Society's Child
China's policies will remain supportive for the rest of the year to help the economy advance steadily out of the Covid-19 pandemic. China is scheduled to release a set of key economic data this week on second-quarter GDP, trade, investment, industrial production and retail sales.
While the government has abandoned setting a specific growth target for this year, much attention remains focused on the second-quarter GDP growth rate as it will shed light on the outlook for the world's second-largest economy and Beijing's future policy direction.
Comment: That's the same New York Post which - together with its sister UK publication, the Daily Mail - has had ALL the scoops on Epstein (and now, apparently, on Maxwell)...
Ghislaine Maxwell is being moved from "cell to cell" in her Brooklyn lockup — over fears someone will try to kill the accused Jeffrey Epstein madam before she stands trial, according to a report.
The Post already revealed how the 58-year-old British socialite was forced to wear paper clothes and sleep on a bare mattress so she couldn't hang herself with clothes or bed sheets like Epstein.
Comment: Right... just like Epstein.
Now insiders have told the Mail on Sunday that prison officials are so "terrified someone will try to kill her" that they are constantly moving her around inside the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.
Comment: Well, at this rate, she may yet make it till August.
See also:
- Ghislaine Maxwell 'has tapes of two prominent US politicians having sex with minors' and boasted of 'owning' powerful people, former friend and jewel thief claims
- Epstein's madam and partner-in-crime Ghislaine Maxwell seeks bail, citing coronavirus, and denies charges
- Officials fear Epstein confidante Ghislaine Maxwell might commit suicide
- Epstein's 'pimp' Ghislaine Maxwell files demand to be released on bail as US files new indictment
- Former warden from Ghislaine Maxwell's NYC jail says she should be on suicide watch: It would be 'unimaginable' for her to escape justice
- Ex-Reddit CEO knew Ghislaine Maxwell was trafficking underage girls, attended parties with Al Gore, Facebook and Twitter Execs
- FBI agents used spy planes, smashed down door to Ghislaine Maxwell's $1m US bolthole
- Desperation move? Dershowitz defends Ghislaine Maxwell by citing friendship with Clintons, but Twitter scoffs
Scuffles between the two groups broke out in Bay Ridge as NYPD officers were forced to step in and separate about 100 Black Lives Matter protesters and several dozen cop supporters, video posted on social media showed.
The pro-NYPD rally launched from Bay Ridge and Fourth Avenues at about 5:30 p.m., with the counter-protest kicking off at around the same time about a mile away on 86th Street and Fourth Avenue.
Comment: See also:
- Young white mother killed by Black Lives Matter mob for allegedly saying 'All Lives Matter,' national media fully ignores
- Here's a conspiracy FACT: Soros-funded prosecutors let rioters go but declare not agreeing with Black Lives Matter is a 'hate crime'
- The need to belong, not facts, is what draws people to Black Lives Matter
- Couple who painted over Black Lives Matter lettering on California street charged with HATE CRIME
- LA mayor warns citizens to cancel Fourth of July plans to 'save lives,' but supports Black Lives Matter protests
- The Marxist agenda of Black Lives Matter is far different from the slogan
The partially caught on video brawl began on the 7 train when the suspect, Patrick Chambers, 46, shouted at two elderly men sitting across from him, "Why aren't you home with your kids?" police said.
Chambers then pulled a blade, allegedly slashing and stabbing the men, who are both in their 70s. The mayhem erupted about 7:25 a.m. on July 5 as the train rolled through Sunnyside.
Psychologists Joseph Cesario of Michigan State and David Johnson of the University of Maryland say they stand behind their work, which concludes there was "no significant evidence of anti-black disparity in the likelihood of being fatally shot by the police." But they objected to its "misuse." MacDonald cited the study in congressoinal testimony last September and again in an article for City Journal. But it wasn't until her June 3 op-ed for the Wall Street Journal that cited the study when there were "complications" on campus and outraged wokesters demanded that the profs be flogged — or something.
Comment: See also:
- Double standards: Cambridge University backs academic who tweeted 'White Lives Don't Matter'
- Chancellor affirms professor's academic freedom after Arizona college panicked over test questions about Islamic terrorism
- Oxford's calls for MORAL quarantine isn't only an attempt to undermine free speech, it's DEGRADATION of academic teaching & learning
- Dissension in the ranks: Academics break ranks to criticise New Zealand Prime Minister's lockdown strategy as too severe
- I've been fired. If you value academic freedom, that should worry you
- FBI probes allegations of 'deep-rooted' academic fraud in NYC schools
But there is a key difference in the way that the left and the right have engaged in this dialogue. Progressives have no trouble at all saying that people who reject their newspeak version of racism are in fact racist. Up until now conservatives have largely resisted reaching the logical conclusion of their definition of racism, which is essentially discrimination based on skin color. That has to change now. The blatant racial bigotry of the left must be called out. It is no longer an esoteric academic debate; it is a crisis that threatens to tear the country apart.
Take this tweet from Farnaz Fassihi, a journalist at the New York Times, in reaction to a letter calling for an end to cancel culture.
The fire triggered a massive response, with multiple fire engines and ambulances seen at the pier.
"Seventeen Sailors and four civilians are being treated for non-life threatening injuries at a local hospital," US Naval Surface Forces wrote on Twitter a while later.
Officials also announced that all the crewmembers had been evacuated from the ship and accounted for.
So far, it remains unclear what triggered the blaze. Local fire department said that at least one explosion occurred aboard the ship during the blaze.
And with public health experts warning people to continue to "Stay at Home," the slogan is taking on a perverse new meaning as humanitarian disaster looms for some 28 million people in the U.S. who are facing eviction and homelessness in the immediate future.
About 19 percent of those surveyed were unable to make any housing payment in the first week of the month, while 13 percent paid a portion of their rent or mortgage.
The numbers represent the grim fact that for four months now, a "historically high" amount of U.S. households have been unable to pay their housing bill, either on time or in full. It also represents an increase from 30 percent in June and 31 percent in June.
In an exhibition of astounding audacity, the New York Times' Editor of the Climate Desk, Hannah Fairfield, stages what is billed as a "debate" about moving forward with solutions to climate change.
Let me be perfectly clear, this is a fake debate - no debate takes place. Having given up the standards of professional journalism almost entirely, the Climate desk has moved on from misinformation, disinformation and fake news to . . . . Fake Debates.
If you have one and a half hours to utterly waste, you can watch the whole thing here.
Not only does the Times falsely claim that this represents some kind of debate, they can't even count to ten - there are only six guest speakers and Hannah....and when I attended elementary school in the 1950s, six plus one made seven (it may be the "new math", similar to that being used to count "New Covid Cases"). Oh well, almost nothing else in the video is true either.
Comment: It was rather unfortunate for all with ears to hear and eyes to see, that the NYT, with their mutual appreciation climate debaters, had no room for even this more than able young debater - now that would have been a debate:
'Climate realist' Naomi Seibt challenges Thunberg's radical climate alarmism
Luckily, this tension has subsided, but only because the majority of Americans have been assuming for the past couple months that the pandemic was going to fade away in the summer and that the "reopening" was permanent. Sadly, this is a delusion that is going to bite people in the ass in the next month or two.
In "The Economic Reopening Is A Fake-Out", published at the end of May, I stated:
The restrictions will continue in major US population centers while rural areas have mostly opened with much fanfare. The end result of this will be a flood of city dwellers into rural towns looking for relief from more strict lockdown conditions. In about a month, we should expect new viral clusters in places where there was limited transmission. I suggest that before the 4th of July holiday, state governments and the Federal government will be talking about new lockdowns, using the predictable infection spike as an excuse.
Comment: For a more accurate account of the virus' inception, don't miss: Compelling Evidence That SARS-CoV-2 Was Man-Made















Comment: See also: