"I saw a ballot for Taniqua Haynes, it comes up in the computer as the wrong ballot number. They mailed her ballot number 5748, but that's not what she sent back."

Challenges by Schnorak were ignored. "They refused to put challenges in the electronic log."

Schnorak says he was only able to get the Detroit officials to log two ballot challenges, "and I had to fight for those."

...
"If you follow the rules, there's no cheating." Schnorak described witnessing a ballot process in Royal Oak, Michigan, the previous day that had only 10 challenged ballots out of 25,755 counted.

He said that the fraud was systemic: "I kept seeing a voter birthdate of 1900. I could tell it wasn't right. I tried to document it, but so many things were going on and I was flustered. I think they were just creating a record for those people in order to process their ballots. They had a systematic way of doing it, they were good at it. It was coordinated and it was organized."

There was no way for challengers to see if the voter signatures matched, according to Schnorak. "They would not let us get anywhere near close enough to do that."

There may be errors in the data. There could be people with the exact same name living at the same address who are erroneously included in the data. People could have died after mailing in their absentee ballot a week before election day. But according to the Lorton service, that situation should be very rare. The Lorton officials said that they cross-check their data with obituaries and the Social Security death index.

This does NOT INCLUDE, people who voted in-person, and does NOT INCLUDE, people who voted absentee in the rest of Michigan. It also suggests, if accurate, that there may have been a systemic campaign underway to cast ballots even among people who were deceased.