Health & Wellness
Now add to that list psychological distress, which University of Washington researchers have found is also associated with air pollution. The higher the level of particulates in the air, the UW-led study showed, the greater the impact on mental health.
The study, published in the November issue of Health & Place, is believed to be the first to use a nationally representative survey pool, cross-referenced with pollution data at the census block level, to evaluate the connection between toxic air and mental health.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used to suppress acid production in the stomach and are among the most widely sold drugs in the world, but a new study reveals that long-term use of the medicine can increase stomach cancer risks by almost 250 percent.
The risks are associated with a bacterium called Helicobacter pylori, carried by more than half of the world's population - most often harmlessly, but in a small percentage of people, the bug has been tied to the development of stomach cancer.
Previous research found that people with an ongoing Helicobacter pylori infection taking a PPI stood a greater chance of developing a precursor to stomach cancer, called atrophic gastritis.
While the mechanism for this was unclear, it's long been considered that eliminating the infection prior to taking PPIs - which have been linked to various adverse effects - might reduce the prospects of getting cancer.
But the new research shows that might not be the case.
Comment: For more information, check out Vitamin C prevents side effects from the MMR vaccine
...in order to protect our children from any vaccination side effects, we give very high doses of vitamin C before, during (yes, even at the doctor's office) and after immunizations.
Why on earth we are still using gadolinium, a metal found in "contrast" agents used in many MRIs, has been shown to remain in some of our organs (like the brain, bones, and skin). However, according to the FDA and European Union agency, retained gadolinium isn't harmful.

Workers cleaning and disinfecting the tents where patients sleep at the health center.
But the plague, which has so far killed 123 and left hundreds infected, is a super-strain which is even more infectious and deadly than famous the Bubonic Plague of the 14th century.
The Madagascar Plague is actually three plagues.
The first is bubonic - the type which ravaged Europe and the Mediterranean in the thirteen hundreds, leaving up to 60 percent dead.
Comment: Actually, the bubonic plague was universally and unequivocally believed to be the cause of the Black Death in the thirteen hundreds, despite the fact that it is well-established as biologically impossible. For more information, see: New Light on the Black Death: The Viral and Cosmic Connection.
Comment: Here is a map of the affected areas:
And keep in mind, as the panic spreads (like it did with Ebola scare two years ago):
Dr Arthur Rakotonjanabelo said: "Plague is a disease of poverty, because it thrives in places with poor sanitary conditions and health services."The WHO has a long track record of hyping possible epidemics. Not to say that there never will be one, but is this it? Madagascar is routinely hit with plague outbreaks and we'll have to see how long it will take for this one to die down.
Health officials state that this particular outbreak is slated to last another six months and cite the practice of Famadihana as contributing to its spread.
The Sun yesterday reported how the outbreak has been fuelled by performing the ancient practice of Famadihana - which sees locals dig up deceased relatives and dance with them before they are re-buried.
It is feared the ceremony has helped spread an outbreak of pneumonic plague that has left more than 120 dead on the African island.
The country's health chief Willy Randriamarotia said: "If a person dies of pneumonic plague and is then interred in a tomb that is subsequently opened for a Famadihana, the bacteria can still be transmitted and contaminate whoever handles the body."
The tradition has been banned since the outbreak began, but it is feared ceremonies have taken place regardless.
Both men and women who have undergone the procedure have had to come to terms with the "horrendous" results of gender-reassignment surgery, Lord Robert Winston warned, as the number of people seeking the life-changing operations grows.
Winston presented statistics in support of his claims, indicating how many people are left regretting their decision to undergo surgeries, which result in changes to their bodies that are far from what they had desired.
Vaginal-reconstruction patients experience complications in a staggering 40 percent of cases, he told the Today program on BBC Radio 4. "Results are horrendous in such a big proportion of cases," he added.
Winston said the risks and implications of gender-reassignment surgery are not properly understood. Fertility can be damaged, he explained, and people who have their breasts removed "feel uncomfortable with what they've done" in 23 percent of cases.
The product, called NemaStrike, is supposed to protect crops from worms. It has been given the green light by US environmental regulators.
"There have been limited cases of skin irritation, including rashes, that appear to be associated with the handling and application of this seed treatment product," Brian Naber, US commercial operations lead for Monsanto, said in a letter to customers about NemaStrike, quoted by Reuters.

A patient has her waist measured as she takes part in an obesity prevention study at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago on Jan. 20, 2010.
Earlier this month, a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention added more detail: Approximately 631,000 Americans were diagnosed with a body fat-related cancer in 2014, accounting for 40% of all cancers diagnosed that year.
Increasingly, it seems not only that we are losing the war on cancer, but that we are losing it to what we eat and drink.
These new findings, while important, only tell us so much. The studies reflect whether someone is overweight upon being diagnosed with cancer, but they don't show that the excess weight is responsible for the cancer. They are best understood as a warning sign that something about what or how much we eat is intimately linked to cancer. But what?
When insulin rises to abnormally high levels and remains elevated, it can promote the growth of tumors directly and indirectly.
Comment: It's not just cancer that is connected to higher sugar intake. There are many other conditions that could be helped by reducing ones sugar and carbohydrate intake. See also:
- 146 reasons why sugar destroys your health
- How sugar destroys your health & literally makes you stupid
- Depression & carbs
- Elevated blood sugar relates to dementia
- 'Carbohydrates rot the brain': Neurologist slams grains as 'silent brain killers' - and says we should be eating a high-fat diet
In a study published in the open access journal eLife, the researchers show that skin - our largest organ, typically covering two square metres in humans - helps regulate blood pressure and heart rate in response to changes in the amount of oxygen available in the environment.
High blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular disease, such as heart attack and stroke. For the vast majority of cases of high blood pressure, there is no known cause. The condition is often associated with reduced flow of blood through small blood vessels in the skin and other parts of the body, a symptom which can get progressively worse if the hypertension is not treated.
Up to twelve NHS clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in the north-east of England have said they would rather use the equally safe and effective drug Avastin - which is ten times cheaper than that being offered by the companies - for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of sight loss.
The groups are advising doctors to prescribe the drug as an alternative to much more costly ones being offered by drug giants Novartis and Bayer. It has spurred doctors to accuse the drug companies of "dictating" how they should work.
Avastin, as an injection, costs £12 ($16), compared to the single doses of Novartis' Lucentis at £742, and Bayer's Eylea at £816. The CCGs claim adopting Avastin would save them £13.5 million a year, and pay for an extra 270 nurses in the region.
Comment: More details from the British Medical Journal:
In its anti-cancer drug, bevacizumab, drug developer Genentech has created what may be the world's first "not me" (as opposed to "me too") drug, say Robert Campbell and colleagues (doi:10.1136/bmj.e2941). Despite evidence that it works in macular degeneration, the manufacturers and marketers (Roche in the US, Novartis in the UK and elsewhere) are actively discouraging its use for this condition, even going so far as taking legal action to prevent such off-label use. Why? Because they want people to use their other drug, ranibuzimab, which is licensed for treating macular degeneration.
The bottom line is that ranibuzimab is about 12 times more expensive: Cheung and colleagues report that the UK could save close to £300m (€368m; $485m) a year if it were standard treatment. So are Roche and Novartis simply fighting to protect their profits? They say no, that they are also protecting patients from the cheaper drug's higher risk profile. Although data from the publicly funded CATT trial in the US found similar effectiveness and safety for the two drugs in treating macular degeneration, the safety of bevacizumab remains a worry. Concerns relate to its greater systemic absorption and the fact that it has to be decanted into smaller quantities for intraocular injection, which introduces the risk of infection.
In the UK, as Ingrid Torjesen reports (doi:10.1136/bmj.e3012), efforts are under way to get bevacizumab approved for use in macular degeneration despite resistance from Novartis. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has said it could appraise the drug if asked to by the Department of Health. Campbell and colleagues report that the department is waiting for the results of the IVAN trial in the UK, due to be published this month. But it is unlikely to resolve the safety concerns. Neither this nor the CATT trial was big enough to detect small but clinically relevant differences in adverse outcomes such as stroke, they say. Long term postmarketing surveillance is needed for that.














Comment: More reasons to avoid Proton Pump Inhibitors:
- Proton Pump Inhibitors: So dangerous that prescriptions border on being criminal
- Popular acid reflux drugs linked to silent kidney damage
- Acid reflux drugs increase risk of intestinal infections
There are much safer solutions for preventing and treating acid reflux: