Welcome to Sott.net
Sat, 09 Dec 2023
The World for People who Think

Society's Child

Yellow Vest

Farmer protests in France herald major clash on the horizon

farmer france
Farmers in the Brittany region of France on Wednesday staged a protest using tractors in the city of Rennes in response to the government's agricultural policies.

The protesting farmers argue that they are burdened with excessive regulations in the context of their agricultural activities.

According to local reports, upon reaching the headquarters of the Brittany Regional Council, the farmers spread straw in the parking lot and scattered official documents.

Comment: Whilst the French are famous for their readiness to protest, as we've seen elsewhere in the West, there is a concerted attack on farmers, and the food supply more generally, and it's only a matter of time before totalitarian legislation comes for France's farmers; as the following analysis from John Lichfield in TheLocal.fr details:
French farmers' signpost protests indicate a major clash on the horizon

If you're in rural France you might have seen village signposts turned upside down - rather than a simple prank this is a protest from young French farmers which could, writes John Lichfield, be the start of a major clash between farmers, environmentalists and the government.

Normandy has been turned upside down. So, it appears, have large parts of France.

In my corner of Calvados almost all the name signs at the edge of towns and village have been unbolted and replaced the wrong way up. A scribbled sign beside the road announces: "Nous marchons sur la tête." (We are walking on our heads).

Is this the action of a night-time gang of rural surrealists? Does it announce the return of the Gilets Jaunes?

No. It is part of an agricultural "rebellion of the signs" which started in the Gard in south-eastern France two weeks ago and has spread like a prairie fire across the country.

The protest, devised by Jeunes Agriculteurs, the young farmers organisation, warns of more disruptive action to come if the government does nothing to address a thicket of agricultural grievances.

French farmers protesting? How unusual.

Actually, it has become less common than it used to be. Farmers have been relatively quiet for several years. They snubbed the Gilets Jaunes protests which began in rural and outer suburban France five years ago.

The government evidently takes the threat of a farming revolt seriously. The Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne met agri-union leaders on Tuesday and caved in instantly to two of their main demands.

Farmers were supposed to pay out €47 million next year in increased licence fees for pumping water from the ground and for pumping pesticides and other chemicals into it. Those provisions have now been cut from the 2024 national budget before it even passed through parliament.

Other grievances remain. Farmers are furious, inter alia, about an unratified EU treaty with South America which would bring cheap Brazilian and Argentinian beef into France.

They also complain about the rise in the price of agricultural diesel fuel (on which they already pay much reduced tax) and delays in the payment of the EU subsidies (of which France receives €7.5 billion a year, more than any other country).

Most of all they complain that France has no clear strategy for balancing the needs of farming and an ecologically friendly future.

Philippe Bardy, leader of the main agricultural union, the FNSEA, in Tarn where the upside-down protest began, said: "Government wants us to change the way we farm; it also urges us to produce as much as possible in the name of food sovereignty. They pressure us to keep salaries high; they also demand that we reduce prices to calm inflation."

He has a point. Successive French governments for seven decades (with one or two exceptions) have pursued a schizophrenic, or hypocritical approach to farm policy.

They have paid lip-service to "family farms" and "France's exceptional food quality". They have allowed or encouraged EU subsidies to be weighted towards the intensive, chemical-drenched cereal farms and large agri-food industries which make France one of the world's largest mass exporters of food.

Farming unions are also to blame. The once dominant union, the Fédération Nationale des Syndicats d'Exploitant Agricoles (FNSEA), has traditionally been dominated by the cereals interests which have turned swathes of northern France into a green desert. It has resisted any radical shift in EU subsidies away from large farms to small.

There were 750,000 French farms at the turn of the 21st century. There are now around 450,000.

Despite this steep fall in numbers, two out of five French farmers earn less than €4,500 a year. Without subsidies from Brussels, tens of thousands of them would make a loss.

One of my neighbours in Normandy happens to be president of the Calvados beef farmers. He once explained to me the economics of what, for France, is a big-to-medium farm with 280 animals.

