
Ronan Farrow attends the 2020 Vanity Fair Oscar Party at Wallis Annenberg Center in Beverly Hills, California. February 09, 2020
Mia Farrow and Woody Allen's (almost equally) famous son found himself trending on Twitter on Monday following the hullabaloo surrounding the attempted character assassination of him in the New York Times with their headline, 'Is Ronan Farrow Too Good To Be True?' I'm just surprised the so-called 'newspaper of record' went with an interrogation point in their headline, because it felt like a rhetorical question to me.
It's preposterous how this media celebrity is often hailed as "arguably the most famous investigative reporter in America" as a result his #MeToo reporting, because - sorry - when it comes to his journalism, he appears to be nothing more than a one-trick pony.














Comment: Taken together with this recent article it seems that the New York Times is attempting to dial back some of the vehemence created by the "Believe All Women" and the MeToo movement. Surely it's just pure coincidence that those things which were ignored or trampled upon - such as journalistic integrity, facts, due process, and so forth - when the accused was Trump and Kavanaugh are important now that the accused is their favorite candidate for the presidency.
RT covered some of the response to Matt Lauer's article about the dubious journalistic integrity of Ronan Farrow here: