
A BDS flag hangs off New York's Manhattan Bridge as NYU academia joins the movement.
It's unclear which companies NYU is invested in. The students and professors pushing for divestment under the name NYU Out of Occupied Palestine say the university is not transparent about its investments. But they suspect that the university, like other institutions in the U.S., has investments in U.S. companies that supply the Israeli army with weapons they use for assaults on Gaza and the occupation of the West Bank.
The call from professors is part of the larger boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement that has found some success in student governments, particularly in California. The BDS movement on campus has sparked conversation about Israel/Palestine and also lead to tensions between pro-Israel students and activists working for divestment. In March, NYU's Students for Justice in Palestine displayed a mock separation wall during Israeli Apartheid Week, while across the street pro-Israel students rallied with Israeli flags.
At NYU, students and faculty are not calling on the student government to pass a divestment resolution. They are taking a different path by deploying prominent professors to call for transparency in the school's investments and for divestment. It's similar to how Princeton University professors called for divestment last year.
The only university to have divested from companies linked to the occupation is Hampshire.














Comment: It is obvious, reading the petition, that the boycott by academia is not geared to all of Israel or all Jews but is pointedly specific in issues and circumstances. It does acknowledge that the vectored chain of support to Israel ultimately involves many different entities, including Western institutions of higher learning. Whether Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaigns impact Israel's economy and policy-making in the future enough to reign in its Palestinian vendetta remains to be seen. Any modicum of success in applying pressure on ultra-big business will likely have to come from a global consensus pursuing austerity measures against offending companies. (It won't be from congress!) Until that time, a buck is a buck and Israeli regime change isn't even a crap shoot.