Daniel Courval and his wife Christine make €25,000 profit from two people's annual work but the farm receives €50,000 in subsidies from the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP.) Without them, they would make a €25,000 annual loss, and there would be no farm.

This fragile world is threatened by two new-ish factors. More than half of France's remaining farmers are over 50 years old and will retire before the end of the next decade. There is, so far, no clear national policy for encouraging would-be young farmers to replace them.

Farming is the second biggest source of carbon emissions in France after transport.

As detailed elsewhere, Co2 emissions have nothing to do with the Earth Changes occurring on our planet. Furthermore, Earth has entered a cooling phase, and the impact of this shift on food production, as it is currently practised, will be deadly: Leading Russian polar scientist: Cooling begins in 2030...Climate crisis a 'Globalist Scam'

Agriculture is supposed to reduce its greenhouse emissions such as methane- a large part of which emanates from the front and back of cows - by 16 percent by 2030.

And what of humans who eat the WEF-endorsed vegan diet which causes them to emit 7-times more 'emissions' of their own, when compared to meat eaters?

Beef production is falling but beef-eating is increasing again. The government wants France to produce more of its own food. This implies more intensive farming; the ecological transition implies the opposite. French farmers detest the idea of imports from countries which impose weaker environmental constraints than the EU.

Emmanuel Macron claims, with some reason, to be a farm-friendly President. He has promised to fight post-Brexit cuts in the EU farm subsidies. He is refusing to sign the Mercosur - South American - trade treaty in its present form.

But his government has skirted around or paid lip-service to solving the contradictions listed above, between productivity and ecology, mass-production and quality production, family farms and cheap food. So, until now, have the big farm unions.

At some time before the end of the year, the government is expected to address these issues in a "farming pact" or "orientation law for the future of agriculture.|"

If it fails to grapple with the core of the problem - and possibly even more so if it does - rural France could be turned upside down for real next year.


Zelensky party MP tells Ukrainian women to go to the front lines

© www.peoples.ru
Ukrainian lawmaker Mariana Bezuglaya • Servant of the People party
The appeal comes as Kiev ponders tightening mobilization methods...

All Ukrainians, including women, who wish to help the country should enlist in the military, lawmaker Mariana Bezuglaya from President Vladimir Zelensky's ruling 'Servant of the People' party said on Tuesday.

In a Facebook post marking International Volunteer Day, Bezuglaya thanked everyone who had already signed up to the military, but demanded more enlistment in 2024.
"The duty of the state is to provide everything that's needed; the duty of the citizens is to pay taxes for it. The best volunteering today is to join the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The people are the state; as the people, so the state."
Less than an hour later, responding to a torrent of comments, Bezuglaya doubled down.
"Dear mobilized servicemen, do you want new people to come to your unit? To strengthen you? To give you a rest? That's why I said the best volunteering for 2024 is to join the AFU. This also applies to women."


Freeing ourselves from the clutches of big tech

© noemag.com
Right to repair and other efforts to liberate technology from monopolistic corporations is a precondition for winning many vital societal battles.

In 2020, 75% of Massachusetts voters voted in favor of an automotive right-to-repair ballot initiative, which would force auto manufacturers to share access to diagnostic information with car owners and independent mechanics, so any mechanic could fix your car. You wouldn't be locked into taking it to the manufacturer.

The people of Massachusetts were pretty adamant: They wanted to choose their own mechanics. They had voted even more forcefully for a very similar right-to-repair initiative in 2012.

The problem is that right to repair only came into effect in August. The carmakers had so much ready cash (much of it accumulated by gouging drivers on maintenance) that they were able to pay an army of lawyers to challenge the law in court. In the decade since Massachusetts voters affirmed their overwhelming support for automotive right to repair, the actual state of it in Massachusetts went into freefall, with an ever-growing proportion of the cars on the road becoming inaccessible to independent mechanics. And it's still on shaky ground, not fully enforced, and carmakers are deactivating some of the features in cars so they don't have to share the specifics of how to repair them.

The mechanics were the first casualties of this attack. Drivers who brought their cars in for repairs would have to be turned away because the local independent mechanic just couldn't diagnose their problems. Independent mechanics closed down shops and exited the trade — or went to work for dealerships, who had a buyer's market for their labor and could name their prices and terms.

Drivers were the second casualty: There was no official list of all the cars that independent mechanics could fix. If you crossed your fingers and went to the local mechanic you'd used for years, there was a chance they could fix your car but a growing probability that they'd get it up on the lift and tell you they couldn't even attempt the repair, and off to the dealership you would have to go.

Creditors and investors were the third casualties: Mechanics struggled to service their bank loans or pay back the investors who'd taken a chance on their business.

Mechanics learned not to try to buck the system. Drivers learned not to try to go around the dealership's monopoly. The banks and investors learned never to bet against Big Car.


5th Circuit rules Texas must remove river border buoys

buoy barrier
© Brandon Bell/Getty Images
Rio Grande buoy barrier near Eagle Pass, Texas
A federal appeals court on Friday ruled that Texas must remove a series of buoys in its river border with Mexico that had generated a wave of backlash from immigration advocates and Democratic lawmakers.

In a 2-1 decision, a panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Texas' request to overrule a federal district judge, who ordered the state in September to remove the controversial barrier. Judge Dana Douglas, an appointee of President Joe Biden, wrote in the panel's majority opinion that the district judge had appropriately "considered the threat to navigation and federal government operations on the Rio Grande, as well as the potential threat to human life the floating barrier created."

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott first deployed the barrier — a roughly 1,000-foot stretch of orange spherical buoys connected by heavy metal cables, complete with an anti-dive net beneath it — in early July and subsequently claimed that it had deterred thousands of people from crossing. The Department of Justice sued the state, arguing that it obstructed U.S. waterways in violation of federal environmental law.

In September, U.S. District Judge David A. Ezra, an appointee of Ronald Reagan, ruled that the buoys likely obstructed the flow of the Rio Grande in a way that required congressional authorization. That reasoning derives from an 1899 law called the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act, which requires federal approval for obstructions built in navigable waters.


Seattle banned landlords from rejecting tenants based on criminal records. Will the Supreme Court step in?

© Shane Srogi/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
Seattle skyline
The political push behind the law was well-meaning. But it will backfire on many prospective renters...

A yearslong battle over property rights in Seattle may soon have national implications as various groups pressure the Supreme Court to analyze the constitutionality of a law banning landlords from rejecting tenants based on their criminal histories.

In 2017, the city passed the Fair Chance Housing Ordinance, prohibiting landlords from conducting criminal background checks on potential renters, from using information on criminal histories to exclude tenants, and from increasing rents and security deposits for such applicants. The sole exception in the law pertains to prospective renters who have been convicted of a sex offense as an adult, but even then, landlords must convince the Seattle Office for Civil Rights that they have a "legitimate business reason" for denial.

Stock Down

Detroit cut its murder rate to a 60 year low by simply ignoring liberal crime policies

detroit police officer
© SETH HERALD/AFP via Getty Images
Detroit, Michigan, cut its murder rate down to a 60-year-low by simply ignoring liberal crime policies, holding criminals accountable and hiring more police, a report from the city showed.

The city recorded 228 homicides this year as of Nov. 30, marking an 18% drop compared to the same time last year, according to the report. Detroit hit its lowest homicide rate in 60 years back in 2018 when it recorded 261 homicides, meaning 2023 could soon make a new record, Detroit Free Press noted.

In order to make the historic moment happen, leaders simply did the obvious: Locked criminals up.


Denmark sends military into cities amid 'elevated terror threat'

denmark military
© Sergei Gapon/AFP
Danish soldiers patrol the area of the port of Aarhus, Denmark where military vehicles of the US army are parked, on January 16, 2023.
Amid a high terrorist threat from Islamists, the ruling Social Democrats and Liberals in Denmark are taking decisive measures. To address the threat posed by radical Islamists, the Danish army will be activated to support the 11,360 police officers in safeguarding Jewish institutions.

Comment: Except, over the last decade, a significant number of these alleged hate crimes were later revealed to have been hoaxes perpetrated by people connected to the Jewish community.

Similar to scenes witnessed in other European cities, armed soldiers in wheeled armored vehicles and off-road vehicles will now patrol road junctions and key locations in major Danish cities. Defense Minister Troels Lund Poulsen emphasizes the seriousness of the threat, leading to the deployment of the armed forces starting December 6th, European media reported.

Comment: Whilst there are indeed random attacks by unstable people, from both sides, it seems the greater threat emanates from the establishment and its demonstrable involvement in the worst of these attacks: 1 tourist dead after Paris knife attack, assailant was known by authorities for terrorist plans & radical Islam views

See also:

Life Preserver

'Hopium and defense' is all Ukraine has to sustain itself as NATO weapons dry up

Ukraine's destroyed T-64 tank
© Sputnik International
Ukraine's destroyed T-64 tank is seen in the Russian special operation zone.
With its supply of Western weapons dwindling and little sign of change from the NATO powers, Ukraine will be incapable of launching another counteroffensive like last summer, an analyst told Sputnik. However, barring a mutiny or political crisis, a collapse of the Ukrainian war effort isn't necessarily imminent.

White House Office of Management and Budget Director Shalanda Young told federal lawmakers on Monday that the US was "out of money to support Ukraine in this fight."

"There is no magical pot of funding available to meet this moment. We are out of money - and nearly out of time," Young wrote. "Without congressional action, by the end of the year we will run out of resources to procure more weapons and equipment for Ukraine and to provide equipment from US military stocks."

Comment: There's also the possibility that, whilst some in the Kiev-junta may be willing to negotiate some kind of peace agreement with Russia, the extremists may become desperate enough that they resort to a false flag of some kind: Ukraine blocks ex-president Poroshenko from leaving


White House interns pen letter demanding ceasefire in Gaza

© AP/Reuters/Leah Millis/KJN
In letter sent to President Joe Biden, interns call for ceasefire in Gaza, end to Israeli apartheid and a free Palestine
In another sign of growing dissent brewing in Washington over the Biden administration's steady support for Israel's military campaign in Gaza, a group of more than 40 interns at the White House have signed a letter demanding President Joe Biden call for a permanent ceasefire.

In a letter shared with Middle East Eye, dozens of interns from the White House and the Executive Office of the President say they can "no longer remain silent on the ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people". The interns did not sign their names to the letter, opting to remain anonymous.

Comment: Whilst this might simply result in a further filtering out of what remains of those with a conscience (as happened in various industries during the contrived coronavirus crisis), governments have come to rely on this kind of labour to function, and so the US perhaps miscalculated in thinking that it could get away with this kind of criminality (as it has done before) without consequence; because this may compel whistleblowers to come forward, or it may simply result in a significant reduction of capable lackeys that the hegemon relies on to function.

No Entry

Cancel the King: Charles 'disgraced himself, the monarchy & the UK with his half-witted' speech to UN climate summit

King charles
It is time to sweep the monarchy away

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

For the first time, many of us who have hitherto been firmly and cheerfully loyal to the Crown are talking openly about getting rid of the monarchy. The late Queen Elizabeth the Great was the perfect constitutional monarch. She did not meddle in politics and nearly always kept her opinions to herself. Her noble example and her lifetime of devoted service kept the "Great" in Great Britain.

Not so the Climate King. He disgraced himself, the monarchy and the United Kingdom with his half-witted and nakedly partisan political address to the climate conference in Abu Dhabi.

Most of His Majesty's subjects now disagree with the climate nonsense, not least because we cannot afford it. Electricity prices in Britain are six to eight times those in Russia and China, India and Pakistan, the four Communist-led giants of the East, whose leaders know that global warming is a net benefit, not a "climate emergency", not least because over the years, and at their request, my team have quietly briefed most of them.