Bombard's Body Language:

"Ellen says, "certain amount of time supposed to check out on it, right?" She's talking about the door the security guard checked on and the maintenance man. Jesus responds, "Yes we got, uh, notifications," and he gives us a quick raised eyebrow. No knowledge confirm between the two - between him and Ellen.

"Making sure that, uh, to secure them," and he searches for the word. "Or if already secure making..." and it's a general phrase that puts it in the mind statement of a policy of alarms and doors - "that uh, check on the doors..." - search again. A lot of searching with the mind, trying to remember the story that he's putting out.

While re-telling the story he relies heavily on emotion for memory. It's a memory trick; associating things to memory by emotion helps with recall. So if you've got a story in your mind and you associate it with something in your mind that is emotional it helps you to remember it better. Because he has no memory on any visuals of that event. That's not normal.

And he also is struggling with it, and you can see that when he does his slow eye-closing. So he's struggling to remember it.

Another part of the video, Stephen [Schuck] puts his hand on Jesus's back in comfort. It is an unnatural movement; it is not comforting and a friendly comfort. It is awkward and it's not on any cues that Jesus gives for Stephen to do that.

And you can tell by their talk and the same words that they use, the witnesses have corroborated with each other and have come up with a story together.

Also Ellen's touch on Jesus is on cue, and Jesus is giving no indication that he needs comforting when she does it."

• What Happens in Vegas, Stays in Vegas
• Las Vegas Massacre: What Really Happened - Trump and Iran, What's his Problem?

Critics, like Shaheen Ashraf of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women, question the religious neutrality narrative. "I define neutrality as being able to do what I choose and you are able to do what you choose and everyone else is able to do what they choose and that's neutral. Accepting each other as we are," Ashraf told CTV Montreal.
...
"Bus drivers are now being empowered to decide who gets a ride based on their understanding of the nuances of Muslim head scarves," pointed out Allison Hanes in the Montreal Gazette. "Are they going to get training on the difference between a hijab and a niqab? This law could not be worse for civil rights or social cohesion."

"Telling a woman how to dress - whether she's wearing a bikini or a burqa - is the opposite of feminism," continued Hanes. "And using the full weight of the state to marginalize one particular group, no matter how much thou doth protest that a law applies to everyone equally, is reprehensible."

Although Quebec politicians pushed the new policy as a feminist one, Canadian feminists commenting on it are largely unimpressed. "A bill that legislates clothing ends up linking emancipation of women to how little or how much they wear," wrote Shree Paradkar in The Star. "In doing so, it works against choice" and "should have been rejected."