© FlickrClaire Perry
After numerous reports of
harmless sites being blocked as "inappropriate," Britain's new Internet content filters are currently best known as a nuisance. Rather than succeeding in their intended purpose of protecting children from online porn, they're managing to block hundreds of innocuous sites - including the homepage of the pro-censorship politician who campaigned for the filters to be introduced.
Almost every major ISP in the U.K. has now implemented the content filters, which act as a kind of "net nanny" service to block hardcore porn, extremist political sites, drugs, alcohol, violence and suicide-related content, and a selection of other topics deemed inappropriate for children to be viewing online.
When setting up a new Internet connection, customers are given the option of modifying or opting out of these content filters, but it still took less than 24 hours for someone to create a proxy service that allows people to
circumvent the filters if they didn't have access to their own ISP.
The so-called "porn filters" have already been criticized for blocking multiple sites containing non-pornographic sexual content, including sex education and LGBT support sites. O2, one of the top four ISPs in the U.K., has even had to amend its filters after users discovered that they were blocked from various childrens' charities, the Samaritans, and the British Library.