
© Daniel Greenfield/KJN
The New Attack Dog
The Ecuadorian embassy in London cut off Julian Assange's internet access in October of 2016, but the WikiLeaks Twitter account kept posting about leak drops uninterrupted. The embassy's action made headlines all across mainstream media. It is common knowledge for anyone who was paying attention to WikiLeaks during that time. The Intercept's editors are unquestionably aware of this.
They are aware of this, and yet they allowed
an article to be published about allegedly leaked Direct Messages on Twitter which continuously, pervasively and fundamentally assumes that the WikiLeaks account is controlled by Assange and Assange only. The account is referred to as "Assange" throughout the entire article.
"Throughout this article," the latest establishment effort at undermining public opinion of WikiLeaks
states,
"The Intercept assumes that the WikiLeaks account is controlled by Julian Assange himself, as is widely understood, and that he is the author of the messages, referring to himself in the third person majestic plural, as he often does."
There is no basis whatsoever for The Intercept to assume this. In addition to the obvious implications of the WikiLeaks account continuing to tweet despite Assange's lack of internet,
WikiLeaks has made repeated public statements that it is a shared staff Twitter account. There is absolutely no excuse for such a spectacular journalistic failure to be interwoven without apology throughout an entire article of a widely esteemed publication.
Even if The Intercept does end up retracting this grotesque embarrassment and extensively editing the article to reflect fact instead of fiction,
there will be no reason to believe that this was due to anything other than public outcry, and the damage is already irreparable.
Comment: These are but a few examples of the despicable treatment continuously inflicted on Palestinians by the Israelis who continually thumb their noses at international law.