Health & Wellness
The study, led by a team of researchers from the University of Cambridge, centered around telomeres, otherwise known as the ends of chromosomes. In short, telomeres play a similar role to the plastic that binds the ends of shoelaces, preventing chromosomes from fraying. As humans get older, telomeres become shorter and shorter, meaning their length can be used as a proxy to measure aging.
The researchers measured the length of telomeres in blood vessels of laboratory rats born from mothers who were not fed antioxidants during a normal or complicated pregnancy. In some of the rats, they simulated one of the most common complications in pregnancy - a reduction in the amount of oxygen a baby receives - by placing a group of pregnant rats in a room containing seven percent less oxygen than normal.
If you choose to reject any part of the current vaccine paradigm, as crafted by the government and the pharmaceutical industry, you will be put on to stupid list, even though, ironically, it is widely acknowledged that people who choose to chart their own way on the issue of vaccines tend to be extremely well-educated and often have advanced degrees.1 2 3 4 5
Comment: Author Marco Cáceres wrote another good article about what happens when anyone chooses to reject any part of the current vaccine paradigm: Internet trolls: Anyone resisting the vaccine party line is a target
Increasingly, professionals within a wide range of health care and science fields are giving interviews and writing articles and books voicing their concerns about vaccine risks, the misrepresentation of the historical role of vaccines in reducing mortality from infectious diseases, the expanding schedule and number of vaccines mandated, or even the basic mechanism theories behind vaccine science.
Predictably, every time you give the name of a contrarian doctor or scientist in response to the 99.9% figure, what you tend to get is, "Eh, well, he's a quack, she's not credible." Also, you get referred to blogs such as Science-Based Medicine,1 or Respectful Insolence2, or the Skeptical Raptor's Blog3. They're often written by or associated with a guy named David Gorski, MD, who also goes by the alias "Orac." Gorski is a surgical oncologist and an assistant professor of surgery at Wayne State University School of Medicine in Detroit, MI4.
Should you wish to debunk someone, anyone, who dares to disagree with mainstream thinking on vaccines, all you need do is inform Orac, and the good doctor will gladly oblige by writing up a boorish piece, long on insult and short on science. Orac's methods are painfully predictable.
For-profit corporate influences on for-profit medicine and for-profit "blue ribbon panels" explains much of what is regarded as the very profitable "standard of care" in medicine today. It also explains the prescribing habits and politics of many of us physicians.
Indeed, there has been a crisis of confidence among a small minority (as usual, a minority) of conscientious physicians, citizens, voters and employees of those institutions. Some of the folks that have become aware of what is happening may eventually rise up to blow a whistle on the creeping corporate domination of what is left of free, democratic America.
One only has to consider the corporate intrigue that has allowed the emergence of the anti-democratic, pro-corporate agendas of NAFTA, ALEC, Citizens' United, the PATRIOT Act, the Homeland Security Act, the Trans-Pacific Partnership, PNAC, the National Defense Authorization Acts, the endless war agendas, etc, etc.
Comment:
- 25 facts about vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry coverup
- Attorney demolishes Pro-Vaccine talking points: Suggests suing U.S. Federal Government & Big Pharma
- Big Pharma and organized crime — They are more similar than you may think
- The medical cartel: too big to fail, too evil to expose
There are people out there who get it -- people who make the connection and those are the people we will be talking to today... and want to hear from you, too!
Have you made changes to your diet that have had results? Want to share your story? Call in today, or share with us in the chat room during the broadcast at 10 am EST, 4 pm CET, as we hear testimonials about the benefits of the Paleo-Keto Diet!
With us, as always, will be resident animal health expert Zoya with her weekly Pet Health segment.
Running Time: 01:55:00
Download: MP3
"Rather than blocking consumers' access to information they want, the US Senate should move forward with a solution that works for business and consumers alike," said Senator Jeff Merkley (D, Oregon) the lead sponsor of the bill which was introduced on Wednesday.
Comment: If the food industry doesn't want to label their products as GMO and make it glaringly obvious then those companies that refuse to use GMOs in their food could easily label their products as "Non-GMO" and make that labeling glaringly obvious. No legislation required for that tactic!
In a new review of the evidence, a team of experts from Columbia University found there were "two distinct bodies of scholarship" on the matter - those who believe reducing salt intake will improve the overall health of the population, and those who don't.
