Health & Wellness
Those of us suspicious of the novel vaccines have suggested that an interaction between the infection and the vaccine may be responsible, such as an auto-immune attack primed by the action of the vaccine in triggering sustained production of spike protein in numerous organs in the body including the heart, circulatory system and brain.

Small area of myocarditis/pericarditis. The pink area is the myocardium, and the white area is the epicardial fat. The purple cells are the lymphocytic inflammation.
The vaccinated people did not show obvious signs of heart damage. But when researchers ran blood tests three days after the jabs, they found high levels of troponin, a protein the heart releases when it is injured, in many recipients.
"Subclinical mRNA vaccine-associated myocardial injury is much more common than estimated based on passive surveillance," the researchers concluded. The paper was published last week in the peer-reviewed European Journal of Heart Failure.
Over 1 billion people have received mRNA jabs. The study suggests tens of millions of them may have suffered heart damage - and don't even know they've been hurt.

A deer tick, or blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis. Scientists have discovered a new bacteria species causing Lyme disease in the U.S. Midwest.
These figures mark a steep increase in cases since alpha-gal syndrome was first reported among a handful of Virginians in 2008 after being bitten by ticks.
Many cases are also likely going undiagnosed, the CDC now says, citing "concerning" knowledge gaps found in a separate study among American doctors surveyed about the red meat allergy.
Comment: As if that wasn't enough to worry about, there is also tick-borne Lyme disease:
- Half of all U.S. counties found to have Lyme disease-carrying ticks
- Lyme Disease - Why Lyme is the Mystery Disease
- Are Ticks Being Genetically Engineered To Make People Allergic To Meat?
- Biowarfare, Nazi scientists and the creation of Lyme Disease in the US
- Top Duke Oncologist Dr. Neil Spector: 'Lyme is the infectious disease equivalent of cancer'
The study analyzed data from 162 children and 80 mothers, parsing data on mercury levels in umbilical cords and hair, as well as from surveys on fish consumption and mental health. Researchers concluded that three generations of mercury exposure are linked to today's youth attempted suicide rates.
Donna Mergler, professor emerita at the University of Quebec in Montreal and lead author of the study, said she and her co-authors found that women from Grassy Narrows who ate a lot of fish during pregnancy were more likely to have children with both emotional and behavioral problems.
Comment: See also:
- Scientists sound grave warning about unprecedented mercury accumulation in deep Pacific Ocean trenches
- New study shows significant link between mercury and autism
- Exposure to flame retardants is causing US kids to lose millions of IQ points. They're more damaging than lead or mercury
- Treating mercury toxicity with emeramide
- The little known effects of mercury on the cardiovascular system
- The fallacy of "safe" levels of mercury & lead
Now, we don't need to get into the personal liberty implications of such a law, or the near-infinite supply of evidence that masks don't work to prevent the transmission of respiratory disease.
They don't work, they never worked. Mandating them was a political move designed to make the fake Covid "pandemic" appear real, and their continued use is a symptom of brainwashing or a by-product of chronic virtue signaling.
The mask debate, such as it was, is over.
No, the only aspect of this development worth talking about is the "evidence" used to support the position - and trust me, the quotes are entirely justified.
The "study" which claims to demonstrate the benefits of permanent masking was published in the Medical Journal of Australia last week and titled "Consistent mask use and SARS‐CoV‐2 epidemiology: a simulation modelling study".
"Simulation modelling study" is very much the key phrase there. For those who don't know, "simulation modelling studies" involve feeding data into a computer programme, then asking it to form conclusions.
Clearly, they are only as reliable and useful as the data you use. In fact, you can very easily make them produce any result you want by feeding in the "right" (bad) data.
In this particular modelling study they started out by telling the computer that cloth masks reduce transmission by 53% and respirators reduced it by 80%:
Odds ratios for the relative risk of infection for people exposed to an infected person (wearing a mask v not wearing a mask) were set at 0.47 for cloth and surgical masks and 0.20 for respiratorsEssentially, they told their computer that masks prevent disease...and then said "ok, computer, since you now know masks prevent disease - what would happen if everybody wore them all the time?"
The computer then told them - obviously - that nobody would get sick.
Because they made it logically impossible for it to say anything else.
But there's a bit more to it.
Many, many people disagree with me on this point, more than ever before. While I'm generally happy to let ideas I think are wrong persist alongside my own point of view, this is an exception, because it touches on the phenomenon of viral interference, which is very real and very important.
Properly understood, viral interference calls into question the entire rationale for non-pharmaceutical interventions to slow the transmission of viruses and suggests that mass vaccination against old endemic pathogens like influenza is a very bad idea - even in a fantasy world where those vaccines are absolutely safe, and especially if they're in any way effective.
Comment: See also:
- Flu away: Scientists baffled at disappearance of influenza...but is it really gone or just masked by Covid-19?
- Use of fear to control behavior in Covid crisis was 'totalitarian', admit scientists
- Shocking discovery! Scientists learn the flaming obvious: People are recovering from COVID-19 'like they would from the flu'
- Do avian influenza lockdowns make any more sense than covid ones?
- When COVID-19 deaths go up, other deaths go down
- Influenza Vaccine Sends Children Into Convulsions
COVID-19 saw the emergence of an industry of fact-checking websites and censorship of alleged misinformation, portrayed as a danger to public health and safety. Official sources were almost as focused on refuting competing ideas as on providing supposedly useful and accurate information. A good example of this was a guide against 'coronavirus fake news' issued by Castle Point MP Rebecca Harris in autumn 2020, probably following the publication of the Great Barrington Declaration by three eminent scientists challenging lockdown orthodoxy. It is well worth retrospective review: was officialdom right?
The research, led by Professor Bob Hancox, of the Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, and published this week in the journal Pediatrics, found that children who watched more television were more likely to develop metabolic syndrome as an adult.
Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions including high blood pressure, high blood sugar, excess body fat, and abnormal cholesterol levels that lead to an increased risk of heart disease, diabetes and stroke.
The city's health department reported Thursday that there was a 128 percent increase in cases of the illness among women in the area and "a nine-fold rise in congenital syphilis in Houston and Harris County."
Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection (STI) that could have serious complications if an individual leaves it untreated, per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Comment: See also:
- US reports 'out of control' STD situation, highest syphilis cases in 4 decades
- Europe faces 'looming syphilis epidemic' thanks to dating apps and reduced fear of HIV
- Facts you need to know about syphilis
- Health authorities sound alert over soaring rates of Syphilis in London
- Why syphilis has come roaring back
I present a striking example, pertaining to a study from Israel. Trying to be methodical, my article is somewhat on the long side, but the implications at the end are radical and broad.
Goldin et al. estimated the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine on several Covid-related outcomes, including death, in residents of long-term care facilities in Israel (mean age of 83 years). The large cohort (over 43,000) was heavily skewed towards vaccinated residents (90%). Only about 4,000 residents were not vaccinated.
Using a statistical method called survival analysis, the authors reported two age-adjusted values of vaccine effectiveness (VE) against Covid-related death:
Skipping ten days after the first dose, VE was 72%.Goldin et al. also analyzed all-cause death as an endpoint, which many researchers have omitted. Most important, two of their figures (below) show the cumulative number of Covid deaths and all deaths at several time points — from which we can compute the cumulative number of non-Covid deaths. The latter data has been consistently hidden in studies of vaccine effectiveness.
Skipping about seven days after the second dose, VE was 85%.
Comment: Correct interpretation is the key. This is one example coming to light.
Comment: Want to compromise brain activity? Just add SARS-CoV-2 spike!