Welcome to Sott.net
Tue, 02 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Society's Child
Map

Biohazard

Sacking of wildlife biologists and chief medical officer linked to glyphosate

Rod Cumberland and Eilish Cleary

Rod Cumberland (left) and Eilish Cleary (right)
Dissent crushed to protect New Brunswick's glyphosate addiction

Wildlife biologist Rod Cumberland has been fired from the Maritime College of Forest Technology (MCFT) in New Brunswick, Canada.

A June 20 letter from the college lists several reasons for his dismissal. But the college's former director, Gerald Redmond, says the real reason is Cumberland's critical stance towards the use of glyphosate in forestry. "There is no other explanation," Redmond told the National Observer.

Arrow Down

Devastation, outrage after Israeli forces destroy Palestinian homes in occupied East Jerusalem

israeli home demolition
© All That’s Left: Anti-Occupation Collective
Israeli forces demolished 10 buildings in Sur Bahir on Monday, July 22, 2019
It was the middle of the night, but the residents of the occupied East Jerusalem town of Sur Bahir were not asleep. They were waiting for, dreading, the arrival of Israeli forces to demolish their homes.

At around 2:15am on Monday, the people's worst fears came true with the sounds of military jeeps, bulldozers, and heavy machinery rolled into their neighborhood of Wadi al-Hummus, on the outskirts of Sur Bahir, right next to Israel's separation barrier.
israeli home demolition
© All That’s Left: Anti-Occupation Collective
Hundreds of Israeli forces stormed Sur Bahir on Monday morning to begin demolishing 11 buildings in the area.
Locals told Mondoweiss that more than 1,000 Israeli soldiers and government workers descended upon the area, with force, and began the process of demolishing 11 buildings in the neighborhood.

The buildings in question, containing some 70 apartments, were slated for demolition last month when the Israeli Supreme Court gave the final ruling — after a seven year legal battle between residents and the state — that the buildings were to be destroyed due to their proximity to Israel's separation barrier, citing "security concerns."

Comment: More footage of this blatant violation of international law:



The New York Times reported on the demolitions, but gives credibility to the Israeli claims that the buildings were "mostly uninhabited" and represented a "severe security threat" by providing "cover to suicide bombers and other terrorists [i.e. Palestinians]". Suicide bombings in Israel stopped years ago. As James North writes on Mondoweiss:
But Kershner's most impressive effort at whitewash comes immediately, in the 4th paragraph. Here is her tortured sentence:
The decision to proceed with the demolition underscored the legal complexities and human difficulties caused by the absence of internationally recognized boundaries and competing authorities.
This sentence is a masterpiece of deceit. Here is what Kershner should have said: "Israel illegally occupies West Bank Palestine and refuses to negotiate borders. Even though the Palestinian Authority is supposed to be in charge of the area where Israel demolished the apartment buildings, and even granted building permits there, Israel simply overrode the P.A. and tore them down."

Kershner's euphemism about "human difficulties" is also repulsive. Her article continues, "By late afternoon, the police were still barring entry to the neighborhood to all nonresidents, including reporters."

So Kershner just gave up trying to talk to eyewitnesses, confining herself to quoting a couple of Palestinians who were outside the police perimeter. Contrast that with our own Yumna Patel, whose lengthy report includes comment from the Palestinian activist Hamada Hamada: "'The soldiers were really aggressive, pushing and shoving people, firing tear gas at us, and even beating some people with the butts of their rifles.'"

Two outstanding reporters from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Amira Hass and Jack Khoury, also managed to speak to the actual Palestinian victims:
"I built this house stone by stone. It was my dream to live in this house. Now I am losing everything," said Fadi al-Wahash, 37, his voice breaking as a bulldozer destroyed his unfinished three-floor house.
Hass and Khoury reported that Israel sent 700 police and 200 soldiers to destroy the homes — figures nowhere reported in the Times. The photo accompanying Kershner's article also left out this massive assault, portraying only a bulldozer in the distance and a couple of blurry army vehicles in the foreground.

There are other documented reports that Israeli soldiers celebrated and cheered as they blew up the Palestinian homes — a fact also unmentioned in the Times.

The Haaretz article hinted at the real reason for the demolitions. There was no mention of stopping "suicide bombers." Instead, Hass and Khoury quoted a left-wing Israeli activist who charged that the demolitions were part of Israel's "demographic war" against East Jerusalem, the ongoing effort to squeeze Palestinians out of the city entirely.



Bullseye

'Utter nonsense': Corbyn smeared as anti-Semite because he opposes 'horrendous Israeli policies'

Jeremy Corbyn
© Reuters / Toby Melville
Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn
Accusations of anti-Semitism leveled against Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn are absurd and serve as a means to intimidate and silence critics of Israel, Dr. Gabor Mate told RT.

Mate, a renowned physician, author and public speaker, expressed bafflement over claims that Corbyn is prejudiced against Jews.

"It's utter nonsense, and if I was speaking to any fellow Jews of mine who make those claims, I would say to them: Don't be ridiculous," he told Afshin Rattansi on RT's Going Underground.

According to Mate, smearing Corbyn as an anti-Semite is "simply a way to intimidate and silence critics of horrendous Israeli policies."

Watch the full interview below.


Eye 1

Registered sex offender and disgraced ex-Congressman Weiner moves back in with his wife Huma Abedin and 7-year-old son

Anthony Weiner

Anthony Weiner moving his things
Anthony Weiner has been a free man for a few months now, ever since he left a Bronx halfway house, and now it appears he's moving back in with his wife, Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin, and their seven-year-old son Jordan.

The Daily Mail reported that the 54-year-old ex-Congressman and former mayoral candidate was seen rolling boxes and designer garment bags into Abedin's home over the weekend. Weiner has never lived in the lower Manhattan apartment where Huma moved with their seven-year-old son Jordan soon after the disgraced politician went to prison. Abedin had filed for divorce, but has since withdrawn her petition, after the two parties decided to settle the issue privately. Abedin initially filed for divorce on the day Weiner entered his guilty plea for sexting a 15-year-old girl.

Marijuana

It's now law: Hawaii decriminalizes marijuana possession and expunges some criminal records

HONOLULU, Hawaii
Earlier this month, a bill to decriminalize marijuana possession and expunge the records of certain marijuana offenders became law without the governor's signature. The new law takes another step toward nullifying federal cannabis prohibition in effect in the state.

Twenty Democratic representatives sponsored House Bill 1383 (HB1383). The new law decriminalizes possession of three grams or less of marijuana making it similar to a traffic violation punishable by a fine of $130. The bill also creates a process allowing individuals convicted of possession of three grams of marijuana or less to have those convictions expunged from their criminal records. Finally, HB1383 establishes a marijuana evaluation task force to make recommendations on changing marijuana use penalties and outcomes in the state.

The House passed HB1383 by a 35-16 vote. The Senate approved the measure 22-3. Gov. David Ige didn't sign or veto the bill within his allotted timeframe and it became law on July 10 without his signature. It will go into effect Jan. 1, 2020.

Enactment of HB1383 not only loosens marijuana laws and will help those with some prior marijuana convictions on their record get a new start; it will also further undermine federal marijuana prohibition. As marijuana becomes more accepted and more states simply ignore the feds, the federal government is less able to enforce its unconstitutional laws.

Cross

Syrian town where Christians and Muslims once lived side-by-side is now being rebuilt in region previously infested with terrorists

Maaloula Syria

Before the Syrian war, Greek Orthodox and Melkite Greek Catholic Christians and Muslims lived side-by-side in the town, with the area home to ancient monasteries and an ancient mosque.
In 2013, when al-Qaeda linked jihadist militants captured the predominantly Christian town of Maaloula, Syria, scores of its residents were murdered, with others forced to flee, turning the mountainous community into a ghost town.

The Syrian Arab News Agency has released a report about the effort to restore the square in the town of Maaloula, with workers seen laying paving bricks in the city center among the partially ruined buildings.

The town, situated about 50 km northeast of Damascus, is one of only three remaining villages in the world where the Western Neo-Aramaic language is spoken. Aramaic was known to be the language of Jesus.


Comment:


People 2

Divorce is destroying the finances of Americans over 50

bride groom money
© Getty Images
In one sense, Amazon.com Inc. founder Jeff Bezos and his ex-wife, MacKenzie Bezos, are nothing special.

By finalizing their divorce this month, they join the millions of Americans now splitting up in middle age. The rate of divorce after age 50 has doubled in the U.S. since 1990.

The billionaire exes are unique, though, in escaping divorce with their finances relatively unscathed. He's still the world's richest person, worth $123.1 billion, and she has a $39.7 billion fortune, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Amazon shares climbed 19% since they announced the end of their 25-year marriage in January.

Comment: See also:


Arrow Down

Jeffrey Epstein pitched a new narrative. These sites published it

Jeffrey Epstein
© Rick Friedman/Getty Images
Jeffrey Epstein in 2004, four years before his plea deal in Florida that has been widely criticized.
After Jeffrey Epstein got out of the Palm Beach County jail in 2009, having served 13 months of an 18-month sentence resulting from a plea deal that has been widely criticized, he began a media campaign to remake his public image.

The effort led to the publication of articles describing him as a selfless and forward-thinking philanthropist with an interest in science on websites like Forbes, National Review and HuffPost.

The Forbes.com article, posted in 2013, praised him as "one of the largest backers of cutting-edge science around the world" while making no mention of his criminal past. The National Review piece, from the same year, called him "a smart businessman" with a "passion for cutting-edge science." The HuffPost article, from 2017, credited Mr. Epstein for "taking action to help a number of scientists thrive during the 'Trump Era'," a time of "anti-science policies and budget cuts."

Comment: Now that Epstein has been thrown to the wolves, it seems publications are furiously working to scrub their old content showing him in a positive light. The only reasonable response for a true news site would be to do what The Next Web did - add an editorial note that points out the oversight. But instead these news sites try to change history in a desperate attempt to disassociate themselves from the pervert, as if the simple click of a button can erase the past.

See also:


People

Rugged individualism won't save us, but enlightened collectivism can

school of fish
Individualism cannot save humanity from the crises it faces. It's not the right tool.

There is a widespread belief that if we just eliminated all collectivist impulses within our society, we could eliminate all our problems. That the government which causes so much bloodshed and oppression wouldn't be harmful if we can shrink it down to a minor role, or even to nonexistence, and the corporate powers which attach themselves to governments would thereby lose power over individuals. Let individuals take care of themselves however they see fit, with no collectivist power interfering in their affairs, and the world will sort itself out in a harmonious way.

This will never happen.

The most common argument for why this will never happen is that the world is full of awful people, and if you place the will of the individual over the will of the collective, the awful people will be able to do a lot more awful things. The people who are sociopathic enough to destroy the environment and exploit others for profit will be able to exert more influence over the total wellbeing of the world than those who aren't, and there'll be no safety nets in place protecting those who are born into under-privileged situations. Individuals like mothers who aren't as capable of earning money would frequently find themselves dependent on the kindness of a man who may or may not be kind. Such a society would claim to be just, since it makes the same demands of everybody, but due to real circumstances could only ever be gravely unjust.

This argument is of course true, but it's not the primary reason that individualism cannot save us.

Family

APA advocates 'nonjudgmental posture' to nonmonogamy

nonmonogamy
© SrdjanPav/Getty Images
According to the American Psychological Association, open marriages are the tolerant approach to intimacy.
Just when you think you've heard it all, the American Psychological Association decides this: Monogamy is the new bigotry.

That's right. According to the supposed "mental health experts," open marriages are the tolerant approach to intimacy. And they've launched a task force to prove it to the world.

According to the APA's official description of this initiative, "Finding love and/or sexual intimacy is a central part of most people's life experience. However, the ability to engage in desired intimacy without social and medical stigmatization is not a liberty for all."

Comment: The APA went off the rails long ago, as noted recently by their push for the ideological leftist position on 'toxic masculinity'. Now they're fighting for the rights of swingers (and since when are swingers an oppressed group?). They don't realize that they're playing to the views of a vocal minority and that they're coming across to the rest of us as clowns.

See also: