Health & Wellness
There have even been a number of experiments involving the treatment of various conditions involving the deliberate infection of subjects with different types of parasites. It's known as 'helminth therapy' and, while it's not universally helpful across the board, a statistically significant number are reporting beneficial results.
Join us on this episode of Objective:Health as we look into this slightly icky but truly promising new (or very old) medical procedure. And stay tuned for Zoya's Pet Health Segment, as she tells us all about pets who can detect psychic phenomena!
And check us out on Brighteon!
For other health-related news and more, you can find us on:
♥Twitter: https://twitter.com/objecthealth
♥Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/objecthealth/
And you can check out all of our previous shows (pre YouTube) here
Running Time: 00:59:57
Download: MP3 — 54.5 MB

Recent research has found that the gut can affect people's mental state, but traditional Chinese medicine has believed this for thousands of years.
Research increasingly shows that the connection between our "gut" and our brains - especially our emotions and mental health - is closer than has ever been imagined. In recent headlines and medical research papers, doctors and researchers are employing a new term for the gut: the second brain.
Research such as that from doctors Braden Kuo and Allan Goldstein at Massachusetts General Hospital, the US, who found that bacteria in the gut can affect mood, cognition and behaviour is increasingly exciting to fellow doctors and scientists.
But practitioners of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can be left exasperated. They say that Chinese medicine has understood the connection between the gut and the body's overall health for thousands of years.

Truth and lies: Iwao Mitsuishi claimed CT scans are too "scientific" in a book titled "Medical Common Sense is Full of Lies."
It's not just politics. Politics is at least comprehensible. We may err, misunderstand and misjudge, but politics speaks our language and invites our participation. Not so medicine. Healthy, we want nothing to do with it. Ill, we turn to it with blind, ignorant, sometimes desperate faith.
What else can we do? Our bodies are strangers to us — sometimes hostile strangers. We wouldn't recognize our internal organs if we saw them. When a politician says, "Trust me," we instinctively do the opposite. When a doctor says "Trust me," we put ourselves and our organs in his or her hands — the sicker we are, the more eagerly.
Comment: It appears Iwao Mitsuishi's books are only available in Japanese but one can hope that, eventually, any of his worthwhile findings will come to light:
- Eat Fat, Live Long - the Real Food of Okinawa
- Italian island of Sardinia home to some of the oldest people in the world, what's their secret?
- Spain will overtake Japan in world's life expectancy ranking, US set to plunge to 64th by 2040
- The Health & Wellness Show: IV Vitamin C: The Miracle Cure You're Not Supposed to Know About
- The Health & Wellness Show: The Assault on Salt
- The Health & Wellness Show: The Devil's in the Details: Diet Dogma and Fine-Tuning Your Own
- The Health & Wellness Show: The Truth about Tobacco and the Benefits of Nicotine
In girls, frequent use of social media harmed their health by leading to inadequate sleep, inadequate physical activity and exposing them to cyberbullying, according to the study published Tuesday in the journal Lancet. The same did not hold true for boys who frequently use social media.
Researchers from University College London tracked the social media use of nearly 13,000 teens in the U.K. from when they were 13 to 16-years-old. They also evaluated the teens' own reports about their well-being, exposure to cyberbullying and time spent sleeping or being physically active.
The study found that 27% of the teens who were frequent users of social media reported high psychological stress. Among the teens who were infrequent users, only 17% reported high psychological stress.
The pathologization of emotion has been on the march for decades, especially in the US, where fully one sixth of the adult population takes an antidepressant or other psychiatric drug. Now the mental-health industry has a new target - loneliness.
Nearly half of Americans polled last year by health insurer Cigna said they lacked meaningful relationships or companionship. A solutions-based society might examine why so many people feel alienated from their peers despite the constant connectivity of smartphones and internet. A symptom-focused model, however, simply looks to stop them from feeling that way by any means necessary.
Loneliness is "worse than obesity," according to a raft of studies that have emerged linking the emotion to increased risk of premature death, and even rivals smoking. And like obesity - big business for Big Pharma, gastric bypass surgeons and weight-loss gurus - it requires medical intervention.
Conventionally grown strawberries tested by scientists at the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 2015 and 2016 contained an average of 7.8 different pesticides per sample, compared to 2.2 pesticides per sample for all other produce, according to EWG's analysis.
What's worse, strawberry growers use jaw-dropping volumes of poisonous gases to sterilize their fields before planting, killing every pest, weed and other living thing in the soil.
Comment: See also:
- Lab analysis shows strawberries and many fruits are contaminated with 20 different cancer causing pesticides
- Toxic Pesticide Approved for Strawberries in CA
- US: Neighbors, farmworkers ask EPA to ban use of fumigant in California strawberry fields
- Prescriptions: Beware the Seductive Strawberry
- Strawberry Show Down: No Methyl Iodide with My Shortcake, Please

Cows graze on a grass field at a farm in Schaghticoke, N.Y. The grass-fed movement is based on the idea of regenerative agriculture.
Comment: A dodgy figure, on many levels, but let's hear them out. See: Even if CO2 caused climate change, it would be the cars, not the cows
That's why many researchers are now calling for the world to cut back on its meat consumption. But some advocates say there is a way to eat meat that's better for the planet and better for the animals: grass-fed beef.
But is grass-fed beef really greener than feedlot-finished beef? Let's parse the science.
Comment: As long as these 'experts' continue to reduce everything down to 'carbon emissions' they'll be woefully out of touch with what a growing contingent of consumers is looking for. Many who are seeking grass-fed beef aren't buying the anthropogenic global warming narrative and are not basing their buying decisions on this narrative.
See also:
- Want to protect the planet? Eat more beef, not less
- Grass-fed Beef — The Most Vegan Item In The Supermarket
- Grass to the rescue: Why pasture raised beef is healthier for people and the soil
- Grassland Ecology 101 for vegans and synthetic meat marketers
- Grassland Ecology 202 for vegans: Calling for change that makes sense
- Don't let vegetarian environmentalists shame you for eating meat. Science is on your side

The Environmental Protection Agency told companies Thursday they would not approve labels which abide by California requirements to warn customers that glyphosate in Monsanto Roundup has been linked to cancer.
The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has listed glyphosate, a chemical compound-base for Monsanto Roundup herbicide weed killer, as causing cancer since July 2017. Furthermore, glyphosate was added to the state's Proposition 65 list, which requires businesses to warn customers about chemicals known to cause cancer.
The EPA defied that regulation Thursday by saying it will no longer approve product labels claiming glyphosate is known to cause cancer.
Comment: The EPA is absolutely shameless in their insistence that a known carcinogen is not carcinogenic. For them to state their 'independent evaluation' was more 'extensive and relevant' than the IARC finding is laughable. It is so obvious they've been paid off its pathetic.
See also:
- Epic Fail: The EPA is meant to protect us - the Monsanto trials suggest it isn't doing that
- EPA 'in bed' with Monsanto? Regulator ignores risks, affirms 'safety' of Roundup and Dow pesticide
- Roundup-Cancer lawsuit exposes cozy relationship between the EPA and Monsanto
- Spider Papers reveal how Monsanto & the EPA bury cancer research
- Poison Papers project: Believing we have a functional EPA is worse than having a non-functional EPA

The key is to educate people about where their food comes from and to encourage responsible consumption of beef and dairy produced to the highest standards.
Two thirds of UK farmland is under grass and in most cases cannot be used for other crops. The only responsible way to convert this into food is to feed it to cattle, which are capable of deriving 100 per cent of their nutrition from grass and therefore are more efficient on such land than chickens or pigs. Even on grassland where crops could be grown, ploughing it up to create arable farms would release huge amounts of carbon into the atmosphere and require the use of pesticides, herbicides and fertiliser, all of which can devastate biodiversity.
Comment: See also:
- Five 'eco-friendly' products that actually harm the environment
- Do as I say, not as I do: Vegetarian environmental activist tells people to cut meat from diet to save environment while she travels world in private jet
- Propaganda alert: UN climate change report wants humans to 'eat less meat' to 'save the earth'
- Meat tax proposed to combat climate change by two political parties in Germany
- Grassland Ecology 101 for vegans and synthetic meat marketers
- Grassland Ecology 202 for vegans: Calling for change that makes sense
- Don't let vegetarian environmentalists shame you for eating meat. Science is on your side
A recent study by the Environmental Working Group revealed something horrifying: Glyphosate, the active ingredient in the popular weedkiller Roundup, was present in 17 of the 21 oat-based cereal and snack products at levels considered unsafe for children. That includes six different brands of Cheerios, one of the most popular American cereals.
I've written before about the limits of corporate free speech when it comes to public safety, but on that occasion I discussed this insofar as it involved corporate-sponsored climate change denialism. Yet here we have something more tangible, more direct: The safe glyphosate limit for children is 160 parts per billion (ppb), yet Honey Nut Cheerios Medley Crunch has 833 parts per billion and regular Cheerios has 729 ppb. While the potential risks of glyphosate are fiercely debated, many scientists believe that it is linked to cancer.
Comment: The idea that corporations have constitutional rights is extremely harmful in many ways, the above article outlining only one of them. The idea that a fictional entity has 'rights' is absurd, yet it's used to allow corporations to get away with murder.
See also:
- Why are these 25 carcinogens still being sold in America?
- Forbes Writer: GMO Labeling Would Violate Corporate Speech Rights
- US: The Fight to End Corporate Personhood Heats Up
- Resolution Calling to Amend the Constitution Banning Corporate Personhood Introduced in Vermont
- 80 percent of your food contains carcinogens
- Lawsuit claims: Shampoos still contain carcinogens










Comment: See also:
- Chinese Botanical Medicine: Wikipedia claims it is fake, we are certain it is real
- Acupuncture Relieves Pain in Largest Study of Treatment
- Traditional Chinese medicine tongue diagnosis gains favour
And check out SOTT radio's: