Welcome to Sott.net
Mon, 27 Sep 2021
The World for People who Think

Society's Child
Map

Syringe

Moderna coronavirus vaccine authorised for 12 to 17-year-olds in the UK

Kevin Mckeon, 14, Covid-19 vaccination
© Damien Storan
Kevin Mckeon, 14, receives his first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine.
The Department of Health has asked the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation for a formal recommendation

The Moderna coronavirus vaccine has been authorised for people in the UK aged between 12 and 17, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said.

The regulator said it is up to the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation to advise the Government on whether children in this age group should be given the Moderna jab.

Dr June Raine, MHRA chief executive, said:
"I am pleased to confirm that that the Covid-19 vaccine made by Moderna has now been authorised in 12 to 17-year-olds. The vaccine is safe and effective in this age group.

"We have in place a comprehensive safety surveillance strategy for monitoring the safety of all UK-approved Covid-19 vaccines and this surveillance will include the 12 to 17-year age group.

"It is for the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) to advise on whether this age group should be vaccinated with the Covid-19 vaccine made by Moderna as part of the deployment programme."

Comment: Claim that the Moderna vaccine is safe and the decision to give this vaccine to children is terrifying. All information that we have so far, points that the mRNA vaccines are far more dangerous than the virus itself, and can cause very serious side effects and even death.

20% of Moderna's human test subjects sustained severe injuries from their mRNA vaccine. It is another lie when they claim the vaccine is safe to be used in children. There is no real scientific data to back up their claim.

See also:


2 + 2 = 4

GOP flips Connecticut state senate seat in district Biden won by 25 points

ryan fazio
© Fazio For State Senate
In what could be an indicator of things to come in the 2022 mid-term election, the GOP flipped a state senate seat in a Connecticut special election on Tuesday night - the first flip for either party in 2021.

The Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC) announced in an email:
State Republicans tonight delivered the first flip of a state legislative seat in a special election by either party in 2021, as Republican Ryan Fazio defeated liberal Democrat Alex Gevanter in Connecticut's state Senate District 36 - a district Joe Biden won by more than 25% in 2020.
RSLC President Dee Duncan hailed the moment as a sign that the "people of Connecticut are sick and tired" of the Democratic Party's radical agenda:
After holding the line in two Biden-won districts in New England early this year, our momentum continues tonight with the first successful flip of the 2021-2022 election cycle. Congratulations to Ryan Fazio on running a strong campaign. His victory demonstrates that the people of Connecticut are sick and tired of the radical tax and spend agenda coming from Democrats in Hartford and in Washington, D.C. They're looking for common-sense leaders who will champion conservative policies that will revive the economy, create jobs, reduce regulations, lower taxes, and keep families safe.

With Democrats controlling Washington, it's more important than ever that we have strong Republican leadership in the states. Tonight's result is further evidence that Republicans are on offense this cycle, and the RSLC has no intention of slowing down when it comes to winning the tough fights ahead of us. The RSLC will continue to support state Republicans to ensure wins like this so that we can grow the future of our party and stop socialism from spreading to the states.
To illustrate the significance of tonight's victory, the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC) told its supporters in a fundraising email that a loss in Connecticut's state Senate District 36 would put all of the committee's 2018 gains in jeopardy.

Map

Georgia board to review Fulton elections, takeover possible

Georgia voting
© smartboy10/Getty Images/KJN
Georgia's State Election Board on Wednesday took a step toward a possible eventual takeover of elections in the state's most populous county under a process outlined in the state's sweeping new voting law that critics argue could open elections up to political interference.

The board voted unanimously Wednesday to approve a bipartisan, three-person review panel to investigate the handling of elections in Fulton County, a Democratic bastion that includes most of the city of Atlanta.

The county has long been a target for Republicans. Their attacks increased after former President Donald Trump baselessly claimed that fraud in the county contributed to his narrow loss in the state. An independent monitor appointed as part of a consent order between the county and the State Election Board found no evidence of fraud or malfeasance.


Comment: "Baselessly." If you keep repeating it, it becomes true. That's the magic of media. Fulton was rife with fraud.


GOP lawmakers last month asked the state board to appoint the performance review panel, initiating the process that could allow the Republican-controlled state board to replace the county's board of registration and elections with an administrator it chooses.

Fulton County accounts for about 11% of the state's electorate and President Joe Biden won nearly 73% of votes cast there in the November election. The county is about 45.5% white, 44.5% Black and about 7.6% people of Asian descent, according to U.S. Census data.

The review panel approved by the state board includes: Stephen Day, a Democratic appointee to the Gwinnett County election board; Ricky Kittle, a Republican appointee to the Catoosa County election board; and Ryan Germany, general counsel for the secretary of state's office.

Burka

Stephen Colbert likening Capitol Hill protesters to Taliban is not just a dumb joke, but demonization of fellow Americans

taliban
© REUTERS/Stringer; REUTERS/Stephanie Keith
Taliban fighters in Kabul (left) and January 6 riot at the US Capitol (right)
Comedian Stephen Colbert comparing the Taliban to January 6 Capitol rioters may seem silly and dumb, but when he's joined by a chorus of Democrat activists, it becomes clear they're really saying the quiet part out loud.

"Why should our soldiers be fighting radicals in a civil war in Afghanistan? We've got our own on Capitol Hill," Colbert said during his show on Monday night, showing the photos of the January riot that Democrats like him insist was an "insurrection" against Our Democracy.


While the line got a laugh from the studio audience in New York, it was not really a joke - but a way to amplify the talking points put forth by Washington. After a weekend of watching in stunned silence as the US-backed Afghan government collapsed even before Western troops, diplomats and NGO staff could leave the country - resulting in harrowing images of stampedes at the Kabul airport - President Joe Biden returned to DC on Monday and tried to change the narrative.

Instead of addressing the downfall and the way it caught the US unprepared, Biden talked about the merits of leaving - a straw man issue, since the overwhelming majority of Americans actually agree. The ones that don't are the neocon hawks like Bill Kristol, the Cheney-Kinzinger 'Republicans' and the Lincoln Project types, all of whom backed Biden in 2020.

Taking credit for ending the war and arguing US troops shouldn't be fighting a civil war in Afghanistan, Biden left without taking questions from the media. His mission was accomplished: he had served up a new narrative to fill the void created by the Taliban's reality bomb.

That certainly appears to be the context for the first half of Colbert's "joke." As for the second, it caught the attention of journalist Glenn Greenwald, who warned back in January that Washington was itching to turn the powers of the national security state against domestic political opponents.

Comment: Fanatical ideological group that wants to control all aspects of personal life according to said ideology. Sounds like a certain group of people in the U.S., but it sure ain't the the Jan. 6 "insurrectionists." Colbert would do better to look towards the "austere scholars" of social justice.


Stock Down

"Major food shortages in the UK": Business owner warns of 'profound supply disruption' as 50 Nando's restaurants close

nando's

Nando's was founded in South Africa and now runs more than 400 sites across the UK
NANDO'S restaurants across the UK have been forced to close amid a lack of food and a shortage of deliveries.

The chicken chain, known for its Portuguese-inspired Peri-Peri flavours despite having been founded in South Africa, said the problems were a result of "disruption" across the UK supply chain.

On social media, the company described the supply issues as a "bit of a 'mare" and asked customers to remain patient.

It also said that it would be sending 70 of its staff to help to sort the supply issues more rapidly.

Comment: Last year brutal, rolling, lockdowns caused vast amounts of produce of all kinds to be dumped and left to rot because it couldn't be harvested, processed, delivered, and it couldn't be sold because various food outlets were locked down. This man-made and totally avoidable food supply catastrophe also meant that preserved foods were not processed and stored, and farmers were left with huge losses, causing many to go out of business, or at least to drastically cut back this year. In addition, there's years worth of crop failures and animal culls, and more recently port closures and various other transport issues due to continued lockdowns, but also cyberattack and extreme weather phenomena.


Attention

I'll likely only see my family on a screen from now on, because I don't want the Covid jab. What happened to 'my body, my choice'?

Justin Trudeau
© Alberto Pezzali / POOL / AFP
Canada's Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, wearing a face covering due to Covid-19, reacts after landing at Cornwall Airport Newquay, near Newquay, Cornwall, on June 10, 2021.
Like many people around the world, as of mid-2021, I have had to come to terms with the sordid likelihood that the only way I will ever see my family again is online.

My country, Canada, has chosen to implement increasingly draconian and frankly unscientific policies in the name of 'protecting' people. What Canadian authorities are really doing is ensuring an uptake of the experimental jabs. Don't want to take them? No worries, but you're not welcome in Canada.

Recently, my RT colleague, Rachel Marsden, described her anguish at being forced to turn away from her country and family because Canada has decided it is the 'science police' and has decided which 'science' matters.

She wrote, "I committed the apparent violation of trying to re-enter my own country with proof of naturally acquired Covid-19 antibodies made by my own immune system post-recovery rather than those generated by the manmade Covid-19 vaccine about which much is still to be learned." She noted that even her doctor had advised her against vaccination. But, for Canada, that is apparently irrelevant.

Burka

Kabul residents slow to venture back to work amid gun-toting Taliban

Kabul taliban
© REUTERS/Stringer
A member of Taliban forces keeps watch at a checkpost in Kabul, Afghanistan August 17, 2021.
Some Kabul residents cautiously ventured back to work through quiet streets on Tuesday, fearful after a night broken by the sound of gunfire and facing questions from their new Taliban rulers stationed at checkpoints across the Afghan capital.

The Islamist Taliban, who stopped women from working and administered punishments including public stoning during their previous 1996-2001 rule, swept the country in days as U.S.-backed government forces melted away.

While the Taliban have pledged there will be no retribution against opponents and promised to respect the rights of women, minorities and foreigners, many Afghans are sceptical.

But they also know life must go on.

Bulb

Battle for the soul: Russia to spend over $130 million on making 'spiritual and moral' content for internet-loving youngsters

teens phones internet
© Getty Images / Maskot
Concerned Russian government officials have announced they will invest billions of rubles in winning over young people with righteous, wholesome content online. A new fund is being made available to back the saintly project.

Moscow's federal treasury revealed on Tuesday that an extra seven billion rubles will be handed over to the Institute for the Development of the Internet by the end of the year, taking its funding to a total of 10 billion rubles (over $135 million).

That cash, the authorities say, will be used to bankroll "the production of state-backed content, including material aimed at the formation of civic identity and spiritual and moral values among young people." The institute has described its mission as acting as an interface between the government and internet giants, and shaping the formation of the online world in Russia.

Info

'Prepare for the worst': Like Bin Laden, Taliban is another 'American project' & 'US scam against Muslims' - Chechnya's Kadyrov

Ramzan Kadyrov
© Sputnik / Said Tsarnaev
FILE PHOTO.
The capture of Afghanistan by the Taliban is "another American scam against Muslims." That's according to Ramzan Kadyrov, the leader of Russia's Chechnya region, who suggested that the terrorist group is controlled by Washington.

Speaking on a video posted by one of his sons, Adam, Kadyrov urged everyone to be on guard.

"America has come up with another scam against Muslims. They said they would never get out of [Afghanistan], and now they've abandoned everyone and run away," Kadyrov said. "Imagine, for decades, people have been dying there. Five years ago, there were already more than two million civilians killed!"

According to the Chechen leader, the Taliban is an American project and is not to be trusted. He compared the group to Bin Laden, the former leader of Al-Qaeda, who Washington funded in the war against the Soviet Union in the 1980s.

Evil Rays

Plymouth shootings: Police reviewing decision not to declare terror attack as incel link probed

Jake Davison

Jake Davison named as Plymouth shooter
Police are reviewing the decision not to label the Plymouth shootings a terror attack as investigators probe the gunman's interest in the "incel" movement.

Devon and Cornwall Police said the initial decision that Jake Davison's killings were not a terrorist incident was made by the National Counter Terrorism Policing Network following a referral from local officers.

"The status of this will be kept under continual review, and a further referral made should new information come to light," a spokesperson added.

"We are aware of Davison's interest and engagement with the incel movement and his use of various online platforms, and this forms a key strand within the ongoing police investigation."

British law defines terrorism as violence that is designed to influence the government or public in order to advance a "political, religious, racial or ideological cause".

Security agencies are discussing whether to include violence undertaken by supporters of the incel movement - a misogynistic online subculture of people who label themselves "involuntary celibates" - in the definition.