a "side effect" is not entirely correct; they are an "effect" of antidepressants.

Time after time, we read about individuals who have taken their own lives where, via media reports, the antidepressant link is in full view.

When film director Tony Scott jumped to his death off a bridge, the autopsy found he had taken antidepressants and sleeping pills.

Another case involved grandfather Brian Palmer. An inquest in Chichester last year concluded he took his own life following the prescription of antidepressants.

The psychiatric spin doctors or psychiatrists themselves try their utmost to exonerate the drugs in question, but there are now so many deaths linked to antidepressant usage it is difficult to miss the fact.

A report from the Office of National Statistics gave the number of deaths where antidepressants were mentioned on death certificates.

Comment: Yes, this "cure" is more dangerous than the illness: For a comprehensive and proved effective healing way on how to deal with depression, see Mass nervous breakdown: Millions of Americans on the brink as stress pandemic ravages society.


Syringe

Gardasil vaccine destroys ovaries of 16-yr. old girl, causes infertility

Image
Gardasil is the vaccine created by Merck & Co. to stop human papillomavirus (HPV) in young women and men. Unfortunately, to say the vaccine is controversial would be a gross understatement - even a lead developer of the vaccine points out its undeniable dangers and how even how the vaccine is of little use. One recent case study published in the British Medical Journal found that the Gardasil vaccine destroyed the ovaries in a young girl of 16 years, ruining any future hope of her having children.

Two ingredients in particular are suspected of wreaking havoc on the female reproductive system, potentially damaging the ovaries and reproductive organs in ways that could prevent the young vaccine-recipients from ever having children.

One of those ingredients, polysorbate-80, is an emulsifying preservative, according to Natural News, and is commonly used in processed foods. Injected into the body, however, it's been shown to accelerate sexual maturation in women and also to reduce the weight and function of the uterus and ovaries.

Comment: Gardasil is proving to be the most dangerous vaccine Big Pharma has ever come up with:


Donut

130 Pounds of sugar a year is way, way too much

Image
© Monty Rakusen/Getty ImagesWould you like one lump of sugar or 1,000?
Cutting back on soft drinks and packaged foods is an easy way to reduce fructose consumption.

Whether you are eager to get back into the groove after one last handful of gumdrops or embracing a more healthful lifestyle for the first time, reining in your sugar consumption is a great place to start - especially in light of a study just published in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Although the study was small (just 20 people, all young and of normal weight), it was the first to use MRI scans to investigate the human brain's response to fructose and glucose, two simple sugars that are used separately or combined as sweeteners for food and beverages.

Glucose, which is found in plants (it's a product of photosynthesis), is the main source of energy for cells. When your body's supply runs low, your brain activates the area that stimulates appetite. Once the glucose level rises, the brain hits the off switch. With fructose, though, the MRI scans revealed that the brain can't tell when enough is enough. The upshot? You still think you're hungry, and keep eating.

Comment: The 'toxic truth about sugar':

Is Sugar Toxic?
Addicted to Sugar?
A Spoon Full of Sugar.... Is Toxic?
146 reasons why sugar destroys your health
The Links Between Sugar and Mental Health
Remember the Dangers of Refined Sugar
Cancer & Sugar - Strategy for selective starvation of cancer
Sugar Should Be Regulated As Toxin, Researchers Say
Sugar, Sugar - A Poison By Any Other Name Would Be As Toxic
Sweet Sabotage: The Harsh Reality of Sugar, Sugar Substitutes and "Natural Sweeteners"


Cult

Nazism, psychiatry and history repeating

Psychiatry
© Unknown

The Nazi era is not only the most devastating example of the complete suppression of human rights, it was quite intimately tied to psychiatry. In actual fact, psychiatry was the most powerful and driving influence behind Nazism.

It is commonly believed that Hitler ordered the mass execution, including cruel human experimentation, of Jews, gypsies and homosexuals during World War ll. Although just as responsible, he did not order that dark turning point in history, he simply signed his consent.

It was actually psychiatrists who initiated and carried it all out on such a massive scale. Nazis were the first in history to use extermination camps and all done with such chilling organization.

Attention

The devastating effects of digesting gluten: Digestive disorder reaches record levels in Scots children

More children than ever before are living with a debilitating digestive disease, research has shown.

Scientists have found that coeliac disease affects six times more children living in Scotland now than it did in 1990.

A team from the University of Edinburgh and Queen Margaret University analysed the health records of children from South East Scotland aged under 16 years who were newly diagnosed with the condition between 1990 and 2009.

The team - based at Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Edinburgh - found that the rate of children being newly diagnosed with Coeliac disease rose from 1.7 in every 100,000 children in 1990-1994 to 11.8 per 100,000 children in 2005-2009.

Coeliac disease only affects those who carry the gene for the condition. It is triggered by what doctors call an 'infective hit' - often a viral infection such as gastroenteritis - causing the immune system to attack the lining of the intestines.

Such damage can cause symptoms such as weight loss, abdominal pain and stunted growth, although doctors say that in many older children and adults, recurrent abdominal pain may be the only symptom.

Comment: The problem is, that "more than 55 diseases have been linked to gluten, the protein found in wheat, rye, and barley. It's estimated that 99% of the people who have either gluten intolerance or celiac disease are never diagnosed." Therefore, it's quite possible that much more people, if not most of our civilization are sensitive to this poison.

Read the following articles to learn more:

Gluten Then and Now
Gluten - The Hidden Killer
Do You Have Gluten Whiplash?
Gluten Causes Nerve Damage
Is gluten from grains making you sick?
Gluten: What You Don't Know Might Kill You
Gluten Sensitivity and Vertigo/Meniere's Disease
Science Finally Confirms Gluten Sensitivity
How Gluten Damages the Brain With Dr. Parker
Wheat gluten newly confirmed to promote weight gain
Six signs you're gluten intolerant - and don't even know it
Sensitivity To Gluten May Result In Neurological Dysfunction; Independent Of Symptoms
The Hidden Link Between Gluten Intolerance and PMS, Infertility and Miscarriage


Heart - Black

Science confirms the obvious: Pharmaceutical ads are misleading

Pharmaceuticals
© LadyofProcrastination via Wikimedia CommonsPharmaceuticals.
The U.S. is one of only two countries in the world* that allows pharmaceutical companies to market their products directly to consumers--in commercials like those cute little Zoloft ads and all those coy Viagra spots. Somewhat unsurprisingly, a new study finds that when over-the-counter and prescription drug companies make commercials trying to sell the public on their product, they're not always the most truthful.

As many as six out of 10 pharmaceutical advertisements contain "potentially misleading claims," according to a study from the Journal of General Internal Medicine.

The 168 advertisements studied came from a TV archive of ABS, CBS, NBC and CNN broadcasts that aired between 2008 and 2010. The researchers looked at the 6:30 news slot because that's a prime time frame to run drug ads--that's when old people are watching, and old people love their drugs.

Completely false claims about the drugs were pretty rare, probably because false advertising is illegal. But 57 percent of all the commercials left out vital information, or exaggerated something, inserted opinions rather than facts, or made meaningless "lifestyle associations," saying things like "taking x will help you live the life you want to." (Drawing implicit connections between taking Viagra and being a successful sailor might fit that bill).