Watching your salt intake has become one of the core pieces of dietary advice in the UK in recent years, and in the US it has got to the point where New York is requiring by law that restaurants label salt content in their food.
So it will be a surprise to many to find that just 54 per cent of the 269 academic reports included in the review found in favour of a salt reduction hypothesis.
Comment: See also:
- Why real salt is so important
- Shaking Up The Salt Myth: Healthy Salt Recommendations
- You need more salt: Advice to the contrary is criminal
- Avoid Table Salt: Learn Why You Should Switch to Unrefined Sea Salt
- The Truth About Salt: New Research Says Increasing Salt Decreases Heart Attacks
- Salt restriction increases heart disease deaths and hospitalizations
- High salt consumption not dangerous, new European study finds, but U.S. experts disagree
Slipped into already-contentious reform measures of the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act by the House of Representatives, the provision concerns now-banned polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), which, in the United States, were manufactured nearly exclusively by Monsanto. Though the Environmental Protection Agency banned the substances in the 1979, from the early 1930s through 1977, the agrichemical goliath produced around 1.25 billion pounds — of which an estimated 10 percent continues to wreak havoc on human health and the environment.
Comment: Monsanto is a completely evil and corrupt corporation! The reworking of the outdated Toxic Substances Act in Monsanto's favor is just another aspect of a much bigger pattern of corruption and collusion between Monsanto and the U.S. government. It is refreshing news that the following cities are currently in litigation over the cost to clean up PCB contamination! Hopefully the attorneys fear that 'the clause's potential to nullify legal efforts to hold Monsanto accountable' will not come to pass:
- Berkeley, CA joins list of cities suing Monsanto for poisoning San Francisco Bay
- San Diego sues Monsanto for polluting the bay with banned carcinogenic chemicals
- Monsanto being sued for knowingly contaminating Spokane River in Washington with PCBs
- Municipalities in the U.S. are fed-up with Monsanto's corrupt tactics, Oakland sues for environmental cleanup
—Let's screen everybody to find out if they have mental disorders. Let's diagnose as many people as possible with mental disorders and give them toxic drugs—
Wherever you see organized psychiatry operating, you see it trying to expand its domain and its dominance. The Hippocratic Oath to do no harm? Are you kidding?
The first question to ask is: do these mental disorders have any scientific basis? There are now roughly 300 of them. They multiply like fruit flies.
An open secret has been bleeding out into public consciousness for the past ten years.
THERE ARE NO DEFINITIVE LABORATORY TESTS FOR ANY SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDER.
One of the most troubling pieces of evidence presented to the court was an internal memo from a Johnson & Johnson medical consultant which stated, "anybody who denies [the] risks" between "hygienic" talc use and ovarian cancer would be publicly perceived in the same light as those who denied a link between smoking cigarettes and cancer: "Denying the obvious in the face of all evidence to the contrary."
Comment: Dangerous Beauty: Hazardous Beauty Products
- Hidden Chemicals in Perfume and Cologne
- Toxic Cosmetic Ingredients
- The Danger of Toxic Consumer Products, Fragrances
- The Top 10 Toxic Products You Don't Need
- The Dangers of Triclosan: A Common Anti-Bacterial Ingredient
- Pretty Ugly: Cosmetics Ingredients Linked to Breast Cancer?
- US Baby Cosmetics contain Cancer-Causing Chemicals
- There's Lead in Your Lipstick - And the FDA Won't Do a Thing About It
- Everyday Products Are Filled With Toxins - And We're Not Doing a Thing About It
- Deadly and Dangerous Shampoos, Toothpastes, and Detergents: Could 16,000 Studies Be Wrong?
When considering the cause of national apathy, Americans are evidently physiologically and socially similar to the junk food addled laboratory rat. Both tolerate repressive environments while confined against their will in a maze. In the natural desire to escape and find freedom, like the affected rat, Americans passively accept their confinement, acquiescing without struggle to a life of controlled stimulation and manipulation by all manner of drugs, tests, and mandated choice of direction. In a country objectively descending into chaos, why don't Americans care? In recent studies at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), these same rats evidence one reason for America's irrational disinterest in self-preservation.















Comment: See also:
Ketogenic Diet improves insulin sensitivity and numerous aging markers
Study demonstrates anti-aging effects of dietary supplement alpha lipoic acid
Study: Brain's ability to control metabolism and aging negatively impacted by sub-optimal stores of fat