Society's Child
Agents from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE) asked local law enforcement to use plate reading technology to record information on vehicles attending the gun show in Del Mar back in 2010.
Data was then cross checked with information on vehicles which crossed the Mexican border, around 37 miles south of Del Mar, in the hope of finding gun smugglers, according to the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).
ICE confirmed to WSJ that the activity took place and resulted in no investigations or arrests. The annual gun show at Del Mar, which attracts 9,000 people, is the only show where it was planned to take place, according to the emails seen by the WSJ.
Between September 13th and 23rd, Fancy Bear released five batches of samples from the World Anti-Doping Agency database. The information on 107 athletes who tested positive for banned substances, was posted on the internet. However, for some reason, often medical, WADA allowed these athletes to take part in the competitions.
Most "sick" athletes are US or UK citizens - 23% and 22% correspondingly. They are followed by Canada (10%), Germany (8%), Australia (7%), Denmark (6%), Italy (5%) - 23 countries in total.
Twenty-nine sports are mentioned in the published data. The most often cited are swimming (19%), rowing (10%), track cycling (8%), field hockey (7%), tennis (6%), football (5%), athletics (5%) and mountain biking (4%).
Comment: Yesterday the hacker group Fancy Bears released even more names of athletes who tested positive for banned substances by WADA but were permitted to participate in the Olympics because of the "therapeutic use" exemption. The athletes given an exemption are primarily from Western countries: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Germany, France, Great Britain, Japan, New Zealand, Sweden, Venezuela, South Africa and of course the USA. Rio 2016 Gold medal rower Mahe Drysdale of New Zealand is among those listed as testing positive for banned substances. It should be fairly clear at this point that the banning of Russian athletes at the Rio 2016 Olympics is a complete joke and had nothing to do with doping since everyone is doing it. The Russian ban was not about doping, but about the US propaganda effort to demonize Russia in any way possible.
See also:
- Western cheats: Author of WADA report on Russia admits 'therapeutic use exemptions' prone to abuse
- 'Fancy Bears' release more athletes' names in WADA hack
- Bombshell leak reveals Williams tennis sisters and Rio Olympics gymnast heroine have been doping for years, with WADA's approval
- The white-washed WADA report on Russian doping will make you laugh through your tears
- Cultural warfare: US attempt to ban Russia from Olympics for 'cheating' is rank hypocrisy
- SOTT News Snapshot: September 15 edition - Everything you need to know about American doping
- More WADA leaks: British Olympic champion Mo Farah, Spanish tennis star Rafael were given 'exemptions' to take performance-enhancing drugs
Just last week, western media was praising the Colombian peace agreement. Four years of negotiations in Cuba, commentators noted, had finally put an end to a 50-year conflict between the government and the left-wing rebel movement Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), and involving various right-wing paramilitary groups and narco cartels that had claimed an estimated 200,000 lives, and displaced five million people.
The negotiators had hammered out a 300-page document, and on September 26, Colombian officials and FARC representatives signed an accord in Cartagena, in front of foreign dignitaries including UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and US Secretary of State John Kerry.
When Colombia's President Juan Manuel Santos and Rodrigo Londono, the leader of the FARC, shook hands, jets flew overhead trailing smoke in the yellow, blue and red of the Colombian flag. The upcoming referendum on the accord, pollsters predicted, would be a resounding "Yes".
Peace process in limbo
And yet on Sunday the pact was rejected - 50.21 percent to 49.78 percent, a difference of 53,894 votes - in a referendum that has thrown the peace process into limbo.
The result while shocking, is not inexplicable. The vote was largely a result of domestic politics.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) tested 97 pork products sold at the supermarkets and found three were contaminated with MRSA CC398 - a potentially deadly bacteria which can cause serious health problems.
The bug is less harmful to humans than the MRSA bug that kills about 300 people in hospitals in England and Wales each year, but is known to be responsible for at least six deaths in Denmark.
In Denmark, the MRSA CC398 is viewed as a public health crisis. Appearing over a decade ago, it now affects about two-thirds of pig farms, with 12,000 people believed to have contracted it.
Current regulations in British import regulations leave an "open door"for MRSA CC398-infected live pigs to arrive from places like Denmark, according to the Guardian.
The bug can be contracted from infected meat and animals, with workers on pig farms able to catch the disease and pass it on to other people. It can cause chronic infections and seriously harm people with compromised immune systems.
Comment: The rise in sales of critically important antibiotics is happening despite the fact it is now known that resistant forms of certain food poisoning illnesses, including campylobacter, and some variations of the superbug MRSA, are directly linked to antibiotic use on farms.
See also: Big Pharma's industrial waste is fueling the rise in superbugs worldwide
The incident began on June 7, 2016, when Campbell was stopped because Mack claimed his wife's new minivan's temporary license plate wasn't visible through the back glass.
Comment: A bit melodramatic? Perhaps, but how would the same events be reported if conducted by someone not in uniform?
'He was a patriot and the CIA turned on him': Poor medical care endangers Jeffrey Sterling in prison
Prison officials have been reluctant to provide CIA whistleblower Jeffrey Sterling with the necessary medical care. After a monthlong battle to allow him to see a cardiac specialist, the little treatment he has received is about to end.
It took an uphill battle against the Englewood Correctional Facility in Colorado for Jeffrey Sterling to receive outside medical treatment for a heart issue that he had before he arrived in the prison. But even after receiving it, he may have to keep fighting against the correctional facility that is responsible for keeping him alive.
Sterling is serving a three-and-a-half-year sentence after being found guilty under the Espionage Act in 2015. While incarcerated at the Englewood Correctional Facility in Colorado, he began experiencing heart issues that he described as feeling similar to atrial fibrillation (afib), a condition that left him hospitalized for four days in the past.
Terrence Sterling was an unarmed black motorist shot by a police officer who did not turn on his bodycam until after the shooting. The lack of footage has left many frustrated and protesters have taken to Washington DC's streets to demand accountability from the police.
Over 200 protesters have shut down several streets in Washington. They began their protests at 3rd and M Street where Sterling was killed on September 11. Plans to protest on Monday were announced by DC Black Lives Matter on their Twitter page.
The demonstrators are demanding that Officer Brian Trainer, 27, be arrested and held accountable for the death of Terrence Sterling. So far, no arrests have been reported and the protests have remained peaceful and concentrated in downtown DC.
"When you talk about the mental health problems, when people come back from war and combat, they see things that maybe a lot of folks in this room have seen many times over. And you're strong and you can handle it, but a lot of people can't handle it," the five-time Vietnam draft deferrer Donald Trump told an audience of military veterans at an event in northern Virginia on Monday. "And they see horror stories, they see events that you couldn't see in a movie - nobody would believe it."
Those remarks started a volley of tweets.
The announcement of the vote has created a sense of confusion; how Colombia could have rejected a deal that would have put an end to the 52-year conflict? The numbers show the 'no' campaign winning by the slimmest of margins, with only a small percentage separating the two sides.[ii]
Four years of negotiations appeared to have culminated on August 24 with the announcement of the peace deal. At a public ceremony in Cuba, Humberto de la Calle, head of the Colombian delegation, and Ivan Marquez, chief FARC negotiator, signed the historic agreement. On September 26, the accord was once again signed, this time in Cartagena by President Juan Manuel Santos and FARC commander Timochenko as crowds looked onward and the streets of Colombia broke into celebrations. Throughout the entire process both President Santos and ex-president Uribe led fierce campaigns for and against the agreement respectively. Santos begged Colombians to be rational and see the bigger picture, whereas Uribe, playing to the hearts of the people, urged voters to not simply forgive and forget. Opinion polls taken during the weeks building up to the referendum continuously predicted a "yes" landslide, with a comfortable 66% called just before the election.[iii] President Santos, who has staked his political career on this peace process, believed that his campaign would soon claim victory and peace could finally fall over Colombia.
I am not black. But like you, I am not white.
I do not have the history of slavery you carry like a weight on your back from the day you are born. My ancestors weren't shipped in chains from Africa to the Americas through the Atlantic to work under slave owners. But in 1948, Zionist militias did drive them out of their homes to refugee camps in an infamous event called the Nakba, obliterating many of our villages and towns.
My parents didn't have to protest in the streets to end segregation and institutional discrimination by their own government to win the right to enjoy their most basic civil rights, a remarkable series of events that I teach to my own students here in Gaza. However, they have been labelled "stateless" by the international community, driving them to protest through boycotts, demonstrations and even hunger strikes, introducing the word intifada (shake-off) into our political dictionary.
Police officers from my own government neither pull me over for "driving-while-black," nor stop and frisk me. They do not shoot at me, kill me while unarmed and get away with it. However, I was born under the boot of an oppressor that has controlled almost every minute of my life: the Israeli occupation forces.
















Comment: The U.S. government is watching every move citizens make, so this shouldn't come as any big surprise.