Welcome to Sott.net
Sun, 25 Jul 2021
The World for People who Think

Health & Wellness
Map


Pills

Pill version of Covid-19 vaccine to start clinical trial in Israel

Pills
© Steve Buissinne/Pixabay
A capsule version of the Covid-19 vaccine could be a "game changer" in countries with a low immunization rate, its developer has said.

Jerusalem-based Oramed Pharmaceuticals has received approval from the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center to start a clinical trial on 24 unvaccinated volunteers for a single-dose capsule version of a vaccine that is being developed by Indian firm Premas Biotech.

Comment: It is clear that the PTB will go to any length to insert the dangerous and experimental "vaccines" into people's bodies. Since their vaccination campaign is not going as they expected, they are developing oral administration of the vaccine instead.

Will adults, and in particular children, be more willing to swallow a pill than take an injection? Or could this be used for nefarious purposes in the future?

They did a similar thing with the polio vaccine in 2019, fast-tracking an oral vaccine due to vaccine-induced outbreaks. After oral administration of the vaccine, the polio vaccine version of the virus was spreading uncontrollably through Africa. It would not be surprising if the same thing happened with the Covid virus.

See also:


Syringe

Birth defects, paralysis, stroke & blindness - UK Gov. release 24th report on adverse reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines

vaccine band aid plaster
The UK Government / MHRA have released the 24th update on adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines which have been reported to the Yellow Card scheme, and this week we delved deeper into the report than ever before and discovered an extremely concerning set of reactions which have been overlooked - birth defects.

The Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) gave emergency approval to the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab on the 8th December 2021. Since this date, the MHRA Yellow Card scheme has been open to the public, doctors, and nurses; allowing them to report any adverse reactions that may have occurred due to any of the Covid-19 vaccines.

The first report released by the UK Government / MHRA in early February covered adverse reactions which had been reported up to the 24th January 2021. This report included reactions such as blindness, stroke, miscarriage, sudden death, and many other fatalities.

Comment: As the truth about the harms caused by Covid-19 shots continues to trickle out, one wonders how long the public will be able to be kept in the dark. The truth is out there for all to see, with even a little digging, yet it seems most of the public remains uninterested.

See also:


Arrow Down

Pfizer vaccine efficacy drops to 39% in preventing infection - Israel's Health Ministry

pfizer
© Reuters
The report adds the efficacy of the vaccine in preventing serious illness has also dropped and now stands at 91%. The efficacy in preventing hospitalizations among vaccinated now stands at 88%. Preparing to administer the COVID vaccine in Tel Aviv
The Health Ministry reported Thursday the efficacy of Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine in preventing infection has dropped to 39% but the effectiveness in preventing severe illness still remains relatively high.


Comment: Even without the vaccine, the majority of people will not develop severe illness from the coronavirus.


These figures were published three weeks after Ynet first revealed the decline in the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine against the Delta variant.

Comment: There are few if any deaths of children due to coronavirus around the world, even those with comorbidities were at next to no risk, so there is no reason to inject children with experimental substances; moreover, they're more likely to die because vaccine side effects than the coronavirus Dr. Yeadon warns: Children 50 TIMES more likely to die from covid vaccine than from virus


Syringe

'Unnecessary, misleading, catastrophic': Senior European physicians co-author expert statement on COVID vaccine for children

Europe doctor
Eminent European physicians and scientists this month co-authored an expert statement regarding Comirnaty-COVID-19 mRNA vaccine for children, outlining their expert opinions that "vaccination of adolescents for COVID-19 is unnecessary, claims demonstrating efficacy are misleading, and the safety profiles are catastrophic."

Comment: It is tragic to witness parents willingly hand over their children to Big Pharma for experimental gene therapy shots, which pose a much greater risk to health than COVID-19 ever did, considering children have an almost 100% survival rate.


Syringe

Vaccine safety update

vaccines
This is the ninth of the regular round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the eighth one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic's other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments.

At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they're in use under temporary and not full market authorisation.

This has been done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government's page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr Tess Lawrie recently wrote an open letter to Dr June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: "The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans," a claim that has been "fact checked" here.) We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.

Syringe

Doesn't add up to Hysteria: COVID-19 mortality rate among children is even lower than previously thought

Ambulance
We've known since the early weeks of the pandemic that age is the single best predictor of COVID-19 mortality, and that the risk of death for young people is vanishingly small.

A letter in the New England Journal of Medicine reported that zero Swedish children aged 1-16 died of COVID-19 up to the end of June 2020. And only 15 were admitted to the ICU, of whom four had a serious underlying health condition.

Of course, England is a much larger country than Sweden, and it's been a whole other year since those Swedish data were collected. So how many English children have died of COVID-19?

In an unpublished study, Clare Smith and colleagues sought to identify the number of COVID-19 deaths among people aged under 18 between March 2020 and February 2021. They examined data from the National Child Mortality Database, which was linked to testing data from Public Health England and comorbidity data from national hospital admissions.

Comment: See also:


SOTT Logo Radio

Objective:Health - ITN: Covid Vaccine News Roundup

O:H header
Every week it seems like more and more jaw-dropping news is coming out about Covid shots. On this episode of Objective:Health, we cover the latest news on the mRNA and other shots, including: Dr. Yeadon warning that children are 50 times more likely to die from the vaccines than from Covid; Mercola reporting that to prevent three deaths the Covid jab kills two; rare autoimmune hepatitis coming from the Covishield vaccine and a British report calling for an the end to the Covid vaccination campaign.

Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we talk about all the Covid vaccine information you're not going to see on the evening news!


For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:

♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
♥Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channel/objectivehealth
♥LBRY: https://lbry.tv/@objectivehealth:f
♥Odysee: https://odysee.com/@objectivehealth:f

And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16H-nK-N0ANdsA5JFTT12_HU5nUYRVS9YcQh331dG2MI/edit?usp=sharing

Running Time: 00:32:29

Download: MP3 — 29.7 MB


Attention

Drug trials underestimated side effects

Drug Trials
© SebastianRushworth.com
One commonly used trick in drug trials is to exclude any group that might make the drug look worse, such as those that are more likely to experience side effects. A good recent example of this is the covid vaccine trials, which largely excluded people with auto-immune diseases (more likely to develop an auto-immune disease after vaccination), people with allergies (more likely to have an allergic reaction to the vaccine), and, of course, the elderly (less likely to develop immunity after getting the vaccine, and more likely to become seriously sick from it).

These three groups are all frequently excluded from trials, and the exclusion is particularly galling when it comes to the elderly, because they are a big segment of the population, and they are also usually the most likely to end up actually using the drugs being tested.

When drug companies have gotten a drug approved, and move on to market the drug, they will studiously avoid mentioning the fact that large segments of the population were excluded from the trials. When drug reps show their flashy powerpoints to gatherings of doctors, say for a new drug to lower blood pressure, they will always present impressive looking graphs of benefit, and they will of course point out how safe their drug was shown to be in the trials. Not once will they mention that the groups of patients the doctors will primarily be prescribing the drug to weren't even included in the trials.

The doctors will then happily go off and prescribe the drug to multi-morbid 90 year olds, which might explain why prescription drugs are now the third leading cause of death in the western world.

The manipulation of who is included in trials is probably one of the main reasons why findings of side effects always end up being much higher in reality than in clinical trials. It might explain, for example, why muscle pain is a massively common side effect of statins in the real world, while being vanishingly rare in the statin trials (as Dr. Malcolm Kendrick has written about in detail).

Sheeple

Cloth face masks might comfort you but they won't protect you from Covid

cloth face masks
© Danilova Janna/Shutterstock
Pretty, but useless
A standard face masks act as nothing more than a "comfort blanket" and offers little protection against Covid, a scientific adviser to SAGE has said ahead of the partial easing of the mask mandate on Monday. The Telegraph has the story.

Comment: More from the referenced article:
'We are entrenching bad behaviour'

However, other studies have cast doubt on their effectiveness. A subsequent Danish study involving 6,000 people concluded that there was no statistical difference in infection spread in non-wearers, while data on US states with non-mandated usage failed to show a correlated uptick in cases.

"The public were demanding something must be done, they got masks, it is just a comfort blanket," Dr Axon noted. "But now it is entrenched, and we are entrenching bad behaviour.

"All around the world you can look at mask mandates and superimpose on infection rates, you cannot see that mask mandates made any effect whatsoever.

"The best thing you can say about any mask is that any positive effect they do have is too small to be measured."



Biohazard

Carcinogen found in 5 Johnson & Johnson sunscreens, lab testing finds benzene in 78 other products

johnson sunscreen
© Neutrogena/Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson is recalling five of its aerosol sunscreen products. Above, images of Neutrogena Ultra Sheer aerosol sunscreen, one of the recalled products.
Johnson & Johnson is recalling five of its aerosol sunscreen products after the sprays were found to contain low levels of the chemical benzene, a known human carcinogen.

The company made the announcement this week after conducting its own internal tests. The recalled products are: Neutrogena Beach Defense aerosol sunscreen, Neutrogena Cool Dry Sport aerosol sunscreen, Neutrogena Invisible Daily defense aerosol sunscreen, Neutrogena Ultra Sheer aerosol sunscreen and Aveeno Protect + Refresh aerosol sunscreen, according to a statement from the company. The recall applies to all sizes and SPFs of these products, according to The Washington Post.

Comment: And this is one of the manufacturers that has been entrusted to make coronavirus vaccines? More blood clots: US govt pauses rollout of Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine

See also: US Alzheimer drug received FDA approval despite no proven benefits, investigation launched