Health & Wellness
For the last four years, attorneys with the Fluoride Action Network have been fighting a legal battle against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency over whether water fluoridation violates the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). A recent ruling by the judge in the case has now set the stage for a federal trial which will include three international experts in neurotoxicity testifying on the dangers of water fluoridation.
The Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is set to argue that water fluoridation violates the TSCA provisions which prohibit the "particular use" of a chemical which has been found to present an unreasonable risk to the general public. Under section 21 of the TSCA citizens are allowed to petition the EPA to regulate or ban individual chemicals.
The FAN began their legal battle in November 2016 when they joined with five organizations and five individuals to present a Citizens' Petition under Section 21 of TSCA to the EPA. The Citizens' Petition calls on the EPA to prohibit the addition of fluoridation chemicals to U.S. water based on the growing body of evidence showing that fluoride is a neurotoxin at doses currently used in communities around the United States.
Pascal Soriot is chief executive of AstraZeneca, a British-Swedish pharmaceutical company that is challenging biotech company Moderna, the U.S. frontrunner in the race. Soriot said on May 24th, "The vaccine has to work and that's one question, and the other question is, even if it works, we have to be able to demonstrate it. We have to run as fast as possible before the disease disappears so we can demonstrate that the vaccine is effective."
COVID-19, like other coronaviruses, is expected to mutate at least every season, raising serious questions about claims that any vaccine will work. A successful vaccine has never been developed for any of the many strains of coronaviruses, due to the nature of the virus itself; and vaccinated people can have a higher chance of serious illness and death when later exposed to another strain of the virus, a phenomenon known as "virus interference." An earlier SARS vaccine never made it to market because the laboratory animals it was tested on contracted more serious symptoms on re-infection, and most of them died.
Researchers working with the AstraZeneca vaccine claimed success in preliminary studies because its lab monkeys all survived and formed antibodies to the virus, but data reported later showed that the animals all became infected when challenged, raising serious questions about the vaccine's effectiveness.
Comment: More on the development of Covid-19 vaccines:
- Damage control: Bill Gates tries to counter Covid-19 vaccine conspiracy theories he's pegged to
- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: 100% Injury rate in subjects from Gates-backed Covid-19 vaccine - UK Vax group fails
- Further anomalies found with the Oxford coronavirus vaccine
- A look at Bill Gates' funding partnership with Moderna - America's tangled vaccine web
- COVID-19 vaccines: Continuing the long history of medical experimentation on children
But what's really going on when you rinse a cap-load of antibacterial chemicals around your mouth? What does that to your body, and to other kinds of microorganisms that may actually be beneficial to health?
As a study showed last year, the downstream effects can be surprising, and far-reaching too, affecting much more than just your dental wellbeing.
In an experiment led by scientists from the UK and Spain, researchers found that the simple act of using mouthwash after exercising can reduce one of the benefits of exercise: lowering blood pressure.

A recent New York Times article claims that “If you care about the working poor, about racial justice, and about climate change, you have to stop eating animals.” This isn’t quite right.
This isn't quite right.
When the "food pyramid" was released in 1970, we thought we finally understood the problem with red meat. Since then, Americans have dutifully followed the food pyramid, and red meat consumption per capita is down almost 30 percent.
We now have sickest population in the history of the world. I was one of those sick people.
Comment: See also:
- Meat eaters tend to have better psychological health than vegetarians
- Why is the World Health Organisation anti-meat?
- No Evil Foods, a faux leftist vegan-meat company, busts union drive
- It's the 'End of Meat', so shut up & drink the oil: NYT tries to browbeat its readers into a plant diet
- New Zealand schools to teach pupils to avoid dairy and meat
- Eating meat improves mental health and one in three vegetarians are depressed, study claims
- Bill Gates and Richard Branson are betting lab-grown meat might be the food of the future
Published in Molecular Psychiatry, the study found a section of DNA that switches on key genes in parts of the brain that control alcohol intake and mood.
Identified for the first time, these sections of DNA may act as future drug targets for the development of precision medicines to treat alcohol abuse and anxiety in men.
Dr. Alasdair MacKenzie who led the study at the University of Aberdeen explains: "Alcohol abuse kills millions of people around the world each year and can account for up to 8% of all male deaths. On top of this, there is evidence that the lockdown has contributed to increased anxiety and alcohol intake.
Comment: Obviously this is a complex issue, because the tendency to hide in mice is also a necessary survival mechanism, and its likely that this anxiety in humans also serves a purpose too, but what this study is showing genetically has been understood for a while by other fields of study, that traumatized individuals are likely to self-medicate. Moreover other studies have shown that this trauma can actually pass down throught the generations epigenetically:
- Brain circuit that controls compulsive drinking has been discovered in mice, offering hope of a cure for alcoholism
- 'Relapses are through the roof, overdoses are through the roof': How the pandemic Is upping substance abuse
- The Brain Maintains Language Skills in Spite of Alcohol Damage By Drawing From Other Regions
The ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the EPA "substantially understated the risks" of the dicamba herbicides and "failed entirely to acknowledge other risks."
"The EPA made multiple errors in granting the conditional registrations," the court ruling states.
Comment: See also:
- Dicamba goes on trial: The history behind Monsanto's friendship-wilting weed killer
- Pumping up the herbicides: Roundup, dicamba and 2,4-D
- With Roundup on the rocks, Monsanto hatches plan for replacement with drift-prone crop destroying dicamba
- Monsanto sues Arkansas plant board for banning disputed dicamba herbicide
- More Dicamba devastation: 'Miracle' weed killer that was supposed to save farms is killing them instead
- Tennessee restricts use of Monsanto's dicamba pesticide as problems spread
- Dicamba devastation: Farmers in 10 states sue Monsanto
- Monsanto celebrates approval of deadly herbicide "Dicamba", continues to suppress cancer research
One or more Members of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Suggest Process Lacks Scientific Integrity and Rigor
The Nutrition Coalition, a group that aims to bring rigorous science to nutrition policy, today released a letter detailing allegations suggesting there is a serious threat to the integrity and trustworthiness of our nation's federal nutrition policy. The allegations were made by one or more members of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC), a powerful group of experts under the direction of the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services (USDA-HHS). The letter expresses concerns about the Committee's process and in particular, its review of the scientific studies underpinning what will be the next iteration of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA), due out at the end of this year. In light of these revelations, the Nutrition Coalition is calling for the expert report by the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee to be delayed to ensure adequate time for a thorough investigation of these allegations.
"The American people deserve trustworthy nutrition policy based on a comprehensive review of the most rigorous science, especially during this public health crisis when diet-related chronic diseases are among the leading risk factors for worsened outcomes from Covid-19," stated Nina Teicholz, Executive Director of the Nutrition Coalition. "These allegations range from deleting scientific reviews without public notice to failing to adopt reforms mandated by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). The NASEM identified numerous ways that the DGA needs to be reformed in order to ensure a scientifically rigorous process and, in their words, for this policy to be 'trustworthy.'"
Comment: See also:
- Federal dietary guidelines need to cut carbohydrates
- Diabetes and obesity still on the rise - Billions spent promoting dietary guidelines hasn't made a dent
- Seventh-day Adventist Church holds massive influence in official dietary guidelines and the push towards vegetarianism
- Nina Teicholz: The limits of sugar guidelines
- New Study Finds Same Thing Past Studies Have Found: Dietary Guidelines on Fat Consumption NOT Supported by Science
- Top cardiologist blasts nutrition guidelines
- Truthful Dietary Guidelines article won't be retracted
"Dietary choices have been a powerful indicator of social class and subsequent mate selection (e.g., whom we marry) since antiquity. Consequently, 'what we eat' and 'how we eat' are integral parts of our identity and directly influence our health via physiological, social, and psychological pathways," explained study author Urska Dobersek, an assistant professor at the University of Southern Indiana.
"Therefore, given the dramatic surge in veganism and mental illness over the past two decades, a rigorous systematic review was a necessary first step in examining the relations between meat and mental health."
Comment: Whether vegan and vegetarian diets cause mental health issues (likely) or people with mental issues tend towards vegetarian and vegan diets, the message is rather clear: Abstaining from meat is for crazy people.
See also:
- Why is the World Health Organisation anti-meat?
- It's the 'End of Meat', so shut up & drink the oil: NYT tries to browbeat its readers into a plant diet
- Eating meat improves mental health and one in three vegetarians are depressed, study claims
- Demand for meat rising despite deluge of plant-based alternatives, report finds
- Objective:Health - Meat and Mood - Does Red Meat Consumption Really Lead to Depression?
- Spreading fear: PETA is being mocked and ridiculed by social media users after implying that eating meat may cause coronavirus
To combat this and future pandemics, we need to talk about not only the masks that go over our mouths but the food that goes into them. Next month, an expert committee will issue its advisory report on the federal government's official dietary guidelines for the next five years. First published in 1980, the guidelines are meant to encourage healthy eating, but they have self-evidently failed to stem the ever-rising rates of obesity, diabetes and other chronic diseases in the U.S.
Comment: It really isn't that complicated. Those with underlying health conditions are more likely to die from any virulent viral or bacterial infection. Getting people onto a healthy diet is the best way to both decrease underlying health concerns and protect them from acute disease. If people realized this, and started taking proactive measures towards their own health, much of the fear around the coronavirus would be mitigated considerably.
See also:
- Dr Aseem Malhotra: It's time to have an honest conversation about the risks of excess weight
- Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Lifestyle tips to hedge against respiratory illness
- Beyond weightloss: Low-carb diets could reduce diabetes, heart disease and stroke risk even if people don't lose weight
- The cardiovascular risk reduction benefits of a low-carbohydrate diet outweigh the potential increase in LDL-cholesterol
- Research suggests ketogenic diet helpful in treating asthma
Admitting the virus is no more deadly than the flu, saying there's no evidence it can be spread from surfaces (like your groceries), revealing the unliklihood of anyone becoming reinfected and even (gasp!) that the lockdowns did NOT work to slow the virus transmission. It's almost as if the mainstream media have been reading Sott.net!
Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we look at the slow trickle of truth making its way into the daily headlines. Are people finally going to realize the epic virus that forced them to into their homes, made them lose their jobs and kept them from their loved ones was a total nothingburger?
And check us out on Brighteon!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here.
Running Time: 00:32:32
Download: MP3 — 29.8 MB














Comment: See: Flouride: Poison in your tap water