Nine days after the attack in the Christmas market in the French city of Strasbourg last December in which an Islamic terrorist killed five and wounded 11, a Washington think tankreported that similar attacks were likely to continue. The terrorist, Cherif Chekatt (who was killed in a subsequent shootout with police), had previously pledged allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank, declared that European citizens would face a continuing "significant threat" of similar attacks: "The threat of attacks from groups like the Islamic State and al Qaeda to ... the United Kingdom and France is at one of the highest levels [since the 9/11 attacks]," adding that the number of such attacks - foiled, failed and successful - surged more than 700 percent between 2007 and 2017.-New American
Society's Child

Psychologists treating individual boys and men for individual problems should not be basing their approach on unscientific collectivist theories.
One does not have to have read the entire 30,000 word document to appreciate its thrust: "traditional masculinity" is bad for society as well as to boys and men themselves. Stoicism, competitiveness and risk-taking, the qualities we consider desirable when they result in firefighting, search-and-rescue operations, self-sacrifice for women and children (see under Titanic) and combat in the defence of the nation, are, the APA believes, "psychologically harmful."
In a section called "masculine ideology," the APA says: "Masculine ideology is a set of descriptive, prescriptive, and proscriptive ... cognitions about boys and men (academic citations added). Although there are differences in masculinity ideologies, there is a particular constellation of standards that have held sway over large segments of the population, including: anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk and violence. These have been collectively referred to as traditional masculinity ideology." This statement seems to have been composed by someone who has to bite her or his tongue in order not to describe manly men as "deplorables."
The West is rotting!The word 'catastrophe' has several meanings, but in its original meaning in Greek the word means a "sudden downturn" (in Greek katastrophē 'overturning, sudden turn,' from kata- 'down' + strophē 'turning'). As for the word "superpower" it also has several possible definitions, but my preferred one is this one "Superpower is a term used to describe a state with a dominant position, which is characterized by its extensive ability to exert influence or project power on a global scale. This is done through the combined-means of economic, military, technological and cultural strength, as well as diplomatic and soft power influence. Traditionally, superpowers are preeminent among the great powers" this one, "an extremely powerful nation, especially one capable of influencing international events and the acts and policies of less powerful nations" or this one "an international governing body able to enforce its will upon the most powerful states".
Yes, maybe, but what a nice smell...
Old Soviet joke
I have mentioned the very visible decline of the USA and its associated Empire in many of my articles already, so I won't repeat it here other than to say that the "ability to exert influence and impose its will" is probably the best criteria to measure the magnitude of the fall of the USA since Trump came to power (the process was already started by Dubya and Obama, but it sure accelerated with The Donald). But I do want to use a metaphor to revisit the concept of catastrophe.
If you place an object in the middle of a table and then push it right to the edge, you will exert some amount of energy we can call "E1". Then, if the edge of the table is smooth and you just push the object over the edge, you exercise a much smaller amount of energy we can call "E2". And, in most cases (if the table is big enough), you will also find that E1 is much bigger than E2 yet E2, coming after E1 took place, triggered a much more dramatic event: instead of smoothly gliding over the table top, the object suddenly falls down and shatters. That sudden fall can also be called a "catastrophe". This is also something which happens in history, take the example of the Soviet Union.
Comment: The upcoming collapse, or rather the current collapse, is not just confined to the US but all the Western world. Taking a look at the signs we see this happening in various forms throughout the US and Europe. In particular, we can explicitly see the effect of social and cultural collapse in the form of the radical leftist ideology that is pervasive throughout all our social institutions; such as the APA's recent announcement as well as the disintegration of our higher educational systems. Or moves by high courts in Germany to side with Sharia law over the country's own laws or immigration policies that ultimately hurt them and their own citizens. And those are just a few of many examples.
Perhaps the only stage that hasn't yet begun in earnest is that of financial collapse - however it won't take much to tip that into full swing. Make no mistake, despite the 'normalcy' one might see in their everyday life, the ship is sinking - but you'll only notice if you've been paying attention.
See also: Post-nihilism, a template for where we are heading
A cross-party group of MPs has called on the government to appoint a Minister for Hunger to deal with "food insecurity" especially among children.
Siobhan Collingwood, head teacher of the school in Morecambe, Lancashire, said one in 10 of its pupils came from families using foodbanks.
"Unfortunately I've got the faces behind the statistics," she added.
The Environmental Audit Committee highlighted 2017 Unicef figures showing 19% of children under 15 in the UK live with adults who struggle to buy food.
Comment: Even following a damning UN report on the disastrous effects government imposed cuts have had on the UK most mainstream news outlets are distracted by the endless farce that is Brexit.
See:
- New report shows that Britain has violated every single article in the Declaration of Human Rights
- UK in crisis: Children in poverty surges by 100,000 in a year - totaling a staggering 4.1 million
- UK: Fifth of workers still earning below 'real' living wage
- Income stagnation and rising poverty: Millions of UK families earning less than 15 years ago
To the question "As you may know, President Trump ordered an immediate withdrawal of more than 2,000 U.S. troops from Syria. Based on what you know, do you support or oppose President Trump's decision?", 29 percent of Democrats responded either "Somewhat support" or "Strongly support", while 50 percent responded either "Somewhat oppose" or "Strongly oppose". Republicans asked the same question responded with 73 percent either somewhat or strongly supporting and only 17 percent either somewhat or strongly opposing.
Those surveyed were also asked the question "As you may know, President Trump ordered the start of a reduction of U.S. military presence in Afghanistan, with about half of the approximately 14,000 U.S. troops there set to begin returning home in the near future. Based on what you know, do you support or oppose President Trump's decision?" Forty percent of Democrats responded as either "Somewhat support" or "strongly support", with 41 percent either somewhat or strongly opposing. Seventy-six percent of Republicans, in contrast, responded as either somewhat or strongly supporting Trump's decision, while only 15 percent oppose it to any extent.
Comment: One has to wonder if the democrats voting in the poll would simply oppose anything Trump initiates, without actually thinking about it or the possible consequences. This would almost be even more depressing than the alternative, that they're a bloodthirsty lot who are enthusiastic empire expansionists.
See also:
- Trump Flips Terrorism Narrative to Justify US Military Withdrawal From Syria And Afghanistan
- Putin: The 'US is right to leave Syria, but no signs of pullout - remember Afghanistan'
- US-led war of terror 'officially' killed at least half a million in Afghanistan, Pakistan & Iraq - not counting Libya and Syria
- 2500+ ISIS fighters leave Syria and Iraq for Afghanistan, Russia to respond
- Bait and switch: While world watched Syria, US attempted false-flag 'attack by Russia' on Afghanistan-Tajikistan border
- Pentagon no longer publishes number of troops in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan
- Pepe Escobar: The Syria connection to Iran, Afghanistan and China
Comment: The vaccine propaganda segment (which you have to see to believe!) begins at approx 3:30.

Coca-Cola said it was working on ways to reduce the sugar and calories in its drinks around the world.
The Coca-Cola Company has shaped China's policies towards its growing obesity crisis, encouraging a focus on exercise rather than diet and thereby safeguarding its drinks sales, an academic investigation has alleged.
Susan Greenhalgh, a Harvard academic and China scholar, says Coca-Cola has exerted its influence since 1999 through a Chinese offshoot of an institute founded in the US by the then Coca-Cola vice-president Alex Malaspina with substantial company funding. The International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) has been heavily criticised in the US and Europe for promoting exercise and downplaying the need for people to cut down on excessive sugary drinks.
Comment: Coca Cola is replicating previous efforts in other markets where it has been chased out. Hopefully the Chinese government will wake up to to scam and send the company packing.
- Coca Cola funds non-profit organization to spread obesity disinformation
- CDC Official Dr. Barbara Bowman steps down after Coca-Cola ILSI scandal comes to light
- Study: How Coca-Cola declared war on the 'public health community'
- Coca-Cola & Pepsi sponsored about 100 health orgs in 5yrs, primary interest of improving profit, at the expense of public health
- Corruption of Science: Coca-Cola's Shady Record in Obesity Research - 'Dracula in Charge of the Blood Bank'
Attacks began on the 2,600 ground-based cameras when President Macron's government reduced the speed limit on country roads to 80 km/h from 90 km/h last July, but intensified in November with the start of the rural revolt named after the "gilets jaunes", the high-visibility vests that drivers carry.
For car-dependent country-dwellers, the 80 km/hour limit symbolises the "arrogance" of a Parisian president who is indifferent to their plight. The roadside boxes have been burnt, painted over, blown up, smashed or simply covered with the jackets. The state has refused to give figures but officials have privately confirmed estimates from motoring organisations that 65 per cent of them were out of action, with about 300 destroyed. In the western Vendée department, 90 per cent have been sabotaged.
Comment: While the sabotaging of speed cameras can't really be ascribed to the yellow vests (they started months before the movement was born), the same sentiment is evident - the people of France are fed up and sick of the government continuing to skim off their meager paychecks. The French are known to protest at the drop of a hat, but this situation seems different - you can only push people so far before they'll fight back.
See also:
- France is in free fall
- NewsReal #22: France's New Year's Revolution - Trump Battles War Party
- Why the US #Resistance is ignoring France's Yellow Vest protests
- Yellow Vests continue rallying across France to maintain pressure on Macron's government for eighth weekend
- Forgotten France rises up
- France discovers 'Jupiter' Macron isn't a leader but a petulant boy-king
Government researchers did not offer an explanation, but experts cited factors including changing economics and fewer teen pregnancies.
Americans are having fewer and fewer babies, a new government report finds. In fact, we now aren't making enough babies to replace ourselves.
For the population to reproduce itself at current numbers, the "total fertility rate" needs to be 2,100 births per 1,000 women of childbearing age over their lifetime, researchers for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in their report, released early Thursday. But the latest data show a current rate of just 1,765.5 per 1,000, or 16 percent below the number needed to keep the population stable without additions through immigration.
The total fertility rate has been declining steadily for seven years, but the numbers for 2017 represent the biggest drop in recent history. The rate for 2016 was 1,820.5; for 2015, 1,843.5; and for 2014, 1,862.5.
Comment: Perhaps Americans have, on a subconscious level, a certain sense of 'the inevitable end' that's coming. Any American with open eyes has to see that the current state of things can't continue and that, more than likely, very hard times lay ahead for the country (if not the world) and this subconscious nagging voice may be dissuading many from following their inborn desire to procreate. There are likely many other contributing factors, but one has to wonder if this doesn't play into the situation.
See also:
- The 'remarkable' decline in fertility rates
- Debt & childcare costs drive US fertility rate to historic low
- Germany's fertility rate hits 33-year high due to migrant inpouring
- American fertility rates are at an all time low
- Career women have flatter figures, reduced fertility
"AI will increasingly replace repetitive jobs, not just for blue-collar work, but a lot of white-collar work," says Lee. "Chauffeurs, truck drivers, anyone who does driving for a living-- their jobs will be disrupted more in the 15-25 year time frame," he tells Pelley. "Many jobs that seem a little bit complex, chef, waiter, a lot of things will become automated ... stores ... restaurants, and altogether in 15 years, that's going to displace about 40 percent of the jobs in the world." When pressed by Pelley about 40 percent of jobs being displaced, Lee says the jobs will be, "displaceable."
"I believe [AI] is going to change the world more than anything in the history of mankind. More than electricity," says Lee.













Comment: It's little surprise that the American Psychological Association is onboard with the current war on masculinity, given they were eager to collaborate with CIA on torture in the past. It seems they have no issue with authoritarian marching orders that lead to the decline of civilization. Hopefully those who legitimately want to help struggling men, like Jordan Peterson to name one, will get through to more people. The APA is only making things much much worse.
See also: