Health & Wellness
The study, conducted by Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, looked at some 89 eligible volunteers over the age of 18 who had tested positive for coronavirus, and were living in state-run Covid-19 hotels. After being divided into two groups, 50% received ivermectin, and 50% received a placebo. Each patient was given the drug for three days in a row, an hour before eating.
83% of participants were symptomatic at recruitment. 13.5% of patients had comorbidities of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, hypertension or cancer. The median age of the patients was 35, ranging from 20 to 71-years-old.
Results
Treatment was discontinued on the third day, and patients were monitored every two days thereafter. By day six, 72% of those treated with ivermectin tested negative for the virus, vs. 50% of those who received the placebo. Meanwhile, just 13% of ivermectin patients were able to infect others after six days compared to 50% of the placebo group - nearly four times as many.
Hospitalizations
Three patients in the placebo group were admitted to hospitals for respiratory symptoms, while one ivermectin patient was hospitalized for shortness of breath the day the study began - only to be discharged a day later and "sent back to the hotel in good condition," according to the study.
"Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity," said Schwartz, adding "It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact."
The study, which appeared on the MedRxiv preprint server and has not yet been peer-reviewed. That said, Schwartz pointed out that similar studies - 'though not all of them conducted to the same double-blind and placebo standards as his' - also showed favorable results for the drug.
British study shows children UNLIKELY to contract severe Covid but UK wants to vaccinate them anyway

Year six pupils arrive at St John's Primary School in Fulham, West London, Britain, June 2, 2020.
The research, conducted by King's College London scientists, revealed that children aged between 5 and 17 who test positive for coronavirus typically recover in less than a week.
Headaches and tiredness were the most common symptoms observed, according to their paper, which was published on Tuesday in the Lancet.
Using data provided by parents to a non-profit group that supports Covid research, the study examined medical information collected from 1,734 minors who developed symptoms and tested positive for the virus between September 2020 and February 2021.
Comment: It was only last month that the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) stated: "The health benefits in this population are small, and the benefits to the wider population are highly uncertain. At this time, JCVI is of the view that the health benefits of universal vaccination in children and young people below the age of 18 years do not outweigh the potential risks".
Just two weeks later they have made a complete U-turn and advised that healthy 16 to 17-year-olds should be offered the first dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, just in time for No. 10's scientists to reveal that children as young as 12 would be offered jabs later this year. Most concerning is that children may not need parental consent to get the jab.
- Objective:Health - Kids and Covid Shots
- WHO: 'Children should not be vaccinated for the moment'
- The flimsy evidence behind the CDC's push to vaccinate children
- Pfizer lowers COVID-19 vaccine doses for younger kids in clinical trial
- UK children aged 12+ will be given Covid vaccines - report
- Busting the myth that vaccination prevents transmission
- Leave our kids alone
I am filled with joy and gratitude every time I travel and lecture as invariably many people tell me how I've changed their lives by providing vital information they couldn't find anywhere else and even better that was completely free.
Comment: Mercola and his team have been the target of vicious attacks and defamation for several years. However, since the onset of the COVID "pandemic", they have become victims of a targeted disinformation campaign aimed at destroying their reputation, censoring their online presence and silencing them.
See also:
- Media continue fake news campaign against Mercola
- Lies exposed: Center for Science in the Public Interest's (CSPI) organized attack against Mercola
- Shocking proof how Google censors health news
- Google attacks alternative health information by burying Mercola in their latest search engine update - Part 2: Wicked Wikipedia
- The web of elite extremists behind censorship of Mercola
Outside of this one day, there have been numerous additional protests popping up allover the world. Could this finally be the people power we've been waiting for, or is it only going to cement the resolve of the powers that be and lead to even more overt clampdowns on human rights?
Tune in to this episode of Objective:Health as we talk about protests around the world - the People have spoken!
And check us out on Brighteon!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f
And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:
♥https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16H-nK-N0ANdsA5JFTT12_HU5nUYRVS9YcQh331dG2MI/edit?usp=sharing
Running Time: 00:33:58
Download: MP3 — 31.1 MB
I have a confession to make. For at least the last ten years, I've taken an omega-3 supplement every day. Religiously. Why? I literally have no idea. I don't remember exactly when or why I started taking it. Presumably I read somewhere that it was a good idea. This was before I started studying medicine, and the decision certainly wasn't based on any thorough evaluation of the scientific evidence. So I figure it's probably about time I actually take a look at the evidence, before I decide whether to continue spending hundreds of dollars a year on omega-3 supplements.
The most commonly claimed benefit when it comes to omega-3 is that it prevents heart disease. This dates back to the 1970's, when it was noted that Inuit following a traditional diet rich in meat from whales and seals suffered from remarkably little cardiovascular disease. It was suggested that this might be due to the high levels of omega-3 fatty acids in meat from marine mammals. Of course, correlation is not causation, and I can think of several other major differences between the traditional inuit diet and the standard western diet that could explain the lack of heart disease, such as the complete absence of sugar.
Since then, there have been many randomized trials looking specifically at omega-3 for the prevention of heart disease. In 2018 the Cochrane collaboration carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis, with the goal of answering the question definitively. The review included both randomized controlled trials of omega-3 supplementation and of advice to eat more fatty fish. The requirements for inclusion in the systematic review were that the trials follow participants for at least one year, and provide data on mortality or outcomes related to heart disease.
As anticipated, President Biden on Thursday announced all civilian federal employees and contractors will be required to show proof of vaccination against COVID, or submit to regular COVID testing, wear masks and socially distance.

FILE - This 2016 photo made available by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows a strain of Candida auris cultured in a petri dish at a CDC laboratory. On Thursday, July 22, 2021, the CDC said they now have evidence of the untreatable fungus spreading in a Washington, D.C, nursing home and at two Dallas-area hospitals.
The "superbug" outbreaks were reported in a Washington, D.C, nursing home and at two Dallas-area hospitals, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported. A handful of the patients had invasive fungal infections that were impervious to all three major classes of medications.
"This is really the first time we've started seeing clustering of resistance" in which patients seemed to be getting the infections from each other, said the CDC's Dr. Meghan Lyman.
Comment: See also:
- Lockdowns blocked flu spread, what happens when it returns?
- Children in New Zealand falling ill after harsh lockdowns weaken immune systems
- Black fungus disease detected in South America
- Legionnaires' disease outbreak in New Jersey's prisons kept quiet by state officials
- Eight people test positive for Ebola in Guinea, first resurgence in the country since world's worst outbreak
Since that report was published, other whistleblowers in Germany who work in nursing homes have also stepped forward, some with video footage showing residents being held down and vaccinated against their wishes.
Comment: Not only have nursing home residents being forcibly injected with experimental vaccines without their informed consent, they have also been perhaps the greatest victims of lockdown measures, which resulted in a lack of access to basic medical care, forced isolation, and an untold amount of uneccessary suffering and death:
- Death by lockdown: Nursing home deaths account for 70% of Ohio's overall total
- UK care homes record 29,000 excess deaths during lockdown, lack of critical care partly to blame
- "Staggering number" of extra deaths in community unrelated to COVID-19 because people are not getting access to care
- As a GP in the NHS I witnessed first-hand the catastrophic way Matt Hancock failed the old and vulnerable in care homes
- Did care homes use powerful sedatives to speed Covid deaths? Number of prescriptions for the drug midazolam doubled during height of the pandemic
- Cuomo admin buried scientific paper on nursing home COVID deaths: report
A screenshot from the article and an online archive of the passage points out the surfacing evidence.
Comment: So the vaccinated can infect others and a large proportion of those hospitalized due to COVID are double-vaxxed according to UK and Australian health spokespersons (even though their statements have now been "corrected"). Can anyone remind us what the point of the vaccine is because it certainly isn't doing anything it was purported to do!? See also:
- Busting the myth that vaccination prevents transmission
- COVID vaccine shedding hurting unvaccinated? Dr. Lee Merritt explains
- Passengers on first fully vaccinated North American cruise test positive for COVID
- Duck and weave: Psaki refuses to provide number of 'breakthrough' cases of COVID in the White House













Comment: For more on the treatment of COVID-19 using ivermectin see: