Society's Child
Pending a successful appeal, Gregory Salcido, a Pico Rivera City council member and teacher, will not be allowed to return to his position at the school. It comes after the California school board voted unanimously on Tuesday to oust Salcido for comments he made to students about the US military last January, reports the Los Angeles Times.
In a secretly-recorded video on January 26, Salcido reportedly described US military personnel as the "lowest of our low" in terms of intelligence. He also joked about previous military campaigns and the US armed forces' inability to "beat the Vietnamese" during the infamous land war in Asia.
The group found that Trump's 25 percent tariff on steel imports and 10 percent tariff on aluminum will add roughly 19,000 jobs, offsetting potential jobs losses from other sectors of the economy.
The organization found that the tariff would decrease the economy by roughly $1.4 billion, or one percent of American gross domestic product (GDP).

The South Africa of Mandela is over, and the country is increasingly signaling that it will decline into Zimbabwe version 2.0
When the late anti-Apartheid activist Nelson Mandela emerged from prison and became South Africa's first black president, he carefully steered the country away from the radicalism of the African National Congress's Marxist past and toward a policy which embraced moderation and responsibility in international affairs. Rather than precipitate conflict, he sought to mediate and resolve. South Africa gained widespread respect as a country embracing peace and looking toward the future rather than catalyzing the radical causes which have sown conflict around the continent and wider world.Alas, Mandela was unable to make his changes permanent. After his five-year presidential term ended in 1999, and especially after his 2013 death, the leaders who followed Mandela-Thabo Mbeki, and especially Jacob Zuma and now Cyril Ramaphosa - have spent South Africa's moral capital shilling for increasingly radical regimes, terrorist groups, and causes.
In December 2017, for example, the ANC both downgraded its embassy in Israel and invited representatives of Hamas to its party conference. While the Palestinian Authority exist because it in theory foreswore terrorism and recognized Israel's right to exist, Hamas opposes the two-state solution and seeks not only the eradication of Israel, but also genocide against Jews. South Africa has also proven itself a central location for the acquisition and smuggling of sensitive technology to Hezbollah, another terror group. Students affiliated with the ANC's student union at the University of Witwatersrand praised Hitler and waved Hezbollah flags. Bilateral ties between South Africa and Iran are at an all-time high and Iran has recruited Palestinians in South Africa in order to conduct terrorism against Israel.
In their report, the Guardian noted that "hundreds of millions of Facebook users are likely to have had their private information harvested by companies that exploited the same terms as the firm that collected data and passed it on to Cambridge Analytica."
"My concerns were that all of the data that left Facebook servers to developers could not be monitored by Facebook, so we had no idea what developers were doing with the data," claimed Parakilas. "It has been painful watching... Because I know that they could have prevented it."
"Once the data left Facebook servers there was not any control, and there was no insight into what was going on," he continued, adding, "Facebook was in a stronger legal position if it didn't know about the abuse that was happening."
Let's begin with one particularly absurd accusation of "whataboutism" promoted by NPR last year:
When O'Reilly countered that "Putin is a killer," Trump responded, "There are a lot of killers. You got a lot of killers. What, you think our country is so innocent?"
This particular brand of changing the subject is called "whataboutism" - a simple rhetorical tactic heavily used by the Soviet Union and, later, Russia. And its use in Russia helps illustrate how it could be such a useful tool now, in America. As Russian political experts told NPR, it's an attractive tactic for populists in particular, allowing them to be vague but appear straight-talking at the same time.
The idea behind whataboutism is simple: Party A accuses Party B of doing something bad. Party B responds by changing the subject and pointing out one of Party A's faults - "Yeah? Well what about that bad thing you did?" (Hence the name.)
It's not exactly a complicated tactic - any grade-schooler can master the "yeah-well-you-suck-too-so-there" defense. But it came to be associated with the USSR because of the Soviet Union's heavy reliance upon whataboutism throughout the Cold War and afterward, as Russia.
Comment: Whatyathinkaboutthat?

Larry Hogan (R) while St. Mary's Sheriff Tim Cameron (R) speaks Tuesday at the Loffler Senior Center about the shooting incident at Great Mills High
As we will see, this incident, and how it unfolded, contradicts nearly all liberal logic regarding the problem of school shootings in general. Thus it is reasonable to conclude that we won't be bombarded with weeks of media coverage. For this reason it seems important to analyze the situation both for the challenges it poses to the official liberal narrative, and for the deeper tragedy that it represents in American culture:
A) The weapon Rollins used was subject to Maryland's strict gun control laws
B) An armed school resource officer ended the confrontation before it had the potential to escalate into a mass shooting
C) The liberal response to school shootings is as bad as, if not worse than, the shootings themselves - for reasons we will explore below.
But first, the official version of events as they unfolded on Tuesday, March 20th, 2018.
The red ink is original.
Now it is true that, when I was sacked as Ambassador by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for blowing the whistle on extraordinary rendition and the Blair government's misuse of intelligence from torture, I went into a terrible depression and voluntarily spent ten days or so in St Thomas Hospital (not a mental illness facility) for treatment. I have never tried to keep this secret, indeed it is a major part of my memoir "Murder in Samarkand". It is also true, as I have always acknowledged, that I have had other less serious depressive episodes treated at home and been diagnosed as bipolar since I was 20.
That we stigmatise anybody who has ever had a mental illness, write them off and view their views, on anything, as invalid, is an attitude I had hoped we had moved past last century. Indeed, if this hatchet job was done on anybody writing within the Overton window, then the Guardian would be dedicating editorials to condemning it. We have in fact moved to the old Soviet position, where disagreement with the official line equals mental illness. I quite confess this sort of thing does in fact hurt me - if you cut me, do I not bleed?
Comment: Murray isn't the only dissenting independent journalist to be under vicious attack either. See what Caitlin Johnstone has had to contend with recently: This job of truth-telling sucks sometimes
During the Spiegel TV interview with the Syrian, he only granted his wives permission to speak after a while. The women barely had a say in the report. It seems that the only thing they were allowed to say was to express their satisfaction with their promised fate.
Ahmad, an illiterate, and his wives are also satisfied with the apartment financed by the German taxpayer. In the single bedroom - so we learn - the three do not sleep together, but in succession. Being a second wife is obviously a shift worker job.
Ahmad wishes for four wives and 10 to 20 children and would eventually need a larger flat. His third future wife still lives in Syria. For the fourth wedding, the illiterate imagines wedding a German woman, provided she is a Muslim. She may even be only 13, as was the case with one of his current wives.
Comment: Right but he wouldn't face 'certain death' in Syria, so that's not the real reason this politician wouldn't send him home.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday sold more than 77 million acres of federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico for offshore oil drilling, an area twice the size of Florida. The lease sale forms part of the Trump administration's plans to increase domestic energy production by opening up new areas for oil drilling.
Oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico became increasingly controversial after the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010, which killed 11 workers and released millions of barrels of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico. The catastrophe caused $17.2 billion-worth of damage to natural resources, according to a study in 2017 commissioned by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Critics of the sale fear the expansion in offshore drilling could devastate marine life and lead to roll-backs in environmental protections. "Trump is selling off our oceans and selling out coastal communities and marine life to the oil industry," said Kristen Monsell, oceans program legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity.
Comment: While Trump's efforts at revitalizing the US economy and energy sector are laudable, this particular effort does seem horribly short-sighted considering the number of devastating oil spill disasters we have seen in the past few decades by criminally negligent oil companies.
We still haven't seen all the effects that the Deepwater Horizon disaster is continuing to have on the oceans, but here are some:
- Judge rules BP's reckless conduct and gross negligence were responsible for Deepwater Horizon oil spill
- Significant portion of Deepwater Horizon oil transported to sea floor via marine snow
- Deepwater Horizon still creating an environment of fear and intimidation five years on
- Dolphins continue to die 5 years after the Deepwater Horizon disaster
- Over a million birds died during Deepwater Horizon disaster
- Deadly Bacteria Lurk in Deepwater Horizon Tar Balls
- Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Contaminated Ocean's Food Chain, Study Finds
- No surprise: Study shows Corexit dispersant not helpful in degrading Deepwater Horizon oil slick
Florida fears deepen as oil enters the Loop Current
Facebook is facing an existential test, and its leadership is failing to address it.
Good leaders admit mistakes, apologize quickly, show up where they're needed and show their belief in the company by keeping skin in the game.
Facebook executives, in contrast, react to negative news with spin and attempts to bury it. Throughout the last year, every time bad news has broken, executives have downplayed its significance. Look at its public statements last year about how many people had seen Russian-bought election ads - first it was 10 million, then it was 126 million.
Top execs dodged Congress when it was asking questions about Russian interference. They are selling their shares at a record clip.
The actions of Facebook execs now recall how execs at Nokia and Blackberry reacted after the iPhone emerged. Their revenues kept growing for a couple years -- and they dismissed the threats. By the time users started leaving in droves, it was too late.
Comment: The real question is why Facebook, the pseudo-civilian, information-vacuuming darling of the surveillance world, is suddenly being attacked in the mainstream media. Who gains by weakening one of the most efficient propaganda machines in the world?
- Confirmed: Facebook's recent algorithm change is penalizing conservative sites, while boosting liberals
- Your privacy up for sale: Facebook is a surveillance company rebranded as 'social media'
- Society under surveillance: Free speech, Facebook and the NSA
- Facebook AI chief developing automated surveillance system allowing computers to spy on humans more effectively














Comment: Salicido's gripe with the military and its soldiers doesn't appear to have much do to with waging illegal wars fought for the 'dumbs**ts' in office who are blindly driven by an unhinged desire to maintain US hegemony and a need to prop up the dysfunctional welfare state. Instead he turns his ire toward kids who are manipulated into serving. There's nothing inherently wrong with military service in and of itself. But under a pathocracy everything is turned upside down serving the worst aspects of a country, and this includes the work of academics and bankers as well. That said, it is also clear that the American educational system is becoming more and more resistant to merely discussing controversial views by the day. Say something offensive, and your career is finished!